HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/3/1096    most recent 01252.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Klass, M. Articles by Duchateau, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Klass, M. Articles by Duchateau, J.

Spinal Mechanisms Contribute to Differences in the Time to Failure of Submaximal Fatiguing Contractions Performed With Different Loads

¹Laboratory of Applied Biology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and ²Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Submitted 13 November 2007; accepted in final form 5 January 2008

This study compared the mechanisms that limit the time to failure of a sustained submaximal contraction at 20% of maximum when the elbow flexors either supported an inertial load (position task) or exerted an equivalent constant torque against a rigid restraint (force task). The surface electromyogram (EMG), the motor-evoked potential (MEP) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, and the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and maximal M-wave (Mmax) elicited by electrical stimulation of the brachial plexus were recorded in biceps brachii during the two tasks. Although the time to failure for the position task was only 44% of that for the force task, the rate of increase of the average EMG (aEMG; % initial MVC) and MEP area (% Mmax) did not differ significantly during the two tasks. At task failure, however, the increases in normalized aEMG and MEP area were significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the force task (36.4 and 219.9%) than for the position task (22.4 and 141.7%). Furthermore, the superimposed mechanical twitch (% initial MVC), evoked by TMS during a brief MVC of the elbow flexors immediately after task failure, was increased similarly in both tasks. Although the normalized H-reflex area (% Mmax) decreased during the two fatiguing contractions, the reduction was more rapid and greater during the position task (59.8%) compared with the force task (34.7%). Taken together, the results suggest that spinal mechanisms were a major determinant of the briefer time to failure for the position task.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. W. Hoffman, T. Oya, T. J. Carroll, and A. G. Cresswell Increases in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal plantar flexion J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 112 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Burnley Estimation of critical torque using intermittent isometric maximal voluntary contractions of the quadriceps in humans J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2009; 106(3): 975 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Schmitt, C. DelloRusso, and R. F. Fregosi Force-EMG Changes During Sustained Contractions of a Human Upper Airway Muscle J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 558 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. A. Riley, S. Baudry, and R. M. Enoka Reflex Inhibition in Human Biceps Brachii Decreases With Practice of a Fatiguing Contraction J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2843 - 2851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Hunter, T. Yoon, J. Farinella, E. E. Griffith, and A. V. Ng Time to task failure and muscle activation vary with load type for a submaximal fatiguing contraction with the lower leg J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]