JN AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 1169-1170, 2008. First published June 25, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90693.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1169    most recent
90693.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. G.

EDITORIAL FOCUS

Receptor Synergy From Thin Fiber Muscle Afferents. Focus on "Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Innervating Skeletal Muscle Respond to Physiological Combinations of Protons, ATP, and Lactate Mediated by ASIC, P2X, and TRPV1"

In the recent article by Light et al., the authors identify the substances critical to signaling pain and fatigue in skeletal muscle. The identified substances act on Group III and IV fibers, which are thinly myelinated and unmyelinated, respectively, and correspond to their better known cutaneous counterparts, A{delta} and C fibers. Group III and IV afferents, often called thin fiber muscle afferents, comprise the afferent arm of the exercise pressor reflex (Coote and Pérez-González 1970Go; McCloskey and Mitchell 1972Go), which functions to increase arterial perfusion pressure and/ or cardiac output during exercise. Substantial evidence has accumulated in humans to show that thin fiber muscle afferents play an important role in evoking some of the cardiovascular and sympathetic neural responses to both dynamic and static exercise (Mitchell et al. 1989Go; Strange et al. 1993Go; Victor et al. 1989Go). Although both mechanical and metabolic stimuli are known to evoke the exercise pressor reflex, the latter have received the most attention because metabolic stimulation of thin fiber muscle afferents seems likely to signal the spinal cord and brain stem that blood/oxygen supply to the exercising muscles is inadequate to meet demand. One of the first to provide evidence for a "metabolic error signal" was Alam and Smirk, who showed that the pressor response to exercise was greater when the circulation to the working limb was occluded than when the circulation was allowed to flow freely (Alam and Smirk 1937Go). They also showed that the pressor response was partly maintained after the end of the exercise period if the circulation to the working muscles remained occluded (Alam and Smirk 1937Go). The maintained pressor response to exercise has been named the muscle metaboreflex and was attributed to trapped metabolites in the exercising muscles.

Many investigators have attempted to discover the nature of the specific metabolite that evoked the muscle metaboreflex. The traditional approach has been to compare the pressor and often the sympathetic nerve responses to contraction of limb muscles before and after either blocking the receptors to a specific metabolite or blocking an enzyme within muscle that produces a metabolite. The findings from these types of experiments have been quite consistent, namely that blockade of one receptor on the endings of the thin fiber muscle afferents or the prevention of the production of a single metabolite by the exercising muscles has reduced the pressor response to contraction by about half. Unfortunately, this finding has been reported for several metabolites or their receptors, including prostaglandins (Hayes et al. 2006Go; Stebbins et al. 1988Go), bradykinin (Stebbins and Longhurst 1986Go), lactic acid (Hayes et al. 2007Go), and ATP (Hanna and Kaufman 2003Go). Using simple arithmetic one can easily see that adding the individual magnitudes of the reduction in the pressor response to exercise far exceeds 100%. Until now, the apparent problem in interpreting the data has received little attention.

Light et al. have shown that the adequate stimuli to thin fiber muscle afferents are combinations of metabolites. Exposure of these cells to any one metabolite had only small stimulatory effects on the cells, whereas the combination of three had effects that exceeded the simple summation of each one individually. Specifically, Light et al. used calcium imaging of cultured dorsal root ganglion cells from mice to detect the specific agonists that stimulated them as well as antagonists to detect their receptors. In addition, these investigators found two populations of dorsal root ganglion cells arising from muscle. The first population was thought to detect levels of muscle metabolites that contribute to evoking the exercise pressor reflex but did not cause pain. The second was thought to detect painful levels of muscle metabolites, such as those produced by injury or ischemia.

In particular the first finding, namely that combinations of protons, lactate, and ATP were required to activate dorsal root ganglion cells, is an important advance. This finding explains why blockade of one receptor on the endings of group III and IV muscle afferents or the production of one metabolite prevents a large percentage of the exercise pressor reflex. It also predicts that pain-induced responses arising from noxious stimulation of muscle should be greatly attenuated by blockade of one receptor; this prediction needs further confirmation.

Every experimental preparation imposes limits on the interpretation of one's findings, and this is certainly the case with those reported by Light et al. These limitations, however, are recognized by the authors and have been given the appropriate discussion. Nevertheless, it is still important to mention some of them here. First, Light et al. were stimulating and blocking receptors on cell bodies and not on the endings of group III and IV afferents in the interstitium of muscle. The receptor concentrations and affinities may differ between in vivo and cultured cell preparations, an effect that may in part be caused by differences in growth factors. Second, obviously one cannot identify afferents that respond to contraction when using cultured dorsal root ganglion cells, a limitation that makes it impossible to discern the relationship between metabolites and cells responsive to muscular contraction. Third, the preparation does not allow one to distinguish group III afferents from group IV afferents. In fact, in mice, the species used by Light et al., the conduction velocities defining group III afferents remain to be determined. Fourth, species differences in receptors among humans, mice, and cats may be important and are worthy of further investigation. Fifth, other factors, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, may also play a role in stimulating thin fiber muscle afferents.

The preceding limitations do not detract from the significance of the findings. Light et al. have shown the importance of combinations of muscle metabolites in stimulating thin fiber afferents. This advance in our knowledge will have a significant impact on investigation of autonomic and ventilatory control during exercise as well as on nociceptive signaling from deep tissues such as skeletal muscle.

Marc P. Kaufman and Shawn G. Hayes

Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. P. Kaufman, Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania

REFERENCES

Alam M, Smirk FH. Observation in man upon a blood pressure raising reflex arising from the voluntary muscles. J Physiol 89: 372–383, 1937.[Free Full Text]

Coote JH, Pérez-González JF. The response of some sympathetic neurons to volleys in various afferent nerves. J Physiol 208: 261–278, 1970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hanna RL, Kaufman MP. Role played by purinergic receptors on muscle afferents in evoking the exercise pressor reflex. J Appl Physiol 94: 1437–1445, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayes SG, Kindig AE, Kaufman MP. Cyclooxygenase blockade attenuates responses of group III and IV muscle afferents to dynamic exercise in cats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290: H2239–H2246, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hayes SG, Kindig AE, Kaufman MP. Blockade of acid sensing ion channels attenuates the exercise pressor reflex in cats. J Physiol 581: 1271–2323, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Light AR, Hughen RW, Zhang J, Rainier J, Liu Z, Lee J. Dorsal root ganglion neurons innervating skeletal muscle respond to physiological combinations of Protons, ATP, and lactate mediated by ASIC, P2X, and TRPV1. J Neurophysiol doi:10.1152/jn.01344.2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McCloskey DI, Mitchell JH. Reflex cardiovascular and respiratory responses originating in exercising muscle. J Physiol 224: 173–186, 1972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mitchell JH, Reeves DR, Rogers HB, Secher NH. Epidural anesthesia and cardiovascular responses to static exercise in man. J Physiol 417: 13–24, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stebbins CL, Longhurst JC. Bradykinin in reflex cardiovascular response to static muscular contraction. J Appl Physiol 61: 271–279, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stebbins CL, Maruoka Y, Longhurst JC. Prostaglandins contribute to cardiovascular reflexes evoked by static muscular contraction. Circ Res 59: 645–654, 1988.[Web of Science]

Strange S, Secher NH, Pawelczyk JA, Karpakka J, Christensen NJ, Mitchell JH, Saltin B. Neural control of cardiovascular responses and of ventilation during dynamic exercise in man. J Physiol 470: 693–704, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Victor RG, Pryor SL, Secher NH, Mitchell JH. Effects of partial neuromuscular blockade on sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans. Circ Res 65: 468–476, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/1169    most recent
90693.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, S. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.