|
|
||||||||
EDITORIAL FOCUS
30 s after the previous reward. The rats clearly learned to anticipate the reward as their lever presses clustered just before the end of the required 30-s inter-reward period. However, after more than an hour at this task, rats became "disengaged" in that they "stopped" anticipating the arrival of the reward period by a cluster of lever presses. Strikingly, the gustatory µ rhythm appeared only during the disengagement phase when rats switched to a low-frequency random pattern of lever pressings. During tasting or lever pressing the µ rhythm was always absent indicating that this rhythm has nothing to do with sensory processing per se.
The idea that the µ rhythm in the somatosensory system may encode sensory information and set temporal processing domains (Nicolelis et al. 1995
) is attractive. But do the 5- to 12-Hz rhythms in somatosensory and gustatory cortices really have disparate functions? It seems more reasonable that the somatosensory µ rhythm may also reflect an "idling" state during quiet immobility and, as in the gustatory cortex, that this network oscillation is not directly involved in sensory processing but is permissive to sensory activation. In fact, rats respond as rapidly and reliably to vibrissal stimulation during periods dominated by µ rhythm as during non-oscillatory periods (Wiest and Nicolelis 2003
). This observation suggests that the somatosensory µ rhythm does not reflect an epileptic state because its presence does not impair perception. Similarly, the fact that in the Fontanini and Katz (2005)
experiments, rats licked and swallowed tastants delivered during gustatory cortex 5- to 12-Hz oscillatory periods distinguishes these events from epileptic episodes. So, if the 5- to 12-Hz oscillations recorded in gustatory cortex resemble spike and wave oscillations characteristic of absence seizures but are not absence seizures, then what are they? Fontanini and Katz (2005)
favor the idea that the µ rhythm represents an "idling" state and propose that absence seizures represent a condition of protracted and extreme disengagement.
µ oscillations, like spindles, are associated with bursting of thalamic neurons (Fanselow et al. 2001
) and may represent an attractor state for thalamo-cortical networks in the absence of focused attention. At the macroscopic level, a particular neuronal network may generate similar patterns even if the underlying contribution by the network cell's intrinsic and synaptic properties are quite diverse (Prinz et al. 2004
). While it is possible that there is no particular functional meaning to the µ rhythm beyond idling, it seems more reasonable that perhaps bursting of thalamo-cortical neurons during µ oscillations represents a self-maintenance or homeostatic phase of cortical networks so that they are ready when sensory processing is actively needed. In hippocampal networks, quiet immobility is also associated with periods of high-frequency oscillations (termed hippocampal "ripples") (Buzsáki et al. 1992
) that resemble epileptiform events but that are normal network phenomena (Bragin et al. 1999
). Hippocampal ripples may play a very important role in synaptic plasticity and the transfer of hippocampal memory signals to the cortical mantle (Buzsáki 1996
). Interestingly, it has recently been shown that hippocampal ripples and sleep-spindles in the somatosensory cortex are highly correlated events (Sirota et al. 2003
) likely reflecting temporal windows with a high degree of hippocampal-neocortical intercommunication. It would thus be interesting to know the potential relationship between the gustatory µ rhythm and hippocampal oscillatory activities.
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: Dept. of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada (E-mail: angel.alonso{at}McGill.ca)
REFERENCES
Bragin A, Engel J Jr, Wilson CL, Fried I, and Buzsaki G. High-frequencyoscillations in human brain. Hippocampus 9: 137142, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Buzsáki G. The hippocampo-neocortical dialogue. Cereb Cortex 6: 8192, 1996.
Buzsáki G, Horvath Z, Urioste R, Hetke J, and Wise K. High-frequency networkoscillation in the hippocampus. Science 256: 10251027, 1992.
Fanselow EE and Nicolelis MA. Behavioral modulation of tactile responses in the ratsomatosensory system. J Neurosci 19: 76037616, 1999.
Fanselow EE, Sameshima K, Baccala LA, and Nicolelis MA. Thalamic bursting in ratsduring different awake behavioral states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1533015335, 2001.
Fontanini A and Katz DB. 712 Hz activity in rat gustatory cortex reflects disengagement from a fluid self administration task. J Neurophysiol 93: 28322840, 2005.
Gastaut H. Electrocorticographic study of the reactivity of rolandic rhythm. Rev Neurol (Paris) 87: 176182, 1952.[Medline]
Nicolelis MA, Baccala LA, Lin RC, and Chapin JK. Sensorimotor encoding bysynchronous neural ensemble activity at multiple levels of the somatosensory system. Science 268: 13531358, 1995.
Prinz AA, Bucher D, and Marder E. Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 7: 13451352, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shaw FZ. Is spontaneous high-voltage rhythmic spike discharge in Long Evans rats anabsence-like seizure activity? J Neurophysiol 91: 6377, 2004.
Sirota A, Csicsvari J, Buhl D, and Buzsaki G. Communication between neocortex andhippocampus during sleep in rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 20652069, 2003.
Wiest MC and Nicolelis MA. Behavioral detection of tactile stimuli during 712 Hzcortical oscillations in awake rats. Nat Neurosci 6: 913914, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |