| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Submitted 10 February 2003; accepted in final form 21 March 2003
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
;
Ralph et al. 1990). Many
organisms are also entrained by temperature cycles which generally fail to or
weakly affect mammalian circadian rhythms (reviewed in
Rensing and Ruoff 2002).
The mammalian SCN may, however, entrain directly to changes in
temperature. For example, the SCN shifts its rhythmicity in vitro following
temperature pulses (Ruby et al.
1999) and is normally exposed to daily fluctuations in brain
temperature (cf. Gao et al.
1995). To date, there has been no demonstration that the SCN
explant can be entrained in vitro.
The SCN may also entrain directly to light. In nonmammalian vertebrates,
circadian photoreceptors have been localized to a variety of neural and
nonneural tissues (Foster et al.
1994; Whitmore et al.
2000). In mammals, at least two gene products highly expressed in
the retina and SCN have been implicated in photoreception
(Miyamoto and Sancar 1998;
Van Gelder et al. 2003).
Finally, a report that popliteal illumination shifts human circadian rhythms
(Campbell and Murphy 1998) has
prompted a reexamination of the potential for extraocular photoreception in
mammals (Wright and Czeisler
2002; Yamazaki et al.
1999). These observations led us to ask whether the isolated SCN
can entrain to temperature or light cycles.
Perhaps the least understood characteristic of all circadian pacemakers is
their ability to keep accurate time over a range of temperatures. Temperature
has little effect on the period of circadian rhythms in poikilotherms
(Kondo et al. 1993;
Menaker and Wisner 1983;
Pittendrigh 1981;
Underwood 1985) and
heterotherms (Grahn et al.
1994; Menaker
1959). Temperature compensation of circadian period in
homeotherms has been demonstrated in vitro for the avian pineal
(Barrett and Takahashi 1995;
Zatz et al. 1994), the
mammalian retina (Tosini and Menaker
1998), and the rat SCN (Ruby
et al. 1999). It is unclear whether the mechanism is cell
autonomous or depends on cell-cell interactions.
Current models hold that 24-h rhythms are sustained by an intracellular
feedback loop of clock proteins on transcription of their own genes
(Brown and Schibler 2001;
Reppert and Weaver 2002), but
do not address temperature entrainment or compensation. The Period1
gene (Per1) may play a role in regulating circadian rhythmicity
(Bae et al. 2001;
Zheng et al. 2001). Using a
transgenic reporter of Per1 transcription and multisite electrical
recording, we sought to determine whether the isolated SCN entrains to
temperature or light cycles and whether temperature compensation of these
rhythms is a property of individual neurons.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
We assessed the effects of light or temperature cycles on intrinsic
rhythmicity in the SCN. Tissue for the entrainment experiments was harvested
from transgenic rats (Japanese Wistar) expressing 6.7 kb of the mouse
Per1 promoter driving the firefly luciferase gene. Details on the
generation of the Per1-luc rats have been previously published
(Yamazaki et al. 2000). Tissue
for the temperature compensation experiments was harvested from mice (C57BL/6J
x BALB/cJ inter-cross background). Animals were maintained at Washington
University under a 12:12 h light:dark schedule. All procedures were approved
by the University's Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to National
Institutes of Health guidelines.
Multielectrode recording
Dispersed cell cultures were prepared from neonatal mice (0- to
5-days-old). Pups were decapitated without anesthesia. Coronal sections of the
brain, 300-µm-thick, were made using a vibroslicer. Cylindrical punches
(410-µm-diameter) of unilateral SCN from five to eight pups were pooled,
dispersed, and grown according to published methods
(Herzog et al. 1998). Viable
cells were plated at approximately 2,000 cells/mm2 onto a
multimicroelectrode plate (Dr. Guenter Gross, Univ. North Texas, Denton, TX)
and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2-95% air for 2–3 wk.
Culture medium (pH 7.2) consisted of DMEM (Invitrogen No. 31053-028,
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen No. 17504-010),
100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, No. 15140-122),
and 10% neonatal calf serum (Invitrogen No. 16010-159). After about 2–3
wk in vitro, cultures were transferred to a recording chamber with 1 ml of
recording medium. Recording medium was identical to culture medium except that
it was supplemented with 10 mM HEPES and NaHCO3 levels were reduced
from 1.2 to 0.3 g/l. Half of the medium was exchanged about every 2.5 days. We
simultaneously recorded extracellular voltage signals from two cultures for
5 days. Signals from up to eight electrodes were simultaneously amplified
with an overall gain of 10,000–20,000 and band-pass filtered at
300–3,000 Hz (Cyberamp 380 and 401, Axon Instruments, Union City, CA).
The signals were displayed on oscilloscopes and digitized (12-bit resolution,
15-kHz minimum sample rate) on an IBM 586-type personal computer using custom
software. Every 10 min, the number of spikes with identical amplitude and
duration was totaled and stored. Using off-line analysis methods similar to
published methods (Meister et al.
1994), we assigned action potentials of similar amplitude and
duration to individual cells and counted impulse frequency. The shape of the
impulse and presence of a clear refractory period following the impulse were
used as criteria for single-unit activity.
Two separate systems were used to control the culture temperature. In both systems, the chamber lid was heated by a constant current flowing through a power resistor. This prevented condensation on the lid. Cultures were also heated from below either by a pair of power resistors heated by a temperature controller (model TC202A, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) or by water circulating through the recording stage (model E200, Lauda, Westbury, CT). Temperature inside the recording chamber was recorded with a thermocouple (PT-6 with Thermes-16, Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ). All temperature sensors were calibrated against a NIST-calibrated thermometer (Fisher Scientific No. 15043A). Long-term recordings showed that the temperature of the culture medium did not fluctuate with time of day and ranged by <0.25°C from the set point.
Real-time Per1-luc measurement
Explant cultures from neonatal (1–8 days after birth) and juvenile
rats (19–39 days old) were made from Per1-luc rats
approximately 1 h before dusk. Juvenile rats were anesthetized with
CO2 and decapitated and their brains were rapidly removed. Pups
<8 days of age were rapidly decapitated without anesthesia. Coronal
sections of the brain, 400-µm-thick, were made with a vibratome. Bilateral
or unilateral SCN explants were placed on Millicell membranes (PICM0RG50,
Fisher Scientific) with 1 ml of recording medium supplemented with 0.1 mM of
beetle luciferin (No. E1601, Promega, Madison, WI). These cultures were sealed
in a 35-mm petri dish with a coverslip and vacuum grease. Bioluminescence was
recorded within 2 h after surgery at 1-min intervals with a photomultiplier
tube (HC135–11MOD, Hamamatsu) as previously described
(Geusz et al. 1997).
Per1-luc cultures were maintained and recorded in large, air-jacketed incubators (6.67 cubic ft, model 1535, VWR, West Chester, PA). Temperature ranged by <0.3°C from the set point without circadian variation. Temperature cycles were imposed by changing the incubator set point. Culture temperature changed at a rate of 2.5°C per hour so that a 3°C shift was complete within 1.2 h and a 1°C shift was complete within 0.4 h.
Cultures exposed to light cycles were maintained in black boxes with black felt lids. Exposing the culture to light by removing the felt from a box had no effect on the temperature inside the box (data not shown). A single, 8 W fluorescent bulb (s928, Sylvania) covered with a diffuser produced 2.6–6.1 x 1014 photons·cm–2·s (approximately 150 lx) at the level of the cultures and was attenuated 1,550-fold by the black felt. The majority of emitted light (88%) was between 500 and 700 nm with peaks typical of a mercury lamp at 547 and 578 nm. Approximately 7% of the total emission was between 300–450 nm, with smaller peaks at 404 and 436 nm. Light intensity was calibrated using a radiometer (Li185b, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) and sensor (Li190SB Quantum). The 6-h advance in the light schedule was accomplished by advancing the time of lights-on, leading to one short, 6-h night. The 6-h delay was accomplished by delaying the time of lights-off, resulting in one long, 18-h day.
Data analysis
The phase of the bioluminescence rhythms was determined as previously
reported (Abe et al. 2002).
Briefly, a 24-h running average was subtracted from the raw data to reduce
changes in the baseline that occur over subsequent days.
Figure 1A shows
representative raw data and Figs.
2A,
3A, and
5, A and B,
show representative detrended data. Then a 3- and a 24-h running average were
calculated from the detrended data set. The phase of peak bioluminescence
between the crossings of these two smoothed lines was used as the phase marker
for each cycle of the recorded rhythms. All times were reported in
"Zeitgeber Time" (ZT) relative to animal's prior light cycle such
that ZT0 was the time of light onset in the animal colony (7 AM)
and ZT12 was the time of light offset (7 PM).
|
|
|
|
Cultures were defined as "entrained" when the phase of their
first peak following an entraining cycle was more than one SD unit from the
control condition, within one SD unit of the other cultures within the
treatment, and the phase of subsequent cycles showed a stable free-running
period for at least three more days. Period of Per1-luc cultures was
determined as the average time between bioluminescence peaks over at least 4
days. Phase and period differences were analyzed by two-tailed Student's
t-test using Origin6.1 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). Free-running
periods of firing rate records from individual cells were quantitatively
assessed from at least 3 days of data by a fast Fourier transform nonlinear
least-squares method (FFT-NLLS; Herzog et
al. 1997). On completion, FFT-NLLS provided period estimates with
95% confidence limits. The temperature coefficient was calculated by using the
equation Q10 =
(
1/2)[10/(T2–T1)],
where is the cell's period and T is temperature.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
To address whether physiological fluctuations in temperature can alter SCN
pacemaking, we exposed rat SCN explants to eight 1.5°C cycles roughly in
anti-phase to the normal rhythm in brain temperature (cf.
Gao et al. 1995). SCN cultures
synchronized their rhythmicity to these cycles
(Fig. 1A). Over the
first 3–5 days, the rhythm in Per1-luc expression gradually
advanced until the peak occurred approximately 0.5 h after the cool-to-warm
transition (Fig. 1B).
This phase relationship was stable and seen in all cultures (n = 6 of
6 entrained). Compared with Per1-luc rhythmicity in the SCN in vivo
(Yamaguchi et al. 2001) and on
the first day in vitro (Abe et al.
2002; Stokkan et al.
2001; Yamazaki et al.
2000), the temperature cycle advanced these cultures by
9.5–11 h.
When the temperature was then held at 36.8°C for an additional 5 days, rhythms free-ran from the entrained phase with an average period of 24.8 ± 0.4 h. Control cultures maintained at 36.8°C for 10 days showed no signs of entrainment and had a period of 25.2 ± 0.2 h (mean ± SE). The phase difference between the control and treated cultures was significant after the first temperature cycle (t = 5.8, P < 0.000001). These data indicate that the SCN can entrain to physiological temperature oscillations.
This synchronization was independent of age. Cultures from 1- and
19-day-old (P1 and P19) rats showed similar phase relationships to the
temperature cycle (peaking at ZT 0.7 ± 0.3 and 0.3 ± 0.5,
respectively, n = 3 in each condition; t = –0.67,
P = 0.54). The initial peak, prior to temperature cycling, of the P19
SCN was at ZT 10.0 ± 0.2, as has been found in rats aged 30–40
days (Abe et al. 2002). The
free-running periods of the neonates and juveniles were similar (24.7 ±
0.9 and 25.3 ± 0.2 h, respectively). Thus entrainability to temperature
develops early in the ontogeny of the SCN.
Left and right SCN similarly entrained. No differences were found in their initial phases prior to temperature cycles (ZT 10.0 ± 0.4 for left and 10.2 ± 0.5 for right, t = 0.24, P = 0.81, n = 12 left and 13 right SCN) or their phases after temperature entrainment (ZT 0.7 ± 0.3 for 3 left SCN, 0.3 ± 0.5 for 3 right SCN, t = –0.55, P = 0.61).
Amplitude of the temperature cycle affects the phase of entrainment
The phase angle of entrainment, measured as the delay between the peak of
the biological rhythm and the peak of the entraining rhythm, is generally a
function of the strength of the environmental timing cue. Previous work showed
that 3°C pulses shift the firing rate rhythm in the SCN by 
3 h
(Ruby et al. 1999). To test
whether this stimulus could entrain the SCN to a different phase compared with
a 1.5°C cycle, we exposed unilateral SCN to three 12:12 h cycles of
34:37°C. Daily temperature rose approximately 3 h earlier than the brain's
natural oscillation. Rhythms in the treated SCN peaked approximately 0.5 h
before the cool-to-warm transition and were approximately two to four times
the amplitude of untreated cultures (Fig.
2A). Relative to control cultures, treated SCN were
advanced by an average of 1.3 h during the temperature cycles and 3.4 h on the
first cycle of the free-run (n = 3 of 10 entrained vs. 8 controls).
The free-running rhythms peaked at a phase approximately 1–2 h earlier
than they had during the temperature cycles. This "masking" effect
on our ability to assess the true phase of the intrinsic oscillator in
temperature cycles was similar in 1.5 and 3°C cycles (see also
Fig. 1B, where the
initial peak in the free-run was advanced relative to peak phase in the prior
temperature cycle). Those cultures that failed to entrain all showed
"transient entrainment," where their first peak in constant
conditions appeared as if entrained, but subsequent cycles jumped back to the
phase of untreated controls. Importantly, relative to the time of daily
warming, entrained cultures in the 3°C cycle peaked approximately 2 h
prior to cultures in 1.5°C cycles (compare Fig.
1B and
2B). Thus the phase
angle of entrainment of SCN rhythmicity depended on the amplitude of the
temperature cycle.
To test whether a 1°C cycle is also sufficient to entrain, cultures were exposed to 2.5 cycles of 12:12 h 35.7:36.7°C cycle. Left and right SCN were dissected and randomly assigned to two groups. After 2 days at constant temperature, explants experienced a daily temperature increase at ZT 9 (n = 8) or 15 (n = 9). During the temperature cycles, the rhythms moved their daily maximum toward the transition from cool-to-warm (Fig. 3). However, despite experiencing schedules that were 6 h apart, cultures failed to significantly shift relative to each other (n = 0 of 17 entrained). This again suggests that temperature has acute effects on Per1-luc expression that can mask the true state of the underlying oscillator and that synchronization to a 3-h advance or delay requires temperature fluctuations larger than 1°C or more than 2.5 entraining cycles.
Circadian periodicity is temperature compensated in individual SCN neurons
Previous work showed that the timing of daily peaks in SCN firing rate
changes little over a range of physiological temperatures
(Ruby et al. 1999). Because
the mechanisms underlying this temperature compensation of period are unknown,
we sought to determine whether this property, ubiquitous among circadian
pacemakers, is intrinsic to individual cells. Because mice can exhibit large
changes in body temperature during torpor, we chose to record from mouse SCN
neurons from 24 to 37°C. SCN neurons plated at low density on
multielectrode arrays expressed circadian rhythms in firing rate over a range
of 13°C (Fig. 4A).
As previously reported, we found neurons in the same culture with different
circadian periods, indicating they were independently oscillating
(Herzog et al. 1998;
Honma et al. 1998;
Liu et al. 1997a;
Welsh et al. 1995). Firing
patterns were recorded from 9 neurons at multiple temperatures in five
cultures. The circadian period of most neurons increased slightly with warming
(n = 8 of 9 neurons; Fig.
4B). Individual cells had Q10 values
of 0.94 ± 0.04 (mean ± SE, range from 0.68 to 1.07). Including
neurons for which we were able to estimate the period at only one temperature
(n = 60 cells in 15 cultures), the average periods at 24, 30, 33, and
37°C were 23.6 ± 0.5, 22.1 ± 0.7, 23.8 ± 0.6, 23.6
± 0.4 h, respectively (Fig.
4C). The Q10 of the ensemble data
were 0.99 from 24 to 37°C, indicating that circadian period of single
neurons is temperature compensated.
|
The percentage of rhythmic neurons decreased with temperature (Table 1). Only 19% of the recorded cells expressed circadian rhythms in firing rate at 24°C, in contrast to 50% at 30°C, 28% at 33°C, and 68% at 37°C. Indeed, 10 of the 21 cells recorded at 24°C were arrhythmic at 24°C, but rhythmic at a warmer temperature (Fig. 4B). Although all cells had a daily decline in firing to near silence, their peak discharge rates were heterogeneous even at a given temperature (Fig. 4A) so that there was no significant effect of temperature on maximum (F = 1.36, P = 0.27) or median firing rates (F = 0.44, P = 0.72; Table 1). These results suggest that although the pacemaker can keep accurate time over the range of physiological temperatures, its ability to rhythmically regulate firing rate is compromised at lower temperatures.
|
Light cycles fail to directly entrain the cultured SCN
Previous reports suggested the possibility that the brain is directly light
sensitive (Blackshaw and Snyder
1999; Marchant and Morin
2001; Miyamoto and Sancar
1998; Wade et al.
1988) and at least one report specifically implicated the SCN
(Lisk and Kannwischer 1964).
To test whether the SCN is intrinsically light sensitive, we exposed SCN
cultures to a 6 h advanced or 6 h delayed light schedule. Left or right SCN
experienced lights on at either ZT 6 or 18 for 5 days and were then maintained
in constant darkness for an additional 5 days. We recorded bioluminescence
from the cultures immediately following the fifth dusk.
Figure 5 shows that light had
no effect on the phase of rhythmicity, with SCN in the advanced and delayed
treatments reaching their first peak in constant darkness at between 4.7 and
5.1 1 h after lights on in the animal colony (n = 5 SCN in each
condition; t = –0.25, P = 0.81). No effect of light
was noted in SCN from 2- or 31-day-old rats (n = 4 and 6,
respectively) in this experiment. Results from three further experiments on
rats at ages 6 (n = 5), 9 (n = 5), and 339 days (n
= 6) were similar (data not shown). Thus the SCN failed to directly entrain to
light cycles that would have entrained the animal.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
;
Sulzman et al. 1977).
Rhythmicity in the mammalian SCN was recently reported to be unaffected by
changes in environmental temperature (Brown
et al. 2002). However, we found that daily temperature
fluctuations of as little as 1.5°C reliably entrain the isolated SCN. This
suggests that, while physiological mechanisms buffer brain temperature against
environmental cycles, the normal rhythms in brain temperature are sufficient
to entrain the SCN in vivo.
The phase relationship between SCN and temperature rhythms is similar in
vivo and in vitro. Rats show a sharp increase in brain temperature of
1–2°C approximately 1 h prior to the onset of locomotor activity
(reviewed in Gao et al. 1995;
Refinetti and Menaker 1992).
In vivo, peak Per1-luc expression in the rat SCN occurs at
approximately ZT 10, 1 h prior to the increase in brain temperature
(Abe et al. 2002;
Yamazaki et al. 2000).
Per1 levels in mice are similarly regulated
(Wilsbacher et al. 2002;
Yamaguchi et al. 2001). When
exposed to 1.5°C temperature cycles in vitro, Per1-luc in the SCN
peaks approximately 1 h before the daily rise in temperature
(Fig. 1B). This phase
angle of entrainment is advanced in 3°C temperature cycles so that peak
bioluminescence occurs about 3 h prior to the daily rise in temperature
(Fig. 2B). It is
reasonable to postulate, therefore, that daily cycles in brain temperature
entrain the SCN, placing temperature on the output of and input to the SCN.
Such a feedback loop could serve to increase amplitude or cycle-to-cycle
stability and perhaps to communicate phase to peripheral oscillators. Indeed,
daily changes in body temperature have recently been shown to alter the
rhythmic expression of genes in the liver
(Brown et al. 2002).
Importantly, this same study found that environmental fluctuations from 24 to
37°C had no effect on the SCN, indicating that this deep brain structure
is well buffered against ambient heating and cooling.
Although daily warming can shift the phase of the SCN, long-term recordings
of firing rate revealed that the circadian period of individual SCN neurons is
temperature compensated (Fig.
4). As found for circadian rhythms in a wide variety of organisms
(Bunning 1973;
Pittendrigh 1954;
Ruby et al. 1999;
Sweeney and Hastings 1960),
the period changes by <10% with a 10°C change in temperature. In
contrast, most biochemical reaction rates typically double or triple over a
10°C range. We found SCN neurons cultured at low density express different
circadian periods from one another, as has been reported by others
(Welsh et al. 1995). As
temperatures increased, most neurons showed slightly longer periods, but
continued to express periods distinct from others in the same culture. Taken
together, these results indicate that each neuron is likely an independent,
temperature-compensated circadian oscillator.
The mechanisms underlying temperature compensation are unknown. Temperature
compensation is altered by mutations in genes that play a central role in
rhythm generation in mammals (Tosini and
Menaker 1998), fungi (Loros
and Feldman 1986), and flies
(Konopka et al. 1994). It may
be that temperature differentially regulates the abundance (or activity) of
different "clock gene products," having direct, compensatory
effects on transcriptional activators and repressors. Alternatively, a
mechanism outside the central core may act as a governor controlling pacemaker
rate. In either scenario, a pair of reactions might speed up with increasing
temperature with one reaction counteracting the effects of the other
(Hall 1997). It will be
important to follow up the observation that Per1-luc expression was
higher at lower temperatures with experiments that directly address the
effects of temperature on clock gene activity.
There are temperature limits to circadian rhythmicity. Daily hypothalamic
temperature in rats typically ranges between approximately 36.8 and 38.6°C
when ambient temperature is between 10 and 30°C
(Abrams and Hammel 1965;
Gao et al. 1995;
Gordon 1990). The results here
showed that, from 24 to 37°C, the period of the mouse SCN was
intrinsically temperature compensated, but the percentage of rhythmic neurons
decreased at temperatures below approximately 33°C. This is consistent
with the observation that, from 37 to 25°C, the amplitude of ensemble
firing in the rat SCN decreased by approximately 70% after 1 day and
rhythmicity was lost after 3 days in vitro
(Ruby and Heller 1996). Also,
consistent with previous reports (Burgoon
and Boulant 1998), we found that SCN neurons either showed
decreased or unchanged firing as they cooled. SCN neurons, however, are
heterogeneous in their firing rates (e.g., peak firing rates in this study
ranged from 0.1 to 12.1 Hz across cells at 37°C). This variability may
explain why the tendency toward decreased firing at lower temperatures did not
reach significance (Table
1).
The effects of temperature on SCN function are also species specific (cf.
Ruby and Heller 1996). Brains
in organisms such as mice, bats, and ground squirrels can drop below 25°C
during bouts of torpor or hibernation and may still express circadian rhythms
in body temperature (Hut et al.
2002; Ruby et al.
2002). Recently, Larkin et al.
(2002) provided compelling
evidence that the circadian regulation of brain temperature continues, albeit
at much reduced amplitude, in the hibernating squirrel SCN at ambient
temperatures as low as 9°C. These animals, however, lost their circadian
rhythm in slow-wave sleep. The SCN of some hibernators may thus be adapted to
regulate selected rhythms at lower temperatures. In general, reducing brain
temperature below normal appears to suppress SCN regulation of rhythmic
outputs such as firing rate, perhaps by reducing the amplitude of the core
circadian oscillator.
In contrast to the direct effects of temperature on SCN timing, light
cycles failed to entrain SCN cultures (Fig.
5). Rodents can entrain to 6-h shifts in their light schedule
within 5 days (cf. Yamazaki et al.
2000) and to intensities above approximately 1011
photons·cm–2·s
(Nelson and Takahashi 1991).
In our hands, lights as bright as 6 x 1014
photons·cm–2·s cycling for 5 days
had no effect on SCN rhythmicity. This is in agreement with several studies
showing that the eyes are necessary for photic entrainment in mammals (cf.
Yamazaki et al. 1999). Genes
expressed in both the SCN and the retina, similar to Cryptochrome 1 and 2, may
play the same role in the two tissues (e.g., rhythm generation), but are
unlikely to be involved photoreception in the SCN.
Little is known about how temperature entrains the SCN. The phase response
curve to 3°C temperature pulses by Ruby et al.
(1999) predicted that the SCN
can shift a maximum of 3 h per day. Consistent with this, we found that the
SCN took 3 days to advance approximately 10 h in a 1.5°C temperature cycle
(Fig. 1B). It is
possible that temperature acts on a neurotransmitter system within the SCN to
synchronize cells to a new schedule. Liu and Reppert
(2000) showed that daily
pulses of GABA will synchronize individual SCN neurons in vitro so that the
GABA pulse falls during the cells' early subjective night, producing a daily
phase delay. Ruby et al.
(1999) found that heat pulses
at this time also delay SCN rhythmicity. This agrees with our finding that the
SCN entrained so that the daily rise in temperature occurred during the early
subjective night (approximately 1–2 h after the peak of
Per1-luc expression; Fig.
1B). However, the phase response curve to GABA included a
large delay zone during the subjective day
(Liu and Reppert, 2000) when
temperature appears to have little effect on SCN phase
(Ruby et al. 1999). Instead,
temperature steps may act directly on intracellular events to shift individual
cells. Temperature might, for example, modulate CLOCK-BMAL1 heterodimer
formation through changes in cellular metabolism and redox state
(Rutter et al. 2002). In the
fungus, Neurospora crassa, warming potently resets levels of
frequency (FRQ) protein which resets the clock
(Liu et al. 1998). Temperature
also regulates the threshold at which FRQ protein suppresses its own
transcription and the abundance of two forms of FRQ, by favoring different
initiation codons at different temperatures
(Liu et al. 1997b). How
temperature is transduced to the nucleus is largely unknown, but it is now
clear that one or more intracellular mechanisms enable the circadian clock to
keep accurate time over a range of temperatures and to synchronize to
temperature cycles.
The role of temperature in circadian entrainment may be highly conserved
across phyla and fundamental in mammals. Because light at night causes an
increase in brain temperature (Song and
Rusak 2000), the two stimuli may act synergistically to shift the
clock. Temperature entrainability develops early within the SCN, even before
rhythms in body temperature (Melanie et
al. 1986). It is therefore conceivable that maternal presence,
heavy exercise, fever, and treatments that alter brain temperature could
perturb normal circadian timekeeping
(Jilge et al. 2000;
Luker et al. 2000;
Satinoff 1972;
Satinoff et al. 1991). A
better understanding of how temperature resets the pacemaker will likely lead
to a better understanding of the mechanisms that generate and synchronize
circadian rhythmicity over the physiological range of temperatures
(Krishnan et al. 2001;
McWatters et al. 2000;
Merrow et al. 1999).
|
DISCLOSURES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests: E. Herzog, Box 1137, Dept. of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 (E-mail: Herzog{at}biology.wustl.edu).
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Abrams R and Hammel HT. Cyclic variations in hypothalamic temperature in unanesthetized rats. Am J Physiol 208: 698–702, 1965.
Bae K, Jin X, Maywood ES, Hastings MH, Reppert SM, and Weaver DR. Differential functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN circadian clock. Neuron 30: 525–536, 2001.
Barrett RK and Takahashi JS. Temperature compensation and temperature entrainment of the chick pineal cell circadian clock. J Neurosci 15: 5681–5692, 1995.
Blackshaw S and Snyder SH. Encephalopsin: a novel mammalian extraretinal opsin discretely localized in the brain. J Neurosci 19: 3681–3690, 1999.
Brown SA and Schibler U. Circadian rhythms: mop up the clock! Curr Biol 11: R268–R270, 2001.
Brown S, Zumbrunn G, Fleury-Olela F, Preitner N, and Schibler U. Rhythms of mammalian body temperature can sustain peripheral circadian clocks. Curr Biol 12: 1574, 2002.
Bunning E. The Physiological Clock: Circadian Rhythms and Biological Chronometry. London: English Universities Press, 1973.
Burgoon PW and Boulant JA. Synaptic inhibition: its role in suprachiasmatic nucleus neuronal thermosensitivity and temperature compensation in the rat. J Physiol 512: 793–807, 1998.
Campbell SS and Murphy PJ. Extraocular circadian phototransduction in humans. Science 279: 396–399, 1998.
DeCoursey PJ. Phase control of activity in a rodent. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 25: 49–55, 1960.
Foster RG, Grace MS, Provencio I, Degrip WJ, and Garcia-Fernandez JM. Identification of vertebrate deep brain photoreceptors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 18: 541–546, 1994.
Gao BO, Franken P, Tobler I, and Borbely AA. Effect of elevated ambient temperature on sleep, EEG spectra, and brain temperature in the rat. Am J Physiol 268: R1365–R1373, 1995.
Geusz ME, Fletcher C, Block GD, Straume M, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Kay SA, and Day RN. Long-term monitoring of circadian rhythms in c-fos gene expression from suprachiasmatic nucleus cultures. Curr Biol 7: 758–766, 1997.
Gordon CJ. Thermal biology of the laboratory rat. Physiol Behav 47: 963–991, 1990.
Grahn DA, Miller JD, Houng VS, and Heller JC. Persistence of circadian rhythmicity in hibernating ground squirrels. Am J Physiol 266: R1251–R1258, 1994.
Hall JC. Circadian pacemakers blowing hot and cold— but they're clocks, not thermometers. Cell 90: 9–12, 1997.
Herzog ED, Geusz ME, Khalsa SBS, Straume M, and Block GD. Circadian rhythms in mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus explants on multimicroelectrode plates. Brain Res 757: 285–290, 1997.
Herzog ED, Takahashi JS, and Block GD. Clock controls circadian period in isolated suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. Nat Neurosci 1: 708–713, 1998.
Honma S, Shirakawa T, Katsuno Y, Namihira M, and Honma K-I. Circadian periods of single suprachiasmatic neurons in rats. Neurosci Lett 250: 157–160, 1998.
Hut RA, Barnes BM, and Daan S. Body temperature patterns before, during, and after semi-natural hibernation in the European ground squirrel. J Comp Physiol [B] 172: 47–58, 2002.
Jilge B, Kuhnt B, Landerer W, and Rest S. Circadian thermoregulation in suckling rabbit pups. J Biol Rhythms 15: 329–335, 2000.
Klein DC, Moore RY, and Reppert SM. Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: The Mind's Clock. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991.
Kondo T, Strayer CA, Kulkarni RD, Taylor W, Ishiura M, Golden SS, and Johnson CH. Circadian rhythms in prokaryotes: luciferase as a reporter of circadian gene expression in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 5672–5676, 1993.
Konopka RJ, Hamblen-Coyle MJ, Jamison CF, and Hall JC. An ultrashort clock mutation at the period locus of Drosophila melanogaster that reveals some new features of the fly's circadian system. J Biol Rhythms 9: 189–216, 1994.
Krishnan B, Levine JD, Lynch MK, Dowse HB, Funes P, Hall JC, Hardin PE, and Dryer SE. A new role for cryptochrome in a Drosophila circadian oscillator. Nature 411: 313–317, 2001.
Larkin JE, Franken P, and Heller HC. Loss of circadian organization of sleep and wakefulness during hibernation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 282: R1086–R1095, 2002.
Lisk RD and Kannwischer LR. Light: evidence for its direct effect on hypothalamic neurons. Science 146: 272–273, 1964.
Liu C and Reppert SM. GABA synchronizes clock cells within the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Neuron 25: 123–128, 2000.
Liu C, Weaver DR, Strogatz SH, and Reppert SM. Cellular construction of a circadian clock: period determination in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Cell 91: 855–860, 1997a.
Liu Y, Garceau NY, Loros JJ, and Dunlap JC. Thermally regulated translational control of FRQ mediates aspects of temperature responses in the Neurospora circadian clock. Cell 89: 477–486, 1997b.
Liu Y, Merrow M, Loros JJ, and Dunlap JC. How temperature changes reset a circadian oscillator. Science 281: 825–829, 1998.
Loros JJ and Feldman JF. Loss of temperature compensation of circadian period length in the frq-9 mutant of Neurospora crassa. J Biol Rhythms 1: 187–198, 1986.
Luker FI, Mitchell D, and Laburn HP. Fever and motor activity in rats following day and night injections of Staphylococcus aureus cell walls. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279: R610–R616, 2000.
Marchant EG and Morin LP. Light augments FOS protein induction in brain of short-term enucleated hamsters. Brain Res 902: 51–65, 2001.
McWatters HG, Bastow RM, Hall A, and Millar AJ. The ELF3 zeitnehmer regulates light signalling to the circadian clock. Nature 408: 716–720, 2000.
Meister M, Pine J, and Baylor DA. Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis. J Neurosci Methods 51: 95–106, 1994.
Melanie E, Kittrell W, and Satinoff E. Development of the circadian rhythm of body temperature in rats. Physiol Behav 38: 99–104, 1986.
Menaker M. Endogenous rhythms of body temperature in hibernating bats. Nature 184: 1251–1252, 1959.
Menaker M and Wisner S. Temperature-compensated circadian clock in the pineal of Anolis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 6119–6121, 1983.
Merrow M, Brunner M, and Roenneberg T. Assignment of circadian function for the Neurospora clock gene frequency. Nature 399: 584–586, 1999.
Miyamoto Y and Sancar A. Vitamin B2-based blue-light photoreceptors in the retinohypothalamic tract as the photoactive pigments for setting the circadian clock in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 6097–6102, 1998.
Nelson DE and Takahashi JS. Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). J Physiol 439: 115–145, 1991.
Pittendrigh CS. On temperature independence in the clock-system controlling emergence in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 40: 1018–1029, 1954.
Pittendrigh CS. Circadian systems: entrainment. In: Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, edited by Aschoff, J., New York: Plenum Press, 1981, p. 95–124.
Ralph MR, Foster RG, Davis FC, and Menaker M. Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian period. Science 247: 975–978, 1990.
Refinetti R and Menaker M. The circadian rhythm of body temperature. Physiol Behav 51: 613–637, 1992.
Rensing L and Ruoff P. Temperature effect on entrainment, phase shifting, and amplitude of circadian clocks and its molecular bases. Chronobiol Int 19: 807–864, 2002.
Reppert SM and Weaver DR. Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418: 935–941, 2002.
Ruby NF, Burns DE, and Heller HC. Circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus are temperature-compensated and phase-shifted by heat pulses in vitro. J Neurosci 19: 8630–8636, 1999.
Ruby NF, Dark J, Burns DE, Heller HC, and Zucker I. The suprachiasmatic nucleus is essential for circadian body temperature rhythms in hibernating ground squirrels. J Neurosci 22: 357–364, 2002.
Ruby NF and Heller HC. Temperature sensitivity of the suprachiasmatic nucleus of ground squirrels and rats in vitro. J Biol Rhythms 11: 126–136, 1996.
Rutter J, Reick M, and McKnight SL. Metabolism and the control of circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 307–331, 2002.
Satinoff E. Salicylate: action on normal body temperature in rats. Science 176: 532–533, 1972.
Satinoff E, Kent S, and Hurd M. Elevated body temperature in female rats after exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 1250–1253, 1991.
Song X and Rusak B. Acute effects of light on body temperature and activity in Syrian hamsters: influence of circadian phase. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278: R1369–R1380, 2000.
Stokkan KA, Yamazaki S, Tei H, Sakaki Y, and Menaker M. Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feeding. Science 291: 490–493, 2001.
Sulzman FM, Fuller CA, and Moore-Ede MC. Environmental synchronizers of squirrel monkey circadian rhythms. J Appl Physiol 43: 795–800, 1977.
Sweeney BM and Hastings JW. Effect of temperature upon diurnal rhythms. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 25: 87–104, 1960.
Tosini G and Menaker M. The tau mutation affects temperature compensation of hamster retinal circadian oscillators. Neuroreport 9: 1001–1005, 1998.
Underwood H. Pineal melatonin rhythms in the lizard Anolis carolinensis: effects of light and temperature cycles. J Comp Physiol [A] 157: 57–65, 1985.
Van Gelder RN, Wee R, Lee JA, and Tu DC. Reduced pupillary light responses in mice lacking cryptochromes. Science 299: 222, 2003.
Wade PD, Taylor J, and Siekevitz P. Mammalian cerebral cortical tissue responds to low-intensity visible light. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 9322–9326, 1988.
Welsh DK, Logothetis DE, Meister M, and Reppert SM. Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms. Neuron 14: 697–706, 1995.
Whitmore D, Foulkes NS, and Sassone-Corsi P. Light acts directly on organs and cells in culture to set the vertebrate circadian clock. Nature 404: 87–91, 2000.
Wilsbacher LD, Yamazaki S, Herzog ED, Song EJ, Radcliffe LA, Abe M, Block GD, Spitznagel E, Menaker M, and Takahashi JS. Photic and circadian expression of luciferase in mPeriod1-luc transgenic mice in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 489–494, 2002.
Wright KP Jr and Czeisler CA. Absence of circadian phase resetting in response to bright light behind the knees. Science 297: 571, 2002.
Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi M, Mitsui S, Ishida Y, van der Horst GT, Suzuki M, Shibata S, and Okamura H. View of a mouse clock gene ticking. Nature 409: 684, 2001.
Yamazaki S, Goto M, and Menaker M. No evidence for extraocular photoreceptors in the circadian system of the Syrian hamster. J Biol Rhythms 14: 197–201, 1999.
Yamazaki S, Numano R, Abe M, Hida A, Takahashi R, Ueda M, Block GD, Sakaki Y, Menaker M, and Tei H. Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in transgenic rats. Science 288: 682–685, 2000.
Zatz M, Lange GD, and Rollag MD. What does changing the temperature do to the melatonin rhythm in cultured chick pineal cells? Am J Physiol 266: R50–R58, 1994.
Zheng B, Albrecht U, Kaasik K, Sage M, Lu W, Vaishnav S, Li Q, Sun ZS, Eichele G, Bradley A, and Lee CC. Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. Cell 105: 683–694, 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Kwak, G. B. Lundkvist, J. Brask, A. Davidson, M. Menaker, K. Kristensson, and G. D. Block Interferon-{gamma} Alters Electrical Activity and Clock Gene Expression in Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Neurons J Biol Rhythms, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 150 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Reyes, J. S. Pendergast, and S. Yamazaki Mammalian Peripheral Circadian Oscillators Are Temperature Compensated J Biol Rhythms, February 1, 2008; 23(1): 95 - 98. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Vanselow, J. T. Vanselow, P. O. Westermark, S. Reischl, B. Maier, T. Korte, A. Herrmann, H. Herzel, A. Schlosser, and A. Kramer Differential effects of PER2 phosphorylation: molecular basis for the human familial advanced sleep phase syndrome (FASPS) Genes & Dev., October 1, 2006; 20(19): 2660 - 2672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Zhou, C. Yuan, and A. Guo Drosophila Olfactory Response Rhythms Require Clock Genes but Not Pigment Dispersing Factor or Lateral Neurons J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2005; 20(3): 237 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Prolo, J. S. Takahashi, and E. D. Herzog Circadian Rhythm Generation and Entrainment in Astrocytes J. Neurosci., January 12, 2005; 25(2): 404 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Sancar Regulation of the Mammalian Circadian Clock by Cryptochrome J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34079 - 34082. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Aton, G. D. Block, H. Tei, S. Yamazaki, and E. D. Herzog Plasticity of Circadian Behavior and the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Following Exposure to Non-24-Hour Light Cycles J Biol Rhythms, June 1, 2004; 19(3): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
