JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 1503-1514, 2008. First published January 16, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00892.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/1503    most recent
00892.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hacker, K.
Right arrow Articles by Medler, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hacker, K.
Right arrow Articles by Medler, K.

Evidence for Two Populations of Bitter Responsive Taste Cells in Mice

Kyle Hacker1, Agnes Laskowski1, Li Feng1, Diego Restrepo2 and Kathryn Medler1

1Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York; and 2Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center Neuroscience Program and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado

Submitted 10 August 2007; accepted in final form 11 January 2008

Taste receptor cells use multiple signaling mechanisms to detect different taste stimuli in the oral cavity. Ionic stimuli (sour, salty) interact directly with ion channels to elicit responses, whereas bitter, sweet, and umami tastants activate G protein–coupled receptors to initiate phospholipase C (PLC)-dependent release of calcium from intracellular stores. However, the precise role for PLC in taste responses remains unclear. One study reported that bitter, sweet, and umami detection is abolished in PLCβ2 knock-out animals, indicating that the perception of these stimuli depends solely on PLCβ2. In contrast, another study found that PLCβ2 knock-out mice have a reduced, but not abolished, capacity to detect these taste qualities, suggesting a PLCβ2-independent signaling pathway may be involved in the detection of taste stimuli. Since PLCβ2-expressing taste cells do not have conventional synapses or express voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), we sought to determine if any taste cells responding to bitter express VGCCs. We characterized calcium responses generated by bitter stimuli to activate the PLC pathway and 50 mM KCl to activate VGCCs. Comparisons of evoked calcium responses found that these two stimuli generated significantly different responses. Surprisingly, although most responsive taste cells responded to bitter or 50 mM KCl, some taste cells responded to both. Analysis of dual responsive cells found that bitter responses were inhibited by the PLC inhibitor U73122. Immunocytochemical analysis detected PLCβ3 and IP3R1, indicating the presence of multiple PLC signaling pathways in taste cells.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. Medler, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Univ. at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260 (E-mail: kmedler{at}buffalo.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Hacker and K. F. Medler
Mitochondrial Calcium Buffering Contributes to the Maintenance of Basal Calcium Levels in Mouse Taste Cells
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2177 - 2191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.