JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 866-875, 2008. First published November 21, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00867.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/866    most recent
00867.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mooney, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lane, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mooney, R. D.

Does Reorganization in the Cuneate Nucleus Following Neonatal Forelimb Amputation Influence Development of Anomalous Circuits Within the Somatosensory Cortex?

Richard D. Lane, Charles P. Pluto, Cynthia L. Kenmuir, Nicolas L. Chiaia and Richard D. Mooney

Department of Neurosciences, University of Toledo, College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio

Submitted 3 August 2007; accepted in final form 19 November 2007

Neonatal forelimb amputation in rats produces sprouting of sciatic nerve afferent fibers into the cuneate nucleus (CN) and results in 40% of individual CN neurons expressing both forelimb-stump and hindlimb receptive fields. The forelimb-stump region of primary somatosensory cortex (S-I) of these rats contains neurons in layer IV that express both stump and hindlimb receptive fields. However, the source of the aberrant input is the S-I hindlimb region conveyed to the S-I forelimb-stump region via intracortical projections. Although the reorganization in S-I reflects changes in cortical circuitry, it is possible that these in turn are dependent on the CN reorganization. The present study was designed to directly test whether the sprouting of sciatic afferents into the CN is required for expression of the hindlimb inputs in the S-I forelimb-stump field. To inhibit sprouting, neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) was applied to the cut nerves following amputation. At P60 or older, NT-3-treated rats showed minimal sciatic nerve fibers in the CN. Multiunit electrophysiological recordings in the CN of NT-3-treated, amputated rats revealed 6.3% of sites were both stump/hindlimb responsive, compared with 30.5% in saline-treated amputated animals. Evaluation of the S-I following GABA receptor blockade, revealed that the percentage of hindlimb responsive sites in the stump representation of the NT-3-treated rats (34.2%) was not significantly different from that in saline-treated rats (31.5%). These results indicate that brain stem reorganization in the form of sprouting of sciatic afferents into the CN is not necessary for development of anomalous hindlimb receptive fields within the S-I forelimb/stump region.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. D. Lane, Dept. of Neurosciences, UT-COM, M.S. 1007, 3000 Arlington Ave., Toledo, OH 43614-2598 (E-mail: richard.lane{at}utoledo.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.