JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 200-207, 2008. First published October 31, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00926.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Videos
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/1/200    most recent
00926.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masseck, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, K.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masseck, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmann, K.-P.

Responses to Moving Visual Stimuli in Pretectal Neurons of the Small-Spotted Dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula)

Olivia Andrea Masseck1,2 and Klaus-Peter Hoffmann1

1Department of General Zoology and Neurobiology and 2International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Submitted 17 August 2007; accepted in final form 25 October 2007

Single-unit recordings were performed from a retinorecipient pretectal area (corpus geniculatum laterale) in Scyliorhinus canicula. The function and homology of this nucleus has not been clarified so far. During visual stimulation with a random dot pattern, 45 (35%) neurons were found to be direction selective, 10 (8%) were axis selective (best neuronal responses to rotations in both directions around one particular stimulus axis), and 75 (58%) were movement sensitive. Direction-selective responses were found to the following stimulus directions (in retinal coordinates): temporonasal and nasotemporal horizontal movements, up- and downward vertical movements, and oblique movements. All directions of motion were represented equally by our sample of pretectal neurons. Additionally we tested the responses of 58 of the 130 neurons to random dot patterns rotating around the semicircular canal or body axes to investigate whether direction-selective visual information is mapped into vestibular coordinates in pretectal neurons of this chondrichthyan species. Again all rotational directions were represented equally, which argues against a direct transformation from a retinal to a vestibular reference frame. If a complete transformation had occurred, responses to rotational axes corresponding to the axes of the semicircular canals should have been overrepresented. In conclusion, the recorded direction-selective neurons in the Cgl are plausible detectors for retinal slip created by body rotations in all directions.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K.-P. Hoffmann, Dept. General Zoology and Neurobiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, ND 7/31, D-44780 Bochum, Germany (E-mail: kph{at}neurobiologie.rub.de)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. A. Masseck and K.-P. Hoffmann
Question of Reference Frames: Visual Direction-Selective Neurons in the Accessory Optic System of Goldfish
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2781 - 2789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.