|
|
||||||||
REPORT
Departments of 1Surgery and 2Medical Imaging, University of Toronto; and 3Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
Submitted 28 January 2004; accepted in final form 17 March 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Classically, the spinothalamic tract has been associated with pain and temperature sensation. Although specific heat- and cold-sensitive receptors have been identified (Craig 2002
; McKemy et al. 2002
; Reid and Flonta 2001
), the cortical mechanisms underlying thermal sensation remain illusive. Previous imaging studies of thermal sensations have reported several cortical areas of activation, including the insula, evoked by innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli (Craig 2002
; Craig et al. 2000
; Iannetti et al. 2003
; Peyron et al. 2000
). However, the perceptual response to a thermal stimulus can vary across subjects. For instance, an intense cold stimulus can evoke many sensations including cold, pain, prickle, and paradoxically heat, each with a characteristic temporal signature (Davis and Pope 2002
). Therefore a powerful approach to imaging brain activity related to sensations requires on-line information about evoked perceptions during the imaging experiment. This approach has been used previously to study emotions (Breiter et al. 1997
). We adopted this approach to isolate central correlates of cold-evoked sensations with unique temporal signatures (Davis et al. 2002
). In our previous study, percept-related functional MRI (fMRI) detected cortical responses associated with the perception of prickle. In the present study, we used percept-related fMRI to identify cortical responses tightly linked to the experience of PH. We now report that activity within a region of the insular cortex is tightly linked to the experience of PH.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All subjects gave informed written consent to experimental procedures approved by the University Health Network research ethics board. Because cold-evoked PH sensation varies across individuals, a group of 28 normal healthy potential subjects (15 male, 13 female; 2161 yr old) were prescreened for consistently experienced cold-evoked heat sensations. From this group, 10 right handed normal healthy subjects (5 male, 5 female; 2142 yr) were selected. Four of these subjects participated in a previous study of cold-evoked prickle (Davis et al. 2002
).
Thermal stimulation and ratings
A contact thermal stimulator (20 x 25 cm probe, TSA 2001, Medoc) was used to deliver cold stimuli to the thenar eminence of the right hand. The temperature of the probe was held at 32°C for 40 s between each of five cold stimuli. During each period of stimulation, the probe temperature was cooled to 3°C at 0.5°C/s, held at 3°C for 10 s, and then returned to 32°C at 10°C/s. Subjects used a trackball to rate heat sensations on a visually presented 100-point scale. Only very small (<10 mm) movements of the trackball with the left index finger were necessary to register the ratings.
Imaging and analysis
Whole brain images were obtained on a 1.5-T Signa Echospeed MRI (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) system. Anatomical images were acquired for each subject using a T1-weighted gradient echo high-resolution three-dimensional anatomic scan (TE = 5 ms, TR = 25 ms, flip = 45°, 124 1.5-mm-thick slices, 256 x 256 matrix, 24 x 24 cm field of view). Functional images were acquired using a T2*-weighted scan (25 contiguous 4-mm slices, single-shot spiral trajectory through k-space, flip angle = 85°, TR = 2,000 ms, TE = 40 ms, 64 x 64 matrix, 20 x 20 cm field of view) (Glover and Lai 1998
). Each functional run consisted of 333 volumes, the first 3 of which were discarded for signal equilibration.
Data were analyzed with BrainVoyager v4.94 (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, Netherlands) as previously described (Davis et al. 2002
). Briefly, preprocessing included trilinear interpolation to 1 x 1 x 1-mm resolution, slice acquisition time correction, motion correction, and also linear trend removal, high-pass filtering to attenuate frequencies <0.003 Hz (periods >330 s), spatial smoothing with a 6-mm-diam full-width half-maximum Gaussian kernel, and adjustment for temporal autocorrelation. Functional and anatomical images were co-registered and transformed into Talairach space (Talairach and Tournoux 1988
).
The maximum value of the heat rating was taken within each 2-s fMRI data frame. The resulting heat rating curves were convolved with a standard Brain Voyager hemodynamic response function and entered into a general linear model (GLM). To identify activations that were common to all subjects, a conjunction analysis was performed. The conjunction analysis makes a single subject GLM for each subject then takes the minimum t value at each voxel. We calculated a statistical threshold using the following procedure. Alphasim (B. Douglas Ward, Biophysics Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin) was used to create Monte-Carlo simulations of our particular scanning and processing protocol. These simulations verified that for the final map, an image-wide (across voxels), conjoint (across subjects) P value of <0.05 could be achieved by using a voxel-wise threshold P value of 0.0001 and cluster size threshold of 140 mm3. Therefore the resulting map was thresholded at these parameters (i.e., voxel-wise P value threshold of 0.0001 and cluster size threshold of 140 mm3). We have successfully used this approach, combining threshold and cluster size previously (Davis et al. 2002
; Downar et al. 2002
, 2003
).
Maps of motor-related activations due to trackball movement were constructed as described previously (Davis et al. 2002
). In general, we used the first derivative of the heat ratings curve in each subject as a quantitative measure of trackball movement since this represents the velocity of the trackball. Because similar brain regions are likely involved in generating both upward and downward finger movements, we took the absolute value of this velocity curve. The maximum value of the velocity curve was taken within each 2-s fMRI data frame. The velocity curves were then convolved, and entered into a GLM as individual predictor curves. Autocorrelation was measured and removed, and the GLM was submitted to the same conjunction analysis (and the same thresholds) used for the original heat ratings data.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
12°C, followed by a clear period of activation at and just after the thermode temperature was returned to neutral (Fig. 3).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings are consistent with the recent report of an evoked warm sensation during electrical stimulation of this region in an epilepsy patient surgery (Ostrowsky et al. 2002
). Laser heat-evoked potentials have also been localized close to this insular region during excitation of C warm receptors (Iannetti et al. 2003
) that produce warm sensations. Our findings are also consistent with the insula activation evoked by warm and noxious thermal contact stimulation (Craig et al. 1996
; Strupp 1996
), including the heat-evoked ipsilateral insula/frontal opercular response reported by Coghill et al. (1999)
. However, previous studies should be interpreted cautiously because they typically identify activations related to periods of stimulation during which there may have been mixed qualities of sensation. Given that the insula is composed of a variety of subregions, each of which may subserve different sensory functions, we also tested whether this region was active during other levels of the cooling stimulus. The interesting insular response (see Fig. 3) may impact on previous imaging studies of thermal stimulation-evoked responses (e.g., Coghill et al. 1999
; Craig et al. 2000
; Davis et al. 1998
). For instance, the long duration of PET scans may preclude distinguishing whether a cold-evoked response occurred when subjects perceived cold or heat. Furthermore, until now, subjects have not been asked to report PH during cold stimulation.
The occurrence of PH sensations has puzzled basic scientists and clinicians despite efforts to try to understand its etiology. Several studies have shown that when A-fiber conduction is temporarily blocked, a cold stimulus feels hot (Davis 1998
; Fruhstorfer 1984
; Fruhstorfer et al. 2003
; Mackenzie et al. 1975
; Wahren et al. 1989
). Patients with either compromised myelinated function or central abnormalities also experience PH sensations (Berglund et al. 2002
; Hansen et al. 1996
; Ochoa and Yarnitsky 1994
; Yosipovitch et al. 1995
). These findings led to the hypothesis that unmyelinated primary afferent fibers and central components of the heat pathway play a critical role in PH (Fruhstorfer 1984
; Fruhstorfer et al. 2003
; Hamalainen et al. 1982
; Hansen et al. 1996
; Mackenzie et al. 1975
; Susser et al. 1999
; Wahren et al. 1989
; Yarnitsky and Ochoa 1991
). A related phenomenon, the thermal grill illusion, is a perception of burning created by alternating strips of cool and warm stimuli. A region of the insula, not dissimilar to the region reported here, was also activated during this perceptual experience (Craig et al. 1996
).
The lateralization of the PH response to the right insula is interesting in light of several recent lines of study. Craig (2002
, 2003
) and Critchley et al. (2004)
have highlighted the role of the right insula in interoception and "subjective feeling states." Other studies have linked the right insula to aspects of attention, awareness, and salience (Downar et al. 2000
, 2002
). Therefore it is important to note that the PH percept inherently draws ones attention to the PH feeling and that the percept seems to arise somewhat deeply.
Most imaging studies of pain- and thermal-related brain responses employ the general linear model to identify activations that occur "on average" across all subjects. Such imaging studies typically list many cortical areas (including the insula) activated during pain or thermal stimulation (for review, see Peyron et al. 2000
). One possible confound in this approach is the possibility of a large contribution to the average from a subset of subjects (Friston et al. 1999
). Therefore our use of a conjunction analysis that imposes the criterion that the activation must be significant in each and every subject ensured that the insula activation was a key region for PH perception in all our subjects. This finding strongly supports our supposition that the insula is a critical component for PH perception. The cool-related decrease in activity in this region may serve to sharpen or amplify the effect of the temperature reversal, even though it never actually reaches the hot range. Therefore the behavior of the insula during the cold stimulation indicate that it is not simply a general thermal detection area but has a more complex and perhaps specific role in heat perception.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. D. Davis, Toronto Western Hospital, MP14-306, 399 Bathurst St., Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada (E-mail: kdavis{at}uhnres.utoronto.ca).
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Berglund B, Harju EL, Kosek E, and Lindblom U. Quantitative and qualitative perceptual analysis of cold dysesthesia and hyperalgesia in fibromyalgia. Pain 96: 177187, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Breiter HC, Gollub RL, Weisskoff RM, Kennedy DN, Makris N, Berke JD, Goodman JM, Kantor HL, Gastfriend DR, Riorden JP, Mathew RT, Rosen BR, and Hyman SE. Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion. Neuron 19: 591611, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Coghill RC, Sang CN, Maisog JM, and Iadarola MJ. Pain intensity processing within the human brain: a bilateral, distributed mechanism. J Neurophysiol 82: 19341943, 1999.
Craig AD. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 655666, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
Craig ADB. A new view of pain as a homeostatic emotion. Trends Neurosci 26: 303307, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Craig AD, Chen K, Bandy D, and Reiman EM. Thermosensory activation of insular cortex. Nat Neurosci 3: 184190, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Craig AD, Reiman EM, Evans A, and Bushnell MC. Functional imaging of an illusion of pain. Nature 384: 258260, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, and Dolan RJ. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci 7: 189195, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Davis KD. Cold-induced pain and prickle in the glabrous and hairy skin. Pain 75: 4757, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Davis KD, Kwan CL, Crawley AP, and Mikulis DJ. Functional MRI study of thalamic and cortical activations evoked by cutaneous heat, cold and tactile stimuli. J Neurophysiol 80: 15331546, 1998.
Davis KD and Pope GE. Noxious cold evokes multiple sensations with distinct time courses. Pain 98: 179185, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Davis KD, Pope GE, Crawley AP, and Mikulis DJ. Neural correlates of prickle sensation: a percept-related fMRI study. Nat Neurosci 5: 11211122, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, and Davis KD. A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nat Neurosci 3: 277283, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, and Davis KD. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J Neurophysiol 87: 615620, 2002.
Downar J, Mikulis DJ, and Davis KD. Neural correlates of the prolonged salience of painful stimulation. Neuroimage 20: 15401551, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, and Worsley KJ. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 10: 385396, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fruhstorfer H. Thermal sensibility changes during ischemic nerve block. Pain 20: 355361, 1984.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fruhstorfer H, Harju EL, and Lindblom UF. The significance of A-delta and C fibers for the perception of synthetic heat. Eur J Pain 7: 6371, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Glover GH and Lai S. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Magn Reson Med 39: 361368, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
Hamalainen H, Vartiainen M, Karvanen L, and Jarvilehto T. Paradoxical heat sensations during moderate cooling of the skin. Brain Res 251: 7781, 1982.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Hansen C, Hopf HC, and Treede RD. Paradoxical heat sensation in patients with multiple sclerosisevidence for a supraspinal integration of temperature sensation. Brain 119: 17291736, 1996.
Harrison JLK and Davis KD. Cold-evoked pain varies with skin type and cooling rate: a psychophysical study in humans. Pain 83: 123135, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Iannetti GD, Truini A, Romaniello A, Galeotti F, Rizzo C, Manfredi M, and Cruccu G. Evidence of a specific spinal pathway for the sense of warmth in humans. J Neurophysiol 89: 562570, 2003.
Mackenzie RA, Burke D, Skuse NF, and Lethlean AK. Fiber function and perception during cutaneous nerve block. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38: 865873, 1975.
McKemy DD, Neuhausser WM, and Julius D. Identification of a cold receptor reveals a general role for TRP channels in thermosensation. Nature 416: 5258, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ochoa JL and Yarnitsky D. The triple cold syndrome. Cold hyperalgesia, cold hypoaesthesia and cold skin in peripheral nerve disease. Brain 117: 185197, 1994.
Ostrowsky K, Magnin M, Ryvlin P, Isnard J, Guenot M, and Mauguiere F. Representation of pain and somatic sensation in the human insula: a study of responses to direct electrical cortical stimulation. Cereb Cortex 12: 376385, 2002.
Peyron R, Laurent B, and Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis. Neurophysiol Clin 30: 263288, 2000.[ISI][Medline]
Reid G and Flonta ML. Physiologycold current in thermoreceptive neurons. Nature 413: 480, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
Strupp JP. Stimulate: a GUI based fmri analysis software package. Neuroimage (Abstract) 3: S607, 1996.[CrossRef]
Susser E, Sprecher E, and Yarnitsky D. Paradoxical heat sensation in healthy subjects: peripherally conducted by A
or C fibers? Brain 122: 239246, 1999.
Talairach J and Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1988, p. 1122.
Wahren LK, Torebjörk E, and Jörum E. Central suppression of cold-induced C fiber pain by myelinated fibrr input. Pain 38: 313319, 1989.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Yarnitsky D and Ochoa JL. Warm and cold specific somatosensory systems. Psychophysical thresholds, reaction times and peripheral conduction velocities. Brain 114: 18191826, 1991.
Yosipovitch G, Yarnitsky D, Mermelstein V, Sprecher E, Reiss J, Witenberg C, Hemli JA, and Boner G. Paradoxical heat sensation in uremic polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 18: 768771, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L. Kwan, N. E. Diamant, G. Pope, K. Mikula, D. J. Mikulis, and K. D. Davis Abnormal forebrain activity in functional bowel disorder patients with chronic pain Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1268 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Hua, I. A. Strigo, L. C. Baxter, S. C. Johnson, and A. D. Craig Anteroposterior somatotopy of innocuous cooling activation focus in human dorsal posterior insular cortex Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): R319 - R325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |