HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/3/1243    most recent 01118.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taube, W. Articles by Gollhofer, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taube, W. Articles by Gollhofer, A.

Differential Modulation of Spinal and Corticospinal Excitability During Drop Jumps

¹Department of Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany; ²Swiss Paraplegic Centre, University Hospital Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland; and ³Neuromuscular Research Centre, Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Submitted 9 October 2007; accepted in final form 14 January 2008

Previously it was shown that spinal excitability during hopping and drop jumping is high in the initial phase of ground contact when the muscle is stretched but decreases toward takeoff. To further understand motor control of stretch-shortening cycle, this study aimed to compare modulation of spinal and corticospinal excitability at distinct phases following ground contact in drop jump. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and H-reflexes were elicited at the time of the short (SLR)-, medium (MLR)-, and long (LLR, LLR₂)-latency responses of the soleus muscle (SOL) after jumps from 31 cm height. MEPs and H-reflexes were expressed relative to the background electromyographic (EMG) activity. H-reflexes were highly facilitated at SLR (172%) and then progressively decreased (MLR = 133%; LLR = 123%; LLR₂ = 110%). TMS showed no effect at SLR, MLR, and LLR, whereas MEPs were significantly facilitated at the LLR₂ (122%; P = 0.003). Background EMG was highest at LLR and lowest at LLR₂. Strong H-reflex facilitation at the beginning of the stance phase indicated significant contribution of Ia-afferent input to the -motoneurons during this phase that then progressively declined toward takeoff. Conversely, corticospinal excitability was exclusively increased at the phase of push off (LLR₂, 120 ms). It is argued that corticomotoneurons increased their excitability at LLR₂. At LLR (90 ms), Ia-afferent transmission as well as corticospinal excitability was low, whereas background EMG was high. Therefore it is speculated that other sources, presumably subcortical in origin, contributed to the EMG activity at LLR in drop jumps.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Galindo, J. Barthelemy, M. Ishikawa, P. Chavet, V. Martin, J. Avela, P. V. Komi, and C. Nicol Neuromuscular control in landing from supra-maximal dropping height J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 539 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]