HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/6/2798    most recent 90237.2008v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Nuding, U. Articles by Glasauer, S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nuding, U. Articles by Glasauer, S.

A Theory of the Dual Pathways for Smooth Pursuit Based on Dynamic Gain Control

¹Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany; and ²Yerkes National Primate Research Center and Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

The smooth pursuit eye movement (SPEM) system is much more sensitive to target motion perturbations during pursuit than during fixation. This sensitivity is commonly attributed to a dynamic gain control mechanism. Neither the neural substrate nor the functional architecture for this gain control has been fully revealed. There are at least two cortical areas that crucially contribute to smooth pursuit and are therefore eligible sites for dynamic gain control: the medial superior temporal area (MST) and the pursuit area of the frontal eye fields (FEFs), which both project to brain stem premotor structures via parallel pathways. The aim of this study was to develop a model of smooth pursuit based on behavioral, anatomical, and neurophysiological results to account for nonlinear dynamic gain control. Using a behavioral paradigm in humans consisting of a sinusoidal oscillation (4 Hz, ±8°/s) superimposed on a constant velocity target motion (0–24°/s), we were able to identify relevant gain control parameters in the model. A salient feature of our model is the emergence of two parallel pathways from higher visual cortical to lower motor areas in the brain stem that correspond to the MST and FEF pathways. Detailed analysis of the model revealed that one pathway mainly carries eye velocity related signals, whereas the other is associated mostly with eye acceleration. From comparison with known neurophysiological results we conclude that the dynamic gain control can be attributed to the FEF pathway, whereas the MST pathway serves as the basic circuit for maintaining an ongoing SPEM.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Nuding, R. Kalla, N. G. Muggleton, U. Buttner, V. Walsh, and S. Glasauer TMS Evidence for Smooth Pursuit Gain Control by the Frontal Eye Fields Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; (2008) bhn162v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ono and M. J. Mustari Smooth Pursuit-Related Information Processing in Frontal Eye Field Neurons that Project to the NRTP Cereb Cortex, September 26, 2008; (2008) bhn166v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]