| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Submitted 19 February 2004; accepted in final form 25 March 2004
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
-range (ca. 20 
80 Hz) synchronous oscillatory spike discharges. This phenomenon is assumed to be related to perceptual integration. Applying a planar multi-electrode array to the isolated frog retina, Ishikane et al. demonstrated that dimming detectors, off-sustained type ganglion cells, generate synchronous oscillatory spike discharges in response to diffuse dimming illumination. In the present study, applying the whole cell current-clamp technique to the isolated frog retina, we examined how light-evoked oscillatory spike discharges were generated in dimming detectors. Light-evoked oscillatory (30 Hz) spike discharges were triggered by rhythmic (30 Hz) fluctuations superimposed on a depolarizing plateau potential. When a suprathreshold steady depolarizing current was injected into a dimming detector, only a few spikes were evoked at the stimulus onset. However, repetitive spikes were triggered by a -range sinusoidal current superimposed on the steady depolarizing current. Thus the light-evoked rhythmic fluctuations are likely to be generated presynaptically. The light-evoked rhythmic fluctuations were suppressed not by intracellular application of N-(2,6-dimethyl-phenylcarbamoylmethyl)triethylammonium bromide (QX-314), a Na+ channel blocker, to the whole cell clamped dimming detector but by bath-application of tetrodotoxin to the retina. The light-evoked rhythmic fluctuations were suppressed by a GABAA receptor antagonist but potentiated by a GABAC receptor antagonist, whereas these fluctuations were little affected by a glycine receptor antagonist. Because amacrine cells are spiking neurons and because GABA is one of the main transmitters released from amacrine cells, amacrine cells may participate in generating rhythmically fluctuated synaptic input to dimming detectors. |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; Engel et al. 1990; Gray and Singer 1989; König et al. 1995; Ts'o and Gilbert 1988; Ts'o et al. 1986). The synchronized activity was frequently associated with -range (ca. 20 80 Hz) oscillatory spike discharges (Eckhorn et al. 1988; Engel et al. 1990; Gray and Singer 1989). It has been suggested that synchronous oscillations, which could establish dynamic relations among a cluster of neurons, may be a neuronal mechanism underlying perceptual integration (for review, see Singer and Gray 1995). Although several types of neuronal models have been proposed for synchronous oscillations (review; Jefferys et al. 1996; Ritz and Sejnowski 1997), critical experiments to evaluate these hypotheses seem to be hindered by technical difficulties and by anatomical complexity of cortical networks.
Retinal ganglion cells also generate synchronous oscillatory spike discharges (cat: Neuenschwander and Singer 1996; frog: Ishikane et al. 1999). The retina has the advantage of easier access to neurons in vitro and simpler anatomical structure than the visual cortex. In our previous study, light-evoked spike discharges were recorded from dimming detectors, off-sustained type ganglion cells, in the frog retina with a planar multi-electrode array (Ishikane et al. 1999). When the retina was stimulated with full-field, sinusoidally modulated illumination (temporal frequency at 0.25 Hz), synchronized spike discharges accompanied with oscillations (30 Hz) were detected even in cell pairs more than a few millimeters apart. The synchronized activities were decreased under the conditions where oscillatory spike discharges were suppressed. For example, the stimulated area was restricted to the receptive field size of dimming detectors (1 mm diam) or GABAA receptor antagonists were applied to the retina. These results suggest that oscillatory spike discharges may facilitate the establishment of synchrony among dimming detectors and that wide-range neural interactions may be essential for the oscillatory spike discharges in dimming detectors. However, the analysis of spike discharge patterns was not enough to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the oscillatory activities of dimming detectors.
In the present study, we applied the whole cell current-clamp technique to dimming detectors in the isolated frog retina and recorded the membrane potential changes induced by light stimulation and current injection. It was found that dimming detectors did not have intrinsic properties to generate oscillations but received rhythmically fluctuated synaptic input that triggered oscillatory spike discharges. The presynaptic neuronal mechanism seems to include GABAergic and spiking neurons, probably amacrine cells. Part of the present work has been reported elsewhere in an abstract form (Arai et al. 2002, 2003).
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Procedures for making whole-mount retinal preparations were nearly identical to those previously described (Ishikane et al. 1999). In brief, a bullfrog (Rana catesbiana, body wt: 180 g), which had been dark-adapted overnight, was double-pithed and eyes were enucleated in a dark room in accordance with "A Manual for the Conduct of Animal Experiments in The University of Tokyo" and "Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animals in the Field of Physiological Sciences, The Physiological Society of Japan". Under the stereomicroscope equipped with infrared (IR) converters (Night Viewer C5100, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan), the cornea and lens were ablated and the vitreous humor was absorbed into a piece of paper. The eyecup was cut into a few pieces, and the retina was isolated carefully from the pigment epithelium in an oxygenated control external solution. Then the isolated retina was transferred into a recording chamber on the stage of a microscope equipped with IR differential interference optics (Eclipse E600FN, Nikon, Yokohama, Japan) and an IR-CCD camera (C2400-79H; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). The retina, the ganglion cell layer side up, was put on a sheet of transparent dialysis membrane (Spectra/Pro 7 MWCO: 50000; Spectrum Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, CA), which was stretched in the middle part of the recording chamber and held down with nylon fibers attached to a U-shaped platinum weight. The retina was superfused with oxygenated external solution not only from the ganglion cell side but also from the photoreceptor side through the dialysis membrane. Recordings were carried out in a light-tight Faraday cage at room temperature (25°C).
External solutions
The control external solution contained (in mM) 100 NaCl, 10 D-glucose, 2.5 KCl, 18 NaHCO3, 1 CaCl2, and 1.6 MgCl2 and 2 mg/l phenol red (242 mosM). The superfusate was continuously bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2 to keep the pH at 7.2 and was fed into the recording chamber (3 ml in volume) at a rate of 1.3 1.7 ml/min. In some experiments, we used another solution that consisted of (in mM) 93 NaCl, 10 D-glucose, 2.5 KCl, 25 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, and 1.6 MgCl2 and 2 mg/l phenol red (245 mosM). Because photoresponses of dimming detectors were similar in either external solution, data were pooled and analyzed together.
Pharmacological agents were added to the control external solution and were bath-applied. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) was purchased from Wako (Osaka, Japan). Picrotoxin and strychnine were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). L-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (L-AP4), (3-aminopropyl) (diethoxymethyl) phosphinic acid (CGP), (–)-bicuculline methochloride (bicuculline), D-(–)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (D-AP5), 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f] quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide (NBQX), and (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl) methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA) were from Tocris (Bristol, UK). Picrotoxin and NBQX were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for stock solutions. The final concentration of DMSO after dilution with the control external solution was always kept <0.1% (vol/vol).
Whole cell recordings
Patch pipettes for whole cell recordings were pulled with a horizontal puller (P97, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). The electrode resistance was 6 8 M
in the control external solution when pipette was filled with a pipette solution.
Two pipette solutions were used in the present study. Pipette solution A contained (in mM) 90 K-gluconate, 20 HEPES, 5 EGTA, 0.5 CaCl2, 5.5 MgCl2, 0.5 Na3GTP, and 5 Na2ATP and 0.8 mg/ml Lucifer yellow dipotassium salt (227 mosM). Pipette solution B contained (in mM) 92 K-gluconate, 20 HEPES, 5 EGTA, 0.5 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 3.5 MgSO4, 0.5: Na3GTP, and 5 Na2ATP and 0.8 mg/ml Lucifer yellow dipotassium salt (224 mosM). In the control external solution, ECl was calculated to be –56 and –77 mV in pipette solutions A and B, respectively. In some experiments, N-(2,6-dimethyl-phenylcarbamoylmethyl)triethylammonium bromide (QX-314), (5 or 10 mM) was added to the pipette solution to block Na+ channels intracellularly (Connors and Prince 1982). The pH was titrated to 7.2 with KOH. Liquid junction potential was corrected for all recordings.
The inner limiting membrane prevented a clear view of the array of ganglion cell bodies and the access of electrode tip to the cell surface. Therefore a small hole (100 µm diam) was pierced in the inner limiting membrane with two cleaning pipettes. One pipette was filled with the control external solution, and the other with a collagenase solution (0.5 1 mg/ml of collagenase dissolved in the control external solution). The solutions were ejected from the cleaning pipettes by a positive pressure, and each cleaning pipette attached to a micromanipulator was independently moved against the inner limiting membrane in the opposite direction.
Light-evoked responses were recorded in the current-clamp mode with EPC-9/2 (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany), which was controlled by the Pulse software (HEKA). The fast and slow capacitance components were mostly cancelled automatically. The membrane potential was low-pass filtered at an appropriate corner frequency (1 4 kHz), which was always set to one-fifth of the sampling frequency.
Light stimulation
The retina was illuminated from the photoreceptor side through the transparent dialysis membrane and a slide glass attached to the bottom of the recording chamber. A beam-slitter cube was placed under the condenser lens of the microscope. The diffuser, lenses, and ND filters were put between the beam-slitter cube and a light-emitting diode (LED, emission maximum at 530 nm). The illuminated area was 7 mm in diameter and was large enough to cover the entire retinal preparation.
Two types of light stimulation were used; a sinusoidally modulated light (temporal frequency at 0.25 Hz) and a step light. The waveform of light stimulation was computer-controlled by changing the amount of the current supplied to the LED, which was driven in the range where the relationship between the supplied current and the light intensity (I) was linear. Appropriate ND filters were inserted into the light path to adjust the intensity of light stimulation. The mean intensity and contrast (Imax – Imin/Imax + Imin) of the sinusoidally modulated light ranged between 7.4 mlx and 1.5 klx, and between 0.55 and 0.87, respectively. Both values were optimally adjusted to evoke the oscillatory activities for each dimming detector every time when recordings were started. Before application of the sinusoidally modulated light, the retina was adapted to a background light (a constant current was supplied to the LED), the intensity of which was set to the mean value of the sinusoidally modulated light. The step light was applied with or without the background light.
Cell morphology
Cells were whole cell clamped with a patch pipette filled with the solution containing Lucifer yellow. Their morphology was visualized under epifluorescence illumination after the recording, and the images taken by a CCD camera (DXM1200; Nikon) were saved in a computer.
Cell identification and data analysis
Frog retinal ganglion cells are classified into at least four types based on their photoresponses; the dimming detector, the moving-edge detector, the contrast detector, and the convexity detector (Lettvin et al. 1959). It has been reported that the dimming detector has a larger soma (>20 µm diam) than the other types (10 µm diam) (Kock et al. 1989; Stirling and Merrill 1987). Thus we searched for a cell with a large soma in the ganglion cell layer and recorded photoresponses in the whole cell current-clamp mode.
When a step light was applied to the retina, a majority of large ganglion cells generated a few or no on-transient spike discharges with a hyperpolarization and off-sustained spike discharges with a large depolarization. These ganglion cells had similar morphological and physiological properties and thus were identified as dimming detectors (see RESULTS). In a few ganglion cells with a large cell body, the step light induced on-transient spike discharges without hyperpolarization and off-sustained spike discharges with a moderate depolarization. These ganglion cells responded with repetitive firings to current injection and had bi-stratified dendritic fields. Thus these cells were not classified as dimming detectors, and their data were not included for the present analysis. Some large ganglion cells that showed on-off transient spike discharges to the step light were classified into other cell types and their data were discarded.
The data obtained from dimming detectors were analyzed off-line with the Igor Pro software (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswergo, OR). Pooled data were expressed as means ± SE. Statistical difference was assessed with two-tailed, paired and unpaired Student's t-test as appropriate, with P < 0.01 considered significant.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
An example of dimming detectors filled with Lucifer yellow is shown in Fig. 1, A and B. Because an axon was always observed between the ganglion cell layer and the inner limiting membrane (Fig. 1B), the cell could be easily identified as a ganglion cell but not a displaced amacrine cell, which has no axon. The cell body of dimming detectors was 33.4 ± 1.5 µm in diameter (n = 23, Fig. 1A). As the focusing plane of the objective lens was advanced from the ganglion cell layer toward the inner nuclear layer, three to five thick dendrites extended downward from the soma and then branched out into the inner plexiform layer (IPL) near the amacrine cell layer [sublamina a, where off type neurons make synaptic contacts (Famiglietti et al. 1977)]. Dye coupling with neighboring cells was not observed. The dendritic field was >700 µm in diameter.
|
|
To investigate the temporal properties of light-evoked spike discharges in dimming detectors, the retina was stimulated with a full-field diffuse light, the intensity of which was sinusoidally modulated at the temporal frequency of 0.25 Hz. It has been reported that this stimulus frequency generates oscillatory spike discharges most efficiently in frog dimming detectors (Ishikane et al. 1999). When a background light was turned on, the membrane potential was slightly hyperpolarized and then gradually returned to the resting level in the dark. As the light intensity was sinusoidally modulated, the dimming detector hyperpolarized during the rising phase of the light stimulus, and then depolarized during its decay phase (Fig. 2A, top). On top of the depolarizing plateau, spikes with a regular interval (box b) were generated following a burst of spikes (box a). The interspike interval was variable during the burst (Fig. 2A, middle, box a) and then became regular (Fig. 2A, bottom, box b).
Autocorrelograms were calculated from the spike trains during the bursting period (Fig. 2B1) and the regularly spiking period (Fig. 2B2), separately. The central peak at 0 time shift indicates the number of spikes generated during each period when the retina was stimulated by 30 consecutive trials (1 trial corresponded to 1-cycle stimulation at 0.25 Hz). Auto-correlation analysis of the spike train during the bursting period revealed the presence of two side peaks (at approximately ±15 ms), which corresponded to the bursting spikes (Fig. 2B1). Power spectral density (PSD) analysis of the autocorrelogram showed no peaks in the range (ca. 20 80 Hz) during the burst (Fig. 2D, thin line). On the other hand, a rhythmic or oscillatory firing pattern was clearly observed in the auto-correlogram calculated from the regularly spiking period (Fig. 2B2). Periodic peaks of spike coincidences occurred at approximately 35 ms intervals. PSD analysis revealed a peak at 30 Hz (26.5 ± 0.64 Hz, n = 21, Fig. 2D, thick line). This frequency is similar to that reported by Ishikane et al. (1999), who applied a planar multi-electrode array to the isolated frog retina to record spike discharges from dimming detectors.
Raw autocorrelograms (Fig. 2B, 1 and 2) include both stimulus and neural-connection dependent components (Perkel et al. 1967). To evaluate the stimulus-dependent component, a shuffled autocorrelogram was calculated from the regularly spiking period (Fig. 2C). The shuffled autocorrelogram was nearly flat and there were no clear peaks. This was also supported by PSD analysis (Fig. 2D, gray line). Thus the oscillatory pattern appeared in the raw autocorrelogram (Fig. 2B2) has a neural origin. Oscillations developed with a delay after the first spike appeared for each cycle of sinusoidal illumination.
Oscillations were observed irrespective of the type of pipette solutions. The calculated ECl was positive (–56 mV for pipette solution A) or negative (–77 mV for pipette solution B) to the resting potential (approximately –70 mV). Therefore oscillations observed in dimming detectors would not be directly related to the intracellular concentration of Cl–.
Rhythmic fluctuations of the membrane potential during dimming stimulation
To gain insight into the mechanism how oscillatory spike discharges were generated in dimming detectors, changes of the membrane potential during dimming illumination were examined closely. The bottom trace of Fig. 2A (box b) illustrates a temporally expanded waveform of the voltage response, where spikes were generated regularly (Fig. 2A, top, box b). Interspike intervals were usually 35 ms and sometimes twice or three-times as long as 35 ms. Spikes were triggered in a depolarizing phase of the membrane fluctuations. The membrane potential fluctuated rhythmically even when a failure of spike discharge occurred.
To examine the correlation between spike discharges and membrane potential fluctuations, the upward zero-crossing time of each spike was aligned to time 0 and the membrane potential was averaged in the range of ±120 ms (Fig. 2E, calculated from A, box b). This analysis demonstrates the presence of rhythmic fluctuations of the membrane potential, the frequency of which was close to that of spike discharges (30 Hz). The abrupt potential change around time 0 illustrates the averaged waveform of action potentials with overshoot, whereas the small spine-like waveforms around the top of each rhythmic depolarization are the reduced action potentials due to averaging of spikes evoked with a temporal jitter. Rhythmic fluctuations of the membrane potential probably caused oscillatory spike discharges in dimming detectors.
Effects of current injection to dimming detectors
Two possible origins of the rhythmic fluctuations can be imagined. The first possibility is that active membrane properties of dimming detectors may have the ability to generate the rhythmic fluctuations, which would be triggered by a signal such as sustained depolarization. It has been reported that some CNS neurons produce the oscillatory activities by their own active membrane properties (Bevan and Wilson 1999; Boehmer et al. 2000; Dossi et al. 1992; Gray and McCormick 1996; Llinás et al. 1991; Pedroarena and Llinás 1997). The second possibility is that dimming detectors may simply follow the rhythmic synaptic input, which would be generated in the distal layer(s) of the retina. It has been reported that network interaction produces oscillations in various CNS regions (Buhl et al. 1998; Eeckman and Freeman 1990; Sugai et al. 1999; Whittington et al. 1995).
To determine a possible source of the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors, we injected a depolarizing current into the soma of a dimming detector through a recording electrode (Fig. 3A) under the condition where most of chemical synaptic transmission in the retina had been blocked (D-AP5, NBQX, picrotoxin, strychnine and L-AP4 to block the transmission via NMDA receptors, non-NMDA receptors, GABA receptors, glycine receptors, and group III metabotropic glutamate receptors, respectively).
|
This experiment indicates that steady depolarization is not enough to generate oscillatory spike discharges intrinsically and that dimming detectors are able to induce spikes following the sinusoidal current inputs, resulting in oscillatory spike discharges. Therefore it is not likely that the active membrane properties of dimming detectors may be the origin of rhythmic fluctuations.
Contribution of Na+ channels to rhythmic fluctuations
Dimming detectors, similar to other ganglion cells, receive synaptic inputs from amacrine and bipolar cells. Ishikane et al. (1999) have shown that dimming detectors generate oscillatory spike discharges only when a retinal area much wider than the receptive field is stimulated with a dimming light. Because amacrine cells are assumed to contribute to lateral interaction in the inner retina, it is likely that amacrine cells may be involved in the system which generates the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors.
In the retina, the transmitter release from both photoreceptors and bipolar cells is regulated by graded potential changes without Na+ spikes (Werblin and Dowling 1969). However, amacrine cells, which receive synaptic inputs from bipolar and amacrine cells, generate Na+ spikes accompanied with graded potential changes in response to light stimulation. Thus some functions of amacrine cells may be suppressed by a Na+ channel blocker.
To clarify the effect of Na+ spike elimination from amacrine cells on the rhythmic fluctuations of dimming detectors, Na+ spikes of the whole cell clamped cell were blocked by intracellular application of QX-314 (5 or 10 mM) through a recording pipette in advance. Spikes disappeared soon after the whole cell mode was established, and thus the examined cell was identified as a dimming detector based on the properties of photoresponses (sustained hyperpolarization to light increment and sustained depolarization to light decrement) and morphology (the soma size and dendritic pattern revealed by Lucifer yellow staining; see Fig. 1, A and B).
Figure 4A is an example of photoresponses recorded from QX-314-filled dimming detectors. During the decay phase of sinusoidally modulated illumination, the dimming detector showed depolarization accompanied with obvious fluctuations of the membrane potential [Fig. 4A, top (box) and middle]. PSD analysis of the fluctuations revealed a peak at the frequency of 22 Hz (Fig. 4A, bottom), indicating the presence of the rhythm. The mean frequency of the rhythm was 28.0 ± 0.73 Hz (n = 31), which was not significantly different from that calculated from spike discharges of QX-314-free dimming detectors (26.5 ± 0.64 Hz, n = 21) (P = 0.149, 2-tailed, unpaired Student's t-test). When both Na+ and K+ conductances were blocked by introducing QX-314 and Cs+ into the whole cell clamped dimming detectors, the rhythmic fluctuations were evoked by light stimulation (n = 9, data not shown). Thus it is not likely that Na+ or K+ conductance of dimming detectors is essential for generating rhythmic fluctuations.
|
bipolar cell dimming detector was little affected by TTX. However, the fluctuations of the membrane potential during depolarization were obscured [Fig. 4B, top (box) and middle]. PSD analysis confirmed that the rhythmic fluctuations disappeared (Fig. 4B, bottom). After extensive washout of TTX, the rhythmic fluctuations recovered and a peak reappeared obviously 22 Hz in the power spectrum (Fig. 4C). When the power at the peak frequency of the rhythm in control solution was compared with that in the TTX solution, it was confirmed that TTX significantly suppressed the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors (0.189 ± 0.079 of control condition, n = 5; P < 0.01). This series of experiments indicates that Na+ spikes are essential for generating the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors. It is probable that Na+ spikes may originate from amacrine cells, which contribute to lateral interaction in the inner retina (see DISCUSSION).
Inhibitory synaptic transmission crucial for generating the rhythmic fluctuations
It has been proposed that inhibitory neurons may be involved in generating synchronous oscillatory spike discharges in CNS (for review, see Ritz and Sejnowski 1997). Because GABA and glycine are the major inhibitory transmitters released from amacrine cells (Kalloniatis et al. 1996), it is likely that GABA and/or glycine may participate in generating the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors. Actually, Ishikane et al. (1999) reported that oscillatory spike discharges of dimming detectors were totally suppressed by application of bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist. However, they recorded spike discharges from dimming detectors extracellularly with a planar multi-electrode array, and thus it is not obvious whether bicuculline suppressed the rhythmic fluctuations or not. Therefore we examined the effects of bicuculline on the light-evoked rhythmic fluctuations in QX-314-filled dimming detectors under the current clamp.
Bath-applied bicuculline (10 µM) reduced the rhythmic fluctuations (Fig. 5B) observed in control solution (Fig. 5A). PSD analysis revealed that the peak 30 Hz in control solution (Fig. 5A, bottom) disappeared in the presence of bicuculline (Fig. 5B, bottom). The effects of bicuculline partially recovered after washout (data not shown). Similar results were obtained from other five cells. These results suggest that GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission may be included in the system that generates the rhythm presynaptically (see DISCUSSION).
|
; Vitanova et al. 2001). To investigate whether GABAC receptors contribute to the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors, TPMPA (100 µM), a selective antagonist of GABAC receptors, was bath-applied to the retina (Fig. 5, C and D). In contrast to the suppressive effect of bicuculline, the rhythmic fluctuations during the depolarizing plateau were drastically enhanced by TPMPA (Fig. 5D). PSD analysis proved enormous enhancement of the rhythm (Fig. 5D, bottom). Similar effects were observed in other seven cells. When spike discharges were recorded from dimming detectors with a QX-314-free pipette, TPMPA decreased the number of spike failure for each rhythmic depolarization. Furthermore, doublets or triplets of spikes were frequently observed for each rhythmic depolarization (n = 3, data not shown).
Although the presence of GABAB receptors has not yet been demonstrated in the frog retina, we examined a possible contribution of GABAB receptors to the rhythmic fluctuations. When CGP (100 µM), a selective antagonist of GABAB receptors, was bath-applied, no significant changes were observed in the rhythmic fluctuations of QX-314-filled dimming detectors (n = 4, P = 0.349; Fig. 7).
|
30 Hz in the presence of strychnine (Fig. 6B, bottom), but the effect of strychnine was not statistically significant (n = 5, P = 0.179; Fig. 7). Therefore glycinergic amacrine cells may have little, if any, contribution to the system that generates the rhythm.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
30 Hz) spike discharges were triggered by rhythmic (30 Hz) fluctuations of the membrane potential superimposed on the depolarizing plateau, which was induced by diffuse dimming illumination (Fig. 2). Oscillatory spike discharges were not evoked by the injection of a steady depolarizing current into the soma of a dimming detector but were induced by the addition of sinusoidal current to the steady depolarizing current (Fig. 3). Blockade of Na+ channels in the retina by TTX suppressed the rhythmic fluctuations without affecting the basic light-evoked responses of dimming detectors (Fig. 4). Pharmacological experiments revealed the involvement of GABAergic synaptic transmission in generating the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors (Figs. 5–7). Contribution of amacrine cells to generation of the rhythmic fluctuations
The current injection experiment indicates that dimming detectors may not have the intrinsic ability to generate the rhythmic fluctuations (Fig. 3). The synaptic input to dimming detectors is likely to be rhythmic. The presynaptic mechanism that can generate the rhythm seems to be characterized by susceptibility to Na+ channel blockers and involvement of GABAAergic synaptic transmission.
Susceptibility to NA+ channel blockers. The rhythmic fluctuations of dimming detectors were not affected by the intracellular application of QX-314 but suppressed by the bath application of TTX (Fig. 4). Therefore Na+ spikes in presynaptic cells are essential for the generation of the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors.
The cells presynaptic to dimming detectors are bipolar and amacrine cells. Recently it was reported that subsets of bipolar cells had TTX-sensitive Na+ channels (rat: Pan and Hu 2000; goldfish: Zenisek et al. 2001). However, these Na+ channels were mainly localized to the dendrite and soma of bipolar cells, and only a few Na+ channels were located at the axon terminal. Thus Na+ channels of bipolar cells may not contribute to the signal processing in the inner retina but may be used to amplify the signal from photoreceptors (Pan and Hu 2000; Zenisek et al. 2001). It is well accepted that amacrine cells generate Na+ spikes (Barnes and Werblin 1986). Na+ spikes can conduct along the dendrites of amacrine cells with less attenuation than the graded potential, resulting in the establishment of wide-range interaction in the inner retina (Shields and Lukasiewicz 2003).
Involvement of GABAAergic synaptic transmission.
The rhythmic fluctuations of dimming detectors were suppressed by bicuculline but not by strychnine (Figs. 5 and 6). Vitanova et al. (2001) have shown that GABAA receptors mainly distribute in the inner plexiform layer of the frog retina, where amacrine cells make synapses. The release of GABA from amacrine cells is triggered by Na+ spikes (goldfish: Watanabe et al. 2000; tiger salamander: Shields and Lukasiewicz 2003). Therefore GABAergic amacrine cells are likely to play an important role in the network that generates the rhythm in the inner retina. This hypothesis is compatible with the observation that oscillatory potentials of local electroretinogram to a flash light are originated from the inner plexiform layer of the mudpuppy retina (Wachtmeister and Dowling 1978).
One may imagine that dimming detectors receive direct rhythmic GABAAergic input from amacrine cells and that the GABAAergic transmission does not participate in generating the rhythm per se. However, the rhythmic activities of dimming detectors were not affected by the concentration of Cl– in the pipette solution although the calculated ECl was different between the pipette solutions A (–56 mV) and B (–77 mV). If dimming detectors received direct rhythmic GABAAergic inputs, it would be difficult to detect the rhythmic fluctuations of dimming detectors when the pipette solution A was used for recordings because the light-evoked depolarizing plateau (approximately –60 mV, Fig. 1C) was close to ECl (–56 mV). Therefore it is likely that GABAAergic synaptic transmission may be involved in the presynaptic network that generates the rhythm.
Ishikane et al. (1999) have shown that wide-field dimming illumination is essential for the generation of synchronous oscillatory spike discharges among dimming detectors. A possible mechanism for the wide-range interaction would be the signal transmission via gap junctions. It has been reported in the cat and rabbit retinas that ganglion cells can interact with one another via gap junctions (Vaney 1991; Xin and Bloomfield 1997). However, in the present study, the dye coupling was not observed when dimming detectors were intracellularly stained with Lucifer yellow (Fig. 1). A preliminary experiment with neurobiotin has not yet been successful to show the tracer coupling. Even if gap junctions existed among dimming detectors, the pore size of gap junctions would be too small and the coupling ratio would be too low to contribute to the wide-range interaction and/or the generation of the rhythm, though we cannot deny a possible contribution of gap junctions among dimming detectors to the narrow-range synchronization (Brivanlou et al. 1998). On the other hand, amacrine cells in various species are known to make extensive gap junctions each other (for review, see Vaney 1994). Furthermore, wide-field amacrine cells are found in the frog retina (Vígh et al. 2000). Although circumstantial, these pieces of evidence (susceptibility to Na+ channel blockers, involvement of GABAAergic synaptic transmission, and wide-range interaction) suggest that amacrine cells may contribute to generating rhythmic input to dimming detectors.
Functions of GABAC receptors in the inner retina
Application of TPMPA drastically enhanced the amplitude (or power) of the rhythmic fluctuations but did not change obviously their frequency (Figs. 5 and 7). Thus GABAC receptor-mediated interactions may not participate in the system that regulates the frequency of the rhythm.
It has been suggested that the GABAC receptor-mediated negative feedback from amacrine cells to bipolar cells may be used to control the gain of glutamatergic transmission (tiger salamander: Dong and Werblin 1998; mouse: Matsui et al. 2001). GABAC receptors distribute mainly in the inner plexiform layer, especially at the axon terminal of bipolar cells (rat: Wässle et al. 1998; frog: Du and Yang 2000; frog and turtle: Vitanova et al. 2001). Therefore application of TPMPA probably increased the release of glutamate from bipolar cells in the frog retina (Figs. 5 and 7). This, in turn, would enhance the inhibitory feedback or feedforward activities of amacrine cells and/or the excitatory direct input to dimming detectors, resulting in the potentiation of the oscillatory activities of dimming detectors.
Models that may generate the rhythmic fluctuations in dimming detectors
Three types of neuronal models have been proposed for synchronous oscillations (for review, see Jefferys et al. 1996; Ritz and Sejnowski 1997). The first type includes a feedback loop between excitatory and inhibitory neurons (Eeckman and Freeman 1990). Because most bipolar and amacrine cells are assumed to be excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, and because bipolar cells make reciprocal synapses with amacrine cells (Dowling 1968; Dowling and Werblin 1969; Hartveit 1999), this type of model would be a neuronal base of oscillations in dimming detectors. In this case, the rhythm is produced locally at the axon terminal of bipolar cells, and thus gap junctions among amacrine cells would help to synchronize the locally generated rhythm (Deans et al. 2001; Traub et al. 2001).
The second type hypothesizes an inhibitory neuron that can induce oscillations by the intrinsic properties. Oscillator neurons (or chattering cells) can make a rhythm in the network (Gray and McCormick 1996). It has been reported that oscillatory membrane potentials were produced by injecting a sustained depolarizing current into GABAergic wide-field amacrine cells in the white bass retina (Solessio et al. 2002; Vigh et al. 2003). It is possible that some amacrine cells in the frog retina would produce the rhythm intrinsically and send their output to bipolar cells and/or amacrine cells.
The third type is composed of the network where inhibitory neurons are mutually connected. Oscillations are generated when the network receives tonic excitatory inputs (Whittington et al. 1995). It has been shown that retinal amacrine cells make inhibitory synapses each other (Dowling 1968; Roska et al. 1998; Watanabe et al. 2000). If the inhibitory network of amacrine cells received sustained excitatory inputs from bipolar cells, the network would generate the rhythm. Further studies are required to specify the neuronal basis of rhythm generation in the inner retina.
Functional significance of oscillations in dimming detectors
It has been suggested that the activities of dimming detectors in the frog retina are related to the escape behavior (Maturana et al., 1960). The large shadow of a big animal that moves toward a frog produces a large dark image on the frog retina. Applying a planar multi-electrode array to the retina isolated from frog, Ishikane et al. (1999) demonstrated that a large dimming stimulus evoked synchronous oscillatory spike discharges in a large cluster of dimming detectors, whereas small multiple dark spots failed to induce synchronous oscillations. Tachibana et al. (2003) showed that the stimulus pattern that induced synchronous oscillations in dimming detectors could trigger the escape behavior in frogs. However, it is not yet certain whether synchronization or oscillations is essential for triggering the escape behavior. Further studies are required to elucidate the functional significance of oscillations in dimming detectors.
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Tachibana, Dept. of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan (E-mail: Ltmasao{at}L.u-tokyo.ac.jp).
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Arai I, Du JL, Asaka T, and Tachibana M. The mechanism of the light-induced oscillatory spike discharges recorded from off-sustained ganglion cells in the frog retina (Abstract). Jpn J Physiol 52, Suppl: S142, 2002.
Barnes S and Werblin F. Gated currents generate single spike activity in amacrine cells of the tiger salamander retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 1509–1512, 1986.
Bevan MD and Wilson CJ. Mechanisms underlying spontaneous oscillation and rhythmic firing in rat subthalamic neurons. J Neurosci 19: 7617–7628, 1999.
Boehmer G, Greffrath W, Martin E, and Hermann S. Subthreshold oscillation of the membrane potential in magnocellular neurones of the rat supraoptic nucleus. J Physiol 526: 115–128, 2000.
Brivanlou IH, Warland DK, and Meister M. Mechanisms of concerted firing among retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 20: 527–539, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Buhl EH, Tamás G, and Fisahn A. Cholinergic activation and tonic excitation induce persistent gamma oscillations in mouse somatosensory cortex in vitro. J Physiol 513: 117–126, 1998.
Connors BW and Prince DA. Effects of local anesthetic QX-314 on the membrane properties of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 220: 476–481, 1982.
Deans MR, Gibson JR, Sellitto C, Connors BW, and Paul DL. Synchronous activity of inhibitory networks in neocortex requires electrical synapses containing connexin36. Neuron 31: 477–485, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Dong CJ and Werblin FS. Temporal contrast enhancement via GABAC feedback at bipolar terminals in the tiger salamander retina. J Neurophysiol 79: 2171–2180, 1998.
Dossi RC, Nunez A, and Steriade M. Electrophysiology of a slow (0.5–4 Hz) intrinsic oscillation of cat thalamocortical neurons in vivo. J Physiol 447: 215–234, 1992.
Dowling JE. Synaptic organization of the frog retina: an electron microscopic analysis comapring the retinas of frogs and primates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 170: 205–228, 1968.[Medline]
Dowling JE and Werblin FS. Organization of retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. I. Synaptic structure. J Neurophysiol 32: 315–338, 1969.
Du JL and Yang XL. Subcellular localization and complements of GABAA and GABAC receptors on bullfrog retinal bipolar cells. J Neurophysiol 84: 666–676, 2000.
Eckhorn R, Bauer R, Jordan W, Brosch M, Kruse W, Munk M, and Reitboeck HJ. Coherent oscillations: a mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? Multiple electrode and correlation analyses in the cat. Biol Cybern 60: 121–130, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Eeckman FH and Freeman WJ. Correlations between unit firing and EEG in the rat olfactory system. Brain Res 528: 238–244, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Engel AK, König P, Gray CM, and Singer W. Stimulus-dependent neuronal oscillations in cat visual cortex: inter-columnar interaction as determined by cross-correlation analysis. Eur J Neurosci 2: 588–606, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Famiglietti EV Jr, Kaneko A, and Tachibana M. Neuronal architecture of on and off pathways to ganglion cells in carp retina. Science 198: 1267–1269, 1977.
Gray CM and McCormick DA. Chattering cells: superficial pyramidal neurons contributing to the generation of synchronous oscillations in the visual cortex. Science 274: 109–113, 1996.
Gray CM and Singer W. Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 1698–1702, 1989.
Hartveit E. Reciprocal synaptic interactions between rod bipolar cells and amacrine cells in the rat retina. J Neurophysiol 81: 2923–2936, 1999.
Ishikane H, Kawana A, and Tachibana M. Short- and long-range synchronous activities in dimming detectors of the frog retina. Vis Neurosci 16: 1001–1014, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Jefferys JGR, Traub RD, and Whittington MA. Neuronal networks for induced "40 Hz" rhythms. Trends Neurosci 19: 202–208, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Kalloniatis M, Marc RE, and Murry RF. Amino acid signatures in the primate retina. J Neurosci 16: 6807–6829, 1996.
Kock JH, Mecke E, Orlov OY, Reuter T, Vaisanen RA, and Wallgren JE. Ganglion cells in the frog retina: discriminant analysis of histological classes. Vision Res 29: 1–18, 1989.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
König P, Engel AK, and Singer W. Relation between oscillatory activity and long-range synchronization in cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 290–294, 1995.
Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, and Pitts WH. What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proc IRE 47: 1940–1951, 1959.
Llinás RR, Grace AA, and Yarom Y. In vitro neurons in mammalian cortical layer 4 exhibit intrinsic oscillatory activity in the 10- to 50-Hz frequency range. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 897–901, 1991.
Matsui K, Hasegawa J, and Tachibana M. Modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by GABAC receptor-mediated feedback in the mouse inner retina. J Neurophysiol 86: 2285–2298, 2001.
Maturana HR, Lettvin JY, McCulloch WS, and Pitts WH. Anatomy and physiology of vision in the frog (Rana pipiens). J Gen Physiol 43, Suppl: 129–175, 1960.
Neuenschwander R and Singer W. Long-range synchronization of oscillatory light responses in the cat retina and lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 379: 728–732, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pan ZH and Hu HJ. Voltage-dependent Na+ currents in mammalian retinal cone bipolar cells. J Neurophysiol 84: 2564–2571, 2000.
Pedroarena C and Llinás R. Dendritic calcium conductances generate high-frequency oscillation in thalamocortical neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 724–728, 1997.
Perkel DH, Gerstein GL, and Moore GP. Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. II. Simultaneous spike trains. Biophys J 7: 419–440, 1967.
Ritz R and Sejnowski TJ. Synchronous oscillatory activity in sensory systems: new vistas on mechanisms. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7: 536–546, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Roska B, Nemeth E, and Werblin FS. Response to change is facilitated by a three-neuron disinhibitory pathway in the tiger salamander retina. J Neurosci 18: 3451–3459, 1998.
Shields CR and Lukasiewicz PD. Spike-dependent GABA inputs to bipolar cell axon terminals contribute to lateral inhibition of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 89: 2449–2458, 2003.
Singer W and Gray CM. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 18: 555–586, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Solessio E, Vigh J, Cuenca N, Rapp K, and Lasater EM. Membrane properties of an unusual intrinsically oscillating, wide-field teleost retinal amacrine cell. J Physiol 544: 831–47, 2002.
Stirling RV and Merrill EG. Functional morphology of frog retinal ganglion cells and their central projections: the dimming detectors. J Comp Neurol 258: 477–495, 1987.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sugai T, Sugitani M, and Onoda N. Effects of GABAergic agonists and antagonists on oscillatory signal propagation in the guinea-pig accessory olfactory bulb slice revealed by optical recording. Eur J Neurosci 11: 2773–2782, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Tachibana M, Ishikane H, Gangi M, Arai I, Asaka T, and Du JL. Neural mechanisms of synchronous oscillations in retinal ganglion cells. In: The neural Basis of Early Vision; Keio University International Symposia for Life Sciences and Medicine volume 11, edited by Kaneko A. Berlin: Springer, 59–60, 2003.
Traub RD, Kopell N, Bibbig A, Buhl EH, LeBeau FEN, and Whittington MA. Gap junctions between interneuron dendrites can enhance synchrony of gamma oscillations in distributed networks. J Neurosci 21: 9478–9486, 2001.
Ts'o DY and Gilbert CD. The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex. J Neurosci 8: 1712–1727, 1988.[Abstract]
Ts'o DY, Gilbert CD, and Wiesel TN. Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis. J Neurosci 6: 1160–1170, 1986.[Abstract]
Vaney DI. Many diverse types of retinal neurons show tracer coupling when injected with biocytin or Neurobiotin. Neurosci Lett 125: 187–190, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Vaney DI. Patterns of neuronal coupling in the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 13: 301–355, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI]
Vígh J, Bánvögyi T, and Wilhelm M. Amacrine cells of the anuran retina: morphology, chemical neuroanatomy, and physiology. Microsc Res Tech 50: 373–383, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Vigh J, Solessio E, Morgans CW, and Lasater EM. Ionic mechanisms mediating oscillatory membrane potentials in wide-field retinal amacrine cells. J Neurophysiol 90: 431–443, 2003.
Vitanova L, Kupenova. P, Haverkamp S, Popova E, Mitova L, and Wässle H. Immunocytochemical and electrophysiological characterization of GABA receptors in the frog and turtle retina. Vision Res 41: 691–
