JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 2220-2231, 2008. First published March 12, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00912.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/2220    most recent
00912.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, T.
Right arrow Articles by Miltner, W. H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, T.
Right arrow Articles by Miltner, W. H. R.

How Do Brain Areas Communicate During the Processing of Noxious Stimuli? An Analysis of Laser-Evoked Event-Related Potentials Using the Granger Causality Index

Thomas Weiss1,*, Wolfram Hesse2,*, Mihaela Ungureanu2, Holger Hecht1, Lutz Leistritz2, Herbert Witte2 and Wolfgang H. R. Miltner1

1Biological and Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, and 2 Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

Submitted 15 August 2007; accepted in final form 10 March 2008

Several imaging techniques have identified different brain areas involved in the processing of noxious stimulation and thus in the constitution of pain. However, only little is known how these brain areas communicate with one another after activation by stimulus processing and which areas directionally affect or modulate the activity of succeeding areas. One measure for the analysis of such interactions is represented by the Granger Causality Index (GCI). In applying time-varying bivariate and partial variants of this concept (tvGCI), the aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction of neural activities between a set of scalp electrodes that best represent the brain electrical neural activity of major cortical areas involved in the processing of noxious laser-heat stimuli and their variation in time. Bivariate and partial tvGCIs were calculated within four different intervals of laser-evoked event-related potentials (LEPs) including a baseline period prior to stimulus application and three intervals immediately following stimulus application, i.e., between 170 and 200 ms (at the N2 component), between 260 and 320 ms (P2 component), and between 320 and 400 ms (P3 component of LEPs). Results show some similarities, but also some striking differences between bivariate and partial tvGCIs. These differences might be explained by the nature of bivariate and partial tvGCIs. However, both tvGCI approaches revealed a directed interaction between medial and lateral electrodes of the centroparietal region. This result was interpreted as a directed interaction between the anterior cingulate cortex and the secondary somatosensory cortex and the insula, structures that are significantly involved in the constitution of pain.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Weiss, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Psychology, Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, D-07737 Jena, Germany (E-mail: thomas.weiss{at}uni-jena.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.