| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
EDITORIAL FOCUS
), and motor control (Geffen et al. 1994). In the motor domain, interhemispheric inhibitory interactions (IHI) operate between homonymous body part representations in the primary motor cortices (M1) (Ferbert et al. 1992). IHI appears to be mediated to a large extent through transcallosal excitatory connections that terminate on inhibitory interneurons (Daskalakis et al. 2002b; Di Lazzaro et al. 1999; Ferbert et al. 1992; Gerloff et al. 1998). Patients with unilateral brain lesions have abnormally persistent IHI from the intact to the affected hemisphere in the process of generating a voluntary paretic hand movement (Murase et al. 2004). On the other side of the spectrum, decreased IHI has been reported in patients with schizophrenia (Daskalakis et al. 2002a) and epilepsy (Hanajima et al. 2001). Patients with multiple sclerosis (Boroojerdi et al. 1998; Schmierer et al. 2002), schizophrenia (Bajbouj et al. 2004; Boroojerdi et al. 1999), focal hand dystonia (Niehaus et al. 2001), and parkinsonian syndromes (Wolters et al. 2004) have abnormal ipsilateral silent periods, another marker of transcallosal interactions. In some cases, the severity of clinical impairment correlated with the magnitude of IHI abnormality (Murase et al. 2004; Schmierer et al. 2002). These findings led to the hypothesis that correction of IHI abnormalities may result in clinical gains. In an interesting report in this issue of the Journal of Neurophysiology (p. 1668–1675), Pal and colleagues (2005) describe a possible strategy to manipulate IHI. Downregulation of activity in one motor cortex using 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (Chen et al. 1997) results in decreased IHI over the opposite motor cortex that outlasts the period of stimulation.
Pal et al. (2005) studied IHI at rest using a paired-pulse technique. A suprathreshold conditioning TMS stimulus (CS) applied to one M1 is followed a few milliseconds later by a second suprathreshold test stimulus (TS) delivered to the opposite M1 (Ferbert et al. 1992). IHI is calculated as the amplitude ratio of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) elicited by the combination of CS+TS to the MEP elicited by the unconditioned TS alone. This technique allows the noninvasive evaluation of interhemispheric inhibition in humans, providing complementary information to that obtained using functional neuroimaging, EEG and MEG in cognitive neuroscience. Pal et al. (2005) now demonstrate the possibility of modulating IHI in healthy human subjects using inhibitory 1-Hz rTMS. These findings provide a methodological tool to explore a variety of exciting hypotheses in human motor control and cognitive processing.
For example, this approach could be used in cognitive neurology and neurophysiology to modulate interhemispheric interactions in patients with hemispatial neglect (Brighina et al. 2003), tactile extinction (Oliveri et al. 1999), and aphasia (Martin et al. 2004). The mechanisms underlying these behavioral effects could be the re-establishment of a proper balance of IHI. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying IHI, as explored in this paper, is a condition to facilitate the development of rationale strategies to purposefully modulate IHI in disease states.
Human Cortical Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. G. Cohen, Human Cortical Physiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 10 Center Dr., MSC 1428, Building 10, Rm 5N226, Bethesda, MD 20892 (E-mail: cohenl{at}ninds.nih.gov)
REFERENCES
Bajbouj M, Gallinat J, Niehaus L, Lang UE, Roricht S, and Meyer BU. Abnormalities of inhibitory neuronal mechanisms in the motor cortex of patients with schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 37: 74–80, 2004.[Medline]
Boroojerdi B, Hungs M, Mull M, Topper R, and Noth J. Interhemispheric inhibition in patients with multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109: 230–237, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boroojerdi B, Topper R, Foltys H, and Meincke U. Transcallosal inhibition and motor conduction studies in patients with schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Br J Psychiatry 175: 375–379, 1999.
Brighina F, Bisiach E, Oliveri M, Piazza A, La Bua B, Daniele O, and Fierro B. One-hertz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans. Neurosci Lett 336: 131–133, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, Hallett M, and Cohen LG. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 48: 1398–1403, 1997.[Abstract]
Daskalakis ZJ, Christensen BK, Chen R, Fitzgerald PB, Zipursky RB, and Kapur S. Evidence for impaired cortical inhibition in schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59: 347–354, 2002a.
Daskalakis ZJ, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Roshan L, and Chen R. The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 15: 317–326, 2002b.
Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, and Rothwell JC. Direct demonstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 124: 520–524, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ferbert A, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Colebatch JG, and Marsden CD. Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 453: 525–546, 1992.
Gazzaniga MS. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123: 1293–1326, 2000.
Geffen GM, Jones DL, and Geffen LB. Interhemispheric control of manual motor activity. Behav Brain Res 20: 131–140, 1994.
Gerloff C, Cohen LG, Floeter MK, Chen R, Corwell B, and Hallett M. Inhibitory influence of the ipsilateral cortex on responses to stimulation of the human cortex and pyramidal tract. J Physiol 510: 249–259, 1998.
Hanajima R, Ugawa Y, Okabe S, Yuasa K, Shiio Y, Iwata NK, and Kanazawa I. Interhemispheric interaction between the hand motor areas in patients with cortical myclonus. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 623–626, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, Tormos JM, Nicholas M, Kurland J, Fregni F, Seekins H, Doron K, and Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 25: 181–191, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, and Cohen LG. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 55: 400–409, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Niehaus L, von Alt-Stutterheim K, Roricht S, and Meyer BU. Abnormal postexcitatory and interhemispheric motor cortex inhibition in writer's cramp. J Neurol 248: 51–56, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Filippi MM, Pasqualetti P, Tomaiuolo F, and Caltagirone C. Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. Brain 122: 1731–1739, 1999.
Pal PK, Hanajima R, Gunraj CA, Li J-Y, Wagle-Shukla A, Mogante F, and Chen R. Effect of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition. J Neurophysiol 94: 1668–1675, 2005.
Schmierer K, Irlbacher K, Grosse P, Roricht S, and Meyer BU. Correlates of disability in multiple sclerosis detected by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 59: 1218–1224, 2002.
Wolters A, Classen J, Kunesch E, Grossmann A, and Benecke R. Measurements of transcallosally mediated cortical inhibition for differentiating parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord 19: 518–528, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
