| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School/Children's Hospital, Boston Massachusetts, 02115; 2 Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, Dental School, Århus University, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark; 3 Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, DK-9220, Denmark; 4 Department of Anesthesia, Aalborg Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark; 5 Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1G6 Canada
Submitted 10 April 2003; accepted in final form 16 June 2003
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; Ren and Dubner 1999; Schaible et al. 2002; Sessle 2000; Woolf and Thompson 1991). Clinically available NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine and dextromethorphan have been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of deep tissue pain in both clinical and experimental research (Gordon et al. 1999; Graven-Nielsen et al. 2000; Henriksson and Sorensen 2002; Mathisen et al. 1995; Nikolajsen et al. 1996). However, their use is often limited by central side effects that include blurred vision, sedation, and distorted sensory perception.
It has been speculated that peripheral NMDA receptors may also play a role in cutaneous and deep tissue pain and as such may be a useful target for the development of novel analgesic drugs (Alfredson and Lorentzon 2002; Alfredson et al. 2001; Cairns et al. 1998; Carlton and Coggeshall 1999; Carlton et al. 1995, 2003; Lawand et al. 1997; McRoberts et al. 2001; You et al. 2002). Indeed, it has been recognized that NMDA receptors are also found in deep tissues in association with the terminal endings of nerve fibers (Alfredson and Lorentzon 2002; Alfredson et al. 2001; McRoberts et al. 2001). Further, injection of glutamate into deep craniofacial tissues such as the temporomandibular (jaw) joint or masseter (jaw-closer) muscle excites nociceptive afferent fibers (Cairns et al. 2001a,b, 2002). Parallel experiments in human subjects indicate that glutamate injection into the masseter muscle evokes an aching-like pain which lasts for 5–10 min postinjection (Cairns et al. 2001a, 2003b; Svensson et al. 2003). Nevertheless, afferent fiber discharges and muscle pain are only evoked after relatively high concentrations of glutamate (>100 mM) are injected into deep craniofacial tissues, which may mean that nonspecific mechanisms, rather than NMDA receptor activation per se, are responsible for these effects of glutamate. The present investigation compared the effectiveness of NMDA receptor antagonists in attenuating glutamate- and hypertonic-saline-evoked masseter muscle afferent fiber discharges in rats and masseter muscle pain in humans to determine whether injection of glutamate into the masseter muscle activates peripheral NMDA receptors.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
ANIMAL PREPARATION. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats of either sex (weight: 225–385 g) were prepared for acute in vivo recording of trigeminal afferent discharges (Cairns et al. 2001a,b, 2002, 2003a). Gas anesthesia (O2: 0.3–0.4 l/min; isoflurane 2.0–2.5%) was administered through a tracheal cannula. Heart rate and body core temperature were continuously monitored throughout the whole experiment and kept within the physiological range of 330–430/min and 36.8–37.1°C, respectively. The Boston Children's Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee approved all surgeries and procedures.
STIMULATION AND RECORDING TECHNIQUES. Single trigeminal afferent unit activity within the trigeminal ganglion was recorded by a parylene-coated tungsten microelectrode (2 M
, A-M Systems). A blunt probe was applied as a mechanical search stimulus to the skin over the masseter muscle while the electrode was slowly lowered in an attempt to identify trigeminal afferent fibers with a muscle mechanoreceptive field. When a unit was found that appeared to respond to mechanical stimulation of the masseter muscle, the skin overlying the mechanoreceptive field was pulled gently away from contact with the muscle, and brush, pinch, and pressure stimuli were applied directly to the skin surface. If the unit did not respond to any of these cutaneous stimuli, then the mechanoreceptive field was considered to lie within the muscle. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) were used to estimate the mechanical activation threshold of afferent fibers.
To confirm that masseter muscle afferent fibers in the current study projected to the caudal brain stem, constant-current electrical stimuli (50-µs biphasic pulse, range: 10–80 µA, 0.5 Hz) were applied to a stimulating electrode (2M, parylene-coated tungsten electrode, A-M Systems) lowered into the ipsilateral caudal brain stem to evoke antidromic action potentials (Cairns et al. 2001a,b 2002, 2003a). Antidromic action potentials were collided with orthodromic action potentials evoked by mechanical stimulation of the masseter muscle to confirm the projection of the masseter muscle afferent fiber to the caudal brain stem. At the end of the experiment, the distance between the stimulating and recording electrodes was measured and divided by the latency of the antidromically evoked response of an afferent fiber to give an estimation of the conduction velocity (CV) of the recorded afferent fiber.
After the preceding characterization of each afferent fiber was completed, the needle tip of a catheter (a 27-gauge needle connected by polyethylene tubing to a Hamilton syringe, 50 µl) was carefully inserted into the afferent receptive field in the masseter muscle (Cairns et al. 2001a,b, 2002). This catheter was used to inject 10 µl of NMDA (0.5, 5, 50, or 500 mM) to assess if a concentration-response relationship exists. The catheter was also used to inject 10 µl of glutamate (500 mM) or hypertonic saline (1.0 M) alone or in combination with the NMDA receptor antagonists 2-amino-5-phosphonvalerate (APV; 1, 10, or 100 mM), ketamine (1, 10, or 20 mM), or dextromethorphan (1, 10, or 40 mM).
All solutions were adjusted to 
pH 7.0 prior to injection. Chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Baseline primary afferent fiber activity was recorded for 10 min prior to injection of any substance into the masseter muscle. NMDA, glutamate, or hypertonic saline was then slowly injected into the masseter muscle (over a 5-s period), and any resulting afferent activity was monitored for 10 min after the injection. A second injection into the masseter muscle of glutamate or hypertonic saline alone or combined with the NMDA receptor antagonists was made 30 min after the initial injection, and any resulting afferent activity again monitored for 10 min after the injection.
DATA ANALYSIS. The activity of identified afferent fibers was amplified (gain: 1,000 times; bandwidth: 30–1,000 Hz) and fed into a computer equipped with a CED 1401 Plus board and analysis software (Spike 2; Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK). Cumulative afferent discharges were calculated by subtracting the summed action potential discharges for 10 min after injection from the baseline (spontaneous) afferent discharges 10 min prior to injection. The cumulative afferent discharges evoked by the second injection were divided by the cumulative afferent discharges evoked by the first injection to yield relative cumulative activity.
Human experiments
SUBJECTS. Fourteen male human volunteers (mean age ± SD: 27 ± 5 yr) took part in a double-blind, crossover experiment to investigate whether 10 mM ketamine would selectively block glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain as opposed to pain evoked by hypertonic saline. The subjects had no signs or symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (Dworkin and LeResche 1992) and were recruited from university students. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee in Denmark (Counties of Nordjylland and Viborg) and followed the guidelines set out by the Helsinki Declaration.
PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLDS. A pressure algometer (1 cm2 probe area, Somedic, Sweden) was used to measure pressure pain thresholds by applying it to the masseter muscle at 30 kPa/s while the subjects kept their jaw at rest (Svensson et al. 2003). A window display on the pressure algometer aided in the application of pressure at a constant rate. Pressure pain thresholds were determined for both the left and right masseter muscles prior to injection of any solutions. At the end of the experimental session, the pressure pain threshold for the left masseter muscle was again determined, and then ketamine (10 mM, 0.2 ml, Ketalar, Park Davis) alone was injected into the left masseter muscle. Five minutes after injection of ketamine, the pressure pain threshold for the left masseter muscle was again determined.
Sterile solutions of glutamate (0.2 ml; 1.0 M; pH = 7.2) or buffered hypertonic saline (0.2 ml; 1.0 M; pH = 7.4) alone or in combination with ketamine (10 mM; Ketalar, Park Davis) were injected over a 10-s period with a 27-gauge hypodermic needle and disposable syringe into the right masseter muscle midway between its upper and lower border and 1 cm posterior to its anterior border (Svensson et al. 1995). Ketamine alone was injected into the left masseter muscle to test its effect on pressure pain threshold. In all experiments, subjects were given standardized instructions, and both subjects and examiners were unaware of which solution was about to be injected. During each session, two injections into the masseter muscle were made 30 min apart. All subjects participated in four sessions; each session was separated by a minimum of 1 wk.
The subjects were instructed to continuously rate the pain evoked by each injection of glutamate or hypertonic saline on an electronic visual analogue scale (VAS). A computer sampled the VAS signals every 2 s. The lower endpoint of the VAS was labeled "no pain at all" and the upper endpoint labeled "the most pain imaginable." Peak pain was measured as the peak VAS score, the area under the VAS curve was used to obtain a measure of the overall amount of pain, and the onset to offset of pain was determined from the VAS profiles and used as a measure of pain duration.
Statistics
In rats, because relative cumulative activity data were not normally distributed, a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks and a post hoc Dunn's test were used to assess statistical differences. The Mann-Whitney test was employed to compare mechanical thresholds and chemically evoked responses between males and female rats. A Spearman correlation was performed to assess the relationship between mechanical threshold and afferent CV, CV and cumulative afferent discharges as well as NMDA, glutamate or hypertonic saline-evoked cumulative afferent discharges and mechanical threshold. Rat afferent fiber data (force, pressure, CV, discharges) in the text is the median and interquartile range (square brackets).
In the human experiments, pressure pain thresholds before and after injection of ketamine alone were analyzed with a paired t-test and the peak, duration, and overall pain were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test. In all tests, the level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
The characteristics of 187 individual masseter muscle afferent fibers (n = 101 rats), which projected to the caudal brain stem and responded to an initial injection of glutamate, NMDA or hypertonic saline, are consistent with our previous findings (Cairns et al. 2001a,b, 2002, 2003a). All of these fibers had conduction velocities <25 m/s. Only 6% (n = 11) were C fibers (<2.5 m/s), 59% (n = 111) were slow A
fibers (
2.5–<10 m/s), and the remaining 35% (n = 65) were fast A fibers (10 m/s; Fig. 1). All fibers were mechanoreceptive (force: 123 [82–282] mN, Pressure: 196 [118–340] kPa, CV: 6.3 [4.8–12] m/s), and most of the afferent fibers (90%) exhibited slowly adapting responses to sustained mechanical stimulation prior to injection of compounds into their receptive fields. There was a significant inverse correlation between mechanical threshold and afferent CV (r = –0.32, P < 0.05). The mechanical threshold of 33% of these afferent fibers exceeded 280 kPa (n = 62, force: 744 [302–744] mN; pressure: 468 [383–469] kPa; CV: 5.4 [4.4–6.9] m/s), which suggests that these fibers were nociceptors since this value exceeds the mean pressure pain threshold of male human subjects in this study (see following text). There was no significant difference in mechanical threshold when afferent fibers recorded in male (n = 94, force: 148 [83–743] mN; pressure: 202 [122–468] kPa; CV: 6.4 [4.8–12.6] m/s) and female (n = 93, force: 115 [78–282] mN; pressure: 196 [117–287] kPa; CV: 6.2 [4.8–11.4] m/s) rats were compared.
|
In afferent fibers that were excited by an initial injection of 500 mM glutamate (n = 102), there was a significant inverse relationship between CV and glutamate-evoked cumulative afferent discharges (r = –0.43, P < 0.05). Similarly, in afferent fibers that were excited by an initial injection of 1.0 M saline (n = 40), which was used as a control, there was also a significant inverse relationship between CV and hypertonic saline-evoked cumulative afferent discharges (r = –0.38, P < 0.05; Fig. 1). Only 10 afferent fibers that were excited by 500 mM NMDA were examined, and thus the inverse relationship between CV and NMDA-evoked cumulative afferent discharges (n = 10; r = –0.515, P = 0.116) was not significant.
The mechanical threshold of 30, 40, and 40% of afferent fibers that responded to 500 mM glutamate (n = 31, force: 744 [282–744] mN; pressure: 468 [288–469] kPa; CV: 5.3 [4.3–6.4] m/s), 1.0 M saline (n = 16, force: 744 [743–1234] mN; pressure: 468 [468–594] kPa; CV: 5.1 [4.4–6.5] m/s), and 500 mM NMDA (n = 4, force: 513 [282–744] mN; pressure: 378 [288–468] kPa; CV: 5.3 [4.7–8.2] m/s), respectively, exceeded 280 kPa. There was, however, no significant relationship between glutamate-, NMDA-, or hypertonic-saline-evoked cumulative afferent discharges and mechanical threshold.
Consistent with our previous results (Cairns et al. 2001a,b, 2002, 2003a), glutamate-evoked cumulative afferent discharges were significantly larger in female (n = 51, discharges: 55 [22–291] spikes; CV: 6.1 [4.4–11.3] m/s,) than in male (n = 51, discharges: 23 [8–91] spikes; CV: 7.0 [4.8–12.4] m/s) rats (P < 0.05). There were no significant sex-related differences in the cumulative afferent discharges evoked by either 1.0 M saline or 500 mM NMDA.
Injection of NMDA, which is a selective agonist for the NMDA receptor, into the masseter muscle evoked afferent discharges in a concentration-related manner (Fig. 2). A comparison of glutamate- and NMDA-evoked masseter muscle afferent fiber discharges indicates that 5 (n = 10), 50 (n = 14), or 500 (n = 10) mM NMDA-evoked afferent discharges were not significantly different from afferent discharges evoked by injection of 500 mM glutamate (n = 102; Fig. 2). Previous work indicates that 100 mM glutamate does not evoke significant afferent discharges (Cairns et al. 2001a, 2002). Thus NMDA appears to be a more potent excitant of masseter muscle afferent fibers than glutamate.
|
Repeated injection of glutamate alone (n = 12) evoked reproducible afferent discharges (Fig. 3). The mechanical threshold of 25% of these afferent fibers exceeded 280 kPa. Significant attenuation of glutamate-evoked afferent discharges was achieved by co-injection of 10 mM (n = 10) and 100 mM (n = 10) APV but not 1 mM (n = 10) APV (Fig. 3). The mechanical threshold of 20, 10, and 10% of afferent fibers examined with 1, 10, and 100 mM APV, respectively, exceeded 280 kPa. Significant attenuation of glutamate-evoked afferent discharges was also achieved by co-injection of 10 mM (n = 11) and 20 mM (n = 10) ketamine, but not 1 mM (n = 10) ketamine (Fig. 3). The mechanical threshold of 70, 50, and 60% of afferent fibers examined with 1, 10, and 20 mM ketamine, respectively, exceeded 280 kPa. Significant attenuation of glutamate-evoked afferent discharges occurred after co-injection of 40 mM dextromethorphan (n = 10) but not after 1 mM (n = 10) or 10 (n = 10) mM dextromethorphan. The mechanical threshold of 30, 50, and 60% of afferent fibers examined with 1, 10, and 40 mM dextromethorphan, respectively, exceeded 280 kPa.
|
To determine whether the effects of these antagonists were selective for glutamate-evoked afferent discharges, control experiments that employed repeated injection of hypertonic saline were performed. Repeated injection of hypertonic saline (n = 10) also evoked reproducible afferent discharges (Fig. 4). The mechanical threshold of 30% of these afferent fibers exceeded 280 kPa. Hypertonic saline-evoked discharges were not significantly affected by co-injection of 10 mM APV (n = 10) or 10 mM ketamine (n = 10); however, they were significantly attenuated by 40 mM dextromethorphan (n = 10; Fig. 4). The mechanical threshold of 60, 70, and 40% of afferent fibers in the APV, ketamine, and dextromethorphan groups, respectively, exceeded 280 kPa.
|
Human experiments
Masseter muscle pressure pain thresholds (mean ± SD) were bilaterally symmetrical (right: 276 ± 77, left: 279 ± 70 kPa) in the 14 men. Five minutes after injection of 10 mM ketamine alone into the left masseter muscle, the pressure pain threshold in the left masseter muscle (280 ± 63 kPa) was not significantly altered.
Repeated injections of glutamate (1.0 M) or hypertonic saline (1.0 M) into the right masseter muscle evoked reproducible pain responses (Fig. 5A). Co-injection of 10 mM ketamine with glutamate significantly attenuated the intensity of glutamate-evoked pain; this attenuation was reflected as a significant decrease in the relative VAS peak and area (Fig. 5B). Co-injection of 10 mM ketamine with hypertonic saline had no significant effect on the intensity of hypertonic saline-evoke pain.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
, 2003b; Svensson et al. 1995, 1998, 2003) and 33% of these afferent fibers had mechanical thresholds at or above the human pressure pain threshold. Thus many of the masseter muscle afferent fibers examined in the present study were likely nociceptors. Injection of NMDA into the masseter muscle of isoflurane anesthetized rats was found to potently excite afferent fibers, whereas local injection of NMDA receptor antagonists was observed to almost entirely abolish glutamate-evoked afferent discharges in a concentration-related manner. Because isoflurane is a putative NMDA receptor antagonist (Hollmann et al. 2001; Ming et al. 2002; Nishikawa and MacIver 2000), our results may actually underestimate the contribution of peripheral NMDA receptor activation to glutamate-evoked afferent discharges. Thus not only are these findings consistent with the idea that masseter muscle afferent fibers are excited by activation of peripheral NMDA receptors, they also suggest that peripheral nonNMDA receptor activation may be less important for excitation of muscle afferent fibers than for excitation of other deep tissue afferent fibers such as those in the temporomandibular and knee joints (Cairns et al. 1998; Lawand et al. 1997). In human subjects, glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain was also significantly decreased by co-injection of the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine. Therefore the present results indicate that glutamate injection into the masseter muscle evokes pain in human subjects through activation of peripheral NMDA receptors and suggest that this pain is mediated, in part, through the activation of peripheral NMDA receptors associated with masseter muscle nociceptors.
In the current study, hypertonic saline injections were employed as a control nociceptive stimulus to test for nonspecific inhibitory actions of the NMDA receptor antagonists based on the assumption that hypertonic saline would not activate peripheral NMDA receptors. Although it remains unclear exactly how hypertonic saline does evoke afferent discharges or muscle pain, it has been theorized that the osmotic strength of hypertonic saline solutions shrinks the terminal endings of sensory fibers, an effect that may excite the afferent fibers directly through an opening of stretch-insensitive sodium channels or indirectly through local release of excitatory peptides (Garland et al. 1995; Schumacher et al. 2000). A recent report, which found that injection of hypertonic saline into the calf muscle also elevated muscle glutamate concentrations, calls into question the assumption that intramuscular injection of hypertonic saline would not activate the NMDA receptor (Tegeder et al. 2002). However, in this study of Tegeder et al. (2002) there was a poor temporal relationship between hypertonic saline-evoked pain and increased glutamate levels, which did not become significantly elevated until 20 min after the muscle pain had subsided. Thus in support of the assumption that hypertonic saline would not activate peripheral NMDA receptors, it appears unlikely based on the results of Tegeder et al. (2002) that elevation of glutamate levels contributes significantly to hypertonic saline-evoked muscle pain.
Ketamine and dextromethorphan, when given systemically, are thought to be efficacious for the treatment of deep tissue pain in humans due to their ability to noncompetitively inhibit NMDA receptor activation in the CNS (Gordon et al. 1999; Graven-Nielsen et al. 2000; Henriksson and Sorensen 2002; Mathisen et al. 1995; Nikolajsen et al. 1996; Ren and Dubner 1999; Sessle 2000; Woolf and Thompson 1991). However, at the concentrations employed in this study, ketamine and dextromethorphan could also have decreased glutamate-evoked afferent discharges through nonspecific mechanisms, such as sodium or calcium channel blockade (Brau et al. 1997; Netzer et al. 1993). It was found that 10 mM concentrations of ketamine had no significant effect on hypertonic saline-evoked afferent discharges, which suggests that ketamine's inhibitory actions are selective for glutamate-evoked afferent discharge and therefore unlikely to be mediated through nonspecific mechanisms. In contrast, dextromethorphan, which is a relatively weak NMDA receptor antagonist (Church et al. 1994; Netzer et al. 1993), significantly suppressed hypertonic saline-evoked afferent discharges at concentrations required to suppress glutamate-evoked afferent discharges, which suggests that part of the inhibitory effect of dextromethorphan was likely due to a nonspecific mechanism. Because 10 mM ketamine selectively inhibited glutamate-evoked afferent discharges in rats, this concentration of ketamine was employed in the parallel human experimental pain studies. In human subjects, 10 mM ketamine was found to also significantly attenuate glutamate-evoked muscle pain intensity. However, 10 mM ketamine did not significantly affect hypertonic saline-evoked muscle pain intensity or masseter muscle pressure pain thresholds, which indicates that systemic or local nonspecific effects ketamine did not contribute to its attenuation of glutamate-evoked muscle pain in human subjects. Taken together, these findings suggest that ketamine attenuates glutamate-evoked muscle pain intensity through blockade of peripheral NMDA receptors.
Although CNS actions of glutamate are well known and its role in pain well documented (see preceding text), deep-tissue pain in humans has also been associated with a local elevation in glutamate levels in peripheral tissues. In patients suffering from inflamed knee joints, an association has been made between pain and elevated glutamate concentrations in synovial fluid (McNearney et al. 2000). Calf muscle pain provoked by additional flexions of the foot after prolonged eccentric contractions of the calf muscles has also been associated with increased glutamate levels in these muscles (Tegeder et al. 2002). Glutamate levels are also elevated in the patellar tendon tissues of subjects suffering from "Jumpers knee," a noninflammatory knee pain that can develop in athletes who exert very high tensional forces on their knees, such as weightlifters (Alfredson and Lorentzon 2002; Alfredson et al. 2001). NMDA receptors have been identified in association with nerve structures in the patellar tendon in humans (Alfredson et al. 2001) as well as in cutaneous and deep tissues in association with nerve fibers in several animal studies (Carlton and Coggeshall 1999; Carlton et al. 1995; McRoberts et al. 2001; Sahara et al. 1997; Sato et al. 1993). In the present study, the concentration of glutamate injected into the masseter muscle to evoke afferent discharges or induce muscle pain through peripheral NMDA receptor activation approximates the concentration of glutamate that could be released on afferent excitation from presynaptic vesicles in masseter muscle afferent fiber terminals (Riveros et al. 1986). It is therefore possible that under conditions that are associated with deep tissue pain, glutamate may be released from afferent fiber terminals and act on peripheral NMDA receptors to excite nociceptive fibers.
The masseter muscle was used in the current study to investigate peripheral NMDA receptor involvement because it is a common site of myofascial pain, especially in temporomandibular disorders (Drangsholt and LeResche 1999; Dworkin and LeResche 1992; Stohler 1999). Temporomandibular disorders embrace a number of painful conditions in deep craniofacial tissues and are one of the least understood yet most common conditions associated with pain and tenderness in the masticatory muscles (Drangsholt and LeResche 1999; Dworkin and LeResche 1992). Curiously, most temporomandibular disorders appear to lack demonstrable joint or masseter muscle tissue abnormalities (Stohler 1999), and so it is noteworthy that glutamate injection into deep craniofacial tissues does not result in gross signs of inflammation (Fiorentino et al. 1999) but does cause both muscle pain and a more prolonged period (>30 min) of mechanical sensitization, symptoms similar to those of temporomandibular disorders patients (Cairns et al. 2001a, 2002; Svensson et al. 2003). These new findings point to the possibility that activation of peripheral NMDA receptors by elevated muscle glutamate levels may contribute to masticatory muscle pain and that peripherally acting NMDA receptor antagonists could prove to be effective analgesics for this type of pain.
We have consistently found that glutamate evokes greater cumulative afferent discharges in female than in male rats (Cairns et al. 2001a, 2002). There is evidence that the female sex hormone estrogen increases the amplitude of NMDA-receptor mediated excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the hippocampus by enhancing the function of the NMDA receptor (Bi et al. 2000; Foy et al. 1999). Thus there is a theoretical basis for a sex-related difference in the efficacy and/or potency of NMDA receptor antagonists on peripheral NMDA receptors. However, in the current study, the effect of each concentration of the NMDA receptor antagonist was examined on only five afferent fibers from each sex, too few to permit statistical analysis of the potential influence of sex on the attenuation of glutamate-evoked afferent discharges by NMDA receptor antagonists in this study. Studies that examine the effect of NMDA receptor antagonists on larger numbers of masseter muscle afferent fibers recorded from male and female rats will be required to answer this question. Further, because the present study tested the effect of NMDA receptor antagonists on men and we have previously documented that injection of glutamate into the masseter muscle is more painful in women than in men (Cairns et al. 2001a, 2003b; Svensson et al. 2003), the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists needs to be tested in women in view of the high female predominance of temporomandibular disorders (Dao and LeResche 2000; Huang et al. 2002).
|
DISCLOSURES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. Arendt-Nielsen, Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D3, DK-9220, Denmark (E-mail: LAN{at}smi.auc.dk).
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONDISCLOSURESACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Alfredson H, Forsgren S, Thorsen K, and Lorentzon RJ. In vivo microdialysis and immunohistochemical analyses of tendon tissue demonstrated high amounts of free glutamate and glutamate NMDAR1 receptors, but no signs of inflammation, in Jumper's knee. Orthop Res 19: 881–886, 2001.
Bi R, Broutman G, Foy MR, Thompson RF, and Baudry M. The tyrosine kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediate multiple effects of estrogen in hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3602–3607, 2000.
Brau ME, Sander F, Vogel W, and Hempelmann G. Blocking mechanisms of ketamine and its enantiomers in enzymatically demyelinated peripheral nerve as revealed by single-channel experiments. Anesthesiology 86: 394–404, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
Cairns BE, Gambarota G, Dunning PS, Mulkern RV, and Berde CB. Activation of peripheral excitatory amino acid receptors decreases the duration of local anesthesia. Anesthesiology 98: 521–529, 2003a.[Web of Science][Medline]
Cairns BE, Gambarota G, Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, and Berde CB. Glutamate-induced sensitization of rat masseter muscle fibers. Neuroscience 109: 389–399, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Cairns BE, Hu JW, Arendt-Nielsen L, Sessle BJ, and Svensson P. Sex-related differences in human pain perception and rat afferent discharge evoked by injection of glutamate into the masseter muscle. J Neurophysiol 86: 782–791, 2001a.
Cairns BE, Sessle BJ, and Hu JW. Evidence that excitatory amino acid receptors within the temporomandibular joint region are involved in the reflex activation of the jaw muscles. J Neurosci 18: 8056–8064, 1998.
Cairns BE, Sessle BJ, and Hu JW. Characteristics of glutamate-evoked temporomandibular joint afferent activity in the rat. J Neurophysiol 85: 2446–2454, 2001b.
Cairns BE, Sessle BJ, and Hu JW. Temporomandibular-evoked jaw muscle reflex: role of brain stem NMDA and non-NMDA receptors. Neuroreport 12: 1875–1878, 2001c.[Web of Science][Medline]
Cairns BE, Wang K, Hu JW, Sessle BJ, Arendt-Nielsen L, and Svensson P. The effect of glutamate-evoked masseter muscle pain on the human jaw-stretch reflex differs in men and women. J Orofacial Pain In press.
Carlton SM and Coggeshall RE. Inflammation-induced changes in peripheral glutamate receptor populations. Brain Res 820: 63–70, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
Carlton SM, Hargett GL, and Coggeshall RE. Localization and activation of glutamate receptors in unmyelinated axons of rat glabrous skin. Neurosci Lett 197: 25–28, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
Carlton SM, McNearney T, and Cairns BE. Peripheral glutamate receptors: Novel targets for Analgesics? In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Pain, edited by Dostrovsky JO, Carr DB, and Koltzenburg M. Seattle, WA: IASP, 2003, p. 125–139.
Church J, Sawyer D, and McLarnon JG. Interactions of dextromethorphan with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-channel complex: single channel recordings. Brain Res 666: 189–194, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
Dao TTT and LeResche L. Gender differences in pain. J Orofac Pain 14: 169–184, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
Drangsholt M and LeResche L. Temporomandibular disorder pain. In: Epidemiology of Pain, edited by Von Korff M. Seattle, WA: IASP, 1999, p. 497–506.
Dworkin SF and LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 6: 301–355, 1992.[Medline]
Fiorentino PM, Cairns BE, and Hu JW. Development of inflammation after application of mustard oil or glutamate to the rat temporomandibular joint. Arch Oral Biol 44: 27–32, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
Foy MR, Xu J, Xie X, Brinton RD, Thompson RF, and Berger TW. 17
-estradiol enhances NMDA receptor-mediated EPSPs and long-term potentiation. J Neurophysiol 81: 925–929, 1999.
Garland A, Jordan JE, Necheles J, Alger LE, Scully MM, Miller RJ, Ray DW, White SR, and Solway J. Hypertonicity, but not hypothermia, elicits substance P release from rat C-fiber neurons in primary culture. J Clin Invest 95: 2359–2366, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gordon SM, Dubner R, and Dionne RA. Antihyperalgesic effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan in the oral surgery model. J Clin Pharmacol 39: 139–146, 1999.[Abstract]
Graven-Nielsen T, Aspegren Kendall S, Henriksson KG, Bengtsson M, Sorensen J, Johnson A, Gerdle B, and Arendt-Nielsen L. Ketamine reduces muscle pain, temporal summation, and referred pain in fibromyalgia patients. Pain 85: 483–491, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
Henriksson KG and Sorensen J. The promise of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 28: 343–351, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hollmann MW, Liu HT, Hoenemann CW, Liu WH, and Durieux ME. Modulation of NMDA receptor function by ketamine and magnesium. II. Interactions with volatile anesthetics. Anesth Analg 92: 1182–1191, 2001.
Huang GJ, LeResche L, Critchlow CW, Martin MD, and Drangsholt MT. Risk factors for diagnostic subgroups of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD). J Dent Res 81: 284–288, 2002.
Lawand NB, Willis WD, and Westlund KN. Excitatory amino acid receptor involvement in peripheral nociceptive transmission in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 324: 169–177, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mathisen LC, Skjelbred P, Skoglund LA, and Oye I. Effect of ketamine, an NMDA receptor inhibitor, in acute and chronic orofacial pain. Pain 61: 215–220, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
McNearney T, Speegle D, Lawand N, Lisse J, and Westlund KN. Excitatory amino acid profiles of synovial fluid from patients with arthritis. J Rheumatol 27: 739–745, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
McRoberts JA, Coutinho SV, Marvizon JC, Grady EF, Tognetto M, Sengupta JN, Ennes HS, Chaban VV, Amadesi S, Creminon C, Lanthorn T, Geppetti P, Bunnett NW, and Mayer EA. Role of peripheral N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in visceral nociception in rats. Gastroenterology 120: 1737–1748, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ming Z, Griffith BL, Breese GR, Mueller RA, and Criswell HE. Changes in the effect of isoflurane on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid-gated currents in cultured cerebral cortical neurons with time in culture: evidence for subunit specificity. Anesthesiology 97: 856–867, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Netzer R, Pflimlin P, and Trube G. Dextromethorphan blocks N-methyl-D-aspartate induced currents and voltage-operated inward currents in cultured cortical neurons. Eur J Pharmacol 238: 209–216, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
Nikolajsen L, Hansen CL, Nielsen J, Keller J, Arendt-Nielsen L, and Jensen TS. The effect of ketamine on phantom pain: a central neuropathic disorder maintained by peripheral input. Pain 67: 69–77, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
Nishikawa K and MacIver MB. Excitatory synaptic transmission mediated by NMDA receptors is more sensitive to isoflurane than are non-NMDA receptor-mediated responses. Anesthesiology 92: 228–236, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ren K and Dubner R. Central nervous system plasticity and persistent pain. J Orofac Pain 13: 155–163, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
Riveros N, Fiedler J, Lagos N, Munoz C, and Orrego F. Glutamate in rat brain cortex synaptic vesicles: influence of the vesicle isolation procedure. Brain Res 386: 405–408, 1986.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sahara Y, Noro N, Iida Y, Soma K, and Nakamura Y. Glutamate receptor subunits GluR5 and KA-2 are co-expressed in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. J Neurosci 17: 6611–6625, 1997.
Sato K, Kiyama H, Park H, and Tohyama M. AMPA, KA and NMDA receptors are expressed in the rat DRG neurons. Neuroreport 4: 1263–1265, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
Schaible HG, Ebersberger A, and Von Banchet GS. Mechanisms of pain in arthritis. Ann NY Acad Sci 966: 343–354, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Schumacher MA, Jong BE, Frey SL, Sudanagunta SP, Capra NF, and Levine JD. The stretch-inactivated channel, a vanilloid receptor variant, is expressed in small-diameter sensory neurons in the rat. Neurosci Lett 287: 215–218, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sessle BJ. Acute and chronic craniofacial pain: brainstem mechanisms of nociceptive transmission and neuroplasticity, and their clinical correlates. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11: 57–91, 2000.
Stohler CS. Muscle-related temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 13: 273–284, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
Svensson P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Nielsen H, and Larsen JK. Effect of chronic and experimental jaw muscle pain on pain-pressure thresholds and stimulus-response curves. J Orofac Pain 9: 347–356, 1995.[Medline]
Svensson P, Cairns BE, Wang K, Hu JW, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L, and Sessle BJ. Glutamate-evoked pain and mechanical allodynia in the human masseter muscle. Pain 101: 221–227, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
Svensson P, De Laat A, Graven-Nielsen T, and Arendt-Nielsen L. Experimental jaw-muscle pain does not change heteronymous H-reflexes in the human temporalis muscle. Exp Brain Res 121: 311–318, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
Tegeder L, Zimmermann J, Meller ST, and Geisslinger G. Release of algesic substances in human experimental muscle pain. Inflamm Res 51: 393–402, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Woolf CJ and Thompson SW. The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation; implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain 44: 293–299, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
You HJ, Chen J, Morch CD, and Arendt-Nielsen L. Differential effect of peripheral glutamate (NMDA, non-NMDA) receptor antagonists on bee venom-induced spontaneous nociception and sensitization. Brain Res Bull 58: 561–567, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Dessem, M. Moritani, and R. Ambalavanar Nociceptive Craniofacial Muscle Primary Afferent Neurons Synapse in Both the Rostral and Caudal Brain Stem J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 214 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S. Bondok and A. M. Abd El-Hady Intra-articular magnesium is effective for postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic knee surgery Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 389 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. J. L. McCartney, A. Sinha, and J. Katz A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Role of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists in Preventive Analgesia Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1385 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
, female rat; 
, male rat.
, the median cumulative afferent activity evoked by injection of 0.5 (n = 10), 5 (n = 10), 50 (n = 14), and 500 (n = 10) mM NMDA. 
, the median cumulative discharges in response to injection of 500 mM glutamate into the masseter muscle (n = 102). Afferent discharges evoked by 500 mM NMDA were significantly greater that those evoked by 0.5 or 5 mM NMDA. Note that afferent discharges evoked by injection of 5, 50, or 500 mM NMDA into the masseter muscle were not significantly different from that evoked by 500 mM glutamate. Error bars: interquartile range, *,# P < 0.05 ANOVA on ranks, Dunn's test compared with 500 mM glutamate and 500 mM NMDA, respectively.
