HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/6/3788    most recent 00230.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, G. Articles by Traub, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, G. Articles by Traub, R. J.

Differential Processing of Noxious Colonic Input by Thoracolumbar and Lumbosacral Dorsal Horn Neurons in the Rat

¹Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental School and ²Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 2 March 2005; accepted in final form 5 August 2005

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Previous studies suggest the lumbosacral (LS) spinal cord processes acute colorectal stimuli whereas the thoracolumbar (TL) and LS spinal segments process inflammatory stimuli. In this study, the effects of colorectal distention (CRD) on TL and LS dorsal horn neuronal activity were recorded in Nembutal-anesthetized male rats both with and without colonic inflammation. Both single cells (before and after inflammation) and populations (multiple cells from noninflamed or inflamed rats) were studied. CRD-responsive neurons had excitatory Abrupt (ON–OFF with stimulus) or Sustained (prolonged after discharge) responses or were Inhibited by CRD. In noninflamed rats, a significantly greater percentage of LS neurons (63% Abrupt, 27% Sustained) were excited by CRD than TL neurons (61% Abrupt, 3% Sustained). The remaining cells were Inhibited (10% LS, 36% TL). LS Abrupt neurons had lower thresholds and greater response magnitudes to CRD compared with TL Abrupt neurons. After colonic inflammation, TL neurons became more excitable: the percentage of Inhibited neurons decreased, the response magnitude of Abrupt neurons increased, and the threshold decreased. In contrast, in single-cell recordings, the response of LS Sustained neurons increased, whereas LS Abrupt neurons decreased. These data suggest that in noninflamed rats, the net response to CRD of TL visceroceptive spinal sensory neurons is less than that of LS neurons. Colonic inflammation increases the net response of TL neurons and differentially modulates the response of LS neurons. These differences may contribute to the functional dichotomy between the TL and LS spinal segments in processing acute and inflammatory colorectal pain.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
A unique feature of the viscera is dual innervation by sensory afferent fibers projecting in the same nerves as sympathetic (splanchnic, hypogastric) and parasympathetic (vagal, pelvic) efferents. In the rat, the descending colon and rectum are innervated by primary afferent fibers projecting in the pelvic nerve to the L6–S2 spinal cord segments and hypogastric/lumbar colonic nerves projecting to the T13–L2 spinal cord (Mayer and Gebhart 1994; Mayer and Raybould 1990; Nadelhaft and Booth 1984; Ness and Gebhart 1988; Traub et al. 1999). However, the physiological role of this dual innervation in visceral nociceptive processing is unclear. Previous studies suggest that the lumbosacral (LS) and thoracolumbar (TL) spinal cord segments process acute and inflammatory pain from the colon and rectum differently. In humans, referred pain evoked by colorectal distention (CRD) in normal volunteers is perceived in the sacral dermatomes, whereas patients with irritable bowel syndrome or Crohn’s disease report referred pain expanding into the TL dermatomes (Bernstein et al. 1996). In rats, lesioning the hypogastric/lumbar colonic nerves did not affect avoidance behavior to noxious CRD (Ness et al. 1991). Conversely, L5–S3 dorsal rhizotomy eliminated the visceromotor response (vmr), which partially recovered after colonic inflammation (Traub 2000). These data suggest that acute colorectal pain is processed in the lumbosacral spinal cord, recruiting the thoracolumbar spinal segments during pathophysiological conditions. Supporting data are provided by studies showing repetitive CRD induced Fos expression in LS spinal cord and minimal Fos in the TL spinal cord. After colonic inflammation, there was a significant upregulation of Fos expression in both regions of spinal cord (Traub and Murphy 2002).

The response of TL and LS dorsal horn neurons to CRD have previously been reported (Ness and Gebhart 1987, 1988, 1989). However, those studies were conducted in spinalized rats or in rats in which the cervical spinal cord was exposed. According to observations by Qin et al. (1999) stimulation of the C1 spinal segment suppresses activity of visceral nociceptive neurons in the lumbosacral spinal cord and noxious pinch in the head and neck region attenuates the response of LS neurons to CRD (Ness and Gebhart 1991). Therefore it is necessary to clarify how visceroceptive dorsal horn neurons process noxious or inflammatory stimuli from the colon under conditions where distal dermatomes remain intact. To address the hypothesis that the LS and TL spinal cord segments differentially process acute and inflammatory colorectal pain, we examined the response properties of TL and LS dorsal horn neurons to CRD in the absence and presence of colorectal inflammation. Some of these data were presented in abstract form (Wang and Traub 2003).

	METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Animals and preparation

Experiments were performed in 80 adult male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 270–380 g. All experimental procedures were approved by the University of Maryland Dental School Animal Care and Use committee and conform to the guidelines for use of experimental animals published by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Rats with or without colonic inflammation were prepared for recording from the thoracolumbar (T13–L2; TL) or lumbosacral (L6–S2; LS) spinal cord segments. Rats were deprived of food, but not water, for 18–24 h before the experiment. On the day of recording, rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal, 50 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally). The left carotid artery and left jugular vein were cannulated for monitoring arterial pressure and infusing anesthetic, respectively. Anesthesia was maintained by intravenous infusion of Nembutal (5–10 mg · kg^–1 · h^–1). A catheter was inserted into the trachea for artificial ventilation. The wound margins were wiped with a local anesthetic ointment and sutured. The respiration rate was adjusted to maintain end tidal CO₂ of 3.5–4.5% and a mean blood pressure of 100–130 mmHg. A thermostatically controlled water pad and overhead lamp were used to maintain body temperature. Experiments were terminated when either the mean blood pressure fell below 80 mmHg and/or the diameter of the pupil enlarged more than 2 mm for a period of time.

After being placed in a head holder, the rat was paralyzed with pancuronium bromide (0.2 mg · kg^–1 · h^–1) and suspended with thoracic vertebral and iliac clamps. Laminectomies were performed in 48 rats to expose the L6–S2 spinal cord segments and in 28 rats to expose the T13–L2 segments. The dura matter of the exposed spinal segments was carefully removed. Skin flaps were used to form a pool that was filled with warm mineral oil.

Electrophysiology

Tungsten microelectrodes (1–2 M, Micro Probe, Potomac, MD) were used for extracellular recording of single units in the L6–S2 or T13–L2 spinal segments from 0.5 to 1.5 (TL) or 1.2 mm (LS) lateral to the midline, 0.2–1.5 mm from spinal cord dorsum. The signal was amplified and fed into a window discriminator to isolate a single unit. The output of the discriminator was displayed on an oscilloscope and recorded to computer using a CED micro1401 with Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronics Design, Cambridge, UK) for on-line and off-line analysis. Units that responded to 80 mmHg CRD, whether excited or inhibited, were further studied.

Colonic stimulation and inflammation

CRD was produced by inflating a balloon (made from the finger of a latex glove, 6–6.5 cm, attached to tygon tubing), which was inserted through the anus into the descending colon and rectum, to the desired pressure. The pressure was monitored and kept constant by a pressure-timing device (Bioengineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA). The search stimulus consisted of noxious (80 mmHg) CRD for 10 s, at a minimum of 1-min intervals and cutaneous stimulation (touch and light pinch) in the area of the presumptive receptive field. On finding a neuron responsive to 80 mmHg CRD, rats were distended with a series of graded-intensity stimuli. Each trial consisted of 20, 40, 60, and 80 mmHg distention, 20-s duration, at 3-min intervals. The cutaneous receptive field was mapped (see following text).

Twenty-nine rats were studied in the absence of colonic inflammation (noninflamed). In an additional 23 rats, the colon was inflamed by injection of mustard oil (2%, 0.25 ml) when the surgery was finished. Recordings were made between 30 min and 4 h after mustard oil injection. Multiple cells were studied in these rats (population study). In another 24 rats, the effects of colonic inflammation were observed in a single neuron (single-cell study). After recording two to three baseline trials, mustard oil (2%, 0.25 ml) was injected through a PE50 tube with holes on the side that was placed in the colon before recording. The responses to CRD were recorded 30, 60, and 90 min after mustard oil injection. At the conclusion of the experiment, an electrolytic lesion was made to mark the recording site. A block of tissue containing the lesion was immersion fixed. Sections (45 microns) were cut and stained with cresyl violet. The lesion was identified and drawn onto a standard picture of the LS or TL spinal cord.

Data collection and analysis

Units were classified as Abrupt, Sustained, or Inhibited based on their response to 80 mmHg CRD (Ji and Traub 2002; Ness and Gebhart 1987). Abrupt neurons responded immediately at stimulus onset, rapidly reached the peak response, and rapidly (<5 s) returned to the baseline level at stimulus offset. Sustained neurons began responding at stimulus onset, reached a peak later during the stimulus (generally 10 s), and had a sustained afterdischarge at stimulus offset, decreasing to baseline between 5 and 140 s. Inhibited neurons were spontaneously active and were inhibited by CRD. Abrupt and Inhibited unit activity was quantified as the mean discharge frequency during the 20 s of the CRD stimulus minus spontaneous activity determined in the preceding 20 s. Sustained unit’s activity was measured as the mean discharge frequency during the 20-s distention plus the afterdischarge. The afterdischarge persisted until it dropped below the mean + 2 SDs of the background activity (20 s before distention) for 2 s. The data are expressed as means ± SE. Data were analyzed in SigmaStat using ², t-test, paired t-test, two-way ANOVA, or two-way repeated-measures (RM) ANOVA as appropriate. Post hoc comparisons (Student–Newman–Keuls) were performed if the ANOVA term was significant. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Somatic stimulation and the measurement of receptive field size

The size and location of the convergent cutaneous receptive field to noxious stimulation was determined with a blood vessel clamp. The boundary of the receptive field was determined by pinch and carefully mapped and drawn on a standard sketch of a rat and normalized as a percentage of the total area of the rat drawing. To do this the receptive fields were cut out of the sketches, weighed and normalized to the mean weight of 10 cutouts of the full sketch of the rat to determine the relative size (%) of the receptive field.

Evan’s Blue extraction

In 10 rats the extent of colonic inflammation was determined by quantifying the amount of Evan’s Blue extravasated into the colon. At the conclusion of the experiment, Evan’s Blue (50 mg/kg) was injected through the carotid cannula. After 15 min rats were overdosed with Nembutal and perfused with 200 ml normal saline. The colon was removed and placed in 5 ml dimethyl sulfoxide for 48 h. The concentration of extracted Evan’s Blue was detected by spectrophotometer at 620 mm absorbance and reported as micrograms Evan’s Blue per gram dry weight of colon. Nondistended rats were used to determine a baseline level of plasma extravasation.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Evan’s Blue extraction

As a gauge of the magnitude of colonic inflammation, the amount of Evan’s Blue dye extravasated into the colon at the end of the experiment in 10 rats (four from noninflamed animals and six from inflamed animals) was determined. After colonic distention, there was 152 ± 32 µg Evan’s Blue/g colon (dry wt). Colonic inflammation with mustard oil significantly increased the Evan’s Blue extravasation to 1,119 ± 375 µg/g colon (t-test, P < 0.05). In nondistended rats there was 60 ± 8 µg Evan’s Blue/g colon (n = 4).

Frequency distribution of TL and LS CRD responsive neurons and the effect of colonic inflammation

We recorded 133 neurons activated by CRD in the spinal dorsal horn: 68 in the TL spinal segments and 65 in the LS spinal segments. Thirty-six of the 68 TL neurons (13 rats) and 30 of the 65 LS neurons (16 rats) were recorded from rats in the absence of colonic inflammation (noninflamed rats). The remaining cells were recorded from rats with colonic inflammation (23 rats).

Neurons were classified into three groups on the basis of their response to 80 mmHg CRD: Abrupt, Sustained, and Inhibited (Fig. 1A). Neurons with similar response characteristics have been described previously (Al-Chaer et al. 1997; Ji and Traub 2002; Ji et al. 2003; Katter et al. 1996; Kolhekar and Gebhart 1996; Ness and Gebhart 1987; Olivar et al. 2000; Qin et al. 1999). In noninflamed animals these neurons were differentially distributed between the TL and LS spinal cord segments (², P < 0.005, Fig. 1B). Of note is the absence of Sustained neurons and the large number of Inhibited neurons in the TL spinal cord. The mean depth of recorded neurons ranged from 812 to 1,226 µm from the cord dorsum (Fig. 2F), but there was no difference between groups.

View larger version (45K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. A: three characteristic response profiles of neurons responding to colorectal distention (CRD) in the lumbosacral (LS) and thoracolumbar (TL) spinal cord segments: Abrupt, Sustained, and Inhibited. For each pair of traces, the 1st trace shows the peristimulus time histogram (1-s bins) and the 2nd trace shows the extracellular recording. Duration of the CRD is shown as the bottom trace and is the same for the 3 examples. B: frequency distribution of neurons based on response patterns to CRD from noninflamed and inflamed rats. Number of neurons in each group is shown above the column.

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Effects of colonic inflammation on TL and LS neurons derived from the population study. A: percentage of TL and LS Abrupt neurons in the absence (noninflamed) and presence of colonic inflammation that responded to increasing distention pressures (2, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, TL noninflamed vs. LS noninflamed; P < 0.01, P < 0.001, TL noninflamed vs. inflamed). B: magnitude of response to CRD of LS and TL Abrupt neurons from noninflamed and inflamed rats. Legend is the same as in A. Error bars are SE, shown in one direction for clarity. C: percentage inhibition from background spontaneous activity of Inhibited neurons. Legend is the same as in A. D: percentage of LS Sustained neurons responding to increasing distention pressures. E: magnitude of response of LS Sustained neurons from noninflamed and inflamed rats. F: recording sites based on the depth measurement from the cord dorsum in the LS (top) and TL (bottom) spinal segments. Mediolateral location of the neurons is not represented. Neurons with similar response profiles are graphed vertically. Open symbols on the left are from noninflamed rats; closed symbols are from inflamed rats., Abrupt; , Sustained; , Inhibited.

Response properties and the effects of colonic inflammation

The response threshold to CRD was lower in LS Abrupt neurons than that in TL Abrupt neurons as determined by the percentage of neurons that responded to 20 and 40 mmHg CRD (Fig. 2A). After colonic inflammation, the percentage of TL neurons that responded to 20 and 40 mmHg CRD increased (Fig. 2A), suggesting that inflammation decreased the threshold for response.

Examination of the response magnitude to graded intensities of CRD further illustrated differences between TL and LS neurons (Fig. 2B). In noninflamed rats, the magnitude of response of TL Abrupt neurons to graded intensities of CRD was significantly less than that of LS Abrupt neurons (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.001, Fig. 2B). There was no difference in the magnitude of inhibition (% change from background) of TL and LS Inhibited neurons (Fig. 2C). After colonic inflammation, the magnitude of response of TL Abrupt neurons significantly increased compared with neurons recorded in noninflamed rats (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.001; Fig. 2B). In contrast, colonic inflammation did not change the magnitude of response of LS Abrupt neurons (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.649). The magnitude of response to CRD of Inhibited neurons did not change in the TL or LS segments compared with noninflamed rats (Fig. 2C).

As shown in Fig. 1, there were too few Sustained neurons in the TL spinal cord to analyze, but there were sufficient neurons in the LS spinal cord. In the population study there was no effect of inflammation on the threshold or magnitude of response of LS Sustained neurons (Fig. 2, D and E), although there was an increase in the relative number of Sustained neurons in the LS spinal cord (Fig. 1B).

The effect of colonic inflammation on individual TL and LS dorsal horn neurons

Most published reports suggest that colonic inflammation increases the response of LS Abrupt dorsal horn neurons to CRD (Al-Chaer et al. 1997; Laird et al. 2001; Olivar et al. 2000). Although there is precedent that colonic inflammation does not increase the response of LS Abrupt neurons in spinalized rats (Ness and Gebhart 2000, 2001), the failure of inflammation to increase the response of LS Abrupt neurons in our experiments in intact rats warranted further investigation. Therefore the response of Abrupt and Sustained neurons was further examined by recording from cells in the TL and LS spinal segments of 24 rats before (baseline response) and 30, 60, and 90 min after colonic inflammation with mustard oil. In eight TL Abrupt neurons, the response to CRD increased in six neurons and did not change in two neurons. The mean response after colonic inflammation in the TL neurons significantly increased compared with the baseline response (two-way RM ANOVA, P < 0.05; Fig. 3, A and E). The increase was apparent by 30 min and maintained through 90 min (one-way RM ANOVA, P = 0.006; Fig. 3C). In contrast, the response of LS Abrupt neurons decreased in four neurons, increased in two neurons, and did not change in two neurons, resulting in a decrease in the mean response when compared with baseline (two-way RM ANOVA, P < 0.05; Fig. 3, B and E). Furthermore, the response of the LS neurons continually decreased compared with baseline over the recording period (one-way RM ANOVA, P = 0.025; Fig. 3C). In both the TL and LS segments, Abrupt neurons did not acquire an afterdischarge following colonic inflammation.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. Effect of colonic inflammation on the responses to CRD of individual TL and LS neurons. A: magnitude of response of 8 TL Abrupt neurons before (baseline) and after (inflamed) colonic inflammation. B: magnitude of response of 8 LS Abrupt neurons before (baseline) and after (inflamed) colonic inflammation. C: time course of the response to CRD after colonic inflammation for TL and LS Abrupt neurons. At each time point, data are the sum of the response (Hz) at the 4 distention pressures. D: magnitude of response of 8 LS Sustained neurons before (baseline) and after colonic inflammation. E: location of the recording sites reconstructed from electrolytic lesions recovered at the end of each experiment.

Spontaneous activity and effects of colonic inflammation

Eighteen of 22 (82%) TL and 16 of 19 (84%) LS Abrupt neurons had spontaneous activity in noninflamed rats. The mean rate of spontaneous activity of TL (8.8 ± 2.6 Hz) and LS Abrupt (10.1 ± 2.1 Hz) neurons and LS Sustained neurons (10.1 ± 2.3 Hz) were not different (Fig. 4A). Likewise, there was no difference in the mean rate of spontaneous activity between TL (24.4 ± 6.4 Hz) and LS (19.3 ± 3.2 Hz) Inhibited neurons (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. A: spontaneous activity of LS and TL excited neurons from noninflamed and inflamed rats. *P < 0.001. B: spontaneous activity of LS and TL Inhibited neurons.

Response to somatic stimulation of visceroceptive TL and LS neurons and the effect of colonic inflammation

The convergent cutaneous receptive field was examined in 106 cells from noninflamed and inflamed rats. Colonic inflammation did not change the somatic receptive field classification of CRD-responsive neurons. Between 75 and 95% of TL and LS excited neurons (Abrupt and Sustained) had NS- or WDR-type cutaneous receptive fields. In contrast, between 33 and 73% of Inhibited neurons had somatic receptive fields that were inhibited by pinch.

In 57 cells the size of the cutaneous receptive field that responded to pinch was mapped. Because we were trying to represent a three-dimensional structure on a standardized two-dimensional drawing of rats that differed slightly in size, simply determining the area of the receptive field on the drawing of the rat would be inaccurate. Therefore we normalized the size of the receptive field by determining the percentage of the area of the receptive field relative to the area of the entire rat. Before inflammation, there was no difference in the size of the receptive field between Abrupt and Sustained neurons in either the TL or LS spinal segments (Fig. 5). After colonic inflammation, the size of the receptive fields increased for the LS Abrupt and Sustained neurons and the TL Abrupt neurons (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.001 for LS and TL separately). The significant increase in the size of the convergent cutaneous receptive field after colonic inflammation is evidence for inflammation-induced central sensitization.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Effect of colonic inflammation on the convergent cutaneous receptive field for excitatory neurons in the LS and TL spinal segments. Size of the receptive field is represented as the percentage of the total area of the standardized drawing of the rat. Cells from noninflamed rats are shown with white bars and cells from inflamed rats are shown with black bars. *P < 0.001.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

Response of TL and LS neurons to transient CRD and the effects of colonic inflammation

Our group has hypothesized that the TL and LS spinal segments differentially contribute to processing acute and inflammatory colorectal stimuli and the present results support this hypothesis. The TL spinal cord appears less excited by CRD than the LS spinal cord in the absence of colonic inflammation and inflammation increases the level of excitability of the TL spinal cord. This conclusion is based on the following lines of evidence. First, in noninflamed rats four times as many CRD-responsive neurons were inhibited in the TL spinal segments compared with the LS segments and colonic inflammation decreased the percentage of TL Inhibited neurons. Second, the threshold for activating TL neurons was greater than that of LS neurons, but decreased during inflammation. Third, the magnitude of the response to CRD was significantly greater in LS neurons than that in TL neurons. Colonic inflammation increased the response of TL Abrupt neurons, but had a tendency to decrease the response of LS Abrupt neurons. However, inflammation increased the number and magnitude of response of LS Sustained neurons. This increase in the relative number of Sustained neurons in the LS spinal cord of inflamed rats, combined with the observations that inflammation does not induce Abrupt neurons to develop an afterdischarge and colonic inflammation increases the number of CRD-induced Fos labeled cells in the dorsal horn (Traub and Murphy 2002), suggests that increasing the number of neurons that respond to CRD may be as important to developing hyperalgesia as increasing the response of individual dorsal horn neurons. Furthermore, the overall increase in the level of activity of the TL spinal cord combined with the fact that LS dorsal rhizotomy attenuates the CRD-evoked vmr, which is partially reversed during colonic inflammation (Traub 2000), support an enhanced role for the TL spinal segments in processing inflammatory pain.

Discrepancies with the literature

Our results differ from previous work in a number of ways, although all differences can be attributed to experimental design. We found <5% of the TL neurons had sustained afterdischarges with or without mustard oil-induced colorectal inflammation. In contrast, Ness (Ness and Gebhart 1988) reported that 42% of the TL neurons from noninflamed rats had a sustained afterdischarge. In addition they reported that TL and LS Abrupt neurons had similar responses to CRD in contrast to the present results. The likely reason for these differences was that Ness mostly used spinalized rats. Neurons recorded from spinally intact rats had smaller responses. In preliminary studies we observed that cold block causes Abrupt neurons to develop an afterdischarge similar to that of Sustained neurons. Furthermore, abdominal surgery increases the percentage of Sustained neurons in the TL spinal cord segments (Wang and Traub 2004). These data suggest that acute surgery and/or spinalization sufficiently alters neuronal responses to CRD such that data from spinalized and intact preparations are not directly comparable.

Conclusions about the response of different groups of dorsal horn neurons to colonic inflammation may also depend on the experimental design. Although we reported the response of LS Abrupt neurons decrease after inflammation, the opposite result has also been reported (Al-Chaer et al. 1997; Ji et al. 2005; Olivar et al. 2000). Again, experimental design likely contributes to the differences. Our study did not target a particular subset of spinal dorsal horn neurons such as neurons with supraspinal projections in the dorsal columns (Al-Chaer et al. 1997). More interestingly, our study was done in male rats. In contrast, in intact or hormonally modulated female rats the response of Abrupt neurons was facilitated after colonic inflammation and Sustained neurons were not affected (Ji et al. 2005; Olivar et al. 2000). Taken together, these data suggest that spinal neurons responding to visceral stimuli are subject to multiple factors that rigorously influence response characteristics.

Colonic afferent contribution to differential processing of CRD

Although the present data suggest that spinal mechanisms contribute to the differences in excitability of TL and LS dorsal horn neurons to CRD, differences in the properties of colonic primary afferents projecting to the two regions of spinal cord cannot be excluded. The majority of colonic afferents in the rat pelvic nerve in vivo are low threshold fibers that encode stimulus intensity up to 100 mmHg and are sensitized after colonic inflammation (Berkley et al. 1993b; Sengupta and Gebhart 1994; Su et al. 1997). Thoracolumbar colonic afferents in the rat are less well studied (Lin and Al-Chaer 2003). In contrast, feline pelvic nerve (LS) colonic afferents have slightly lower thresholds than those of lumbar splanchnic nerve (TL) colonic afferents, although the stimulus-response functions for these afferents were similar (Blumberg et al. 1983; Janig and Koltzenburg 1991).

In vitro studies from mouse and rat isolated colon–nerve preparations reported splanchnic nerve afferents had higher thresholds than those of pelvic nerve afferents (Brierley et al. 2004; Lynn and Blackshaw 1999). Likewise, the threshold and rheobase recorded from dissociated TL colonic afferent DRG cell bodies were higher than those of LS DRG cell bodies, although the suprathreshold response of TL cells was greater than that of LS cells (Gold and Traub 2004). Although it is difficult to compare punctate stimulation of the isolated, opened colon in vitro to colorectal distention in vivo and determine what are comparable stimuli, or relate membrane properties in vitro to distention thresholds and stimulus-response functions in vivo, the data support lower thresholds, but are equivocal regarding suprathreshold responses by LS versus TL colonic afferents. Therefore, while some of the present observations can probably be attributed to differences in primary afferent input to the spinal cord, peripheral mechanisms cannot account for all the differences in spinal processing of CRD between TL and LS spinal segments.

In conclusion, these results demonstrate a difference between the response of the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spinal cord segments to acute and inflammatory colorectal pain. The neurons responding to CRD in TL segments show less activity compared to those in the LS segment, in terms of the mean magnitude of response, response threshold, and the percentage of excited neurons. The decrease in relative percentage of inhibited neurons and the increase in the response of excited neurons in the thoracolumbar spinal cord after colonic inflammation supports the hypothesis of a differential role for these two regions of spinal cord in processing colorectal pain and hyperalgesia.

	GRANTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-41384.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
We thank Dr. Yaping Ji for helpful comments on the manuscript.

	FOOTNOTES

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. Traub, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland Dental School, Rm. 5-A-22, 666 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201 (E-mail: rtraub{at}umaryland.edu)

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION GRANTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Al-Chaer ED, Lawand NB, Westlund KN, and Willis WD. Pelvic visceral input into the nucleus gracilis is largely mediated by the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. J Neurophysiol 76: 2675–2690, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Al-Chaer ED, Westlund KN, and Willis WD. Sensitization of postsynaptic dorsal column neuronal responses by colon inflammation. Neuroreport 8: 3267–3273, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]

Berkley KJ, Hubscher CH, and Wall PD. Neuronal responses to stimulation of the cervix, uterus, colon, and skin in the rat spinal cord. J Neurophysiol 69: 545–556, 1993a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berkley KJ, Robbins A, and Sato Y. Functional differences between afferent fibers in the hypogastric and pelvic nerves innervating female reproductive organs in the rat. J Neurophysiol 69: 533–544, 1993b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bernstein CN, Niazi N, Robert M, Mertz H, Kodner A, Munakata J, Naliboff B, and Mayer EA. Rectal afferent function in patients with inflammatory and functional intestinal disorders. Pain 66: 151–161, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Blumberg H, Haupt P, Janig W, and Kohler W. Encoding of visceral noxious stimuli in the discharge patterns of visceral afferent fibres from the colon. Pflügers Arch 398: 33–40, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brierley SM, Jones RC III, Gebhart GF, and Blackshaw LA. Splanchnic and pelvic mechanosensory afferents signal different qualities of colonic stimuli in mice. Gastroenterology 127: 166–178, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gold MS and Traub RJ. Cutaneous and colonic rat DRG neurons differ with respect to both baseline and PGE2-induced changes in passive and active electrophysiological properties. J Neurophysiol 91: 2524–2531, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Janig W and Koltzenburg M. Receptive properties of sacral primary afferent neurons supplying the colon. J Neurophysiol 65: 1067–1077, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ji Y, Murphy AZ, and Traub RJ. Estrogen modulates the visceromotor reflex and responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons to colorectal stimulation in the rat. J Neurosci 23: 3908–3915, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ji Y, Tang B, and Traub RJ. Estrogen increases and progesterone decreases behavioral and neuronal responses to colorectal distention following colonic inflammation in the rat. Pain 117: 433–442, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ji Y and Traub RJ. Spinal NMDA receptors contribute to neuronal processing of acute noxious and nonnoxious colorectal stimulation in the rat. J Neurophysiol 86: 1783–1791, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ji Y and Traub RJ. Differential effects of spinal CNQX on two populations of dorsal horn neurons responding to colorectal distention in the rat. Pain 99: 217–222, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]

Katter JT, Dado RJ, Kostarczyk E, and Giesler GJJ. Spinothalamic and spinohypothalamic tract neurons in the sacral spinal cord of rats. II. Responses to cutaneous and visceral stimuli. J Neurophysiol 75: 2606–2628, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kolhekar R and Gebhart GF. Modulation of spinal visceral nociceptive transmission by NMDA receptor activation in the rat. J Neurophysiol 75: 2344–2353, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kozlowski CM, Bountra C, and Grundy D. The effect of fentanyl, DNQX and MK-801 on dorsal horn neurones responsive to colorectal distention in the anaesthetized rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 12: 239–247, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Laird JMA, Olivar T, Lopez-Garcia JA, Maggi CA, and Cervero F. Responses of rat spinal neurons to distention of inflamed colon: role of tachykinin NK2 receptors. Neuropharmacology 40: 696–701, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lin C and Al-Chaer ED. Long-term sensitization of primary afferents in adult rats exposed to neonatal colon pain. Brain Res 971: 73–82, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lynn PA and Blackshaw LA. In vitro recordings of afferent fibres with receptive fields in the serosa, muscle and mucosa of rat colon. J Physiol 518: 271–282, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mayer EA and Gebhart GF. Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hyperalgesia. Gastroenterology 107: 271–293, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]

Mayer EA and Raybould HE. Role of visceral afferent mechanisms in functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 99: 1688–1704, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]

Nadelhaft I and Booth AM. The location and morphology of preganglionic neurons and the distribution of visceral afferents from the rat pelvic nerve: a horseradish peroxidase study. J Comp Neurol 226: 238–245, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ness TJ and Gebhart GF. Characterization of neuronal responses to noxious visceral and somatic stimuli in the medial lumbosacral spinal cord of the rat. J Neurophysiol 57: 1867–1892, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ness TJ and Gebhart GF. Characterization of neurons responsive to noxious colorectal distention in the T13–L2 spinal cord of the rat. J Neurophysiol 60: 1419–1438, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ness TJ and Gebhart GF. Characterization of superficial T13–L2 dorsal horn neurons encoding for colorectal distention in the rat: comparison with neurons in deep laminae. Brain Res 486: 301–309, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ness TJ and Gebhart GF. Interactions between visceral and cutaneous nociception in the rat. I. Noxious cutaneous stimuli inhibit visceral nociceptive neurons and reflexes. J Neurophysiol 66: 20–28, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ness TJ and Gebhart GF. Acute inflammation differentially alters the activity of two classes of rat spinal visceral nociceptive neurons. Neurosci Lett 281: 131–134, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ness TJ and Gebhart GF. Inflammation enhances reflex and spinal neuron responses to noxious visceral stimulation in rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 280: G649–G657, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ness TJ, Randich A, and Gebhart GF. Further evidence that colorectal distention is a noxious visceral stimulus in rats. Neurosci Lett 131: 113–116, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Olivar T, Cervero F, and Laird JM. Responses of rat spinal neurones to natural and electrical stimulation of colonic afferents: effect of inflammation. Brain Res 866: 168–177, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Qin C, Chandler MJ, Miller KE, and Foreman RD. Chemical activation of cervical cell bodies: effects on responses to colorectal distention in lumbosacral spinal cord of rats. J Neurophysiol 82: 3423–3433, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sengupta JN and Gebhart GF. Characterization of mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the colon of the rat. J Neurophysiol 71: 2046–2060, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Su X, Sengupta JN, and Gebhart GF. Effects of kappa opioid receptor-selective agonists on responses of pelvic nerve afferents to noxious colorectal distention. J Neurophysiol 78: 1003–1012, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tattersall JE, Cervero F, and Lumb BM. Effects of reversible spinalization on the visceral input to viscerosomatic neurons in the lower thoracic spinal cord of the cat. J Neurophysiol 56: 785–796, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Traub RJ. Evidence for thoracolumbar spinal cord processing of inflammatory, but not acute colonic pain. Neuroreport 11: 2113–2116, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]

Traub RJ, Hutchcroft K, and Gebhart GF. The peptide content of colonic afferents decreases following colonic inflammation. Peptides 20: 267–273, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Traub RJ and Murphy AZ. Colonic inflammation induces Fos expression in the thoracolumbar spinal cord increasing activity in the spinoparabrachial pathway. Pain 95: 93–102, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wang G and Traub RJ. Pelvic neurectomy alters the response of thoracolumbar dorsal horn neurons to colonic stimulation. Soc Neurosci Abst 286.5, 2004.

Wang G and Traub RJ. Differential response properties of thoracolumbar and lumbosacral visceroceptive dorsal horn neurons in the rat. Soc Neurosci Abstr 63.9, 2003.

Zhang J, Chandler MJ, and Foreman RD. Thoracic visceral inputs use upper cervical segments to inhibit lumbar spinal neurons in rats. Brain Res 709: 337–342, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhuo M, Sengupta JN, and Gebhart GF. Biphasic modulation of spinal visceral nociceptive transmission from the rostroventral medial medulla in the rat. J Neurophysiol 87: 2225–2236, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Lin, G. Tian, K. Roman, C. Handy, J. B. Travers, C.-l. G. Lin, and R. L. Stephens Jr. Increased glial glutamate transporter EAAT2 expression reduces visceral nociceptive response in mice Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): G129 - G134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ji, A. Z. Murphy, and R. J. Traub Sex differences in morphine-induced analgesia of visceral pain are supraspinally and peripherally mediated Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): R307 - R314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 94/6/3788    most recent 00230.2005v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, G. Articles by Traub, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, G. Articles by Traub, R. J.