JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 90: 1949-1955, 2003. First published April 30, 2003; doi:10.1152/jn.00175.2003
0022-3077/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/3/1949    most recent
00175.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bove, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leem, J.-G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bove, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leem, J.-G.

Inflammation Induces Ectopic Mechanical Sensitivity in Axons of Nociceptors Innervating Deep Tissues

Geoffrey M. Bove1, Bernard J. Ransil2, Hsi-Chiang Lin1 and Jeong-Gill Leem1

1 Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; 2 Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215

Submitted 25 February 2003; accepted in final form 30 April 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
A variety of seemingly diverse pain syndromes are characterized by movement-induced pain radiating in the distribution of a peripheral nerve or nerve root. This could be explained by the induction of ectopic mechanical sensitivity in intact sensory axons. Here we show that inflammation led to mechanical sensitivity of the axons of a subset of mechanically sensitive primary sensory neurons. Dorsal root recordings were made from 194 mechanically sensitive neurons that innervated deep and cutaneous structures and had C, A{delta}, and A{alpha}{beta} conduction velocities. No axons of any category were mechanically sensitive in control experiments. However, the axons of neurons innervating deep structures and having C- or A{delta}-conduction velocities became mechanically sensitive during the neuritis, and also exhibited an increased incidence of spontaneous discharge. The incidence of mechanical sensitivity followed a distinct time course. In some cases, paw withdrawal thresholds were obtained after neuritis induction. The time course of the resultant hypersensitivity was not directly related to the time course of the axonal mechanical sensitivity. Ectopic axonal mechanical sensitivity could explain some types of radiating, nerve-related pain coexisting with diseases of seemingly diverse etiologies.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Primary sensory neurons are considered to "sense" only at their endings, within the structure they innervate. Sensory quality and localization are normally initiated by the activation of modality-specific sensory transducers in the tissue being stimulated, resulting in action potentials that are carried by axons, bundled in nerves, to the CNS. However, in many human patients, movements of intact, apparently uninjured nerves far from the innervated tissue can elicit radiating pain (e.g., "sciatica"). Such movement-induced radiating pain could be explained by the induction of ectopic sensory function along the axon. Whereas cut axons of injured nerves seem to regain their original sensory function at their tips (Koschorke et al. 1991Go), reports of mechanical responses of intact sensory axons are limited to discharge unrelated to stimulus intensity (Eliav et al. 2001Go; Howe et al. 1977Go), injury discharge (Wall et al. 1974Go), and conductance changes (Julian and Goldman 1962Go). Furthermore, these observations are limited to invertebrate axons and to rapidly conducting axons that normally give rise to the sensation of touch, not pain. There is no report addressing the possibility of mechanical transduction in intact mammalian nociceptor axons, which normally subserve the sensation of pain. Yet, this possibility could explain the vast number of cases of radiating pain in the absence of overt nerve injury (Laslett et al. 1991Go; Loeser 2001Go; Riihimaki et al. 1994Go), common among patients with diseases such as back and neck pain, compressive neuropathies, diabetes, and endometriosis (Dyck et al. 2000Go; Loeser 1985Go; Waddell 1987Go; Woertgen et al. 1998Go; Zager et al. 1998Go).

Models of neuritis have recently been developed that evoke an immune-mediated inflammation (Eliav et al., 1999Go; Chacur et al., 2001Go) but do not cause disruption of the axons. Using extracellular recording techniques in a model of neuritis, we now report that inflammation of intact axons leads to axonal mechanical sensitivity. We found that this phenomenon was limited to slowly conducting axons innervating noncutaneous structures. We also found that the time course of the axonal mechanical sensitivity was not the same as the time course of the hypersensitivity that occurs with neuritis.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
All experiments were approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Neuritis model

Rat sciatic nerves were inflamed using complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) placed on the nerve 1 to 32 days before electrophysiological recordings, as previously described (Eliav et al. 1999Go). Left sciatic nerves were exposed in the mid-thigh of barbiturate-anesthetized male Wistar rats (225–250 g). Nerves were freed from underlying tissue for 6–7 mm and a 5 x 5 x 10-mm piece of absorbable gelatin sponge saturated in the test compound [CFA or incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA), approximately 150 µl] was wrapped around the nerve. The dose of mycobacterium tuberculosum in the CFA experiments was 75 µg. This resulted in a robust inflammation that started within hours, was fully established in days, and caused residual abnormal gross morphology for >=2 mo. Control experiments were performed on previously unoperated animals and 7 days after application of IFA to the nerve. Treatment with IFA did not lead to gross inflammation of the nerve at any time point.

Electrophysiology

Single-unit recordings were made from subdivided dorsal rootlets to isolate neurons with axons passing through the inflamed sciatic nerve (Fig. 1A). One to 32 days after neuritis induction, animals were anesthetized with urethane, and a lumbar laminectomy was performed to expose the contents of the spinal column. The L5 dorsal root was cut close to the dorsal root entry zone and placed over a bipolar stimulating electrode (Fig. 1A). The cut end of the dorsal root was subdivided into 7- to 10-µm filaments that were then individually placed over a bipolar recording electrode. Single shock electrical stimuli of the dorsal root using increasing intensity (<=30 V, 0.05 ms; <0.5 Hz) were used to identify C- and A{delta}-axons. Because electrical stimuli of this intensity causes electrical blockage of axons with faster conduction velocities, recordings of neurons with A{delta}-axons were performed in separate experiments. In these experiments noxious and innocuous mechanical stimuli of the foot and calf were used to initially identify the neurons, followed by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve to assess isolation. Only filaments containing clearly identifiable single waveforms were studied.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. A: methods schematic. Complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced neuritis is depicted by shaded oval under probe. Irregular shaded areas depict receptive fields. DRG, dorsal root ganglion. B: typical single unit recording. Consecutive dorsal root recordings triggered by electrical stimulation of dorsal root (0.05 ms, 30 V, 1 Hz), demonstrating fixed 15-ms latency of action potential (sweeps 1–3, 5–6) over 13 mm (1.2 m/s). The action potential of trace 4 was generated by mechanical stimulation of the distal receptive field; electrical stimulation of the nerve failed to activate the axon because it occurred within the axon's refractory period. This proved that the electrically and mechanically evoked waveforms were from the same neuron.

 

Receptive fields (RFs) for isolated neurons were located using pinching stimuli of the lower limb and foot using forceps and fingers. The loose property of skin was exploited to carefully discriminate cutaneous versus deep RFs. Cutaneous neurons had RFs that remained associated with the skin regardless of the skin excursion. If the neuron responded to pinching a fold of skin, and maintained similar responsiveness when this fold was displaced, it was concluded that the RF was associated with the skin. Deep RFs were identified through the skin and proved by moving the overlying skin and repeating the effective stimulus to the same underlying spot, through a different portion of skin. Neurons were included for study if they had mechanically sensitive RFs in the lower limb located distal to and remote from the exposed part of the sciatic nerve. Deep and/or cutaneous neurons were recorded in each experiment. Data from neurons with unclear RFs were not collected. After determining the location of the RF, the sciatic nerve was electrically stimulated immediately distal to the neuritis granuloma to determine whether the distal axon of the recorded neuron traveled through the inflamed nerve. The conduction velocity of the axon was used to classify the axon as C, A{delta}, or A{alpha}{beta} (Lawson et al. 1997Go). For C- and A{delta}-axons, the mechanically and electrically evoked action potentials were determined to be the same by stimulating the RF mechanically while stimulating the axon electrically. When the electrical stimulus occurred during the relative refractory period of the axon, it would not result in an action potential (Fig. 1B). For A{alpha}{beta}-axons the mechanically and electrically evoked action potentials were compared by visual inspection of overlying traces on the oscilloscope. Data were collected and further analyzed off-line using a PC and waveform discrimination software (Forster and Handwerker 1990Go).

Mechanical stimulation of the sciatic nerve

It was critical in these experiments to prevent axonal damage and retain electrical through-conduction of the axons being tested. Mechanical stimulation was manually applied to the nerve in a semiquantitative manner using stimulators with 5 x 10-mm conical tips (Fig. 1A). The contacting tips were molded from silicone (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning; durometer 50). While one probe provided backing, another was pressed onto the nerve. The experimenter controlled the amount of force applied, and forces were presented only relative to other forces used in the particular experiment. Forces of <=4 N can be applied with this probe; in these experiments the forces used on the nerve were limited to 2 N or less (measured earlier on an electronic scale), on a footprint of 6–8 mm2. In preliminary studies, using the probes in this manner activated nervi nervorum but did not elicit nor interrupt conduction of action potentials from axons in passage.

Pain behavior

To assess whether sciatic neuritis caused paw hypersensitivity, and to determine the time course of these changes, a graded, noxious stimulus was applied to the soles of the hindpaws. The methods were previously described (Wallas et al. 2003Go). Briefly, a 0.1-mm wire was attached perpendicular to a calibrated spring gauge (Correx, Bern, Switzerland). Rats were placed in an enclosure with a perforated metal floor, and the wire was advanced onto the glabrous skin of the foot. The force necessary to cause a withdrawal was recorded 5 times per foot, bilaterally, at 1-min intervals. There was never any other behavior before the consistently brisk withdrawal. Eleven animals were tested before application of CFA and periodically to 21 days postoperatively. Differences between operated and unoperated sides were compared using paired t-test. All animals were subsequently used for electrophysiology.

Immunocytochemistry

Sciatic nerves were harvested bilaterally 7–8 days after neuritis induction. Barbiturate-anesthetized animals were transcardially perfused with buffered saline and the sciatic nerves were harvested, flash frozen in isobutane, and sectioned at 8 µm using a cryostat. Sections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 8 min, and rinsed with PBS. Some sections were stained with H&E. Sections for immunocytochemistry were rinsed in immunohistostaining chambers (Thermo Shandon) 5 times over 20 min in PBS, blocked for 1 h with 4% normal goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 20 mg/ml bovine-globulin in PBS, and incubated with the primary antibody [ED1 (Serotec) or TCR{alpha}{beta} (BD PharMingen)] at room temperature overnight. Slides were rinsed 5 times over 20 min and incubated for 1 h in the dark with the secondary antibody [Cy3 (Chemicon) or FITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch)], rinsed 5 times over 20 min, dried, and coverslipped with Prolong (Molecular Probes). Digital images were collected on a Nikon E600 fluorescence microscope fitted with a SPOT RT camera.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Neuritis-induced mechanical sensitivity limited to the axons of deep nociceptors

A total of 194 neurons with mechanically sensitive RFs were recorded in 41 experiments, at various time points postoperatively. In unoperated and IFA control experiments, mechanical stimulation of the sciatic nerve along the inflamed portion was not effective in eliciting action potentials from through-conducting axons, regardless of the tissue innervated or conduction velocity (1/72; Table 1). The stimulus was also ineffective during CFA neuritis for all neurons with cutaneous RFs or A{alpha}{beta}-axons (0/128). In contrast, the axons of 45/111 (41%) of the neurons with noncutaneous musculoskeletal RFs were mechanically sensitive over 1–3 mm of the nerve within the granuloma (Table 1). The RFs of all these neurons responded preferentially to mechanical stimulation that was judged by the experimenter to be noxious. The proportions of mechanically sensitive axons of neurons with C-axons (37/92) and A{delta}-axons (8/19) were not different (P = 0.94, by chi-square test). Importantly, the axons consistently responded to increasing mechanical stimuli with increasing discharge, indicating that the axons were encoding the relative intensity of the stimuli (Fig. 2, A–C). There was no sustained discharge after the mechanical stimulation. The response to axon stimulation was repeatable, demonstrating that the stimuli did not cause gross damage to the axon, which would have resulted in transient, irregular, and nonreproducible injury discharge (Howe et al. 1977Go; Wall et al. 1974Go). Furthermore, the subsequent response of the distal RF after the axonal stimuli demonstrated that the stimuli did not disable the axon's normal function of transmitting action potentials (Fig. 2, A–C). In contrast, the only response that could be elicited from 3 of the A{alpha}{beta} axons was during very intense stimuli (approximately 4 N, using the probe), which resulted in 1–3 action potentials and subsequently interrupted through-conduction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. General properties of characterized neurons

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. A–C: responses of axons of 3 Group IV neurons to mechanical stimulation of sciatic nerve, recorded during CFA-induced neuritis at postoperative day 15 (A), day 2 (B), and day 6 (C). Arrows indicate responses to digital pressure on the neuron's receptive field, located in calf muscle (A and B), ankle joint capsule (C), or in glabrous skin of foot (D). Short horizontal lines over responses indicate mechanical stimulation of the nerve; relative thickness of line indicates relative force applied. Response of neurons to mechanical stimulation of receptive field after nerve stimuli demonstrates that the stimulus did not interfere with the axon's function of transmitting action potentials. D: axon of cutaneous neuron with C-axon (postoperative day 7) failed to respond to mechanical stimulation of the nerve performed during time indicated by connected arrows. Bins = 1 s. Small insets in each figure are superimposed waveforms randomly selected from each response epoch [n = 8 (A), n = 5 (B–D)].

 

To establish a time course of the incidence of the axonal mechanical sensitivity (AMS) during neuritis, later experiments focused on characterizing deep neurons. The time course of the percentages of AMS (Fig. 3A) best fit a curve of the form

where k = 22.91, {alpha} = 1.112, and {beta} = –0.1467 (t = time in days; P = 0.0001). This curve shows that after applying CFA, 72% of the axons became mechanically sensitive by 7.6 days. The time to reach 1/2 %AMSmax was 1.9 days, and the time to decline to 1/2 %AMSmax after reaching maximum was 19 days.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. A: time course of axonal mechanical sensitivity during CFA neuritis. %AMS, percentage of neurons with axonal mechanical sensitivity. Data taken from Table 2. B: time course of paw withdrawal threshold measurements during CFA neuritis. Paw withdrawal thresholds of the affected paws (closed circles) decreased until day 4, after which they gradually increased to merge with the thresholds of the unaffected paws (open circles), at day 14.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Postoperative timing of recordings and proportions of mechanically sensitive axons

 

Neuritis-induced ongoing activity in deep nociceptors

Action potentials in the absence of evident or applied stimuli are termed ongoing activity (OA). Ongoing activity was recorded for 2 min after the RF was located, and after mechanical stimulation of the nerve. During CFA neuritis, more deep neurons with C- and A{delta}-axons had OA (19/111) than did cutaneous neurons with C- and A{delta}-axons recorded during the same experiments [2/43; P < 0.05 (chi-square)], or than did deep neurons with C- and A{delta}-axons recorded during the control experiment [1/27; P = 0.05 (Fisher's exact)]. No neurons with A{delta}-axons expressed OA (when muscle spindles or cutaneous units were characterized, which often have OA, there was always a physiological position in which the OA would cease). When present, the OA was always irregular, with rates ranging from 0.3 to 2 Hz (mean 0.9 ± 0.43 Hz). Of the 19 deep neurons with OA, axonal mechanical sensitivity was observed in 7. Mechanical stimulation of the nerve induced OA in one neuron. During neuritis, OA occurred with equal frequency among neurons with AMS (7/45) and neurons with insensitive axons (12/66; P = 0.94). These findings suggest that the capacities to develop axonal mechanical sensitivity and OA are independent features of these sensory neurons.

Neuritis led to cutaneous hypersensitivity

Animals did not exhibit postural abnormalities or autotomy after the surgery. The withdrawal thresholds of the paws on the side of CFA neuritis (left) decreased during the first 4 days, and then increased to a similar value to the contralateral, unoperated side (right) by day 14 (Fig. 3B). The right paw thresholds decreased slightly but not significantly during the 21-day test period. The respective left and right thresholds were significantly different by paired t-test (P = 0.001), demonstrating that the neuritis resulted in hypersensitivity of the ipsilateral, but not contralateral paw, for days 2–10. Sensitivity changes did not occur after surgical control experiments, where the sciatic nerve was exposed and mobilized (data not shown).

Immunocytochemistry of the inflamed nerve

At 7 days postoperatively, the affected section of the nerve was characterized by encasement with granulation tissue and hyperemia of the intrinsic vasculature. Histology of the lesion demonstrated epineurial edema, increased lymphocytes, and a massive infiltration of macrophages within the epineurium and the granuloma (Fig. 4, B, D, and F). Axonotmesis resulting from this procedure is reported to be minimal (Eliav et al. 1999Go, 2001Go), and this is suggested by the paucity of immune cells within the fascicles (Fig. 4, D and E).



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Features of neuritis attributed to CFA. H&E-stained sections of normal (A) and treated nerves (B) from same animal at postoperative day 7 revealed epineurial edema in response to CFA. TCR{alpha}{beta} (C and D) and ED1 (E and F) immunoreactivity demonstrated aggregation of T lymphocytes and macrophages, respectively, in epineurium, but not within fascicles of CFA-treated nerve (D and F), compared with normal nerve (C and E). Asterisks in A and B indicate epineurium; arrows indicate perineurium; measurement bar =100 µm.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
These data demonstrate that neurons innervating deep structures and having properties of nociceptors (i.e., slow conduction velocities and high mechanical activation thresholds) developed axonal mechanical sensitivity during neuritis. The other types of neurons that we studied were not affected. Furthermore, in control nerves, no axons were mechanically sensitive. It is likely that our recordings included so-called silent nociceptors (Lewin and Mendell 1994Go; Meyer et al. 1991Go). We employed noxious stimuli in the search for receptive fields, and thus especially for deep neurons, the tissues containing the terminals were often swollen, and therefore inflamed, before identification. Such inflammation is likely to reveal the latent receptive fields of otherwise silent nociceptors (Kress et al. 1992Go), making specific identification of such neurons improbable. Inflammation is also known to induce ongoing activity. Although we observed a statistically significant, increased incidence of ongoing activity in deep neurons during neuritis, these data must also be considered carefully because of the methodology used to identify the receptive fields. With these data, we cannot rule out that the axons of silent nociceptors from either deep or cutaneous tissues become mechanically sensitive during neuritis.

The development of axonal mechanical sensitivity was induced by local inflammation, which was characterized by the recruitment of epineurial macrophages and lymphocytes. This cellular infiltrate may play a key role in the axonal mechanical sensitivity. These cells lead to increased levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, which increases sodium conductance in mammalian cell membranes (Hribar et al. 1999Go) and induces spontaneous activity in nociceptors when applied to axons (Leem and Bove 2002Go; Sorkin et al. 1997Go). Coupled with two normal features of neurons and their axons, increased sodium conductance could lead to the observed mechanical sensitivity and ongoing activity. First, mechanical stimulation of normal axons causes a graded, Na+-dependent membrane depolarization, although this depolarization is insufficient to elicit more than a solitary action potential (Ganot et al. 1981Go; Gross et al. 1983Go; Julian and Goldman 1962Go; Petrov and Usherwood 1994Go). Increased sodium conductance could render the normally subthreshold depolarizations attributed to mechanical stimuli sufficient to initiate action potentials. Second, the membrane potential in sensory neurons oscillates, dependent on Na+ channels, and normally approaches but does not reach the triggering threshold of the neuron (Amir et al. 1999Go). These oscillations become greater as the membrane is depolarized (Amir et al. 1999Go). Such oscillations would be potentiated by increased sodium conductance or sodium current, and could lead to spontaneous activity. Importantly, these oscillations are more pronounced in neurons innervating noncutaneous structures (Liu et al. 2002Go), which may be the basis for our observations that only the axons of noncutaneous neurons became mechanically sensitive.

Many nerve injury models lead to sensory changes that are detectable in the distribution of the nerve, that is, within the tissue that is innervated (Chacur et al. 2001Go; Eliav et al. 1999Go; Kim et al. 1997Go; Seltzer et al. 1990Go). In our model, there was altered cutaneous sensitivity in the innervation territory of the CFA-treated sciatic nerves, consistent with previous reports of CFA-induced neuritis (Clatworthy et al. 1995Go; Eliav et al. 1999Go; Wallas et al. 2003Go). The tests used rely on cutaneous sensors as the afferent limb of a withdrawal reflex. However, in our electrophysiological experiments and in similar models, such neurons did not demonstrate ongoing activity (Michaelis et al. 2000Go) or mechanical sensitivity changes (Bulka et al. 2002Go). Moreover, cutaneous allodynia seems dependent on at least transient activation of slowly conducting axons (Vatine et al. 1998Go). These findings, and ours, suggest that the observed sensitivity change was related to changes in the sensitivity of higher-order neurons that receive convergent information from the noncutaneous peripheral neurons that were sensitized by the neuritis. Alternatively, the cutaneous sensitivity may have been secondary to changes in ongoing activity of silent nociceptors (not specifically recorded from, as discussed above), or transient changes in neurons with faster conducting axons, which were not tested before or at the peak of heightened cutaneous sensitivity.

The appearance of axonal mechanical sensitivity during neuritis is consistent with reports of typically deep pain radiation provoked by mechanical stimulation of inflamed human dorsal roots (Kuslich et al. 1991Go; Smyth and Wright 1958Go; G. M. Bove and Z. H. Bajwa, unpublished observations), and radiating deep pain in the apparent absence of nerve injury (Verdugo and Ochoa 1993Go). Neuritis has long been recognized as a common malady of the peripheral nervous system (Gowers 1886Go), and can occur as a result of direct nerve injury or by extension from other diseases with inflammatory components, such as diabetes and endometriosis (Dyck et al. 2000Go; Zager et al. 1998Go). Neuritis may be a common denominator in these otherwise seemingly unrelated disorders. The development of axonal mechanical sensitivity seems necessary to explain some clinical features of patients with radiating pain worsened by movements (e.g., "sciatica"), suffered by more than one-half of the population at some point in their lives (Frymoyer et al. 1983Go; Hult 1954Go). Furthermore, the appearance of mechanical transduction in a location that does not normally support such transduction may provide an opportunity for discovering the elusive mechanism of mechanical transduction.


    DISCLOSURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health Grant AT-00188 to G. M. Bove, through the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Data organization and analysis were performed on the PROPHET System (release 4.1), a national computing resource for life sciences research sponsored by NIH, Division of Research Resources.

Present address of J.-G. Leem, Department of Anesthesiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 388-1, Pungnap-Dong, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Korea 138-736.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank M. Devor, A. Strassman, P. Grigg, and L. Houghton for helpful suggestions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests: G. M. Bove, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Dana 721, Boston, MA 02215 (E-mail: gbove{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 DISCLOSURES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Amir R, Michaelis M, and Devor M. Membrane potential oscillations in dorsal root ganglion neurons: role in normal electrogenesis and neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 19: 8589–8596, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bulka A, Hao JX, and Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Response characteristics of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in neuropathic rats. Neurosci Lett 317: 89–92, 2002.[ISI][Medline]

Chacur M, Milligan ED, Gazda LS, Armstrong C, Wang HC, Tracey KJ, Maier SF, and Watkins LR. A new model of sciatic inflammatory neuritis (SIN): induction of unilateral and bilateral mechanical allodynia following acute unilateral peri-sciatic immune activation in rats. Pain 94: 231–244, 2001.[ISI][Medline]

Clatworthy AL, Illich PA, Castro GA, and Walters ET. Role of periaxonal inflammation in the development of thermal hyperalgesia and guarding behavior in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neurosci Lett 184: 5–8, 1995.[ISI][Medline]

Dyck PJB, Engelstad J, Norell J, and Dyck PJ. Microvasculitis in non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LSRPN): similarity to the diabetic variety (DLSRPN). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59: 525–538, 2000.[ISI][Medline]

Eliav E, Benoliel R, and Tal M. Inflammation with no axonal damage of the rat saphenous nerve trunk induces ectopic discharge and mechanosensitivity in myelinated axons. Neurosci Lett 311: 49–52, 2001.[ISI][Medline]

Eliav E, Herzberg U, Ruda MA, and Bennett GJ. Neuropathic pain from an experimental neuritis of the rat sciatic nerve. Pain 83: 168–182, 1999.

Forster C and Handwerker HO. Automatic classification and analysis of microneurographic spike data using a PC/AT. J Neurosci Methods 31: 109–118, 1990.[ISI][Medline]

Frymoyer JW, Clements JH, Wilder DG, MacPherson B, and Ashikaga T. Risk factors in low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg 65A: 213–218, 1983.[Free Full Text]

Ganot G, Wong BS, Binstock L, and Ehrenstein G. Reversal potentials corresponding to mechanical stimulation and leakage current in Myxicola giant axons. Biochim Biophys Acta 649: 487–491, 1981.[Medline]

Gowers WR. A Manual of Diseases of the Nervous System. Philadelphia, PA: P. Blakiston, 1886.

Gross D, Williams WS, and Conor JA. Theory of electromechanical effects in nerve. Cell Mol Neurobiol 3: 89–111, 1983.[ISI][Medline]

Howe JF, Loeser JD, and Calvin WH. Mechanosensitivity of dorsal root ganglia and chronically injured axons: a physiological basis for the radicular pain of nerve root compression. Pain 3: 25–41, 1977.[ISI][Medline]

Hribar M, Bloc A, van der Goot FG, Fransen L, De Baetselier P, Grau GE, Bluethmann H, Matthay MA, Dunant Y, Pugin J, and Lucas R. The lectin-like domain of tumor necrosis factor-alpha increases membrane conductance in microvascular endothelial cells and peritoneal macrophages. Eur J Immunol 29: 3105–3111, 1999.[ISI][Medline]

Hult L. Cervical dorsal and lumbar spinal syndromes. Acta Orthop Scand 17: 1–102, 1954.

Julian FJ and Goldman DE. The effects of mechanical stimulation on some electrical properties of axons. J Gen Physiol 46: 297–313, 1962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim KJ, Yoon YW, and Chung JM. Comparison of three rodent neuropathic pain models. Exp Brain Res 113: 200–206, 1997.[ISI][Medline]

Koschorke GM, Meyer RA, Tillman DB, and Campbell JN. Ectopic excitability of injured nerves in monkey: entrained responses to vibratory stimuli. J Neurophysiol 65: 693–701, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kress M, Koltzenburg M, Reeh PW, and Handwerker HO. Responsiveness and functional attributes of electrically localized terminals of cutaneous C-fibers in vivo and in vitro. J Neurophysiol 68: 581–595, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, and Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 22: 181–187, 1991.[ISI][Medline]

Laslett M, Crothers C, Beattie P, Cregten L, and Moses A. The frequency and incidence of low back pain/sciatica in an urban population. N Z Med J 104: 424–426, 1991.[ISI][Medline]

Lawson SN, Crepps BA, and Perl ER. Relationship of substance P to afferent characteristics of dorsal root ganglion neurones in guinea-pig. J Physiol 505: 177–191, 1997.[ISI][Medline]

Leem JG and Bove GM. Mid-axonal tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces ectopic activity in a subset of slowly conducting cutaneous and deep afferent neurons. J Pain 3: 45–49, 2002.[ISI][Medline]

Lewin GR and Mendell LM. Regulation of cutaneous C-fiber heat nociceptors by nerve growth factor in the developing rat. J Neurophysiol 71: 941–949, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu CN, Devor M, Waxman SG, and Kocsis JD. Subthreshold oscillations induced by spinal nerve injury in dissociated muscle and cutaneous afferents of mouse DRG. J Neurophysiol 87: 2009–2017, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Loeser JD. Pain due to nerve injury. Spine 10: 232–235, 1985.[ISI][Medline]

Loeser JD. Cervicobrachial neuralgia. In: Bonica's Management of Pain, edited by Loeser JD. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, p. 1019–1031.

Meyer RA, Davis KD, Cohen RH, Treede R-D, and Campbell JN. Mechanically insensitive afferents (MIAs) in cutaneous nerves of monkey. Brain Res 561: 252–261, 1991.[ISI][Medline]

Michaelis M, Liu XG, and Janig W. Axotomized and intact muscle afferents but no skin afferents develop ongoing discharges of dorsal root ganglion origin after peripheral nerve lesion. J Neurosci 20: 2742–2748, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Petrov AG and Usherwood PN. Mechanosensitivity of cell membranes. Ion channels, lipid matrix and cytoskeleton. Eur Biophys J 23: 1–19, 1994.[ISI][Medline]

Riihimaki H, Viikari-Juntura E, Moneta G, Kuha J, Videman T, and Tola S. Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. A three-year follow-up. Spine 19: 138–142, 1994.[ISI][Medline]

Seltzer Z, Dubner R, and Shir Y. A novel behavioral model of neuropathic pain disorders produced in rats by partial sciatic nerve injury. Pain 43: 205–218, 1990.[ISI][Medline]

Smyth MJ and Wright V. Sciatica and the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg 4A: 1401–1418, 1958.

Sorkin LS, Xiao W-H, Wagner R, and Myers RR. Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} induces ectopic activity in nociceptive primary afferent fibers. Neuroscience 255–262, 1997.

Vatine JJ, Argov R, and Seltzer Z. Brief electrical stimulation of c-fibers in rats produces thermal hyperalgesia lasting weeks. Neurosci Lett 246: 125–128, 1998.[ISI][Medline]

Verdugo RJ and Ochoa JL. Use and misuse of conventional electrodiagnosis, quantitative sensory testing, thermography, and nerve blocks in the evaluation of painful neuropathic syndromes. Muscle Nerve 16: 1056–1062, 1993.[ISI][Medline]

Waddell G. Clinical diagnosis of leg pain and nerve root involvement in low back disorders. Acta Orthop Belgica 53: 152–155, 1987.[Medline]

Wall PD, Waxman S, and Basbaum AI. Ongoing activity in peripheral nerve: injury discharge. Exp Neurol 45: 576–589, 1974.[ISI][Medline]

Wallas TR, Winterson BJ, Ransil BJ, and Bove GM. Paw Withdrawal Thresholds and Persistent Hindlimb Flexion in Experimental Mononeuropathies. J Pain 4: 222–230, 2003.[ISI][Medline]

Woertgen C, Holzschuh M, Rothoerl RD, and Brawanski A. Clinical signs in patients with brachialgia and sciatica: a comparative study. Surg Neurol 49: 210–214, 1998.[ISI][Medline]

Zager EL, Pfeifer SM, Brown MJ, Torosian MH, and Hackney DB. Catamenial mononeuropathy and radiculopathy: a treatable neuropathic disorder. J Neurosurg 88: 827–830, 1998.[ISI][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
A. Dilley and G. M. Bove
Disruption of axoplasmic transport induces mechanical sensitivity in intact rat C-fibre nociceptor axons
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 593 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. M. S. Weragoda, E. Ferrer, and E. T. Walters
Memory-Like Alterations in Aplysia Axons after Nerve Injury or Localized Depolarization
J. Neurosci., November 17, 2004; 24(46): 10393 - 10401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/3/1949    most recent
00175.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bove, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leem, J.-G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bove, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leem, J.-G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the The American Physiological Society.