|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (January 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00600.2002
Submitted on Submitted 24 July 2002; accepted in final form 24 September 2002
1Department of Physics and 2Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Berg, Rune W. and David Kleinfeld. Rhythmic Whisking by Rat: Retraction as Well as Protraction of the Vibrissae Is Under Active Muscular Control. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 104-117, 2003. The rhythmic motor activity of the vibrissae that rodents use for the tactile localization of objects provides a model system for understanding patterned motor activity in mammals. The muscles that drive this whisking are only partially fixed relative to bony attachments and thus shift their position along with the movement. As a means to characterize the pattern of muscular dynamics during different patterns of whisking, we recorded electromyogram (EMG) activity from the muscles that propel individual follicles, as well as EMG activity from a muscle group that moves the mystacial pad. The dominant pattern of whisking in our behavioral paradigm, referred to as exploratory whisking, consisted of large amplitude sweeps in the frequency range of 5-15 Hz. The frequency remained remarkably constant within a bout of whisking but changed values between bouts. The extrinsic musculature, which shifts the surface of the pad backwards, was found to be activated in approximate antiphase to that of the intrinsic muscles, which rotate individual vibrissae forward. Thus retraction of the vibrissae was driven by a backward shift in the attachment point of the follicles to the mystacial pad. In a less frequent pattern of whisking, referred to as foveal whisking, the vibrissae are thrust forward and palpate objects with low-amplitude movements that are in the higher frequency range of 15-25 Hz. Protraction of the vibrissae remains driven by the intrinsic muscles, while retraction in this pattern is largely passive. Interestingly, a mechanical argument suggests that activation of the extrinsic muscles during foveal whisking is not expected to affect the angle of the vibrissae. As a means to establish if the phasic control of the intrinsic versus extrinsic muscles depended on sensory feedback, we characterized whisking before and after bilateral transections of the infraorbital branch of the trigeminal sensory nerve. The loss of sensory feedback had no net effect on the antiphase relation between activation of the intrinsic versus extrinsic muscles over the full frequency range for exploratory whisking. These data point to the existence of a dual-phase central pattern generator that drives the vibrissae.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most processes of sensation
involve the active repositioning of the underlying sensors. Therefore
an understanding of sensation involves the need to decode the motor
control of the sensory organs as well as the sensory input per se. At
the level of vision, animals utilize smooth tracking movements as well
as small saccadic movements to maintain the image of the selected
object on the fovea (Rashbass 1961
). Olfaction provides
a second example of the motor control of a sensory process. Crustasea
are observed to direct and flick their antennae as a means to detect
and pursue the spatial distribution of attractants (Koehl et al.
2001
), while mammals orient and increase their rate of sniffing
in the presence of appetitive odorants (Freeman and Baird
1987
). Somatosensation, for which sensory input is directly
linked to the relative motion between the sensor and the object,
provides evidence for the motor control of sensors as the substrate for
texture analysis (Ahissar 1998
; Darian-Smith 1984
). The vibrissa system of rodents is unique among
somatosensory systems in that muscular control has extensive bilateral
mechanical symmetry (Brecht et al. 1997
; Carvell
and Simons 1990
; Guic-Robles et al., 1989
;
Vincent 1912
; Welker 1964
; Wineski
1983
), few degrees of freedom (Fee et al. 1997
;
Sachdev et al. 2002
), and operates without spindle
fibers to provide feedback on muscular contraction (Rice et al.
1994
).
Here we address the muscular control of the macrovibrissae during
rhythmic whisking by rat. These vibrissae are long, tactile hairs that
originate from follicles that are arranged as an ordered array within a
specialized facial structure, the mystacial pad (Dorfl
1982
) (Fig. 1A). The
rat uses its vibrissae to acquire tactile sensory information by
sweeping them in a coordinated, rhythmic fashion (Brecht et al.
1997
; Carvell and Simons 1990
, 1995
; Fee
et al. 1997
; Guic-Robles et al. 1989
;
Sachdev et al. 2002
; Simons and Carvell
1996
; Vincent 1912
; Welker 1964
;
Wineski 1983
). Whisking is behaviorally rich in that the
animal can alter the amplitude and frequency between bouts
(Nicolelis et al. 1995
; O'Connor et al.
2002
; Simons and Carvell 1996
). Movement of the follicle is controlled by the facial motor nerve ("mn" in Fig. 1A), which innervates two classes of muscles. One class, the
intrinsic muscles ("i" in Fig. 1B) (Dorfl
1982
; Wineski 1985
), have their points of
attachment completely within the mystacial pad and form a sling around
each follicle ("i" in Fig. 1B). Contraction of the
intrinsic muscles has been shown to correlate with protraction of the
vibrissae in a manner consistent with the force diagram of Fig.
1D (Carvell et al. 1991
). A second class of
muscles, the extrinsic muscles, forms bridges from the surface of the
pad ("eu " in Fig. 1B) to anchors
that lie external to the mystacial pad ("eu " and "el " in Fig. 1C). Contraction
of the extrinsic muscles should shift the position of orifice of the
follicle relative to the underlying plate and thus provide a force that
shifts the pivot points of the vibrissae (Fig. 1D). This
leads to the hypothesis that activation of the extrinsic muscles can
drive retraction of the vibrissae (Wineski 1985
). This
hypothesis is supported by the observation that microstimulation of
vibrissa primary motor cortex in anesthetized animals leads mainly to
retraction of the vibrissae, as opposed to protraction (Gioanni
and Lamarche 1985
; Sanderson et al. 1984
). It
can be directly tested by simultaneously recording from both the
intrinsic and extrinsic muscles.
|
We asked the following questions: 1) Are the extrinsic muscles, as opposed to only the intrinsic muscle, directly involved in rhythmic whisking? In particular, we test the hypothesis that retraction of the vibrissae can be driven by the extrinsic muscles. 2) What is the spectral fidelity of rhythmic whisking? In particular, how does the variability of rhythmic whisking within a bout of whisking compare with the variability between different bouts of whisking? 3) What is the detailed role of sensory feedback in the control of rhythmic whisking? In particular, we quantify the spectral properties of rhythmic whisking, and the phased activation of different muscle groups, before and after transection of the sensory nerve.
Our experiments made use of a defined behavior task in which animals perch and whisk in air in search of a food tube. The electromyogram (EMG) of the intrinsic muscles and of the upper branch of the extrinsic muscles were concurrently measured. The relation between EMG activity and physical motion of the vibrissae was established with videography. As whisking is naturally a rhythmic process, we made extensive use of spectral techniques and associated statistical measures to characterize the muscular activation.
Preliminary aspects of this work have been presented (Berg and
Kleinfeld 2001
).
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our subjects were nine Long-Evans female rats, 200-300 g in
mass, that were trained to whisk in search of a food reward. The differential electromyogram (
EMG) of the intrinsic muscles and the
EMG of the upper branch of the extrinsic muscles was concurrently measured in eight of the nine animals. The
EMG was calculated as the
difference in the potential measured by electrodes places across the
muscle group. We further recorded the differential local field
potential (
LFP) from vibrissa primary sensory (S1) cortex in each of
these animals, as previously described (O'Connor et al.
2002
). After a set of
EMG and
LFP data were obtained, we
performed a bilateral transection of the infraorbital branch of the
trigeminal nerve (IoN) on five of the eight animals with EMG electrodes
in both the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles. Sham transection surgery
was performed on two of the remaining three animals as a control. This
progression is summarized as:
Training
EMG surgery
recording
bilateral IoN transection
recording
Last, the
EMG of the intrinsic muscles only was recorded in the
remaining original animal. The care and all aspects of experimental manipulation of our animals were in strict accord with guidelines from
the National Institute of Health (1985)
and have been
reviewed, approved, and observed by members of the local Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee.
Behavioral training
The rats were gentled and acclimatized to the experimental environment over a period of 1-2 wk prior to surgical implanting of the EMG and LFP electrodes. After a 10-day recovery from surgery, rats were deprived of solid food and trained to explore a figure eight maze as a means to gain access to liquid food [50% (wt/vol); LD-100; PMI Feeds; Fig. 2]. Small objects were occasionally introduced to the maze to encourage exploratory whisking. Food was presented on an episodic basis through two venues. The first food presentation venue was through a mechanized food tube, located below a video camera (see Videography), that can swing into place. The geometry of this set-up forced the animals to perch at a ledge and crane to gain access to the food tube (Fig. 2). The second venue was through a hand-held syringe that was placed at different locations. Each recording session lasted about 1 h, and a total of 10 ml of liquid food was typically imbibed in a session. Recording was repeated daily for 3-7 days.
|
The viability of our animals was assayed, in part, by the spectral
composition of the
LFP (O'Connor et al. 2002
). We
collected data only during intervals in which we observed a relatively
broad spectral response in cortex that was centered near 7 Hz. This response is consistent with the largely desynchronized electrical state
of cortex in an animal during exploratory behavior (O'Connor et
al. 2002
; Semba and Komisaruk 1984
). Additional
intervals, in which the rats were immobile and the vibrissae exhibited
low-amplitude tremors, were characterized by a spectral response that
was sharply peaked between 9 and 11 Hz. These intervals correspond to a
thalamocortical spindling (Buzsaki et al., 1988
;
Semba and Komisaruk 1984
) and were rejected for further analysis.
EMG
Microwire EMG electrodes fashioned from Teflon-coated Tungsten wire (50 µm; no. 7955, A-M Systems) were surgically implanted as a means to record extracellular muscle activity. All procedures were performed on animals that were anesthetized by a mixture of ketamine (0.05 mg/g rat mass, supplemented every 2 h at 0.01 mg/g rat mass) and xylazine (0.015 mg/g rat mass) that was delivered intraperitoneally.
Intrinsic muscles
Microwires were placed within the mystacial pad from underneath
the skin, as previously described (Carvell et al. 1991
;
Fee et al. 1997
), as a means to record the aggregate
activity of the intrinsic muscles (Fig. 1B). In brief, an
incision was made through the skin along the midline of the skull. A
25-gauge syringe needle was loaded with a set of four electrodes and
inserted below the incised skin and through the soft muscular tissue of
the mystacial pad. The needle exited through the rostral end of the
pad, the tips of the wires were stripped of insulation to form EMG
electrodes, and individual wires were pulled back so that the set of
wires were spaced uniformly along the pad (e.g., location * in Fig. 1B).
Extrinsic muscles
Microwires were placed in the fibers of the upper extrinsic
musculature, the M. levator labii superioris (Dorfl
1982
) and M. nasolabialis (Dorfl
1985
; Wineski 1985
), as a means to record the
aggregate activity of part of the musculature that moves the mystacial
pad (Fig. 1C). This group of muscles is accessed through the
incision along the midline of the skull. These muscle groups attach on
the frontal bone behind the nasofrontal suture, close to the incision.
They were identified during surgery by applying a small oscillatory
current with a bipolar electrode and by observing if the vibrissae
moved in backwards direction. Four fine wires were gently pressed into
the fibers on each side and sutured to the connective tissue with 4-0 nylon suture (e.g., location * in Fig. 1C). The electrical
reference for both the intrinsic and extrinsic extracellular signals
was placed in the dermis that lay dorsal to the nasal bone.
Verification of signals
After completion of all behavioral measurements, the position of both sets of EMG microwire electrodes was confirmed in selected animals. We passed trains of monophasic, bipolar current-pulses, 200 µs in duration repeated at an interval of 1 ms for a total of five pulses per train and 100-200 µA in amplitude through pairs of wires in each set. The concomitant movement of the vibrissae elicited by these pulses was measured in two ways. For all animals, we glued a small magnet, <1 mg in mass, to vibrissa C2, and recorded the direction and extent of deflection through a magnetoresistive detector (HMC1001; Honeywell, Minneapolis, MN; Fig. 3 A and B). In selected animals, the motion of the vibrissa was further confirmed with high-speed videography (Figs. 3, C-H).
|
Bilateral transection of the infraorbital nerve
In most subjects, the IoN was transected after a 3- to 7-day
period of data collection with the animals in the normal state. The
nerves were cut from inside the orbit to avoid interference with the
facial motor nerve (VII cranial nerve) and to avoid disturbing the EMG
electrodes. In brief, the eye was retracted in the caudal direction,
the tissue anterior to the eye was split, and the nerve was identified
along the dorsal ridge of the orbit. All branches of the IoN, reported
to number eight (Dorfl 1985
), were transected. After
recovery, the animal lacked the behavioral correlates of facial
sensation as visually assayed by the inability to cease whisking on
contact with an object, but was able to locate and imbibe water and
liquid food.
Data acquisition
All electrical signals were buffered near the head of the animal
with field effect transistors (NB Laboratories, Denville, TX). The
extracellular signals from the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles were
differentially amplified (×6,400) relative to the nasal reference and
digitized at 8 kHz with a 12-bit D/A converter (AT-MIO-16E-1, National
Instruments). The rectified, differential EMG was formed numerically
(Interactive Data Language; Research Systems). We first computed the
difference of two signals that spanned a muscle group to remove common
artifacts and form the
EMG, e.g., the voltage on the wire in the
posterior end of the mystacial pad was subtracted from the voltage on
the wire at the anterior end to form the intrinsic muscle signal. This
difference signal was high pass filtered at 50 Hz, the absolute value
was formed, and the now rectified signal was low-pass filtered at 80 Hz
and subsampled at 800 Hz.
Videography
The motion of the vibrissa was directly measured by a
high-speed videography (100-111 frames/s; model ES310 charge coupled device camera; Kodak) for selected trials. In these cases, the animals
whisked as they perched on the maze and stretched toward the food tube.
The vibrissae were illuminated under pseudo-darkfield conditions
(Fee et al. 1997
). Frame-by-frame reference signals from
the video electronics were used to synchronize video frames with the
digitized EMG signals. While the
EMG provided a signal that was
proportional to the depolarization of the underlying musculature,
videography allowed us to directly estimate the angular position of the
vibrissae over time.
Spectral analysis
Spectra power densities of individual time series of muscle or
brain activity, denoted S(f) below, and the SD of these measures, were
calculated with the direct multi-taper spectral estimation techniques
of Thomson (1982)
(see Cacciatore et al.
(1999)
for implementation). In brief, the spectral power is
defined in terms of an average over all instances and tapers
|
|
{

{w(k)(t)}

4 times the
initial length. The parameter N is the number of instances
of the waveform (1-103 in the present work),
K is the number of tapers or degrees of freedom in the
spectral estimate (1-5 in the present work), T is duration
of the data trace (1-4 s in the present case), and fN = (2tS)
1 is the
Nyquist frequency. In this procedure, the spectrum is averaged over a
half-bandwidth of (K + 1)/(2T).
A special aspect of this spectral estimation techniques is that it
minimizes the leakage between neighboring frequency bands. Additional
smoothing, but no change in bandwidth, is obtained by averaging the
spectra from multiple instances. SD of the power spectra are reported
as jackknife estimates across trials (Thomson and Chave
1991
). Last, the spectral coherence and the variance in the
coherence, used in this study to determine the phase lag between two
signals, was similarly calculated with the techniques of Thomson
(Thomson 1982
; Thomson and Chave 1991
).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A necessary condition for the active retraction of the vibrissae
is that electrical activation of the extrinsic muscles must cause a
deflection in the caudal direction. Conversely, stimulation of the
intrinsic muscles in the mystacial pad are expected to cause movement
in the rostral direction, consistent with protraction. We confirmed
these effects, first discussed by Wineski (1985)
, by
passing current pulses through the microwires to the respective muscle groups and observing the resultant motion (Fig. 3). Stimulation of the extrinsic muscles led to prompt, caudal deflections as seen
through the electrically measured deflection of a small magnet attached
to vibrissa C2 (Fig. 3, A and B) and through
videography (Fig. 3, C-E). Conversely, stimulation of the
intrinsic muscles led to prompt, rostral deflections (Fig. 3,
B and F-H). The difference in
direction of vibrissa movement seen for activation of the extrinsic versus intrinsic muscles was observed in each of our animals
(n = 9).
We now shift our focus to the whisking behavior of rats as they
explored the maze in search of a food tube or food laden syringe. Our
animals were observed to exhibit two patterns of rhythmic whisking. The
most prevalent pattern consisted of 1- to 10-s bouts of large amplitude
whisks, with a frequency in the range of 5-15 Hz. We refer to this
movement as "exploratory" whisking. The form of the motion is in
agreement with past reports (Carvell and Simons 1990
;
Fee et al. 1997
; O'Connor et al. 2002
;
Vincent 1912
; Welker 1964
). A second
pattern of whisking was observed when animals had to crane across a gap
to locate the food tube or other objects of interest. The animals
thrust their vibrissae forward and rhythmically palpated the object
with their vibrissae for periods of 0.5-1 s. We refer to this pattern
as "foveal" whisking since the vibrissae are clustered in front of
the head in a relatively dense pattern, similar to the clustering of
photoreceptors in the fovea of the retina. Compared with exploratory
whisking, the motions in foveal whisking were of higher frequency,
ranging from 15 to 25 Hz, and of smaller amplitude. The observation of
higher frequency whisking is also consistent with past observations
(Carvell and Simons 1990
, 1996
).
The presence of two patterns of whisking in our behavioral paradigm
allowed us to characterize muscular activation over a broad range of
values of angular set points. We first report the relation between the
angular motion of the vibrissae and the activation of intrinsic versus
extrinsic muscles. These data are based on the comparison of a sequence
of videograph images of the vibrissae with the rectified
EMG signals
(data from 4 animals). We then report the parameterization of the
muscular activation and whisking dynamics in terms of the distribution
of measured quantities across an extensive sample of whisking bouts and
animals (data from 9 animals).
Vibrissa motion during exploratory whisking
Successive video images of a representative bout of exploratory
whisking shows that the vibrissae are swept with large amplitude motions, at a rate of 9 Hz, that span from highly retracted to highly
protracted angles (Fig. 4,
A-O). Protraction of the vibrissae follows
activation of the intrinsic muscles, as inferred from the rectified
intrinsic
EMG, while retraction of the vibrissae follows activation
of the extrinsic muscles (Fig. 4P). The angle of the
vibrissae (defined in Fig.
5P), was estimated from each image (
in Fig. 4, A-O). The time delay between a change
in angular position and the intrinsic
EMG signal is 20 ms in this
example (Fig. 4P).
|
|
The antiphasic activation of extrinsic versus intrinsic muscles
is seen in further detail in a second example of exploratory whisking
(Fig. 4Q). The cross-correlation between the
EMG of the
two muscle groups indicates that the phase lag between extrinsic and
intrinsic muscle activity, denoted
, is
= 0.9 ·
radians (inset in Fig. 4Q; the lag is calculated
with respect to the intrinsic
EMG). In general, the antiphasic
activation of the two muscle groups (Fig. 4, P and
Q), together with the correspondence of retraction with the
activation of the extrinsic muscles (Fig. 4P), was observed
in all videographed sets of epochs (n = 20; 4 animals).
These results imply that retraction of the vibrissae during exploratory
behavior is an active process.
Vibrissa motion during foveal whisking
In contrast to the case for exploratory whisking, a
representative bout of foveal whisking shows that the vibrissae are
largely thrust forward. The rhythmic motion is superimposed on this
offset in angle (Fig. 5, A-O) and is smaller in
amplitude and much more rapid, 17 Hz in this example, than in the case
of exploratory whisking. The amplitude of the motion for the caudal
vibrissae (Fig. 5P), which showed the largest motion, was
estimated from each image (
in Fig. 5, A-O). We found
that the position is locked to the
EMG signal for the intrinsic
muscles; the extrinsic muscle is largely inactive (Fig. 5Q).
Thus protraction of the vibrissae follows activation of the intrinsic
muscles and retraction is provided by the vasoelastic properties of the
muscle and tissue. The time delay between the onset of the two signals
is 18 ms in this example, close to that for the case of foveal whisking.
The correspondence of retraction with the activation of the extrinsic muscles (Fig. 5Q) was observed in all videographed sets of epochs (n = 20; 4 animals). These results imply that retraction of the vibrissae during foveal whisking appears to be passive.
Transition between patterns
While exploratory whisking was the prevalent pattern observed in our behavioral paradigm, animals were observed to transition between the two modes as they craned to gain access to the food tube (Fig. 2). We consider a record with a progression from foveal to exploratory whisking (Fig. 6). During the foveal pattern, rhythmic activation of the intrinsic muscle but essentially no activation of the extrinsic muscles is present, as above (Fig. 5Q). The onset of exploratory whisking is accompanied by a decrease in whisking frequency from 22 to 9 Hz and by activation of both the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles in anti-phase, also as above (Fig. 4, P and Q).
|
Delay between the intrinsic
EMG and protraction
The
EMG is proportional to the force produced by the
musculature. For small angular displacements, the
EMG is further
proportional to the torque applied to the vibrissae. We note from
physical mechanics that dissipation by the viscoelastic properties of
the mystacial pad will lead to a temporal lag between the displacement of the vibrissae and the intrinsic
EMG, as is evident in the examples of Figs. 4P and 5Q (see also Fig.
2B in Carvell et al. 1991
). We measured this
lag, denoted
lag, over a 6- to 25-Hz range of
whisking frequencies (n = 68 cycles; 3 animals) and
found that it was essentially independent of whisking frequency, with
|
Phase between intrinsic and extrinsic muscle activity
Our observations on bouts of exploratory whisking showed that there was a phase lag between activation of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles (Figs. 6 and 4, P and Q). A central question in the interpretation of this result is whether the phase lag is independent of frequency, which implies that the trajectory of vibrissae motion during exploratory whisking is independent of frequency, or whether the lag varies with frequency, which is suggestive of a time delay between the activation of the two muscle groups.
The result for a representative animal shows that the phase-lag remains
fixed as the frequency of whisking changes from bout to bout (cf. Fig.
7, A and B). To
quantify the relative muscular activation during whisking, we
calculated the phase lags between the intrinsic and extrinsic
EMG
across all whisking frequencies (Fig. 7C). The result for
this animal (n = 603, 1-s bouts) shows that the phase
is constant over a 6- to 12-Hz range of exploratory whisking for this
animal (dark gray line in Fig. 7C); this range encompassed
90% of all whisking bouts. The average phase lag, found by integrating
over the 6- to 12-Hz range of frequencies to form the PDF of the phase
lag, has a value of nearly
radians (Fig.
7D); the small fraction of phase lags for
f0 > 12 Hz had high variability and
were not considered in the average. By means of comparison, the time
delay that fits the phase lag at a whisking frequency of
f0 = 10 Hz, i.e.,
=
/2
f0 = 350 ms, leads to an
unrealistic frequency dependence for the phase lag (light gray line in
Fig. 7C). More generally, detailed measurements of the phase
shift as a function of frequency across all animals (n = 8) are consistent with a constant lag, with a population average of
= (0.83 ± 0.08) ·
radians (Fig.
8).
|
|
Previous work showed that animals can whisk after transection of the
infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (IoN) (Franchi 2001
; Gao et al. 2001
; Welker
1964
). We take advantage of this finding to ask if the phase
lag between the intrinsic and extrinsic muscle groups can be controlled
by sensory feedback, even if past results imply that activation of at
least the intrinsic muscles is independent of sensory feedback. Thus we
repeated the measurements on the spectral phase lags between the
intrinsic and extrinsic
EMGs after transection of the IoN. The lags
are seen to persist and remain independent of frequency (Fig. 7,
E and F). The result as a function of all
whisking episodes (n = 603, 1-s bouts) shows the
distributions were largely unchanged as a function of frequency (cf.
Fig. 7, G and H, with C and
D).
Bilateral transection of the IoN did not appear to lead to a change from a frequency-independent to a frequency-dependent phase lag (Table 1), and does not lead to a significant change in the average phase lag across animals (Fig. 8). This data implies that the phase-locked activation of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles are not dependent on sensory feedback.
|
Spectral properties of whisking: frequency distribution
An outstanding observation of whisking in our trained
animals is that they tended to whisk robustly at a single frequency within a bout and then changed that frequency between bouts (Fig. 6)
(see also Fig. 3 in O'Connor et al. 2002
). We
quantified this behavior in terms of the spectral power in the
intrinsic
EMG across bouts (Fig. 9).
On the basis of a single bout, we observed that the spectral power for
whisking was very sharp and is thus well characterized by a center
frequency, denoted f0, and a spectral width,
f0, characterized by the half-width at
half-maximum (Fig. 9A, inset). We consider first the case of
one animal for which we selected out bouts of 4 s of continuous
whisking. The spectral width for over 50% of the bouts was within the
Rayleigh frequency, or minimum resolvable bandwidth, of
fR = (4 s)
1 = 0.25 Hz (gray arrow; Fig. 9A), i.e.,
f0
fR.
|
Although the spectral width of the whisking response was sharp on a
single trial basis, there was considerable variability in the choice of
frequency, f0, between bouts. The
histogram of frequencies, expressed in terms of the probability density
function (PDF), ranged from 6 to 25 Hz for data from this animal (Fig. 9B). The PDF has an absolute maximum with a peak whisking
frequency of f0 approximately 10 Hz and a
half-width at half-maximum, denoted W, of W = 1.3 Hz. Further, there is a second, weak maximum at the higher
whisking frequency of 15 Hz. The distribution of whisking frequencies
is consistent with the description of whisking in terms of a dominant,
low-frequency exploratory mode and an infrequent, high-frequency foveal
mode (Fig. 9B). The distribution of frequencies is large
compared with the bandwidth of whisking for a single bout, i.e.,
W approximately 5 ·
f0
(cf. Fig. 9, A and B).
In principle, the narrow spectral response observed during exploratory whisking can result either from sensory feedback that acts on an otherwise irregular oscillator or as a consequence of an accurate autonomous pattern generator. To distinguish these possibilities, we repeated the measurements on the spectral properties of whisking after transection of the IoN. We observed that the spectral width of individual bouts was unchanged (Fig. 9C), and that the distribution of the spectral widths after the transection was statistically indistinguishable from that in the intact animal (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff 2-sample test with 95% confidence interval; Fig. 9C, inset). In contrast, there was a small but highly significant shift (Fig. 9D, inset) in the histogram of whisking frequencies toward lower frequencies (Fig. 9D), although the width of the low-frequency peak in the PDF of whisking frequencies was unchanged (cf. 2W in Fig. 9, B and D). In summary, the spectral purity of individual bouts of whisking does not depend on sensory feedback.
The spectral changes on transection of the IoN were examined over a
population of animals (n = 5). In all cases, we
observed no significant change in the spectral width,
fo, of the individual bouts. Nor
did we observe any change in the width in the distribution of whisking
frequencies for the dominant, low frequency peak, 2W (Table
2). However, we did observe a significant
decrease in the peak value of the distribution of whisking frequencies after the transection of the nerve. This decrease was found in all
animals and is shown in terms of the difference between the cumulated
PDFs for the intact versus the transected cases (Fig. 9E and
Table 2). It occurred mostly for the whisking frequencies below
f0 approximately 15 Hz, so that
exploratory whisking frequencies are significantly affected by the
transection. Last, there was no significant change in whisking
frequency after sham surgeries (n = 2), in which the
IoN was exposed, as in the transected cases, but was not cut
("control" in Fig. 9E).
|
Spectral properties of whisking: amplitude distribution
We return to the observation that the extrinsic muscles are
rhythmically active during exploratory whisking but are largely inactive during foveal whisking (Figs. 6, 4, P and
Q, and 5Q). We quantified this finding across
animals (4 animals and n = 2,229, 1-s bouts) in terms
of the value of the square root of the spectral power density at the
center frequency of whisking (Fig. 9A, inset); this quantity
is proportional to the amplitude of the rhythmic vibrissa motion. It
was determined across all bouts for both the intrinsic and extrinsic
EMG. Further, as a means to compare data across animals, as well as
across the same animal on different days, we normalized the spectral
power by the maximum observed value for a given animal and a given
session of measurements.
Scatter plots of our results, where each point represents the average
amplitude in a 1-s period of whisking, contain a preponderance of
values at low frequency, i.e., between 6 and 12 Hz (85% of all events;
Fig. 9B). This distribution corresponds to the prevalence of
exploratory over foveal whisking. Nonetheless, the normalized value of
the amplitude for the intrinsic
EMG is essentially constant
17 Hz
and that the amplitude is still substantial
25 Hz (solid line in Fig.
10A). In contrast, the
normalized value of the amplitude for the extrinsic
EMG is seen to
fall to near zero for whisking frequencies above 12 Hz (Fig.
10B). These data demonstrate that low-frequency, exploratory
whisking is accompanied by activity of the extrinsic as well as the
intrinsic muscles as a general phenomenon across animals.
High-frequency, foveal whisking is driven almost exclusively by the
intrinsic muscles. This difference in muscular activation provides a
distinction among the patterns of whisking observed in our behavior
task.
|
As a means to address the possible correlation between the extent
of activation of the extrinsic versus intrinsic muscles across bouts
(Fig. 10C), we constructed a scatter plot of the amplitude in the two
EMG signals for exploratory whisking. The essential conclusion is that the typical activation of the intrinsic muscles is
0.6 times of its maximum value, while the concurrent activation of the
extrinsic muscles is only 0.4 times the maximum value (+ in Fig.
10C). Furthermore, there is no significant correlation between the activation of the two muscle groups. Thus although the time
dependence of the two muscle groups is locked, their relative
amplitudes across whisking bouts is independent.
To address the possibility that the distribution of whisking amplitudes
depends on sensory feedback, we repeated the measurements on the
distribution of spectral power in the intrinsic and extrinsic muscle
EMG after transection of the IoN (n = 1,706, 1-s
bouts). We observed that the distribution of the intrinsic
EMG
amplitude was largely unchanged as a function of frequency (Fig.
10D), while the distribution of the extrinsic
EMG
amplitude slightly narrowed (Fig. 10E). With regard to the
issue of correlated activation of the follicular and extrinsic muscles
during exploratory whisking, we observed that transection of the IoN
lead to a small but significant correlation between the activation of
the two muscle groups (Fig. 10F; correlation coefficient of
0.14).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have addressed the activity of two sets of musculature whose
contraction would be expected to control the position of the vibrissae
(Fig. 3). For the relatively large amplitude sweeps associated with
exploratory whisking, both the intrinsic and the extrinsic muscle
groups are activated in an antiphasic pattern (Figs. 4, 6, 7, and 8).
The intrinsic muscles protract the vibrissae while the extrinsic
muscles are correlated with retraction (Fig. 4). In terms of the known
anatomy, protraction is accomplished through the exertion of a torque
on the follicle while retraction is accomplished by movement of the
attachment point of a follicle (Fig. 1D). The amplitude of
the activity of the two muscle groups, as inferred from the spectral
power in the respective
EMGs, are essentially uncorrelated between
whisking bouts (Fig. 10). In contrast, the peak of the activation of
the two muscle groups is approximately anti-phasic (Figs. 4, 6, 7, and
8) and independent of frequency over the 5- to 15-Hz range of
exploratory whisking (Figs. 7 and 8). This antiphasic pattern of muscle
activation persisted after transection of the trigeminal nerve (Figs. 7
and 8).
In contrast to the large amplitude sweeps associated with exploration, a second pattern of whisking, denoted foveal whisking, occurred when the animal perched and the vibrissae were thrust forward and stretched toward an object (Fig. 5). This pattern consists of relatively low-amplitude whisks in the frequency range of 15-25 Hz (Figs. 9 and 10). Protraction of the vibrissae is driven by the intrinsic muscles (Fig. 1B), while retraction is largely passive as the extrinsic muscles are essentially inactive (Figs. 6 and 10).
Active retraction and the mechanics of whisking
Based on the consideration of anatomical studies, Dorfl
(1982)
proposed that the fibrous connective tissue at the base
of the follicle could function as both a damper and a spring to allow the vibrissae to passively retract after a protraction (plate in Fig. 1
B and D). This led to the hypothesis that the
retraction of the vibrissae is a passive process, i.e., that retraction
occurs without the involvement of muscular activation. Here we confirm this for the case of foveal whisking (Figs. 5, 6, and 10). In addition, we now show that during exploratory whisking, retraction is an active
process (Figs. 4, 6-8, and 10).
From the point of view of mechanics, there are two degrees of freedom that describe the motion. These correspond to the angle of the vibrissae relative to the plane of the mystacial pad and to the position of the apex of the follicle, which serves as a pivot point (Fig. 1D). Under steady-state conditions, both degrees of freedom are phase-locked to each other throughout the whisking cycle (Figs. 7 and 8), as modeled schematically in Fig. 11. Contraction of the intrinsic muscles results in a forward rotation of the vibrissae with respect to the pivot point, i.e., protraction. In contrast, contraction of the extrinsic muscles produces a force that moves the pivot point backward and leads to counter rotation of the vibrissae, i.e., retraction. Our mechanical model anticipates an alternating activation of the intrinsic and extrinsic muscles (Fig. 11), as was observed for exploratory whisking (Figs. 6, 4, 8, and 10). Our mechanical model also provides a means to understand the passive nature of retraction observed for foveal whisking. The extrinsic muscles cannot exert an appreciable torque when the vibrissae are thrust forward, consistent with their relative silence during foveal whisking (Figs. 5, 6, and 10B).
|
Spectral purity of whisking
Rats are observed to whisk in the frequency range of 5-15 Hz when
they explore their immediate environment in search of an object or food
(Figs. 4, 6, 9, and 10). The frequencies are distributed with a mean
center value of 9 Hz (Table 1), in agreement with that found in
previous studies for exploratory whisking (Carvell et al.
1991
; Fee et al. 1997
; O'Connor et al.
2002
; Welker 1964
), and a full bandwidth of 2.5 Hz (Table 2). We further observed that the purity of whisking is very
high, in the sense that the rat maintains a fixed frequency of whisking
across a given bout to within the theoretical limit of spectral
resolution (Fig. 9A). Thus for a 4-s bout of whisking with a
frequency of f0 = 9 Hz, the fractional
variability across the bout is
f0/f0 = (1/4
s)(1/9 Hz)
0.03. Interesting, the frequency varies between
different bouts over a much larger distribution (Table 2). These data
suggest that the rat may use a frequency-based scheme for the detection of vibrissa contact during the whisk cycle (Ahissar et al.
1997
; Ahissar 1998
; Ahrens et al.
2002
; Kleinfeld et al. 1999
; see Ahissar and Kleinfeld 2002
for review). The reason for the change in
frequency and amplitudes between bouts is not clear, but could
constitute a means to circumvent entrainment and adaptation of neuronal
oscillatory circuits.
Sensory deafferentation and whisking
Deflection of the vibrissae relative to that of the follicle, as
would occur during contact of the hair with an object, is relayed via
the infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (Dorfl 1985
; Rice and Arvidsson 1991
) ("sn" in Fig.
1A) to the trigeminal nuclei. In turn, trigeminal nuclei
provide input to higher brain areas and putative inhibitory feedback to
the lateral facial nucleus. We show that bilateral transections of the
IoN do not effect the spectral purity of whisking during exploratory
whisking (cf. Fig. 9, A and C). Furthermore, the
transections do not compromise the phase relation between the intrinsic
muscles and the extrinsic muscles (Figs. 7 and 8; Table 1). These data
lend support to the notion of a highly precise central pattern
generator for whisking.
With regard to the effect of bilateral transections of the IoN on the
distribution of whisking frequencies, an early report by Welker
(1964)
showed a decrement in the average center frequency of
whisking from 8 to 6 Hz following deafferentation of the mystacial pads. These experiments involved the use of free ranging animals, similar to those in the present study. In qualitative support of this
result, we observed a statistically significant decrement in whisking
frequency on bilateral transection of the IoN (cf. Fig. 9, B
and D). This decrement occurred across all animals with an
average magnitude of about 1 Hz (Fig. 9C; Table 2). It is of
note that under the behavioral paradigm of a head-fixed preparation and
different sampling conditions, the reduction in whisking frequency is
not seen under similar nerve transection (Gao et al.
2001
).
Candidate models for a whisking central pattern generator
We considered generic circuits for the generation of a two-phase rhythm for whisking (Fig. 11). The first circuit is a serial scheme that relies on sensory feedback (Fig. 12A). The second and third models involve complementary scheme to autonomously generate a two phase output (Fig. 12, B and C). We argue that the first scheme is inconsistent with the data.
|
In the serial scheme, a single oscillator, or oscillatory network, drives the motoneurons that control the intrinsic muscles (Fig. 12A). This motion is sensed via the trigeminal innervation of the vibrissae and used to signal the motoneurons that drive the extrinsic muscles. The time delay between the muscle groups is thus a constant, so that the phase-lag should vary as a linear function of frequency (light gray lines in Fig. 7, C and G). We reject this model on two grounds. First, the alternation between muscle groups should not persist in the absence of sensory feedback. Yet this alternation is unaffected by transection of the IoN (Figs. 7, E, F, and G, and 8). Second, even if a yet undiscovered sensory pathway exists along the facial nerve, this model implies that the alternation in phase between the two muscle groups should depend on the frequency of whisking. Yet the observed alternation is independent of frequency (Figs. 7 and 8; Table 1).
The second model used a single oscillator in a push-pull arrangement
(Fig. 12B). The oscillator drives the motoneurons for the
set of intrinsic muscles either directly, or through excitatory interneurons, and drives the set of motoneurons for the extrinsic muscles through inhibitory interneurons. This can lead to the observed
antiphasic relation between the two muscle groups (Fig. 4Q).
Inhibitory interneurons that contact the facial motoneurons have been
reported (Li et al. 1997
). An additional tonic input that is required to bias the motoneurons that are driven by inhibitory input could be provided by serotonergic projections (Dolphin and Greengard 1981
; McCall and Aghajanian 1979
). The
push-pull model does not depend on sensory feedback. However, the phase
difference between the activation of the two muscles groups depends on
the relative time-lag between the pathway to the intrinsic muscles, denoted
I, and the pathway to the extrinsic
muscles, denoted
E, i.e.,
= 2
fwhisk(
E
I). To estimate the feasibility of this
model, we equate the slope d
/df = 2
(
E
I) with the
SD of ±0.03 radians/Hz for the measured value of
d
/df (Table 1). This implies that
E
I <5 ms, a
time difference that is small, although not inconsistent with the
jitter in the activation of interneurons.
The third model consisted of two coupled oscillators (Fig.
12C). This circuit generates a constant phase relation
between the two oscillators through a set of mutual reciprocal
connections (Hansel et al. 1993
; von der
Vreeswijk et al. 1994
). Candidate oscillators are likely to be
located in the medulla and may involve reciprocal connections between
the parvicellular or gigantocellular reticular nucleus and the lateral
aspect of the facial nucleus (Fay and Norgren 1997
;
Hattox et al. 2001
; Isokawa-Akesson and Komisaruk
1987
; Mogoseanu et al. 1994
). The output of the
coupled oscillator model is independent of sensory feedback and the
phase versus frequency relation is a constant by construction. While the behavior of both the push-pull model and the coupled oscillator model are consistent with the data, we favor the latter model based
solely on it's relative simplicity and on the known stability of
coupled oscillator systems (Kopell and Ermentrout 1986
).
To summarize, the interpretation of our data suggest that the neuronal
drive to the muscles for both exploratory and foveal whisking can be
modeled in terms of a two-phase central pattern generator. This
oscillator is presumably activated by high-level tonic input, similar
to the case of mastication (Nakamura and Katakura 1995
;
Nozaki et al. 1986
). Three independent signals, one that
is used to set the frequency of whisking and two that are used to
control the maximum amplitude of the intrinsic and the extrinsic
musculature, respectively, must be specified for each whisking bout.
Anatomical studies have identified direct and indirect projections from
vibrissa motor cortex to hindbrain nuclei that are candidates to carry
these signals (Hattox et al. 2001
; Miyashita and
Shigemi 1995
; Miyashita et al. 1994
). The details of this surprisingly highly tuned circuitry remain to be unraveled.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank F. F. Ebner and R.N.S. Sachdev for critical discussions, B. Friedman for instruction with the nerve transection, S. Hefler for assistance with the animal husbandry, G. A. White for programming of the video camera interface, and B. Friedman and H. P. Zeigler for comments on an early version of this work.
This study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and the Whitehall Foundation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: D. Kleinfeld, Dept. of Physics 0319, Univ. of California, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 (E-mail: dk{at}physics.ucsd.edu).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Arfin, M. A. Long, M. S. Fee, and R. Sarpeshkar Wireless Neural Stimulation in Freely Behaving Small Animals J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 598 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Grant, B. Mitchinson, C. W. Fox, and T. J. Prescott Active Touch Sensing in the Rat: Anticipatory and Regulatory Control of Whisker Movements During Surface Exploration J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 862 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Heiss, Y. Katz, E. Ganmor, and I. Lampl Shift in the Balance between Excitation and Inhibition during Sensory Adaptation of S1 Neurons J. Neurosci., December 3, 2008; 28(49): 13320 - 13330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lottem and R. Azouz Dynamic Translation of Surface Coarseness Into Whisker Vibrations J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2852 - 2865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Towal and M. J. Z. Hartmann Variability in Velocity Profiles During Free-Air Whisking Behavior of Unrestrained Rats J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 740 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Moxon Natural Whisking. Focus on "Variability in Velocity Profiles During Free-Air Whisking Behavior of Unrestrained Rats" J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 551 - 553. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Herfst and M. Brecht Whisker Movements Evoked by Stimulation of Single Motor Neurons in the Facial Nucleus of the Rat J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2821 - 2832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Hill, R. Bermejo, H. P. Zeigler, and D. Kleinfeld Biomechanics of the Vibrissa Motor Plant in Rat: Rhythmic Whisking Consists of Triphasic Neuromuscular Activity J. Neurosci., March 26, 2008; 28(13): 3438 - 3455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Tan, H. Hu, Z. J. Huang, and A. Agmon Robust but delayed thalamocortical activation of dendritic-targeting inhibitory interneurons PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 2187 - 2192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Pearson, A. G. Pipe, C. Melhuish, B. Mitchinson, and T. J. Prescott Whiskerbot: A Robotic Active Touch System Modeled on the Rat Whisker Sensory System Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 2007; 15(3): 223 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kepecs, N. Uchida, and Z. F. Mainen Rapid and Precise Control of Sniffing During Olfactory Discrimination in Rats J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mitchinson, C. J Martin, R. A Grant, and T. J Prescott Feedback control in active sensing: rat exploratory whisking is modulated by environmental contact Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2007; 274(1613): 1035 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Castro-Alamancos What Generates Whisking? Focus on: "The Whisking Rhythm Generator: A Novel Mammalian Network for the Generation of Movement" J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1883 - 1884. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Katz, J. E. Heiss, and I. Lampl Cross-Whisker Adaptation of Neurons in the Rat Barrel Cortex J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13363 - 13372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Melzer, R. N. S. Sachdev, N. Jenkinson, and F. F. Ebner Stimulus Frequency Processing in Awake Rat Barrel Cortex. J. Neurosci., November 22, 2006; 26(47): 12198 - 12205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Castro-Alamancos Vibrissa Myoclonus (Rhythmic Retractions) Driven by Resonance of Excitatory Networks in Motor Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1691 - 1698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Derdikman, C. Yu, S. Haidarliu, K. Bagdasarian, A. Arieli, and E. Ahissar Layer-Specific Touch-Dependent Facilitation and Depression in the Somatosensory Cortex during Active Whisking. J. Neurosci., September 13, 2006; 26(37): 9538 - 9547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Towal and M. J. Hartmann Right-left asymmetries in the whisking behavior of rats anticipate head movements. J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8838 - 8846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Knutsen, M. Pietr, and E. Ahissar Haptic Object Localization in the Vibrissal System: Behavior and Performance. J. Neurosci., August 15, 2006; 26(33): 8451 - 8464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Cramer and A. Keller Cortical Control of a Whisking Central Pattern Generator J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2006; 96(1): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Berg, D. Whitmer, and D. Kleinfeld Exploratory whisking by rat is not phase locked to the hippocampal theta rhythm. J. Neurosci., June 14, 2006; 26(24): 6518 - 6522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Szwed, K. Bagdasarian, B. Blumenfeld, O. Barak, D. Derdikman, and E. Ahissar Responses of Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons to the Radial Distance of Contact During Active Vibrissal Touch J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 791 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Friedman, L. M. Jones, N. P. Cramer, E. E. Kwegyir-Afful, H. P. Zeigler, and A. Keller Anticipatory Activity of Motor Cortex in Relation to Rhythmic Whisking J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 1274 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Grinevich, M. Brecht, and P. Osten Monosynaptic Pathway from Rat Vibrissa Motor Cortex to Facial Motor Neurons Revealed by Lentivirus-Based Axonal Tracing J. Neurosci., September 7, 2005; 25(36): 8250 - 8258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Long, S. J. Cruikshank, M. J. Jutras, and B. W. Connors Abrupt Maturation of a Spike-Synchronizing Mechanism in Neocortex J. Neurosci., August 10, 2005; 25(32): 7309 - 7316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Berg, B. Friedman, L. F. Schroeder, and D. Kleinfeld Activation of Nucleus Basalis Facilitates Cortical Control of a Brain Stem Motor Program J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 699 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-Z. Shaw and Y.-F. Liao Relation Between Activities of the Cortex and Vibrissae Muscles During High-Voltage Rhythmic Spike Discharges in Rats J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2435 - 2448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Knutsen, D. Derdikman, and E. Ahissar Tracking Whisker and Head Movements in Unrestrained Behaving Rodents J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 2294 - 2301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Haiss and C. Schwarz Spatial Segregation of Different Modes of Movement Control in the Whisker Representation of Rat Primary Motor Cortex J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1579 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhang and K. D. Alloway Stimulus-Induced Intercolumnar Synchronization of Neuronal Activity in Rat Barrel Cortex: A Laminar Analysis J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1464 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Ahrens and D. Kleinfeld Current Flow in Vibrissa Motor Cortex Can Phase-Lock With Exploratory Rhythmic Whisking in Rat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1700 - 1707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ganguly and D. Kleinfeld Goal-directed whisking increases phase-locking between vibrissa movement and electrical activity in primary sensory cortex in rat PNAS, August 17, 2004; 101(33): 12348 - 12353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Wilent and D. Contreras Synaptic Responses to Whisker Deflections in Rat Barrel Cortex as a Function of Cortical Layer and Stimulus Intensity J. Neurosci., April 21, 2004; 24(16): 3985 - 3998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q.-T. Nguyen, R. Wessel, and D. Kleinfeld Developmental regulation of active and passive membrane properties in rat vibrissa motoneurones J. Physiol., April 1, 2004; 556(1): 203 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-E. Jin, V. Witzemann, and M. Brecht Fiber Types of the Intrinsic Whisker Muscle and Whisking Behavior J. Neurosci., March 31, 2004; 24(13): 3386 - 3393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Berg and D. Kleinfeld Vibrissa Movement Elicited by Rhythmic Electrical Microstimulation to Motor Cortex in the Aroused Rat Mimics Exploratory Whisking J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 2950 - 2963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Arabzadeh, R. S. Petersen, and M. E. Diamond Encoding of Whisker Vibration by Rat Barrel Cortex Neurons: Implications for Texture Discrimination J. Neurosci., October 8, 2003; 23(27): 9146 - 9154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Garabedian, S. R. Jones, M. M. Merzenich, A. Dale, and C. I. Moore Band-Pass Response Properties of Rat SI Neurons J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1379 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Neimark, M. L. Andermann, J. J. Hopfield, and C. I. Moore Vibrissa Resonance as a Transduction Mechanism for Tactile Encoding J. Neurosci., July 23, 2003; 23(16): 6499 - 6509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Hartmann, N. J. Johnson, R. B. Towal, and C. Assad Mechanical Characteristics of Rat Vibrissae: Resonant Frequencies and Damping in Isolated Whiskers and in the Awake Behaving Animal J. Neurosci., July 23, 2003; 23(16): 6510 - 6519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |