HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/4/1928    most recent 00469.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nelken, I. Articles by Schnupp, J. W. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nelken, I. Articles by Schnupp, J. W. H.

Responses of Auditory Cortex to Complex Stimuli: Functional Organization Revealed Using Intrinsic Optical Signals

¹Department of Neurobiology and the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel; and ²Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Submitted 25 April 2007; accepted in final form 11 February 2008

We used optical imaging of intrinsic signals to study the large-scale organization of ferret auditory cortex in response to complex sounds. Cortical responses were collected during continuous stimulation by sequences of sounds with varying frequency, period, or interaural level differences. We used a set of stimuli that differ in spectral structure, but have the same periodicity and therefore evoke the same pitch percept (click trains, sinusoidally amplitude modulated tones, and iterated ripple noise). These stimuli failed to reveal a consistent periodotopic map across the auditory fields imaged. Rather, gradients of period sensitivity differed for the different types of periodic stimuli. Binaural interactions were studied both with single contralateral, ipsilateral, and diotic broadband noise bursts and with sequences of broadband noise bursts with varying level presented contralaterally, ipsilaterally, or in opposite phase to both ears. Contralateral responses were generally largest and ipsilateral responses were smallest when using single noise bursts, but the extent of the activated area was large and comparable in all three aural configurations. Modulating the amplitude in counter phase to the two ears generally produced weaker modulation of the optical signals than the modulation produced by the monaural stimuli. These results suggest that binaural interactions seen in cortex are most likely predominantly due to subcortical processing. Thus our optical imaging data do not support the theory that the primary or nonprimary cortical fields imaged are topographically organized to form consistent maps of systematically varying sensitivity either to stimulus pitch or to simple binaural properties of the acoustic stimuli.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Tillein, P. Hubka, E. Syed, R. Hartmann, A.K. Engel, and A. Kral Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference in Congenital Deafness Cereb Cortex, November 11, 2009; (2009) bhp222v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Bizley, K. M. M. Walker, B. W. Silverman, A. J. King, and J. W. H. Schnupp Interdependent Encoding of Pitch, Timbre, and Spatial Location in Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., February 18, 2009; 29(7): 2064 - 2075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kral, J. Tillein, P. Hubka, D. Schiemann, S. Heid, R. Hartmann, and A. K. Engel Spatiotemporal Patterns of Cortical Activity with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Congenital Deafness J. Neurosci., January 21, 2009; 29(3): 811 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]