JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 93: 1145-1157, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.00561.2004
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, S. T.

Modulation of Spontaneous Firing in Rat Subthalamic Neurons by 5-HT Receptor Subtypes

Zixiu Xiang1, Lie Wang1 and Stephen T. Kitai2

1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee, Neuroscience Institute, Health Science Center, Memphis; and 2Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee

Submitted 1 June 2004; accepted in final form 5 October 2004


 ABSTRACT
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is considered to be one of the driving forces in the basal ganglia circuit. The STN is innervated by serotonergic afferents from the raphe nucleus and expresses a variety of 5-HT receptor subtypes. We investigated the effects of 5-HT and 5-HT receptor subtype agonists and antagonists on the firing properties of STN neurons in rat brain slices. We used cell-attached, perforated-patch, and whole cell recording techniques to detect changes in firing frequency and pattern and electrical membrane properties. Due to the depolarization of membrane potential caused by reduced potassium conductance, 5-HT (10 µM) increased the firing frequency of STN neurons without changing their firing pattern. Cadmium failed to occlude the effect of 5-HT on firing frequency. 5-HT had no effect on afterhyperpolarization current. These results indicated that the 5-HT action was not mediated by high-voltage–activated calcium channel currents and calcium-dependent potassium currents. 5-HT had no effect on hyperpolarization-activated cation current (IH) amplitude and voltage-dependence of IH activation, suggesting that IH was not involved in 5-HT–induced excitation. The increased firing by 5-HT was mimicked by 5-HT2/4 receptor agonist {alpha}-methyl-5-HT and was partially mimicked by 5-HT2 receptor agonist DOI or 5-HT4 receptor agonist cisapride. The 5-HT action was partially reversed by 5-HT4 receptor antagonist SB 23597-190, 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketanserin, and 5-HT2C receptor antagonist RS 102221. Our data indicate that 5-HT has significant ability to modulate membrane excitability in STN neurons; modulation is accomplished by decreasing potassium conductance by activating 5-HT4 and 5-HT2C receptors.


 INTRODUCTION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is considered to be a major driving force in the basal ganglia circuit (Albin et al. 1989Go; Kitai and Kita 1987Go; Robledo and Feger 1990Go; Smith and Parent 1988Go) and is involved in motor functions (DeLong 1990Go; DeLong et al. 1985Go; Matsumura et al. 1992Go) as well as movement disorders (Albin et al. 1989Go; Bergman et al. 1994Go; Wichmann and DeLong 1996Go, 2003Go). Its prominent role in the physiology and pathophysiology of the basal ganglia has been signified by the dramatic therapeutic effects of lesion or high-frequency stimulation of the STN for Parkinson’s disease patients (DeLong and Wichmann 2001Go; Levy et al. 2000Go; Obeso et al. 2001Go; Pollak et al. 2002Go).

The STN is innervated by rich varicose serotonin (5-HT) fibers (Bobillier et al. 1976Go; Lavoie and Parent 1990Go; Moore et al. 1978Go; Mori et al. 1985Go; Palkovits et al. 1974Go; Steinbusch 1981Go), which originate mainly from the neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Bobillier et al. 1976Go; Lavoie and Parent 1990Go). The serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus have been implicated in various aspects of motor control (Steinfels et al. 1983Go). The action of serotonin is mediated by a variety of 5-HT receptors, including G protein–coupled subtypes (5-HT1, 5-HT2, 5-HT4–7) and a ligand-gated ion channel (5-HT3) (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Derkach et al. 1989Go; Gerhardt and van Heerikhuizen 1997Go; Hoyer et al. 1994Go, 2002Go). Several subtypes of 5-HT receptors are expressed in the STN. Histochemical studies by in situ hybridization have shown that 5-HT2C and 5-HT4 receptor mRNA is present at very high levels in the STN, whereas 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor mRNA appears to be expressed at lower levels (Pompeiano et al. 1994Go).

The effects of 5-HT on membrane excitability of hippocampal and cerebral cortical neurons have been studied extensively. For instance, activation of 5-HT2, 5-HT3, or 5-HT4 receptors resulted in depolarization of membrane potential and increased neuronal excitability (Davies et al. 1987Go; McCormick et al. 1993Go; McMahon and Kauer 1997Go; Ropert and Guy 1991Go; Xiang and Prince 2003Go), whereas activation of 5-HT1A receptors caused hyperpolarization and decreased excitability (Andrade and Nicoll 1987Go; Beck et al. 1992Go; Davies et al. 1987Go; Tanaka and North 1993Go; Xiang and Prince 2003Go). The 5-HT2 or 5-HT4 receptor-mediated excitation is associated with 1) a decrease in potassium conductances (Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Davies et al. 1987Go; Zhang 2003Go), 2) reduction in high-voltage activated (HVA) calcium channel currents (Bayliss et al. 1997Go; Foehring 1996Go) and calcium-activated afterhyperpolarization (AHP) (Andrade and Chaput 1991Go; Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Torres et al. 1994Go), and 3) facilitation in hyperpolarization-activated nonselective cation current [IH or hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (HCN)] (Bickmeyer et al. 2002Go; Zhang 2003Go). For 5-HT2 receptor activation, evidence suggests that in some cases the excitatory responses involve the 5-HT2A receptor subtype while others are mediated by the 5-HT2C receptor (Aghajanian 1995Go). The excitatory responses to 5-HT3 activation, primarily found in interneurons of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, result from an increase in a mixed cationic conductance (Kawa 1994Go; McMahon and Kauer 1997Go; Roerig and Katz 1997Go; Ropert and Guy 1991Go; Xiang and Prince 2003Go; Zhou and Hablitz 1999Go). On the other hand, neuronal hyperpolarization induced by 5-HT1A activation is due to opening of potassium channels (Andrade and Nicoll 1987Go; Davies et al. 1987Go; Xiang and Prince 2003Go).

Electrophysiological investigation of serotonin in STN neurons is limited to only one extracellular recording study (Flores et al. 1995Go), which reported an increase in firing by 5-HT. Our study was designed to analyze in detail the effect of 5-HT on firing properties of STN neurons and to determine underlying ionic mechanisms and the receptor subtypes involved.


 METHODS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
All procedures were performed according to protocols approved by the University of Tennessee Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Slice preparation

Sprague-Dawley rats (P16–P23) were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium and transcardially perfused with ~20 ml of ice-cold oxygenated (95% O2-5% CO2) "cutting solution," which was composed of (in mM) 230 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 0.5 CaCl2, 10 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 D-glucose. The brain was rapidly removed from the skull, blocked in the sagittal plane, and glued to the stage of a D.S.K. microslicer (Dosaka EM). Sagittal slices containing the STN were cut at a thickness of 300 µm in ice-cold oxygenated "cutting solution." Slices were incubated in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) at 32°C for 1 h and maintained at room temperature afterward until transferred to a recording chamber. The recording chamber was continuously perfused with oxygenated ACSF at 32°C. The ACSF contained (in mM) 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgSO4, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 D-glucose. In the experiments where CdCl2 or BaCl2 was used, MgSO4 and NaH2PO4 were replaced by MgCl2 and KCl, respectively.

Electrophysiology

Whole cell, cell-attached, or perforated-patch recordings were made from visually identified STN neurons under an Olympus BX50WI upright microscope (Olympus, Lake Success, NY). A low-power objective (4x) was used to identify the STN, and a 40x water immersion objective coupled with Hoffman optics and infrared video was employed to visualize individual STN neurons. An Axopatch 1D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) was used for the recordings. Patch pipettes were prepared from borosilicate glass (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA) using a Flaming-Brown micropipette puller (Model P-97, Sutter Instruments). The pipette solution contained (in mM) 106 K-MeSO4, 25 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 0.025 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.1 EGTA, 2 ATP, and 0.2 GTP. The pH of the pipette solution was adjusted to 7.3 with 1 M KOH, and osmolarity was adjusted to 290–295 mOsm. For perforated-patch recordings, gramicidin was added to the pipette solution to a final concentration of 18–40 µg/ml immediately before use. When filled with the above solution, patch pipettes had resistances of 2.5–4 M{Omega}.

Drug application

GABAzine (SR-95531), {alpha}-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine ({alpha}-m-5-HT), and 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide (mCPBG), RS 23597-190, and cisapride were obtained from Tocris (Ballwin, MO). All the other drugs including 5-HT, ketanserin, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), DNQX, and APV were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). They were made up as concentrated stock solutions in water or DMSO and stored at –20°C. Stocks were thawed and diluted to final concentrations in ACSF immediately before use and either bath-applied or applied through a multibarreled microperfusion pipette (inner diameter ~200 µm) placed within 0.5 mm from the recorded neuron.

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparison was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon’s matched pairs test or Mann-Whitney U test. P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data are presented as means ± SE.


 RESULTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effect of 5-HT on spontaneous firing and action potential properties of STN neurons

Perforated-patch recording technique was used to examine the effect of 5-HT on the firing frequency, firing pattern, and action potential properties of STN neurons. This and the following experiments were carried out in the presence of ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists, DNQX (20 µM) and APV (50 µM), and GABAA receptor antagonist GABAzine (SR-95531, 10 µM) to rule out a possible presynaptic effect of 5-HT. Subthalamic neurons exhibited spontaneous, rhythmic firing in unstimulated slices. Blockade of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission had no significant effect on the mean values of the interspike interval (ISI) and CV of ISI (158.1 ± 20.2 vs. 144.4 ± 18.8 ms for ISI before and after applying the antagonists, respectively, P = 0.08; 0.068 ± 0.004 vs. 0.068 ± 0.006 for CV of ISI, P = 0.5, n = 15). These observations suggest that a rhythmic firing of STN neurons is governed mainly by their intrinsic membrane properties and that spontaneous synaptic activity in slice preparation plays an insignificant role in the firing patterns of STN neurons. These findings are consistent with the previous experiment on firing pattern of STN neurons with ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists by Bevan and Wilson (Bevan and Wilson 1999Go).

An application of 5-HT (10 µM) caused a robust increase in firing frequency, evidenced by a reduction in ISI (Fig. 1, A–C). This effect was reversed following washout of 5-HT (Fig. 1, A–C). In eight STN cells, 5-HT decreased ISI by 15–69% with a mean value of 38.5 ± 6.9% (158.6 ± 19.2 ms in control and 94.0 ± 17.6 ms after 5-HT application, P = 0.01; Fig. 1D, left). 5-HT did not alter the pattern of rhythmic firing (Fig. 1B). The ISI of STN neurons exhibited a normal distribution in controls and shifted to the left without changing its "normalness" after application of 5-HT (Fig. 1C). Quantitative analysis revealed that the CV of ISI did not change following 5-HT application (0.061 ± 0.007 in control and 0.065 ± 0.010 in 5-HT, P = 0.4, n = 8; Fig. 1D, right), suggesting that 5-HT did not modulate the firing pattern of STN neurons. A similar result of 5-HT action on firing properties of STN neurons was obtained with cell-attached recording technique, which minimized a possible influence of intracellular dialysis on neuronal firing properties (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. 5-HT increased frequency of spontaneous firing without changing firing pattern of subthalamic nucleus (STN) neurons. A: interspike interval (ISI) plotted as a function of time during control, application of 5-HT, and washout for a STN neuron recorded with perforated-patch recording technique. B: left: sample traces taken from the same cell as in A during control (a), application of 5-HT (b), and after washout (c). Right: 10 consecutive action potentials were aligned to the peak and superimposed, showing the fluctuation of ISI. C: ISI distributions for 30-s epochs in control, 5-HT, and washout for the same cell as in A and B. Mean ISI was 68.5 ± 0.2 ms for control, 43.5 ± 0.1 ms for 5-HT, and 64.4 ± 0.2 ms for washout. The CV of ISI was 0.051, 0.063, and 0.060 for control, 5-HT, and washout, respectively. D: bar graphs summarized average ISI and CV in control and following 5-HT application for 8 cells. *P = 0.01; n.s.P = 0.4. E: aligned 10 action potentials (left) and their averages (right) for each condition were superimposed to show less hyperpolarization of "apparent" afterhyperpolarization (AHP) following 5-HT application. Note that, in 5-HT, action potential threshold, action potential width, and depolarizing voltage trajectory preceding action potential (arrow) were not altered, but the amplitude of AHP was decreased. Records were taken from the same cell as in A–C.

 
The 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency was associated with a depolarization of the interspike voltage (Fig. 1D), with a change in the peak of AHP from –64.5 ± 1.3 to –61.5 ± 1.4 mV (P = 0.01, n = 8). However, 5-HT had no significant effect on the threshold and the width of action potential (-44.8 ± 1.4 mV in control and –44.3 ± 1.6 mV in 5-HT for the threshold, P = 0.3, n = 8; 1.96 ± 0.11 ms in control and 2.03 ± 0.10 ms in 5-HT for the width, P = 0.07, n = 8; cf. Fig. 1D). Furthermore, the slow depolarizing membrane potential trajectory immediately preceding the onset of action potential was essentially identical in the control and with 5-HT (Fig. 1D), suggesting that the persistent sodium conductance (Bevan and Wilson 1999Go; Hallworth et al. 2003Go) was not affected by 5-HT.

5-HT had no effect on calcium-dependent K+ channel-mediated AHP current, but directly depolarized the membrane potential

It has been reported that HVA calcium channel currents and calcium-dependent potassium currents play important roles in spontaneous rhythmic firing of STN neurons (Bevan and Wilson 1999Go). To determine whether 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency of STN neurons is through its action on HVA calcium channel currents and/or calcium-dependent potassium channels, we examined the effect of 5-HT in the presence of HVA calcium channel blocker cadmium to assess if cadmium could occlude the action of 5-HT. As shown in Fig. 2, applying cadmium (600 µM) gave rise to an increase in firing frequency of STN neurons, reflected by a decrease in ISI; adding 5-HT (10 µM) to the cadmium-containing perfusate caused a further increase in firing frequency (Fig. 2, A, B, D, and E). In six STN neurons, cadmium caused a significant decrease in ISI by 12–28%, with a mean value of 22.1 ± 3.0% (141.5 ± 18.2 ms in control and 109.5 ± 13.8 ms in cadmium, P = 0.03, n = 6; Fig. 2E). Adding 5-HT (100 µM) in the presence of cadmium resulted in a further decrease in ISI by 15–69%, with a mean value of 39.0 ± 8.1% (109.5 ± 13.8 ms in cadmium and 65.2 ± 10.2 ms in 5-HT and cadmium, P = 0.03, n = 6; Fig. 2E). It should be noted that the CV of ISI increased following application of cadmium (0.074 ± 0.018 in control and 0.139 ± 0.032 in cadmium, P = 0.03, n = 6) but did not change after adding 5-HT (0.163 ± 0.034 in 5-HT and cadmium compared with 0.139 ± 0.032 in cadmium alone, P = 0.1, n = 6; Fig. 2E). These data indicate that 5-HT action in STN neurons did not involve modulation of HVA calcium channels and calcium-dependent potassium channels. It is interesting to note that applying cadmium also caused a depolarization of the interspike voltage with a decrease in amplitude of AHP (Fig. 2C), similar to the action of 5-HT (cf. Fig. 1E).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency of STN neurons was not mediated by high-voltage–activated (HVA) calcium channels. A: ISI plotted as a function of time during control, CdCl2 application, and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT for a STN neuron recorded with perforated-patch recording technique. B: left: sample records obtained from the same neuron as in A during control (a), application of CdCl2 (b), and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT (c). Right: 10 consecutive action potentials were aligned to the peak and superimposed, showing the fluctuation of ISI in control, during application of CdCl2, and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT. C: 10 action potentials (left) and their averages (right) for each condition were aligned and superimposed, showing depolarization of interspike voltage with decrease in amplitude of AHP caused by application CdCl2 and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT. Note that action potential threshold, action potential width, and depolarizing voltage trajectory (arrow) preceding action potentials were not altered following application of CdCl2 and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT. D: ISI distributions for 1-min epochs in control, during application of CdCl2, and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT for the cell in A–C. Mean ISI was 163.3 ± 0.6 ms for control, 117.5 ± 0.5 ms for CdCl2 application, and 74.3 ± 0.3 ms for co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT. The CV of ISI was 0.047, 0.063, and 0.075 for control, CdCl2 application, and co-application of CdCl2 and 5-HT, respectively. E: bar graphs summarize mean ISI and CV in control, following application of CdCl2 alone and CdCl2 and 5-HT together for 6 cells. *P = 0.03.

 
However, the underlying mechanisms for the actions of 5-HT and cadmium are probably different. The cadmium-induced depolarization of interspike voltage is likely due to a decrease in AHP current as a result of blockade of HVA calcium channels, whereas the less hyperpolarization of "apparent" AHP produced by 5-HT has little to do with AHP current. To test this hypothesis, whole cell voltage-clamp experiments were conducted to examine the effects of cadmium and 5-HT on AHP current. As anticipated, applying cadmium significantly decreased AHP current (37.2 ± 4.9 pA in control and 13.3 ± 3.4 pA in cadmium, P = 0.02, n = 7; Fig. 3, A and B), whereas 5-HT had no effect on the AHP current (28.5 ± 4.4 pA in control and 28.3 ± 4.4 pA in 5-HT, P = 0.6, n = 7; Fig. 3C). These results suggested that the 5-HT–induced depolarization of interspike voltage with decrease in AHP amplitude was most likely due to an overall membrane potential depolarization rather than a direct effect on the AHP current. This notion was supported by the observation that an increase in firing by intracellular injection of depolarizing current was accompanied by a reduction of "apparent" AHP amplitude (Fig. 3, D and E).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Cadmium reduced AHP current and 5-HT depolarized membrane potential. A: averaged AHP currents (I-AHP) in control, during application of cadmium, and washout for a STN neuron recorded with whole cell voltage-clamp technique. B: bar graph summarizes the effect of cadmium on I-AHP for 7 cells, *P = 0.02. C: left and middle: averaged AHP currents in control and during application of 5-HT for another STN neuron recorded with whole cell voltage-clamp technique. Right: 2 traces were superimposed, showing no change in amplitude and decay kinetics of I-AHP in 5-HT. In A and C, I-AHP was elicited by a brief voltage step (4 ms, 80 mV) from holding potential of –60 mV. Each trace was an average of 10 trials. D: spontaneous firing (left) and current injection induced-firing (right) recorded from a STN neuron with perforated-patch recording technique. E: individual action potentials (left) obtained from the same neuron as in D during spontaneous firing (thick traces) and depolarization-induced firing (thin traces) and their average (right) were aligned to the peak and superimposed, respectively. Note that a decrease in amplitude of AHP is associated with depolarization of interspike voltage in response to current injection. F: 5-HT depolarized membrane potential under current clamp (F1) and elicited an inward shift of the holding current in under voltage clamp (F2). Recordings were performed using whole cell recording techniques in the presence of TTX (1 µM), GABAzine (10 µM), DNQX (20 µM), and APV (50 µM).

 
To further test whether 5-HT caused depolarization of membrane potential or inward current in STN neurons, we applied 5-HT in the presence of TTX (1 µM), GABAzine (10 µM), DNQX (20 µM), and APV (50 µM) under the whole cell current-clamp or voltage-clamp condition. As shown in Fig. 3F1, 5-HT reversibly depolarized the membrane potential by 3.7 ± 0.4 mV (–60.6 ± 2.5 mV in control and –56.9 ± 2.4 mV in 5-HT, P = 0.03, n = 6). Under voltage-clamp condition, 5-HT elicited an inward current at a holding potential of –60 mV (Fig. 3F2), with a mean value of 19.6 ± 2.9 pA (n = 8).

These data indicate that the mechanisms underlying a modulation of firing properties by cadmium and 5-HT were different. That is, 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency is due to depolarization of membrane potential, which subsequently leads to a reduction of AHP amplitude. In contrast, cadmium-induced increase in firing frequency is likely to be a direct consequence of a decrease in AHP current. We therefore could conclude that HVA calcium channel currents and calcium-dependent potassium channel-mediated AHP were not involved in the serotonergic modulation of firing frequency in STN neurons.

Decrease in potassium conductance underlies 5-HT–induced membrane potential depolarization

To determine the ionic mechanism underlying the 5-HT–induced depolarization, we conducted whole cell voltage-clamp experiments in which 1-s voltage ramp commands from –60 to –120 mV were applied every 10 s. As shown in Fig. 4A, 5-HT–induced inward current was associated with a decrease in the amplitude of current in response to the voltage ramp command, indicating a decrease in membrane conductance. To estimate the reversal potential (Er) of the 5-HT–induced conductance change, we obtained 5-HT–induced current ({Delta}I) by subtracting the current in control from the current in the present of 5-HT (I5-HT Icontrol) and plotted it as a function of the voltage ramp command (Fig. 4B). The linear portion of the current-voltage relationship was fitted with a linear regression line (Fig. 4B). The voltage corresponding to the crossing point of the linear regression line and the voltage abscissa at {Delta}I = 0 was taken as a measurement of Er (Fig. 4B). The mean value of Er for the 5-HT–induced current was –100.4 ± 4.1 mV (n = 5), which is close to the calculated K+ equilibrium potential of –104 mV. The involvement of K+ conductance in the 5-HT action was further confirmed by using K+ channel blocker barium. Similar to the 5-HT action, the application of BaCl2 (500 µM) caused an inward shift of the holding current, a reduction in membrane conductance, and a suppression of the response of STN neurons to 5-HT (Fig. 4C; n = 5). These results strongly suggest that a reduction of K+ conductance is involved in the 5-HT–induced excitation in STN neurons.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. 5-HT–induced depolarization was due to a reduction of K+ conductance. A: current vs. voltage plot of a STN neuron during hyperpolarizing voltage ramps in control and following application of 5-HT as indicated. B: subtraction of 2 currents, control and 5-HT in B ({Delta}I = I5-HTIcontrol). Linear portion of data was fitted by a linear regression line with an estimated reversal potential of –102.5 mV. C: current vs. voltage plot of a STN neuron during hyperpolarizing voltage ramps in control, application of BaCl2 (500 µM), and co-application of BaCl2 and 5-HT. Note that Ba2+ caused an inward shift of a holding current that was associated with a reduction of membrane conductance and reversed at –93.8 mV. In addition, application of 5-HT in the presence of Ba2+ failed to induce an inward shift of a holding current and a change in the membrane conductance. These experiments were conducted using whole cell recording techniques.

 
5-HT had no effect on IH

It is well known that STN neurons express prominent IH current. To determine whether an enhancement or a change in the voltage dependence of IH activation is contributing to 5-HT–induced excitability in STN neurons, we have examined the effect of 5-HT on IH using a whole cell voltage-clamp recording technique. An application of a series of hyperpolarizing voltage steps (0.8–1.5 s) elicited voltage- and time-dependent inward currents that resembled the characteristics of IH. These responses were blocked by IH blocker ZD 7288 (50 µM; Fig. 5A). Figure 5B shows the records of hyperpolarization-activated currents in control and following application of 5-HT (10 µM). An apparent effect of 5-HT was reduction of membrane conductance. This is shown in Fig. 5C1, where current-voltage relationships for instantaneous current (Iinst) and steady-state current (Iss) were plotted. The reduction of membrane conductance was more apparent when the current differences for Iinst and Iss in control and 5-HT were plotted as a function of membrane potential (Fig. 5C2). The reversal potential of the 5-HT–induced conductance change was about –90 mV. This is consistent with the involvement of potassium conductance indicated by the ramp-voltage-clamp experiment (Fig. 4, B and C). The subtraction of the steady-state current and the instantaneous current (IH = IssIinst) was taken as the measurement of IH. As showed in Fig. 5C3, 5-HT did not enhance IH at the membrane potential ranging from –50 to –140 mV. A quantitative analysis on seven STN neurons revealed that 5-HT had no significant effect on IH measured at –60, –80, or –120 mV (0.7 ± 1.7 pA in control and 0.9 ± 1.1 pA in 5-HT at –60 mV, P = 1; 11.3 ± 3.4 pA in control and 8.7 ± 1.7 pA in 5-HT at –80 mV, P = 0.3; 94.9 ± 19.6 pA in control and 83.8 ± 16.6 pA in 5-HT at –120 mV, P = 0.2).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Effect of 5-HT on IH in STN neurons examined with whole cell recording technique. A: top: hyperpolarizing voltage steps used to elicit current responses (bottom) during control (A1) and application of ZD 7288 (50 µM; A2). A time-dependent increase in the inward current activated by hyperpolarization resembled the characteristics of IH and was blocked by ZD 7288. B: top: hyperpolarizing voltage steps used to elicit current responses (bottom) during control (B1) and application of 5-HT (10 µM; B2). Instantaneous current response (Iinst), steady-state current response (Iss), and tail current (Itail) were measured at latencies as indicated by open bars. C: current-voltage (I-V) relationship for Iinst and Iss in control and 5-HT (C1), for current difference of Iinst in control and 5-HT and current difference of Iss in control and 5-HT (C2), and for IH (determined by difference between Iss and Iinst) in control and 5-HT (C3). Note that 5-HT decreased membrane conductance (C1 and C2), but did not enhance the IH amplitude (C3). D: normalized IH was plotted as a function of voltage and fitted with a Boltzmann equation, I/Imax= 1/{1 + exp[(V + V1/2)/k]}. Normalized IH was determined from the tail current relative to that obtained at –140 mV as indicated in A. Note that 5-HT did not change the half-maximal activation voltage (V1/2) or the slope factor (k). V1/2 was –107.0 mV in control and –105.2 mV in 5-HT, and k was 10.1 in control and 11.0 in 5-HT.

 
To determine whether 5-HT modulated the voltage dependence of IH activation, we measured the tail current amplitude at a fixed membrane potential (–140 mV or –120 mV) with hyperpolarizing voltage at various test potentials (Fig. 5B1, Itail). The normalized IH was determined from a tail current relative to that obtained at –140 or –120 mV. The activation curve was generated by plotting the normalized IH as a function of the membrane potential and fitted with a Boltzmann equation, I/IMax = 1/{1 + exp[(VV1/2)/k]} (Fig. 5D), where IMax is maximal tail current, V1/2 is the potential at which the current is half-maximally activated, and k is a slope factor. This analysis indicated that the membrane potential at half-maximal activation and slope factor were not altered by 5-HT (V1/2 was –97.3 ± 4.8 mV in control and –99.8 ± 4.5 mV in 5-HT, P = 0.2; k was 9.4 ± 0.5 in control and 9.3 ± 0.4 in 5-HT, P = 0.7, n = 7). The characterization of IH was sometimes hampered by an overlap of IH with other voltage-activated ionic currents, such as inward rectifier K+ currents that activate over a similar range of potentials. To rule out the possibility that 5-HT–induced reduction of K+ conductance masked the change of IH following 5-HT application, we repeated the IH experiment in the presence of potassium channel blocker barium. A similar lack of the effect on IH amplitude and activation curve by 5-HT was observed (n = 4). These results indicate that the 5-HT–induced excitation in STN neurons could not be attributed to the enhancement of IH or change in the voltage dependence of IH activation.

Effect of 5-HT on the relationship between firing frequency and level of depolarization by current injection

The effects of 5-HT on repetitive firing frequency in response to intracellular injection of depolarizing current pulses were examined in seven STN neurons. As shown in Fig. 6A, a given intensity of depolarization current injection elicited a higher frequency spike train in the presence of 5-HT (10 µM) than the control. Figure 6B shows the relationships between the firing frequencies (f; 1st ISI and average frequency) versus injected current intensities (I). The linear portion of the f-I relationship was fit with a linear regression line. As shown in Fig. 7B, the f-I relationships for both first ISI and average frequency were shifted to the left following the application of 5-HT. A slight increase in the slope of linear regression line for first ISI was observed with 5-HT application (0.529 ± 0.068 Hz/pA in 5-HT compared with 0.483 ± 0.062 Hz/pA in control, P = 0.01, n = 8), whereas the slope for the average frequency was not significantly altered (0.397 ± 0.048 Hz/pA in control and 0.424 ± 0.059 Hz/pA in 5-HT, P = 0.2, n = 8). In contrast, applying cadmium caused a very robust increase in the slope of f-I relationships for both first ISI and average frequency (0.372 ± 0.049 Hz/pA in control vs. 0.723 ± 0.040 Hz/pA in cadmium for the 1st ISI, P = 0.03, n = 6; 0.298 ± 0.029 Hz/pA in control vs. 0.606 ± 0.028 Hz/pA in cadmium for the average frequency, P = 0.03, n = 6; Fig. 6C). These results indicate that 5-HT plays a limited role in modulating input-output function of STN neurons. It also supports the conclusions that 1) different mechanisms underlie 5-HT–induced and cadmium-induced increase in firing frequency, and 2) HVA calcium channel and AHP current are not involved in the serotonergic modulation of STN neurons.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effect of 5-HT on the relationship between the firing frequency and depolarizing current intensity in STN neurons examined with perforated-patch recording technique. A: firing of a STN neuron in response to different intensity of depolarizing current injection in control (left) and after application of 10 µM 5-HT (right). B: frequency-current (f-I) relationship for the 1st interspike interval (1st ISI; left) and mean firing frequency (right) before and after 5-HT application in the same neuron as in A. Linear regions of the f-I relationship were fitted by linear regression lines. Note an increase in f-I slope for the 1st ISI (left) but not for the mean firing frequency (right) after application of 5-HT. C: f-I relationship for the 1st ISI (left) and mean firing frequency (right) before and after application of cadmium (600 µM) in a different STN neuron. Linear regions of the f-I relationship were fitted by linear regression lines. Note an increase in f-I slope for both the 1st ISI (left) and the mean firing frequency (right) after cadmium application.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. {alpha}-Methyl-5-HT ({alpha}-m-5-HT) increased firing frequency of STN neurons. A: ISI plotted as a function of time during control, application of {alpha}-m-5-HT, and after washout for a STN neuron recorded with perforated-patch technique. B: left: sample records taken from the same cell as in A during control (a), following application of {alpha}-m-5-HT (b), and washout (c). Right: 10 consecutive action potentials were aligned to the peak and superimposed, showing the fluctuation of ISI. C: averaged action potentials for each condition were aligned and superimposed, showing depolarization of interspike voltage with decrease in AHP amplitude caused by {alpha}-m-5-HT. Note that, similar to the action of 5-HT, action potential threshold, action potential width, and depolarizing voltage trajectory preceding action potential (arrow) were not altered during application of {alpha}-m-5-HT. D: ISI distributions for 30-s epochs in control, {alpha}-m-5-HT, and washout for the same cell as in A–C. Mean ISI was 158.2 ± 0.4 ms for control, 105.0 ± 0.2 ms for {alpha}-m-5-HT, and 123.0 ± 0.4 ms for washout. The CV of ISI was 0.037, 0.040, and 0.047 for control, {alpha}-m-5-HT, and washout, respectively. E: bar graphs summarize mean ISI and CV in control and following {alpha}-m-5-HT application for 7 cells. *P = 0.02; n.s.P = 0.5.

 
5-HT4 and 5-HT2C receptor subtypes involved in serotonin action in STN neurons

To determine 5-HT receptor subtypes involved in modulating firing frequency in STN neurons, we examined the effects of various 5-HT receptor agonists and antagonists in STN neurons. Local application of 5-HT3 receptor agonist mCPBG (3 µM) had negligible effect on the ISI in STN neurons (198.7 ± 58.2 ms in control and 177.1 ± 36.5 ms in mCPBG, P = 0.8, n = 10). In contrast, {alpha}-m-5-HT (20 µM), an agent commonly used as a 5-HT2 receptor agonist, mimicked the action of 5-HT (Fig. 7). It reduced the ISI by 34% on average (165.6 ± 19.8 vs. 109.1 ± 12.1 ms for ISI in control and {alpha}-m-5-HT, respectively, P = 0.02, n = 7) with no effect on CV of ISI (0.082 ± 0.030 vs. 0.062 ± 0.011 for CV of ISI in control and {alpha}-m-5-HT, P = 0.5, n = 7; Fig. 7E). The magnitude of increase in firing frequency by {alpha}-m-5-HT was comparable to 5-HT–induced action (cf. Fig. 1). On the other hand, another 5-HT2 receptor agonist, DOI (10 µM), was less effective in modulating firing frequency in STN neurons (Fig. 8A). DOI reduced the ISI by 18% (129.7 ± 21.3 ms in control and 105.4 ± 16.8 ms in DOI, P = 0.02, n = 7; Fig. 8A2). Furthermore, preperfusion with 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserin (10 µM), failed to prevent the action of 5-HT (Fig. 8B). In the presence of 10 µM ketanserin, 5-HT decreased the ISI by 31% (151.8 ± 20.8 ms in ketanserin-containing ACSF as control and 101.3 ± 16.5 ms during co-application of 5-HT and ketanserin, P = 0.04, n = 5; Fig. 8B2). These data suggest that receptors other than 5-HT2 subtypes are also engaged in modulating firing in STN neurons.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Effects of 5-HT4 and 5-HT2 receptor agonists and antagonists on the firing frequency of STN neurons examined with cell-attached technique. A: 5-HT2 receptor agonist DOI (10 µM) increased firing frequency of STN neurons. B: preperfusion with 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketaserin (10 µM) failed to prevent the 5-HT action. C: 5-HT4 receptor agonist cisapride (1 µM) increased the firing frequency of STN neurons. D: co-application of 5-HT4 receptor antagonist RS 23597-190 (30 µM) and 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketaserin (10 µM) fully reversed the 5-HT action. A1–D1 show time courses of ISI during control and application of agonist and/or antagonist as indicated. Each symbol represents the mean and SE of ISI in a 5-s period (SE was smaller than the size of symbol). A2–D2 represent bar graphs summarizing the normalized mean ISI in different conditions. In A2, *P = 0.02, n = 7; in B2, *P = 0.04, n = 5; in C2, *P = 0.01, n = 8; and in D2, *P = 0.03, n = 6.

 
Because {alpha}-m-5-HT has been shown to have good affinity for 5-HT4 receptor (Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Gerald et al. 1995Go), we examined the effect of a selective 5-HT4 agonist cisapride in STN neurons. As shown in Fig. 8C, application of cisapride (1 µM) decreased the ISI by 25% (178.0 ± 30.7 ms in control and 134.1 ± 27.7 ms in cisapride, P = 0.01, n = 8).

To further confirm the roles of 5-HT4 and 5-HT2 receptors in serotonergic modulation of STN neurons, we examined the effects of 5-HT4 receptor antagonist RS 23597-190 together with 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketanserin on 5-HT action. As shown in Fig. 8D1, application of RS 23597-190 (30 µM) reversed a large fraction of the 5-HT–induced decrease in ISI, and the addition of ketanserin (10 µM) completely reversed the action of 5-HT. Figure 8D2 summarizes the effects of RS 23597-190 and ketanserin on the 5-HT–induced decrease of ISI, expressed as a percentage of the control value. RS 23597-190 reversed the 5-HT action by 62% (from 51.3 ± 4.8% in 5-HT to 81.6 ± 5.5% in 5-HT and RS 23597-190, P = 0.03, n = 6), and the addition of ketanserin fully reversed the 5-HT action (from 81.6 ± 5.5% in 5-HT and RS 23597-190 to 107.2 ± 5.8% after the addition of ketanserin, P = 0.03, n = 6).

Because it has been reported that STN neurons express 5-HT2C receptor mRNA at a high level and 5-HT2A receptor mRNA at a low level (Pompeiano et al. 1994Go), we examined the effect of a selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist RS 122201 (Bonhaus et al. 1993Go) on 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency. As shown in Fig. 9, RS 122201 (1 µM) partially reversed the 5-HT action by 45% (from 66.2 ± 2.7% in 5-HT to 81.5 ± 1.6% in 5-HT and RS 122201, P = 0.03, n = 6). It is interesting to note that the magnitude of the antagonizing effect of RS 122201 on 5-HT action was comparable with that of keranserin (45 vs. 40%, respectively, P = 0.8), which suggested that the 5-HT2 receptor–mediated component was due to activation of 5-HT2C receptors. Taken together, the results indicated that 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency in STN neurons was mediated by 5-HT4 and 5-HT2C receptor subtypes, with a larger fraction of action attributed to activation of 5-HT4 receptors.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. RS 102221 partially reversed the action of 5-HT on firing frequency in STN neurons in cell-attached recording mode. A: ISI plotted as a function of time during control, application of 5-HT (10 µM), and co-application of 5-HT and RS 102221 (1 µM) for a STN neuron recorded with cell-attached technique. B: sample records taken from the same neuron as in A during control (a), application of 5-HT (b), and co-application of 5-HT and RS 102221 (c). C: bar graph summarizes normalized mean ISI in control and following application of 5-HT and co-application of 5-HT and RS 102221. *P = 0.03, n = 6.

 

 DISCUSSION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our results clearly indicated a role of 5-HT in modulation of firing of subthalamic neurons, exerting an excitatory effect on STN neurons. That is, 5-HT increased the overall firing frequency without changing the rhythmic firing pattern of STN neurons. The increased firing was due to depolarization of membrane potential caused by a reduction in potassium conductance and mediated mainly by 5-HT2C and 5-HT4 receptor subtypes.

Ionic mechanism underlying 5-HT–induced excitation

5-HT–induced depolarization leading to an increase in neuronal excitation has been observed in various neurons in the CNS (Andrade and Nicoll 1987Go; Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Davies et al. 1987Go; Eriksson et al. 2001Go; Foehring et al. 2002Go; McCormick and Wang 1991Go; Zhang 2003Go). This observation indicates the importance of 5-HT in modulating neuronal excitability across different brain regions.

Several membrane conductances have been reported to be involved in serotonergic modulation of neuronal excitability. 5-HT has been shown to 1) reduce resting potassium conductance and voltage-dependent potassium conductance (Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Davies et al. 1987Go; Zhang 2003Go), 2) decrease amplitude of calcium-dependent potassium current-mediated AHP (Andrade and Chaput 1991Go; Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Lorenzon and Foehring 1992Go; Torres et al. 1994Go), 3) facilitate IH (McCormick and Pape 1990Go; Zhang 2003Go), and 4) inhibit HVA calcium channel currents (Bayliss et al. 1995Go, 1997Go; Foehring 1996Go). Data from this study provided evidence that 5-HT–induced increase in firing frequency in STN neurons was due to depolarization of membrane potential caused by a reduced potassium conductance. HVA calcium channel currents and calcium-dependent potassium currents were not involved in this action, because cadmium failed to occlude the effect of 5-HT, and 5-HT had no effect on AHP current. Although a blockade of IH did not significantly alter the basal firing in STN neurons (Bevan and Wilson 1999Go), in principle, an increase in IH or positive shift of the IH activation curve could increase the excitability of STN neurons. However, our voltage-clamp analysis on IH showed that 5-HT had no significant effect on IH amplitude and voltage dependence of IH activation. We therefore concluded that IH was not involved in 5-HT modulation on firing of STN neurons.

5-HT modulation of f-I relationship

5-HT application shifted the f-I relationships for both first ISI and average frequency to the left. At the same time, it increased the slopes of the linear portion of f-I relationship for the first ISI but not the average frequency. Such constancy of the f-I slopes for average frequency following 5-HT application was probably due to the insensitivity of AHP current to 5-HT. This notion was supported by the observation that cadmium, which inhibits AHP current, not only caused a shift of the f-I relationships for both first ISI and average frequency to the left but also caused a robust increase in the f-I slope for both first ISI and average frequency (Fig. 6C). The increase in the slope of f-I relationships for both first ISI and steady-state frequency following 5-HT application has been reported in neonatal hypoglossal and trigeminal motoneurons and attributed to 5-HT–induced attenuation of mAHP (Berger et al. 1992Go; Hsiao et al. 1997Go; Inoue et al. 1999Go). In contrast, the left-shifted f-I relationships without change in the f-I slope for the average frequency indicated that serotonergic activation only increased overall firing frequency without changing average input-output gain of STN neurons. The increase in the f-I slope for the first ISI suggested that the small changes in incoming synaptic inputs would produce large alterations in initial firing frequency of STN neurons.

Receptor subtypes involved in 5-HT–induced excitation

Among the 5-HT receptor families, 5-HT2, 5-HT3, and 5-HT4 receptors have been shown to mediate excitatory responses in the brain (Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Chapin et al. 2002Go; Davies et al. 1987Go; McMahon and Kauer 1997Go; Xiang and Prince 2003Go; Zhang 2003Go). The 5-HT2 receptor family consists of three receptor subtypes (5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C), which have similar pharmacological profiles, molecular structures, and signal transduction pathways (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go). The similarity of the pharmacological profiles of 5-HT2 receptor subtypes makes it difficult to characterize each subtype because of a lack of selective agonists or antagonists (Baxter et al. 1995Go). The 5-HT4 receptor has at least four splice variants: 5-HT4(a), 5-HT4(b), 5-HT4(c), and 5-HT4(d) (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Hoyer and Martin 1997Go). These splice variants display an identical pharmacological profile and show a similar ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in the presence of 5-HT (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Blondel et al. 1998Go). 5-HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) were previously designated as 5-HT4S and 5-HT4L for the short and long form of the receptor, respectively (Hoyer and Martin 1997Go). 5-HT3 receptors are the only ligand-gated ion channel receptors in the 5-HT receptor family, which are nonselectively permeable to cations such as Na+, Ca2+, and K+ (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Hoyer et al. 2002Go). It has been shown that mRNA that code 5-HT2 (particularly 5-HT2C) and 5-HT4 (particularly 5-HT4(a)) receptors is highly expressed in the STN (Pompeiano et al. 1994Go; Vilaro et al. 1996Go; Wright et al. 1995Go). However, no studies have reported the presence of 5-HT3 receptors in the STN.

In this study, we used several agonists and antagonists to determine 5-HT receptor subtypes involved in 5-HT action in STN neurons. First, we examined the effect of 5-HT3 receptor agonist mCPBG. Local application of mCPBG had no effect on firing frequency of STN neurons. It is not likely that the failure to obtain the 5-HT3 receptor–mediated action was due to a rapid desensitization of 5-HT3 receptors (Yakel and Jackson 1988Go; Yang et al. 1992Go), because the local application technique we used allowed relatively fast solution exchange. In addition, other studies have shown that even with bath application of mCPBG, 5-HT3 responses can still be induced (Koyama et al. 2000Go; Zhou and Hablitz 1999Go). Thus we concluded that the 5-HT3 receptor was not involved in 5-HT–mediated excitation in the STN.

We then examined the effect of {alpha}-m-5-HT on firing of STN neurons. {alpha}-m-5-HT is usually used as a 5-HT2 receptor agonist, which has higher affinity for 5-HT2B/2C receptors than for 5-HT2A receptors (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Baxter et al., 1995Go). In addition, {alpha}-m-5-HT also shows a good affinity for 5-HT4 receptors (Gerald et al. 1995Go). At the concentration (20 µM) used in this study, {alpha}-m-5-HT would likely to have acted on all three 5-HT2 receptor subtypes, as well as 5-HT4 receptors. We found that {alpha}-m-5-HT mimicked the action of 5-HT. Quantitative analysis revealed that the magnitude of increase in firing frequency by {alpha}-m-5-HT was comparable with that induced by 5-HT, suggesting that 5-HT action was mediated by 5-HT2 and/or 5-HT4 receptors. To further dissect the subtypes involved in this action, we examined the effect of DOI, a 5-HT2 receptor agonist with similar affinity for all three 5-HT2 receptor subtypes (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Baxter et al., 1995Go). We found that DOI was less effective than 5-HT or {alpha}-m-5-HT. This observation suggested that the 5-HT action was partially mediated by 5-HT2 receptors. To substantiate this notion, we applied ketanserin, a commonly used 5-HT2 receptor antagonist with about two orders of magnitude more selective for the 5-HT2A receptors than 5-HT2B/2C receptors (Barnes and Sharp 1999Go; Baxter et al. 1995Go). At the concentration of 10 µM used in this study, it would block all three subtypes of 5-HT2 receptors. We found that preperfusion with ketanserin failed to prevent the 5-HT action. This result confirmed the idea that activation of 5-HT2 receptors could only account for a part of the 5-HT action.

To determine whether 5-HT4 receptors have also participated in the 5-HT–induced excitation, we examined the effect of a 5-HT4 receptor agonist cisapride (Briejer et al. 1993Go) and the effect of a 5-HT4 receptor antagonist RS 23597-190 (Eglen et al. 1993Go, 1995Go) on the 5-HT action. We found that an application of cisapride caused an increase in firing frequency. However, the action of cisapride was less effective than 5-HT or {alpha}-m-5-HT. On the other hand, an application of RS 23597-190 partially antagonized the action of 5-HT, and an addition of ketanserin to the RS 23597-190–containing perfusate completely reversed the 5-HT action. These results indicated that both 5-HT2 and 5-HT4 receptors were involved in 5-HT–induced excitation in STN neurons.

Last, we also used a 5-HT2C receptor antagonist RS 102221 to determine the contribution of 5-HT2C receptor subtype in 5-HT action. We found that an application of RS 102221 partially reversed the action of 5-HT and that the magnitude of its antagonizing effect of RS 122201 was comparable with that of keranserin. These results suggested that 5-HT2 receptor–mediated component was due to the action of 5-HT2C receptors.

Based on these pharmacological experiments, we concluded that 5-HT4 and 5-HT2C receptors were involved in the excitatory action of 5-HT in STN neurons and that 5-HT4 and 5-HT2C receptor subtypes may be co-localized in a single STN neuron. Since RS 23597-190 was more effective than ketanserin or RS 122201, we further concluded that most of the 5-HT effect was mediated by 5-HT4 receptors.

5-HT2 receptor–mediated excitation has been reported in a variety of brain regions. Evidence suggests that in some of these cases the excitation is attributed to 5-HT2A receptors in the neurons in the pyriform cortex and neocortex (Araneda and Andrade 1991Go; Marek and Aghajanian 1994Go; Sheldon and Aghajanian 1991Go), whereas others involve 5-HT2C receptors in the neurons in the pyriform cortex, substantia nigra pars reticulate, hypothalamus, and nucleus tractus solitarius (Eriksson et al. 2001Go; Rick et al. 1995Go; Sevoz-Couche et al. 2000Go; Sheldon and Aghajanian 1991Go). As for the mechanism of the action of these receptors, the 5-HT2A receptor–mediated excitation is mainly associated with a decrease in potassium conductances (Aghajanian 1995Go; Zhang 2003Go). There are also reports suggesting that the excitatory responses to 5-HT2C receptor activation are mediated by the closing of potassium channels (Panicker et al. 1991Go) or by activation of Na+/Ca2+-exchange (Eriksson et al. 2001Go). Activation of 5-HT4 receptors has also been shown to reduce potassium conductances and to enhance membrane depolarization in CNS neurons (Bockaert et al. 1992Go; Fagni et al. 1992Go). Our results agree with the above studies concerning the reduction of potassium conductances underlying 5-HT2C and 5-HT4 receptor–mediated excitation. On the other hand, we failed to detect a 5-HT4 receptor–mediated broadening of action potentials by inhibiting a voltage-gated potassium current reported in mouse colliculi neurons (Ansanay et al. 1995Go). In contrast, our data indicated that 5-HT4 receptor–mediated action had no effect on repolarization of action potentials in STN neurons. It is interesting to note that an activation of 5-HT4 receptor results in an increase in IH in hippocampal neurons (Bickmeyer et al. 2002Go), whereas in a similar preparation, 5-HT4 receptor-mediated depolarization was shown to be independent of IH (Chapin et al. 2002Go). Our results showed that 5-HT did not enhance IH or change the activation curve (Fig. 5). Furthermore, in the presence of the IH blocker ZD 7288, 5-HT4 receptor agonist cisapride was still able to induce an inward current in STN neurons (data not shown). These data suggested that IH was not engaged in 5-HT4 receptor–mediated excitation in STN neurons.

In addition to 5-HT2, 5-HT4, and 5-HT3 receptors, 5-HT7 receptors were recently shown to mediate membrane potential depolarization in thalamic neurons by acting on IH (Chapin and Andrade 2001a, bGo). However, our preliminary study revealed that 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB 269970 (10 µM) had no effect on 5-HT–induced increase in firing in STN neurons (data not shown), suggesting that the 5-HT7 receptor was not involved in 5-HT action in STN neurons.

In conclusion, our study showed that 5-HT, acting on 5-HT2C and 5-HT4 receptors, 1) depolarizes membrane potential due to a reduction of potassium conductance and 2) leads to an increase in firing frequency without changing firing pattern of STN neurons. STN is the only nucleus in the basal ganglia whose output neurons are excitatory and plays an important role in motor functions (DeLong 1990Go; DeLong et al. 1985Go; Matsumura et al. 1992Go; Wichmann et al. 1994Go). It is interesting to note that serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus have also been implicated in various aspects of motor control (Jacobs and Fornal 1993Go; Steinfels et al. 1983Go; Trulson et al. 1981Go). Anatomical studies have shown that the STN receives serotonergic innervations from the dorsal raphe nucleus (Bobillier et al. 1976Go; Lavoie and Parent 1990Go) and that both the STN and the dorsal raphe nucleus receive inputs from the prefrontal cortex (Kitai and Deniau 1981Go). We may therefore speculate that, on the cortical activation for a specific movement, a group of raphe serotonergic neurons that project to the STN might be activated in concert with STN neurons, which would amplify subthalamic activity, and in turn, facilitate the excitation in the output structures in the basal ganglia, which in turn inhibits the thalamic motor area.


 FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Z. Xiang, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Univ. of Tennessee, Health Science Center, 847 Monroe Ave., Johnson Bldg., Rm. 427, Memphis, TN 38163 (E-mail: zxiang{at}utmem.edu)


 REFERENCES
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Aghajanian GK. Electrophysiology of serotonin receptor subtypes and signal transduction pathways. In: Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress, edited by Bloom FR and Kupfer DJ. New York: Raven Press, 1995, p. 1451–1459.

Albin RL, Young AB, and Penney JB. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci 12: 366–375, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Andrade R and Chaput Y. 5-Hydroxytryptamine4-like receptors mediate the slow excitatory response to serotonin in the rat hippocampus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 257: 930–937, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Andrade R and Nicoll RA. Pharmacologically distinct actions of serotonin on single pyramidal neurones of the rat hippocampus recorded in vitro. J Physiol 394: 99–124, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ansanay H, Dumuis A, Sebben M, Bockaert J, and Fagni L. cAMP-dependent, long-lasting inhibition of a K+ current in mammalian neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 6635–6639, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Araneda R and Andrade R. 5-Hydroxytryptamine2 and 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptors mediate opposing responses on membrane excitability in rat association cortex. Neuroscience 40: 399–412, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Barnes NM and Sharp T. A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 38: 1083–1152, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Baxter G, Kennett G, Blaney F, and Blackburn T. 5-HT2 receptor subtypes: a family re-united? Trends Pharmacol Sci 16: 105–110, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bayliss DA, Li YW, and Talley EM. Effects of serotonin on caudal raphe neurons: inhibition of N- and P/Q-type calcium channels and the afterhyperpolarization. J Neurophysiol 77: 1362–1374, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bayliss DA, Umemiya M, and Berger AJ. Inhibition of N- and P-type calcium currents and the after-hyperpolarization in rat motoneurones by serotonin. J Physiol 485: 635–647, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beck SG, Choi KC, and List TJ. Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptamine1A-mediated hyperpolarization in CA1 and CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263: 350–359, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berger AJ, Bayliss DA, and Viana F. Modulation of neonatal rat hypoglossal motoneuron excitability by serotonin. Neurosci Lett 143: 164–168, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bergman H, Wichmann T, Karmon B, and DeLong MR. The primate subthalamic nucleus. II. Neuronal activity in the MPTP model of parkinsonism. J Neurophysiol 72: 507–520, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bevan MD and Wilson CJ. Mechanisms underlying spontaneous oscillation and rhythmic firing in rat subthalamic neurons. J Neurosci 19: 7617–7628, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bickmeyer U, Heine M, Manzke T, and Richter DW. Differential modulation of I(h) by 5-HT receptors in mouse CA1 hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 16: 209–218, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Blondel O, Gastineau M, Dahmoune Y, Langlois M, and Fischmeister R. Cloning, expression, and pharmacology of four human 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor isoforms produced by alternative splicing in the carboxyl terminus. J Neurochem 70: 2252–2261, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]

Bobillier P, Seguin S, Petitjean F, Salvert D, Touret M, and Jouvet M. The raphe nuclei of the cat brain stem: a topographical atlas of their efferent projections as revealed by autoradiography. Brain Res 113: 449–486, 1976.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bockaert J, Fozard JR, Dumuis A, and Clarke DE. The 5-HT4 receptor: a place in the sun. Trends Pharmacol Sci 13: 141–145, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bonhaus DW, Wong EH, Stefanich E, Kunysz EA, and Eglen RM. Pharmacological characterization of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors in murine brain and ileum using the novel radioligand [3H]RS-42358-197: evidence for receptor heterogeneity. J Neurochem 61: 1927–1932, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]

Briejer MR, Akkermans LM, Meulemans AL, Lefebvre RA, and Schuurkes JA. Cisapride and a structural analogue, R 76,186, are 5-hydroxytryptamine4 (5-HT4) receptor agonists on the guinea-pig colon ascendens. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 347: 464–470, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chapin EM and Andrade R. A 5-HT(7) receptor-mediated depolarization in the anterodorsal thalamus. I. Pharmacological characterization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 297: 395–402, 2001a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chapin EM and Andrade R. A 5-HT(7) receptor-mediated depolarization in the anterodorsal thalamus. II. Involvement of the hyperpolarization-activated current I(h). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 297: 403–409, 2001b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chapin EM, Haj-Dahmane S, Torres G, and Andrade R. The 5-HT(4) receptor-induced depolarization in rat hippocampal neurons is mediated by cAMP but is independent of I(h). Neurosci Lett 324: 1–4, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]

Davies MF, Deisz RA, Prince DA, and Peroutka SJ. Two distinct effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine on single cortical neurons. Brain Res 423: 347–352, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

DeLong MR. Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends Neurosci 13: 281–285, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

DeLong MR, Crutcher MD, and Georgopoulos AP. Primate globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus: functional organization. J Neurophysiol 53: 530–543, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

DeLong MR and Wichmann T. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 49: 142–143, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Derkach V, Surprenant A, and North RA. 5-HT3 receptors are membrane ion channels. Nature 339: 706–709, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eglen RM, Bley K, Bonhaus DW, Clark RD, Hegde SS, Johnson LG, Leung E, and Wong EH. RS 23597–190: a potent and selective 5-HT4 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 110: 119–126, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]

Eglen RM, Wong EH, Dumuis A, and Bockaert J. Central 5-HT4 receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 16: 391–398, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eriksson KS, Stevens DR, and Haas HL. Serotonin excites tuberomammillary neurons by activation of Na(+)/Ca(2+)-exchange. Neuropharmacology 40: 345–351, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Fagni L, Dumuis A, Sebben M, and Bockaert J. The 5-HT4 receptor subtype inhibits K+ current in colliculi neurones via activation of a cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Br J Pharmacol 105: 973–979, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]

Flores G, Rosales MG, Hernandez S, Sierra A, and Aceves J. 5-Hydroxytryptamine increases spontaneous activity of subthalamic neurons in the rat. Neurosci Lett 192: 17–20, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Foehring RC. Serotonin modulates N- and P-type calcium currents in neocortical pyramidal neurons via a membrane-delimited pathway. J Neurophysiol 75: 648–659, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foehring RC, van Brederode JF, Kinney GA, and Spain WJ. Serotonergic modulation of supragranular neurons in rat sensorimotor cortex. J Neurosci 22: 8238–8250, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gerald C, Adham N, Kao HT, Olsen MA, Laz TM, Schechter LE, Bard JA, Vaysse PJ, Hartig PR, and Branchek TA. The 5-HT4 receptor: molecular cloning and pharmacological characterization of two splice variants. EMBO J 14: 2806–2815, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gerhardt CC, and van Heerikhuizen H. Functional characteristics of heterologously expressed 5-HT receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 334: 1–23, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hallworth NE, Wilson CJ, and Bevan MD. Apamin-sensitive small conductance calcium-activated potassium channels, through their selective coupling to voltage-gated calcium channels, are critical determinants of the precision, pace, and pattern of action potential generation in rat subthalamic nucleus neurons in vitro. J Neurosci 23: 7525–7542, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoyer D, Clarke DE, Fozard JR, Hartig PR, Martin GR, Mylecharane EJ, Saxena PR, and Humphrey PP. International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5- hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin). Pharmacol Rev 46: 157–203, 1994.[Abstract]

Hoyer D, Hannon JP, and Martin GR. Molecular, pharmacological and functional diversity of 5-HT receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71: 533–554, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hoyer D and Martin G. 5-HT receptor classification and nomenclature: towards a harmonization with the human genome. Neuropharmacology 36: 419–428, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hsiao CF, Trueblood PR, Levine MS, and Chandler SH. Multiple effects of serotonin on membrane properties of trigeminal motoneurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 77: 2910–2924, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Inoue T, Itoh S, Kobayashi M, Kang Y, Matsuo R, Wakisaka S, and Morimoto T. Serotonergic modulation of the hyperpolarizing spike afterpotential in rat jaw-closing motoneurons by PKA and PKC. J Neurophysiol 82: 626–637, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jacobs BL and Fornal CA. 5-HT and motor control: a hypothesis. Trends Neurosci 16: 346–352, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kawa K. Distribution and functional properties of 5-HT3 receptors in the rat hippocampal dentate gyrus: a patch-clamp study. J Neurophysiol 71: 1935–1947, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kitai ST and Deniau JM. Cortical inputs to the subthalamus: intracellular analysis. Brain Res 214: 411–415, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kitai ST and Kita H. Anatomy and physiology of the subthalamic nucleus: a driving force of the basal ganglia. In: The Basal Ganglia II, edited by Carpenter MB and Jayaraman A. New York: Plenum Publishing, 1987, p. 357–373.

Koyama S, Matsumoto N, Kubo C, and Akaike N. Presynaptic 5-HT3 receptor-mediated modulation of synaptic GABA release in the mechanically dissociated rat amygdala neurons. J Physiol 529: 373–383, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lavoie B and Parent A. Immunohistochemical study of the serotoninergic innervation of the basal ganglia in the squirrel monkey. J Comp Neurol 299: 1–16, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Levy R, Hutchison WD, Lozano AM, and Dostrovsky JO. High-frequency synchronization of neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus of parkinsonian patients with limb tremor. J Neurosci 20: 7766–7775, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lorenzon NM and Foehring RC. Relationship between repetitive firing and afterhyperpolarizations in human neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 67: 350–363, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marek GJ and Aghajanian GK. Excitation of interneurons in piriform cortex by 5-hydroxytryptamine: blockade by MDL 100,907, a highly selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 259: 137–141, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Matsumura M, Kojima J, Gardiner TW, and Hikosaka O. Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey subthalamic nucleus. J Neurophysiol 67: 1615–1632, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McCormick DA and Pape HC. Noradrenergic and serotonergic modulation of a hyperpolarization- activated cation current in thalamic relay neurones. J Physiol 431: 319–342, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McCormick DA and Wang Z. Serotonin and noradrenaline excite GABAergic neurones of the guinea-pig and cat nucleus reticularis thalami. J Physiol 442: 235–255, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McCormick DA, Wang Z, and Huguenard J. Neurotransmitter control of neocortical neuronal activity and excitability. Cereb Cortex 3: 387–398, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McMahon LL and Kauer JA. Hippocampal interneurons are excited via serotonin-gated ion channels. J Neurophysiol 78: 2493–2502, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moore RY, Halaris AE, and Jones BE. Serotonin neurons of the midbrain raphe: ascending projections. J Comp Neurol 180: 417–438, 1978.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mori S, Takino T, Yamada H, and Sano Y. Immunohistochemical demonstration of serotonin nerve fibers in the subthalamic nucleus of the rat, cat and monkey. Neurosci Lett 62: 305–309, 1985.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Obeso JA, Rodriguez MC, Guridi J, Alvarez L, Alvarez E, Macias R, Juncos JL, and DeLong M. Lesion of the basal ganglia and surgery for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 58: 1165–1166, 2001.[Free Full Text]

Palkovits M, Brownstein M, and Saavedra JM. Serotonin content of the brain stem nuclei in the rat. Brain Res 80: 237–249, 1974.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Panicker MM, Parker I, and Miledi R. Receptors of the serotonin 1C subtype expressed from cloned DNA mediate the closing of K+ membrane channels encoded by brain mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 2560–2562, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pollak P, Krack P, Fraix V, Mendes A, Moro E, Chabardes S, and Benabid AL. Intraoperative micro- and macrostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 17 (Suppl 3): S155–S161, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pompeiano M, Palacios JM, and Mengod G. Distribution of the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor family mRNAs: comparison between 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 23: 163–178, 1994.[Medline]

Rick CE, Stanford IM, and Lacey MG. Excitation of rat substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons by 5-hydroxytryptamine in vitro: evidence for a direct action mediated by 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors. Neuroscience 69: 903–913, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Robledo P and Feger J. Excitatory influence of rat subthalamic nucleus to substantia nigra pars reticulata and the pallidal complex: electrophysiological data. Brain Res 518: 47–54, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Roerig B and Katz LC. Modulation of intrinsic circuits by serotonin 5-HT3 receptors in developing ferret visual cortex. J Neurosci 17: 8324–8338, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ropert N and Guy N. Serotonin facilitates GABAergic transmission in the CA1 region of rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol 441: 121–136, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sevoz-Couche C, Spyer KM, and Jordan D. Inhibition of rat nucleus tractus solitarius neurones by activation of 5-HT2C receptors. Neuroreport 11: 1785–1790, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]

Sheldon PW and Aghajanian GK. Excitatory responses to serotonin (5-HT) in neurons of the rat piriform cortex: evidence for mediation by 5-HT1C receptors in pyramidal cells and 5-HT2 receptors in interneurons. Synapse 9: 208–218, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Smith Y and Parent A. Neurons of the subthalamic nucleus in primates display glutamate but not GABA immunoreactivity. Brain Res 453: 353–356, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Steinbusch HW. Distribution of serotonin-immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of the rat-cell bodies and terminals. Neuroscience 6: 557–618, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Steinfels GF, Heym J, Strecker RE, and Jacobs BL. Raphe unit activity in freely moving cats is altered by manipulations of central but not peripheral motor systems. Brain Res 279: 77–84, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tanaka E and North RA. Actions of 5-hydroxytryptamine on neurons of the rat cingulate cortex. J Neurophysiol 69: 1749–1757, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Torres GE, Holt IL, and Andrade R. Antagonists of 5-HT4 receptor-mediated responses in adult hippocampal neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271: 255–261, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Trulson ME, Jacobs BL, and Morrison AR. Raphe unit activity during REM sleep in normal cats and in pontine lesioned cats displaying REM sleep without atonia. Brain Res 226: 75–91, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Vilaro MT, Cortes R, Gerald C, Branchek TA, Palacios JM, and Mengod G. Localization of 5-HT4 receptor mRNA in rat brain by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 43: 356–360, 1996.[Medline]

Wichmann T, Bergman H, and DeLong MR. The primate subthalamic nucleus. I. Functional properties in intact animals. J Neurophysiol 72: 494–506, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wichmann T and DeLong MR. Functional and pathophysiological models of the basal ganglia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6: 751–758, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wichmann T and DeLong MR. Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease: the MPTP primate model of the human disorder. Ann NY Acad Sci 991: 199–213, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]

Wright DE, Seroogy KB, Lundgren KH, Davis BM, and Jennes L. Comparative localization of serotonin1A, 1C, and 2 receptor subtype mRNAs in rat brain. J Comp Neurol 351: 357–373, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Xiang Z and Prince DA. Heterogeneous actions of serotonin on interneurons in rat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 89: 1278–1287, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yakel JL and Jackson MB. 5-HT3 receptors mediate rapid responses in cultured hippocampus and a clonal cell line. Neuron 1: 615–621, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yang J, Mathie A, and Hille B. 5-HT3 receptor channels in dissociated rat superior cervical ganglion neurons. J Physiol 448: 237–256, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang ZW. Serotonin induces tonic firing in layer V pyramidal neurons of rat prefrontal cortex during postnatal development. J Neurosci 23: 3373–3384, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhou FM and Hablitz JJ. Activation of serotonin receptors modulates synaptic transmission in rat cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 82: 2989–2999, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. E. Benarroch
Serotonergic modulation of basal ganglia circuits: Complexity and therapeutic opportunities
Neurology, September 15, 2009; 73(11): 880 - 886.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. J. Yu and A. Yamaguchi
5-HT2C-Like Receptors in the Brain of Xenopus laevis Initiate Sex-Typical Fictive Vocalizations
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 752 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Ptak, T. Yamanishi, J. Aungst, L. S. Milescu, R. Zhang, G. B. Richerson, and J. C. Smith
Raphe Neurons Stimulate Respiratory Circuit Activity by Multiple Mechanisms via Endogenously Released Serotonin and Substance P
J. Neurosci., March 25, 2009; 29(12): 3720 - 3737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Belujon, E. Bezard, A. Taupignon, B. Bioulac, and A. Benazzouz
Noradrenergic Modulation of Subthalamic Nucleus Activity: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence in Intact and 6-Hydroxydopamine-Lesioned Rats
J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9595 - 9606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Wang, S. T. Kitai, and Z. Xiang
Activity-dependent bidirectional modification of inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat subthalamic neurons.
J. Neurosci., July 12, 2006; 26(28): 7321 - 7327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Kitai, S. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the The American Physiological Society.