|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 87 No. 2 February 2002, pp. 1046-1056
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
Départements de Pharmacologie et de Psychiatrie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Centre de Recherche Fernand Seguin, Université de Montréal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Congar, Patrice, Annie Bergevin, and Louis-Eric Trudeau. D2 Receptors Inhibit the Secretory Process Downstream From Calcium Influx in Dopaminergic Neurons: Implication of K+ Channels. J. Neurophysiol. 87: 1046-1056, 2002. Dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons possess D2-like somatodendritic and terminal autoreceptors that modulate cellular excitability and dopamine (DA) release. The cellular and molecular processes underlying the rapid presynaptic inhibition of DA release by D2 receptors remain unclear. Using a culture system in which isolated DAergic neurons establish self-innervating synapses ("autapses") that release both DA and glutamate, we studied the mechanism by which presynaptic D2 receptors inhibit glutamate-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Action-potential evoked EPSCs were reversibly inhibited by quinpirole, a selective D2 receptor agonist. This inhibition was slightly reduced by the inward rectifier K+ channel blocker barium, largely prevented by the voltage-dependent K+ channel blocker 4-aminopyridine, and completely blocked by their combined application. The lack of a residual inhibition of EPSCs under these conditions argues against the implication of a direct inhibition of presynaptic Ca2+ channels. To evaluate the possibility of a direct inhibition of the secretory process, spontaneous miniature EPSCs were evoked by the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin. Ionomycin-evoked release was insensitive to cadmium and dramatically reduced by quinpirole, providing evidence for a direct inhibition of quantal release at a step downstream to Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Surprisingly, this effect of quinpirole on ionomycin-evoked release was blocked by 4-aminopyridine. These results suggest that D2 receptor activation decreases neurotransmitter release from DAergic neurons through a presynaptic mechanism in which K+ channels directly inhibit the secretory process.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dopaminergic neurons possess
D2-type autoreceptors (Farnebo and Hamberger 1971
;
Missale et al. 1998
), which serve at least three
functions: 1) somatodendritic autoreceptors decrease
neuronal excitability (Chiodo and Kapatos 1992
;
Lacey et al. 1987
, 1988
); 2) terminal (i.e.,
presynaptic) autoreceptors reduce dopamine (DA) synthesis and packaging
(Onali et al. 1988
; Pothos et al. 1998
;
Wolf and Roth 1990
); 3) terminal
autoreceptors rapidly inhibit impulse-dependent DA release (Cass
and Zahniser 1991
; Kennedy et al. 1992
;
Stamford et al. 1991
). The cellular and molecular processes underlying the rapid presynaptic inhibition of DA release by
terminal D2 receptors remain unclear.
Three general classes of presynaptic mechanisms are thought to be
responsible for the modulation of neurotransmitter release by G
protein-coupled receptors (Bouron 2001
; Meir et
al. 1999
; Miller 1998
; Wu and Saggau
1997
) and could be involved in D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic
inhibition. A first mechanism is a direct inhibition of
Ca2+ channels in synaptic terminals. It has been
reported that through a D2-type receptor, DA can inhibit
somatodendritic voltage-dependent Ca2+
channels (VDCCs) in dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons (Cardozo and Bean 1995
). If a similar modulation occurs in nerve terminals, this could have a direct impact on DA release. This hypothesis is
currently untested. A second potential mechanism is a
K+ conductance increase in the presynaptic
terminal. This would lead indirectly to a decrease in
Ca2+ influx through action potential shunting.
Voltage-dependent K+ channels are
well-established effectors of somatodendritic D2 receptors
(Lacey et al. 1987
-1989
). Several
K+ conductances can be modulated by
somatodendritic D2 autoreceptors (Chiodo and Kapatos
1992
; Freedman and Weight 1988
; Kim et
al. 1995
; Lin et al. 1998
; Liu et al.
1994
; Roeper et al. 1990
; Sun et al.
2000
; Surmeier et al. 1993
; Tanaka et al.
1996
; Uchida et al. 2000
). The contribution of
such conductances to the action of terminal D2 autoreceptors has not
been clearly established. The K+ channel blockers
4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and tetraethylammonium (TEA) reduce
quinpirole-induced inhibition of [3H]DA release
in the striatal slice preparation (Cass and Zahniser 1991
). However, the significance of such results needs to be
investigated in a preparation allowing a more direct evaluation of
regulatory processes localized to nerve terminals. A third mechanism of
presynaptic inhibition that could be involved is a direct inhibition of
the secretory process in nerve terminals, downstream of
Ca2+ influx (Bouron 2001
;
Meir et al. 1999
; Miller 1998
;
Parnas et al. 2000
; Trudeau et al. 1996
;
Wu and Saggau 1997
). To our knowledge, the contribution
of such a mechanism to D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition in
DAergic neurons has never been directly tested.
Because the release of DA from nerve terminals does not evoke
detectable synaptic currents (Sulzer et al. 1998
;
present study), neither in vivo nor in vitro, its measurement poses a
technical challenge. Here we have taken advantage of a culture system
in which isolated DAergic neurons establish synapses that release glutamate in addition to DA. Such glutamatergic synaptic currents are
inhibited by terminal D2 receptor activation through a presynaptic site
of action (Joyce and Rayport 2000
; Sulzer et al.
1998
), thus providing an advantageous system to study terminal
D2 receptor function. In the present study, we specifically evaluated
the implication of presynaptic K+ channels and
the possibility of a direct modulation of the secretory process.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture
Single neuron microcultures were prepared using dissociated
ventral tegmental area (VTA) cells from neonatal rat pups, according to
recently described protocols (Bourque and Trudeau 2000
;
Michel and Trudeau 2000
) derived from Cardozo
(1993)
and Sulzer et al. (1998)
. Neurons were
plated onto preestablished midbrain astrocytic monolayers on
15-mm-diameter round precoated glass coverslips.
Astrocytes were prepared from the mesencephalon of cryoanesthetized neonatal (postnatal day 1-3) Sprague-Dawley rat pups. Cells were enzymatically dissociated using papain (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ) and were grown in basal medium Eagle with Earl's Salts (Gibco, Burlington, Ontario) supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, GlutaMAX-1 (Gibco), Mito + serum extender (VWR Canlab, Montreal, Quebec), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibco). Five days before plating neurons, astrocytes were trypsinized and plated at a concentration of 60,000 living astrocytes per milliliter on agarose-covered glass coverslips which had been previously sprayed with collagen/poly-D-lysine (each at 0.5 mg/ml) micro-droplets (50-150 µM in diameter). This permitted the establishment of small groups of isolated cells.
To prepare neurons, a 1- to 2-mm-thick coronal slice was cut at the level of the midbrain flexure. Two small blocks of tissue containing the left and right portion of the VTA were dissected out using a custom tissue micro-punch. After dissociation, neurons were diluted at a density titrated to optimize neuronal viability and the establishment of single neuron microcultures (80-100,000 living cells per milliliter) and plated onto astrocyte micro-islands. Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere and maintained in neurobasal A/B27 medium (Gibco) supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin, GlutaMAX-1 (Gibco), and 5% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT).
Electrophysiology and dye labeling
Electrophysiological experiments were performed at room
temperature on neurons maintained for 12-20 days in culture. Cultures were transferred to a custom-made small volume laminar perfusion flow
recording chamber mounted on an inverted microscope and continuously superfused using a gravity flow system (2.5-3 ml/min) with a standard extracellular bathing solution containing the following (in mM): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, 6 sucrose, 10 glucose, pH 7.4, 300 mOsm. Drugs were bath applied, with a delay between valve opening
and onset of drug action of approximately 15 s. Autaptic neurons
were recorded using the ruptured or perforated (amphotericin B 150-200
µg/ml) whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Patch pipettes (3-5 M
)
contained the following (in mM): 140 KMeSO4, 10 NaCl, 0.1 EGTA, 4 MgATP, 0.5 GTP (Tris salt), 10 HEPES, pH 7.4, 300 mOsm. Spontaneous miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs)
were recorded in the presence of 0.5 µM tetrodotoxin (TTX; Alomone
Labs, Jerusalem, Israel). Currents were recorded using a PC-501
patch-clamp amplifier (Warner Instruments Corp., Hamden, CT), filtered
at 1 KHz and digitized at 2-5 KHz using a Digidata 1200 A/D
converter (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) interfaced to a Pentium
PC and Pclamp 8 software (Axon Instruments). Junction potentials were
nulled before the establishment of the whole-cell configuration. The
capacitative compensation circuit of the amplifier was used to reduce
capacitative transients. Series resistance (typically 7-12 M
) was
corrected by 70-80%. During whole-cell recording, autaptic responses
were evoked by brief (1 ms) depolarizing voltage steps from a holding
potential (VH) of
50 mV, at a
frequency of 0.05 Hz. In DAergic neurons, this usually elicited an
"action current" followed by a 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX)-sensitive glutamate-mediated inward autaptic EPSC. In
non-DAergic neurons, autaptic currents displayed reversal potentials
close to
50 mV and were sensitive to 5 µM SR-95531, a
-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptor
antagonist (not shown; Michel and Trudeau 2000
).
Miniature synaptic currents were analyzed using MiniAnalysis 5.2 software (Synaptosoft, Leonia, NJ). Data in the text and figures are
expressed as mean ± SE. Unless otherwise indicated, data were statistically analyzed using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test with
a probability value of P < 0.05 used as an indication
of significant differences (*P < 0.05;
**P < 0.005).
Fluorescence imaging of intracellular Ca2+ transients
For experiments using dynamic fluorescence imaging of intracellular Ca2+ levels, cells were loaded for 30-45 min at room temperature with Fura-2 AM (5 µM) (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR). Calcium transients were elicited by extracellular stimulation delivered by a bipolar theta glass stimulating pipette filled with standard extracellular bathing solution. Fluorescence excitation at 340/380 nm was driven by a computer-controlled fast optical switch (DX-1000; Stanford Photonics, Palo Alto, CA). Fluorescence images were collected using a Gen-III+ intensified progressive line scan CCD camera (Stanford Photonics) at a frequency of 0.5 Hz, with minimal exposure times (264 ms) to minimize bleaching. Image acquisition and analysis was performed using Axon Imaging Workbench 4.0 (Axon Instruments).
Immunocytochemistry
In most of the patch-clamp and imaging experiments, the microdot location was marked after recording using blue fluorescent microspheres (Duke Scientific Corp., Palo Alto, CA) that were deposited using a patch pipette onto the agarose substrate, near the microdot. This facilitated the subsequent identification of the recorded DAergic neurons by post hoc immunofluorescent staining for tyrosine hydroxylase. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Tyrosine hydroxylase was localized using a monoclonal antibody (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) and Alexa-488 or Alexa-546-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes). Images of immunofluorescent labeling were acquired using a Hamamatsu Orca-II digital-cooled CCD camera using Esee and Isee software (Inovision Corp., Raleigh, NC). When required, stacks of images at different focal depths were acquired using a z-motor and reconstructed after deconvolution to reject out-of-focus signal.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Modulation of glutamatergic EPSCs by D2 receptors in isolated DAergic neurons
Considering that dopamine release does not evoke synaptic
currents, alternate approaches are required to study the
activity and modulation of the nerve terminals established by DAergic
neurons. Although techniques such as amperometry allow the detection of individual DA quanta at randomly selected release sites (Pothos et al. 1998
), it is difficult to confirm that such sites
represent bona fide nerve terminals. In addition, such recordings fail
to provide information on the overall efficacy of the release process in individual DAergic neurons. In the present study, we have thus taken
advantage of the ability of DAergic neurons in primary culture to
co-release glutamate (Joyce and Rayport 2000
;
Sulzer et al. 1998
) to monitor the effects of terminal
D2-type DA receptor activation on synaptic efficacy. Experiments were
performed on single neuron VTA microcultures (Bourque and
Trudeau 2000
; Michel and Trudeau 2000
;
Sulzer et al. 1998
) (Fig.
1A). After whole-cell
recording, the position of the neuron was marked by depositing blue
fluorescent microspheres and the identity of the neuron as DAergic
confirmed by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunofluorescence labeling
(Fig. 1A). During whole-cell recording, brief (1 ms)
depolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of
50 to +20 mV
evoked postsynaptic, CNQX-sensitive
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)
receptor-mediated autaptic EPSCs (Fig. 1B, see also Sulzer et al. 1998
). It is noteworthy that, as
previously reported by Sulzer et al. (1998)
, we did not
observe any component in the evoked autaptic response that was
sensitive to DA receptor antagonists (not shown), neither in ruptured
nor in perforated whole-cell patch-clamp modes. Direct application of
the selective D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (5 µM) also did not
evoke detectable somatodendritic membrane currents (not shown). These
observations suggest that under our experimental conditions,
somatodendritic D2-type DA receptors were either not present or not
effectively coupled to potassium channels.
|
However, bath application of quinpirole (5 µM) robustly and
reversibly decreased the peak amplitude of autaptic EPSCs in isolated DAergic neurons to 48.2 ± 2.4% of control (n = 64, P < 0.001, Fig. 1, C-E). Multiple
applications of quinpirole separated by a 10-min washout period
reproducibly inhibited EPSC amplitude (not shown). Although all neurons
that were sensitive to quinpirole were subsequently confirmed to be TH
positive, our cultures also contained a significant proportion of
GABAergic neurons and a variable proportion of TH-negative
glutamatergic neurons. Those TH-negative neurons were in all cases
insensitive to quinpirole [see GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic
currents (IPSCs), n = 5, Fig. 1E]. In all
further experiments, the sensitivity of a neuron to quinpirole thus
served as a valid marker of DAergic phenotype, as initially
demonstrated by Rayport et al. (1992)
. We nonetheless performed postrecording immunofluorescent identification of neurons in
most experiments.
In a subset of experiments, quinpirole was applied in the presence of the selective D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (5 µM). Although by itself sulpiride did not significantly change EPSC amplitude (90.3 ± 12.9% of control, n = 4, P > 0.05), it completely antagonized the inhibitory effect of quinpirole on EPSC amplitude (93.3 ± 2.1% of control, n = 4, P > 0.05, Fig. 1, D and E). Therefore the modulation of synaptic efficacy by quinpirole in this model is selectively mediated by D2-type DA receptors on DAergic neurons.
Implication of potassium conductances
We first investigated the possible implication of G protein-activated inward rectifier K+ (GIRK)-type conductances in the effect of quinpirole by using barium, a blocker of GIRK-type channels. Although barium at a maximally effective concentration (1 mM) did not significantly modify the amplitude of EPSCs (106.2 ± 11.8% of control amplitude, n = 7, P > 0.05), it slightly but significantly reduced the inhibitory effect of quinpirole (from 46.3 ± 9.8 to 31.0 ± 8.7% inhibition, n = 7, paired data, P < 0.01) (Fig. 2A-Fig. 3). Thus a significant fraction of the effect of quinpirole, about 30%, seems to be due to a modulation of presynaptic GIRK-type K+ channels.
|
|
We next used 4-AP to investigate the implication of voltage-dependent
K+ (Kv)
conductances in the presynaptic effect of quinpirole. Bath application
of 100 µM 4-AP, similar to barium, caused no reliable change in EPSC
amplitude by itself (99.7 ± 10.6% of control, n = 6, P > 0.05). However, 4-AP significantly and
reversibly reduced the effect of quinpirole (from 56.0 ± 9.6 to
16.2 ± 8.3% inhibition, n = 6, paired data,
P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B-Fig. 3). This effect
of 4-AP was only slightly increased at 1 mM (from 57.2 ± 9.4 to
12.0 ± 3.9% inhibition, n = 7, paired data,
P < 0.001) (Fig. 3), a concentration which also failed
to significantly increase EPSC amplitude (135.2 ± 23% of
control, n = 7, P > 0.05). It is
important to note that the block of quinpirole's ability to inhibit
EPSCs was not caused by some kind of "saturation" of evoked release due to the enhancement of EPSC amplitude by 4-AP. This is illustrated by the complete lack of correlation between the ability of 4-AP to
increase EPSC amplitude by itself and its ability to reduce quinpirole-mediated presynaptic inhibition, both at 100 µM
(r = 0.48, Pearson, P = 0.41) and at 1 mM (r =
0.58, Pearson, P = 0.17)
(Fig. 2D). Thus a major part of the effect of quinpirole (about 70%) implicates presynaptic 4-AP-sensitive
K+ channels.
In a final attempt to completely reverse the effect of quinpirole, we applied barium (1 mM) and 4-AP (1 mM) together. In the presence of these two blockers, some neurons showed a notable increase in EPSC amplitude (Fig. 2C), but on average, the amplitude of EPSCs was again not reliably increased (156.9 ± 33.8% of control, n = 5, P > 0.05). However, the inhibitory effect of quinpirole was completely and reversibly prevented (from 53.0 ± 6.9 to 1.8 ± 0.6% inhibition, n = 7, paired data, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2C-Fig. 3). Again, the block of quinpirole's ability to inhibit EPSCs was not caused by some kind of saturation of evoked release due to the enhancement of EPSC amplitude by 4-AP and Ba2+. This is illustrated by the complete lack of correlation between the ability of the combination of 4-AP and Ba2+ to increase EPSC amplitude by itself and its ability to reduce quinpirole-mediated presynaptic inhibition (r = 0.31, Pearson, P = 0.60) (Fig. 2D).
Because 4-AP blocks a wide variety of K+ channels
containing Kv subunits, it was of
interest to determine whether an antagonist with a narrower selectivity
would also block quinpirole-induced presynaptic inhibition in DAergic
neurons. We thus examined the effect of
-dendrotoxin (
-DTX), a
more selective blocker of Kv channels
(Coetzee et al. 1999
; Meir et al. 1999
).
Using 100 nM
-DTX, we failed to observe any significant increase in
EPSC amplitude (102.5 ± 6.6% of control, n = 5, P > 0.05) nor any decrease in the presynaptic effect
of quinpirole (from 55.9 ± 11.4 to 48.5 ± 8.4% inhibition,
n = 5, paired data, P > 0.05) (Fig.
3). In two of the five neurons tested, the quinpirole-induced
inhibition of EPSCs was first measured in control saline, then in the
presence of
-DTX, and finally again in the presence of 4-AP. In
those two neurons quinpirole induced a similar inhibition of EPSC
amplitude in the absence and in the presence of
-DTX, but its effect
was significantly blocked in the presence of 4-AP (from 48.5 ± 8.4 to 7.2 ± 4.2% inhibition, not shown). These results suggest
that quinpirole produces its presynaptic effect through modulation of
4-AP-sensitive but
-DTX-insensitive K+ channels.
Quinpirole does not affect Ca2+ influx into DAergic neurons
If one of the mechanisms through which quinpirole inhibits
autaptic EPSC amplitude in DAergic neurons is a direct inhibition of
presynaptic Ca2+ channels, then it would be
expected that at least a component of quinpirole's effect should
remain in the presence of the K+ channel
blockers. This was not observed in our experiments. Nevertheless, it
has been reported that DA can reduce somatodendritic voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in DAergic neurons (Cardozo
and Bean 1995
). We thus monitored electrically evoked
Ca2+ transients in the cell body and proximal
dendrites of isolated DAergic neurons loaded with Fura-2 AM to evaluate
whether quinpirole caused a generalized inhibition of voltage-gated
Ca2+ channels. Intracellular
Ca2+ transients were evoked by direct electrical
stimulation of neurons using a theta glass pipette (2-s trains at 10 Hz, 0.5-ms pulse duration) (Fig.
4C). Calcium transients of
constant amplitude could be evoked by successive stimulation trains
using this technique. Quinpirole did not significantly affect the peak
amplitude of these Ca2+ transients (93.3 ± 7.0% of control; n = 5; P > 0.05)
(Fig. 4, C and D). A similar small,
nonsignificant decrement was measured in TH-negative neurons
(93.20 ± 1.5% of control) (n = 7; not shown). Although intracellular Ca2+ was not quantified
directly in nerve terminals, an approach which would be difficult with
microcultures in which axons tend to bundle and run alongside
dendrites, this set of data supports the idea that quinpirole-induced
inhibition is largely independent of global modifications of
Ca2+ handling.
|
Absence of effect of quinpirole on spontaneous miniature synaptic events in DAergic neurons
To determine whether D2 receptors can directly inhibit the secretory process in DAergic neurons, we next investigated the effect of quinpirole on miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs), recorded in the presence of TTX (0.5 µM), in isolated DAergic neurons. In all experiments, the sensitivity to quinpirole of the evoked autaptic EPSC was first confirmed (in the absence of TTX), prior to the beginning of mEPSC recordings (Fig. 5A). In a preliminary set of experiments, we studied mEPSCs using 1- to 2-min sampling episodes; in these experiments, DAergic neurons were found to display highly variable but usually low levels of spontaneous synaptic activity [from 0 to 10 Hz; on average 1.5 ± 0.7 Hz (median 0.8 Hz, n = 13) (Fig. 5B)]. Due to this low and variable frequency, the analysis of the effect of quinpirole on the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous mEPSCs was performed using prolonged recordings (10 min control, 10 min quinpirole, 10 min wash). In these experiments, DAergic autaptic neurons still displayed variable and low levels of spontaneous synaptic activity [from 0.6 to 5 Hz; on average 2.6 ± 0.9 Hz; median value 1.6 Hz, n = 5 (Fig. 5B)]. Bath application of quinpirole did not decrease the basal frequency of mEPSCs. To the contrary, the frequency of spontaneous mEPSCs had a tendency to increase, although this did not reach statistical significance [153.9 ± 33.0% of control, n = 5, paired data, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.715 (Fig. 5, B and C)]. Cumulative probability distributions of mEPSC inter-event intervals were analyzed for each neurons using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test: three of the five neurons displayed a slight but significant (P < 0.01) shift of the distribution to the left (i.e., a small increase in frequency) while the two others displayed a slight but significant shift of the distribution to the right (i.e., a small decrease in frequency). Although in each tested neuron autaptic EPSC amplitudes were found to be robustly inhibited by quinpirole (not shown), the frequency of spontaneous mEPSCs in these same cells thus showed no systematic and quantitatively important chances. The mean amplitude of the mEPSCs was also not significantly modified by quinpirole (97.8 ± 2.2% of control, n = 5, paired data, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.34). Again, the cumulative probability distributions of mEPSC amplitudes were analyzed for each neuron: two of the five neurons displayed a slight but significant shift of the distribution to the left (i.e., a small increase in amplitude), while two others displayed a slight but significant shift of the distribution to the right (i.e., a small decrease in frequency) and the last one was not modified. Thus no systematic and quantitatively important change in mEPSC amplitude accompanied the inhibition of autaptic EPSC amplitude.
|
The failure of the marked inhibition of evoked EPSC amplitude to be
accompanied by a decrease in mEPSC frequency suggests that either the
basal state of the secretory process is not directly inhibited by D2
receptor activation or the inhibition only acts on
Ca2+-evoked exocytosis. To distinguish between
these possibilities, we enhanced the frequency of CNQX-sensitive mEPSCs
using the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin (2.5 µM).
Ionomycin is known to elicit neurotransmitter release by directly
producing an elevation of intraterminal Ca2+,
effectively bypassing the requirement for presynaptic VDCC activation (Angleson and Betz 2001
; Capogna et al.
1996
). Its effect is completely insensitive to the
Ca2+ channel blocker cadmium and thus independent
of the activation of Ca2+ channels in the
presynaptic terminal (Capogna et al. 1996
). In a first
set of experiments, we first verified that, under our experimental
conditions, the ability of ionomycin to increase mEPSC frequency was
indeed not significantly affected by blocking voltage-dependent
Ca2+ channels with cadmium. For each stimulation,
the ability of ionomycin to increase mEPSC frequency was expressed as a
difference score (delta) obtained by subtracting the number of mEPSCs
within a 60-s period of time before from that during the application of ionomycin, at the peak of the effect. A marked and reversible increase
of mEPSC frequency was observed following a brief (2 min) application
of ionomycin (from 3.0 ± 1.4 to 92.1 ± 12.6 Hz, n = 6, Fig.
6A). After a 10-min washout
and a complete recovery of mEPSC frequency, a second stimulation with
ionomycin was then performed in the presence of cadmium
(CdCl2, 100 µM, preapplied for 5 min). Cadmium
did not significantly change the ability of ionomycin to enhance mEPSC
frequency [from 5.0 ± 1.3 to 84.4 ± 14.2 Hz, not
significantly different from the first stimulation; n = 6, paired data, P > 0.05 (Fig. 6, A-C)].
These results thus confirm that ionomycin-induced neurotransmitter
release in isolated DAergic neurons is independent of presynaptic VDCC
activation. Under such conditions, the ability of an agent to modulate
ionomycin-evoked release should thus reflect an action on a process
downstream of Ca2+ influx through VDCCs.
|
We next investigated the effect of quinpirole on ionomycin-stimulated
mEPSCs. The neurons were first confirmed to show a robust and
reversible quinpirole-induced decrease in autaptic EPSC amplitude (not
shown). Then, after a washout period of
10 min, mEPSCs were recorded
in the presence of TTX. As described above, a marked and reversible
increase of mEPSC frequency was observed following a brief (2 min)
application of ionomycin [from 0.2 ± 0.1 to 23.4 ± 7.2 Hz,
n = 7 (Fig.
7A)]. After a 10-min washout
and a complete recovery of mEPSC frequency, a second stimulation with
ionomycin was then performed in the presence of quinpirole (5 µM,
preapplied for 1 min). Finally, after an additional 10-min washout of
quinpirole and ionomycin, a third application of ionomycin was
performed. The delta value of the stimulation with ionomycin in the
presence of quinpirole was compared with the mean delta value of the
first and third stimulations to account for any gradual rundown in the effectiveness of ionomycin to stimulate mEPSC frequency. We found that
quinpirole produced a profound inhibition of ionomycin-induced mEPSCs
[by 82.8 ± 5.2%; n = 7, paired data,
P < 0.05 (Fig. 7, A-C)].
Although the overall average amplitude of ionomycin-evoked mEPSCs was
not significantly decreased by quinpirole (Fig. 5C), an
analysis of the cumulative probability distribution of all events using
the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test nonetheless showed that the large decrease
in mEPSC frequency was accompanied by a very small decrease in mEPSC
amplitude in the presence of quinpirole [P < 0.001, n = 7 (Fig. 7B)]. This was likely due to a
reduction in the summation of mEPSCs that sometimes occurred at the
peak of ionomycin's effect.
|
These results indicate that D2-type autoreceptors located on presynaptic terminals can inhibit quantal glutamate release from VTA DAergic neurons by a mechanism that occurs at a step beyond Ca2+ influx through presynaptic VDCCs. These results are somewhat surprising considering that barium and 4-AP completely blocked quinpirole's ability to inhibit evoked EPSC amplitude (Figs. 2 and 3), leaving little place for an additional mechanism. One possibility is that both mechanisms could be somehow interdependent. To test this hypothesis, we determined the effect of 4-AP (1 mM) on the modulation of ionomycin-evoked mEPSCs by quinpirole. We found that 4-AP by itself significantly affected neither basal mEPSC frequency (0.8 ± 0.3 Hz, n = 5, P > 0.05) nor the effectiveness of ionomycin to trigger mEPSCs (to 20.8 ± 7.4 Hz, n = 5, P > 0.05). However, 4-AP completely blocked quinpirole's ability to inhibit ionomycin-evoked mEPSCs [8.0 ± 26.2% inhibition, n = 5, paired data, P > 0.05 (Fig. 7C)]. These results show that the inhibition of the secretory process by quinpirole in DAergic neurons is somehow dependent on 4-AP-sensitive K+ channels.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate the mechanism of D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic
inhibition, we have taken advantage of a VTA primary culture system in
which postnatally derived DAergic neurons establish functional synapses
that release both DA and glutamate (Bourque and Trudeau
2000
; Congar and Trudeau 1999
; Sulzer et
al. 1998
). One major advantage of this system is that the
release of glutamate at synapses generates prominent glutamate-mediated
fast EPSCs that can be readily measured by electrophysiological
techniques and that can serve as an index of the activity of the
synaptic terminals established by individual DAergic neurons.
In a first set of experiments, we have confirmed that, as previously
reported by Sulzer et al. (1998)
, autaptic EPSCs
recorded from isolated DAergic neurons are reversibly and reproducibly inhibited by the selective D2 agonist quinpirole, an effect that is
antagonized by the D2 antagonist sulpiride. Moreover, this effect was
specific to DAergic neurons, since autaptic responses evoked in
isolated TH-negative neurons were insensitive to quinpirole.
Implication of presynaptic K+ channels
Although the precise identification of the subtypes of
K+ channels implicated in D2-mediated presynaptic
inhibition was beyond the scope of the present study, our results
strongly suggest that two different types of potassium conductances
play a key role in this mechanism. A combined application of 4-AP and
barium, blockers of Kv-type and
GIRK-type K+ channels, respectively, completely
blocked quinpirole-mediated presynaptic inhibition. While 4-AP blocked
approximately 70% of the effect of quinpirole, barium blocked
approximately 30%. Moreover, we failed to observe any effect of
-DTX, a voltage-gated K+ channel blocker with
a narrower selectivity. This pharmacological profile is very similar to
that recently reported by Manzoni and Williams (1999)
,
who characterized a 4-AP-sensitive,
-DTX-insensitive mechanism
responsible for presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release by
µ-opioid receptors at excitatory afferents to DAergic neurons in VTA
slices. The sensitivity of presynaptic voltage-gated potassium channels
to
-DTX is variable and depends on the precise subunit composition
of the channels (for review see Coetzee et al. 1999
;
Meir et al. 1999
). The absence of effect of
-DTX
seems to exclude the implication of a large subset of the
Kv1 family.
Our finding of a prominent implication of 4-AP-sensitive
K+ conductances in the presynaptic effect of
quinpirole provides direct evidence supporting the hypothesis proposed
by Cass and Zahniser (1991)
that a major component of
the mechanism by which D2 autoreceptors decrease DA release involves
presynaptic K+ channels (see also Cass and
Zahniser 1990
). Our results also suggest that in addition to
4-AP-sensitive K+ channels, presynaptic GIRK-type
channels could also play a role. Although these channels are mostly
somatodendritic in neurons, their localization on nerve terminals in
some preparations has been recently suggested (Morishige et al.
1996
; Ponce et al. 1996
). To our knowledge, the
present study is the first to suggest the implication of
barium-sensitive GIRK-type channels in D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic
inhibition in DAergic neurons.
Although our results strongly suggest that presynaptic D2 receptors
inhibit evoked glutamate release in VTA DAergic neurons mainly through
the modulation of barium- and 4-AP-sensitive K+
channels located on nerve terminals, one cannot exclude off-hand the
possibility that quinpirole inhibits EPSC amplitude at least in part by
impairing action potential propagation at axonal branch points. 4-AP
may thus block quinpirole-induced presynaptic inhibition by
facilitating action potential propagation. Recent work has indeed
showed that 4-AP-sensitive K+ channels localized
in axons are able to modulate action potential propagation
(Debanne et al. 1997
, 1999
; Tan and Llano
1999
). Nevertheless, in our experiments, neither barium nor
4-AP, even applied together at a maximally effective concentration,
reliably and significantly enhanced autaptic EPSC amplitude by
themselves. This suggests that the control of action potential
propagation by barium and 4-AP-sensitive K+
conductances is probably quite weak in DAergic neurons under our
experimental conditions. In addition, this observation argues against
the possibility of some kind of "occlusion" of quinpirole's effect
because of a saturation of the neurotransmitter release process.
Finally, even if present, a mechanism implicating a change in action
potential propagation would not readily account for our data on the
modulation of mEPSCs.
Implication of presynaptic Ca2+ channels
Because DA receptors can directly inhibit
Ca2+ channels in a number of preparations
(Missale et al. 1998
), including acutely dissociated
midbrain neurons (Cardozo and Bean 1995
), the
possibility that a similar effect occurs in the nerve terminals of
DAergic neurons has to be considered. However, to our knowledge, this question has not been directly addressed in previous studies. Our
results are incompatible with the hypothesis that a direct modulation
of presynaptic voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels
plays a significant role. First, we found that in the presence of 4-AP
and barium, conditions that should not prevent direct
Ca2+ channel modulation, quinpirole fails to
cause any significant decrease in autaptic EPSC amplitude. Second,
although our Ca2+-imaging experiments do not
allow us to make strong conclusions about nerve terminals, they
nonetheless show that D2 autoreceptor stimulation fails to cause any
generalized inhibition of electrically evoked
Ca2+ influx in the cell body and proximal
processes of DAergic neurons. Finally, in experiments where ionomycin
was used to trigger cadmium-insensitive Ca2+-dependent exocytosis, under conditions where
voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel activation was
bypassed, the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole still caused a large
decrease in mEPSC frequency. Thus although we cannot completely exclude
the possibility of an indirect modulation of terminal
Ca2+ influx as an additional mechanism (for
example through the activation of terminal K+
conductances by D2 autoreceptors, leading to an indirect decrease in
action potential-evoked elevations of local Ca2+
concentration in synaptic terminals), a major component of presynaptic inhibition of transmitter release by D2 receptors seems to occur independently of a direct inhibition of Ca2+
channels, downstream of Ca2+ influx (see
following text). Interestingly, a very similar mechanism of presynaptic
inhibition depending on barium- and 4-AP-sensitive K+ conductances and independent of the modulation
of presynaptic Ca2+ channels, has also been
identified in the nucleus accumbens (inhibition of glutamate release by
cannabinoids) (Robbe et al. 2001
) and in the
periaqueductal gray (inhibition of GABA release by opioids) (Vaughan et al. 1997
).
Evidence for a direct inhibition of the secretory process
In contrast to its ability to reliably inhibit the amplitude of
the evoked EPSCs, quinpirole did not inhibit the frequency of
spontaneous mEPSCs. In the absence of additional data, this finding
could be interpreted as evidence for a lack of direct inhibition of the
secretory process in nerve terminals. However, two considerations
warrant a reconsideration of such a conclusion. First, considering the
relatively low basal spontaneous mEPSC frequency (median 1.6 Hz), it
may be considered that an inhibition of such a low frequency may be
hard to detect. A second consideration is that although basal release
may not be directly inhibited, this does not exclude that
Ca2+-evoked exocytosis may be inhibited at a late
step. This could happen for example if some aspect of the coupling of
exocytosis to Ca2+ sensing was inhibited by D2
receptor activation. Such a mechanism has recently been suggested to
explain the modulation of neurotransmitter release by the cAMP system
in nerve terminals (Sakaba and Neher 2001
;
Trudeau et al. 1998
). Compatible with this last
hypothesis, we found that quinpirole strongly inhibited the enhancement
of mEPSC frequency evoked by the Ca2+ ionophore
ionomycin. Such a method triggers Ca2+-dependent
exocytosis independently of the activity of presynaptic VDCCs
(Capogna et al. 1996
), as confirmed in the present
study. Taken together, our findings thus suggest that presynaptic
D2-type DA receptors inhibit a late step of glutamate exocytosis
through a mechanism closely related to the
Ca2+-dependent activation of the release
machinery. In light of our observations, it is interesting to note that
in a recent study, Koga and Momiyama (2000)
reported an
inhibitory effect of D2 receptor activation on mEPSC frequency in VTA
slices. They found that this inhibition was dependent on the external
Ca2+ concentration. If such manipulations also
modified basal intraterminal Ca2+ concentrations,
the mechanisms identified in the present report and in the work of Koga
and Momiyama may be similar.
In light of our finding of a complete block of quinpirole-mediated
inhibition of autaptic EPSCs by 4-AP and barium, our results with
ionomycin may be considered surprising: if the direct inhibition of
exocytosis was a separate mechanism, independent of the
K+ channel-dependent mechanism, one would expect
that in the presence of 4-AP and barium at least a component of
quinpirole's effect should remain. Our finding that 4-AP also blocked
the inhibition of ionomycin-evoked mEPSCs caused by quinpirole clearly
suggests that these two mechanisms are at least partially
interdependent and both implicate Kv
conductances. But how could a K+
channel-dependent modulation of the secretory process be mediated? Considering the now well-documented interaction between
voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and syntaxin, a
core protein of the secretory machinery (Catterall 1999
;
Kim and Catterall 1997
), one hypothesis, albeit highly
speculative, is that some 4-AP-sensitive K+
channels also directly interact with the secretory machinery and can
thus be involved in regulating the efficacy of exocytosis. Much
additional work will be required to test this possibility, but the
recent finding that some Kv channel
subunits indeed directly interact with syntaxin, a core protein of the
secretory machinery (Fili et al. 2001
), provides a
molecular basis for such a hypothesis.
The mechanism identified in the present study could potentially be
widely expressed. For example, activation of µ-opioid receptors in
periaqueductal gray slices inhibits the frequency of miniature IPSCs
(mIPSCs) through a mechanism that is sensitive to 4-AP but independent
of changes in Ca2+ influx (Vaughan et al.
1997
). Similarly, we have recently shown that in cultured
mesencephalic GABAergic neurons, µ-opioid receptor activation inhibits the frequency of spontaneous mIPSCs as
well as mIPSCs evoked by ionomycin through a mechanism sensitive to 4-AP (A. Bergevin, D. Girardot, M. J. Bourque, and L.-E. Trudeau, unpublished observations). Both of these observations could be explained by a K+ channel-dependent inhibition of
the secretory process.
In conclusion, the present set of results provide evidence that K+ channels present on DAergic nerve terminals play a fundamental role in presynaptic inhibition of neurotransmitter release by D2-type receptors. In addition, our experiments suggest for the first time that D2 receptors can also directly inhibit the secretory process in nerve terminals at a step downstream from Ca2+ influx. The finding that these two mechanisms are apparently interrelated suggests a novel mechanism implicating a K+ channel-dependent modulation of the secretory process.
Relevance of glutamate release by DAergic neurons to DA release
D2-mediated presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release has been
previously documented in several structures including the nucleus
accumbens (O'Donnell and Grace 1994
), the striatum
(Hsu et al. 1995
, 1996
; Kalivas and Duffy
1997
; see also review of Nicola et al. 2000
),
the olfactory bulb (Berkowicz and Trombley 2000
;
Hsia et al. 1999
), the supraoptic nucleus (Price
and Pittman 2001
), the subthalamic nucleus (Shen and
Johnson 2000
), the hippocampus (Hsu 1996
), and
the VTA (Koga and Momiyama 2000
). Although this modulation has been defined as presynaptic in all studies, its molecular mechanisms were never clarified. The mechanism identified here could potentially shed light on the observations reported in the
preceding reports.
Although we cannot reject the possibility that the mechanism that we
have characterized here by measuring glutamate release from DAergic
neurons is at least partly different from the mechanism regulating
actual DA release, a number of arguments suggest that our experimental
strategy provides information that is pertinent to both glutamate and
DA release. First, glutamate release in cultured DAergic neurons is
regulated by the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor
receptor (Bourque and Trudeau 2000
) and by the D2
receptor (Joyce and Rayport 2000
; Sulzer et al.
1998
; present study), two receptors that also regulate DA
release in vivo. Second, we have recently shown that the vast majority
(>85%) of synaptophysin-positive nerve terminals established by
cultured DAergic neurons express VMAT-2, the vesicular DA transporter
(Bourque and Trudeau 2000
). In addition, Sulzer
et al. (1998)
have reported that the vast majority of synaptic
varicosities established by cultured DAergic neurons contain both
glutamate and DA. Thus although it is not known whether DA and
glutamate are released from the same synaptic vesicles, these results
suggest that most terminals established by cultured DAergic neurons
have the capacity to store and release both glutamate and DA in a
manner that is regulated through some of the same presynaptic
mechanisms. Although the extrapolation of the present results to the
release of DA may need additional experiments using different
approaches, our work provides valuable information on the cellular
mechanism of presynaptic inhibition mediated by D2-type receptors.
In conclusion, the present results provide new information on D2 receptor signaling in nerve terminals and suggest the possible existence of a novel type of presynaptic mechanism. The elucidation of this presynaptic mechanism may contribute to a more complete understanding of the physiology and pathology of DAergic systems in the brain.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank F. Michel and C. Jomphe for valuable help with some of the electrophysiological and immunohistochemical experiments. We are grateful to I. Jutras and M.-J. Bourque for technical assistance. Helpful comments on this manuscript were provided by Drs. A. Bouron, J.-C. Lacaille, G. Massicotte, and D. Lévesque.
This work was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the EJLB Foundation. L.-E. Trudeau is a Michael Smith scholar of the CIHR. P. Congar was supported by the Neuroscience Canada Foundation and by the Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central of the Université de Montréal.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: L.-E. Trudeau, Dépt. de Pharmacologie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada (E-mail: louis-eric.trudeau{at}umontreal.ca).
Received 4 June 2001; accepted in final form 24 October 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|