|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (January 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.00488.2002
Submitted on Submitted 20 June 2002; accepted in final form 10 October 2002
Departments of 1Pediatrics (Section of Respiratory Medicine) and 2Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Xia, Ying, Peng Zhao, Jin Xue, Xiang Q. Gu, Xiaolu Sun, Hang Yao, and Gabriel G. Haddad. Na+ Channel Expression and Neuronal Function in the Na+/H+ Exchanger 1 Null Mutant Mouse. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 229-236, 2003. Mice lacking Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1) suffer from recurrent seizures and die early postnatally. Although the mechanisms for seizures are not well established, our previous electrophysiological work has shown that neuronal excitability and Na+ current density are increased in hippocampal CA1 neurons of these mutant mice. However, it is unknown whether this increased density is related to altered expression or functional regulation of Na+ channels. In this work, we asked three questions: is the increased excitability limited to CA1 neurons, is the increased Na+ current density related to an increased Na+ channel expression, and, if so, which Na+ channel subtype(s) is upregulated? Using neurophysiological, autoradiographic, and immunoblotting techniques, we showed that both CA1 and cortical neurons have an increase in membrane excitability and Na+ current density; Na+ channel density is selectively upregulated in the hippocampus and cortex (P < 0.05); and Na+ channel subtype I is significantly increased in the hippocampus and Na+ channel subtype II is increased in the cortex. Our results demonstrate that mice lacking NHE1 upregulate their Na+ channel expression in the hippocampal and cortical regions selectively; this leads to an increase in Na+ current density and membrane excitability. We speculate that neuronal overexcitability due to Na+ channel upregulation in the hippocampus and cortex forms the basis of epileptic seizures in NHE1 mutant mice.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuronal function
depends in a major way on plasma membrane protein expression
(Banasiak et al. 2000
; Cummins et al.
1994
; Fanning and Anderson 1999
;
Haddad and Jiang 1993
). An abnormal expression of
membrane proteins may lead to disturbed neuronal function and
neurological disorders (Banasiak et al. 2000
;
Haddad and Jiang 1993
; Steinlein et al.
2000
; Xia et al. 2000
). For example, mice lacking Na+/H+
exchanger 1 (NHE1) show epileptic seizures, which appear by age 2-3 wk
postnatally, leading to an early death in most cases (Bell et
al. 1999
; Cox et al. 1997
). The basis
for the seizures in the mice is not well understood.
Using an electrophysiological approach, we have recently observed that
neuronal excitability and Na+ current density
are increased in freshly dissociated hippocampal neurons from
these mice (Gu et al. 2001
). Because
Na+ channels are critical for setting the firing
threshold and neuronal excitability (Cummins et al.
1993
; Catterall 1992
; Urenjak and Obrenovitch 1996
; Xia et al. 2000
), it is highly
likely that an increase in the macroscopic Na+
currents could play a central role in facilitating the induction of
seizures in these mutant mice. It is not known, however, whether this
Na+ current upregulation is related to an
increase in Na+ channel density or to an
alteration in Na+ channel conductance or open
probability. Furthermore, it is not clear as to whether these changes
in the Na+ current are limited to one region or
more generalized in the CNS. We have therefore performed this work to
determine whether Na+ channel expression is
altered in multiple regions of the NHE1 null mutant brain. To provide
correlative functional analysis, we also used electrophysiological
techniques to study the properties of neurons in two different regions,
i.e., the CA1 area and the neocortex.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
B6SJL, +/swe (slow-wave epilepsy) mice were obtained
from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) (Cox et al.
1997
). These heterozygous mice were mated in our institution
and the resulting homozygous NHE1 mutant (25%) F1 mice progeny were
used between postnatal days 20 and 30. All animal procedures were
performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care
Committee of Yale University School of Medicine, which is accredited by
the American Association of Laboratory Animal Care.
NHE1 mutant mice genotyping
Although homozygous mutant mice had a clear phenotype consisting
of locomotor ataxia in the hindlimbs and slow, wide-based gait and
coarse truncal instability starting at ~2-3 wk of age, we performed
genotyping on all presumed mutant mice to confirm the phenotype with a
PCR-based test. This has been described in previous publications
(Yao et al. 1999
).
Chemicals and reagents
3H-saxitoxin (21 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL). Unlabeled saxitoxin (STX) was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA) and tetrodotoxin (TTX) was from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemicals and Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI).
Tissue preparation
The animals were decapitated after halothane inhalational
anesthesia and their brains were rapidly removed. For patch-clamp recording, the CA1 and neocortex were dissected out for neuronal dissociation. For autoradiographic studies, brains from age-matched control mice were simultaneously removed and frozen in dry ice-cold 2-methylbutane and then stored at
80°C freezer. Ten-micrometer coronal sections were cut in a Hacker-Bright cryostat at
20°C and
mounted onto gelatin-coated microscope slides. For Western blots, the
hippocampal and cortical tissues were dissected out and pooled for
microsomal preparations.
Cell preparation for patch recording
The hippocampus and cortex were removed from the animals and sliced into 7-10 transverse sections of 400 µm thick. The slices were immediately transferred to a container with 10 ml of fresh, oxygenated, and slightly stirred HEPES buffer at room temperature. After 30 min of exposure to trypsin (0.08%) and 20 min of protease (0.05%) digestion, the slices were washed several times with HEPES buffer and left in oxygenated solution. The CA1 or cortical tissues were then dissected out and triturated in a small volume (0.25 ml) of HEPES buffer.
Electrophysiological solutions
The external HEPES solution bathing neurons for enzymatic treatment and electrophysiological recording contained (in mM) 130 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4). The pipette solution for whole cell patch electrodes contained (in mM) 138 KCl, 0.2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES (Na+ salt), and 10 EGTA, and an adjusted pH of 7.4 with Tris. Osmolarity of all solutions was adjusted to 290 mOsm.
Recording criteria
MORPHOLOGICAL CRITERIA.
Cells were used if they had a smooth surface, had a three-dimensional
contour, and were pyramidal in shape. Similar criteria have been used
by us (Cummins et al. 1993
; Gu et al.
2001
) and others (Hamill et al. 1981
) on freshly
triturated neurons.
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL CRITERIA.
Neurons were considered for recording if the seal resistance was >5
G
, a holding current was <0.1 nA (command potential
100 mV), and
series resistance was <10 M
. The series resistances were
compensated at 90% level with the Axopatch 1C amplifier (Axon Instruments). Under these conditions, the error caused by uncompensated series resistances was <5 mV. To obtain adequate voltage clamp and
minimize the space-clamp problem, only small neurons with short
processes were used in INa+ measurements.
Electrophysiological recordings
Electrodes were pulled on a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller
(Model P-87, Sutter Instrument) from filamented borosilicate capillary
glass (1.2 mm OD, 0.69 mm ID, World Precision Instruments). The
electrodes were fire-polished, and their resistances were 2-5 M
for
voltage-clamp experiments and 5-8 M
for current-clamp experiments.
Action potentials were recorded in the current-clamp mode, and
Rm was measured at
70 mV as a slope
of the current trace evoked by a ramp voltage from
160 to 100 mV in
the voltage-clamp mode against the voltage. Current traces were
leak-subtracted, and Vm was measured
at current-clamp mode with no holding current. Junction potentials were
nulled for each individual cell with the Axopatch 1C amplifier. All
recordings were performed at room temperature (22-24°C).
3H-STX binding and autoradiography
The methods used are the same as in our previous work
(Cummins et al. 1993
; Xia and Haddad
1993
; Xia et al. 2000
). In brief, mouse brains
were cut at three major levels, i.e., rostral, midbrain and brain stem
levels. At each level, two to four consecutive sections were used for
autoradiography. All slice-mounted slides were preincubated for 15 min
in the binding buffer [(in mM) 20 Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 140 N-methyl-D-glucamine, 5.4 KCl, 2.8 CaCl2, and 1.3 MgSO4] to
remove putative endogenous ligand. Brain tissues were then labeled at
room temperature for 60 min in the same buffer with 4 nM
3H-STX. Nonspecific binding was measured in
separate slices from the same brain levels of the same mice by adding 5 µM of unlabeled TTX in the binding buffer. The incubated slides were
rinsed in seven different jars containing the same buffer without any
labeled or unlabelled STX at 4°C and finally in a jar containing cold distilled water. The total rinsing time was ~30 s. Well-dried slides
were organized in cassettes and exposed to
3H-Ultrofilm (Fluca) with tritium standards for 3 wk. All age-matched pairs of mutant and control mice were performed
simultaneously from tissue preparation to film exposure. The films were
then developed in Kodak D-19 developer. The resulting autoradiograms were processed by means of a computerized image system. After the film
background was corrected, STX binding density was quantified by Scion
Image analysis software.
Immunoblotting
The tissues of cortex and hippocampus from four animals were
separately dissected out, weighed, pooled, and transferred to lysis
buffer as one sample (4 × vol/wt; 200 mM mannitol, 80 mM HEPES,
41 mM KOH, 1 µM pepstatin A, 1 µM leupeptin, 230 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM ethylenediamine
tetrahydrochloride; pH 7.5) for the microsomal preparation according to
a method described by Grassl and Aronson (1986)
. The
tissues were then homogenized with a Teflon-glass homogenizer (Thomas
Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ). The homogenate was centrifuged at
1,000g, 4°C for 10 min to remove cellular debris. The
supernatant was re-centrifuged at 100,000g, 4°C in a
Beckman SW40T rotor for 1 h. The resulting pellet was re-suspended
in 200-500 µl of lysis buffer and protein concentrations were
determined using a DC Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad, Herculus, CA). Thirty
micrograms of membrane protein of each region was resolved on 10%
precast NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and
electro-transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes
(Immobilin-P, Millipore, Bedford, MA). The affinity-purified rabbit
polyclonal antibodies against Na+ channel type I
(1:800 dilution), type II (1:600), and type III (1:120) (Sigma) were
applied, respectively. Protein signals were detected using an ECL
chemiluminescence system (Amersham). For normalization, all the
membranes were stripped and re-probed with affinity-purified goat
polyclonal antibody to actin at the dilution of 1:1000 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Four to five pooled samples were
studies for each group.
Data analysis
In the electrophysiological experiments, data from the same
group were averaged and subjected to one-tailed Student
t-test. For STX binding density, all measurements from
bilateral areas were averaged as a single value for a given section
image. At least two-section images per brain level were analyzed in
either mutant or control mice. All values from different sections in a
given animal were averaged as one value for a brain region. To compare
alterations in STX binding density in various brain regions, changes in
STX binding density in mutant mice were converted to percent change
based on its control level (100%). Values were subjected to
statistical analysis with unpaired t-test. For
immunoblotting assay, scanning densitometry of immunoblot films was
performed on a Personal Densitometer SI scanner (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA) and analyzed with the aid of ImageQuaNT image analysis
software (Molecular Dynamics). Data were represented as ratios of
proteins to the corresponding actins. For values of percentage,
data from the age-matched wild-type mice were considered as 100%
control. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis. All values in the text were expressed as means ± SE. Differences in means were considered significant if P
0.05.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased neuronal excitability in hippocampal and cortical neurons
We focused our electrophysiological studies on neurons from the hippocampal CA1 and neocortical neurons and observed major differences in membrane properties and excitability between the mutant and control mice (Fig. 1).
|
NEURONAL PROPERTIES AND MEMBRANE EXCITABILITY OF CA1 NEURONS.
We used HEPES-containing solutions in this study, with
Vm around
40 mV (in bicarbonate
solutions, Vm was in the range of
50
mV). We observed that Vm and
Rm in hippocampal CA1 neurons of the
wild-type were similar to those of the NHE null mutant (Vm was
39 ± 4 mV,
n = 14 and
39 ± 2 mV, n = 23;
and Rm was 617 ± 301 M
,
n = 12 and 511 ± 92 M
, n = 21 for the wild-type and the mutant, respectively). However, CA1 neurons
in the NHE null mutant were much more excitable than wild-type CA1
neurons in spite of the lack of difference in
Vm and
Rm. The rheobase in the wild-type
neurons, for example, was more than double that of the NHE1 mutant
neurons (53.3 ± 14.7 pA, n = 14 for the wild-type neurons vs. 23.6 ± 7.6 pA, n = 12 for the NHE
null neurons, P = 0.05; Fig. 1).
NEURONAL PROPERTIES AND MEMBRANE EXCITABILITY OF CORTICAL NEURONS.
In HEPES solutions, wild-type cortical neurons were more depolarized
than NHE1 null mutant neurons (
27 ± 4 mV, n = 9 for wild-type and
38 ± 3 mV, n = 16 for mutant,
P = 0.01). Both groups had variable
Rm (724 ± 218 M
,
n = 9 and 1,035 ± 230 M
, n = 16 for wild-type and mutant, respectively, P = 0.19).
Cortical neurons in the NHE null mutant were, however, as in the CA1
neurons, more excitable than wild-type neurons (Fig. 1). The rheobase
in the wild-type neurons was significantly higher than that of NHE1
mutant neurons (55.0 ± 14.4 pA, n = 13 for the
wild-type neurons vs. 32.6 ± 5.9 pA, n = 28 for
the NHE null neurons, P < 0.05).
Increased Na+ current density in hippocampal and cortical neurons
Because we found major differences in excitability between mutant and wild-type neurons without difference in Vm or Rm, we next investigated whether there is any difference in Na+ current density between the mutant and control mice (Fig. 2).
|
MAJOR INCREASE IN NA+ CURRENT DENSITY IN HIPPOCAMPAL CA1 NEURONS. In hippocampal CA1 neurons, the peak Na+ current in the NHE null neurons was much larger compared with that of wild-type neurons (5.3 ± 0.9 nA, n = 23 for the NHE null neurons and 2.7 ± 0.7 nA, n = 15 for the wild type, P = 0.02). Similarly, the current density was also significantly larger in the mutant than wild type (0.65 ± 0.08 nA/pF, n = 23 for the NHE null neurons and 0.44 ± 0.08 nA/pF, n = 14 for the wild-type neurons, P = 0.04).
INCREASED NA+ CURRENT DENSITY IN NEOCORTICAL NEURONS. The peak Na+ current of NHE null cortical neurons was significantly larger, compared with that of wild-type neurons (1.2 ± 0.1 nA, n = 29 for the NHE null neurons and 0.77 ± 0.1 nA, n = 16 for the wild types, P < 0.02). The current density of the NHE null neurons was also significant larger (0.4 ± 0.3 nA/pF, n = 27 for the NHE null neurons and 0.3 ± 0.04 nA/pF, n = 16 for the wild-type neurons, P = 0.04).
Selective upregulation of Na+ channel density in hippocampus and cortex
Because Na+ channel expression is a major factor that determines Na+ current density, we measured the STX binding density to compare Na+ channel expression between the mutant and wild-type mice and found that Na+ channel expression was selectively upregulated in cortical and hippocampal regions (Figs. 3 and 4).
|
|
NA+ CHANNEL UP-REGULATION IN CORTICAL AND HIPPOCAMPAL REGIONS. STX binding density increased in most cortical regions of NHE1 null mice (Fig. 3A), but the increase was heterogeneous. For example, STX binding density increased by 17% (n = 7, P < 0.05) in the striate cortex and by 11% (n = 7, P < 0.05) in the temporal cortex of NHE1 null mutant mice as compared with that in wild-type. In contrast, other regions such as the frontoparietal cortex and entorhinal cortex of the mutant mice had virtually no increase in STX binding density. In the hippocampus, only the pyramidal cell layer of the CA1 region showed an increase of 12% (n = 7, P < 0.001) in the mutant as compared with control mice (Fig. 3A). The quantitative changes in major cortical and hippocampal regions are shown in Fig. 4A.
It is noteworthy that the upregulation of Na+ channel expression was not consistent with that of Na+ current density (Fig. 5). In CA1 region, for instance, Na+ current density increased by >45% although Na+ channel expression increased by only 11%. In the cortical region, however, Na+ current density increased by ~30% in spite of a larger increase in Na+ channel density (+17%).
|
NO MAJOR CHANGE IN STX BINDING DENSITY WITHIN MOST SUBCORTICAL AND OTHER REGIONS. In most subcortical regions, STX binding density had no appreciable change in the NHE1 mutant brains as documented in Figs. 3 and 4B. In the thalamus, STX binding density tended to increase only in the medial part of the ventroposterior thalamic nucleus (VP, 14%), but this change was not statistically significant (P > 0.05, n = 7). In the midbrain, the only region showing an upregulation of Na+ channel expression was the superior colliculus (SC, 13%, n = 7, P < 0.05). Some brain stem nuclei actually exhibited higher STX binding density. For example, raphe obscurus nucleus (ROb) showed a higher level of STX binding density as compared with wild-type (22%, n = 7, P < 0.05; Figs. 3 and 4B). However, no significant increase in STX binding density was found in most brain stem regions. In other brain regions, like the cerebellum, STX binding density tended even to decrease although the change was not statistically significant.
Differential regulation of Na+ channel subtypes in the hippocampus and cortex
Because there are three major neuronal subtypes of Na+ channels in the brain, we further asked which subtype(s) is upregulated in the hippocampus and cortex. To differentiate subtypes I to III, we performed immunoblotting using antibodies against the neuronal isoforms of the Na+ channel and discovered that distinct subtypes of Na+ channels contributed to the Na+ channel upregulation differentially in different regions. Figure 6 shows a significant increase (27%, n = 4, P < 0.05) of subtype II in the cortex and an increase (18%, n = 5, P < 0.05) of subtype I in the hippocampus. In addition, Na+ channel subtype III was expressed at very low level in both cortex and hippocampus and thus no obvious difference was detected between NHE1 null mutants and their wild-type controls. In contrast, other regions, such as cerebellum, tended to decrease both Na+ channel subtypes I and II in the NHE1 mutant as compared with wild type (data not shown).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have made two important observations in this work. First, Na+ channel expression is selectively upregulated in the cortex and hippocampus of the NHE1 mutant mice. Second, the cortical and hippocampal regions, which showed an increased STX binding, also showed an increase in the size of the Na+ current as well as increased membrane excitability. Our data suggest that NHE1 null mutation leads to Na+ channel dysregulation and thus increases neuronal excitability.
A number of factors may alter Na+ channel
expression and function (O'Reilly et al. 1997
;
Urenjak and Obrenovitch 1996
; Xia et al.
2000
). In this work, we have shown that the whole cell Na+ current is upregulated in the CA1 and
neocortex in the NHE1 null mutant mice. This increase in the
Na+ current can be a result of increased
expression, increased open probability (Po) or
increased conductance (i). The STX binding studies that showed
increased density in the same regions from which the triturated cells
were taken, strongly suggest that the increased whole cell current is
at least partly due to the increased expression of
Na+ channels. However, this result does not rule
out a change in Na+ channel open probability or
conductance. As shown in Fig. 5, the increase in whole cell current is
larger than the difference in the upregulation of STX binding density
in CA1 and neocortical neurons. These data suggest that the increase in
Na+ current density is not solely dependent on an
increase in Na+ channel number, other factors may
also play a role in the increase of Na+ currents
in mutant neurons.
There are multiple Na+ channel subtypes in the
brain (Caterall 1992
; Urenjak and Obrenovitch
1996
). Their regulation under various physiological and
pathophysiological conditions is not well understood. Our present work
shows that Na+ channels I and II are
differentially upregulated in the hippocampus and cortex, suggesting
that different mechanisms underlie the regional upregulation of
Na+ channels in the mutant neurons. Such
regionally and differentially regulated Na+
channel isoforms have been described in other pathophysiological conditions such as hypoxia (Zhang et al. 2001
) and nerve
cell injury (Waxman et al. 1994
).
One important and interesting issue is the relation between
Na+ channels and NHE1. In this work, we show
that, in the absence of NHE1, certain Na+ channel
isoforms are upregulated in certain specific cells or regions of the
CNS. This raises a number of questions. For instance, we have
previously shown that NHE isoform 1 is ubiquitously expressed in the
CNS (Ma and Haddad 1997
). Hence, one could ask: why is Na+ channel expression upregulated in certain
specific regions and not ubiquitously? Another question is whether
there is an interaction, physical or indirect, between NHE1 and the
Na+ channel. At present, we do not have any
evidence suggesting a direct interaction. However, it is possible that
the lack of NHE1 leads to alterations in other membrane proteins or
intracellular signals that, in turn, alter Na+
channel expression in neurons. This notion of altered
Na+ channel expression may not be surprising as
the expression of other membrane proteins is also altered in the same
NHE1 null mutant mouse (Xue et al. 2002
). It would be
interesting to speculate that Na+ transport is
affected in this null mouse because the Na+
transport-related proteins such as the
Na+-HCO3
cotransporter, the Na+-H+
exchanger, and the Na+ channels, are all
affected. Based on our work, we would also like to emphasize that the
phenotype in a particular gene knock-out animal may not be related
directly to that gene but to the effect of other genes that are
influenced by the knock-out of that gene.
In summary, we have observed that Na+ channel expression is selectively upregulated in the cortex and hippocampus in NHE1 null mice; this leads to a significant increase in Na+ current density and membrane excitability. Our data suggest that Na+ channel upregulation induces neuronal overexcitability in the cortex and hippocampus, which may form the basis of epileptic seizures in NHE1 null mice. However, we could not rule out the possibility that other membrane proteins also contribute to the pathogenesis of seizure activity in the NHE1 null mutant mice. The molecular mechanisms underlying the Na+ channel upregulation in the mutant need further investigation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by March of Dimes (FY00-722) and National Institutes of Health Grants to Y. Xia (R01 HD-34852) and to G. G. Haddad (P01 HD-32573 and R01 NS-35918).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: Y. Xia, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., LMP 3107, New Haven, CT 06520 (E-mail: ying.xia{at}yale.edu).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-N. Liu and C. J. Somps Na+/H+ Exchanger-1 Inhibitors Reduce Neuronal Excitability and Alter Na+ Channel Inactivation Properties in Rat Primary Sensory Neurons Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2008; 103(2): 346 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chao, A. Bazzy-Asaad, G. Balboni, S. Salvadori, and Y. Xia Activation of DOR Attenuates Anoxic K+ Derangement via Inhibition of Na+ Entry in Mouse Cortex Cereb Cortex, January 17, 2008; (2008) bhm247v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xue, D. Zhou, H. Yao, O. Gavrialov, M. J. McConnell, B. D. Gelb, and G. G. Haddad Novel functional interaction between Na+/H+ exchanger 1 and tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2406 - R2416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Luo, H. Chen, D. B. Kintner, G. E. Shull, and D. Sun Decreased Neuronal Death in Na+/H+ Exchanger Isoform 1-Null Mice after In Vitro and In Vivo Ischemia J. Neurosci., December 7, 2005; 25(49): 11256 - 11268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Brett, M. Donowitz, and R. Rao Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): C223 - C239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zhou, J. Xue, O. Gavrialov, and G. G. Haddad Na+/H+ exchanger 1 deficiency alters gene expression in mouse brain Physiol Genomics, August 11, 2004; 18(3): 331 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |