JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 2305-2319, 2008. First published February 27, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.01125.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/2305    most recent
01125.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y.

Representations of Cat Meows and Human Vowels in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Awake Cats

Ling Qin1,2, Jing Yu Wang1 and Yu Sato1

1Department of Physiology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan; and 2First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China

Submitted 11 October 2007; accepted in final form 27 February 2008

Previous investigation of neural responses to cat meows in the primary auditory cortex (A1) of the anesthetized cat revealed a preponderance of phasic responses aligned to stimulus onset, offset, or envelope peaks. Sustained responses during stationary components of the stimulus were rarely seen. This observation motivates further investigation into how stationary components of naturalistic auditory stimuli are encoded by A1 neurons. We therefore explored neuronal response patterns in A1 of the awake cat using natural meows, time-reversed meows, and human vowels as stimuli. We found heterogeneous response types: ~2/3 of units classified as "phasic cells" responding only to amplitude envelope variations and the remaining 1/3 were "phasic-tonic cells" with continuous responses during the stationary components. The classification was upheld across all stimuli tested for a given cell. The differences of phasic responses were correlated with amplitude-envelope differences in the early stimulus portion (<100 ms), whereas the differences between tonic responses were correlated with ongoing spectral differences in the later stimulus portion. Phasic-tonic cells usually had a characteristic frequency (CF) <5 kHz, which corresponded to the dominant spectral range of vocalizations, suggesting that the cells encode spectral information. Phasic cells had CFs across the tested frequency range (<16 kHz). Instantaneous firing rates for natural and time-reversed meows were different, but mean rates for different categories of stimuli were similar. Evidence for cat's A1 preferring conspecific meows was not found. These functionally heterogeneous responses may serve to encode ongoing changes in sound spectra or amplitude envelope occurring throughout the entirety of the sound stimulus.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. Qin, Dept. of Physiology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan (E-mail: qinling{at}yamanashi.ac.jp)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.