|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 84 No. 3 September 2000, pp. 1168-1179
Copyright ©2000 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1317
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Larsen, Peter D., Craig D. Lewis, Gerard L. Gebber, and Sheng Zhong. Partial Spectral Analysis of Cardiac-Related Sympathetic Nerve Discharge. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1168-1179, 2000. We have studied the relationship between pulse synchronous baroreceptor input (represented by the arterial pulse, AP) and the cardiac-related rhythm in sympathetic nerve discharge (SND) of urethan-anesthetized cats by using partial autospectral and partial coherence analysis. Partial autospectral analysis was used to mathematically remove the portion of SND that can be directly attributed to the AP, while partial coherence analysis was used to removed the portion of the relationship between the discharges of sympathetic nerve pairs that can be attributed to linear AP-SND relationships that are common to the nerves. The ordinary autospectrum of SND (ASSND) and coherence functions relating the discharges of nerve pairs (CohSND-SND) contained a peak at the frequency of the heart beat. When the predominant mode of coordination between AP and SND was a phase walk, partialization of the autospectra of SND with AP (ASSND/AP) left considerable power in the cardiac-related band. In contrast, when the predominant mode of coordination between AP and SND was phase-locking, there was virtually no cardiac-related activity remaining in ASSND/AP. Partialization of CohSND-SND with AP reduced the peak coherence within the cardiac-related band in both modes of coordination but to a much greater extent during phase-locking. After baroreceptor denervation, CohSND-SND at the cardiac frequency remained significant, although a clear peak above background coherence was no longer apparent. These results are consistent with a model in which the central circuits controlling different sympathetic nerves share baroreceptor inputs and in addition are physically interconnected. The baroreceptor-sympathetic relationship contains both linear and nonlinear components, the former reflected by phase-locking and the latter by phase walk. The residual power in ASSND/AP during phase walk can be attributed to the nonlinear relationship, and the residual peak in partialized nerve-to-nerve coherence (CohSND-SND/AP) arises largely from nonlinearities that are common to the two nerves. During both phase walk and phase-locking, in addition to common nonlinear AP-SND relationships, coupling of the central circuits generating the nerve activities may contribute to CohSND-SND/AP because significant CohSND-SND was still observed following baroreceptor denervation.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sympathetic nerve
discharge (SND) contains a strong cardiac-related rhythm in
baroreceptor-innervated cats. The cardiac-related discharges of
different sympathetic nerves are highly correlated as indicated by
ordinary coherence values approaching one (Barman et al.
1992
; Gebber et al. 1990
; Kocsis
1995
). The tight linkage is manifested by a sharp peak at the
cardiac frequency in the nerve to nerve coherence function
(CohSND-SND) that rises above background. This
peak is eliminated by surgical baroreceptor denervation (Gebber
et al. 1994
). Two studies in the cat (Gebber et al.
1994
; Kocsis 1995
) and one in man (Kocsis
et al. 1999
) have used a computational technique called partial
coherence analysis to examine the mechanisms responsible for linkage of
the cardiac-related discharges of pairs of sympathetic nerves. This
method mathematically removes the portions of the cardiac-related SND
that are coherent to the arterial pulse (AP). We assume that AP
represents pulse-synchronous baroreceptor afferent nerve activity
(Gebber et al. 1994
; Kocsis 1995
).
Theoretically, partialization of the nerve to nerve coherence function
using AP (CohSND-SND/AP) will eliminate the peak
at the cardiac frequency if the central circuits governing the
discharges of the two nerves share baroreceptor inputs but are not
otherwise connected and the relationship between AP and SND is strictly linear (Bendat and Piersol 1966
; Rosenberg et al.
1998
). Contrary to this model of baroreceptor-sympathetic
interactions, there were numerous cases reported by Gebber et
al. (1994)
, Kocsis (1995)
, and Kocsis et
al. (1999)
in which partialization reduced but did not
eliminate the cardiac-related peak. This observation indicated that the
cardiac-related discharges of sympathetic nerves pairs were not solely
linearly correlated to pulse- synchronous baroreceptor inputs.
Additional factors contributing to residual coherence may include
coordination arising from physical interconnections of the central
circuits generating the activities of different nerves (Gebber
et al. 1994
) and nonlinear relationships between pulse
synchronous baroreceptor nerve activity and SND that are common to
different sympathetic nerves (Kocsis 1995
). There is evidence for some form of coupling between the central circuits generating SND in that after baroreceptor denervation, statistically significant CohSND-SND at frequencies near the
heart rate is still observed (Gebber et al. 1994
;
Kocsis et al. 1990
).
In the accompanying paper (Lewis et al. 2000
), we
observed two modes of coordination between AP and SND in the
cardiac-related band, phase walk and phase-locking. The phase walk was
characterized by a progressive cycle-by-cycle change in phase angle
between peak systole and SND. This relationship may be viewed as
nonlinear. In contrast, during phase-locking the range of phase angles
is narrow, but the variation is apparently random. This relationship may be viewed as linear. On the basis of these observations, the current study was designed to answer two questions. First, what proportion of cardiac-related SND is the consequence of the nonlinear phase walk? Second, does the nonlinear phase-walk account for instances
in which nerve-to-nerve coherence function partialized by AP
(CohSND-SND/AP) contains a peak exceeding
background at frequencies near the heart beat? To address the first
question, we used partial spectral analysis, comparing the power in the autospectrum of SND before (ASSND) and after
partialization using AP (ASSND/AP). To address
the second question, we used partial coherence analysis as outlined in
the preceding text.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental subjects and anesthesia
Two groups of cats were used in this study. The first group of
24 cats of either sex (weight range 2.3-4.1 kg) were initially anesthetized with 2.5-3.5% isoflurane in oxygen. Following
cannulation of a femoral vein, urethan (1.2-1.4 g/kg iv) was
administered, and isoflurane inhalation was terminated. This dose range
of urethan has been reported to maintain a surgical level of anesthesia
for a period of 8-10 h (Flecknell 1987
), which exceeded
the duration of our experiments. Blood pressure was measured from a
catheter inserted into the femoral artery. The cats were paralyzed and artificially ventilated with room air, and a bilateral
pneumothoracotomy was performed. End tidal CO2
was maintained between 3.5 and 4.0% by adjusting the parameters of
ventilation. Rectal temperature was maintained near 38°C using a heat
lamp. As previously described (Barman et al. 1992
),
potentials were monophasically recorded with bipolar platinum
electrodes from the central ends of the cut postganglionic sympathetic
inferior cardiac nerve (CN) and vertebral nerve (VN) near their exits
from the left stellate ganglion and the left postganglionic sympathetic
renal nerve (RN). Nerve recordings were made with a band-pass filter
set at 1-1000 Hz (Grass Instruments 7P3 preamplifier), so that
envelopes of multiunit spikes appeared as slow waves (Barman et
al. 1992
; Cohen and Gootman 1970
). We recorded
an 80-s epoch of data and then performed baroreceptor denervation by
bilateral sectioning of the carotid sinus, aortic depressor and vagus
nerves (Barman et al. 1992
). Sectioning of these nerves
eliminated the cardiac-related rhythm in SND and the inhibition of SND
produced by raising blood pressure with a bolus intravenous injection
of norepinephrine. Following baroreceptor denervation, we recorded a
further 80-s epoch of data.
The second group of 10 cats was used to compare AP-SND phase angles at
different steady-state levels of blood pressure described in the
accompanying paper (Lewis et al. 2000
). These cats were anesthetized
and ventilated as described in the preceding text, and the baroreceptor
nerves were intact. Blood pressure was measured from the brachial
artery, and the CN activity was recorded. Blood pressure was controlled
at various steady-state levels by altering the parameters of a
phenylephrine infusion.
The All-University Committee on Animal Use and Care of Michigan State University approved all protocols used in these experiments.
Data analysis
FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS. Spectral analysis was performed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) after SND had been low-pass filtered at 100 Hz. The sampling rate of 200 Hz gave a resolution of 0.2 Hz/bin. The power density spectra (autospectra) and ordinary coherence functions (normalized cross spectra) were averages of 32 5-s data windows, with a 50% overlap. The autospectrum of a signal shows how much power is present at each frequency and the coherence function measures the strength of correlation (scale 0-1.0) of two signals. The spectra are displayed over 0-10 Hz.
Partial autospectral and coherence analyses were performed using the algorithms of Jenkins and Watts (1968)
|
|
|
0.1 on a scale of 0 to 1 is
statistically significant when 32 windows are averaged (Benignus
1970TIME SERIES ANALYSIS.
Sympathetic nerve activity was digitally filtered (symmetric,
nonrecursive band-pass filter with a Lanczos smoothing function, RC
Electronics, Santa Barbara, CA), with a band-pass width of 4 Hz, and
the center frequency was matched to that of the sharp peak at the
frequency of the heart beat in the autospectrum of SND (Lewis et
al. 2000
). Following filtering we made cycle-by-cycle measurements of the interval (ms) between the peak of the AP and the
next peak of sympathetic nerve activity as described in the accompanying paper (Lewis et al. 2000
). The interval
between the peak of the AP and the next peak of nerve activity was
converted to a phase angle (
) in degrees using the formula
|
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Coherence values before and after partialization with AP and baroreceptor denervation and autospectral power in the cardiac-related band before and after partialization with AP were compared using a Student's paired t-test. Comparisons of values between groups were performed using unpaired t-test. Statistical tests were performed using Statview 5.0 (Abacus Concepts). Coherence values were Z-transformed before the statistical comparisons were made.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 1 shows the relationships between CN, VN, and RN discharges and AP in a baroreceptor-innervated cat. The original recordings in Fig. 1 (top right) demonstrate that the discharges of CN, VN, and RN were related in a 1:1 fashion to AP. Consequently, most of the power in ASSND was concentrated in a narrowband around the cardiac frequency, which is referred to as the cardiac-related band (see ASSND Fig. 1, 2nd row). In ASAP (Fig. 1 top left), and to a lesser extent in ASSND (Fig. 1, 2nd row), in addition to the peak at the cardiac frequency, there are peaks at harmonics of the heart rate. The ordinary coherence functions demonstrate that there was significant coherence between SND and AP (Fig. 1, 3rd row) and between nerve pairs (Fig. 1, bottom row) at the frequency of the heart rate and at higher harmonics of the heart rate.
|
Partialization of the autospectra of SND with AP removes the component of the ASSND that is coherent with ASAP. Two patterns of results were noted. The first of these is illustrated in Fig. 2. Here the ASSND (top row) shows a major peak at the cardiac frequency. After partialization with AP (2nd row), a large portion, but not all, of the cardiac-related peak is removed for all three nerves. The residual peak in the ASSND/AP indicates that there is activity in all three nerves in the cardiac-related band that was not coherent to activity in the AP. The residual power peaked at a lower frequency than in the original ASSND (3.4 vs. 3.8 Hz). Power in the cardiac-related band of the ASSND/AP represented 34, 37, and 40% of the original power in the cardiac-related band of ASCN, ASVN, and ASRN, respectively. A residual peak containing >1% of the original cardiac-related power was observed in ASSND/AP in 14 of 24 experiments for all three nerves.
|
In the example shown in Fig. 2, partialization of the nerve-nerve coherence functions with AP produced a small reduction in peak coherence within the cardiac-related band (compare 3rd and 4th rows) and moved the peak to the same frequency as peak residual power in the ASSND/AP. The residual peak in CohSND-SND/AP exceeded background levels of coherence at frequencies >2 Hz.
The second type of outcome observed by partializing ASSND with AP is shown in Fig. 3. In this case, cardiac-related power was almost completely removed in ASSND/AP (residual cardiac-related power in ASCN/AP, 0.1%; ASVN/AP, 0.5%; and ASRN/AP, 0.3%). In 10 of 24 experiments, partialization of ASSND with AP removed >99% of the cardiac-related power for all three nerves.
|
In the case shown in Fig. 3, there was no clear peak in
CohCN-VN at the cardiac frequency (3rd row,
left), due to the high level of coherence at all frequencies >2
Hz. It is important to note that since the coherence function is a
normalized value it measures the correlation between the activity of
two signals at a given frequency, independent of the magnitude of that
activity (Bendat and Piersol 1966
). Partialization with
AP in this instance did not reduce coherence. For
CohCN-RN and
CohVN-RN, however, there was a peak in
coherence at the frequency of the heart beat (3rd row), and
this peak was substantially reduced by partialization with AP
(bottom).
The data from 14 experiments in which the ASSND/AP contained >1% residual cardiac-related power (group 1) and from the 10 experiments in which the ASSND/AP contained <1% residual cardiac-related power (group 2) are summarized in Table 1. There was no significant difference between these two groups with respect to mean arterial pressure, cardiac frequency, CohAP-SND, or peak CohSND-SND within the cardiac-related band. CohAP-SND values were not significantly different for the three nerves, and there was no difference between the CohSND-SND values for the three nerve pairs. For each of the three nerve pairs in both groups, CohSND-SND in the cardiac-related band was significantly reduced by partialization with AP. However, the reduction was significantly less for group 1 than for group 2 for each of the nerve pairs.
|
Figure 4 shows nerve to nerve coherence functions for the three nerves following baroreceptor denervation (CohSND-SND(Den)) superposed on to the same scale as CohSND-SND/AP. In Fig. 4A, which is from the same experiment as Fig. 2, CohSND-SND(Den) is lower than the CohSND-SND/AP at most frequencies and particularly within the cardiac-related band due to the elimination of the peak above background following sectioning of the baroreceptor nerves. CohSND-SND(Den) at the cardiac frequency was significantly lower than peak CohSND-SND/AP within the cardiac-related band in group 1 for each of the nerve pairs (Table 1). In Fig. 4B, which is from the same experiment as Fig. 3, there was little difference between CohSND-SND(Den) and CohSND-SND/AP. In group 2, statistically significant differences were not detected between CohSND-SND(Den) and CohSND-SND/AP at the cardiac frequency (Table 1).
|
We used time series analyses to investigate the mode of relationship
between AP and SND in all 24 baroreceptor-innervated cats. In the 14 cases in which we found residual cardiac-related power in the
ASSND/AP (group 1), phase walk was the
predominant mode of coordination between AP and SND. In the 10 cases in
which residual cardiac-related power in ASSND/AP
was <1% of control (group 2), phase-locking was the
predominant mode of AP-SND relationship. Figure
5, A and B,
illustrates a time series for 20-s data epochs taken from the
experiments shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. Positive and negative
values of phase angle refer to lags and leads of activity in the second
signal relative to the first. From top to bottom,
the time series in Fig. 5, A and B, show the phase angle between peak systole and CN, VN, and RN activities. In Fig.
5A a phase walk was observed for all three nerves, occurring over a portion of the cardiac cycle, with a period of ~3.3 s. The
range of the walk was 170, 160, and 220° for AP-CN, AP-VN, and AP-RN,
respectively. For all three nerves, the timing of the cardiac-related
slow wave was progressively delayed relative to peak systole from heart
beat to heart beat until reaching maximal values (AP-CN, 110°; AP-VN,
95°; and AP-RN, 175°) at which point a transition back to the
starting values (AP-CN,
50°; AP-VN,
55°; and AP-RN,
45°)
occurred more rapidly, generally within a few heart beats. In this
experiment, the walk was less regular for RN than for the other two
nerves. Heart rate was constant over this data epoch (240 beats/min),
and the blood pressure was stable (130/100 mmHg). In Fig.
5B, strong phase-locking was observed between each nerve and
the AP. The bands of phase angles were restricted to 55° for AP-CN,
50° for AP-VN, and 55° for AP-RN. Heart rate (210 beats/min) and
blood pressure (190/145 mmHg) were stable over the recorded epoch.
|
Figure 6, A and B,
illustrates the nerve to nerve relationships for the same 20-s epochs
that are shown in Fig. 5, A and B, respectively.
From top to bottom, time series in Fig. 6,
A and B, show the CN-VN, CN-RN, and VN-RN phase
relationships. Phase-locking was the predominant mode of coordination
between the cardiac-related slow waves for the three nerve pairs in
both experiments. The CN-VN phase angles were largely restricted to a
band from
20 to 20° in Fig. 6A and from
5 to 15° in
Fig. 6B. In both experiments, phase-locking of the
cardiac-related slow waves of CN and VN was tighter than that observed
for the other two nerve pairs as might be expected from the higher
CohCN-VN within the cardiac-related band and at
all frequencies >2 Hz (Figs. 2 and 3).
|
For the experiments in group 1, on average, there were no
significant differences in the percentages of residual cardiac-related power for the three nerves (ASCN/AP, 25 ± 13% of control; ASVN/AP, 23 ± 11% of
control; and ASRN/AP, 22 ± 11% of
control). Nevertheless, there were individual cases in which
partialization differentially reduced cardiac-related power. An example
of this is shown in Fig. 7. On the
left, from top to bottom, the time
series show the phase angle between peak systole and cardiac-related
slow waves of CN, VN, and RN discharges. The AP-CN and AP-VN time
series show phase walk starting at approximately
10°, with
progressive phase delays of the slow waves in SND relative to systole,
up to a maximum phase angle of ~100° before rapidly returning to
10° (range 110°). The AP-RN phase walk started at around
30° and consisted of progressive delays of RN to a maximal value of 40°
(range 70°). The walk was less regular for AP-RN than for the other
two nerves. The ASSND and the
ASSND/AP for the three nerves are given on the
right of the corresponding time series. Residual cardiac-related power
in ASCN/AP and ASVN/AP was
31 and 28% of control respectively, but the
ASRN/AP contained only 15% residual
cardiac-related power. This suggests that the range of the phase walk
may be related to the amount of residual cardiac-related power in
ASSND/AP.
|
For the 14 experiments in which ASSND/AP
contained residual cardiac-related power (group 1), there
was a statistically significant correlation between the range of the
phase walk, measured as the standard deviation of the phase angles
between AP and SND, and the residual cardiac-related power in
ASSND/AP (percent of control) for each of the
three nerves (CN, r = 0.72, P = 0.002;
VN r = 0.70, P = 0.003; RN
r = 0.70, P = 0.004). In addition,
there was a significant inverse correlation between
CohAP-SND at the cardiac frequency and the
residual cardiac-related power in ASSND/AP (CN r =
0.72, P = 0.002; VN
r =
0.69, P = 0.004; RN
r =
0.83, P = 0.0001). Neither the
range of the phase walk nor the CohAP-SND at the
cardiac frequency was correlated significantly with MAP (range 110-195
mmHg). The relationships between residual power and
CohAP-SND and range of the phase walk suggest
that CohAP-SND and range of phase angles may be
negatively correlated. In fact, Fig. 8
illustrates that the inverse relationship between
CohAP-SND and range of phase angles was very
similar for both the 14 cases in which the predominant mode of
coordination was phase walk (group 1) and the 10 cases in
which phase-locking (group 2) was observed. This observation
that CohAP-SND was dependent on the range of AP-SND phase angles independent of the mode of coordination is explained in the APPENDIX.
|
In 12 of the 14 experiments in group 1, residual power in ASSND/AP peaked at a frequency 0.4 Hz below that of the original cardiac-related peak in the ASSND. This observation may be related to the fact that in most cases, the phase walks were asymmetric, showing slow progressive delays of nerve slow waves relative to timing of systole (Figs. 5A and 7). In such cases, the slow-wave-to-slow-wave intervals during most of the phase walk were of longer duration (and thus at a lower frequency) than the systole-systole intervals. There were two instances in which residual power in ASSND/AP consisted of two distinct peaks, one below and one above the cardiac frequency. One of these cases is illustrated in Fig. 9. In this experiment, the initial peak in ASSND was at a frequency of 3.0 Hz, and the ASSND/AP show two clear peaks, one at 2.6 Hz, the other at 3.4 Hz. The larger of the two peaks was at the lower frequency. Figure 10 shows a 20-s time-series plot of AP-SND for the three nerves from this experiment. In this case, the phase walk involves progressive delays to a maximal phase angle followed by progressive shortening to a minimal phase angle for each of the three nerves and is therefore more symmetrical than the examples shown in Figs. 5A and 7. As a consequence, the intervals between successive peaks of cardiac-related slow waves in SND were longer than the AP-AP intervals in approximately the first half of the walk (as phase angle is increasing) and shorter in the second half (as phase angle is decreasing), resulting in residual power in ASSND/AP at frequencies both lower and higher than the heart rate. In this case, CohSND-SND/AP contained two peaks within the cardiac-related band at the frequencies of the two peaks in ASSND/AP (Fig. 9).
|
|
Steady-state blood-pressure changes
From the steady-state blood-pressure experiments in the
accompanying paper (Lewis et al. 2000
), we examined 18 epochs from 7 animals in which phase walk was the predominant mode of
AP-SND coordination, and 18 epochs from 10 animals in which strong
phase-locking was the predominant mode. In all 18 cases of phase walk,
ASCN/AP contained a residual cardiac-related
peak, with residual power ranging from 7 to 69% (mean 33%) of that in
the control autospectrum, ASCN. In all of the 18 epochs of strong phase-locking, ASCN/AP contained
<1% residual cardiac-related power. Figure
11 shows the data from one experiment
at three steady-state blood pressures. These data are from the example
shown in Fig. 5 of the accompanying paper. In Fig. 11, A-C,
the plots are, from left to right, time series of
cycle-by-cycle measurements of the phase angle of CN relative
to peak systole, ASCN, and
ASCN/AP. In Fig. 11A, recorded with a
systolic blood pressure near 114 mmHg, values of AP-CN phase angles
were scattered over 360°, and there is no evidence of a peak in
ASCN at the cardiac frequency, although a clear
peak is seen at 10 Hz. The emergence of a 10-Hz rhythm in SND at low blood pressures has been well characterized (Barman et al.
1992
). Because there was no discernable cardiac-related power,
partialization of ASCN with AP had no effect. In
Fig. 11B, the systolic blood pressure was raised to near 200 mmHg, and at this level of blood pressure, phase-locking was
predominant. The values of AP-CN phase angles were restricted to a band
from 0 to 90°. Under these conditions, there was a sharp
cardiac-related peak in ASCN, which was almost completely removed by partialization with AP. In Fig. 11C,
the systolic blood pressure was raised to near 280 mmHg, and under these conditions, a phase walk between 0 and 210° with a period of
~3.8 s was observed. Note that in this case the phase walk consists
of progressive delays in AP-CN phase angle followed by progressive
advances. There is a sharp peak at the cardiac frequency (3.4 Hz) in
ASCN and considerable residual cardiac-related
power is apparent in ASCN/AP (59% of control).
Note also that the residual power consists of two peaks, one at 3.0 Hz,
the other at 3.4 Hz, consistent with a phase walk involving both
progressive delays and progressive advances in AP-CN phase angle.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the accompanying paper, we have described two modes of
baroreceptor-sympathetic nerve coordination, phase walk and phase-lock, as reflected by the temporal relationship between SND and AP. The
former mode represents a nonlinear interaction of AP and SND, while the
latter represents a linear interaction (Lewis et al. 2000
). In this study, we have demonstrated that partialization of the autospectrum of SND with AP leaves considerable residual cardiac-related power when the predominant mode of coordination is
phase walk but removes virtually all cardiac-related power during
phase-locking. Residual cardiac-related power in
ASSND/AP results from activity in the
cardiac-related band of SND that is not coherent with the AP
(Jenkins and Watts 1968
; Rosenberg et al.
1998
). Thus while virtually all the cardiac-related SND is
coherent to AP during phase-locking, this is not the case during phase walk.
In the accompanying paper, the phase walk has been described in terms
of relative coordination, which is a characteristic feature of forced
nonlinear oscillators. We have suggested that the phase walk is caused
by the influence of a third factor on the AP-SND relationship, such as
blood pressure oscillations or an interaction with the respiratory
system (Lewis et al. 2000
), although such interactions
remain to be fully characterized and were not investigated in this
study. Whatever the mechanism generating the phase walk, the result is
a tendency for a significant portion (as much as 69%) of
cardiac-related SND to occur at a frequency distinct from that of the
heart rate. In most cases in the present study, cardiac-related
activity was attracted to a lower frequency, evidenced by a residual
peak in ASSND/AP at a frequency lower than that
of the heart rate. Such peaks are consistent with phase walk
characterized by progressive delays of cardiac-related sympathetic slow
waves relative to the timing of systole with abrupt snap backs from a
point of maximal delay.
Theoretically, relative coordination between two signals does not
result in any linear coherence (Hoyer et al. 1997
)
because one signal is attracted to, but never quite achieves, the
frequency of the other. Under these circumstances the phase walk is
through 360° (Kelso 1995
). In this sense, the AP-SND
phase walks that we have described do not fit the classical definition
of relative coordination since during phase walk there was still high
CohAP-SND at frequencies within the
cardiac-related band, and the phase walk occurred over <360°. Thus
it is probable that we never saw pure phase walk but rather a mixture
of phase walk and phase-locking. This may reflect the fact that our
system was never truly at a "steady state" in that the excitability
of the central sympathetic oscillator(s), and/or the strength of the
pulse synchronous baroreceptor input was continually changing in a
cyclic fashion.
The range of phase angles during phase walk was found to be predictive of the amount of residual cardiac-related power observed in ASSND/AP. When the phase angle between AP and SND changes progressively from one cycle to the next, then the frequency of SND is different from the heart rate (which in our experiments was essentially constant due to the vagolytic actions of gallamine and the sectioning of one cardiac sympathetic nerve). Thus the range of the phase angles in the phase walk is proportional to the time that the frequency of SND is divergent from the frequency of AP and therefore should be proportional to the amount of residual power in ASSND/AP in the cardiac-related band.
CohAP-SND was inversely related to the range of AP-SND phase angles irrespective of whether phase walk or phase-locking was the predominant mode of coordination between the two signals. In fact, the slopes describing these relationships were the same for both modes of coordination (see Fig. 8). The range of phase angles between AP and SND observed during phase-locking is proportional to the amount of random perturbation of the 1:1 relationship between the two signals. As mathematically derived in the APPENDIX, such randomness is as effective in reducing coherence between AP and SND as a nonlinearity producing a phase walk with a similar range of phase angles.
Given that phase walk and phase-locking with equivalent ranges of phase
angles result in the same CohAP-SND and that the
CohAP-SND determines the portion of
ASSND that is removed by partialization using
AP, then why is it that a phase walk resulted in considerable residual cardiac-related power, while the random fluctuations that
occur in phase-locking did not? The phase walk alters the frequency of
SND slightly from that of the heart rate but in a structured manner,
and this activity therefore rises above background to form part of the
cardiac-related band that is seen in ASSND/AP. Random perturbations of the AP and SND relationship should be as
effective in producing residual power as a nonlinearity (Bendat and Piersol 1966
). However, due to the apparently random
fluctuations in AP-SND phase angles during phase-locking the power in
ASSND/AP at any given frequency within the
cardiac-related band would be indistinguishable from background activity.
Gebber et al. (1994)
and Kocsis (1995)
have previously reported that CohSND-SND/AP
remains high within the cardiac-related band. Kocsis
(1995)
commented on the possibility of a nonlinearity contributing to residual coherence but did not elaborate on the nature
of the nonlinearity. Gebber et al. (1994)
proposed that physical interconnection (coupling) of the central circuits governing discharges of different sympathetic nerves might also lead to residual
CohSND-SND/AP in the cardiac-related band. We
have demonstrated that a nonlinearity is present in the relationship
between AP and SND and that this nonlinearity results in
residual cardiac-related power in ASSND/AP. The
interpretation of CohSND-SND/AP in the cardiac-related band needs to be reexamined in this light.
The phase walk that produces residual cardiac-related power in
ASSND/AP is also responsible for the peak in the
residual CohSND-SND/AP within the cardiac-related
band in group 1. It would seem logical to assume that the
nonlinear AP-SND relationship is the result of central circuits for all
three nerves responding similarly to their baroreceptor inputs.
However, commonality of response to shared baroreceptor inputs
cannot be the only factor involved in generating residual
CohSND-SND/AP because significant coherence remains following baroreceptor denervation (Gebber et al.
1994
; Kocsis et al. 1990
; also Table 1). This
would require either some other form of shared input (noise) or
physical interconnections to be present generating some coherence
between nerve pairs.
There is evidence for some noise affecting the relationship between SND and AP, particularly during phase-locking, in that there are apparent random variations in phase angles. However, nerve-to-nerve phase angles appear less disrupted by these random variations between SND and AP. This suggests that either the source of noise is common or that there are physical interconnections between the nerves leading to less apparent noise in the nerve-to-nerve relationship, either of which would produce residual CohSND-SND/AP. The relationship between these three factors may be very complex. For example, any nonlinearity in the AP-SND relationship may be shared not only because of common responses to similar inputs to the central circuits for different nerves but also because of physical interconnections between these circuits, therefore the extent to which each mechanism contributes to residual CohSND-SND/AP in the cardiac-related band cannot be stated.
In conclusion, there are two predominant modes of coordination between AP and SND, phase-locking and phase walk. To an extent, these two modes may always be coexistent. The effect of phase walk is to move a considerable portion of the cardiac-related activity to frequencies other than that of the heart rate, such that residual peaks are seen in ASSND/AP and in CohSND-SND/AP. However, during both modes of coordination, other factors must be involved in generating CohSND-SND/AP because there is still significant coherence at frequencies near the heart rate after sectioning of the baroreceptor nerves. Such factors may include physical interconnections between central circuits generating SND and common inputs of nonbaroreceptor origin.
| |
APPENDIX |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CohAP-SND was found to be inversely proportional to the range of AP-SND phase angles, and this relationship was the same for epochs that were predominantly phase walks and epochs that were predominantly phase-locked. This may be explained as follows.
The coherence function is defined as
|
CohS1-S2
1 and |CSS1-S2(f)|
is the amplitude of the cross spectrum
CSS1-S2(f).
The cross spectrum is defined as the Fourier transform of the cross
covariance function
|
S1-S2(u), is given by
|
S1 at time t and
xS2(t)
S2 at time t + u, where
u is the lag time.
xS1(t) and
xS2(t) are time varying
signals, and
S1 and
S2 are mean values.
Cross covariance is the second moment of the joint probability density function relating xS1and xS2. Coherence, therefore is directly dependent on the joint probability density function of xS1and xS2.
Assume a system of three signals x(t),
y1(t), and
y2(t) such that
|
|
|
1(k) is a
random variable with a uniform probability density function over (0,
), and
2(t) is a sawtooth
function given by
2(t) =
· frac(tf0/10) which also
has a uniform probability density function over (0,
).
[x(t) is an idealized approximation of the
reference AP, y1(t) is an
idealized approximation of a phase-locked signal with a noisy bandwidth
of 180°, and y2(t) is an
idealized approximation of a signal in a phase walk with a bandwidth of
180°.]
The expected phase differences between x and
y1 and between x and
y2 are identical due to the uniform
probability density functions of
1
and
2. It follows that the
joint probability functions, cross covariance functions and thus
coherence functions relating x to
y1 and x to
y2 will likewise be identical.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-13187.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: G. L. Gebber (E-mail: gebber{at}msu.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 22 February 2000; accepted in final form 15 May 2000.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
partial spectra, partial coherence and neuronal interactions.
J Neurosci Methods
83:
57-72, 1998[ISI][Medline].
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Marchenko and R. F. Rogers Selective loss of high-frequency oscillations in phrenic and hypoglossal activity in the decerebrate rat during gasping Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1414 - R1429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Gebber, M. Das, and S. M. Barman An Unusual Form of Phase Walk in a System of Coupled Oscillators J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 2004; 19(6): 542 - 550. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Das, G. L. Gebber, S. M. Barman, and C. D. Lewis Fractal Properties of Sympathetic Nerve Discharge J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 833 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Barman, P. J. Fadel, W. Vongpatanasin, R. G. Victor, and G. L. Gebber Basis for the cardiac-related rhythm in muscle sympathetic nerve activity of humans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2003; 284(2): H584 - H597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Badra, W. H. Cooke, J. B. Hoag, A. A. Crossman, T. A. Kuusela, K. U. O. Tahvanainen, and D. L. Eckberg Respiratory modulation of human autonomic rhythms Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): H2674 - H2688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Lewis, G. L. Gebber, S. Zhong, P. D. Larsen, and S. M. Barman Modes of Baroreceptor-Sympathetic Coordination J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1157 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||