| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan
Submitted 26 May 2005; accepted in final form 28 September 2005
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; McAndrew and Milner 1991; Milner 1971; Milner et al. 1991; Shimamura et al. 1990). Animal lesion studies also strongly implicated the prefrontal cortex in temporal order memory. Petrides (1991) found that monkeys with lesions involving the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were impaired in judging the order of object stimuli that had been presented in the middle of a list of objects. Similarly, rats with medial prefrontal lesions performed poorly on tests of temporal order memory for spatial locations (Chiba et al. 1994; Kesner and Holdbrook 1987). These studies of humans and animals with focal brain damage support the idea that the prefrontal cortex plays an important role in memory for temporal order.
On the other hand, many electrophysiological studies have provided evidence that the lateral prefrontal cortex participates in the process of temporary storage of spatial or object information (Chafee and Goldman-Rakic 1998; Constantinidis et al. 2001; di Pellegrino and Wise 1991, 1993; Funahashi et al. 1989, 1993b; Fuster 1973; Fuster et al. 1982; Kubota and Niki 1971; Kubota et al. 1974; Miller et al. 1996; Niki 1974; Niki and Watanabe 1976; Rainer et al. 1998a; Rao et al. 1997; Sawaguchi and Yamane 1999; Takeda and Funahashi 2002; Watanabe 1981; Wilson et al. 1993). Tonic delay-period activity with directional selectivity or object selectivity has been considered to be a neuronal correlate of temporal storage mechanism for spatial or object information in the prefrontal cortex.
A few studies showed prefrontal neuronal activities when monkeys retain information on multiple items simultaneously. Barone and Joseph (1989) recorded prefrontal neuronal activities while a monkey performed a delayed-response task in which a monkey was required to memorize three target positions and the temporal order of presentation and to respond by performing sequential saccades and hand-reaching movements toward the targets in the same temporal order. They found that one class of prefrontal neurons exhibit tonic activity with spatial and temporal selectivity, such that tonic activity was observed only when the first visual cue was presented at one particular position out of three. Funahashi et al. (1997) recorded prefrontal neuronal activities while a monkey performed a delayed sequential reaching task, in which the monkey is required to memorize two of three target positions and the temporal order of presentation and to respond by performing hand-reaching movements toward the targets in the same temporal order. They found two types of delay-period activity: position-dependent and pair-dependent activities. Position-dependent delay-period activity is a selective response to one of three positions. Most of the position-dependent activities arise when a cue is presented at a particular position in a particular temporal order. Pair-dependent delay-period activity is a selective response to a particular combination of two of three positions. Most of the pair-dependent activities arise when two cues are presented in a particular temporal order. Ninokura et al. (2003) found that 43% of delay-period activity is selective for the sequence in which visual objects are presented during the cue period. They further found that 31% of this activity was selective for only one of six sequences, and the remaining activity was selective for multiple sequences. These findings suggest that prefrontal neurons can retain information on multiple items (spatial positions or objects) and the temporal order of cue presentation. However, Ninokura et al. (2003) found the delay-period activity that was selective for multiple sequences, but they did not clarify what information was coded in this delay-period activity. In addition, Funahashi et al. (1997) and Ninokura et al. (2003) used tasks in which monkeys had to memorize spatial locations or objects and to respond by performing sequential movements toward memorized locations or objects, and analyzed neuronal activity during only delay period preceding the sequential movements. Thus these prefrontal neuronal activities could reflect the preparation for the first or second movement or sequential movements. Indeed, there were delay-period activities that coded the direction of movements rather than the location of the cue (Funahashi et al. 1993b; Niki and Watanabe 1976; Takeda and Funahashi 2002). To clarify the neuronal mechanism for the retention of information on multiple items simultaneously, it is necessary to dissociate memorized items and preparation for movements.
In this study, we introduced a serial probe reproduction (SPR) task, in which a monkey had to memorize two objects and their order of presentation, and one target object was selected from two memorized objects on the basis of a color stimulus. In this task, because the target object was determined on the basis of the color cue during the color cue period, monkeys could not determine the target object until the color cue period. Thus the memory during the first and second delay periods must be nothing else but the two objects and their order of presentation.
Previous studies indicated that neurons with cue-period and delay-period activities exhibited a similar spatial or object preference between the cue and delay periods, suggesting that the visual input to the prefrontal cortex plays an important role in contrasting delay-period activity (Funahashi and Inoue 2000; Funahashi et al. 1990; O'Scalaidhe et al. 1999). Recently, Ninokura et al. (2004) have found visual responses in the lateral prefrontal cortex that depend on both the object and the order of object presentation. However, because Ninokura et al. (2004) did not analyze the relationship between visual response and delay-period activity, the functional role of these responses in the process of encoding object information and temporal order information has not been clarified. To examine this issue, we analyzed prefrontal neuronal activities during the first and second cue periods of the SPR task and compared the visual response and delay-period activity.
In addition, the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) plays a crucial role in response selection, which is the ultimate goal of purposeful behavior. Many studies showed that the responses of the prefrontal cortex to visual stimuli are related to the selection of an object from an array of objects (Hasegawa et al. 2000; Iba and Sawaguchi 2002) and the selection of forthcoming movements based on external stimuli (Hasegawa et al. 1998; Hoshi and Tanji 2004; Hoshi et al. 2000; Kim and Shadlen 1999; Sakagami and Niki 1994a,b; Sakagami and Tsutsui 1999; Sakagami et al. 2001; Watanabe 1986). These results suggest that the LPFC contributes to the retrieval of one object from the working memory. Although a few human neuroimaging studies showed that the LPFC is also involved in the retrieval of one item from the working memory (Rowe and Passingham 2001; Rowe et al. 2000), the neuronal mechanism for the retrieval of one item from the working memory in the LPFC has not been clarified. To investigate the neuronal mechanism in the LPFC for this process, we analyzed neuronal activity during the color cue period of the SPR task. In this period, a monkey retrieves one object from two memorized objects. These data were reported elsewhere in abstract form (Inoue and Mikami 2001, 2002a,b, 2003).
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
We used one male and one female rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta; monkey G, 9 kg; monkey H, 5 kg). Experiments were conducted according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Institute of Health and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Primates by the Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University.
The monkey was seated on a primate chair in a dark room, and a head-restraining device was fixed its head. It was trained to look at a 17-in CRT monitor (FlexScan T565, Nanao), which was placed 40 cm from its face. A computer (PC-9821Xa200, NEC) presented a fixation spot and a stimulus on the CRT monitor. The monkey's horizontal and vertical eye positions were sampled at 250 Hz with a monitoring system using an infrared camera (R-21C-AC, RMS Hirosaki). Sampled eye positions were fed into a computer (PC-9801BX, NEC) through an A/D converter to determine whether the monkey maintained its fixation and performed a correct saccade.
Behavioral task
The monkeys were trained to perform an SPR task (Fig. 1A). In this task, after a 1-s intertrial interval, a fixation spot (a white circle; 0.1° diam) was presented at the center of the monitor. After the monkey maintained its fixation for 1.5 s, the first object cue (C1), which was one of three objects (a double cone, a cross, and a circle, 3° x 3° in size), was presented at the center of the monitor for 0.5 s. After 1 s of the first delay (D1) period, the second object cue (C2), which was one of the two remaining objects, was presented at the center of the monitor for 0.5 s. After 1 s of the second delay (D2) period, a color cue (a red or a green rectangle, 3° x 3°) was presented at the center of the monitor for 0.5 s. The presentation of a color cue was followed by the third delay (D3) period of 1–1.5 s. Then the three objects were presented in the upper, lower left, and lower right positions at 9° of eccentricity from the center of the monitor. The fixation spot was extinguished simultaneously. When the color cue was red, the monkey had to perform a saccade to the object presented as the first cue (C1), and when the color cue was green, the monkey had to perform a saccade to the object presented as the second cue (C2). We prepared three patterns of arrangement of target objects (Fig. 1D), and one of the patterns was randomly selected during the response period. Therefore the monkeys could not determine the spatial location to which a saccade should be performed until the appearance of objects during the response period.
|
The monkeys also performed a fixation task (Fig. 1C), which allows the examination of neuronal activity when selection was not required. While the monkey maintained its fixation, we presented a color stimulus, which was the same as that used in the SPR task.
Surgical procedure
To fix the head during training, a head-restraining device was attached to the skull. Surgery was performed under aseptic conditions. The monkeys were first administered ketamine (10 mg/kg body weight) intramuscularly, and then an intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium (20 mg/kg body weight). After partially exposing the skull, polycarbonate screws (3 mm in diameter and 5 mm in length) were used to attach firmly the head-restraining device to the skull. These screws and the head-restraining device were fixed with dental acrylic resin. The monkeys were administered systemic antibiotics for 1 wk after surgery and were allowed free access to water and chow for at least 1 wk after surgery.
After the training was completed, surgery for attaching a recording chamber was performed under aseptic conditions. We performed MRI before surgery, and on the basis of this MRI, we determined the stereotaxic position of the principal sulcus. The position of the recording chamber (anterior-posterior = 32 mm and lateral = 18 mm) was determined by this sterotaxic coordination.
Training procedure
The monkeys were first trained to perform the DMS task. When the monkeys showed an 80% correct performance or higher for 2 wk, the monkeys were trained to perform the SPR task. The SPR task training was divided into three stages. In stage 1, the monkeys were trained to perform the red cue trials, in which the monkeys had to select the C1 object. During the early period of training, the duration of C2 presentation was 100 ms. When the monkeys showed a 70% correct performance or higher for 2 wk, the duration of C2 presentation was progressively extended to 500 ms. In stage 2, monkeys were trained to perform the green cue trials, in which the monkeys had to select the C2 object. During the early period of training, the duration of C1 presentation was 100 ms. When the monkeys showed a 70% correct performance or higher for 2 wk, the duration of C1 presentation was progressively extended to 500 ms. In stage 3, we intermingled the red cue trials and green cue trials. The training was considered completed when the monkeys showed a 70% correct performance or higher for 2 wk. The training process was completed in 
18 (monkey G) and 24 (monkey H) mo.
Recording procedure and data analysis
Neuronal activity was recorded using glass-coated Elgiloy microelectrodes (1–2 M
). Single-neuronal activity was isolated and converted to pulses by a window discriminator (DIS-1, BAK), and stored with task events as a data file on a hard disk. Recording sites were determined by MRI. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was defined as the region dorsal to the principal sulcus, and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) was defined as the region ventral to the principal sulcus (Fig. 2). To determine whether the recording site was in the frontal eye field, we applied intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) through the tips of inserted electrodes (22 pulses of 0.25-ms duration at 333 Hz; current intensity, 100 µA). In this study, there were no recording sites where ICMS evoked saccades.
|
When we analyzed neuronal activity during the D1 and D2 periods, we constructed six histograms and rasters for each combination of C1 and C2 objects aligned at the start of the D1 and D2 periods. We calculated mean discharge rate during the last 1-s interval of the fixation period (control period) and the D1 and D2 periods. First, we analyzed neuronal activity during the D1 period when the mean discharge rate during the D1 period was significantly different from that during the control period (Mann-Whitney U test; P < 0.05); we considered that the neuron had a significant delay-period activity. We considered that delay-period activity was object-selective when the difference was significant as determined by ANOVA (P < 0.05).
A significant response during the D2 period was determined similarly (Mann-Whitney U test; P < 0.05). To determine whether delay-period activity during the D2 period depends on the C1 object, C2 object, or one sequence, we compared delay-period activities during the D2 period under six trial conditions by ANOVA. When the difference in delay-period activity under the six trial conditions was significant (P < 0.05), we compared the highest delay-period activity with other delay-period activities by a post hoc test (Fisher's PLSD) and determined whether delay-period activity was selective in only one sequence. Results showed that there were no neurons activated during the D2 period in only one of six sequences, and the delay-period activity depended on either the C1 object or the C2 object. We calculated selectivity index for the C1 object (SIC1) and that for the C2 object (SIC2). SI is defined as
 |
 |
We classified object-selective delay-period activities into three types: order-nonselective activity, C1-coding activity, and C2-coding activity. In a neuron with order nonselective activity, delay-period activity during the D1 period depended on the C1 object, delay-period activity during the D2 period depended on the C2 object, and the preferred objects during the D1 and D2 periods were identical. In a neuron with C1-coding activity, delay-period activity during the D1 and/or D2 period depended on the C1 object. In a neuron with C2-coding activity, delay-period activity during the D1 period was not detected or object-nonselective, but delay-period activity during the D2 period depended on the C2 object.
When we analyzed neuronal activity during the color cue period, six averaged perievent time histograms (2 colors and 3 objects to which a saccade should be performed) triggered by the onset of the color cue were constructed (bin width, 10 ms). From these histograms, when a neuron exhibited an excitatory response, the histogram with the highest peak value was chosen for determining the response window, and when a neuron exhibited an inhibitory response, the histogram with the lowest peak value was chosen. In this histogram, the starting point of response (the time at which the 1st 3 consecutive bins differed from discharge rates for 1 s before the color cue presentation by >2 SD or <2 SD) and the endpoint of response (the time of the last bin) were determined. The time from the onset of the color cue to the starting point of the response window was taken as onset latency. When the discharge rate of a neuron during the response window of the color cue period differed significantly (Mann-Whitney U test) from that during the fixation period (for 1 s before the 1st cue period), we concluded that the neuron exhibited a response. We performed two-way ANOVA of the response magnitude during the color cue period in terms of the color (red or green) and target (object to which a saccade should be performed; a double cone, a cross, or a circle) factors. When the difference in response magnitude in terms of the color factor was significant and the difference in terms of the target factor was not significant, we considered the neuron as having a C response. When the difference in response magnitude in terms of the color factor was not significant and the difference in response magnitude in terms of the target factor was significant, we considered the neuron as having a T response. When the difference in response magnitude in terms of both the color factor and target factor were significant or the difference of interaction was significant, we considered the neuron as having a CT response.
When we analyzed neuronal activity during the D3 period, six averaged perievent time histograms (2 colors and 3 objects to which a saccade should be performed) triggered by the offset of the color cue were constructed (bin width, 50 ms). When the discharge rate of a neuron during the first 1 s of the D3 period differed significantly (Mann-Whitney U test) from that during the fixation period (for 1 s before the 1st cue period), we concluded that the neuron exhibited delay-period activity during the D3 period. We performed two-way ANOVA of delay-period activity during the D3 period in terms of the color (red or green) and the target (object to which a saccade should be performed; a double cone, a cross, or a circle) factors. When the difference in response magnitude in terms of the color factor was significant and the difference in response magnitude in terms of the target factor was not significant, we considered the neuron as having a C delay-period activity. When the difference in response magnitude in terms of the color factor was not significant and the difference in response magnitude in terms of the target factor was significant, we considered the neuron as having a T delay-period activity. When the difference in response magnitude in terms of both the color factor and target factor were significant or the difference of interaction was significant, we considered the neuron as having a CT delay-period activity.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Two monkeys performed the SPR task well but not perfectly. The chance level of this task is 33%, and the monkeys performed much higher than the chance level. We examined performance accuracy during trials for all recording sessions. The mean correct percent during recording trials was 75 ± 5% (SD) for monkey G and 70 ± 3% for monkey H. There was no tendency for direction preference, but there was tendency for object preference. Both monkeys performed better when the target object was a circle (84 ± 10% for monkey G, 88 ± 9% for monkey H) than when the target object was a double cone (70 ± 6% for monkey G, 62 ± 6% for monkey H) or a cross (72 ± 8% for monkey G, 66 ± 7% for monkey G). Monkey G performed better in the trials in which the C2 object was the target (86 ± 7%) than in the trials in which the C1 object was the target (66 ± 6%). In contrast, for monkey H, there was no difference in performance between the trials in which the C1 object was the target (69 ± 5%) and the trials in which the C2 object was the target (71 ± 5%). The mean latencies for saccades from the onset of target object presentation were 284 ± 105 ms for monkey G and 260 ± 89 ms for monkey H.
Neuronal database
While two monkeys performed the SPR task, we recorded the activity of 611 single neurons from the DLPFC (n = 173) and the VLPFC (n = 438). Of these neurons, 483 responded during at least one epoch of the SPR task. Of these, 119 neurons showed a response during the C1 and/or C2 period, 183 neurons exhibited delay-period activity during the D1 and/or D2 period, 139 neurons showed a response during the color cue period, 260 neurons showed delay-period activity during the D3 period, and 361 neurons exhibited a response during the response period. In this paper, we focused on neuronal activity in the C1, D1, C2, D2, color cue, and D3 periods, and we will deal with the response period in a separate report.
Object-selective response during C1 and C2 periods
During the C1 and/or C2 periods, 119 neurons exhibited responses. Of these, 81 neurons showed the object-selective response during the C1 or C2 period. Of these, 22 neurons showed response magnitudes that were not significantly different between the C1 and C2 periods (order-nonselective). On the other hand, the magnitudes of responses of 59 neurons during the C1 and C2 periods were significantly different (order-selective). Of these neurons, 33 showed larger response magnitudes during the C1 period than during the C2 period (C1-dominant), and 26 showed larger response magnitudes during the C2 period than during the C1 period (C2-dominant).
Figure 3A shows the histograms of the C1-dominant response of a neuron. During the C1 period, the neuron exhibited a large response magnitude (36.92 spikes/s) to the circle, a small response magnitude (20.22 spikes/s) to the cross, and no response to the double cone. Although the activity slightly increased in all trial conditions toward the end of the D1 period, discharge rates during the D1 period were not significantly different from those during the control period. During the C2 period, this neuron did not respond to any of the three visual stimuli. The difference in response magnitude was significant in terms of both the object [F(2,228) = 8.62, P < 0.0005] and order factors [F(1,228) = 29.72, P < 0.0001). Therefore this neuron was considered as having the C1-dominant response, and we defined the circle as the preferred object of this neuron.
|
To compare the temporal profiles of the order-nonselective, C1-dominant, and C2-dominant responses, we constructed population histograms of these responses (Fig. 4A). Neurons with the order-nonselective response showed large responses to the preferred object presented during both C1 and C2 periods (Fig. 4A, black lines). Neurons with the C1-dominant and C2-dominant responses showed large responses to the preferred object presented during the C1 and C2 period, respectively. Although these differential responses depended on the object and/or the order of presentation, the temporal profiles of the order-nonselective, C1-dominant, and C2-dominant responses were similar. Figure 4B shows the cumulative summation curves of the latencies of the order-nonselective, C1-dominant, and C2-dominant responses. During the C1 period, the mean latencies of responses were 137 ± 44 (order-nonselective), 124 ± 34 (C1-dominant), and 127 ± 51 ms (C2-dominant). During the C2 period, the mean latencies of responses were 160 ± 45 (order-nonselective), 137 ± 70 (C1-dominant), and 141 ± 56 ms (C2-dominant). Although the difference in latency among these responses was not statistically significant [F(2,123) = 1.48, P > 0.05], the latencies of the C1-dominant and C2-dominant responses were slightly shorter than that of the order-nonselective response. The durations of these responses were also not different. During the C1 period, the mean durations of responses were 172 ± 25 (order-nonselective) and 156 ± 15 ms (C1-dominant). During the C2 period, the mean durations of responses were 154 ± 21 (order-nonselective) and 157 ± 14 ms (C2-dominant). The difference in durations among these responses was not statistically significant [F(2,123) = 0.06, P > 0.05].
|
C1 objects modulated responses during C2 period
We examined whether responses during the C2 period were affected by the C1 object. Among neurons with the C1-dominant response (n = 33), most of these neurons (n = 32) did not show a significant difference in response magnitude during the C2 period depending on the C1 object presented (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05). Among neurons with the C2-dominant response (n = 26), 35% (n = 9) showed a significant difference in response magnitude during the C2 period depending on the C1 object presented (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.05).
Figure 5 shows an example of the C2-dominant response of a neuron that varied depending on the C1 object presented. As shown in Fig. 5A, the neuron exhibited the response when the cross was presented, and the response magnitude during the C2 period (34.43 spikes/s) was significantly larger than that during the C1 period (16.49 spikes/s). The magnitude of response to the cross during the C2 period varied significantly with the C1 (Fig. 5B). When the double cone was presented during the C1 period, the magnitude of response to the cross during the C2 period was 22.31 spikes/s. When the circle was presented during the C1 period, the magnitude of response to the cross during the C2 period was 46.15 spikes/s. These response magnitudes were significantly different (z = 4.13; P < 0.0001).
|
Order-selective response magnitudes were significantly different between the C1 period and C2 period. This difference could be caused by the enhancement or suppression of responses during the C1 or C2 period. To test this hypothesis, we compared responses during the SPR task with those during the DMS task. Figure 6A shows the C1-dominant response of a neuron during the SPR task and that during the DMS task. The neuron responded when the double cone was presented during the C1 period (34.92 spikes/s), but did not respond when the same double cone was presented during the C2 period. During the DMS task, the magnitude of response to the double cone (35.61 spikes/s) was similar to that during the C1 period of the SPR task. The response magnitude during the cue period of the DMS task was not significantly different (Mann-Whitney U test, z = 0.03, P > 0.05) from that during the C1 period of the SPR task, and was significantly larger (z = 4.18; P < 0.0001) than that during the C2 period of the SPR task. Among seven tested neurons with the C1-dominant response, five showed a similar response magnitude during the DMS task to that during the C1 period of the SPR task (Fig. 6B).
|
Object-selective response during C1 and C2 periods in error trials
To evaluate the behavioral significance of neuronal activity, we examined neuronal activity when the monkeys incorrectly performed. Although we observed two types of error in the SPR task, breaking the fixation during the cue or delay period and making a saccade to an incorrect target object during the response period, we analyzed error trials in which the monkeys had to make a saccade to a preferred object but made a saccade to an incorrect object.
To evaluate the behavioral significance of the object-selective and order-selective responses during the C1 and C2 periods in encoding information regarding the object and order of presentation, we compared the response to the preferred object in the correct trials with that in the error trials. The order-nonselective response magnitudes in the correct trials were not significantly different from those in the error trials during both the C1 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, z = 0.43, P > 0.05, mean = 31.87 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 30.76 spikes/s in error trials) and the C2 (z = 1.61, P > 0.05, mean = 35.26 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 33.73 spikes/s in error trials) periods (Fig. 7A). The C1-dominant response magnitudes in the correct trials were also not significantly different from those in the error trials during both the C1 (z = 0.64, P > 0.05, mean = 47.35 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 46.68 spikes/s in error trials) and the C2 (z = 0.27, P > 0.05, mean = 30.88 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 29.63 spikes/s in error trials) periods (Fig. 7B). C2-dominant response magnitude (Fig. 7C) was not significantly different between the correct and error trials during the C1 period (z = 1.01, P > 0.05, mean = 22.51 s/s in correct trials, mean = 21.00 spikes/s in error trials), but was significantly smaller in the error trials than in the correct trials during the C2 period (z = 2.50, P < 0.05, mean = 38.20 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 31.48 s/s in error trials).
|
Thirty-eight neurons showed the object-nonselective response. Of these, 17 neurons showed the order-nonselective response, and 21 neurons showed the C1-dominant response. No neurons showed the C2-dominant response.
To compare the temporal profiles between the object-selective and object-nonselective responses, we constructed the histograms of these population activities (Fig. 8A). We could not find differences in latency and duration between the object-selective and object-nonselective responses in the order-nonselective response. However, in the C1-dominant response, the latency of the object-selective response was slightly shorter than that of the object-nonselective response. Figure 8B shows the difference in response latency. Neurons with the object-selective and order-selective responses were activated early, and the latencies of the object-nonselective and order-nonselective responses were slightly longer.
|
One hundred eighty-three neurons were activated during the D1 and/or D2 period. Of these, 52 neurons exhibited object-nonselective delay-period activity during the D1 and/or D2 period. In the remaining 131 neurons, delay-period activity during the D1 and/or D2 period showed object selectivity. We classified these delay-period activities into three types: order-nonselective activity, C1-coding activity, and C2-coding activity.
Figure 9A shows the histograms of the order-nonselective delay-period activity of a neuron. The neuron exhibited delay-period activity during the D1 period when the C1 object was a circle (Fig. 9, A, trial conditions 5 and 6, and B). This delay-period activity during the D1 period was object-selective [F(2,142) = 73.29, P < 0.0001], and the activity returned to the baseline level after the appearance of the C2 object. During the D2 period, this neuron exhibited delay-period activity after the circle was presented as C2 (Fig. 9, A, trial conditions 2 and 4, and C). When the double cone or the cross was presented as C2, this neuron showed an increase in activity at the end of the D2 period (Fig. 9A, trial conditions 1, 3, 5, and 6), and discharge rates during the D2 period of these trials were not significantly different from those during the control period (Fig. 9C). The delay-period activity during the D2 period had selectivity [F(5,139) = 57.41, P < 0.0001). This neuron showed the highest delay-period activity during the D2 period in trial condition 4, and this delay-period activity was significantly different (P < 0.05) from those in trial conditions 1, 3, 5, and 6, and not significantly different (P > 0.05) from that in trial condition 2. This indicates that this delay-period activity during the D2 period was not selective in only one sequence. SIC1 (0.41) was lower than SIC2 (0.98). Therefore delay-period activity during the D2 period depended on the C2 object. Thus we classified neuronal activities depending on the degree of selectivity for both stimuli, when the delay-period activity during the D2 period was selective in terms of the C1 and C2 objects (see METHODS). In this neuron, delay-period activity was detected after the circle cue was presented as C1 or C2, and the delay-period activity during the D1 or D2 period returned to the baseline level when the C2 object or color cue was presented, respectively. Thus this delay-period activity was order-nonselective, and we defined the circle as the preferred object of this neuron. Thirty-eight neurons showed order-nonselective excitatory delay-period activity, and two neurons showed a significant decrease in activity during the delay periods.
|
|
|
|
Temporal profile of delay-period activities
To compare temporal profiles among order-nonselective, C1-coding, and C2-coding delay-period activities, we constructed the population histograms of these activities (Fig. 13, A–D). In these figures, red lines indicate population activities in trials in which the preferred object was presented during the C1 period, and green lines indicate population activities in trials in which the preferred object was presented during the C2 period. Blue lines indicate differences between the red and green lines. The starting point of difference in delay-period activity (the time at which the 1st 3 consecutive bins differed from the difference of activity for 1 s of the control period by >2 SD or <2 SD) and the endpoint (the time of the last bin) of the difference in delay-period activity were determined. For order-nonselective delay-period activity, when the preferred object was presented as C1, population activity was elicited at 125 ms after C1 presentation and continued during the delay period until 100 ms after C2 presentation (Fig. 13, A and E, red line). When the preferred object was presented as C2, population activity was elicited at 175 ms after C2 presentation and continued during the delay period until 100 ms after color cue presentation (Fig. 13, A, green line, and E, red line). For the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity, a difference in population activity was first observed 275 ms after C1 presentation and continued until 200 ms after C2 presentation (Fig. 13, B, blue line, and E, green line). Although population activity showed delay-period activity during the D2 period, a difference could not be found during the D2 period. A significant difference in C1-coding (D2) delay-period activity could not also be found during the D1 period, and it was first observed 325 ms after C2 presentation, and during the D2 period, population activity increased toward the end of the delay period until 600 ms after color cue presentation (Fig. 13, C and E, blue lines). A significant difference in C2-coding delay-period activity could not be found during the D1 period, and it was first observed 275 ms after C2 presentation, and population activity increased toward the end of the delay period until 175 ms after color cue presentation (Fig. 13, D, blue line, and E, light blue line).
|
To evaluate the importance of order-nonselective and order-selective (C1-coding and C2-coding) delay-period activities in retaining information regarding the object cue and order of presentation, we examined neuronal activity during the DMS task, in which the monkey had to memorize only one object information during the delay period. Of 131 neurons with object-selective delay-period activity during the SPR task, 42 neurons were also tested for their activity during the DMS task.
Figure 14 shows two examples of neuronal activity during the DMS task. Figure 14A shows the activity during the DMS task of a neuron, whose activity during the SPR task is shown in Fig. 9. This neuron showed order-nonselective delay-period activity during the SPR task, and the preferred object was the circle. During the DMS task, this neuron exhibited excitatory delay-period activity (early 1 s, z = –4.51, P < 0.0001; last 1 s, z = –3.85, P < 0.0001) when the object cue was the circle. This delay-period activity was object-selective during both the first 1 s [F(2,54) = 20.83, P < 0.0001] and the last 1 s [F(2,54) = 4.39, P < 0.05] of the delay period.
|
Nineteen neurons with order-nonselective delay-period activity were also tested during the DMS task. Of these, 18 (95%) neurons exhibited object-selective delay-period activity during the DMS task, and 1 (5%) neuron showed object-nonselective delay-period activity (Fig. 14C). Fifteen neurons with C1-coding delay-period activity and five neurons with C2-coding delay-period activity were tested during the DMS task. Of these, 2 (10%) neurons exhibited object-selective delay-period activity during the DMS task, 13 (65%) neurons showed object-nonselective delay-period activity, and 5 (25%) neurons did not exhibit delay-period activity (Fig. 14D).
Delay-period activity in error trials
To evaluate the importance of order-nonselective and order-selective (C1-coding and C2-coding) delay-period activities in retaining information regarding the object cue and order of presentation during the D1 and D2 periods, we compared discharge rates during the delay period between the correct trials and error trials in all neurons with object-selective delay-period activity (Fig. 15, A–D). In the neurons with order-nonselective delay-period activity, the delay-period activity was not significantly different between the correct and error trials during both the D1 (Fig. 15A; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, z = –0.24, P > 0.05, mean = 20.25 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 20.60 spikes/s in error trials) and D2 (Fig. 15B; z = –0.98, P > 0.05, mean = 23.43 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 24.23 spikes/s in error trials) periods. In contrast, neurons with C1-coding (Fig. 15C) and C2-coding (Fig. 15D) delay-period activities showed significantly weaker delay-period activities during the error trials than during the correct trials (C1-coding activity, z = –1.96, P < 0.05, mean = 23.19 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 21.45 spikes/s in error trials; C2-coding activity, z = –2.23, P < 0.05, mean = 24.18 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 18.04 spikes/s in error trials).
|
Relationship between neuronal activities during C1/C2 periods and D1/D2 periods
To study the relationship between neuronal activities during the cue and delay periods, we compared the preferred object of individual neurons that had both visual and delay-period activities. During the SPR task, about one-half of the neurons with the object-selective response to the object cue also exhibited object-selective delay-period activity (Table 1). Among neurons with the order-nonselective object-selective response, eight (36%) also exhibited object-selective delay-period activity. Most of these neurons exhibited order-nonselective delay-period activity. Figure 16A shows an example of the activity of a neuron with both the order-nonselective response during the C1 and C2 periods and order-nonselective delay-period activity during the D1 and D2 periods. In this histogram, black lines indicate activity in trials in which C1 was the preferred object, and gray lines indicate activity in trials in which C2 was the preferred object. This neuron showed a response when the preferred object (circle) was presented and showed delay-period activity following the presentation of the preferred object. Among neurons with the C1-dominant object-selective response, eight (24%) also exhibited object-selective delay-period activity. Figure 16C shows an example of the activity of a neuron with both the C1-dominant response and C2-coding delay-period activity. Among neurons with the C2-dominant object-selective response, 13 (50%) also exhibited object-selective delay-period activity. These neurons exhibited order-nonselective, C1-coding (D2), C2-coding delay-period activity. However, for the majority of these neurons, object preferences were different between the object cue period and delay period. Figure 16E shows an example of the activity of a neuron with the C2-dominant response and C1-coding (D2) delay-period activity. In this neuron, the preferred object during the cue period was the double cone and the preferred object during the delay period was the circle.
|
|
To examine how many neurons showed anticipatory activity preceding the C2 presentation, we compared activity for 500 ms preceding the C2 presentation with activity for 500 ms preceding the C1 presentation by repeated measures ANOVA. In the neurons with the order-nonselective response, 10 (45%) neurons did not show a significant increase or decrease in activity during the pre-C2 period, 10 (45%) neurons showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in activity during the pre-C2 period, and 2 (10%) neurons showed a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in activity during the pre-C2 period. In the neurons with the C1-dominant response, 17 (52%) neurons did not show a significant increase or decrease in activity during the pre-C2 period, 9 (27%) neurons showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in activity during the pre-C2 period, and 7 (21%) neurons showed a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in activity during the pre-C2 period. In the neurons with the C2-dominant response, 10 (38%) neurons did not show a significant increase or decrease in activity during the pre-C2 period, 16 (62%) neurons showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in activity during the pre-C2 period, and no neuron showed a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in activity during the pre-C2 period.
Object-nonselective delay-period activity
Sixty-one neurons exhibited object-nonselective delay-period activity during the D1 and/or D2 periods. Of these, 38 neurons (63%) exhibited this activity during both the D1 and D2 periods. Three neurons (5%) showed object-nonselective delay-period activity during the D1 period but did not show delay-period activity during the D2 period. Twenty neurons (33%) showed object-nonselective delay-period activity during the D2 period but did not show delay-period activity during the D1 period.
Target- and/or color-selective response during color cue period
During the color cue period, 139 neurons exhibited a significantly larger response magnitude than the baseline response during the fixation period. Figure 17A shows the histograms of the responses of a neuron that depended on both the color cue and the target object. The neuron was activated during the color cue period when the color cue was green and the target object was the circle. However, when the target object was the double cone or cross and the color cue was green, this neuron showed a small response magnitude; therefore the neuron was not simply responding on the basis of color information. When the color cue was red, this neuron did not respond during the color cue period. The response magnitudes of this neuron were significantly different in terms of both the color factor [F(1,118) = 61.67, P < 0.0001] and the target factor [F(2,118) = 16.47, P < 0.0001]. Thus this response during the color cue period depended on both the color cue and target object, and we defined green as the preferred color of this neuron and the circle as the preferred target object of this neuron. These histograms showed that movements in all directions occurred. In addition, the monkey could not determine the direction of a movement until the response period. These findings indicate that this selective neuronal activity was not caused by the movements. This type of activity was classified as the CT response. Seventy neurons were identified as having the CT response in this study.
|
Figure 17C shows the histograms of the response of a neuron that depended on the target object. The neuron was activated when the target object was the circle and was not activated when the target object was the double cone or cross. The magnitudes of responses that depended on the color itself were not significantly different. The response magnitude was significantly different in terms of the target factor [F(2,76) = 14.37, P < 0.0001] but not significant in terms of the color factor [F(1,76) = 0.05, P > 0.05]. Thus the response of this neuron during the color cue period depended on the target object not on the color. This type of response was classified as the T response, and we defined the circle stimulus as the preferred target object of this neuron. Fifteen neurons were identified as having the T response in this study.
Response during color cue period in error trials
To evaluate the importance of the CT, T, and C responses during the color cue period in memory retrieval, we examined neuronal activity when the monkeys performed incorrectly. The magnitudes of the CT responses (Fig. 18A) during the error trials were significantly smaller than those during the correct preferred-color and preferred-target trials (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, z = –4.72, P < 0.0001, mean = 42.86 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 34.60 spikes/s in error trials). Similarly, the magnitudes of the T responses (Fig. 18B) during the error trials were significantly smaller than those during the correct preferred-target trials (z = –2.78, P < 0.01, mean = 39.97 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 32.52 spikes/s in error trials). In contrast, the magnitudes of the C responses (Fig. 18C) were not significantly different between the correct and error preferred-color trials (z = –0.74, P > 0.05, mean = 39.33 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 38.43 spikes/s in error trials).
|
Latencies were slightly different among the CT, C, and T responses. Figure 19 shows the cumulative summation of the latencies of the CT, C, and T responses that were <200 ms. The latencies of the T responses (mean = 137 ms) were slightly longer than those of the CT (mean = 127 ms) and C responses (mean = 121 ms), but these differences were not statistically significant [F(2,78) = 0.98, P > 0.05].
|
When selection is not required, do neurons with the CT response or T response also respond to color stimuli? To answer this question, we examined neuronal activity during a fixation task. While the monkey maintained its fixation, we presented the same color stimulus as that used in the SPR task. Figure 20A shows the histograms of the CT response during the SPR task and the fixation task. The response magnitude during the fixation task (61.00 ± 29.65 spikes/s) was similar to that during the preferred-color and preferred-target trials of the SPR task (46.82 ± 17.01 spikes/s). Differences between these response magnitudes were not significant (Mann-Whitney U test, z = 1.46, P > 0.05). Thus the object-selectivity in this CT response was elicited by the suppression of response in the preferred-color and the nonpreferred-target trials. In all the tested neurons, the magnitudes of their CT responses (n = 17) during the preferred-color and preferred-target trials of the SPR task were not significantly (P > 0.05) different from those during the fixation task (Fig. 20B). The population activity of the CT responses also exhibited similar patterns during the preferred-color and preferred-target trials in the SPR task to those during the preferred-color trial in the fixation task (Fig. 20C).
|
Relationship between neuronal activities during color cue period and C1/C2 periods and D1/D2 periods
Of 139 neurons with a response during the color cue period, 45 neurons (CT responses, n = 24; C responses, n = 16; T responses, n = 5) showed an object-selective response during the C1 and/or C2 period (Table 2). We compared the object preference between the color cue period and the object cue period of the CT and T neurons. About one-third of the neurons (CT neurons, n = 8; T neurons, n = 1) showed the same object-preference during the color cue period and object cue period (Table 2). Figure 21A shows an example of responses of a neuron with the same preference during the color cue period and object cue period. This neuron responded to the circle stimulus during the C1 and C2 periods and also responded when the color cue was red and the target object was the circle during the color cue period. In contrast, the remaining two-thirds of neurons (CT neurons, n = 16; T neurons, n = 4) did not show the same object preference. Figure 21B shows an example of responses of a neuron with the different preference during the color cue period and object cue period. The preferred object of this neuron was the circle during the C1 and C2 periods and the double cone during the color cue period. Indeed, the object selectivity was not clear in the population activity. We constructed the histograms of the population activities of the neurons with CT response that preferred red (Fig. 21C, left) and those that preferred green (Fig. 21C, right). We also constructed the histograms of the population activities of the neurons with T response when the color cues were red (Fig. 21D, left) and green (Fig. 21D, right). The left histograms show that the preferred target object was presented during the C1 period and the right histograms show that the preferred target object was presented during the C2 period. The fact that the population activities during the C1 period and C2 period were not different between the presentations of preferred target objects (black line) and nonpreferred target objects (gray line) implies that the object selectivity of the CT or T neurons could not be derived from the activities during the cue period.
|
|
Target- and/or color-selective delay-period activity during D3 period
During the D3 period, 260 neurons exhibited a significantly higher delay-period activity than the baseline activity during the fixation period. Similar to the response during the color cue period, we could detect CT, C, and T delay-period activities during the D3 period. Figure 22A shows the histograms of the activities of a neuron that depended on both the color cue and the target object. The neuron was activated during the D3 period when the color cue was green and the target object was the double cone. However, when the target object was the cross or circle and the color cue was green, this neuron did not show a significant delay-period activity. When the color cue was red, this neuron did not show the activity during the D3 period. The response magnitude of this neuron was significantly different in terms of both the color factor [F(1,144) = 31.07, P < 0.0001] and the target factor [F(2,144) = 18.88, P < 0.0001]. Thus this activity during the D3 period depended on both the color cue and target object. This type of activity was classified as CT delay-period activity. One hundred two neurons were identified as having CT delay-period activity in this study.
|
Figure 22C shows the histograms of activities of a neuron that depended on the target object. The neuron was activated when the target object was the circle and was not activated when the target object was the double cone or cross. These activities that depended on the color itself were not significantly different. The response magnitudes were significantly different in terms of the target factor [F(2,139) = 20.22, P < 0.0001] but not significant in terms of the color factor [F(1,139) = 2.43, P > 0.05]. Thus the delay-period activity of this neuron during the D3 period depended on the target object but not on the color. This type of delay-period activity was classified as T delay-period activity. Thirty-eight neurons were identified as having T delay-period activity in this study.
Response during D3 period in error trials
During the D3 period, the CT delay-period activities (Fig. 23A) during the error trials were significantly weaker than those during the correct preferred-color and preferred-target trials (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, z = –4.07, P < 0.0001, mean = 25.30 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 21.99 spikes/s in error trials). Similarly, the T delay-period activities (Fig. 23B) during the error trials were significantly weaker than those during the correct preferred-target trials (z = –2.14, P < 0.05, mean = 22.81 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 20.14 spikes/s in error trials). In contrast, neurons with C delay-period activity (Fig. 23C) did not show a significantly different response magnitude between the correct and error preferred-color trials (z = –1.63, P > 0.05, mean = 19.61 spikes/s in correct trials, mean = 19.01 spikes/s in error trials).
|
Of 139 neurons with response during the color cue period, 51 neurons (CT response, n = 36; C response, n = 9; T response, n = 6) also showed delay-period activity during the D3 period. Of 36 neurons with the CT response during the color cue period, 23 neurons exhibited CT delay-period activity, 8 neurons exhibited C delay-period activity, and 5 neurons exhibited T delay-period activity during the D3 period. Of nine neurons with the C response during the color cue period, five neurons showed CT delay-period activity, four neurons showed C delay-period activity, and no neurons showed T delay-period activity during the D3 period. Of six neurons with the T response during the color cue period, two neurons showed CT delay-period activity, four neurons showed T delay-period activity, and no neurons showed C delay-period activity during the D3 period (Table 2).
Recording sites
All neurons with the object-selective response during the C1 and/or C2 period were recorded from the VLPFC (Fig. 24A; Table 3). We could not find a difference between the distributions of neurons with the order-nonselective response and those with the order-selective response (Fig. 24A). In the neurons with object-nonselective response during the C1 and/or C2 period, all neurons were recorded from the VLPFC, except for one neuron that was recorded from the DLPFC (Fig. 24B; Table 3). We could not find a difference in the distribution between neurons with the order-nonselective response and those with the order-selective response (Fig. 24B).
|
|
The neurons with a response during the color cue period were recorded from both the DLPFC and the VLPFC (Fig. 25A; Table 3). Although the proportions of neurons with CT, C, and T responses among neurons activated during the color cue period in the DLPFC were not different from those in the VLPFC, the proportion of neurons activated during the color cue period was much smaller in the DLPFC (10%). Thus the neurons activated during the color cue period were mainly located in the VLPFC (90%). In addition, the response latencies of all DLPFC neurons were >200 ms (mean = 289 ms). In contrast, the response latencies of most of the VLPFC neurons (80%) were <200 ms (mean = 163 ms) as observed in Fig. 25B. This difference was statistically significant (z = 4.62, P < 0.0001).
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Coding object and temporal order of object presentation during cue period
Seventy-three percent of neurons with the object-selective response and 55% of neurons with the object-nonselective response showed the order-selective response. In these neurons, although the visual stimulus was physically identical, response magnitudes during the C1 and C2 periods were significantly different.
The modulation of the visual response of prefrontal neurons has been described in many previous reports (Asaad et al. 2000; Everling et al. 2002; Funahashi et al. 1990; Hasegawa et al. 2000; Iba and Sawaguchi 2002; Kobayashi et al. 2002; Mikami et al. 1982; Rainer et al. 1998b; Sakagami and Niki 1994a,b; Sakagami and Tsutsui 1999; Sakagami et al. 2001; Watanabe 1981, 1986, 1990, 1992). Previous results and these results confirmed that not only the physical property but also the behavioral significance of a sensory stimulus is a factor critical to the activation of prefrontal neurons.
How are the object- and order-selective responses elicited? One possible mechanism may be that neurons with the object- and order-selective visual responses receive the object information and the order information separately and integrates them. However, our data do not support this mechanism. Latencies were not different among these responses. In addition, in some neurons the C2-dominant response during the C2 period depended on the cue object presented during the C1 period. Furthermore, we could not find the object-nonselective C2-dominant response. These findings suggest that neurons with the object- and order-selective responses are not receiving object information and order information separately. That is, our monkeys may be processing order information individually for each object and in parallel with order-nonselective object information.
When response magnitudes during the C1 and C2 periods were significantly different, the response was regarded as order-selective. This difference could be caused by the enhancement or suppression of sensory responses during the C1 or C2 period. To test this hypothesis, we compared responses during the SPR task and the DMS task. In 75% of neurons with the C1-dominant response, the response magnitude during the C1 period was similar to that during the cue period of the DMS task, and the response magnitude during the C2 period was significantly smaller than that during the cue period of the DMS task. This result suggests that the C1-dominant response must be elicited by the suppression of sensory responses during the C2 period. Thus the C1-dominant response was actually generated by the same sensory input as in the order-nonselective response, but suppressed during the C2 period. That is, the C1-dominant response may be considered as a C2-dominant suppression rather than a C1-dominant activation. On the other hand, in about two-thirds of neurons with the C2-dominant response, the response magnitude during the C1 period was similar to that during the cue period of the DMS task, and the response magnitude during the C2 period was significantly larger than that during the cue period of the DMS task. In one-third of neurons with the C2-dominant response, the response magnitude during the C1 period was significantly smaller than that during the cue period of the DMS task, and the response magnitude during the C2 period was similar to that during the cue period of the DMS task. Thus the C2-dominant response was based on either C2-dominant enhancement or C1-dominant suppression.
To generate the object- and order-selective responses during the C2 period, object-selective delay-period activity during the D1 period could contribute by enhancing or suppressing the response during the C2 period. In fact, just before the C2 presentation during the last phase of the D1 period, population activity was slightly higher in the trials when the preferred object was presented during the C2 period than in the trials when the nonpreferred object was presented during the C2 period (Fig. 4A) or the preferred object was presented during the C1 period (Fig. 16F).
The object-selective and C2-dominant response magnitudes in the error trials were significantly smaller than those in the correct trials. This finding will support the behavioral significance of the C2-dominant response in the performance of the SPR task. The order-nonselective and C1-dominant response magnitudes during the C1 period were not significantly different in the error trials. One possible interpretation of these results may be that these neurons have no significant roles in the performance of the SPR task. However, because we defined error trials as those in which the monkeys made wrong choices at the end of trials, most of the errors of this complex task may be caused by activity during the later periods of the task rather than firing rate at the beginning of each trial.
Recently, Ninokura et al. (2004) have examined prefrontal neuronal activity while monkeys performed a task in which the monkey had to memorize three objects and their order of presentation. They found visual responses that depended on the object, order, or both object and order. Although this result is similar to our result, there are differences. One major difference is the distribution of neurons with object-nonselective and order-selective responses. We recorded almost all neurons with this type of response from the VLPFC, but Ninokura et al. recorded such neurons from the DLPFC and not from the VLPFC. Although both of these tasks look similar in terms of visual objects and their sequence, the nature of memory may be different. In Ninokura's task, monkeys were required to do the sequential action toward the stimuli in the same sequence presented during the cue periods. In contrast, our monkeys were required to select one object at the time of color stimulus and that selected object became the target of action. Before this epoch our monkey did not know what the target of action would be. Thus in the task of Ninokura et al., memory of objects and their order contained motor aspect or preparation of action. In contrast, in our task, memory of objects and their order did not contain motor aspect before the presentation of color cue. This difference may explain why Ninokura et al. found object-nonselective and order-selective response in the DLPFC. Recently, Hasegawa et al. (2004) found neuronal activity that was modulated according to the step of a self-ordered task from the DLPFC; this result indicates that the DLPFC could contribute to the processing of order information of action.
Ninokura et al. recorded object-nonselective and order-selective response to the first, second, and third cues. In contrast, we recorded object-nonselective and order-selective responses to the first cue, not to the second cue. These differences could be caused by the difference in the number of memorized objects. In our SPR task, monkeys had to memorize two objects and the order of its presentation. To recognize whether a cue is the first or second cue, monkeys could pay attention to the presence of the first cue. If not, the cue is the first one, and if yes, the cue is the second one. However, this simple strategy might not be sufficient for performing the task used by Ninokura et al., because there were three memorized objects. To recognize whether a cue is the first cue, second cue, or third cue, a more complex neuronal mechanism may be necessary.
Order-selective delay-period activities
In 67% of neurons with object-selective delay-period activity, delay-period activity depended on both the object and temporal order of its presentation (C1-coding and C2-coding delay-period activities). Most neurons (90%) with order-selective delay-period activity did not exhibit object-selective delay-period activity during the DMS task. In addition, neurons with order-selective delay-period activity showed decreased discharge rates during the delay period of the error trials. These results suggest that neurons with order-selective delay-period activity specialized to participate in the storing of information regarding both the object and the temporal order of its presentation during the SPR task.
Previous studies showed that some delay-period activities depended on both the cue and its order of presentation. Barone and Joseph (1989) recorded prefrontal neuronal activity while a monkey performed a delayed-response task in which the monkey was required to retain information regarding three target positions and the temporal order of presentation and to respond by performing sequential saccades and hand-reaching movements toward the targets in the same temporal order. They found that one class of neurons exhibited tonic activity with spatial and temporal selectivity, such that tonic activity was observed only when the first visual cue was presented at one particular position out of three. Funahashi et al. (1997) recorded prefrontal neuronal activity while a monkey performed a delayed sequential reaching task, in which the monkey is required to retain information on two of three target positions and the temporal order of presentation, and to respond by performing hand-reaching movements toward the targets in the same temporal order. They found position-dependent activity elicited when a cue was presented at a particular position in a particular temporal order. Ninokura et al. (2003) found that 43% of neurons with delay-period activity was selective for the sequence in which visual objects were presented during the cue period. Previous studies (Barone and Joseph 1989; Funahashi et al. 1997; Ninokura et al. 2003) showed the presence of delay-period activities coding both the item (spatial position or object) and the order of presentation. Our data are comparable to those of previous studies in a sense that we found object- and order-selective delay-period activities in the prefrontal cortex. The previous results suggest that the lateral prefrontal cortex contributes to the memorization of the temporal order, and our results suggest that the VLPFC participates in retaining not only object information but also temporal information.
However, our results are different from previous results in several points, and we believe that these differences provide us useful knowledge about the functions of the prefrontal cortex. In this study, we could not find delay-period activity that was elicited in only one of six sequences. In previous studies (Funahashi et al. 1997; Ninokura et al. 2003), some neurons were activated during the delay period in only one sequence. In these previous experiments, the monkeys memorized multiple spatial locations or objects and the order of their presentation, and during the response period, the monkeys had to respond sequentially for each spatial location or object in the same order of presentation. To execute a sequential response on the basis of the memorized items presented sequentially, the existence of delay-period activity specific for one sequence may have an advantage. In contrast, in our SPR task, the monkeys had to memorize the first and second cue objects and retrieved one object on the basis of the color cue. The monkeys selected one of three objects at the time of color cue appearance. They do not need to memorize each combination separately, because they were not required to repeat that sequence afterward. During the color cue period, the existence of delay-period activity that depended on the specific sequence of cue presentation has no advantage. This could be the reason why we did not detect delay-period activity that was elicited in only one of six sequences.
Order-nonselective delay-period activity
Thirty-three percent of neurons with object-selective delay-period activity did not exhibit dependence on the temporal order of cue presentation (order-nonselective delay-period activity). In these neurons, delay-period activity followed the presentation of the preferred object and continued until the presentation of the next object cue or the color cue.
In these neurons, delay-period activity during the correct trials was not significantly different from that during the error trials in the SPR task. In most of the neurons (95%) with the order-nonselective delay-period activity, object-selective delay-period activity was also found during the DMS task. In addition, during the DMS task, these delay-period activities significantly decreased during the error trials. Thus order-nonselective delay-period activity may participate in the mnemonic process in the DMS task.
Order-nonselective delay-period activity ended when an intervening stimulus was presented. This is inconsistent with previous results (di Pellegrino and Wise 1993; Miller et al. 1996), in which the delay-period activity of the prefrontal cortex was maintained throughout the trial even when other intervening stimuli were presented during the delay. These differences could be caused by the nature of the intervening stimulus. In previous studies (di Pellegrino and Wise 1993; Miller et al. 1996), the intervening stimuli were distractors, so the monkey neglected the intervening stimuli. On the other hand, in our study, the monkey had to recognize and memorize the visual stimulus during the C2 period. These differences could account for the difference in delay-period activity between our present and previous studies.
Neuronal response related to retrieval of remembered object
Two-thirds of the neurons with a response during the color cue period showed target object selectivity (CT and T responses), although the target object was not presented during this period. These CT and T responses could play a critical role in the retrieval of an item among items in the working memory.
The LPFC participates in selecting a relevant target among several distractors (Hasegawa et al. 2000; Iba and Sawaguchi 2002) and in selecting the forthcoming movement (Hasegawa et al. 1998; Hoshi and Tanji 2004; Hoshi et al. 2000; Kim and Shadlen 1999; Sakagami and Niki 1994a,b; Sakagami and Tsutsui 1999; Sakagami et al. 2001; Watanabe 1986). The results of these experiments confirmed the importance of the active maintenance of information for the subsequent use and response selection or decision-making. In these experiments, however, either a target was selected before it was memorized or a target was selected among the visible objects. Here in our task, when the monkey attempted to select a target during the color cue presentation, the objects were not visible and the monkey was required to retrieve memorized objects from the working memory. This is actually one of the typical processes of the working memory that we usually encounter in our daily life. In this study, the VLPFC neurons showed responses that depended on the target object retrieved from the working memory (CT and T responses). In addition, the neurons with CT and T responses showed lower activities during the error trials than those during the correct trials. These neurons can participate in the retrieval of a target object from two objects in the working memory. In contrast, the C response showed color selectivity but not target object selectivity. The neurons with the C response showed a similar activity during the correct and error trials. These results suggest that the C response is not affected by the retrieval of the target object.
In the DLPFC, we could detect the neurons with a response to the color cue. However, the number of neurons was small, and the response latencies of these neurons were >200 ms. These results suggest that the DLPFC could not contribute to the retrieval process. The proportions of neurons with the CT, C, and T responses in the DLPFC were not significantly different from those in the VLPFC. The DLPFC receives input from the VLPFC (Barbas and Pandya 1989). These anatomical data suggest that neurons with the CT, C, and T responses in the DLPFC receive information from neurons with the CT, C, and T responses in the VLPFC.
Neuronal response related to mnemonic process of retrieved object
During the D3 period, we found the delay-period activities with CT, C, or T properties (CT, C, and T delay-period activities). During this period, monkeys had to memorize the target object retrieved during the color cue period. Because CT and T delay-period activities depended on the target object retrieved during the color cue period, and the neurons with the CT and T delay-period activities showed lower activities during the error trials than those during the correct trials, these neurons may participate in the mnemonic processing of the target object retrieved during the color cue period.
Although, monkeys did not have to memorize the color in our task, some neurons showed C delay-period activity during the D3 period. This delay-period activity is not necessary for performing the SPR task, and the functional role of this C delay-period activity is unclear. Similar delay-period activities were recorded from the lateral prefrontal cortex in previous studies (Funahashi et al. 1993b; Takeda and Funahashi 2002). In these studies, monkeys had to perform a memory-guided saccade to the opposite direction of the visual cue (Funahashi et al. 1993b) or 90° clockwise direction from the cue direction (Takeda and Funahashi 2002). Although monkeys had to memorized target direction but not had to memorize the cue location during the delay period, the directional delay-period activity of about two-thirds of neurons depended on the cue location.
Contribution of the VLPFC in SPR tasks
In this study, we found the object-selective response during the C1 and/or C2 period and delay-period activity during the D1 and/or D2 period in the VLPFC, not in the DLPFC. This suggests that the VLPFC contributes to the memorization of object information during the delay period. This is supported by previous anatomical, neuropsychological, and neurophysiological data. The DLPFC receives projections from the inferior parietal association cortex (Andersen et al. 1985; Barbas and Mesulam 1985; Cavada and Goldman-Rakic 1989; Petrides and Pandya 1984), which is involved in visuospatial processing (Barash et al. 1991a,b; Chafee and Goldman-Rakic 1998; Snyder et al. 1997). In contrast, the VLPFC receives dense projections from the inferotemporal association cortex (Barbas 1988; Seltzer and Pandya 1989; Ungerleider et al. 1989; Webster et al. 1994), which is involved in the representation of visual objects (Bruce et al. 1981; Desimone et al. 1984; Fuster 1990; Fuster and Jervey 1981; Miller et al. 1991, 1993; Perret et al. 1982). Lesions of the DLPFC, and more specifically those restricted to the principal sulcus or the middle third of its sulcus, produce a deficit in the performance of spatial delayed-response and spatial delayed-alternation tasks (Butters and Pandya 1969; Butters et al. 1971, 1972; Funahashi et al. 1993a; Mishkin 1957). Lesions of the VLPFC cause impairments in the performance of tasks based on the identity or features of object rather than spatial location. This impairment is observed in a delayed object alternation task (Mishkin and Manning 1978) and object/color delayed-matching or nonmatching-to-sample tasks (Iversen and Mishkin 1970; Kowalska et al. 1991; Mishkin and Manning 1978; Passingham 1975). In neurophysiological studies, it appears that neurons tuned specifically to the identity or features of an object are much fewer in the DLPFC than in the VLPFC (Fuster et al. 1982; O'Scalaidhe et al. 1997, 1999; Wallis and Miller 2003; Wilson et al. 1993). These previous results and our present results suggest that the VLPFC plays an important role in encoding and retaining information regarding the features of an object. In contrast, the contribution of the DLPFC to the encoding and retaining information regarding the feature of an object is small.
Neurons with the CT, C, and T response during the color cue period were recorded from both the DLPFC and VLPFC. However, larger population of these neurons was recorded from the VLPFC. In addition, the response latencies were shorter in the VLPFC. These results indicate that the neurons in the VLPFC were activated earlier than those in the DLPFC. A similar temporal difference in response between the DLPFC and VLPFC was found in human event-related functional MRI (fMRI) studies (Leung et al. 2000; Wagner et al. 2001) and a monkey neurophysiological study (Hoshi and Tanji 2004). These results suggest the greater contribution of the VLPFC in the retrieval of an object from multiple objects in the working memory. This is supported by human neuroimaging data. Human fMRI and PET studies showed that increases in activity are observed in the mid-VLPFC when human subjects retrieve one of the spatial and nonspatial aspects of an encoded stimulus on the basis of the color stimulus (Cadoret et al. 2001; Kostopoulos and Petrides 2003).
Neurons with delay-period activity during the D3 period were also recorded from both the DLPFC and VLPFC. However, large proportion of these neurons was recorded from the VLPFC. These results suggest the greater contribution of the VLPFC in the memorization of a target object. On the other hand, the fact that a small number of delay-period activities in the DLPFC was target object-selective and/or color-selective suggest some contribution of the DLPFC when the monkeys had to memorize what to respond.
Our results suggest the contribution of the VLPFC in performing this SPR task. However, some other cortical regions also could contribute to the performance of the SPR task. One possible cortical region is the inferotemporal cortex (IT). The IT is connected with the VLPFC (Barbas 1988; Seltzer and Pandya 1989; Ungerleider et al. 1989; Webster et al. 1994) and is involved in the representation of visual objects (Bruce et al. 1981; Desimone et al. 1984; Fuster 1990; Fuster and Jervey 1981; Miller et al. 1991, 1993; Perret et al. 1982). Many studies showed that IT neurons exhibited selective delay-period activity during the performance of a visual short-term memory task (Fuster 1990; Fuster and Jervey 1981, 1982; Mikami and Kubota 1980; Miller et al. 1993; Miyashita and Chang 1988). In addition, the contextual modulation of a visual response in the IT has been reported (Eskandar et al. 1992; Miller et al. 1993; Mikami and Kubota 1980). These results suggest that the IT could contribute to the encoding, mnemonic and retrieval processes of the SPR task. However, because the difference in the roles between the VLPFC and the IT is unclear, further experiments that compare neuronal activity in the IT with that in the VLPFC are necessary.
Information flow in the SPR task
Information flows proposed on the basis of our results are shown schematically in Fig. 26. We draw this schema based on the following hypotheses. At first, when a single neuron responds during the adjacent periods and maintains its response properties during these periods, the neuron carries the information from the first period to the second period; e.g., continuous activation from the cue period to the delay period. Second, when two neurons activated during adjacent periods share the same kind of response properties, and the timing of the activation-end of neuron 1 response and the timing of the activation-start of neuron 2 activation were synchronized, neuron 1 can send the information to neuron 2.
|
Activity during the D1 period actually started during the C1 period. The object information travels from the neurons with the order-nonselective visual response to the neurons with either the order-nonselective delay-period activity or the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity. This information flow was suggested by the following results. Among neurons with the order-nonselective object-selective response during the C1 period, 36% (8/22) also exhibited the object-selective delay-period activity. The delay-period activities of these neurons was either the order-nonselective or C1-coding (D1) activity (Table 1). At the population level, neurons with the order-nonselective visual response exhibited the object-selective delay-period activity (Fig. 16B).
Neurons with the C1-dominant response showed the object-selective response during the C1 period but they were not activated during the delay period (Fig. 16D). This result suggests that neurons with the C1-dominant response could not code visual information during the delay period. However, because the object-selective properties of the C1-dominant response are similar to those of the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity, and the end of the C1-dominant response synchronized with the start of the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity, the C1-dominant response may contribute to generating the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity. In addition, when the C1 object was presented, the difference between the preferred-object trials and nonpreferred-object trials was detected earlier for the order-nonselective delay-period activity than for C1-coding (D1) activity (Fig. 13E). This result suggests that the C1 object information encoded by the neurons with the order-nonselective delay-period activity is conveyed to the neurons with the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity.
During the C2 period, the VLPFC receives object information from the visual association cortex, probably from the IT. It also elicits the order-nonselective and the C2-dominant responses. As described already, to generate the C2-dominant responses during the C2 period, object-selective delay-period activity during the D1 period could contribute by enhancing the response during the C2 period.
Activity during the D2 period actually starts during the C2 period. The individual neurons with order-nonselective visual response do not share the same object preference during the D2 period at the population level as seen in Fig. 16B. At the same time, the individual neurons with order-nonselective delay-period activity during the D2 period do not share the same object preference with the phasic component of activity during the C2 period at the population level as seen in Fig. 13A. These results suggest that individual neurons cannot participate in transmitting the C2 object information from the C2 period to the D2 period. However, different neurons can contribute to transmission of this information. Neurons with order-nonselective visual response can send C2 object information to neurons with the order-nonselective delay-period activity during the D2 period. This is because both neurons share the same properties.
Neurons with the C2-dominant response showed activity during the D2 period at the population level (Fig. 16F). However, the object preferences of these neurons were also different between the cue period and the delay period at the individual neuron level (Table 1) and at the population level (Figs. 16F and 13D). Thus these neurons cannot transfer object-selective information by themselves from the cue period to the delay period. Instead, neurons with the C2-dominant response probably transfer object-selective information to neurons with the C2-coding delay-period activity, because both types of neurons shared the same type of selectivity and the activation-end and -start were synchronized.
Neurons with order-nonselective delay-period activity during the D2 period can also send information to neurons with C2-coding delay-period activity. This can be seen in the population activity related to C2-object information which starts earlier in order-nonselective neurons than in C2-coding neurons (Fig. 13E).
As seen in Fig. 13E, when the C2 object was presented, the C1-object-selective activity of order-nonselective neurons ended first, and the activity of C1-coding (D1) neurons ended. This was synchronized with the start of the activation in C1-coding (D2) neurons. These results suggest that the C1 object information is conveyed from the C1-coding (D1) neuron to the C1-coding (D2) neuron during the C2 period.
During the color cue period, the neurons with the CT response received color information because these neurons were activated by color stimuli during the fixation task. This result also suggests that the target selectivity of the CT response is achieved by suppressing the visual response to a color cue when the nonpreferred object was selected from the working memory. On the other hand, neurons with the T response did not respond to color stimuli during the fixation task. This result indicates that neurons with the T response do not receive color information. Although some of the neurons with CT and T responses showed the object-selective response during the C1 and/or C2 period, their object selectivity was often different from that during the color cue period. Thus the individual neuron may have multiple functions. For instance, it could code object A during the C1 and/or C2 period and code object B during the color cue period. Some neurons with the CT response were also activated during the delay period. Those delay-period activities also differed from the typical delay-period activity. In these neurons, the delay-period activity was observed only near the end of D2 period. The neurons with the T response were not activated during the D1 and D2 periods. This observation suggests that the neurons with T response are a different class of neuron. At the end of the delay period, the neurons with the CT response whose preferred color was red exhibited C1-coding delay-period activity; the neurons with the CT response whose preferred color was green exhibited C2-coding delay-period activity.
These results suggest that the neurons with the C response and CT response receive color information from the visual association cortex, probably from the IT. At the same time, neurons with the CT response receive object and temporal order information from neurons with delay-period activity, combined color, and object information. This combined information is then integrated into object information in neurons with the T responses to perform the future saccade.
During the color cue period, color information and retrieved target object information were conveyed from neurons with the visual response to those with the D3 delay-period activity. During the D3 period, most of neurons with the CT response also exhibited the delay-period activity with the CT property, and several neurons with the CT response exhibited the delay-period activity with the C or T property. Neurons with the T response exhibited the delay-period activity with the CT or T property. Neurons with the C response exhibited the delay-period activity with the C or CT property. These results suggest that both color information and target information are conveyed from neurons with the CT response during the color cue period to neurons with D3 delay-period activity carrying the CT property. Color information was conveyed from neurons with the CT or C response to neurons with the D3 delay-period activity carrying the CT or C property, and target information was conveyed from neurons with the CT or T response to neurons with the D3 delay-period activity carrying the CT or T property.
Most of the object-selective, order-selective, and color-selective neurons during the C1, D1, C2, D2, color cue, or D3 periods were mainly recorded from the VLPFC. Also, the latencies of the response of the VLPFC neurons were shorter than those of the DLPFC neurons. This suggests that the object and order information of our task are processed mainly in the VLPFC. During the color cue period, the retrieval process of an object is also processed mainly in the VLPFC. In the DLPFC, neurons with CT, C, or T responses receive information from neurons with the CT, C, or T responses in the VLPFC. The DLPFC uses this information for future execution of behaviors, such as saccade.
Prefrontal cortex and working memory
Neuronal activity during the delay period has been examined repeatedly while monkeys performed various types of working memory task (Chafee and Goldman-Rakic 1998; Constantinidis et al. 2001; di Pellegrino and Wise 1991, 1993; Funahashi et al. 1989, 1993b; Fuster 1973; Fuster et al. 1982; Kubota and Niki 1971; Kubota et al. 1974; Miller et al. 1996; Niki 1974; Niki and Watanabe 1976; Rainer et al. 1998a; Rao et al. 1997; Sawaguchi and Yamane 1999; Takeda and Funahashi 2002; Watanabe 1981; Wilson et al. 1993). The sustained delay-period activity with directional preference or object preference has been considered to be a neuronal correlate of a mechanism that temporarily stores spatial or object information (Funahashi and Kubota 1994; Fuster 1997; Goldman-Rakic 1987).
Working memory involves both a short-term storage capacity for maintaining mental representation and a capacity for manipulating stored information (Baddeley 1986; Baddeley and Logie 1999). It has been suggested that the prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in working memory (Baddeley 1986; Funahashi and Kubota 1994; Fuster 1997; Goldman-Rakic 1987). This has been shown by both neurophysiological studies on monkey and neuroimaging studies on human. However, in most studies of monkeys, neuronal activities were examined during a delayed-response task or a delayed-matching-to-sample task, in which the monkey had to memorize single spatial or object information but did not have to manipulate stored information. In this study, monkeys had to memorize two objects and the order of their presentation and manipulate these pieces of information to select a target object. The order-selective delay-period activity found in this experiment was object- and order-selective as well as task period–specific. That is, most of the order-selective neurons were activated either during the D1 or D2 period but not both. These results suggest that prefrontal neurons operate in a way similar to the registers in the CPU of a microcomputer. Three major types of order-selective neurons [C1-coding (D1), C1-coding (D2), and C2-coding] are registers that perform the SPR task, and temporally stored information must be manipulated during the color cue presentation to select the correct target. Thus our results indicate that the prefrontal cortex participates in the manipulation and integration of stored information and suggest that the prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in working memory.
Our SPR task contains several components of the working memory process; the encoding and maintenance processes of objects and temporal order and retrieval processes from the working memory. During the C1 and C2 periods, the object information and temporal order information must be encoded in the working memory. During these periods, different groups of neurons were found to encode the presentation of objects to those presented without order. This was in addition to the object-nonselective response neurons. During the D1 and D2 periods, the object information and temporal order information must be maintained in the working memory. During these periods, there were neurons that memorized the ordered presentation of objects in addition to the nonselective delay-period activity. Although there were some overlaps, neurons in each epoch were specialized. Logically it is possible the same neuron is responsible for coding C1 object and memorizing it during the D1 and D2 periods until the color cue period. However, neurons in the VLPFC of our monkeys did not work this way. Instead, C1 object information seemed to travel from the C1-coding (D1) delay-period activity to the C1-coding (D2) delay-period activity. In other words, functional units in the monkey VLPFC seem fragmented and specialized. In addition, there were neurons with order-nonselective or object-nonselective activities. These neurons may contribute to the SPR task by carrying object information.
During the color cue period, an object must be retrieved from two objects in the working memory. During this period, there were neurons encoding color and/or object retrieval. During the D3 period, retrieved object information must be maintained in the working memory. There were neurons related to these processes. In addition there were neurons carrying color information during the D3 period, although the color information is not necessary during this period. The VLPFC is participating to perform the SPR task using the various types of neurons described above. However, the VLPFC may also prepare for unexpected situations by keeping some information in reserve even if it is not directly related to performing the current task.
Thus there were neurons corresponding to each process of the SPR task. In other words, each process could be defined as a group of neurons that exhibits a particular function. These functions include encoding, maintenance and retrieval processes of the working memory, although there were some overlapping functions. These results suggest that the working memory is clearly fractionated into a number of different aspects.
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Mikami, Dept. of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Primate Research Inst., Kyoto Univ., Kanrin, Inuyama, Aichi 484-8506, Japan (E-mail: mikami{at}pri.kyoto-u.ac.jp)
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Asaad WF, Rainer G, and Miller EK. Task-specific neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 84: 451–459, 2000.
Baddeley A. Working Memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford, 1986.
Baddeley A and Logie RH. Working memory: the multiple component model. In: Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control, edited by Miyake A and Shah P. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 28–61.
Barash S, Bracewell RM, Fogassi L, Gnadt JW, and Andersen RA. Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area I. Temporal properties; comparison with area 7a. J Neurophysiol 66: 1095–1108, 1991a.
Barash S, Bracewell RM, Fogassi L, Gnadt JW, and Andersen RA. Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area II. Spatial properties. J Neurophysiol 66: 1109–1124, 1991b.
Barbas H. Anatomic organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 276: 313–342, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Barbas H and Mesulam MM. Cortical afferent input to the principalis region of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience 15: 619–637, 1985.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Barbas H and Pandya DN. Architecture and intrinsic connections of the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 286: 353–375, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Barone P and Joseph JP. Prefrontal cortex and spatial sequencing in macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res 78: 447–464, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bruce CJ, Desimone R, and Gross CG. Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 46: 369–384, 1981.
Butters N and Pandya D. Retention of delayed-alternation: effect of selective lesions of sulcus principalis. Science 165: 1271–1273, 1969.
Butters N, Pandya D, Sanders K, and Dye P. Behavioral deficits in monkeys after selective lesions within the middle third of sulcus principalis. J Comp Physiol Psychol 76: 8–14, 1971.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Butters N, Pandya D, Stein D, and Rosen J. A search for the spatial engram within the frontal lobes of monkeys. Acta Neurobiol Exp 32: 305–329, 1972.[Medline]
Cadoret G, Pike GB, and Petrides M. Selective activation of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in the human brain during active retrieval processing. Eur J Neurosci 14: 1164–1170, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Cavada C and Goldman-Rakic PS. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey. II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol 287: 422–445, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Chafee MV and Goldman-Rakic PS. Matching patterns of activity in primate prefrontal area 8a and parietal area 7ip neurons during a spatial working memory task. J Neurophysiol 79: 2919–2940, 1998.
Chiba AA, Kesner RP, and Reynolds AM. Memory for spatial location as a function of temporal lag in rat: role of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex. Behav Neural Biol 61: 123–131, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Constantinidis C, Franowicz MN, and Goldman-Rakic PS. The sensory nature of mnemonic representation in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature Neurosci 4: 311–316, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross CG, and Bruce C. Stimulus selective properties of inferior temporal area TEO in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 4: 2051–2062, 1984.[Abstract]
di Pellegrino G and Wise SP. A neurophysiological comparison of three distinct regions of the primate frontal lobe. Brain 114: 951–978, 1991.
di Pellegrino G and Wise SP. Visuospatial versus visuomotor activity in the premotor and prefrontal cortex of a primate. J Neurosci 13: 1227–1243, 1993.[Abstract]
Eskandar EN, Richmond BJ, and Optican LM. Role of inferior temporal neurons in visual memory I. Temporal encoding of information about visual images, recalled images, and behavioral context. J Neurophysiol 68: 1277–1295, 1992.
Everling S, Tinsley CJ, Gaffan D, and Duncan J. Filtering of neural signals by focused attention in the monkey prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 5: 671–676, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Funahashi S, Bruce CJ, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 61: 331–349, 1989.
Funahashi S, Bruce CJ, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Visuospatial coding in primate prefrontal neurons revealed by oculomotor paradigms. J Neurophysiol 63: 814–831, 1990.
Funahashi S, Bruce CJ, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Dorsolateral prefrontal lesions and oculomotor delayed-response performance: evidence for mnemonic "scotomas". J Neurosci 13: 1479–1497, 1993a.[Abstract]
Funahashi S, Chafee MV, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Prefrontal neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing a delayed anti-saccade task. Nature 365: 753–756, 1993b.[CrossRef][Medline]
Funahashi S, Inoue M, and Kubota K. Delay-period activity in the primate prefrontal cortex encoding multiple spatial positions and their order of presentation. Behav Brain Res 84: 203–223, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Funahashi S and Inoue M. Neuronal interactions related to working memory processes in the primate prefrontal cortex revealed by cross-correlation analysis. Cereb Cortex 10: 535–551, 2000.
Funahashi S and Kubota K. Working memory and prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Res 21: 1–11, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fuster JM. Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory. J Neurophysiol 36: 61–78, 1973.
Fuster JM. Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory. J Neurophysiol 64: 681–697, 1990.
Fuster JM. The Prefrontal Cortex. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1997.
Fuster JM, Bauer RH, and Jervey JP. Cellular discharge in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the monkey in cognitive tasks. Exp Neurol 77: 679–694, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Fuster JM and Jervey JP. Inferotemporal neurons distinguish and retain behaviorally relevant features of visual stimuli. Science 212: 952–955, 1981.
Fuster JM and Jervey JP. Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J Neurosci 2: 361–371, 1982.[Abstract]
Goldman-Rakic PS. Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Higher Functions of the Brain. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1987, sect. 1, vol. 5, part 1, p. 374–417.
Hasegawa R, Sawaguchi T, and Kubota K. Monkey prefrontal neuronal activity coding the forthcoming saccade in an oculomotor delayed matching-to sample task. J Neurophysiol 79: 322–333, 1998.
Hasegawa RP, Blitz AM, and Goldberg ME. Neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex whose activity tracks the progress of a three-step self-ordered task. J Neurophysiol 92: 1524–1535, 2004.
Hasegawa RP, Matsumoto M, and Mikami A. Search target selection in monkey prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 84: 1692–1696, 2000.
Hoshi E, Shima K, and Tanji J. Neuronal activity in the primate prefrontal cortex in the process of motor selection based on two behavioral rules. J Neurophysiol 83: 2355–2373, 2000.
Hoshi E and Tanji J. Area-selective neuronal activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for information retrieval and action planning. J Neurophysiol 91: 2707–2722, 2004.
Iba M and Sawaguchi T. Neuronal activity representing visuospatial mnemonic processes associated with target selection in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Res 43: 9–22, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Inoue M and Mikami A. Ventrolateral prefrontal neuronal activity related to hold the information of object to respond. Neurosci Res 26: 201, 2001.[CrossRef]
Inoue M and Mikami A. Prefrontal neuronal activity related to both color and the selected object. Jpn J Physiol 52: 165, 2002a.
Inoue M and Mikami A. Delay period activity of the primate prefrontal cortex during the serial probe reproduction task. Soc Neurosci Abstr 28: 676.13, 2002b.
Inoue M and Mikami A. Prefrontal cortex contributes selection of an object from memorized objects. Neurosci Res 46: 18, 2003.
Iversen SD and Mishkin M. Preservation interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Exp Brain Res 11: 376–386, 1970.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kesner RP and Holdbrook T. Dissociation of item and order spatial memory in rats following medial prefrontal cortex lesions. Neuropsychologia 25: 653–664, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kesner RP, Hopkins RO, and Fineman B. Item and order dissociation in humans with prefrontal cortex damage. Neuropsychologia 32: 881–891, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kim JM and Shadlen MN. Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nat Neurosci 2: 176–185, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kobayashi S, Lauwereyns J, Koizumi M, Sakagami M, and Hikosaka O. Influence of reward expectation on visuospatial processing in macaque lateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 87: 1488–1498, 2002.
Kostopoulos P and Petrides M. The mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: insight into its role in memory retrieval. Eur J Neurosci 17: 1489–1497, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kowalska DM, Bachevalier J, and Mishkin M. The role of the inferior prefrontal convexity in performance of delayed non-matching-to-sample. Neuropsychologia 29: 583–600, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kubota K, Iwamoto T, and Suzuki H. Visuokinetic activities of primate prefrontal neurons during delayed-response performance. J Neurophysiol 37: 1197–1212, 1974.
Kubota K and Niki H. Prefrontal cortical activity and delayed alternation performance in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 34: 337–347, 1971.
Leung HC, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Peterson BS, and Gore JC. An event-related functional MRI study of the Stroop color word interference task. Cereb Cortex 10: 552–560, 2000.
McAndrew MP and Milner B. The frontal cortex and memory for temporal order. Neuropsychologia 29: 849–859, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mikami A, Ito S, and Kubota K. Modifications of neuron activities of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during extrafoveal attention. Behav Brain Res 5: 219–233, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mikami A and Kubota K. Inferotemporal neuron activity and color discrimination with delay. Brain Res 182: 65–78, 1980.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Miller EK, Erickson CA, and Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J Neurosci 16: 5154–5167, 1996.
Miller EK, Li L, and Desimone R. A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory. Science 254: 1377–1379, 1991.
Miller EK, Li L, and Desimone R. Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task. J Neurosci 13: 1460–1478, 1993.[Abstract]
Milner B. Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 27: 272–277, 1971.
Milner B, Corsi P, and Leonard G. Frontal-lobe contribution to recency judgments. Neuropsychologia 29: 601–618, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mishkin M. Effect of small frontal lesions on delayed alternation in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 20: 615–622, 1957.
Mishkin M and Manning FJ. Non-spatial memory after selective prefrontal lesions in monkeys. Brain Res 143: 313–323, 1978.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Miyashita Y and Chang HS. Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortex. Nature 331: 68–70, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niki H. Differential activity of prefrontal units during right and left delayed response trials. Brain Res 70: 346–349, 1974.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Niki H and Watanabe M. Prefrontal unit activity and delayed response: relation to cue location versus direction of response. Brain Res 105: 79–88, 1976.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ninokura Y, Mushiake H, and Tanji J. Representation of the temporal order of visual objects in the primate lateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 89: 2868–2873, 2003.
Ninokura Y, Mushiake H, and Tanji J. Integration of temporal order and object information in the monkey lateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 91: 555–560, 2004.
O'Scalaidhe SP, Wilson FAW, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Areal segregation of face-processing neurons in prefrontal cortex. Science 278: 1135–1138, 1997.
O'Scalaidhe SP, Wilson FAW, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Face-selective neurons during passive viewing and working memory performance of rhesus monkeys: evidence for intrinsic specialization of neuronal coding. Cereb Cortex 9: 459–475, 1999.
Passingham RE. Delayed matching after selective prefrontal cortex lesions in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Brain Res 92: 89–102, 1975.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Perret DI, Rolls ET, and Caan W. Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res 47: 329–342, 1982.[Web of Science][Medline]
Petrides M. Functional specialization within the dorsolateral frontal cortex for serial order memory. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 246: 299–306, 1991.[Medline]
Petrides M and Pandya DN. Projection to the frontal cortex from the posterior parietal region in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 228: 105–116, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rainer G, Asaad WF, and Miller EK. Memory fields of neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15008–15013, 1998a.
Rainer G, Asaad WF, and Miller EK. Selective representation of relevant information by neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature 393: 577–579, 1998b.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rao SC, Rainer G, and Miller EK. Integration of what and where in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 276: 821–824, 1997.
Rowe JB and Passingham RE. Working memory for location and time: activity in prefrontal area 46 relates to selection rather than maintenance in memory. Neuroimage 14: 77–86, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rowe JB, Toni I, Josephs O, Frackowiak RSJ, and Passingham RE. The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? Science 288: 1656–1660, 2000.
Sakagami M and Niki H. Encoding of behavioral significance of visual stimuli by primate prefrontal neurons: relation to relevant task conditions. Exp Brain Res 97: 423–436, 1994a.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sakagami M and Niki H. Spatial selectivity of go/no-go neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res 100: 165–169, 1994b.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sakagami M and Tsutsui K. The hierarchical organization of decision making in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Res 34: 79–89, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sakagami M, Tsutsui K, Lauwereyns J, Koizumi M, Kobayashi S, and Hikosaka O. A code for behavioral inhibition on the basis of color, but not motion, in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex of macaque monkey. J Neurosci 21: 4801–4808, 2001.
Sawaguchi T and Yamane I. Properties of delay-period neuronal activity in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a spatial delayed matching-to-sample task. J Neurophysiol 82: 2070–2080, 1999.
Seltzer B and Pandya DN. Frontal lobe connections of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 281: 97–113, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shimamura AP, Janowsky JS, and Squire LR. Memory for the temporal order of events in patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 28: 803–824, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Snyder LH, Batista AP, and Andersen RA. Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature 386: 167–170, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takeda K and Funahashi S. Prefrontal task-related activity representing visual cue location or saccade direction in spatial working memory task. J Neurophysiol 87: 567–588, 2002.
Ungerleider LG, Gaffan D, and Pelak VS. Projections from inferior temporal cortex to prefrontal cortex via the uncinate fascicle in rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 76: 473–484, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wagner AD, Maril A, Bjork RA, and Schacter DL. Prefrontal contribution to executive control: fMRI evidence for functional distinctions within lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 14: 1337–1347, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wallis JD, Anderson KC, and Miller EK. Single neurons in prefrontal cortex encode abstract rules. Nature 411: 953–956, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wallis JD and Miller EK. From rule to response: neuronal processes in the premotor and prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 1790–1806, 2003.
Watanabe M. Prefrontal unit activity during delayed conditional discriminations in the monkey. Brain Res 225: 51–65, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Watanabe M. Prefrontal unit activity during delayed conditional go/no-go discrimination in the monkey. I. Relation to the stimulus. Brain Res 382: 1–14, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Watanabe M. Prefrontal unit activity during associative learning in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 80: 296–309, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
Watanabe M. Frontal units of the monkey coding the associative significance of visual and auditory stimuli. Exp Brain Res 89: 233–247, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Webster MJ, Bachevalier J, and Ungerleider LG. Connections of inferior temporal TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cereb Cortex 5: 470–483, 1994.
Wilson FAW, O'Scalaidhe SP, and Goldman-Rakic PS. Dissociation of object and spatial processing in primate prefrontal cortex. Science 260: 1955–1958, 1993.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Salinas Rank-Order-Selective Neurons Form a Temporal Basis Set for the Generation of Motor Sequences J. Neurosci., April 8, 2009; 29(14): 4369 - 4380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. K. Berdyyeva and C. R. Olson Monkey Supplementary Eye Field Neurons Signal the Ordinal Position of Both Actions and Objects J. Neurosci., January 21, 2009; 29(3): 591 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Inoue and A. Mikami Top-Down Signal of Retrieved Information From Prefrontal to Inferior Temporal Cortices J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 1965 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Amiez and M. Petrides Selective involvement of the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the coding of the serial order of visual stimuli in working memory PNAS, August 21, 2007; 104(34): 13786 - 13791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Botvinick and T. Watanabe From Numerosity to Ordinal Rank: A Gain-Field Model of Serial Order Representation in Cortical Working Memory J. Neurosci., August 8, 2007; 27(32): 8636 - 8642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
, recording sites in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); 
, recording sites in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). AS, arcuate sulcus; PS, principal sulcus.
