|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 88 No. 2 August 2002, pp. 1016-1025
Copyright ©2002 by the American Physiological Society
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0345
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Jones, Michael S. and
Daniel S. Barth.
Effects of Bicuculline Methiodide on Fast (>200 Hz) Electrical
Oscillations in Rat Somatosensory Cortex.
J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1016-1025, 2002.
Fast
oscillatory activity (more than ~200 Hz) has been attracting
increasing attention regarding its possible role in both normal brain
function and epileptogenesis. Yet, its underlying cellular mechanism
remains poorly understood. Our prior investigation of the phenomenon in
rat somatosensory cortex indicated that fast oscillations result from
repetitive synaptic activation of cortical pyramidal cells originating
from GABAergic interneurons (Jones et al. 2000
). To test
this hypothesis, the effects of topical application of the
-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) antagonist
bicuculline methiodide (BMI) on fast oscillations were examined. At
subconvulsive concentrations (~10 µM), BMI application resulted in
a pronounced enhancement of fast activity, in some trials doubling the
number of oscillatory cycles evoked by whisker stimulation. The
amplitude and frequency of fast activity were not affected by BMI in a
statistically significant fashion. At higher concentrations, BMI
application resulted in the emergence of recurring spontaneous
slow-wave discharges resembling interictal spikes (IIS) and the
eventual onset of seizure. High-pass filtering of the IIS revealed that
a burst of fast oscillations accompanied the spontaneous discharge.
This activity was present in both the pre- and the postictal regimes,
in which its morphology and spatial distribution were largely
indistinguishable. These data indicate that fast cortical oscillations
do not reflect GABAergic postsynaptic currents. An alternate account
consistent with results observed to date is that this activity may
instead arise from population spiking in pyramidal cells, possibly
mediated by electrotonic coupling in a manner analogous to that
underlying 200-Hz ripple in the hippocampus. Additionally, fast
oscillations occur within spontaneous epileptiform discharges. However,
at least under the present experimental conditions, they do not appear
to be a reliable predictor of seizure onset nor an indicator of the
seizure focus.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cortical response
to an elementary sensory stimulus consists of a series of stereotyped
cellular events which give rise to the familiar evoked potential (EP)
complex recordable both intra- and extracranially. Although the
large-amplitude components of the evoked potential are relatively slow,
with dominant frequency of ~40 Hz, the EP also contains
high-frequency activity. This is apparent as a series of
small-amplitude deflections superimposed on the slow-wave EP components
which, following high-pass filtering, are seen to result from a burst
of fast oscillations, exhibiting a center frequency in excess of
several hundred hertz (Curio et al. 1994a
; Jones
and Barth 1999b
; Kandel and Buzsaki 1997
).
Fast oscillatory activity has been attracting increasing interest
concerning its potential role in normal and pathological brain function
(Curio 2000
; Traub et al. 2001
).
Somatosensory-evoked fast oscillations have been noninvasively
investigated in humans with electroencephalographic (Cracco and
Cracco 1976
; Eisen et al. 1984
; Maccabee
et al. 1983
; Yamada et al. 1984
) and
magnetoencephalographic (Curio et al. 1994a
,b
;
Gobbelé et al. 1998
; Hashimoto et al. 1996
) recording, demonstrating that, similar to the slow-wave components of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), they are of
cortical origin, exhibiting a somatotopic organization in the postcentral gyrus (Curio et al. 1997
; Hashimoto
et al. 1996
). However, slow and fast components of the human
SEP are differentially affected by sleep (Yamada et al.
1988
) and stimulus parameters (Klostermann et al.
1999
), suggesting that disparate cellular generators are
responsible for these phenomena.
Our laboratory has investigated fast oscillations invasively in rat
somatosensory cortex to identify its underlying cellular mechanism.
This work has confirmed the cortical origin of fast oscillations, which
exhibit a dipolar pattern in the lamina and propagate intracortically
(Jones and Barth 1999b
). Intracellular investigation
showed that whisker-evoked burst firing in fast spiking (FS) cells is
closely associated with fast oscillations present in the surface record
(Jones et al. 2000
). As FS cells correspond
morphologically to smooth or sparsely spiny GABAergic interneurons
(Kawaguchi 1993
; McCormick et al. 1985
),
these results suggest that inhibitory interneurons may act as pacemaker
of fast oscillations. Such a generator has been proposed for 600-Hz
"sigma-bursts" observed in the human magnetoencephalogram
(MEG) (Hashimoto et al. 1996
), and analogous
inhibitory neural circuitry is known to participate in 200-Hz
"ripples" in the hippocampus (Buzsaki et al. 1992
;
Ylinen et al. 1995
).
Conversely, a second finding of intracellular investigation was that
the evoked suprathreshold response in many regular spiking units
(presumably pyramidal cells) exhibits a periodicity similar to that of
the simultaneously recorded fast oscillations (Jones et al.
2000
), a feature also noted in extracellular recording of
multi-unit activity (Kandel and Buzsaki 1997
). Thus fast
oscillations may arise from excitatory interactions within the cortical
network, with pyramidal cells serving as both pre- and postsynaptic
participants. This is supported at least indirectly by recent
investigations in the hippocampus, indicating that high-frequency
oscillations (>200 Hz) termed "fast ripples" are produced by
pathological increases in excitability within the developing epileptic
focus (Bragin et al. 2000
).
The purpose of the present study was to clarify the possible synaptic
contributions to fast oscillations in rat somatosensory cortex. To this
end, epicortical application of the
-aminobutyric acid-A
(GABAA) receptor antagonist bicuculline
methiodide (BMI) was used to effect gross blockade of fast inhibition
in the cortical network. Low concentrations of BMI may be applied in
this fashion without inducing seizure, which permits the effects of
GABAA antagonism on stimulus-evoked fast
oscillations to be explored. Should fast oscillations directly reflect
GABAergic postsynaptic currents driven by inhibitory interneurons, BMI
should attenuate or eliminate this activity. At higher concentrations,
topical application of BMI typically leads to ictus. Such a preparation
provides the opportunity to study possible associations between fast
oscillations and seizure onset in a simple model of neocortical epileptogenesis.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgery
All procedures were performed in accordance with University of Colorado Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines for the humane use of laboratory animals in biological research. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (325-375 g) were anesthetized to surgical levels using intramuscular injections of ketamine HCl (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (25 mg/kg) and placed on a regulated heating pad. Anesthesia was subsequently maintained via continuous intramuscular infusion of a 50/50 ketamine/xylazine mixture (approximately 0.1 ml/h). A unilateral craniotomy was performed over the right hemisphere extending from bregma to lambda and from the midsagittal sinus lateral to the temporal bone, exposing a wide region of parietotemporal cortex where the dura was reflected. The contralateral facial nerves were sectioned to prevent spontaneous movement of the vibrissae during recording. Animals were killed by anesthesia overdose without regaining consciousness at the conclusion of the experiment.
Stimulation
The first three vibrissae of the B, C, and D rows of the left mystacial pad were clipped to a length of 2 cm, tied together, and displaced simultaneously at a distance ~1 cm from their base. Vibrissae stimulation was delivered using a piezoelectric translator (Märzhäuser PM-10) with motor compensation disabled, which delivered a rapid displacement of the vibrissae in an approximately dorsal-ventral direction (~5 µm at 5 mm/s) with negligible after-oscillations. This produced an evoked response that was well-defined for the purpose of targeting the laminar electrode, yet remained sufficiently small in amplitude as not to saturate the headstage preamplifiers of the laminar array when enhanced by application of bicuculline. In some instances, stimulation magnitude and/or velocity were subsequently increased slightly to improve the reliability of the laminar response. Stimulator performance was verified using a laboratory-built calibration device consisting of an infrared emitter-detector photodiode pair arranged to covert movement of the actuator arm into changes in photocurrent displayed on an oscilloscope. As shown in Fig. 1B, the apparatus applies rapid vibrissae displacement followed by a slower return to the baseline position over a few tens of milliseconds, with an absence of after-oscillations or "ringing" that could create oscillatory artifacts in the response.
|
Surface and laminar recording
Epipial maps of the vibrissa-evoked SEP complex were recorded
using a flat multi-channel electrode array consisting of 64 silver
wires arranged in a 8 × 8 grid (tip diameter: ~100 µm; inter-electrode spacing: 500 µm) covering a 3.5 × 3.5 mm area of the cortical surface in a single placement (see Fig. 1A).
Laminar recording was performed using a linear array of 16 platinum
electrodes [array diameter ~0.5 mm; electrode spacing: 125 µm
(15 × 125 µm = 1875 µm total array length) EEG KFT,
Budapest] inserted perpendicular to the cortical surface after removal
of the surface array at the approximate focus of the averaged surface
response. The laminar array was advanced until the top electrode was
barely visible at the cortical surface and left in place 20 min before
data collection was begun. Laminar and epipial potentials were
referenced to a silver ball electrode secured over the contralateral
frontal bone. Surface potentials were amplified (×500), analog
filtered (band-pass cutoff =
6 dB at 1-3000 Hz, roll-off = 5 dB/octave), and digitized at 10 kHz. Laminar potentials were
preamplified using a ×10 headstage and subsequently amplified (×200),
analog filtered, and digitized in the same fashion as surface potentials.
Drug application
Squares of filter paper (~5 × 5 mm) were saturated with BMI (Sigma/RBI; ~10 µM), mixed in 0.9% NaCl, applied to the surface of the cortex surrounding the laminar electrode array, and left in place throughout subsequent data collection. The saline vehicle was a physiological solution that is routinely used to moisten the cortex over the course of all of our experiments. For this reason, results of application of vehicle alone (control) are not presented. No change in the pH of this solution was detected following addition of BMI.
Data collection and analysis
Two hundred millisecond samples of the whisker-evoked response were recorded, with data from individual trials stored digitally for subsequent analysis. Fifty trials were collected prior to BMI application, 2 min after BMI application, and 30 min after wash. Trials that contained spontaneous discharges or excessive baseline activity or in which the animal was unresponsive were discarded.
The effects of BMI on the peak-to-peak amplitude, center frequency, and duration of evoked fast activity were quantified. Peak-to-peak amplitude of a given trial was defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum values of the high-pass filtered signal, computed for each channel and then averaged across all 16 channels of the laminar array. Center frequency was defined as the largest spectral peak above 200 Hz appearing in a 512-point fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the wide-band data centered on the P1 peak. Response duration was defined as the total time during which the rectified and smoothed high-frequency signal exceeded two times the SD of the prestimulus baseline (even if intervening portions of the response fell below this threshold) and was averaged across all channels. A number of alternate duration measures were examined, including surface-channel-only, maximum duration across all channels, and power-based measures defined using sliding FFT windows of various lengths, all of which gave qualitatively similar results. Data were pooled across animals and analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
It should be noted that current source density analysis (CSD) was not performed in the present study. We have found that the laminar profile of fast oscillations exhibits a substantial amount of trial-to-trial variability, such that legitimate CSD analysis of this activity requires nontrivial extensions to the method. These issues distract from and are not critical to the salient points of the study, and as such, these CSD results are not included in the present report.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulse displacement of the vibrissae elicited a surface response with a single-amplitude focus presumably centered at the cortical representation of the stimulated vibrissae (Fig. 1C). The morphology of the evoked response was consistent with the stereotypical SEP biphasic waveform, with a surface-positive peak (P1) emerging ~20-ms poststimulus, followed closely by a prominent surface-negative peak (N1). In addition to these slow-wave components, the surface response also displayed evidence of high-frequency activity. Power spectral density of averaged SEP data exhibited a prominent peak between 200 and 500 Hz (Fig. 1C; far right). Band-pass filtering of the SEP within these frequencies extracted a burst of high-frequency oscillations from the SEP complex, ~25-50 µV in amplitude and with a center frequency of ~450 Hz.
Wide-band laminar potentials recorded from the amplitude focus of the
surface response exhibited a distribution and morphology consistent
with previous laminar studies of both the slow-wave and the fast
oscillatory response in sensory cortex (Jones and Barth
1999b
). The biphasic morphology of the surface-evoked potential was distinguishable in the top channel of the laminar array (Fig. 2B), reversing polarity at
electrodes located in deep cortical lamina. High-frequency activity was
apparent in most lamina as a series of small ripples superimposed on
the underlying slow-wave components. Such ripples were also observed in
the surface response; however, they are less apparent in averaged data
such as that shown in Fig. 1C than in the individual trial
data depicted in Fig. 2B. Fast activity extracted from the
laminar wide-band data by band-pass filtering exhibited a dipolar
profile (Fig. 2C), with complementary peaks of opposite
polarity present for all major cycles in an oscillatory burst. The
reversal point of this activity was in the middle cortical lamina and
to first approximation appeared to be identical for all peaks.
|
Epicortical application of BMI had a rapid and dramatic effect on fast activity. The predominant change was an increase in the number of oscillatory cycles evoked by whisker stimulation, from the five to seven cycles typically observed under baseline conditions to as many as ~15 cycles within 2 min of BMI application. This was accompanied by changes in slow-wave components as well, including an increase in the overall amplitude of the SEP complex and a broadening of the P1 and N1 peaks (Fig. 3, inset). These effects were reversible, with both fast and slow activity returning to baseline 30 min following wash (Fig. 3, "wash"). Other features of fast activity did not appear to be affected by BMI. Notably, there was little change in amplitude or frequency, nor any apparent reorganization of its laminar distribution, although the latter was hard to quantify given the inherit variability of the spatiotemporal distribution of fast activity.
|
Statistical analysis confirmed the observations noted above. The duration of fast activity increased from a mean value of 43 ms in the baseline to 52 ms following application of BMI (P < 0.001; Fig. 4, left). No significant change was observed in amplitude (Fig. 4, center) or frequency (Fig. 4, right).
|
Higher concentrations of bicuculline used during surface mapping resulted in the appearance of spontaneous interictal spikes (IIS) within the first 1.0- to 6.0-min sampling epoch (Fig. 5C). Spontaneous IIS were similar to stimulus-evoked IIS and were characterized by an initial positive/negative slow-wave of approximately 50-ms duration (Fig. 5B, top trace) at the cortical surface. Digital high-pass filtering (200-500 Hz) of the IIS complex revealed a burst of fast oscillations coincident with the initial positive slow-wave (Fig. 5B, bottom trace) that typically continued at lower amplitude for several hundred milliseconds [325 ± 58 (SE) ms; n = 36]. Averaged IIS revealed a highly repeatable spatiotemporal pattern within a given animal, but one that differed between animals, probably due to differences in the concentration and spread of bicuculline. The initial slow positive wave of the IIS was earliest in the most caudal electrodes of the array and spread to the more rostral electrodes over a time period of 28 ms (Fig. 5D, left inset) or at a rate of ~125 µm/ms. The average rectified fast activity (Fig. 5C, right traces) closely followed the latency and spatial distribution of the slow-wave IIS complex and appeared to track the epileptiform discharge as it propagated through the cortex (Fig. 5D, right inset). Latency shifts of the positive amplitude peak of the IIS and rectified fast activity were positively correlated across electrodes in this epoch (r = 0.85; n = 63, P < 0.01), across all epochs in this animal (r = 0.59; n = 945, P < 0.01), and across animals (r = 0.6140; n = 2457, P < 0.01). A seizure occurred during 7.0- to 11.0-min postbicuculline and precluded averaging the IIS. In the epoch immediately following this (Fig. 5D), the spatiotemporal pattern of both the IIS and the fast oscillations was little changed. The amplitudes of both slow and fast activity appeared slightly larger postictally, but this increase was insignificant compared with the amplitude variability throughout the 1-h recording session. However, changes in the amplitude of the IIS and fast oscillations across all 5-min epochs in this animal were highly correlated (r = 0.75; n = 15, P < 0.01) as they were across animals (r = 0.68; n = 39, P < 0.01). Recordings during seizures were not analyzed because of the possibility of movement artifact in these unparalyzed animals. However, in none of the five seizures recorded was there evidence for a change in fast oscillatory activity independent of the slow-waves of the IIS complex just preceding seizure onset (Fig. 5E).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two principal results emerge from these data. 1) Epicortical application of BMI enhances stimulus-evoked high-frequency oscillations, causing a pronounced increase in the number of oscillatory cycles evoked by whisker stimulation. The amplitude and frequency of this activity was not affected by BMI in a statistically significant fashion. 2) High-frequency oscillations occur within spontaneous epileptiform discharges induced by BMI. Such spontaneous bursts were observed when using BMI at concentrations sufficient to lead to seizure. However, at least under the present experimental conditions, fast oscillations do not appear to be a reliable indicator of the interictal-to-ictal transition. The implication of these results will be discussed in terms of the cellular generator of this activity and the possible role high-frequency oscillations may play in epileptiform discharge.
The fast oscillations reported in the present study are the dominant
high-frequency activity occurring in rat somatosensory cortex and have
been observed under differing stimulation, recording, and anesthesia
conditions (Jones and Barth 1999b
; Jones et al. 2000
). However, these oscillations vary in frequency by ~25%
across studies, suggesting that frequency is not a reliable defining feature. Additionally, fast oscillations may be a heterogeneous phenomenon. Two co-occurring fast oscillatory phenomenon, segregated into frequency bands of 200-400 and 400-600 Hz, have been observed (Jones et al. 2000
), with activity in the lower band
occurring at the earliest poststimulus latencies. However, this
component was not evident in an earlier study (Jones and Barth
1999b
) nor in the present data. Association of the slower
component with the P1 peak suggests that it may partially reflect the
sequential laminar activation pattern that dominates the
cortical-evoked response (Barth and Di 1990
).
Additionally, this component may reflect a synchronized thalamocortical
volley, analogous to that recently demonstrated in the piglet
(Ikeda et al. 2002
). While the lability of the slower
component makes its neural mechanism difficult to establish, the fast
oscillations reported here are robust and have been consistently
observed under a variety of experimental conditions.
Replicating results of our previous studies (Jones and Barth
1999a
; Jones et al. 2000
), the laminar profile
of fast oscillations exhibits a dipolar configuration. As shown in Fig.
2C, each of the major surface peaks of a given oscillatory
burst are aligned with a peak of opposite polarity occurring in deep
lamina. This dipolar pattern indicates that the cellular currents
underlying fast oscillations are largely constrained in the vertical
direction. Such currents will arise as a result of synchronized
activity in cellular elements which similarly exhibit a prominent
vertical orientation, appearing as the extracellular passive return
currents that are established to satisfy current continuity
requirements (Hubbard et al. 1969
; Johnston and
Wu 1997
). The neuronal element that is immediately suggested by
these considerations is the cortical pyramidal cell, with its long
vertically oriented apical dendrite providing an optimal cellular
substrate for generating elongated large-amplitude dipolar field potentials.
Previous intracellular recordings demonstrate that whisker-evoked burst
firing in fast spiking units (presumably inhibitory interneurons) is
closely associated with simultaneously recorded fast oscillatory
activity (Jones et al. 2000
). This, in addition to their
dipolar laminar profile, suggests that fast oscillations may reflect a
population inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) arising in field
potentials as FS spike bursts impinge on their pyramidal cell targets.
However, the present results clearly do not support this model.
Although bicuculline is known to exert a number of nonsynaptic effects
(Heyer et al. 1982
; Olsen et al. 1976
),
the results of BMI application observed presently are wholly consistent
with its established action as a GABAA-receptor
antagonist. Topical application of BMI increased cortical excitability.
This is supported not only by the emergence of spontaneous discharges and, in some instances, seizure following drug application, but also by
changes induced in SEP morphology. BMI both increased the amplitude and
accelerated the onset of the SEP, as well as broadened both P1 and N1
peaks, events known to be associated with excitatory cortical processes
(Brailowsky and Knight 1984
; Zemon et al.
1980
). Yet, fast activity was prolonged but otherwise unaltered
by application of BMI. Amplitude remained unchanged (Fig. 4), which
would not be expected if the synaptic currents underlying the
phenomenon were blocked. There was no overt change in morphology or
frequency, as might be expected if the dynamics of this activity were
controlled by GABAA processes. Last, there was no
apparent reorganization of its laminar distribution that might suggest
a nonuniform perfusion of BMI that may have spared deep
GABAA currents. The spread of bicuculline or its
effective concentration at the receptor site is not known. However, the effects of BMI were qualitatively similar for all concentrations used
in the study. From brief application of subconvulsive doses to
prolonged exposure to sufficient quantities of BMI to induce seizure, a
singular salient result is observed: fast oscillations cannot be
extinguished by application of bicuculline. This result strongly
suggests that fast oscillations do not reflect population IPSPs.
A possible alternative account of fast oscillations is that they may
reflect population excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs). There is
substantial recurrent excitation within the cortical network, with a
large fraction of asymmetric synapses found on a given pyramidal cell
originating from other pyramidal cells (Braitenberg and
Schüz 1998
; White 1989
). Our intracellular investigations have uncovered a subset of regular spiking units (presumably pyramidal cells) that exhibit suprathreshold responses at
preferred latencies defined by successive cycles of fast oscillatory activity (Jones et al. 2000
). Thus pyramidal cells may
serve as both pre- and postsynaptic elements in the fast oscillatory
response, with synchronized population firing imposing potent
postsynaptic currents that regenerate the next cycle of fast activity
and ramify in field potentials as one peak of the fast oscillatory
burst. Yet, several considerations cast doubt on the efficacy of
recurrent EPSPs to synchronize activity at the millisecond time scales
required to generate coherent fast oscillatory field potentials. These include the time course of EPSPs, the nonproximal termination of
recurrent collaterals, and a substantial incidence of synaptic transmission failure (see e.g., Miles and Wong 1986
and
references therein). Additionally, computational studies of 200-Hz
oscillations in the hippocampus indicate that high-frequency
synchronization cannot be achieved via chemical synapses (Traub
et al. 1999
).
These arguments suggest a third possibility, that fast oscillations may
reflect population spikes in cortical pyramidal cells. This hypothesis
is consistent with our intracellular results, which noted that
whisker-evoked spiking in a subset of RS units occurs at preferred
latencies defined by the fast oscillatory burst (Jones et al.
2000
). Extracellular currents associated with pyramidal cell
action potentials are expected to give rise to vertically oriented
field potential dipoles (Rall 1962
). When synchronized
across a sufficiently large cell population, such activity could
contribute coherent small-amplitude oscillations against a background
of larger slow-wave SEP components, the latter likely reflecting
excitatory chemical synaptic interactions (Barth and Di
1990
). Such a combination of slow-wave and fast oscillatory activity has been observed in the hippocampus, in which 200-Hz ripples
are superimposed on field potential sharp waves (Buzsaki et al.
1992
; Ylinen et al. 1995
). The study of the
electrogenesis of 200-Hz activity has benefited from its persistence in
the hippocampal slice (Draguhn et al. 1998
) and is
thought to emerge from repetitive population spikes in a network of
electrotonically coupled pyramidal cells, likely via axonal gap
junctions (Schmitz et al. 2001
; Traub et al.
1994
). These oscillations are not dependent on chemical synaptic transmission and are abolished by gap junction blockers such
as halothane, an effect that is also observed in the intact animal
(Ylinen et al. 1995
).
Fast oscillations reported here may therefore reflect a phenomenon
analogous to hippocampal ripple, operating in cortex. The preferred
spiking latencies exhibited by cortical RS units are similarly observed
in hippocampal pyramidal cells, which tend to fire action potentials
only on one or some cycles of a given oscillatory burst, if they fire
at all (Buzsaki et al. 1992
). Additionally, there is
evidence that cortical pyramidal cells may be coupled by gap junctions
(Gutnick and Prince 1981
). Last, computational models of
ripple reproduce the correlated spike bursting in inhibitory
interneurons we observe as a consequence of phasic drive from the
pyramidal cell network (Traub and Bibbig 2000
;
Traub et al. 2001
; see also Lewis and Rinzel
2000
). This model is thus consistent with our previous
intracellular results and the present observation that BMI fails to
extinguish fast cortical oscillations. There may be contributions from
both population IPSPs and population spikes in the hippocampus or in
the undrugged cortex, but synchronized population spiking appears to be
the dominant contributor in cortex under the present experimental conditions.
The analogy between fast oscillations in cortex and hippocampus may
also be extended to their putative role in epileptogenesis. Fast
ripples are associated with epileptiform discharge in both in vitro
(Schwartzkroin and Prince 1977
, 1978
; Traub et
al. 2001
; Wong and Traub 1983
) and in vivo
models of hippocampal seizures (Bragin et al. 1999b
,c
,
2000
), and with human temporal lobe epilepsy (Bragin et
al. 1999a
,b
), possibly reflecting synchronized population spikes as noted by Dudek and co-workers (Buckmaster and Dudek 1997
, 1999
; Hellier et al. 1999
; Patrylo
et al. 1999
). Fast oscillations or ripples in both cortex and
hippocampus are above 200 Hz and superimposed on the rising limb of the
depolarizing slow wave of the IIS. Both are associated with spontaneous
IIS as well as stimulus-triggered IIS. Finally, both oscillatory
phenomena are linked to decreased inhibition, suggesting excitatory
interactions between principal neurons.
Yet, there are differences between cortical fast oscillations and
hippocampal fast ripples that make their direct comparison problematic.
While fast ripples are usually superimposed on the IIS, they may also
be spatially and temporally dissociated (Bragin et al.
1999b
). IIS recorded outside the epileptogenic lesion in the
rat kainate model have no accompanying fast ripples, and fast ripples
may be recorded in the vicinity of the lesion with no clear IIS
slow-wave. In contrast, both stimulus-triggered and spontaneous fast
oscillations recorded in somatosensory cortex are closely associated
with the IIS slow-wave and do not occur independently. Fast
oscillations and IIS display a similar spatial distribution and
propagate in tandem through the cortex. However, the full extent of the
epileptic focus was not mapped in the present study, so potential
differences in the spatial distributions of fast oscillations and the
IIS may have gone undetected. Finally, while cortical fast oscillations
during IIS appear as a simple prolongation of the normal response to
sensory stimulation, fast ripples are distinctly associated with an
epileptic lesion and cannot be recorded in normal hippocampus.
While cortical fast oscillations may not be directly comparable to the
hippocampal fast ripples of temporal lobe epilepsy, the association
between normal sensory-evoked fast oscillations and those occurring
during IIS suggests a unique role these phenomena could play in
cortical epileptogenesis. We have proposed that fast oscillations
facilitate precise intra- and inter-columnar synchronization during
multi-vibrissa-evoked responses (Jones and Barth 1999a
),
a phenomenon that may underlie somatosensory pattern detection or
texture discrimination in the rat. Thus cellular circuitry responsible
for synchronization required of normal sensory processing may be
exploited in pathological states of decreased inhibition to trigger
epileptiform discharge in abnormal cortex and/or to propagate these
discharges in normal cortex surrounding the epileptic focus. In the
human cortex, fast oscillations have been shown to characterize both
the sensory evoked response (Curio et al. 1994a
,b
, 1997
;
Gobbelé et al. 1998
; Green et al.
1986
; Hashimoto et al. 1996
; Maccabee et
al. 1983
; Yamada et al. 1984
, 1988
) and the
abnormal activity preceding seizure onset (Traub et al.
2001
). Thus continued study of the phenomenon may not only contribute to an understanding of seizure initiation and propagation, but also help elucidate fundamental mechanisms of information processing in the human neocortex.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant 2 R01 NS-36981 to D. S. Barth.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: D. S. Barth, Dept. of Psychology, University of Colorado, Campus Box 345, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0345 (E-mail: dbarth{at}psych.colorado.edu).
Received 1 February 2002; accepted in final form 25 April 2002.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-bursts") to cellular substrates.
J Clin Neurophysiol
17:
377-396, 2000[ISI][Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-H. Tseng, L.-Y. Tsai, and S.-R. Yeh Induction of High-Frequency Oscillations in a Junction-Coupled Network J. Neurosci., July 9, 2008; 28(28): 7165 - 7173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Steinschneider, Y. I. Fishman, and J. C. Arezzo Spectrotemporal Analysis of Evoked and Induced Electroencephalographic Responses in Primary Auditory Cortex (A1) of the Awake Monkey Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 610 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Rojas, J. A. Navas, and D. M. Rector Evoked response potential markers for anesthetic and behavioral states Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): R189 - R196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Edwards, M. Soltani, L. Y. Deouell, M. S. Berger, and R. T. Knight High Gamma Activity in Response to Deviant Auditory Stimuli Recorded Directly From Human Cortex J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4269 - 4280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Traub, D. Contreras, M. O. Cunningham, H. Murray, F. E. N. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. B. Wilent, M. J. Higley, and M. A. Whittington Single-Column Thalamocortical Network Model Exhibiting Gamma Oscillations, Sleep Spindles, and Epileptogenic Bursts J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2194 - 2232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hanajima, R. Chen, P. Ashby, A. M. Lozano, W. D. Hutchison, K. D. Davis, and J. O. Dostrovsky Very Fast Oscillations Evoked by Median Nerve Stimulation in the Human Thalamus and Subthalamic Nucleus J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2004; 92(6): 3171 - 3182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J Staba, P. C Bergmann, and D. S Barth Dissociation of slow waves and fast oscillations above 200 Hz during GABA application in rat somatosensory cortex J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 205 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Brunel and X.-J. Wang What Determines the Frequency of Fast Network Oscillations With Irregular Neural Discharges? I. Synaptic Dynamics and Excitation-Inhibition Balance J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 415 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Staba, B. Brett-Green, M. Paulsen, and D. S. Barth Effects of Ventrobasal Lesion and Cortical Cooling on Fast Oscillations (>200 Hz) in Rat Somatosensory Cortex J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2380 - 2388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Barth Submillisecond Synchronization of Fast Electrical Oscillations in Neocortex J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2502 - 2510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Buhl, K. D. Harris, S. G. |