HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/4/1758    most recent 01207.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Biesdorf, S. Articles by Straka, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Biesdorf, S. Articles by Straka, H.

Differential Inhibitory Control of Semicircular Canal Nerve Afferent-Evoked Inputs in Second-Order Vestibular Neurons by Glycinergic and GABAergic Circuits

¹ Laboratoire de Neurobiologie des Réseaux Sensorimoteurs, ³Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 7060, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; and ²Departments of Physiology and ^,3Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany

Submitted 30 October 2007; accepted in final form 2 February 2008

Labyrinthine nerve-evoked monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in second-order vestibular neurons (2°VN) sum with disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) that originate from the thickest afferent fibers of the same nerve branch and are mediated by neurons in the ipsilateral vestibular nucleus. Pharmacological properties of the inhibition and the interaction with the afferent excitation were studied by recording monosynaptic responses of phasic and tonic 2°VN in an isolated frog brain after electrical stimulation of individual semicircular canal nerves. Specific transmitter antagonists revealed glycine and GABA_A receptor-mediated IPSPs with a disynaptic onset only in phasic but not in tonic 2°VN. Compared with GABAergic IPSPs, glycinergic responses in phasic 2°VN have larger amplitudes and a longer duration and reduce early and late components of the afferent nerve-evoked subthreshold activation and spike discharge. The difference in profile of the disynaptic glycinergic and GABAergic inhibition is compatible with the larger number of glycinergic as opposed to GABAergic terminal-like structures on 2°VN. The increase in monosynaptic excitation after a block of the disynaptic inhibition in phasic 2°VN is in part mediated by a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-activated component. Although inhibitory inputs were superimposed on monosynaptic EPSPs in tonic 2°VN as well, the much longer latency of these IPSPs excludes a control by short-latency inhibitory feed-forward side-loops as observed in phasic 2°VN. The differential synaptic organization of the inhibitory control of labyrinthine afferent signals in phasic and tonic 2°VN is consistent with the different intrinsic signal processing modes of the two neuronal types and suggests a co-adaptation of intrinsic membrane properties and emerging network properties.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Pfanzelt, C. Rossert, M. Rohregger, S. Glasauer, L. E. Moore, and H. Straka Differential Dynamic Processing of Afferent Signals in Frog Tonic and Phasic Second-Order Vestibular Neurons J. Neurosci., October 8, 2008; 28(41): 10349 - 10362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]