JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 2408-2419, 2008. First published February 6, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.01085.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/2408    most recent
01085.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tytell, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, A. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tytell, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, A. H.

Rostral Versus Caudal Differences in Mechanical Entrainment of the Lamprey Central Pattern Generator for Locomotion

Eric D. Tytell1 and Avis H. Cohen1,2

1Department of Biology and 2Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

Submitted 28 September 2007; accepted in final form 2 February 2008

In fishes, undulatory swimming is produced by sets of spinal interneurons constituting a central pattern generator (CPG). The CPG generates waves of muscle activity that travel from head to tail, which then bend the body into wave shapes that also travel from head to tail. In many fishes, the wavelengths of the neural and mechanical waves are different, resulting in a rostral-to-caudal gradient in phase lag between muscle activity and bending. The neural basis of this phase gradient was investigated in the lamprey spinal cord using an isolated in vitro preparation. Fictive swimming was induced using D-glutamate and the output of the CPG was measured using suction electrodes placed on the ventral roots. The spinal cord was bent sinusoidally at various points along its length. First, the ranges of entrainment were estimated. Middle segments were able to entrain to frequencies approximately twice as high as those at end segments. Next, phase lags between centers of ventral root bursts and the stimulus were determined. Two halves of the cycle were identified: stretching and shortening of the edge of spinal cord on the same side as the electrode. Stimuli at rostral segments tended to entrain segmental bursting at the beginning of the stretch phase, almost 50% out of phase with previously measured in vivo electromyography data. Stimuli at caudal segments, in contrast, entrained segments at the end of stretch and the beginning of shortening, approximately the same phase as in vivo data.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: E. D. Tytell, Department of Biology, Biology/Psychology Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (E-mail: tytell{at}umd.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.