HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/2/734    most recent 01283.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Turner, G. C. Articles by Laurent, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turner, G. C. Articles by Laurent, G.

Olfactory Representations by Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons

¹Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena; and ²The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California

Submitted 27 November 2007; accepted in final form 17 December 2007

Learning and memory has been studied extensively in Drosophila using behavioral, molecular, and genetic approaches. These studies have identified the mushroom body as essential for the formation and retrieval of olfactory memories. We investigated odor responses of the principal neurons of the mushroom body, the Kenyon cells (KCs), in Drosophila using whole cell recordings in vivo. KC responses to odors were highly selective and, thus sparse, compared with those of their direct inputs, the antennal lobe projection neurons (PNs). We examined the mechanisms that might underlie this transformation and identified at least three contributing factors: excitatory synaptic potentials (from PNs) decay rapidly, curtailing temporal integration, PN convergence onto individual KCs is low (10 PNs per KC on average), and KC firing thresholds are high. Sparse activity is thought to be useful in structures involved in memory in part because sparseness tends to reduce representation overlaps. By comparing activity patterns evoked by the same odors across olfactory receptor neurons and across KCs, we show that representations of different odors do indeed become less correlated as they progress through the olfactory system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Yarali, S. Ehser, F. Z. Hapil, J. Huang, and B. Gerber Odour intensity learning in fruit flies Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2009; 276(1672): 3413 - 3420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Demmer and P. Kloppenburg Intrinsic Membrane Properties and Inhibitory Synaptic Input of Kenyon Cells as Mechanisms for Sparse Coding? J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1538 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Tanaka, K. Ito, and M. Stopfer Odor-Evoked Neural Oscillations in Drosophila Are Mediated by Widely Branching Interneurons J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8595 - 8603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Armstrong and J. I. van Hemert Towards a virtual fly brain Phil Trans R Soc A, June 13, 2009; 367(1896): 2387 - 2397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, A. Mamiya, A.-s. Chiang, and Y. Zhong Imaging of an Early Memory Trace in the Drosophila Mushroom Body J. Neurosci., April 23, 2008; 28(17): 4368 - 4376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]