|
|
||||||||
J Neurophysiol (April 1, 2003). 10.1152/jn.01008.2002
Submitted on Submitted 6 November 2002; accepted in final form 3 December 2002
Department of Biological Sciences, Allergan Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, California 92612
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dong, Cun-Jian and William A. Hare. Temporal Modulation of Scotopic Visual Signals by A17 Amacrine Cells in Mammalian Retina In Vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 2159-2166, 2003. We examined function of the feedback pathway from A17 GABAergic amacrine cells to rod bipolar cells (A17 feedback), a critically located inhibitory circuit in the classic rod pathway of the mammalian retina whose role in processing of scotopic visual information is still poorly understood. We show evidence that this A17 feedback has a profound influence on the temporal properties of rod-driven postphotoreceptoral responses (assessed with the scotopic electroretinogram b-wave). Application of a GABAc antagonist prolonged preferentially the decay of the scotopic b-wave. The degree of prolongation increased as the light intensity decreased. Application of selective GABAa antagonists accelerated the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave. This effect was abolished when the GABAc antagonist was coapplied. Selective ablation of A17 cells mimicked the action of the GABAc antagonist. In A17 cell-ablated retinas, the GABAc antagonist was no longer very effective to slow the decay of the scotopic b-wave. Thus the A17 feedback, activated by light stimulation and mediated mainly by the GABAc receptors, makes the scotopic b-wave more transient by accelerating preferentially its decay. The strength of the feedback can be modulated by GABAa receptor-mediated inhibition and by light intensity. Our results also suggest that in the mammalian retina the feedback may be a novel mechanism that contributes postphotoreceptorally to the termination of rod signals, especially those elicited by very dim light stimuli.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The retinas
of the majority of mammalian species contain rod and cone photoreceptor
systems that are responsible for night and day vision, respectively. In
the classic mammalian rod pathway, rod bipolar cells do not communicate
directly with retinal ganglion cells. Instead, they give their synaptic
output to two types of amacrine cells, glycinergic AII and GABAergic
A17 cells (Freed et al. 1987
; Kolb and
Famiglietti 1974
; Massey et al. 1992
;
Pourcho and Goebel 1985
; Raviola and Dacheux
1987
; Strettoi et al. 1990
). While AII cells are
mandatory interneurons in the throughput pathway that conveys scotopic
(rod-driven) information to retinal ganglion cells (Dacheux and
Raviola 1986
; Kolb and Famiglietti 1975
), A17 amacrine cells form a modulatory circuit by feeding the majority of
their synaptic output back onto rod bipolar cell axon terminals (Nelson and Kolb 1985
; Sandell et al.
1989
).
This A17 feedback, first characterized histologically in cat over 25 years ago (Kolb and Famiglietti 1974
), has been
demonstrated in other mammalian species (Chun et al.
1993
; Grunert and Martin 1991
; Hartveit
1999
; Raviola and Dacheux 1987
; Tsukamoto
et al. 2001
) and appears to be a common feature of the classic
rod pathway in the mammalian retina. The feedback has long been
speculated to modulate transmission of rod-driven responses because of
its critical location in the rod pathway (Nelson and Kolb
1985
). Recently, the feedback has been proposed to generate the
antagonistic surround of dark-adapted AII amacrine cells (Volgyi
et al. 2002
). It may also contribute to GABAergic inputs to rod
bipolar cell terminals that modify the response range of these cells
(Euler and Masland 2000
). However, direct evidence for
the role of A17 feedback in processing of scotopic information is still
largely lacking (for a recent review see Bloomfield and Dacheux
2001
). A major obstacle is that rod bipolar cells receive
inputs from various types of inhibitory amacrine cells (Grunert
and Martin 1991
; Kim et al. 1998
;
Strettoi et al. 1990
). This makes it difficult to
determine the exact role of GABAergic A17 feedback in scotopic
processing, particularly if these inhibitory inputs are from various
types of GABAergic amacrine cells.
Rod bipolar cell terminals express a variety of inhibitory
neurotransmitter receptors, including the GABAc
receptor (Fletcher et al. 1998
; Karschin and
Wassle 1990
; McCall et al. 2002
; Shields et al. 2000
). In the mammalian CNS, this
GABAc receptor is expressed predominantly in the
retina, particularly at rod bipolar cell axon terminals (Enz et
al. 1996
; McCall et al. 2002
; Shields et al. 2000
) where it has been shown to be postsynaptic to A17
amacrine cells (Fletcher and Wassle 1999
). The molecular
biology and biophysics of the GABAc receptor have
been well characterized over the last decade. Compared with the more
widely distributed GABAa receptor, the
GABAc subtype is more sensitive to GABA and shows
little or no desensitization to the sustained presence of GABA (for
recent reviews see Chebib and Johnston 1999
;
Lukasiewicz and Shields 1998
; Zhang et al.
2001
). The unusual cellular distribution and biophysical
properties of the GABAc receptor suggest a unique role for the receptor in scotopic signal transfer that remains to be elucidated.
We determined the function of the A17 feedback in temporal tuning of the rod-driven response in vivo in the rabbit by examining the effects of GABAergic agents and selective ablation of A17 cells on the kinetics of the ensemble light response of the rod bipolar cell (assessed with the scotopic electroretinogram b-wave, see DISCUSSION for details). Our results suggest that A17 feedback, mediated mainly by the GABAc receptor, exerts a profound influence on the temporal properties of the rod-driven postphotoreceptoral response by accelerating preferentially its decay. Our results also suggest that the feedback may be a novel mechanism that contributes postphotoreceptorally to the termination of rod signals in the mammalian retina.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adult pigmented (Dutch belted) rabbits were used in this study. Animals were placed in a holder following general anesthesia with ketamine (30 mg/kg/h) and xylazine (15 mg/kg/h). The pupil of the rabbit eyes were dilated with topical 1% tropicamide. Corneal electroretinographic (ERG) responses from both left and right eyes were recorded simultaneously using two Burian-Allen bipolar contact-lens electrodes (Hansen Ophthalmic Development Lab, Iowa City, IA). A subcutaneous needle electrode connected to the ground of the amplifier was placed on the back of the animal. Light stimulation (5-ms flashes) for both eyes was provided by two white LEDs (6,500oK color temperature). The intensity of the LED stimulators was calibrated using a photometer (International Light IL-1700). Near full-field stimulation was achieved by illuminating custom-made diffusing screens placed very close to the contact-lens electrodes. Stimulus intensity and duration were controlled by a Pentium PC. All animals were dark adapted for 40 min prior to recording. ERG signals were preamplified and band-pass filtered (0.1-1000 Hz) before being digitized at 4 kHz. To record slow ERG signals, such as those observed in the presence of GABAc antagonists, it is critical that the cutoff frequency of the high-pass filter be set to 0.1 Hz or lower. We found that a setting of 0.3 Hz or higher attenuated significantly the effects of the GABAc antagonist or other agents that caused a slowing of the response kinetics. The ERG responses were saved on a Pentium PC. Averaged responses from 10 to 100 stimulus repetitions were used for analysis. To avoid any adapting effect of the previous flash, the interflash intervals were 2 to 20 s depending on stimulus intensity.
All drugs were dissolved in PBS and sterile filtered. Drugs were administered by intravitreal injection of a 50-µl volume through a 30-gauge needle inserted at the pars plana region. Control injections of 50 or 100 µl of PBS had no effect on ERG responses. Drug effects were evaluated 80-100 min following injections. Control experiments showed that steady-state drug effects are reached by that time and maintained for several hours thereafter. Final vitreal concentrations, given in the text and figure captions, were estimated by assuming 1.2 ml vitreous volume and full equilibration.
Ablation of A17 cells was achieved by injections of 50 µl PBS that contained 50 µg 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (DHT), 1.25 µg GBR-12909, and 50 µg ascorbic acid on 2 successive days. ERG recording and optical imaging were conducted 5 wk after the second injection. For optical imaging of A17 cells in control and DHT-treated eyes, the same DHT cocktail (50 µl) was injected intravitreally. Eighty minutes after the injection the animals were killed and the eyes were removed. A round piece of retina (8 mm diam) was cut from immediately below the optic nerve head and flat-mounted in a plastic chamber filled with HEPES-buffered Ames medium. The retina was imaged at 25 sites in a 5 × 5 array with a 40× water immersion objective using an Olympus microscope (BX50WI) equipped with an epifluorescence unit. The images were taken with a Hamamatsu C4742-95 digital camera controlled by Image-Pro Plus software (V4.5).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blocking GABAc receptors prolongs preferentially the decay of the scotopic b-waves
We used the scotopic b-wave to examine in vivo the role of A17
feedback in temporal modulation of the ensemble activity of rod bipolar
cells. The b-wave is a light-elicited transretinal field potential
reflecting activity of postphotoreceptor neurons, especially
ON bipolar cells (including rod bipolar cells and cone ON bipolar cells, Massey et al. 1983
;
Masu et al. 1995
). It can be recorded noninvasively and
thus is a unique tool to study the function of retinal neural pathways
in vivo, especially when used in combination with selective
pharmacological agents. Under scotopic conditions, the b-wave is a
sensitive and reliable measure of the gross rod-driven
postphotoreceptoral response (RDR) (Dong et al. 1988
;
Xu et al. 2000
, see DISCUSSION for details).
We used four dim light flashes that stimulated only or predominantly
rod photoreceptors. They were 0.66, 1.37, 2.15, and 2.77 log units above an arbitrarily defined threshold intensity (0.016 Cd/m2, 5-ms flash) that, on average, elicited a
b-wave of 16.4 ± 3.6 µV (mean ± SE) in 10 dark-adapted
control eyes. To quantify the effect of A17 feedback, we determined the
half-width of the rising (T1/2R) and
decay (T1/2D) phases (see Fig.
1A) of the scotopic b-wave
from the right and left eyes of dark-adapted control animals. T1/2R and
T1/2D values measured from two eyes of
control animals at these four intensities were essentially identical
(Fig. 1, A and C). Therefore, in subsequent
experiments, one eye (chosen randomly) of an animal was used as a
control and injected intravitreally with vehicle while the other was
injected with various pharmacological agents. In the rod pathway,
GABAc receptors are expressed predominantly at
rod bipolar cell axon terminals (Euler and Wassle 1998
;
Shields et al. 2000
). It has been shown that A17
amacrine cells are at least presynaptic to some of these
GABAc receptors (Fletcher and Wassle
1999
). To investigate modulation of scotopic responses by A17
feedback, we first applied a specific GABAc
receptor antagonist, (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid
(TPMPA). TPMPA prolonged preferentially the decay phase of the scotopic b-waves (Fig. 1, B and D). Interestingly, this
effect was intensity dependent; that is, dimmer stimuli were associated
with a greater slowing of the response decay. The percent change for
the T1/2D ratio increased from
140 ± 7% of control (n = 4) with the brightest stimuli to 274 ± 46% with the dimmest flashes. Similar results were obtained with picrotoxin, which blocks the
Cl
channels associated with both
GABAa and GABAc receptors
(data not shown). These results suggest that the
GABAc input to rod bipolar cells from amacrine
cells, including A17 cells, normally makes the scotopic b-waves more
transient, especially those elicited by dim stimuli.
|
Blocking GABAa receptors accelerates the kinetics of the scotopic b-waves
In addition to a major excitatory synaptic input from rod bipolar
cells, A17 amacrine cells receive GABAa-mediated
inputs from other GABAergic amacrine cells as well (Grunert and
Hughes 1993
; Menger and Wassle 2000
). Also, rod
bipolar cell terminals express GABAa and glycine
receptors, in addition to GABAc receptors (Karschin and Wassle 1990
; Shields et al.
2000
; Suzuki et al. 1990). To gain some insights
into how activity of A17 cells is regulated by other inhibitory
pathways and how GABAa and/or glycine receptors
contribute to temporal modulation of the scotopic b-waves, we applied
selective GABAa (SR95531) and glycine
(strychnine) receptor antagonists, either alone or in combination.
Application of the glycine antagonist had no significant effect
(data not shown). But surprisingly, injection of the
GABAa antagonist was associated with an
acceleration of the scotopic b-wave (Fig.
2). Both rising and decay phases were
affected. The effect of a combination of SR95531 and strychnine was
similar to that of SR95531 alone (data not shown), suggesting that
inhibition mediated by the strychnine-sensitive glycine receptor does
not contribute significantly to the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave.
The acceleration of the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave following
application of SR95531 is somewhat surprising, since application of a
GABAc antagonist (TPMPA) slowed the kinetics (Fig. 1, B and D). If the effect of TPMPA is
produced by blocking GABAc receptors at rod
bipolar cell terminals, the effect of SR95531 (Fig. 2) is most likely
caused by blocking GABAa receptors at a different
location since both GABAa and
GABAc receptors are coupled to a
Cl
channel and it is very unlikely that
blocking selectively these two types of ionotropic receptors on rod
bipolar cell terminals produces opposite effects on the kinetics of the
scotopic b-wave. One mechanism that could account, at least partially,
for the observed effect of SR95531 is that it causes an enhancement of the GABAc feedback from A17 cells by eliminating
GABAa inhibition onto A17 cells.
|
Coapplication of GABAc antagonist eliminates GABAa antagonist-induced acceleration of b-wave kinetics
To test whether an enhancement of GABAc
feedback is responsible for the GABAa
antagonist-induced acceleration of the kinetics (Fig. 2), we coapplied
TPMPA in combination with SR95531 (TPMPA + SR). In the presence of
TPMPA, the SR95531-induced kinetics acceleration was completely
eliminated (Fig. 3). The effect of the
combination was similar to that of TPMPA alone (Fig. 1D). Similar results were also observed with picrotoxin (data not shown), which blocks both GABAa and
GABAc receptor-coupled chloride channels in the
rabbit (McGillem et al. 2000
) and thus is functionally equivalent to the combination of TPMPA and SR95531. Taken together, these data suggest that the SR95531-induced kinetics acceleration results from an enhanced GABAc feedback
inhibition. Thus, under physiological conditions, the strength of the
GABAc feedback in the rod pathway can be
modulated not only by light intensity (Fig. 1, B and
D) but by GABAa inhibition as well.
|
Coapplication of GABAc and GABAa antagonists unmasks a second effect of the GABAa receptor on the kinetics
Application of a combination of TPMPA and SR95531 unmasked a
second role of the GABAa receptor in temporal
tuning of the scotopic b-wave. The difference caused by addition of
TPMPA was rather striking: blocking the GABAa
receptor with SR95531 now induced a significant slowing
(Fig. 3, A and B), rather than acceleration (Figs. 2 and 3C), of the rising phase of those responses
elicited by very dim flashes. This was a very consistent finding in all four animals treated with TPMPA in combination with SR95531. This kinetics slowdown is probably caused by blocking direct
GABAa inputs to rod bipolar cells, since
blocking the GABAc gated
Cl
conductance on rod bipolar cells also causes
a slowing of the scotopic b-wave (albeit affecting the decay rather
than rising phase of the response). Our results suggest that at least
two GABAa pathways affect the kinetics: an
indirect pathway that normally slows the kinetics through
inhibition of GABAc feedback, and a probably
direct pathway that normally accelerates the kinetics by
acting on rod bipolar cells themselves (see DISCUSSION for more details).
Ablation of A17 cells mimics the effect of GABAc antagonism on the kinetics
Immunocytochemical studies (Enz et al. 1996
;
Shields et al. 2000
) show a low-level expression of the
subunit at rod bipolar cell dendrites in addition to a strong
expression of the subunit at their terminals. To test whether the
observed effect of TPMPA on the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave is
produced by blocking the GABAc receptors
expressed at the rod bipolar cell terminals and whether the
GABAc-mediated temporal modulation is indeed
associated with A17 amacrine cells, we ablated the A17 cells and
examined the effect on the scotopic b-wave. In the rabbit, A17-like
amacrine cells selectively take up serotonin and can be further divided into two main subtypes (S1 and S2 cells) that show similar morphology and synaptic connectivity (Sandell and Masland 1986
;
Vaney 1986
), but different coupling patterns (Li
et al. 2002
). The functional difference between these two
subtypes is unknown. S1 and S2 cells can be selectively labeled and
ablated by serotonin analogs, such as DHT (Ehinger and Floren
1978
; Sandell and Masland 1986
; Vaney 1986
). In one group of rabbits (n = 7), we
ablated A17 cells with DHT. We recorded the scotopic b-wave at 5 wk
following the second DHT injection (see MATERIALS AND
METHODS). Figure 4 shows that the
effect of the DHT treatment on the scotopic b-wave was remarkably similar to that produced by TPMPA (Fig. 1): it prolonged preferentially the decay of the response and this effect was also intensity dependent. Again, dimmer stimuli were associated with a greater slowing of the
response decay.
|
Ineffectiveness of the GABAc antagonist in prolonging the decay phase of the scotopic b-wave after ablation of A17 cells
If the observed temporal modulation of the scotopic b-wave by TPMPA (Fig. 1) is mediated mainly by the GABAc receptors expressed at rod bipolar cell terminals and this modulation is associated with A17 cells, as suggested by the results of Fig. 4, TPMPA should not be very effective in the DHT-treated eyes. Indeed, in the DHT-treated eyes (n = 4), TPMPA was no longer very effective in slowing the decay of the scotopic b-wave: only a small effect was observed at the lowest stimulus intensity (Fig. 5A, blue column). Optical imaging experiments confirmed ablation of A17 cells at 5 wk following the DHT treatment. In control eyes, the total number of DHT-labeled cells in all 25 fields imaged (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) was 663 ± 36 (n = 7). In the DHT-treated eyes there were no labeled cells in four of seven eyes. In the remaining three eyes a few labeled cells were seen in some fields while no cells were detected in the majority of fields. Representative fields from control and DHT-treated eyes are shown in Fig. 5B. Taken together, our results indicate that the observed temporal modulation of the scotopic b-wave is produced predominantly by A17 cells via GABAc receptors on rod bipolar cell axon terminals and that contribution from the dendritic GABAc receptors, if any, is negligible.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings provide strong evidence that A17 feedback in the
classic rod pathway has a profound influence on the temporal properties
of the rod-driven response. Selective ablation of A17 cells produced a
marked slowing of the kinetics of the scotopic b-waves, especially
those elicited by very dim flashes (Fig. 4). This indicates that at
least one physiological role of this feedback mechanism is to make the
visual response more transient, similar to the role of the
GABAc feedback in the lower vertebrate retinas (Dong and Werblin 1998
; Zhang et al.
1997
) in which bipolar cells receive mixed rod and cone inputs.
A17 cell ablation affected preferentially the decay of the scotopic
b-wave (Fig. 4), suggesting that the tonic activity of the A17 feedback
pathway is low in the dark and that light stimulation activates the
feedback that in turn accelerates the decay of the rod-driven response.
The scotopic b-wave as a good indicator of the ensemble activity of rod bipolar cells
We used the ERG b-wave to examine in vivo the role of A17 feedback
in temporal modulation of the rod-driven response. Under scotopic
conditions, the b-wave provides a sensitive and reliable measure of the
rod-driven postphotoreceptoral response (Dong et al.
1988
; Xu et al. 2000
). The b-wave is generated
by activity of postphotoreceptoral neurons, particularly ON
bipolar cells (including both rod bipolar cells and ON cone
bipolar cells), since functional disruption of these cells, produced
either pharmacologically with a mGluR6 agonist (Knapp and
Schiller 1984
; Massey et al. 1983
;
Slaughter and Miller 1981
) or genetically by knocking
out mGluR6 (Masu et al. 1995
), eliminates the b-wave.
Rod bipolar cells are ON bipolar cells and are the major
source for generation of the scotopic b-wave (Green and
Kapousta-Bruneau 1999
; Robson and Frishman
1996
). Also, since all rod bipolar cells share the same pattern
of synaptic connectivity and are functionally homogeneous (Grunert and Martin 1991
; Strettoi et al.
1990
), the scotopic b-wave complements other recording
techniques, such as intracellular and whole-cell recordings, to provide
a unique tool for assessing the ensemble activity
of rod bipolar cells in vivo. The A17 cell ablation experiments (Fig.
4) provide further direct evidence that synaptic inputs, such as the
feedback inhibition from A17 amacrine cells, expected to influence rod
bipolar cells activity (Euler and Masland 2000
) do
affect the scotopic b-wave.
A17 feedback is mediated mainly by the GABAc receptor
We show that the effect of ablation of A17 cells on the kinetics
of the scotopic b-wave (Fig. 2) was very similar to that of the
GABAc antagonist TPMPA (Fig. 1) and that TPMPA
was not very effective in the DHT-treated eyes (Fig. 5). This indicates that A17 feedback is mediated mainly by the GABAc
receptor expressed on rod bipolar cell axon terminals. Since A17 cells
do not make synapses onto rod bipolar cell dendrites (Nelson and
Kolb 1985
; Sandell et al. 1989
), our results
also suggest that contribution from the dendritic
GABAc receptor (its presence is suggested mainly by a weak staining for the
1 subunit, see Enz et al.
1996
; Shields et al. 2000
) to the kinetics, if
any, is insignificant. This conclusion is consistent with previous
electrophysiological results that showed that dendritic GABA responses
in bipolar cells are mediated predominantly by
GABAa receptors (Du and Yang 2000
;
Shields et al. 2000
; Vaquero and de la Villa
1999
).
Rod bipolar cell terminals express both GABAa and
GABAc receptors, but the
GABAc receptor appears to be the dominant subtype (Euler and Wassle 1998
; McCall et al.
2002
; McGillem et al. 2000
; Shields et
al. 2000
). The great similarity between the effects of TPMPA
and ablation of A17 cells on the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave (Figs.
1, 4, and 5) indicates that contribution of the GABAa receptor on rod bipolar cell terminals to
A17 feedback is insignificant. Furthermore, the effect of a combination
of the GABAa and GABAc
antagonists on the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave elicited by very dim
flashes (Fig. 3) was rather different from that produced by ablation of
A17 cells (Fig. 4). Blocking the GABAa receptor
in the presence of TPMPA slowed significantly the rising phase of the
scotopic b-wave elicited by very dim flashes in all four eyes tested.
This slowing in the rising phase was never observed in the A17
cell-ablated eyes (n = 7). This raises the possibility
that these GABAa receptors expressed on rod
bipolar cell axon terminals may mediate inputs predominantly from
GABAergic amacrine cells other than A17 cells. If these
GABAa receptors were also postsynaptic to A17
cells, a similar slowing in the rising phase of the scotopic b-wave
seen in Fig. 3 should be observed after ablation of A17 cells.
Alternatively, the slowing of the rising phase of the scotopic b-wave
by the GABAa antagonist (Fig. 3) may be produced
by the GABAa receptors on the dendrites of rod
bipolar cells (and/or on some other sites in the rod pathway) since the
GABAa receptors are widely distributed and our
results do not suggest to us a particular localization.
Immunocytochemical studies (Fletcher and Wassle 1999
)
have provided compelling evidence that A17 cells are presynaptic to
GABAc receptors on rod bipolar cell terminals.
However, whether A17 cells are also presynaptic to
GABAa receptors on rod bipolar cell terminals is
less clear. More work is needed to clarify this important issue of
receptor specificity.
Using TPMPA as a GABAc receptor antagonist
We used TPMPA as a GABAc receptor
antagonist. In the mammalian retina, the effectiveness of TPMPA as a
GABAc receptor antagonist has been well
documented (McCall et al. 2002
; McGillem et al. 2000
). TPMPA is also a weak GABAb
receptor agonist (Ragozzino et al. 1996
). This does not,
however, affect our conclusion that A17 feedback modulates temporal
properties of rod-driven responses mainly through the
GABAc receptor for two reasons: first, rod bipolar cells, the postsynaptic neurons of A17 cells, do not
express GABAb receptors (Gillette and
Dacheux 1995
; Karschin and Wassle 1990
;
Yeh et al. 1990
). The great similarity between effects
of TPMPA and A17 cell ablation on the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave indicates that the observed TPMPA effects are produced by its GABAc blocking action. Second, the effects of
TPMPA on the kinetics were similar to those produced by picrotoxin
(data not shown), a ligand-gated Cl
channel
blocker that blocks both GABAc and
GABAa currents in the rabbit retina
(McGillem et al. 2000
).
Multiple GABAa pathways modulate the kinetics
Our results suggest that there are at least two separate
GABAa pathways that are involved in temporal
modulation of scotopic responses. One works indirectly and
normally slows the kinetics of the scotopic b-wave by
inhibiting the GABAc feedback. Blocking this
GABAa pathway led to an acceleration of the
kinetics through disinhibiting the GABAc feedback
(Figs. 2 and 3). A second GABAa pathway should
normally accelerate the kinetics since blocking the pathway
slowed down the kinetics (Fig. 3). We speculate that this second
pathway acts directly through GABAa receptors on
rod bipolar cell terminals for two reasons. First, blocking this
pathway slowed the kinetics similar to blocking the
GABAc feedback. This is consistent with the fact
that both the GABAa and
GABAc receptors are associated with a
Cl
channel and activation of these receptors is
expected to generate similar effects. Second, the
GABAa mechanism acted more rapidly and affected
mainly the rising phase of the scotopic b-wave while the
GABAc mechanism acted more slowly and affected
the decay phase of the response. This is consistent with the results of
previous patch-clamping studies on retinal bipolar cells, which showed that GABAa current has a faster kinetics than
GABAc current (Lukasiewicz and Shields
1998
; Shields et al. 2000
). However, we cannot
rule out the possibility that the GABAa-induced
kinetics acceleration is produced at sites other than rod bipolar cell terminals.
Comparison of results from the rabbit and the
1 knockout mouse
Our results show that selective ablation of A17 cells or acute
block of GABAc receptors slowed the kinetics of
the scotopic b-wave in adult rabbits. This is somewhat different from
the results obtained from the
1 knockout mouse in which the rising
phase of the scotopic b-wave is slightly accelerated (Fig. 6 of
McCall et al. 2002
). While we do not know the precise
reasons for the discrepancy, differences in experimental conditions
seem to be a contributing factor. We blocked acutely the
GABAc receptor in adult rabbits. This is
different from disabling the receptor using the knockout approach, in
which developmental changes and/or remodeling of other inhibitory
transmitter systems may occur. For example, in the
1 knockout mouse,
GABAa inhibition to rod bipolar cells is enhanced
by a few hundred percent to approximately 60 pA compared with 10 pA in
the wild-type (see Fig. 5, A and B of
McCall et al. 2002
). This would compensate at least
partially for the loss of GABAc inhibition at rod
bipolar cell terminals since both the GABAa and
GABAc receptors are coupled with a
Cl
channel. Our results (Fig. 3) show that
blocking GABAa receptors in the presence of the
GABAc antagonist caused a slowing of the kinetics, particularly the rising phase. This suggests that the normal
role of this GABAa pathway (not the indirect
GABAa pathway that acts by inhibiting the
GABAc feedback) is to accelerate the kinetics. It
is likely therefore that an enhancement of GABAa inhibition to rod bipolar cells in the absence of functional
GABAc receptors could cause kinetics acceleration
in the
1 knockout mouse. Other factors, such as species difference
and differences in settings of the high-pass filter for the recording
of the b-wave (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), are also likely
to contribute to the discrepancy. Examination of the kinetics of the
scotopic b-wave after blocking acutely the GABAc
receptor in the adult wild-type mouse may help to determine whether the
role of the GABAc feedback in temporal tuning of
scotopic responses in the mouse is fundamentally different from that in
the rabbit.
A17 feedback may be a novel postphotoreceptoral mechanism that contributes to termination of rod signals
In both TPMPA-treated and A17 cell-ablated rabbits, the degree of
prolongation of the decay of the scotopic b-wave increased as the
intensity of light stimulus decreased. This suggests that the strength
of A17 feedback increases as the stimulus intensity decreases and that,
under the physiological conditions, the feedback plays a substantial
role in accelerating the decay of rod-driven responses after light
flash. In the rod pathway, elements in the phototransduction cascade of
rod photoreceptors, such as rhodopsin kinase and arrestin, play a
critical role in termination of rod signals (Kuhn and Wilden
1987
; Stryer 1986
). The marked prolongation of
the decay of the scotopic response after the A17 feedback was blocked
(Fig. 1) or eliminated (Fig. 4), suggests that this feedback represents
a novel postphotoreceptoral mechanism that contributes to termination
of rod signals, especially those elicited by very dim stimuli.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. John McReynolds for helpful comments on the manuscript and P. Agey for excellent assistance in imaging experiments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: C.-J. Dong, Department of Biological Sciences, RD-2C, Allergan, Inc., 2525 Dupont Drive, Irvine, CA 92612 (E-mail: Dong_James{at}Allergan.com).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunits in the mammalian retina.
J Neurosci
16:
4479-4490, 1996
1 subunit abolishes GABAc receptor expression and alters visual processing in the mouse retina.
J Neurosci
22:
4163-4174, 2002This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. K. Mojumder, Y. Qian, and T. G. Wensel Two R7 Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Proteins Shape Retinal Bipolar Cell Signaling J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7753 - 7765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Chavez and J. S. Diamond Diverse Mechanisms Underlie Glycinergic Feedback Transmission onto Rod Bipolar Cells in Rat Retina J. Neurosci., July 30, 2008; 28(31): 7919 - 7928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |