| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Hugh Knowles Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; and 27089 Jefferson Mill Road, Scottsville, Virginia
Submitted 4 June 2008; accepted in final form 11 August 2008
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
3 kHz, the lower limbs of tuning curves have similar slopes, about –18 dB/octave, but the upper limbs have slopes that become increasingly steep with increasing frequency and CF. For CFs >4 kHz, tuning curves normalized to the CF are nearly identical and consist of three segments. A tip segment, within 30–40 dB of CF threshold, has lower- and upper-limb slopes of –60 and +120 dB/octave, respectively, and is flanked by a low-frequency ("tail") segment, with shallow slope, and a terminal high-frequency segment with very steep slope (several hundreds of dB/octave). The tuning curves of fibers innervating basal cochlear sites closely resemble basilar-membrane tuning curves computed with low isovelocity criteria. At the apex of the chinchilla cochlea, frequency tuning is substantially sharper for ANFs than for available recordings of organ of Corti vibrations. |
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
). In particular, it is unclear whether thresholds correspond to constant magnitudes of basilar-membrane (BM) displacement, velocity, or other quantities or whether such magnitudes are the same throughout the cochlea. Here we seek answers to these questions by studying frequency tuning in ANFs of chinchilla, the species in which BM and/or organ of Corti vibrations in nearly normal ears have been described in the greatest detail and at the largest number of cochlear sites, both basal and apical (e.g., Rhode 2007a; Rhode and Cooper 1996; Rhode and Recio 2000; Ruggero et al. 1997). Chinchilla is also the only species for which comparisons of the frequency selectivity of BM vibrations and neural responses are available for the same normal cochleae (Narayan et al. 1998; Ruggero et al. 2000). Although frequency-threshold curves (FTCs) for chinchilla ANFs have been illustrated in several publications (Dallos and Harris 1978; Ruggero 1992; Salvi et al. 1982; Wang et al. 1997), no account of ANF FTCs in this species is comparable in breadth or detail to accounts available for some other mammalian species (Borg et al. 1988; el Barbary 1991; Ohlemiller and Echteler 1990).
We used two large databases of ANF responses to tones to synthesize representative FTCs throughout the range of characteristic frequencies (CFs) in the chinchilla cochlea. In the present report, the first of a set of two, we show that FTCs undergo a smooth transition in symmetry at CFs around 1 kHz and an abrupt change at CFs of 3–4 kHz. We then compare the synthetic FTCs with existing mechanical-vibration data for chinchilla, including a wealth of newly available BM recordings from several basal cochlear sites (Rhode 2007a,b). At the base of the chinchilla cochlea, ANF FTCs closely match BM isovelocity tuning curves with the same CF. At the cochlear apex, ANF FTCs are more sharply tuned than organ of Corti vibrations in chinchilla. The companion paper in the set (Temchin et al. 2008) addresses the spontaneous rates (SRs) of ANFs, shows that FTCs are more sharply tuned in low-SR ANFs than in high-SR ANFs, and presents evidence that the difference in sharpness of tuning arises from the frequency distribution of cochlear compressive nonlinearity. A preliminary account of this work was published as an abstract (Temchin et al. 1997a).
|
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
The dorsal aspect of the auditory nerve was visualized after craniotomy, partial aspiration of the lateral cerebellum and placement of small cotton-ball wedges to slightly separate the brain stem from the temporal bone. Capillary-glass microelectrodes (filled with 3 M NaCl or KCl solutions, impedance 30–100 M
) were initially positioned under observation with an operation microscope and were advanced into the nerve by means of a remotely controlled hydraulic drive. The electrical signals were amplified, spikes were discriminated from the background noise, and their counts were stored in digital media.
Stimuli were synthesized digitally under computer control by a custom-built generator (Ruggero and Rich 1983) or Tucker-Davis equipment (in the most recent experiments), converted to analog waveforms and delivered acoustically via a Beyer DT-48 earphone. Stimulus pressure magnitudes were calibrated in situ, near the tympanic membrane, at the beginning of each experimental session (see Temchin et al. 1997b for details). The onset and offset of tone bursts were obtained by multiplying a sinusoid by 0.5 period, between 0 and 
radians, of raised-cosine functions [onset: 1 + cos (
t + ); offset: 1 + cos (t)], with 10–90% rise and decay times of 5 ms. The spectral composition of low-frequency stimuli produced by the sound system has been described in some detail elsewhere (see Table 1 in Ruggero et al. 1996). For tones <1 kHz, second-harmonic distortion measured in an artificial cavity was typically less than –50 dB (re the fundamental) at 106–108 dB SPL, but in live chinchillas it could reach –30 dB. For frequencies >1 kHz, second-harmonic distortion did not exceed –55 dB.
White-noise bursts (50-ms duration, presented 3/s) were used as search stimuli while attempting to isolate ANFs. On isolation of an ANF, a 10-s sample of spontaneous activity (spontaneous rate [SR]) was recorded and an FTC was measured with an automated adaptive procedure similar to that used by Kiang and Liberman (Kiang et al. 1970; Liberman 1978). FTC stimuli were 50-ms tone bursts presented every 100 ms. Tone frequencies always started at 24 kHz and were decreased to 359 Hz in 1/32-octave steps. For lower frequencies, down to 80 Hz, resolution was typically changed in 1/16-octave steps but larger steps were used in some recordings. Tone levels were typically started at 90 dB SPL. Frequency-threshold pairs were considered valid only when flanked by pairs with frequencies differing by 1/32 octave (or 1/16 octave or other standard resolution for frequencies <359 Hz) and levels no higher than the limits of the acoustic system minus 6 dB. Tone levels were changed downward in 1-dB steps after the criterion was met and upward in 2-dB steps when not. "Threshold" at a given frequency was defined as a level not meeting the criterion and preceded by two levels meeting the criterion. The criterion consisted of one more spike during the tone burst than in the interstimulus interval.
FTCs measured with the adaptive procedure were included in the database for analysis if they included both the complete upper limb (from CF threshold to 6 dB lower than the SPL limit of the system) and 
20 dB of the tip region of the lower limb. FTCs of many high-CF ANFs did not include low frequencies. CFs were determined by fitting a third-order polynomial equation to the FTC tips (within 15 dB of the minimum) after smoothing the FTCs using three-point averaging. CF and CF threshold were defined as the frequency and level of the fit minimum. [On average, the fitted CFs differed from the original CFs (the frequencies corresponding to the lowest thresholds of the unsmoothed FTCs) by 0.018 ± 0.094 octave (n = 4,155) and the fitted CF thresholds differed from the original thresholds by 2.97 ± 1.82 dB (n = 4,155).]
Synthetic tuning curves were constructed (with software written in Matlab) by averaging the individual FTCs and thresholds determined from input–output functions for responses to tones. The upper limbs of the synthetic FTCs were computed by averaging the frequencies of the individual FTCs (expressed in octaves relative to the CFs; circles in Fig. 3) at fixed thresholds relative to CF threshold (i.e., 3, 6, 10, 15 dB, and so forth higher than CF threshold). The lower limbs of the synthetic FTCs were computed by averaging the thresholds of the individual FTCs at fixed frequencies (expressed in octaves re CF; thin solid lines in Fig. 3), complemented at low frequencies (50 and 100–1,000 Hz, in 100-Hz steps) with thresholds determined (20 spikes/s above SR) from rate-level functions for responses to 100-ms tone bursts (five repetitions; repetition period: 300 ms) presented with randomized levels (100–118 dB SPL) in 2-dB steps (Ruggero et al. 1996; Temchin et al. 1997).
|
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
, 1987; Ruggero et al. 1996; Temchin et al. 1997b). FTCs were measured using an automated adaptive procedure (see METHODS) similar to that used by Kiang and Liberman (Kiang et al. 1970; Liberman 1978). Features of individual FTCs as functions of CF and SR
Figure 1 provides an overview of the variation of several FTC features (bandwidths [BWs], Q values, and chord slopes) in individual ANFs as functions of CF and SR, focusing on measurements at thresholds 30 dB higher than CF thresholds. In logarithmic coordinates, BWs increase with CF at constant but somewhat different rates at CFs higher and lower than 3–4 kHz, where a clear downward "jog" is evident (Fig. 1A). The origin of the "jog" in Fig. 1A is clarified on computation of partial BWs measured relative to CF (i.e., between CF and the lower or upper 30-dB cutoffs; see insets). These are plotted as functions of CF in Fig. 1, B and C. The lower (<CF) partial BWs (but not the upper partial BWs) exhibit a clear discontinuity at CFs between 3 and 4 kHz (compare red and green trend lines for CFs <3 kHz in Fig. 1B). The discontinuity is also clearly seen in a plot of the lower-limb chord slopes versus CF (Fig. 1E). (The curved "ceiling" for CFs <3 kHz in Fig. 1B and the "floor" for the same CFs in Fig. 1E are artifacts of the 80-Hz limit of FTC frequencies.)
|
; Liberman 1978), low-SR ANFs in chinchilla have narrower BWs and higher Q values than those of high-SR ANFs. Differences in frequency tuning between low- and high-SR ANFs are further explored in a companion paper (Temchin et al. 2008). The near-discontinuity of FTC shapes in the 3- to 4-kHz CF region is dramatically illustrated by plotting measures of "tip-to-tail ratio," thresholds re CF threshold at frequencies 0.5, 1, and 1.5 octaves lower than CF, against CF (Fig. 2). Except for the transition region (CFs 3–4 kHz), the tip-to-tail ratios vary minimally as a function of CF. For tip-to-tail ratios measured at –1 and –1.5 octaves re CF, slopes jump at the transition region between 20 and 30 dB for CFs <3 kHz to 40–50 dB for CFs >4 kHz.
|
Figure 3 illustrates how individual ANF FTCs were averaged within 2/3 octave CF bands (indicated by brackets) and combined with thresholds of input–output functions for responses to low-frequency tones (squares) to produce "synthetic" FTCs (thick traces). The two synthetic FTCs of Fig. 3, centered at CFs of 236 and 9,524 Hz, are representative of those for low- and high-CF ANFs. The thin traces and squares indicate thresholds averaged at fixed frequencies and the circles indicate frequencies averaged at fixed thresholds. At most frequencies the averages produced by the two methods coincide perfectly; however, the averages diverge at the highest frequencies of the FTC upper limbs, at which FTC slopes are steepest: the thin trace curves, resulting from averaging thresholds, have shallower slopes than the loci of the circles–this is an artifact. In general, functions such as FTCs have high-slope segments with well-defined abscissa positions (frequencies) but poorly defined ordinate positions (thresholds). As a result, even small errors in estimating frequencies for individual FTCs will yield FTC averages with slopes smaller than the slopes of the individual FTCs. For this reason, the upper limbs of the synthetic FTCs were obtained by averaging frequencies, as indicated by the coincidence of the thick traces and the circles.
The lower limbs of the synthetic FTCs were principally computed by averaging thresholds at fixed frequencies, as indicated by the full overlap of the thin and thick traces at most frequencies <CF. However, for frequencies 1 kHz, thresholds specified from FTCs were complemented by thresholds (squares in Fig. 3) determined from input–output functions measured for responses to tones (50 and 100 Hz and its multiples, 1,000 Hz). This was convenient because individual FTCs were often incomplete, lacking data for the lowest tail frequencies (note divergence between thin and thick traces at the lowest frequencies). Averages were computed over 2/3-octave CF bands (e.g., brackets in Fig. 3) centered in 21 1/3-octave steps.
Figure 4 shows smoothed FTCs of high-SR ANFs computed for 21 2/3-octave CF bands with CFs centered every 1/3-octave, from 187.5 Hz to 19.05 kHz. In general FTC shapes vary in an orderly manner, with approximately parallel lower and upper FTC limbs around the CFs. However, closer inspection reveals a specially wide separation of the FTC lower limbs in the frequency region 1–2 kHz, corresponding to the 3- to 5-kHz CF region separating ANFs with FTC with tails from those without tails.
|
The ratios of the partial bandwidths below and above CF (BWb/BWa; see insets of Fig. 1, B and C) provide measures of FTC asymmetry, which are plotted in Fig. 5 against CF. Exact symmetry is indicated by a ratio of 1, at CF 
900 Hz. For CFs <900 Hz, the ratios were <1, i.e., the upper-limb partial FTC BWs were wider than the lower-limb BWs; for CFs >900 Hz, the ratios were >1, i.e., the upper-limb partial FTC BWs were narrower than the lower-limb BWs. The asymmetry ratios grew monotonically with CF up to about 2 kHz. Monotonic growth was interrupted at CFs of 3–5 kHz, where prominent notches are evident. The notches coincide and are consistent with the discontinuities in the growth with CF of the 30-dB BW (Fig. 1A) and, especially, of the partial below-CF BW (Fig. 1B).
|
|
To facilitate appreciation of the changes of FTC shapes as a function of CF, Fig. 7 shows synthetic FTCs of high-SR ANFs plotted in logarithmic coordinates after normalization to CF threshold and CF. When plotted in this manner, FTCs with CFs 6 kHz are nearly identical (Fig. 7C), regardless of CF, and consist of three segments. A tip segment, within 30–40 dB of CF threshold, has lower- and upper-limb slopes of –60 and +120 dB/octave. The tip segment is flanked by a low-frequency ("tail") segment, with shallower slope, and a terminal high-frequency segment with very steep slope (hundreds of dB/octave).
|
The transition between low- and high-CF FTC shapes in the 3- to 4-kHz CF range (Figs. 1 and 2) is also illustrated in Fig. 7B: the shapes of the lower limbs of the FTCs change drastically and the distinction between tip and tail becomes increasingly evident. The salient features of the variation of FTCs with CF (Figs. 1, 2, 5, and 7) suggest that the chinchilla cochlea consists of distinct segments extending apically and basally from the region with CF 3–4 kHz. The dependence on CF of other aspects of ANF properties also suggests physiological differences between the apical and basal segments of the cochlea (see DISCUSSION).
Absence of high-frequency plateaus in ANF FTCs
High-frequency amplitude plateaus (arrows in Fig. 8, A and B), at which vibrations are linear, are routinely observed in BM vibrations at the base of the cochlea at levels as low as 70–80 dB SPL (e.g., Figs. 8, 9, and 11 of Ruggero et al. 1997 and middle panel of Fig. 2 of Cooper and Rhode 1997; see also Cooper and Rhode 1992; Narayan et al. 1998; Ruggero et al. 1990; Wilson 1992). Narayan et al. (1998) recorded from BM sites and ANFs in the same two chinchilla cochleae with open scalae tympani (see Ruggero et al. 2000) and showed that BM responses, but not ANF FTCs, exhibited high-frequency amplitude plateaus. In the present series of experiments, FTCs were measured for 56 ANFs (CFs: 1–11 kHz) from two cochleae in which the otic capsule was also perforated (as for recording BM vibrations) without causing any elevation of CAP thresholds. High-frequency plateaus were never found, even when (occasionally) stimuli exceeded CF threshold by 90 dB, confirming that the high-frequency plateaus in BM recordings are not artifacts associated with opening the otic capsule (Narayan et al. 1998; Ruggero et al. 2000).
|
The tips of tuning curves of ANFs and BM responses at the base of the cochlea are nearly identical in chinchilla (Rhode 2007a; Robles et al. 1986; Ruggero et al. 1990, 1997) and probably also guinea pig (Sellick et al. 1982). It is not yet certain whether ANF FTCs more closely match isodisplacement or isovelocity BM tuning curves or some combination thereof (e.g., Rhode 2007a). Comparisons of ANF and BM data obtained both in individual chinchillas (Narayan et al. 1998) and in different groups of animals suggest that ANF FTCs match BM isoresponse values intermediate between constant velocity and constant displacement but closer to constant velocity (Ruggero et al. 1990, 2000). Figure 8C updates the group comparisons using a synthetic ANF FTC with CF = 8.35 kHz (solid line in Fig. 8C), constructed in the same manner as the ANF FTCs of Fig. 4. Again, the average ANF FTC falls close to the BM isovelocity curve.
Previous comparisons of mechanical and neural tuning in the chinchilla cochlea were carried out for CFs in the 8- to 10-kHz range. Rhode and Recio have published a treasure trove of high-quality BM data from several additional basal sites of chinchilla cochleae (Rhode 2007a,b; Rhode and Recio 2000) that now permit comparing BM and ANF tuning for CFs as low as 6.4 kHz and as high as 12 kHz. Figure 8, A, B, and D shows comparisons of isoresponse curves from those cochleae with synthetic ANF FTCs constructed in the same manner as the ANF FTCs of Fig. 4, with CFs chosen to match the BM CFs. In every case, the tips of the ANF FTCs and of the BM isoresponse curves are identical. When the comparisons are carried out over sufficiently wide frequency ranges, the ANF FTCs match the BM isovelocity curves either nearly perfectly (Fig. 4A) or much more closely than the isodisplacement curves (Fig. 4B). In other words, high-pass filtering with slopes approaching 6 dB/octave occurs between BM displacement and spike generation in ANFs.
Relationship between frequency tuning in ANFs and BM vibrations at the apex of the cochlea
Figure 9 compares the frequency tuning of neural responses and mechanical vibrations for apical sites of the chinchilla cochlea with nominal CFs of 500 and 600 Hz (see Table 1 of Rhode and Cooper 1996). The solid lines indicate isovelocity curves (30 and 5 µm/s) for two chinchilla cochleae (computed from isodisplacement curves in Fig. 12 of Rhode and Cooper 1996). The dashed lines indicate synthetic ANF FTCs, constructed in the same manner as those of Fig. 4, for CFs comparable to those of the BM responses. The lower and upper limbs of the neural and mechanical tuning curves have similar slopes. However, the similarity of the lower limbs is probably partly an artifact: since the mechanical data were obtained in unsealed cochleae, the mechanical lower-limb slope is spuriously enhanced at a rate of –6 dB/octave (Dong and Cooper 2006). ANF FTCs have well-defined, moderately sharp tips, whereas the mechanical tuning curves have ill-defined and blunt tips. The BWs at 10 dB above the minimum are >50% larger for the mechanical tuning curves (523 and 686 Hz) than for the ANF FTCs (309 and 457 Hz). The ANF FTCs have Q10 values of 1.37 and 1.46, whereas the mechanical tuning curves have Q10 values of 0.77 (CH35) and 0.97 (CH33), computed on the basis of the nominal CFs, 500 and 600 Hz.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
In chinchilla, ANF FTC shapes undergo abrupt changes in the 3- to 4-kHz CF region: 1) when normalized to CF, FTCs with higher CFs are nearly identical, regardless of CF (Fig. 7C), whereas FTCs with CF <3–4 kHz change systematically with CF, particularly in their upper limbs (Fig. 7A); 2) the slopes of the lower limbs of the FTCs change abruptly, roughly from about –25 dB/octave for CFs <3–4 kHz to –70 dB/octave for higher CFs (Figs. 1E and 7). Abrupt changes in the lower limb of FTCs were previously described for gerbil in the same CF region (Ohlemiller and Echteler 1990; Schmiedt 1989) and, as noted by Schmiedt (1989), probably also exist in cat (see Fig. 14 of Liberman 1978 and Fig. 3 of Javel 1994).
To the extent that FTCs reflect BM vibrations and recalling that each octave of CF subtends an approximately fixed distance on the BM (Eldredge et al. 1981; Greenwood 1990; Müller et al. 2008), the similarity of FTCs at the base of the chinchilla cochlea (Fig. 7C) implies that the envelopes of the BM traveling wave are identical and that the number of wavelengths in the traveling waves are the same, regardless of frequency. The existence of this property of cochlear mechanics—"scaling symmetry"—was apparently first conjectured by Zweig (1976) on the basis of Rhode's earliest BM data for squirrel monkey (Rhode 1971). In chinchilla, scaling symmetry applies to CFs >4 kHz, corresponding to the basal third of the cochlea (Eldredge et al. 1981; Müller et al. 2008) but does not apply to the remainder, i.e., the apical 2/3 of the cochlea (Fig. 7, A and B).
Other differences between cochlear responses for CFs higher and lower than 3–4 kHz
Systemic administration of furosemide alters FTC shapes differently across the 3- to 4-kHz CF boundary (Sewell 1984): tip-to-tail ratios are much reduced for FTCs of ANFs with CFs >4 kHz but less so or not at all for lower CFs. The CF-specific effect of furosemide on high-CF ANFs is due to a corresponding effect on BM vibrations at the base of the cochlea (Ruggero and Rich 1991): furosemide temporarily abolishes the active process, reducing sensitivity and compressive nonlinearity at CF. The lesser effect of furosemide on FTCs of ANFs with CF <3 kHz suggests that amplification and CF-specific compression play lesser roles in apical regions than in basal regions of the cochlea.
Differences in the strength and CF specificity of BM compressive nonlinearity across the 3- to 4-kHz CF boundary probably explain why putative "BM" input–output functions derived from responses of ANFs are less compressive for CFs <4 kHz than for higher CFs (Cooper and Yates 1994), may account for the weaker modulation of ANF CF responses by low-frequency tones in low-CF ANFs than in high-CF ANFs (see Fig. 8 in Temchin et al. 1997b), and may help to explain why the increases of CF thresholds induced by cochlear cooling are larger in high-CF ANFs than in low-CF ANFs (Ohlemiller and Siegel 1994). In addition to differences in frequency tuning and its lability across the 3- to 4-kHz CF boundary, the timing of ANF responses also changes abruptly around the same CF region: the phases of responses to low-frequency tones (600 Hz) undergo a shift amounting to nearly radians (Ruggero and Rich 1983, 1987; Ruggero et al. 1996) and the onset delays of "impulse responses" measured using Wiener kernels jump by 0.3–0.5 ms (see Fig. 15A of Recio-Spinoso et al. 2005).
Implication for low-frequency suppression of the near-velocity sensitivity of excitation in high-CF ANFs
Because suppression of BM responses to CF tones by low-frequency tones requires suppressor displacement magnitudes at least as large as the responses to the CF tones (Geisler and Nuttall 1997), the existence of neural suppression of CF tones by nonexcitatory low-frequency tones (Cai and Geisler 1996; Fahey and Allen 1985; Temchin et al. 1997b) has led to questioning whether this neural phenomenon has a BM correlate (Rhode 2007b), or to postulating the existence of "synaptic suppression" in low-SR ANFs (Cai and Geisler 1996). In fact, 4–6 dB/octave high-pass filters interposed between BM vibrations and the receptor potentials of inner hair cells can fully account for neural suppression of CF tones by nonexcitatory low-frequency tones, especially in the case of low-SR ANFs [see companion paper (Temchin et al. 2008)], that are relatively insensitive (see Cheatham 2008; Temchin et al. 1997b).
Tuning, compressive nonlinearity, and amplification at low-CF sites of the chinchilla cochlea
The tuning discrepancies between mechanical and neural responses at low-CF sites (Fig. 9) may indicate the existence of an apical "second filter" interposed between organ of Corti vibrations and neural excitation. Evidence for such a "second filter" comes principally from recordings in well-sealed guinea pig cochleae, where the magnitudes of apical vibration are essentially low-pass (rather than band-pass) in nature (Dong and Cooper 2006). Another possibility is that the apparent broad tuning of apical mechanical vibrations is partly due to abnormally weak amplification caused by surgical trauma. At apical sites of the chinchilla cochlea, compression extends over the entire frequency range of responses, so that tuning hardly changes as a function of stimulus level (Rhode and Cooper 1996). Therefore it is appropriate to measure amplification as the difference between the peak magnitudes of responses to low- and high-level stimuli (see Robles and Ruggero 2001). Using this definition, amplification at basal sites of the chinchilla cochlea with CF of 9–10 kHz amounts to, at most, 46 dB (see Table 1 of Robles and Ruggero 2001). At apical sites of the chinchilla cochlea, amplification has been reported as 14–18 dB (Rhode and Cooper 1996), although an independent estimate based on Fig. 2 of Rhode and Cooper (1997) indicates amplification of about 30 dB. Therefore it is possible that in normal chinchilla cochleae amplification at the apex is weaker than that at the base by only 16 dB (i.e., 46 minus 30) or less.
ANF FTCs in different species
To a first approximation, the shapes of the FTCs of ANFs and their dependence on CF in chinchilla are similar to the patterns found in other species. In chinchilla and cat, thresholds converge at low frequencies (see Figs. 4 and 8 of Kiang 1984). In most species, high-CF ANF FTCs have distinct tip segments around CF, with relatively steep slopes, and tail segments at low frequencies, with relatively flat slopes. However, tails may be lacking in ANF FTCs of macaque monkey (Joris et al. 2006). The transition between tail and tip is smooth and monotonic in chinchilla (Figs. 4 and 7), gerbil (Ohlemiller and Echteler 1990; Schmiedt 1989), guinea pig (Evans 1972; Robertson and Johnstone 1979), rat (el Barbary 1991), mouse (Taberner and Liberman 2005), and rabbit (Borg et al. 1988), but includes a notch in cat FTCs (see Figs. 2, 3, 7, and 8 in Kiang and Moxon 1974; and Figs. 5 and 12 in Javel 1994). Javel (1994) described a break in the upper limb of high-CF ANFs of cat at 20–35 dB re CF threshold, which seems to coincide in level with the inflections of the upper limbs of chinchilla FTCs (Fig. 7). The upper limbs of low-CF ANF FTCs of cat often include "shoulders" marking the transition between the tip and "high-frequency tails" (Javel 1994; Kiang 1984). Such shoulders are not seen in FTCs of low-CF chinchilla ANFs.
Regardless of overall FTC shape, the Q10 values of the FTC tips increase systematically with increasing CF in all mammalian species (e.g., Fig. 6). Taberner and Liberman (2005) showed that the Q10 values of ANF FTCs measured with identical automated procedures in mouse, gerbil, guinea pig, chinchilla, and cat are similar over the CF range 0.7–20 kHz (Fig. 11 of Taberner and Liberman 2005). Ruggero and Temchin (2005) argued that such similarity may also extend to squirrel monkey and humans in spite of striking differences in cochlear lengths (Fig. 6 of Ruggero and Temchin 2005). Nevertheless, their Fig. 6A does show differences between the Q10 values for chinchilla and other species, particularly for high CFs (Ruggero and Temchin 2005). Specifically, in the 10-kHz region Q10 values ranged from 4.6 for chinchilla to 6.3 for squirrel monkey (a New-World primate). An even larger difference may exist between chinchillas and macaques (Old-World monkeys). Our analysis (not shown) of a plot of Q10 versus CF for Macaca irus and Macaca mulatta (Fig. 1 of Nomoto 1980) yields an average Q10 of 9.7 at CFs of about 10 kHz (albeit with large variance: SD = 5.3). Although it is uncertain whether those findings in macaque (based on FTCs measured using "audiovisual" criteria) are fully comparable with findings in other species (based on FTCs obtained with automated procedures), they are consistent with a recent abstract reporting that Q10 and Q40 values in macaque are larger than those in cat (Joris et al. 2006). Enhanced frequency tuning in primates, especially those native to the Old World, is of interest in the context of the unresolved controversy on whether humans (Old-World primates) have exceptionally sharp cochlear tuning (Ruggero and Temchin 2005; Shera et al. 2002).
Summary and conclusions
; Ruggero et al. 1996) and the lability of FTC shapes (Sewell 1984), also change substantially. Such changes suggest that BM vibrations and/or their translation into neural excitation differ substantially between apical and basal segments of the cochlea. ; Temchin et al. 1997b). |
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. A. Ruggero, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-3550 (E-mail: mruggero{at}northwestern.edu)
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Cai Y, Geisler CD. Suppression in auditory-nerve fibers of cats using low-side suppressors. II. Effect of spontaneous rates. Hear Res 96: 113–125, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cheatham MA. Comment on "Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae" [J Acoust Soc Am 121: 2805–2818, 2007]. J Acoust Soc Am 123: 602–605, 2008.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cooper NP, Rhode WS. Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts. Hear Res 63: 163–190, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cooper NP, Rhode WS. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea. J Neurophysiol 78: 261–270, 1997.
Cooper NP, Yates GK. Nonlinear input–output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: variations with characteristic frequency. Hear Res 78: 221–234, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Dallos P, Harris D. Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 41: 365–383, 1978.
Dong W, Cooper NP. An experimental study into the acousto-mechanical effects of invading the cochlea. J R Soc Interface 3: 561–571, 2006.
el Barbary A. Auditory nerve of the normal and jaundiced rat. II. Frequency selectivity and two-tone rate suppression. Hear Res 54: 91–104, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Eldredge DH, Miller JD, Bohne BA. A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 69: 1091–1095, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Evans EF. The frequency response and other properties of single fibres in the guinea-pig cochlear nerve. J Physiol 226: 263–287, 1972.
Fahey PF, Allen JB. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 77: 599–612, 1985.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Geisler CD, Nuttall AL. Two-tone suppression of basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the guinea pig cochlea using "low-side" suppressors. J Acoust Soc Am 102: 430–440, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 87: 2592–2605, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Javel E. Shapes of cat auditory nerve fiber tuning curves. Hear Res 81: 167–188, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Joris PX, Ramirez CL, Mc Laughlin M, van der Heijden M. Spectral and temporal properties of the auditory nerve in Old-World monkeys. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 29: 302–303, 2006.
Kiang NY, Liberman MC, Levine RA. Auditory-nerve activity in cats exposed to ototoxic drugs and high-intensity sounds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 85: 752–768, 1976.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kiang NY, Moxon EC. Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 55: 620–630, 1974.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kiang NYS. Peripheral neural processing of auditory information. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Sensory Processes. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1984, sect. 1, vol. III, pt. 2, p. 639–674.
Kiang NYS, Moxon EC, Levine RA. Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural Hearing Loss, edited by Wolstenholme GEW, Knight J. London: Churchill, 1970, p. 241–268.
Liberman MC. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J Acoust Soc Am 63: 442–455, 1978.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Müller M, Hoidis S, Smolders J. A physiological frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 31: 73–74, 2008.
Narayan SS, Temchin AN, Recio A, Ruggero MA. Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae. Science 282: 1882–1884, 1998.
Nomoto M. Representation of cochlear innervation patterns in single auditory-nerve fiber responses. Jpn J Physiol 30: 31–40, 1980.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ohlemiller KK, Echteler SM. Functional correlates of characteristic frequency in single cochlear nerve fibers of the Mongolian gerbil. J Comp Physiol A Sens Neural Behav Physiol 167: 329–338, 1990.[Medline]
Ohlemiller KK, Siegel JH. Cochlear basal and apical differences reflected in the effects of cooling on responses of single auditory nerve fibers. Hear Res 80: 174–190, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Recio-Spinoso A, Temchin AN, van DP, Fan Y-H, Ruggero MA. Wiener-kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. J Neurophysiol 93: 3615–3634, 2005.
Rhode WS. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 49: 1218–1231, 1971.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rhode WS. Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6–9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae. J Acoust Soc Am 121: 2792–2804, 2007a.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rhode WS. Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae. J Acoust Soc Am 121: 2805–2818, 2007b.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rhode WS, Cooper NP. Nonlinear mechanics in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea in vivo. Audit Neurosci 3: 101–121, 1996.
Rhode WS, Cooper NP. Nonlinear mechanisms in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea. In: Diversity in Auditory Mechanics, edited by Lewis ER, Long GR, Lyon RF, Narins PM, Steele CR, Hecht-Poinar E. Singapore: World Scientific, 1997, p. 318–324.
Rhode WS, Recio A. Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 107: 3317–3332, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Robertson D, Johnstone BM. Aberrant tonotopic organization in the inner ear damaged by kanamycin. J Acoust Soc Am 66: 466–469, 1979.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Robles L, Ruggero MA. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81: 1305–1352, 2001.
Robles L, Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input–output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. J Acoust Soc Am 80: 1364–1374, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ruggero MA. Physiology and coding of sound in the auditory nerve. In: The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, edited by Popper AN, Fay RR. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992, p. 34–93.
Ruggero MA, Narayan SS, Temchin AN, Recio A. Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 11744–11750, 2000.
Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Chinchilla auditory-nerve responses to low-frequency tones. J Acoust Soc Am 73: 2096–2108, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Timing of spike initiation in cochlear afferents: dependence on site of innervation. J Neurophysiol 58: 379–403, 1987.
Ruggero MA, Rich NC. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci 11: 1057–1067, 1991.[Abstract]
Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Recio A, Narayan SS, Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101: 2151–2163, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Robles L, Shivapuja BG. Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 87: 1612–1629, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ruggero MA, Rich NC, Shivapuja BG, Temchin AN. Auditory-nerve responses to low-frequency tones: intensity dependence. Audit Neurosci 2: 159–185, 1996.
Ruggero MA, Temchin AN. Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 18614–18619, 2005.
Salvi R, Perry J, Hamernik RP, Henderson D. Relationships between cochlear pathologies and auditory nerve and behavioral responses following acoustical trauma. In: New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, edited by Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R. New York: Raven Press, 1982, p. 165–188.
Schmiedt RA. Spontaneous rates, thresholds and tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in the gerbil: comparisons to cat data. Hear Res 42: 23–35, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sellick PM, Patuzzi R, Johnstone BM. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 72: 131–141, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sewell WF. The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hear Res 14: 305–314, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shera CA, Guinan JJ, Oxenham AJ. Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3318–3323, 2002.
Taberner AM, Liberman MC. Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. J Neurophysiol 93: 557–569, 2005.
Temchin AN, Rich NC, Ruggero MA. Frequency-threshold curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 20: 152, 1997a.
Temchin AN, Rich NC, Ruggero MA. Low-frequency suppression of auditory nerve responses to characteristic frequency tones. Hear Res 113: 29–56, 1997b.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Temchin AN, Rich NC, Ruggero MA. Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity. J Neurophysiol doi:10.1152/jn.90639.2008.
Wang J, Powers NL, Hofstetter P, Trautwein P, Ding D, Salvi R. Effects of selective inner hair cell loss on auditory nerve fiber threshold, tuning and spontaneous and driven discharge rate. Hear Res 107: 67–82, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wilson JP. Cochlear mechanics. In: Auditory Physiology and Perception, edited by Cazals Y, Demany L, Horner K. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1992, p. 71–84.
Zweig G. Basilar membrane motion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 40: 619–633, 1976.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. N. Temchin, N. C. Rich, and M. A. Ruggero Threshold Tuning Curves of Chinchilla Auditory Nerve Fibers. II. Dependence on Spontaneous Activity and Relation to Cochlear Nonlinearity J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2899 - 2906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
