JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 1105-1118, 2008. First published January 9, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00435.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1105    most recent
00435.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, R. K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, R. K. S.

Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Group I mGluR-Induced Persistent AHP Suppression in CA3 Hippocampal Neurons

Steven R. Young, Riccardo Bianchi and Robert K. S. Wong

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and the Robert F. Furchgott Center for Neural and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York

Submitted 17 April 2007; accepted in final form 7 January 2008

Activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) leads to a concerted modulation of spike afterpotentials in guinea pig hippocampal neurons including a suppression of both medium and slow afterhyperpolarizations (AHPs). Suppression of AHPs may be long-lasting, in that it persists after washout of the agonist. Here, we show that persistent AHP suppression differs from short-term, transient suppression in that distinct and additional signaling processes are required to render the suppression persistent. Persistent AHP suppression followed DHPG application for 30 min, but not DHPG application for 5 min. Persistent AHP suppression was temperature dependent, occurring at 30–31°C, but not at 25–26°C. Preincubation of slices in inhibitors of protein synthesis (cycloheximide or anisomycin) prevented the persistent suppression of AHPs by DHPG. Similarly, preincubation of slices in an inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase (SB 203580) prevented persistent AHP suppression. In contrast, a blocker of p42/44 MAP kinase activation (PD 98059) had no effect on persistent AHP suppression. Additionally, we show that the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP, but not the mGluR1 antagonist LY 367385, prevented DHPG-induced persistent AHP suppression. Thus persistent AHP suppression by DHPG in hippocampal neurons requires activation of mGluR5. In addition, activation of p38 MAP kinase signaling and protein synthesis are required to impart persistence to the DHPG-activated AHP suppression.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. R. Young, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology Box 29, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11203 (E-mail: syoung{at}downstate.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Bianchi, S.-C. Chuang, W. Zhao, S. R. Young, and R. K. S. Wong
Cellular Plasticity for Group I mGluR-Mediated Epileptogenesis
J. Neurosci., March 18, 2009; 29(11): 3497 - 3507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.