JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 94: 1992-2003, 2005. First published June 8, 2005; doi:10.1152/jn.00171.2005
0022-3077/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/1992    most recent
00171.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giustizieri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Berretta, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giustizieri, M.
Right arrow Articles by Berretta, N.

Distinct Mechanisms of Presynaptic Inhibition at GABAergic Synapses of the Rat Substantia Nigra Pars Compacta

Michela Giustizieri1, Giorgio Bernardi1,2, Nicola B. Mercuri1,2 and Nicola Berretta1

1Centro Europeo di Ricerca sul Cervello Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico; and 2Department of Neuroscience, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Submitted 17 February 2005; accepted in final form 2 June 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
We investigated the mechanisms of presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic neurotransmission by group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and GABAB receptors, in dopamine (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Both the group III mGluRs agonist L-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (AP4, 100 µM) and the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen (10 µM) reversibly depressed the frequency of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) to 48.5 ± 2.7 and 79.3 ± 1.6% (means ± SE) of control, respectively. On the contrary, the frequency of action potential-independent miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs), recorded in tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 µM) and cadmium (100 µM) were insensitive to AP4 but were reduced by baclofen to 49.7 ± 8.6% of control. When the contribution of voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs) to synaptic transmission was boosted with external barium (1 mM), AP4 became effective in reducing TTX-resistant mIPSCs to 65.4 ± 3.9% of control, thus confirming a mechanism of presynaptic inhibition involving modulation of VDCCs. Differently from AP4, baclofen inhibited to 58.5 ± 6.7% of control the frequency mIPSCs recorded in TTX and the calcium ionophore ionomycin (2 µM), which promotes Ca2+-dependent, but VDCC-independent, transmitter release. Moreover, in the presence of {alpha}-latrotoxin (0.3 nM), to promote a Ca2+-independent vesicular release of GABA, baclofen reduced mIPSC frequency to 48.1 ± 3.2% of control, while AP4 was ineffective. These results indicate that group III mGluRs depress GABA release to DA neurons of the SNc through inhibition of presynaptic VDCCs, while presynaptic GABAB receptors directly impair transmitter exocytosis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Presynaptic inhibition is a mechanism of modulation commonly observed at most synapses of the central and peripheral nervous system. It is initiated in response to activation of a wide range of presynaptic receptors and leads to reduction in the probability of vesicle fusion onto the presynaptic membrane (Wu and Saggau 1997Go). Although reduction in the amount of released neurotransmitter in response to action potentials invading the presynaptic terminal is the final outcome of any form of presynaptic inhibition, the intracellular mechanisms responsible for such an effect may vary depending on the receptors involved or synaptic location. The most common mechanism of action consists in inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs) located on the presynaptic boutons. This leads to a reduced elevation in intracellular Ca2+ after action potential invasion of the terminal, thus reducing the efficacy of the Ca2+-dependent exocytotic machinery. This mechanism of action has been demonstrated in response to activation of a variety of presynaptic receptors, in particular mGluRs (Capogna 2004Go; Scanziani et al. 1995Go; Takahashi et al. 1996Go; Zhang and Schmidt 1999Go) and GABAB receptors (Chen and van den Pol 1998Go; Isaacson 1998Go; Takahashi et al. 1998Go; Wu and Saggau 1995Go). However, additional mechanisms of presynaptic inhibition have been proposed involving a direct impairment of transmitter exocytosis. Indeed, activation of presynaptic receptors can reduce the frequency of miniature postsynaptic currents even when extracellular Ca2+ is removed or Ca2+ channels are blocked by cadmium (Dittman and Regehr 1996Go; Doi et al. 2002Go; Kolaj et al. 2004Go; Rohrbacher et al. 1997Go; Scanziani et al. 1992Go). Furthermore, stimulation of presynaptic receptors may reduce the frequency of miniature postsynaptic currents triggered by toxins like the lanthanide gadolinium and {alpha}-latrotoxin (Capogna et al. 1996bGo), which induce neurotransmitter release independently of Ca2+ influx through VDCCs (Capogna et al. 1996aGo). Therefore presynaptic inhibition of evoked synaptic transmission may also directly target the recruitment of synaptic vesicle in the terminal, downstream of Ca2+ influx (Sakaba and Neher 2003Go).

We have focused our attention on two previously described forms of presynaptic inhibition at GABAergic synapses of dopamine (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), mediated by glutamate and GABA, through activation of mGluRs (Bonci et al. 1997Go) and GABAB receptors (Hausser and Yung 1994Go), respectively. Midbrain DA neurons are part of the basal ganglia circuitry and play an essential role in motor control as well as in cognitive functions and affective behaviors (Groenewegen 2003Go; Montague et al. 1996Go; Pillon et al. 2003Go). The great majority of synapses to these neurons are GABAergic (Smith and Bolam 1990Go), arising from local GABAergic networks, the pallidum, the striatum, and the nucleus accumbens (Grofova et al. 1982Go; Haber et al. 1985Go; Smith and Bolam 1990Go; Tepper et al. 1995Go; Walaas and Fonnum 1980Go). These synaptic inputs provide a tonic inhibition to DA neurons and control their firing activity (Celada et al. 1999Go; Collingridge and Davies 1981Go; Engberg et al. 1993Go; Paldini and Tepper 1999Go; Paladini et al. 1999Go). Glutamatergic axons are also present in this area, originating from the cortex, the subthalamic, and pedunculopuntine nuclei (Hammond et al. 1978Go; Scarnati et al. 1986Go; Sesack et al. 1989Go) and contribute with their pre- and postsynaptic actions to the modulation of DA neurons excitability, such that alteration in the glutamatergic neurotransmission in this area is thought to be associated to basal ganglia disorders, like Parkinson’s disease (Greenamyre 2001Go; Rouse et al. 2000Go). The discovery that both mGluRs and GABAB receptors depress VDCCs in GABAergic neurons projecting to the ventral midbrain (Stefani et al.1994Go, 1996Go, 1999Go) has prompted the hypothesis that both receptors exert their functional role of presynaptic inhibition at GABAergic synapses of the SNc through a converging mechanism of inhibition of presynaptic VDCCs, but evidence exists in midbrain embryonic cultures of a VDCC-independent mechanism of action by GABAB receptors (Jarolimek and Misgeld 1992Go; Rohrbacher et al. 1997Go). We now present an in-depth investigation of the mechanism of presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic synapses to DA neurons of the SNc in response to group III mGluRs and GABAB receptor stimulation. This characterization provides new insights into the role of these presynaptic receptors in the processing of information in the SNc and their potential target in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Wistar rats (18–25 days old) were anesthetized by inhalation of 2-bromo-2-chloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane and killed by decapitation. All experiments follow international guidelines on the ethical use of animals from the European Communities Council Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC). The brain was rapidly removed, and a tissue block containing the midbrain was immersed in artificial cerebrospinal fluid solution (ACSF) composed of (in mM) 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, and 11 glucose; saturated with 95% O2-5% CO2 (pH 7.4, 303 mosM). Horizontal slices (250 µm) of the ventral midbrain, containing the substantia nigra, were cut at 8–10°C using a vibratome (Leica VT1000S, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). After an incubation period of 1 h in ACSF at 33.5°C, a single slice was transferred to a submerged recording chamber (2.5–3 ml/min, 33.5°C), on the stage of an upright microscope (Axioscop FS, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany), equipped for infrared video microscopy (Hamamatsu, Tokyo), allowing a direct visualization of the recorded neurons.

Electrophysiology

Presumed dopamine neurons were recorded in whole cell patch-clamp configuration using 1.5-mm borosilicate glass electrodes (3–4 M{Omega}), pulled with a vertical puller (PP-83 Narishige) and filled with (in mM) 133 CsCl, 2 MgCl2, 0.1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, and 10 QX-314; pH adjusted to 7.3 with CsOH (280 mosM). Membrane currents were recorded in voltage-clamp mode at a holding potential of –60 mV, using a differential amplifier (Multiclamp 700A, Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Signals were filtered at 1 kHz, digitized at 10 kHz with Digidata 1320 (Axon Instruments), and acquired with the pClamp9 software (Axon Instruments). No series resistance compensation was implemented, to keep a low signal-to-noise ratio, however, series resistance and whole cell capacitance were monitored continuously during the experiment, and recordings were discarded if series resistance changed by >15% from control conditions. Evoked synaptic responses were elicited at 0.033 Hz, using a bipolar stainless steel stimulating electrode (FHC, Bowdoinham, ME), close to the recorded cell.

Data analysis

Evoked and spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were analyzed off-line using the pClamp9 software package (Axon Instruments). Spontaneous and miniature events were detected through an algorithm based on the minimization of the sum of squared errors between data and a template function. Single-template waveforms were created by averaging a number of spontaneous events, following visual inspection of a representative trace in each cell. The template matching threshold was set between 5 and 5.5, providing a good balance to avoid detection of false events. Data are expressed as means ± SE. To statistically evaluate the effects on evoked responses, a two-tailed Student t-test was used to compare the mean amplitude of evoked synaptic currents in control conditions and during the last 2 min of experimental challenge, using P < 0.05 as threshold for statistical significance. Changes in spontaneous events amplitude or interevent interval was determined in each single neuron by comparison of their cumulative distributions, with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test, using P < 0.02 as threshold for statistical significance. Group analysis of variations in amplitude and interevent interval of spontaneous events in all neurons exposed to a specific experimental challenge were evaluated using the two-tailed Student t-test, using P < 0.05 as threshold for statistical significance.

Drugs

Drugs used were 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), D-(–)-2-amino-5-phosphonoeptanoic acid (AP5), baclofen, L-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (AP4), (RS)-a-methyl-4-sulfonophenylglycine (MSPG), and (2S)-3-[[(1S)-1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino-2-hydroxipropyl](phenylmethyl) phosphinic acid (CGP 55845) from Tocris Cookson (Bristol, UK); tetrodotoxin (TTX) and {alpha}-latrotoxin ({alpha}-LTX) from Alomone Labs (Jerusalem, Israel); ionomycin (free acid, streptomyces conglobatus), from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Drugs were prepared in stock solutions (x1,000) of distilled water, except for {alpha}-LTX dissolved in 50% glycerol, and bath applied.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Whole cell patch-clamp recordings were obtained from a total of 136 neurons located within the SNc. The Cs+- and QX-314-containing filling solution in the patch electrodes precluded any meaningful electrophysiological identification of the recorded neurons on the basis of an Ih current or postsynaptic response to dopamine (Mercuri et al. 1992Go; Perkins and Wong 1995Go); however, when spontaneous current spikes were observed in cell-attached mode, they never exceed the basal frequency of 1–3 Hz, typical of the DA neurons (Grace and Onn 1989Go). Moreover, cells were visually identified as presumed DAergic neurons on the basis of their location closed to the medial terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract and their typical fusiform cell body and long unbranched proximal dendrites, extending in the plane of the slice (Grace and Onn 1989Go). All experiments were performed in the continuous presence of the glutamate ionotropic receptor antagonists CNQX (10 µM) and AP5 (50 µM). Moreover, any postsynaptic response due to opening of K+ conductances was prevented by the internal dialysis with CsCl and QX-314 through the patch pipette.

Effect of AP4 and baclofen on evoked IPSCs

Synaptic responses were evoked by means of a stimulating electrode placed within the substantia nigra. They consisted of a fast IPSC, mediated by GABAA receptors, as it was completely blocked by picrotoxin (100 µM; not shown). Bath perfusion of the selective group III mGluRs agonist AP4 (Schoepp et al. 1999Go) resulted in a reversible IPSC depression, that attained a maximal effect of 53.0 ± 7.5% of control, at a concentration of 100 µM (P < 0.01, paired Student’s t-test, n = 10; Fig. 1B). The group II/III mGluRs antagonist MSPG (Jane et al. 1995Go) prevented AP4 effect (Fig. 1A). Thus IPSC amplitude in MSPG (100 µM) and AP4 (100 µM) was 95.7 ± 7.7% of control in MSPG alone (P > 0.9, paired Student’s t-test, n = 4). The effect of AP4 was consistent with previous observations showing a similar degree of AP4-induced depression, reaching a plateau at concentrations >30 µM (Bonci et al. 1997Go). IPSC amplitude was also inhibited (15.3 ± 3.2% of control; P < 0.01, paired Student’s t-test, n = 9) by the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen (10 µM; Fig. 1D), and this effect was prevented by the selective GABAB receptor antagonist CGP 55845 (Fig. 1C). IPSC amplitude in CGP 55845 (1 µM) and baclofen (10 µM) was 95.5 ± 11.0% of control in CGP 55845 alone (P > 0.5, paired Student’s t-test, n = 4).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Group III mGluRs and GABAB receptors depress evoked GABAergic transmission. Bath perfusion of 100 µM L-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (AP4, A) or 10 µM baclofen (C) reversibly depressed inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) evoked with a stimulating electrode placed in closed proximity to the recorded neuron. IPSC inhibition by AP4 or baclofen was reversibly prevented by preexposure to (RS)-a-methyl-4-sulfonophenylglycine (MSPG, 100 µM; A) or (2S)-3-[[(1S)-1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]amino-2-hydroxipropyl](phenylmethyl) phosphinic acid (CGP 55845, 1 µM; C), respectively. Top: evoked IPSCs are shown, acquired at the times indicated by the corresponding numbers in the plots. B and D: plots show the normalized IPSC amplitude (mean ± SE) in response to 100 µM AP4 (B; n = 10) or 10 µM baclofen (D; n = 9).

 
Effect of AP4 and baclofen on sIPSCs

To explore in greater detail the mechanism of presynaptic inhibition by group III mGluRs and GABAB receptors in this area, we examined the effects of AP4 and baclofen on sIPSCs. In each tested neuron (n = 10) AP4 (100 µM) caused a reversible rightward shift of the interevent cumulative distribution (P < 0.01, K-S test), that was associated, in 4 of 10 neurons, to reduction of sIPSC amplitude (P < 0.01, K-S test; Fig. 2, A and B). Overall, AP4 (100 µM) caused a significant increase in sIPSC interevent interval (P < 0.001, paired Student’s t-test, n = 10), associated to a small but non significant reduction of their amplitude (P > 0.07 paired Student’s t-test, n = 10; Fig. 2B, Table 1).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Group III mGluRs and GABAB receptors depress spontaneous GABAergic transmission. Successive sample traces of spontaneous IPSCs (sIPSCs) are shown in A before (left), during (middle), and after (right) perfusion of 100 µM AP4. B: amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) cumulative distributions of the sIPSCs recorded from the cell in A. In this cell, AP4 significantly increased sIPSCs interevent interval (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and decreased their amplitude distribution (P < 0.01, K-S test). Insets: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of sIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from a total of 10 neurons (****P < 0.001, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test). C: traces of sIPSCs acquired before, during and after perfusion of 10 µM baclofen. In this cell, interevent intervals of sIPSCs (D, right) increased significantly in baclofen (P < 0.0001, K-S test), and their amplitude (D, left) decreased (P < 0.001, K-S test). Insets: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of sIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from a total of 8 neurons (**P < 0.02, ****P < 0.001, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Summary data of spontaneous and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents amplitude and interevent interval in different experimental conditions, before and after AP4 (100 µM) or baclofen (10 µM) perfusion

 
Perfusion of baclofen (10 µM) caused in each cell (n = 8) a reversible rightward shift of the interevent cumulative distribution (P < 0.0001, K-S test), that was associated, in three of eight neurons, to reduction of sIPSC amplitude (P < 0.001, K-S test; Fig. 2, C and D). Overall, both the reduction of sIPSC amplitude and the increase in their interevent interval was statistically significant (P < 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively, paired Student’s t-test, n = 10; Fig. 2D, Table 1).

Effect of AP4 and baclofen on mIPSCs

The effects of AP4 and baclofen on GABAergic transmission were further explored by looking at the effects of these agonists on action potential-independent miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs). In the presence of TTX (1 µM), in two only, of nine neurons, 100 µM AP4 significantly increased (P < 0.0001, K-S test) mIPSC interevent interval, without changing mIPSC amplitude (P > 0.1, K-S test). Thus no significant change resulted from group comparison of both mIPSC amplitude (P > 0.3, paired Student’s t-test, n = 9) and interevent interval (P > 0.3, paired Student’s t-test, n = 9; Table 1).

By contrast, baclofen (10 µM) was still effective in reducing GABAergic transmission in the presence of TTX (1 µM). In each neuron (n = 6), baclofen increased mIPSC interevent interval (P < 0.0005, K-S test) without reducing their amplitude (P > 0.03, K-S test). Therefore considering all tested neurons, a significant increase of mIPSC interevent interval was observed (P < 0.05, paired Student’s t-test, n = 6) with no change in their amplitude (P > 0.5, paired Student’s t-test, n = 6; Table 1).

Effect of AP4 and baclofen on mIPSCs in cadmium

The difference in AP4 and baclofen action was further confirmed in experiments performed in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and CdCl2 (100 µM), to abolish the contribution of VDCCs to the spontaneous release of GABA. In these conditions, in no neuron AP4 (100 µM) caused changes in mIPSC interevent interval cumulative distribution (P > 0.1, K-S test, n = 5) or in their amplitude distribution (P > 0.1, K-S test, n = 5; Fig. 3, A and B). Thus no significant change resulted from group comparison of both mIPSC amplitude (P > 0.4, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5) and interevent interval (P > 0.5, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5; Fig. 3B, Table 1).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Group III mGluRs inhibit the voltage-dependent calcium channel (VDCC)-dependent GABAergic transmission. Successive sample traces of miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs) before (top), during (middle), and after (bottom) perfusion of 100 µM AP4 (A and E) or 10 µM baclofen (C and G). Amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) distributions of the mIPSCs recorded from the corresponding cells are shown in B, F, D, and H, below the traces. In the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and cadmium (100 µM), baclofen (D) significantly increased mIPSCs interevent intervals (P < 0.0001, K-S test) without changing their amplitude distribution (P > 0.29, K-S test), whereas AP4 (B) was ineffective (P > 0.53 for amplitude and P > 0.23 for interevent interval distribution, K-S test). Insets: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of mIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from 5 neurons in both B and D (**P < 0.02, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test). F: in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and barium (1 mM), AP4 increased mIPSCs interevent intervals (P < 0.0001, K-S test), without changing their amplitude (P > 0.08, K-S test) and baclofen (H) increased significantly mIPSCs interevent intervals (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and decreased their amplitude distribution (P < 0.001, K-S test). Insets: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of mIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from 11 neurons in both F and H (***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test).

 
Conversely, baclofen (10 µM), in the presence of TTX (1 µM) and CdCl2 (100 µM), still produced in each neuron (n = 5) a significant rightward shift of the interevent cumulative distribution (P < 0.005, K-S test) with no associated reduction of mIPSC amplitude (P > 0.05, K-S test; Fig. 3, C and D). Thus considering all tested neurons, a significant increase of mIPSC interevent interval was observed (P < 0.02, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5) with no change in their amplitude (P > 0.3, paired Student’s t-test, n = 5; Fig. 3D, Table 1).

Effect of AP4 and baclofen on mIPSCs in barium

The lack of effect of AP4 on mIPSCs suggests that group III mGluRs decrease GABAergic transmission by acting on the VDCCs opened after action potential invasion of the presynaptic terminal. Alternatively though, group III mGluRs may act on TTX-sensitive Na+ conductances, hence reducing action-dependent synaptic events only. To discriminate between these two possibilities, we repeated the same experiments in the presence of TTX and BaCl2. We envisaged that, by blocking K+ conductances with Ba2+, presynaptic calcium channels may still contribute to the spontaneous release of GABA as a result of presynaptic terminal depolarization, although in the absence of action potentials. Indeed, in control experiments we found that mIPSC interevent interval, recorded in TTX (1 µM), decreased from 99.7 ± 12.6 to 65.7 ± 7.4 ms (P < 0.02, paired Student’s t-test, n = 9) after perfusion with BaCl2 (1 mM). A subsequent addition of CdCl2 (100 µM), in the continuous presence of TTX and BaCl2 increased mIPSC interevent interval to 138.9 ± 19.6 ms (P < 0.005, paired Student’s t-test, n = 9; data not shown).

In each neuron (n = 11) recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and BaCl2 (1 mM), AP4 (100 µM) caused a significant rightward shift of the interevent cumulative distribution (P < 0.005, K-S test; Fig. 3, E and F), associated, in 2 of 11 neurons, to reduction of mIPSC amplitude (P < 0.02, K-S test). Overall, both the reduction of mIPSC amplitude and the increase in their interevent interval was statistically significant (P < 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively, paired Student’s t-test, n = 11; Fig. 3F, Table 1).

Baclofen (10 µM), in the presence of TTX and BaCl2, was still effective in reducing GABAergic transmission. In each neuron (n = 11) baclofen increased mIPSC interevent interval (P < 0.0001, K-S test; Fig. 3, G and H), associated, in 8 of 11 cells, to reduction of their amplitude (P < 0.02, K-S test). Accordingly, from group analysis of all tested neurons, both the reduction of mIPSC amplitude and their increase in interevent interval resulted statistically significant (P < 0.001 both, paired Student’s t-test, n = 11; Fig. 3H, Table 1).

Effect of AP4 and baclofen on ionomycin-induced mIPSCs

The previous experiments indicate that group III mGluRs inhibit the release of GABA by acting on VDCCs, while the mechanism of action of GABAB receptors is downstream Ca2+ influx through VDCCs. We further explored whether baclofen could also inhibit VDCC-independent, but Ca2+-dependent, miniature events. To this aim, we bypassed Ca2+ entry through VDCCs with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin.

As expected, perfusion of ionomycin (2 µM), in the presence of TTX (1 µM), resulted in a significant decrease of mIPSC interevent interval, from 92.0 ± 8.6 to 48.7 ± 3.3 ms (P < 0.001, paired Student t-test, n = 14), associated to increase of mIPSC amplitude, from 29.6 ± 2.2 to 42.4 ± 3.7 pA (P < 0.005, paired Student t-test, n = 14), that reached a plateau within 10–15 min of drug perfusion (Fig. 4, AC). Therefore in each one of the recorded cells a rightward shift of the interevent cumulative distribution was observed (P < 0.0001, K-S test), associated to increase of mIPSC amplitude (P < 0.0001, K-S test; Fig. 4C).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. GABAB receptors inhibit ionomycin-induced mIPSCs. A: successive sample traces of mIPSCs recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM, left) and TTX + ionomycin (2 µM, right). B: running average histogram (mean ± SE; bin size: 30 s) of mIPSCs amplitude (top) and interevent interval (bottom) from the cell in A, showing the time course of ionomycin effect. C: amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) cumulative distributions of the mIPSCs recorded from the same cell shown in A, in TTX (control) and TTX +ionomycin (ionomycin). In this cell, ionomycin reduced mIPSCs interevent interval distribution (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and increased their amplitude (P < 0.0001, K-S test). Insets: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of mIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from a total of 14 neurons (***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test). D: successive sample traces of mIPSCs recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and ionomycin (2 µM) before (top), during (middle), and after (bottom) perfusion of 100 µM AP4. E: in the cell shown in D, no significant changes were observed after perfusion of AP4 in the interevent interval (P > 0.78, K-S test) or in the amplitude distribution (P > 0.18, K-S test). F: successive sample traces of mIPSCs recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and ionomycin (2 µM) before (top), during (middle), and after (bottom) perfusion of 10 µM baclofen. G: baclofen increased mIPSCs interevent interval distribution (P < 0.0001, K-S test), and reduced their amplitude (P < 0.0005, K-S test) in the cell shown in F. Insets in E and G: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of mIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from 15 (E) and 12 (G) neurons (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test).

 
After perfusion in TTX (1 µM) and ionomycin (2 µM) for ≥15 min, baclofen (10 µM) was added to the medium and a significant reduction of GABAergic transmission was observed. In each neuron (n = 12) baclofen increased mIPSC interevent interval (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and reduced their amplitude in 11 of 12 cells (P < 0.005, K-S test; Fig. 4, F and G). Overall, both the reduction of mIPSC amplitude and the increase in their interevent interval were statistically significant (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05, respectively, paired Student’s t-test, n = 12; Fig. 4G, Table 1). Conversely, mIPSCs in TTX (1 µM) and ionomycin (2 µM) were insensitive to AP4 (100 µM). In all tested cells (n = 15), AP4 (100 µM) did not produce significant changes in the cumulative distribution of mIPSC interevent interval (P > 0.1, K-S test) or amplitude (P > 0.1, K-S test; Fig. 4, D and E). Accordingly, no significant change resulted from group comparison of both mIPSC amplitude (P > 0.4, paired Student’s t-test, n = 15) and interevent interval (P > 0.2, paired Student’s t-test, n = 15; Fig. 4E, Table 1).

Effect of AP4 and baclofen on {alpha}-LTX-induced mIPSCs

We further explored the mechanism of GABAB-mediated presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic transmission by testing if baclofen could directly inhibit the GABA release machinery. To this aim, we used the active component of the black widow spider peptide {alpha}-latrotoxin ({alpha}-LTX). This peptide has been shown to promote Ca2+-independent vesicular release of neurotransmitters (Capogna et al. 1996aGo).

Bath perfusion of {alpha}-LTX (0.3 nM), in the presence of TTX (1 µM), resulted in a significant decrease of mIPSC interevent interval, from 76.1 ± 7.3 to 42.4 ± 2.7 ms (P < 0.005, paired Student t-test, n = 7), associated to increase of amplitude, from 29.4 ± 3.4 to 44.4 ± 3.9 pA (P < 0.001, paired Student t-test, n = 7), that reached a plateau within 10–15 min of drug perfusion (Fig. 5, AC). Thus in each one of the recorded cells, a rightward shift of the interevent cumulative distribution was observed (P < 0.0001, K-S test), associated to increase of mIPSC amplitude (P < 0.0001, K-S test; Fig. 5C).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. GABAB receptors inhibit mIPSCs induced by {alpha}-LTX. A: successive sample traces of mIPSCs recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM, left) and TTX + {alpha}-LTX (0.3 nM, right). B: running average histogram (mean ± SE; bin size: 30 s) of mIPSCs amplitude (top) and interevent interval (bottom) from the cell in A, showing the time course of {alpha}-LTX effect. C: amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) distributions of the mIPSCs recorded from the same cells are shown in A in TTX (control) and TTX + {alpha}-LTX ({alpha}-LTX). In this cell, {alpha}-LTX reduced mIPSCs interevent interval distribution (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and increased their amplitude (P < 0.0001, K-S test). Insets: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of mIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from a total of 7 neurons (***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test). D: successive sample traces of mIPSCs recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and {alpha}-LTX (0.3 nM) before (top), during (middle), and after (bottom) perfusion of 100 µM AP4. E: in the cell shown in D, no significant changes were observed after perfusion of AP4 in the interevent interval (P > 0.33, K-S test) or in the amplitude distribution (P > 0.31, K-S test). F: successive sample traces of mIPSCs recorded in the continuous presence of TTX (1 µM) and {alpha}-LTX (0.3 nM) before (top), during (middle), and after (bottom) perfusion of 10 µM baclofen. G: in the cell shown in F, baclofen increased mIPSCs interevent interval distribution (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and reduced their amplitude (P < 0.0001, K-S test). Insets in E and G: group analysis histograms (means ± SE) of mIPSCs amplitude (left) and interevent interval (right) from 10 (E) and 9 (G) neurons (**P < 0.02, ****P < 0.001, 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test).

 
After perfusion in TTX (1 µM) and {alpha}-LTX (0.3 nM) for ≥15 min, baclofen (10 µM) was added to the medium, and a significant reduction of GABAergic transmission was observed. In each neuron (n = 9), baclofen reversibly induced an increase of mIPSC interevent interval (P < 0.0001, K-S test) and reduced their amplitude in five of nine cells (P < 0.001, K-S test; Fig. 5, F and G). Overall, both the reduction of mIPSC amplitude and the increase in their interevent interval were statistically significant (P < 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively, paired Student’s t-test, n = 9; Fig. 5G, Table 1). Conversely, mIPSCs in TTX (1 µM) and {alpha}-LTX (0.3 nM) were insensitive to AP4 (100 µM). In all tested cells (n = 10), AP4 (100 µM) did not produce significant changes in the cumulative distribution of mIPSC interevent interval (P > 0.1, K-S test) or amplitude (P > 0.1, K-S test; Fig. 5, D and E). Accordingly, no significant change resulted from group comparison of both mIPSC amplitude (P > 0.8, paired Student’s t-test, n = 10) and interevent interval (P > 0.7, paired Student’s t-test, n = 10; Fig. 5E, Table 1).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present results give evidence of two different mechanisms of presynaptic inhibition on GABAergic synapses of the SNc. One mechanism, activated in response to group III mGluRs stimulation, consists of inhibition of presynaptic VDCCs. The second is initiated by GABAB receptors stimulation and causes a direct impairment of the vesicle release machinery.

Our experimental protocol required intracellular dialysis with Cs+ and QX-314 to abolish any postsynaptic change in K+ conductance, but, in so doing, any reliable electrophysiological identification of the recorded neurons was precluded (Mercuri et al. 1992Go; Perkins and Wong 1995Go). In spite of this experimental limitation, we can reasonably affirm that the data presented were obtained from DA neurons because their shape and location was typical of the DA SNc neurons (Grace and Onn 1989Go); their tonic 1- to 3-Hz firing activity, detected in cell attached mode, has previously been reported to be a hallmark of DA-sensitive neurons in this area (Berretta et al. 2000Go); and finally, neurons of the SNc with such a low-frequency tonic firing activity, detected in cell attached mode, have been immunohistochemically identified as tyrosine hydroxylase-positive in a previous report (Guatteo et al. 2000Go).

The inhibitory action of AP4 or baclofen could also be associated to inhibition of spontaneous events amplitude. This occurred with baclofen in barium, ionomycin, or {alpha}-LTX or with AP4 when mIPSCs were recorded in barium (Table 1). We can rule out that these effects are due to some form of postsynaptic action of baclofen or AP4 because neither of the two agonists affected mIPSC amplitude in TTX and cadmium (Fig. 3, AD; Table 1). More likely, the release of GABA occurs from multiple release sites at the same synapses; therefore in conditions of higher release probability, multiple events may overlap and generate larger events. Indeed, mIPSC mean amplitude in TTX alone or in TTX + Cd2+ was smaller than that of sIPSCs (see Table 1), thus indicating that higher-amplitude events were due to action potential-dependent synaptic events. According to this hypothesis, the reduced occurrence of these higher amplitude events was proportional to the degree of reduction in probability of release by group III mGluRs or GABAB receptors.

Group III mGluRs-mediated presynaptic inhibition was absent when VDCCs were blocked by external cadmium, although supramaximal concentrations of AP4 had been used (Bonci et al. 1997Go). Moreover, when barium was added to the external medium, to boost the contribution of VDCCs, the inhibitory effect of AP4 on mIPSC frequency was even stronger than that observed on sIPSCs (P < 0.02, 2-tailed unpaired Student t-test; Fig. 6). Furthermore, the Ca2+-dependent, but VDCC-independent, release of GABA induced by ionomycin (Capogna et al. 1996aGo,bGo) was insensitive to AP4. These results indicate that group III mGluRs inhibit the Ca2+-dependent release of GABA that follows action potential invasion of the terminal exclusively by reducing the conductance of presynaptic VDCCs. It should also be noted that the effects on sIPSCs in basal conditions were relatively small; indeed, for sIPSC amplitude, they did not even reach the level for statistical significance (Table 1). This probably occurs because in our in vitro conditions most of the sIPSCs were in actual facts miniature events, as indicated by the high proportion of sIPSCs that were insensitive to TTX or TTX + Cd2+ (Table 1). Notably, the degree of inhibition of sIPSCs by AP4 was smaller than that observed for evoked IPSCs (~20 vs. ~50%; see Figs. 1 and 6). The reason for this discrepancy may reside in the VDCC dependence of evoked synaptic responses as opposed to sIPSCs, which are only partially sensitive to the block of these channels.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Summary histogram. Normalized changes (means ± SE) of s- or mIPSC frequency in different experimental conditions in response to 100 µM AP4 or 10 µM baclofen. AP4 reduced the frequency of s- and of mIPSCs in TTX and barium. Moreover, the degree of frequency inhibition in TTX and barium was significantly higher than that of sIPSCs. In all other experimental conditions, no significant changes were detected in mIPSCs frequency by AP4. In contrast, baclofen significantly reduced s- or mIPSC frequency in all experimental conditions. The number of cells in each experimental protocol is indicated above the corresponding columns. ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, 2-tailed 1-population Student t-test; {star}, P < 0.02, 2-tailed unpaired Student t-test).

 
An alternative explanation for the lack of mIPSC sensitivity to AP4 could be a possible heterogeneity of presynaptic terminals, such that group III mGluRs may only be expressed in a limited number of afferent fibers, characterized by a low release probability. Thus the higher release probability associated to action-potential-dependent events would make them more sensitive to presynaptic inhibition than TTX-sensitive events, independently on the mechanism involved. According to this hypothesis, we should expect a more pronounced effect of AP4 on mIPSCs in conditions of increased basal release probability. Indeed, this is in line with the results obtained from experiments performed in barium in which AP4-mediated inhibition of mIPSCs was stronger than that observed for sIPSCs (Fig. 6). However, the same did not occur in experiments performed with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin, which increases mIPSC frequency in a Ca2+-dependent manner but without affecting VDCC conductance. As shown in Fig. 4, mIPSCs recorded in the presence of ionomycin were completely insensitive to AP4 in spite of the relatively low mIPSC interevent interval in ionomycin (see Table 1). On this basis, the lack of effect of AP4 on mIPSCs should not be linked to the mIPSC rate in AP4-sensitive terminals but to its intrinsic mechanism of action.

Most of the eight cloned mGluR subtypes (Conn and Pin 1997Go) are distributed throughout all areas of the basal ganglia and regulate cell excitability and synaptic transmission at excitatory and inhibitory synapses (Rouse et al. 2000Go). In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry studies has demonstrated the presence of group III mGluRs in the SNc of the mGluR7 subtype, located onto striatonigral presynaptic terminals (Kosinski et al. 1999Go). Indeed the high concentration of the selective group III agonist AP4 used in our investigation to obtain a maximal response is indicative of this mGluR subtype (Conn and Pin 1997Go). In the striatopallidal projection, AP4 does also presynaptically depress GABAergic transmission acting on higher affinity mGluR4 of the same group III mGluR family (Valenti et al. 2003Go). Interestingly though, mIPSCs are depressed by AP4 in this area, suggesting that different subtypes of the same receptor family use separate mechanism of action to depress neurotransmission.

Differently from group III mGluRs, we have shown that stimulation of GABAB receptors resulted in presynaptic inhibition of GABA release in all experimental conditions implemented. In particular, the Ca2+-independent release of neurotransmitter induced by {alpha}-LTX (Capogna et al. 1996aGo,bGo) was significantly inhibited by baclofen, and the reduction of mIPSC frequency due to this toxin was not significantly different from that observed in the presence of cadmium (Fig. 6). In addition, we have shown that baclofen reduced the spontaneous release of GABA induced by the ionophore ionomycin, by a similar extent to that observed in the presence of cadmium (Fig. 6). Because ionomycin promotes a VDCC-independent, though Ca2+-dependent, transmitter release (Capogna et al. 1996aGo,bGo), we can conceivably hypothesize that a direct interference with the exocytotic process may also account for presynaptic inhibition of evoked, Ca2+-dependent, GABA release by GABAB receptors in these synapses.

Our results confirm and further extend a previous report on inhibition of cadmium-resistant mIPSCs by baclofen, in embryonic midbrain cultures (Jarolimek and Misgeld 1992Go; Rohrbacher et al. 1997Go), moreover, a similar effect of inhibition of ionomycin-induced mIPSCs has been observed in embryonic cultures of the ventral tegmental area, after stimulation of mu-opioid receptors (Bergevin et al. 2002Go). Presynaptic inhibition by GABAB receptors acting on the release machinery has already been described in several other areas of the CNS (Capogna et al. 1996bGo; Kolaj et al. 2004Go; Scanziani et al. 1992Go), although mechanisms of reduction of VDCC conductance has similarly been proposed (Chen and van den Pol 1998Go; Isaacson 1998Go; Takahashi et al. 1998Go; Wu and Saggau 1995Go), alone or in combination with impairment of the exocytotic process (Dittman and Regehr 1996Go).

Functional considerations

If we take into account the whole circuitry rather than single evoked synaptic responses, we may predict different outcomes resulting from a presynaptic inhibition targeting VDCCs or the exocytotic machinery. First of all, VDCCs are subject to a voltage-dependent relief from G protein mediated inhibition (Brody and Yue 2000Go), therefore the efficacy of presynaptic inhibition targeting VDCCs is highly sensitive to the level of presynaptic terminal polarization as well as to specific patterns of presynaptic firing (Brody et al. 1997Go; Reid et al. 2003Go). In contrast, presynaptic inhibition targeting the exocytotic machinery is largely independent from the level of presynaptic activity. Moreover, it causes a parallel inhibition of signals actively generated by coded afferent inputs and of spontaneous signals randomly generated by the passive fusion of vesicle into the presynaptic membrane, hence differently affecting the signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, presynaptic inhibition of spontaneous neurotransmitter release, particularly at GABAergic synapses, can reduce the tonic activation of postsynaptic receptors, thus affecting network excitability (Semyanov et al. 2004Go). Therefore presynaptic GABAB receptors and group III mGluRs may differently modulate GABAergic inputs to DA neurons of the SNc. Although GABAB receptors should exert a simple feed-back auto-inhibition of any form of GABAergic response, stimulation of group III mGluRs by extrinsic glutamate afferent should selectively depress actively generated signals. In addition, specific codes of GABAergic signaling may display different sensitivities to this glutamate-mediated hetero-inhibition.

The firing activity of midbrain DA neurons, and consequently the release of DA to target areas, is highly sensitive to tonic inhibition by GABAergic afferents (Celada et al. 1999Go; Paldini and Tepper 1999Go; Paladini et al. 1999Go). Therefore the characterization of group-III-mediated presynaptic inhibition reported here, in relation to that of GABAB receptors, provides new insights into the role of these receptors in the processing of information in the SNc and their potential use as targets for the pharmacological treatment of Parkinson’s disease (Rouse et al. 2000Go; Valenti et al. 2003Go).


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by Ministero della Salute Grant RF03.182B to N. Berretta and Fondo per gli Investimenti della Ricerca di Base Grants RBNE01WY7P_010 and RBNE017555_006 to N. B. Mercuri.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Berretta, C.E.R.C. Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Experimental Neurology, Via del Fosso di Fiorano, 64, 00143 Rome, Italy (E-mail: n.berretta{at}santalucia.it)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bergevin A, Girardot D, Bourque MJ, and Trudeau LE. Presynaptic mu-opioid receptors regulate a late step of the secretory process in rat ventral tegmental area GABAergic neurons. Neuropharmacology 42: 1065–1078, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Berretta N, Bernardi G, and Mercuri NB. Alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-mediated excitation of substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons. Neuroscience 98: 599–604, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Bonci A, Grillner P, Siniscalchi A, Mercuri NB, and Bernardi G. Glutamate metabotropic receptor agonists depress excitatory and inhibitory transmission on rat mesencephalic principal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 9: 2359–2369, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Brody DL, Patil PG, Mulle JG, Snutch TP, and Yue DT. Bursts of action potential waveforms relieve G-protein inhibition of recombinant P/Q-type Ca2+ channels in HEK 293 cells. J Physiol 499: 637–644, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Brody DL and Yue DT. Relief of G-protein inhibition of calcium channels and short-term synaptic facilitation in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 20: 889–898, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Capogna M. Distinct properties of presynaptic group II and III metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated inhibition of perforant pathway-CA1 EPSCs. Eur J Neurosci 19: 2847–2858, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Capogna M, Gahwiler BH, and Thompson SM. Calcium-independent actions of alpha-latrotoxin on spontaneous and evoked synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 76: 3149–3158, 1996a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Capogna M, Gahwiler BH, and Thompson SM. Presynaptic inhibition of calcium-dependent and -independent release elicited with ionomycin, gadolinium, and alpha-latrotoxin in the hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 75: 2017–2028, 1996b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Celada P, Paladini CA, and Tepper JM. GABAergic control of rat substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons: role of globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata. Neuroscience 89: 813–825, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Chen G and van fen Pol AN. Presynaptic GABAB autoreceptor modulation of P/Q-type calcium channels and GABA release in rat suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons. J Neurosci 18: 1913–1922, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Collingridge GL and Davies J. The influence of striatal stimulation and putative neurotransmitters on identified neurones in the rat substantia nigra. Brain Res. 212: 345–359, 1981.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Conn PJ and Pin JP. Pharmacology and functions of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37: 205–237, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Dittman JS and Regehr WG. Contributions of calcium-dependent and calcium-independent mechanisms to presynaptic inhibition at a cerebellar synapse. J Neurosci 16: 1623–1633, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Doi A, Ishibashi H, Jinno S, Kosaka T, and Akaike N. Presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic miniature currents by metabotropic glutamate receptor in the rat CNS. Neuroscience 109: 299–311, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Engberg G, Kling-Petersen T, and Nissbrandt H. GABAB-receptor activation alters the firing pattern of dopamine neurons in the rat substantia nigra. Synapse 15: 229–238, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Grace AA and Onn SP. Morphology and electrophysiological properties of immunocytochemically identified rat dopamine neurons recorded in vitro. J Neurosci 9: 3463–3481, 1989.[Abstract]

Greenamyre JT. Glutamatergic influences on the basal ganglia. Clin Neuropharmacol 24: 65–70, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Groenewegen HJ. The basal ganglia and motor control. Neural Plast 10: 107–120, 2003.[Medline]

Grofova I, Deniau JM, and Kitai ST. Morphology of the substantia nigra pars reticulata projection neurons intracellularly labeled with HRP. J Comp Neurol 208: 352–368, 1982.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Guatteo E, Fusco FR, Giacomini P, Bernardi G, and Mercuri NB. The weaver mutation reverses the function of dopamine and GABA in mouse dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci 20: 6013–6020, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haber SN, Groenewegen HJ, Grove EA, and Nauta WJ. Efferent connections of the ventral pallidum: evidence of a dual striato pallidofugal pathway. J Comp Neurol 235: 322–35, 1985.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hammond C, Deniau JM, Rizk A, and Feger J. Electrophysiological demonstration of an excitatory subthalamonigral pathway in the rat. Brain Res 151: 235–244, 1978.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Hausser MA and Yung WH. Inhibitory synaptic potentials in guinea pig substantia nigra dopamine neurons in vitro. J Physiol 479: 401–422, 1994.[ISI]

Isaacson JS. GABAB receptor-mediated modulation of presynaptic currents and excitatory transmission at a fast central synapse. J Neurophysiol 80: 1571–1576, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jane DE, Pittaway K, Sunter DC, Thomas NK, and Watkins JC. New phenylglycine derivatives with potent and selective antagonist activity at presynaptic glutamate receptors in neonatal rat spinal cord. Neuropharmacology 34: 851–856, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Jarolimek W and Misgeld U. On the inhibitory actions of baclofen and gamma-aminobutyric acid in rat ventral midbrain culture. J Physiol 451: 419–443, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kolaj M, Bai D, and Renaud LP. GABAB receptor modulation of rapid inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission from subfornical organ and other afferents to median preoptic nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol 92: 111–122, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kosinski CM, Risso Bradley S, Conn PJ, Levey AI, Landwehrmeyer GB, Penney Jb JR, Young AB, and Standaert DG. Localization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 mRNA and mGluR7a protein in the rat basal ganglia. J Comp Neurol 415: 266–284, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mercuri NB, Calabresi P, and Bernardi G. The electrophysiological actions of dopamine and dopaminergic drugs on neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area. Life Sci 51: 711–718, 1992.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Montague PR, Dayan P, and Sejnowski TJ. A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning. J Neurosci 16: 1936–1947, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paladini CA, Celada P, and Tepper JM. Striatal, pallidal, and pars reticulata evoked inhibition of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons is mediated by GABA(A) receptors in vivo. Neuroscience 89: 799–812, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Paladini CA and Tepper JM. GABA(A) and GABA(B) antagonists differentially affect the firing pattern of substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons in vivo. Synapse 32: 165–176, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Perkins KL and Wong RK. Intracellular QX-314 blocks the hyperpolarization-activated inward current Iq in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol 73: 911–915, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pillon B, Czernecki V, and Dubois B. Dopamine and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurol 16: S17–22, 2003.

Reid CA, Bekkers JM, and Clements JD. Presynaptic Ca2+ channels: a functional patchwork. Trends Neurosci 26: 683–687, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rohrbacher J, Jarolimek W, Lewen A, and Misgeld U. GABAB receptor-mediated inhibition of spontaneous inhibitory synaptic currents in rat midbrain culture. J Physiol 500: 739–749, 1997.[ISI]

Rouse ST, Marino MJ, Bradley SR, Awad H, Wittmann M, and Conn PJ. Distribution and roles of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the basal ganglia motor circuit: implications for treatment of Parkinson’s disease and related disorders. Pharmacol Ther 88: 427–435, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Sakaba T and Neher E. Direct modulation of synaptic vesicle priming by GABA(B) receptor activation at a glutamatergic synapse. Nature 424: 775–778, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]

Scanziani M, Capogna M, Gahwiler BH, and Thompson SM. Presynaptic inhibition of miniature excitatory synaptic currents by baclofen and adenosine in the hippocampus. Neuron 9: 919–927, 1992.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Scanziani M, Gahwiler BH, and Thompson SM. Presynaptic inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission by muscarinic and metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in the hippocampus: are Ca2+ channels involved?. Neuropharmacology 34: 1549–1557, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Scarnati E, Proia A, Campana E, and Pacitti C. A microiontophoretic study on the nature of the putative synaptic neurotransmitter involved in the pedunculopontine-substantia nigra pars compacta excitatory pathway of the rat. Exp Brain Res 62: 470–478, 1986.[ISI][Medline]

Schoepp DD, Jane DE, and Monn JA. Pharmacological agents acting at subtypes of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuropharmacology 38: 1431–1476, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Semyanov A, Walker MC, Kullmann DM, and Silver RA. Tonically active GABA(A) receptors: modulating gain and maintaining the tone. Trends Neurosci 27: 262–269, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Sesack SR, Deutch AY, Roth RH, and Bunney BS. Topographical organization of the efferent projections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: an anterograde tract-tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. J Comp Neurol 290: 213–242, 1989.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Smith AD and Bolam JP. The neural network of the basal ganglia as revealed by the study of synaptic connections of identified neurones. Trends Neurosci 13: 259–265, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Stefani A, Pisani A, Mercuri NB, and Calabresi P. The modulation of calcium currents by the activation of mGluRs. Functional implications. Mol Neurobiol 13: 81–95, 1996.[ISI][Medline]

Stefani A, Pisani A, Mercuri NB, Bernardi G, and Calabresi P. Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibits calcium currents and GABA-mediated synaptic potentials in striatal neurons. J Neurosci 14: 6734–6743, 1994.[Abstract]

Stefani A, Spadoni F, Giacomini P, Lavaroni F, and Bernardi G. The modulation of calcium current by GABA metabotropic receptors in a sub-population of pallidal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 11: 3995–4005, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Takahashi T, Forsythe ID, Tsujimoto T, Barnes-Davies M, and Onodra K. Presynaptic calcium current modulation by a metabotropic glutamate receptor. Science 274: 594–597, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takahashi T, Kajikawa Y, and Tsujimoto T. G-Protein-coupled modulation of presynaptic calcium currents and transmitter release by a GABAB receptor. J Neurosci 18: 3138–3146, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tepper JM, Martin LP, and Anderson DR. GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition of rat substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons by pars reticulata projection neurons. J Neurosci 15: 3092–3103, 1995.[Abstract]

Valenti O, Marino MJ, Wittmann M, Lis E, Dilella AG, Kinney GG, and Conn PJ. Group III metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated modulation of the striatopallidal synapse. J Neurosci 23: 7218–7226, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walaas I and Fonnum F. Biochemical evidence for gamma-aminobutyrate containing fibres from the nucleus accumbens to the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in the rat. Neuroscience 5: 63–72, 1980.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Wu LG and Saggau P. GABAB receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition in guinea-pig hippocampus is caused by reduction of presynaptic Ca2+ influx. J Physiol 485: 649–657, 1995.[ISI]

Wu LG and Saggau P. Presynaptic inhibition of elicited neurotransmitter release. Trends Neurosci 20: 204–212, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Zhang C and Schmidt JT. Adenosine A1 and class II metabotropic glutamate receptors mediate shared presynaptic inhibition of retinotectal transmission. J Neurophysiol 82: 2947–55, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page