|
|
||||||||
Brain Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1761
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rector, David M., Gina R. Poe, Morten P. Kristensen, and Ronald M. Harper. Light scattering changes follow evoked potentials from hippocampal Schaeffer collateral stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 1707-1713, 1997. We assessed relationships of evoked electrical and light scattering changes from cat dorsal hippocampus following Schaeffer collateral stimulation. Under anesthesia, eight stimulating electrodes were placed in the left hippocampal CA1 field and an optic probe, coupled to a photodiode or a charge-coupled device camera to detect scattered light changes, was lowered to the contralateral dorsal hippocampal surface. Light at 660 ± 10 (SE) nm illuminated the tissue through optic fibers surrounding the optic probe. An attached bipolar electrode recorded evoked right hippocampal commissural potentials. Electrode recordings and photodiode output were simultaneously acquired at 2.4 kHz during single biphasic pulse stimuli 0.5 ms in duration with 0.1-Hz intervals. Camera images were digitized at 100 Hz. An average of 150 responses was calculated for each of six stimulating current levels. Stimuli elicited a complex population synaptic potential that lasted 100-200 ms depending on stimulus intensity and electrode position. Light scattering changes peaked 20 ms after stimuli and occurred simultaneously with population spikes. A long-lasting light scattering component peaked 100-500 ms after the stimulus, concurrently with larger population postsynaptic potentials. Optical signals occurred over a time course similar to that for electrical signals and increased with larger stimulation amplitude to a maximum, then decreased with further increases in stimulation current. Camera images revealed a topographic response pattern that paralleled the photodiode measurements and depended on stimulation electrode position. Light scattering changes accompanied fast electrical responses, occurred too rapidly for perfusion, and showed a stimulus intensity relationship not consistent with glial changes.
A number of studies have shown a topographical arrangement of neural activation within the dorsal CA1 region of the hippocampus (Amaral and Witter 1989 Six cats were anesthetized with 25 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium and maintained at a constant anesthesia level with intravenous drip of 5 ml pentobarbital sodium in 250 ml lactated saline (0.6 ml/min). A saline-filled catheter measured esophageal pressure for respiratory assessment. Needles placed in both forelimbs recorded electrocardiogram. A stereotaxic frame was used to stabilize the head and to allow accurate electrode placement. A 12 × 7-mm opening was made in the skull over each hippocampal structure. The overlying cortex was suctioned and a 2 × 4 array of eight bipolar stimulating electrodes was lowered to the left dorsal hippocampal surface. The anterior/medial electrode was targeted to coordinates A5.5, L3.25, H10.5 (Berman 1968
Figures 3-5 show data from one animal (C3681) to illustrate the electrical and optical responses to stimulation. Other animals showed similar responses with different regional effects. Variations in stimulus response across animals may represent differences in probe or electrode placement or differences in the arrangement of collateral projections between animals. Stimulation produced a complex population spike, evoked potential, and afterpotential on the metal electrodes (Fig. 3). A very fast component of the reflectance response developed within 5 ms of the stimulus artifact. Stimulating electrodes produced characteristic responses with each current setting (Fig. 4). The amplitude of the reflectance fast component (50-200 ms) increased with increasing stimulus intensity until a level was reached at which further stimulus intensity increases produced a decrease in the reflectance response amplitude.
Evoked light scattering changes occurred with fast and slow time components. The complex nature of the response indicates that a combination of mechanisms underlies the optical changes. The peak of the fast response first increased and then decreased with increasing stimulation current, indicating that inhibitory mechanisms may be recruited at higher stimulus intensities. Different stimulation sites elicited characteristic response patterns, and sites with peak response amplitudes suggest a structural connectivity of the Schaeffer collaterals. The images in Fig. 8 show a stationary pattern in which components of the image increased and decreased in amplitude, and the stationary patterns indicate that the changes may be generated by groups of cells that act in synchrony rather than in a sequential manner.
Mechanisms
Multiple time components in the optical response indicate that several processes may be responsible for light scattering changes observed within in vivo preparations. Neural activation elicits a number of optically relevant changes, each with characteristic temporal signatures. Activated neurons demonstrate modifications in refractive index concurrent with membrane potential fluctuations that alter light scattering and may contribute to the majority of the rapid changes observed in these studies (Cohen and Keynes 1971 Comparison with electrical measurements
Hippocampal cellular interactions that produce electrical responses in vivo are complex. For example, interactions between pyramidal cells and inhibitory interneurons set up a system of spreading activation and inhibition. Thus, multiple peaks on the evoked response show a combination of initial activation and recurrent inhibition and activation from collaterals. Multiple peaks were not observed on light scattering signals. The multiple peaks on the electrical signals may represent signals detected by electrodes through volume conduction, and do not have a comparable representation on the optical signal. The tissue volume through which light scattering changes can be detected depends largely on illumination wavelength, with longer wavelengths penetrating through more tissue. For 700-nm illumination, detectable light scattering is limited to 500 µm (Malonek et al. 1990 Schaeffer collateral projection mapping
Multiple stimulation electrode positions provided a course projection map of Schaeffer collaterals. Two electrode positions, E1 and E7, produced the largest response at low stimulus currents and may be aligned along laminar projection pathways (Amaral and Witter 1989 Summary
Evoked light scattering changes occur with a time course similar to that of the evoked electrical response. The rapid components were most likely governed by cell conformation and swelling changes, whereas slow changes may result from a combination of neural, glial, and blood effects. The results provide the opportunity to record fast neural events in vivo that correspond to evoked responses or synchronized slow-wave activity.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
), including specific locations that exhibit activity patterns dependent on the animal's position within its environment (O'Keefe and Dostrovski 1971
). Typically, these studies are performed with arrays of microelectrodes or multiple placements of one electrode (Rawlins and Green 1977
) that contain minimal information about the spatial location of the cell, or with tract tracing procedures with limited temporal resolution. Optical procedures provide substantial spatial visualization advantages over electrical measurements for assessing neural activation and offer insights into cellular mechanisms, such as interactions between large numbers of cells, that are difficult to examine with microelectrode techniques. Voltage-sensitive dyes have been successfully used to determine the arrangement of cellular activation from a large number of neurons with the use of imaging procedures. However, these studies have been limited to reduced preparations (Cohen 1973
) or cortical surface structures for short time periods because of dye toxicity (Arieli et al. 1995
).
), cortical structures in intact animals and humans (Frostig et al. 1990
; Grinvald et al. 1986
; Haglund et al. 1992
), and subcortical structures in freely behaving animals (Rector and Harper 1991
; Rector et al. 1993a
,b
, 1994
, 1995
). Such optical changes originate from several slow physiological processes, including transformations in chromophores such as hemoglobin and cytochrome oxidase. Rapid optical changes originate from shifts in tissue refraction by membrane reconformation and cellular swelling, which can occur as quickly as voltage changes (Cohen and Keynes 1971
; Landowne 1993
).
). However, light scattering changes can occur as rapidly as individual action potentials and show two components in rat neurohypophysis activation, a fast membrane-protein-related response that precedes peak voltage change and a slower ionic exchange response (Salzberg et al. 1985
). Ionic-related swelling also occurs in superposition with action potentials (Tasaki and Byrne 1992
). However, studies of rapid optical changes related to cell swelling, without the use of dyes, have been previously limited to in vitro preparations.
![]()
METHODS
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
). Each electrode was separated by 1 mm. The left opening was subsequently filled with artificial cerebral spinal fluid, sealed with bone wax, and covered with dental acrylic.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Schematic drawing of the optical probe shows a high-sensitivity photodiode or charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (a) coupled to an image conduit (b) that is placed on the surface of the hippocampus and receives scattered light. Illumination light is provided by flexible optic fibers (c) attached around the image conduit perimeter and transmitting light from a 660-nm light-emitting diode (d). Concurrent electrical measurements are made from a wire electrode (e) that extends 0.5 mm beyond the image surface.

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 2.
Four successive coronal sections, separated by 1 mm, illustrate placement of 8 stimulating electrodes (left) and optical probe and electrical recording electrode (right). Stimulation output to each electrode is controlled by a 1 of 8 relay selector circuit, which is controlled by a computer. The computer also stores the CCD camera output and signals from the polygraph amplifiers for photodiode and electrical measurements, which are digitized by an A/D converter. Bottom right corner: successive 60-µm coronal slices through the hippocampal structure were scanned into a computer and a dorsal view of the hippocampus was reconstructed. White circles: stimulating electrode placement (E1-E8, left) and photodiode and electrical recording positions (right).
).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 3.
Electrical (thin black line) and optical (thick gray line) responses for stimulating electrode E1 at 100 µA current are plotted over 2,000- and 40-ms time periods around the stimulus (animal C3681). Stimulus artifact (bottom,
) is followed by an early population spike on the electrical trace and a corresponding dip in reflectance. Top: longer-latency electrical postsynaptic potential and corresponding drop in reflectance on the optical signal. Decreased reflectance corresponds to increased tissue activation. Vertical lines: SE for each time point from an average of 150 trials.
![]()
RESULTS
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 4.
Electrical and optical responses for stimulating electrode position E1 at 6 current levels show a rise in the optical response from 20 to 100 µA stimulating current that declines with further increases in current (animal C3681). The peak electrical response ceases to increase beyond 200 µA stimulation current and it changes in shape.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 5.
Responses from stimulating electrode E1-E8 at 100 µA stimulus current show that positions E1 and E7 produce the largest response (animal C3681). Stimulating electrode positions E3 and E4 produce the smallest responses. Bottom: dorsal view of the cat hippocampus with superimposed stimulating (left) and recording (right) electrode positions. Circle diameter on the right side: effectiveness of the position for eliciting an evoked response on the right side. Thus larger circles (E1 and E7) represent the lowest stimulus currents needed to elicit a maximal response.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 6.
Summary response levels for all stimulating positions (E1-E8) at 6 current levels (20-400 µA) across all animals. Reflectance values have been inverted for comparison with electrical values. Positive traces: peak values for electrical (black) and optical (gray) signals that diverge at stimulating current levels >200 µA. Negative traces: nadir values that are more correlated for all current levels. Vertical lines: SE of the peak values at each stimulus current level. Asterisks: significant difference (P < 0.05, Student's t-test) in normalized electrical and optical peak values.

View larger version (89K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 7.
Averaged images from the period of peak evoked response for all stimulating positions (E1-E8) were subtracted from averaged images collected during sham stimuli. Difference images show patterns of activation from the dorsal hippocampal surface (animal C3684). Intensity values are pseudocolored such that yellow to red represents increased activation (decreased reflectance) and blue to purple represents decreased activation (increased reflectance) with an absolute range of ±0.1% after correcting for camera baseline adjustments.

View larger version (133K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 8.
Averaged images during 100-µA stimulation of electrode E7 (animal C3763) show a similar pattern of activated regions from frame to frame, but with underlying variations in amplitude throughout the response. Stimulation occurs during the frame outlined in red. Frames represent an average of 150 trials at each 10-ms interval before and after stimulation, subtracted from an average frame at the same time point collected during an equivalent number of sham stimuli. To reduce the number of displayed images, every 3rd frame is displayed. Pseudocoloring is the same as described for Fig. 7.
![]()
DISCUSSION
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
; Roper et al. 1992
; Tasaki and Byrne 1992
). Light reflectance is altered by hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation state changes that show slow temporal responses to tissue activation (Raichle et al. 1976
). Hemoglobin changes are best observed with green light, however, and may contribute only to the slow response component (Perkampus 1971
). Other slow metabolic trends include cytochrome oxidase conformational changes that alter absorbance of much shorter wavelength light. Glial cells swell among activated tissue as they absorb excess interstitial ions (MacVicar and Hochman 1991
; Walz and Hinks 1985
). The glial response occurs over seconds to minutes, as opposed to activity of neurons, which shows changes within a millisecond. Axons, dendrites, and smaller interneurons exert greater proportional volume change on discharge and may affect reflectance to a greater extent than larger cells.
), whereas electrically evoked potentials can travel several centimeters through brain tissue and skull depending on the magnitude of the response. This finding demonstrates the advantage of light measurement procedures, which can record the spatial organization of local changes in neural activity with less contamination by volume conduction effects from surrounding tissue than is the case with electrical measurements.
; Ikeda et al. 1989
; Tamamaki and Nojyo 1990
). Images collected during the peak evoked response reveal a topographic arrangement of patches and columns that differs with each position of the stimulating electrode. Because our imaged area was relatively small, the images do not show large areas of inactivation and activation in the same frame, as would have been expected if we had imaged across several functional columns (Rector et al. 1993b
).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank S. Sampogna and the Brain Research Institute Microscopic Techniques Laboratory for assistance in preparing the post mortem tissue for histological analysis. We also thank Xilinx University Program for donating tools necessary for developing hardware to rapidly digitize camera images.
This research was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-22418. G. R. Poe was supported by a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Fellowship.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address reprint requests to R. M. Harper.
Received 24 January 1997; accepted in final form 14 May 1997.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-C. Yao, A. Foust, D. M. Rector, B. Barrowes, and J. S. George Cross-Polarized Reflected Light Measurement of Fast Optical Responses Associated with Neural Activation Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 4170 - 4177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Kay Evidence for Chelatable Zinc in the Extracellular Space of the Hippocampus, But Little Evidence for Synaptic Release of Zn J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6847 - 6855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. DeSoto, M. Fabiani, D. C. Geary, and G. Gratton When in Doubt, Do it Both Ways: Brain Evidence of the Simultaneous Activation of Conflicting Motor Responses in a Spatial Stroop Task J. Cogn. Neurosci., May 1, 2001; 13(4): 523 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Macey, C. A. Richard, D. M. Rector, R. K. Harper, and R. M. Harper State influences on ventral medullary surface and physiological responses to sodium cyanide challenges J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 1919 - 1927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |