HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/6/3600    most recent 00121.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Scheidt, R. A. Articles by Ghez, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Scheidt, R. A. Articles by Ghez, C.

Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching

¹Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; ²Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; ³Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and ⁴Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Submitted 3 August 2006; accepted in final form 28 September 2007

We examined control of the hand's trajectory (direction and shape) and final equilibrium position in horizontal planar arm movements by quantifying transfer of learned visuomotor rotations between two tasks that required aiming the hand to the same spatial targets. In a trajectory-reversal task ("slicing"), the hand reversed direction within the target and returned to the origin. In a positioning task ("reaching"), subjects moved the hand to the target and held it there; cursor feedback was provided only after movement ended to isolate learning of final position from trajectory direction. We asked whether learning acquired in one task would transfer to the other. Transfer would suggest that the hand's entire trajectory, including its endpoint, was controlled using a common spatial plan. Instead we found minimal transfer, suggesting that the brain used different representations of target position to specify the hand's initial trajectory and its final stabilized position. We also observed asymmetrical practice effects on hand trajectory, including systematic curvature of reaches made after rotation training and hypermetria of untrained slice reversals after reach training. These are difficult to explain with a unified control model, but were replicated in computer simulations that specified the hand's initial trajectory and its final equilibrium position. Our results suggest that the brain uses different mechanisms to plan the hand's initial trajectory and final position in point-to-point movements, that it implements these control actions sequentially, and that trajectory planning does not account for specific impedance values to be implemented about the final stabilized posture.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fishbach and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Seeing versus Believing: Conflicting Immediate and Predicted Feedback Lead to Suboptimal Motor Performance J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14140 - 14146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Liu and R. A. Scheidt Contributions of Online Visual Feedback to the Learning and Generalization of Novel Finger Coordination Patterns J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2546 - 2557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]