JN AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 3688-3695, 2007. First published October 3, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00164.2007
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/3688    most recent
00164.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rioult-Pedotti, M.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Dunaevsky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rioult-Pedotti, M.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Dunaevsky, A.

Plasticity of the Synaptic Modification Range

M.-S. Rioult-Pedotti, J. P. Donoghue and A. Dunaevsky

Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

Submitted 13 February 2007; accepted in final form 27 September 2007

Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity is likely to provide a mechanism for learning and memory. Cortical synaptic responses that are strengthened within a fixed synaptic modification range after 5 days of motor skill learning are driven near the top of their range, leaving only limited room for additional synaptic strengthening. If synaptic strengthening is a requisite step for acquiring new skills, near saturation of long-term potentiation (LTP) should impede further learning or the LTP mechanism should recover after single-task learning. Here we show that the initial learning-induced synaptic enhancement is sustained even long after training has been discontinued and that the synaptic modification range shifts upward. This range shift places increased baseline synaptic efficacy back within the middle of its operating range, allowing prelearning levels of LTP and long-term depression. Persistent synaptic strengthening might be a substrate for long-term retention in motor cortex, whereas the shift in synaptic modification range ensures the availability for new synaptic strengthening.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M.-S. Rioult-Pedotti, Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Box G-LN-483, Sidney Frank Hall of Life Sciences, 185 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912 (E-mail: Mengia_Rioult-Pedotti{at}brown.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. J. Harms, M. S. Rioult-Pedotti, D. R. Carter, and A. Dunaevsky
Transient Spine Expansion and Learning-Induced Plasticity in Layer 1 Primary Motor Cortex
J. Neurosci., May 28, 2008; 28(22): 5686 - 5690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.