JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 100: 1697-1698, 2008. First published August 6, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90823.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/1697    most recent
90823.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roussin, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Di Lorenzo, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roussin, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Di Lorenzo, P. M.

EDITORIAL FOCUS

Oh, How Sweet It Is. Focus on "Altered Pontine Processing in a Rat Model of Obesity"

Obesity is an increasing problem in the United States and is responsible for a host of associated health problems, including hypertension and diabetes. It is therefore important to identify factors contributing to overeating and consumption of unhealthy foods; taste perception and preference are obvious factors to consider. In a recent article, Kovacs and Hajnal have uncovered a relationship between obesity and taste processing in the CNS, demonstrating that obesity alters brain stem responses to sweet stimuli.

There is evidence that obese people do in fact process taste differently from others, particularly with respect to their responses to sweet tastes. For example, obese people are less sensitive to sweet tastes but like them more than lean individuals (Bartoshuk et al. 2006Go). Differences in behavioral responses to sweet tastes also exist between populations with high levels of obesity and related maladies and the general population; African Americans (Salbe et al. 2004Go) and Pima Indians (Bacon et al. 1994Go; Desor et al. 1975Go; Schiffman et al. 2000Go) both show increased liking or preference for sweet tastes. The central mechanisms that underlie differences in both perception and the hedonics of sweet tastes between obese and nonobese individuals remain poorly understood, however.

To study these mechanisms, Kovacs and Hajnal (2008)Go investigated differences in single-neuron pontine taste responses between two strains of rat: the Otsuka Long Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) and the Long Evens Tokushima Otsuko (LETO). Gustatory responses in OLETF rats resemble those of obese humans in that, compared with LETO rats, they fail to regulate their meal size, display heightened consumption of sweet substances, and progressively develop obesity and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Bi and Moran 2002Go; Kawano et al. 1992Go). OLETF rats also display heightened consumption of sucrose solutions compared with LETO controls as well as a greater preference for highly concentrated sucrose solutions (De Jonghe et al. 2005Go).

In their recent paper, Kovacs and Hajnal (2008Go) demonstrated that obesity may alter the way sweet stimuli are processed at an early level of taste processing, the parabrachial nucleus of the pons (PbN). The PbN is home to third-order gustatory neurons and influences the motivational and hedonic aspects of taste via dopaminergic mesolimbic pathways (Norgren et al. 2006Go). Kovacs and Hajnal (2008)Go found that neurons responsive only to sucrose were more spontaneously active in OLETF rats than in lean LETO controls. Interestingly, sucrose-specific cells responded less vigorously to dilute sucrose solutions in OLETF rats compared with LETO controls while responding more to highly concentrated sucrose solutions. The net effect of these changes was that sucrose-specific cells in obese rats were sensitive to differences in concentration over a wider range of concentrations than those in lean rats (Kovacs and Hajnal 2008Go). These results are highly consistent with observations that obese humans tend to be less responsive to mildly sweet stimuli and prefer sweeter stimuli when compared with the nonobese (Bartoshuk et al. 2006Go).

Both central and peripheral effects may partially underlie the difference between pontine taste responses in OLETF and LETO rats. As with sucrose specialist cells in the PbN, responses to concentrated sucrose solutions are heightened in taste afferents carried within the chorda tympani nerve (CT, innervating taste buds on the rostral 2/3 of the tongue) of OLETF rats (Tsunoda et al. 1998Go). Central effects are also very likely to influence this change in taste responsiveness, however. Responses in broadly tuned OLETF cells were actually less vigorous than in lean controls, an effect that is opposite to what one would expect based on CT responses alone. This central modulation may arise at least in part from descending inputs to the PbN; for example, perturbing activity of the central nucleus of the amygdala, the lateral hypothalamus, and the gustatory cortex all affect taste responses in the PbN (Di Lorenzo 1990Go; Li et al. 2005Go; Lundy and Norgren 2001Go). A decrease in descending tonic inhibition is certainly consistent with the increase in spontaneous activity of sucrose-specialist neurons in OLETF rats observed by Kovacs and Hajnal (2008)Go.

Several changes in an animal's acute homeostatic state are known to affect both behavior and taste responses in the brain stem. In the nucleus of the solitary tract, the first central relay for taste, both salt deprivation (Nakamura and Norgren 1995Go; Tamura and Norgren 1997Go) and the administration of satiety factors (Giza et al. 1992Go) alter both taste responses and taste preferences. Intra-duodenal infusion of nutrients decrease PbN taste responses, especially in cells that respond only to sucrose (Hajnal et al. 1999Go); this change is the opposite of that which accompanies obesity (Kovacs and Hajnal 2008Go). The fact that the consumption of concentrated sweet solutions increases along with obesity in OLETF rats (Hajnal et al. 2005) and corresponds to changes observed in OLETF PbN responses (Kovacs and Hajnal 2008Go) suggests that obesity and/or chronic metabolic states may affect the descending projections underlying this homeostatic gustatory modulation. By showing that PbN responses to sweet tastes are selectively altered by chronic obesity, Kovacs and Hajnal (2008)Go may have uncovered a critical link between the pathological association of body weight and consumption that characterizes obesity.

Andre T. Roussin and Patricia M. Di Lorenzo

Dept. of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. M. Di Lorenzo: Dept. of Psychology, Binghamton University, Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 (E-mail: diloren{at}binghamton.edu

REFERENCES

Bacon AW, Miles JS, Schiffman SS. Effect of race on perception of fat alone and in combination with sugar. Physiol Behav 55: 603–606, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Moskowitz HR, Snyder DJ. Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361: 1137–1148, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bi S, Moran TH. Actions of CCK in the controls of food intake and body weight: lessons from the CCK-A receptor deficient OLETF rat. Neuropeptides 36: 171–181, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

De Jonghe BC, Hajnal A, Covasa M. Increased oral and decreased intestinal sensitivity to sucrose in obese, prediabetic CCK-A receptor-deficient OLETF rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 288: R292–300, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Desor JA, Greene LS, Maller O. Preferences for sweet and salty in 9- to 15-year-old and adult humans. Science 190: 686–687, 1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Di Lorenzo PM. Corticofugal influence on taste responses in the parabrachial pons of the rat. Brain Res 530: 73–84, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Giza BK, Scott TR, Vanderweele DA. Administration of satiety factors and gustatory responsiveness in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the rat. Brain Res Bull 28: 637–639, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hajnal A, Takenouchi K, Norgren R. Effect of intraduodenal lipid on parabrachial gustatory coding in awake rats. J Neurosci 19: 7182–7190, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kawano K, Hirashima T, Mori S, Saitoh Y, Kurosumi M, Natori T. Spontaneous long- term hyperglycemic rat with diabetic complications. Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) strain. Diabetes 41: 1422–1428, 1992.[Abstract]

Kovacs P, Hajnal A. Altered pontine processing in a rat model of obesity. J Neurophysiol doi:10.1152/jn.01359.2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li CS, Cho YK, Smith DV. Modulation of parabrachial taste neurons by electrical and chemical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and amygdala. J Neurophysiol 93: 1183–1196, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lundy RF Jr, Norgren R. Pontine gustatory activity is altered by electrical stimulation in the central nucleus of the amygdala. J Neurophysiol 85: 770–783, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nakamura K, Norgren R. Sodium-deficient diet reduces gustatory activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract of behaving rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 269: R647–661, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Norgren R, Hajnal A, Mungardnee SS. Gustatory reward and the nucleus accumbens. Physiol Behav 89: 531–535, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]

Salbe AD, DelParigi A, Pratley RE, Drewnowski A, Tataranni PA. Taste preferences and body weight changes in an obesity-prone population. Am J Clin Nutr 79: 372–378, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schiffman SS, Graham BG, Sattely-Miller EA, Peterson-Dancy M. Elevated and sustained desire for sweet taste in African-Americans: a potential factor in the development of obesity. Nutrition 16: 886–893, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tamura R, Norgren R. Repeated sodium depletion affects gustatory neural responses in the nucleus of the solitary tract of rats. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 273: R1381–1391, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tsunoda K, Osada K, Komai M, Zhang H, Morimoto K, Suzuki H, Furukawa Y. Effects of dietary biotin on enhanced sucrose intake and enhanced gustatory nerve responses to sucrose seen in diabetic OLETF rat. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 44: 207–216, 1998.[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/1697    most recent
90823.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roussin, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Di Lorenzo, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roussin, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Di Lorenzo, P. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.