JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 1115-1123, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00830.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z. Y.
Right arrow Articles by LaMotte, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z. Y.
Right arrow Articles by LaMotte, R. H.

Effects of a Chronic Compression of the Dorsal Root Ganglion on Voltage-Gated Na+ and K+ Currents in Cutaneous Afferent Neurons

Z. Y. Tan, D. F. Donnelly and R. H. LaMotte

Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Submitted 8 August 2005; accepted in final form 5 November 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
A chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion (CCD) produces ipsilateral cutaneous hyperalgesia that is associated with an increased excitability of neuronal somata in the compressed ganglion, as evidenced by spontaneous activity and a lower rheobase. We searched for differences in the properties of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents between somata of CCD- and control (unoperated) rats. CCD was produced in adult rats by inserting two rods through the intervertebral foramina, one compressing the L4, and the other, the ipsilateral, L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG). After 5–9 days, DRG somata were dissociated and placed in culture for 16–26 h. Cutaneous neurons of medium size (35–45 µm), Fluorogold-labeled from the hindpaw, were selected for whole cell patch-clamp recording of action potentials and ion currents. In comparison with control neurons, CCD neurons had steady-state activation curves for TTX-sensitive (TTX-S) Na+ currents that were shifted in the hyperpolarizing direction, and CCD neurons had enhanced TTX-resistant (TTX-R) current. CCD neurons also had smaller, fast-inactivating K+ currents (Ka) at voltages from –30 to 50 mV. The reduction in Ka, the hyperpolarizing shift in TTX-S Na+ current activation, and the enhanced TTX-R Na+ current may all contribute to the enhanced neuronal excitability and thus to the pain and hyperalgesia associated with CCD.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In animal models of neuropathic pain that produce hyperalgesia and allodynia, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons often exhibit signs of hyperexcitability, such as ectopic spontaneous discharges, a reduction in rheobase, and a greater number of action potentials (APs) evoked by sustained depolarizing currents (Abdulla and Smith 2001aGo; Kim et al. 1998Go; Moore et al. 2002Go; Song et al. 2003aGo,bGo; Zhang et al. 1999Go).

The ionic mechanisms contributing to the hyperexcitability of DRG neurons after peripheral inflammation or neuronal injury have been widely studied, but results have differed between laboratories and models. For instance, after transection of the sciatic nerve, there is an up-regulation of rapidly repriming TTX-sensitive (TTX-S) Na+ channels and a down-regulation of two isoforms of TTX-resistant (TTX-R) Na+ channels (Abdulla and Smith 2002Go; Black et al. 1999Go; Dib-Hajj et al. 1999Go; Sleeper et al. 2000Go; Waxman et al. 1994Go). In addition, voltage-gated K+ currents and Ca2+ current are down-regulated as well (Abdulla and Smith 2001bGo; Everill and Kocsis 1999Go; Ishikawa et al. 1999Go; Yang et al. 2004Go). After inflammation of peripheral tissues by carrageenan injection, there is an up-regulation of mRNA and currents for both TTX-S and TTX-R Na+ channels (Black et al. 2004Go; Tanaka et al. 1998Go). In addition, gastric ulcers in rats and ileitis in guinea pigs are associated with a reduction of K+ currents in DRG neurons (Dang et al. 2004Go; Stewart et al. 2003Go).

In our laboratory, chronic compression of the DRG (CCD) is used in the rat as a model of the ganglion compression that can occur in humans after, for instance, foraminal or spinal stenosis, disk herniations, degenerative disorders, tumors, or spinal injuries. In this model, a rod is implanted into the lumbar intervertebral foramen, causing a chronic compression of the DRG (Hu and Xing 1998Go). These rats develop a cutaneous hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia on the ipsilateral foot. Electrophysiologic recordings of DRG neurons from CCD rats evidence an enhanced excitability including a decrease in the current and voltage thresholds required to elicit APs and an increase in the incidence of spontaneous activity (Hu and Xing 1998Go; Song et al. 2003aGo,bGo; Zhang et al. 1999Go).

The purpose of this study was to study the effects of CCD on both AP properties and voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents in cutaneous, medium-sized, dissociated DRG neurons. Our findings suggest that a negative shift of activation for voltage-gated Na+ channels, an increase in TTX-R Na+ current, and a decrease in fast-inactivating K+ currents could contribute to neuronal hyperexcitability in these neurons after CCD, including the decreased current and voltage threshold for APs and an increased capability to produce multiple APs during a sustained depolarization.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Fluorogold labeling of cutaneous neurons

Female Sprague-Dawley rats (140–160 g) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg, ip). A fluorogold solution in distilled water (1%, 0.05 ml; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was injected into the right lateral plantar region at several points (Oyelese and Kocsis 1996Go; Yao et al. 2003Go) to retrogradely label the cell bodies of cutaneous afferent neurons.

CCD surgery

Immediately after fluorogold labeling, one group of rats received no surgery and served as unoperated controls. In the other group of rats, the ipsilateral, right transverse process, and intervertebral foramina of L4 and L5 were exposed as described previously (Hu and Xing 1998Go; Song et al. 1999Go). A stainless steel L-shaped rod (0.63 mm diam and 4 mm in length) was inserted into each foramen, one at L4 and the other at the L5 ganglion. Another group of rats received no additional surgery and were used as controls. Sham operations (surgery before and without implantation) were not considered necessary because of the absence of behavioral effects of such surgery or electrophysiological differences between neurons from previously unoperated versus sham-operated controls (Zhang et al. 1999Go).

Cell preparation

Five to 9 days after Flurogold injection, the rats were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg, ip), and the L4 and L5 lumbar DRGs were exposed. In CCD rats, the correct placement of each implanted rod was confirmed. DRGs were removed from control or CCD rats and placed in complete saline solution (CSS) for cleaning and mincing. The CSS contained the following (in mM): 137 NaCl, 5.3 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 3 CaCl2, 25 sorbitol, and 10 HEPES. The connective tissue of the DRGs was digested for 25 min with collagenase A (1 mg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) and for another 25 min with collagenase D (1 mg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim) and papain (30 U/ml; Worthington, Lakewood, NJ) in CSS containing 0.5 mM EDTA and 2 µg of cysteine at 37°C as described previously (Rizzo et al. 1995Go; Yao et al. 2003Go). The cells were dissociated by trituration in culture medium containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin and 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor (Boehringer Mannheim) and plated on glass coverslips coated with polyornithine and laminin. The culture medium contained equal amounts of DMEM (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and F-12 (Invitrogen) with 10% fetal calf serum (HyClone, Logan, UT) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen). The cells were incubated at 37°C (5% CO2 balance air) for 1 h, after which culture medium without the inhibitor was added. Cells were cultured for 14–24 h before recording.

Electrophysiological recording

Coverslips were transferred to a recording chamber that was mounted on the stage of an upright microscope (BX50-WI, Olympus Optical, Tokyo. Japan). Neurons selected for recording were 35–45 µm in diameter and were positive for Fluorogold fluorescence. Patch pipettes (0.8–2 M{Omega}) were fabricated from borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). Neurons were recorded at room temperature in whole cell mode (Multiclamp 700A, Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) using pClamp 8.01 software (Axon Instruments). Data were filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at 10–50 kHz. The voltage drop across the access resistance was compensated at 50–80%. The chamber was filled with normal bath solution. Chemicals and other bath solutions were applied locally through a perfusion pipette (100 µm diam) using a drug application system (ALA Scientific Instruments, Long Island, NY). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise indicated.

Three stimulus protocols were used to compare the excitability of DRG neurons from CCD and control. A series of 400-ms depolarizing currents (0.1–2.5 nA in increments of 0.05–0.1 nA) were injected to induce one or more APs. The AP rheobase was defined as the minimum current required evoking an AP. Repetitive discharge of each cell was measured by counting the spikes evoked by injection of a 1,000-ms depolarizing current at 2.5 times of rheobase (Song et al. 2003aGo,bGo). The discharge patterns of the DRG neurons were classified into two types: 1) cells firing either one or two APs and 2) cells firing more than two APs. Other AP properties were measured from the first AP evoked by a series of 2-ms depolarizing currents injected (0–4.0 nA in increments of 0.1 nA). The AP voltage threshold was defined as the first point on the upstroke of an AP where the rising rate exceeded 50 mV/ms (Anderson et al. 1987Go). The AP amplitude was measured from the baseline to peak of the AP. The AP duration was measured at one-half of the peak amplitude. The afterhyperpolarization (AHP) amplitude was measured from the baseline to the valley peak, and the AHP duration was measured as an interval from the onset of the AHP to the point of 50% decay of the AHP.

Solutions for recording under current clamp

The bath solution contained (in mM) 145 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH, and the osmolarity adjusted to 300~310 mOsm. The pipette solution contained (in mM) 138 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, and 10 Na-HEPES. The pH was adjusted to 7.2, and the osmolarity was 290~300 mOsm.

Solutions for recording sodium currents

Sodium currents were measured under a reduced sodium gradient to reduce space clamp problems. The bath solution contained (in mM) 35 NaCl, 105 TEA Cl, 4 4-aminopyridine (4-AP), 2 BaCl2, 0.1 CaCl2, 0.1 CdCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with HEPES, and the osmolarity was adjusted to 300~310 mOsm. The pipette solution contained (in mM) 140 CsF, 10 NaCl, 10 EGTA, and 10 HEPES. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH, and the osmolarity to 290~300 mOsm. To isolate TTX-R Na+ currents, TTX (300 nM) was added to the bath solution.

Solutions for recording potassium current

The K+ bath solution contained (in mM) 140 choline Cl, 3 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 0.1 CdCl2, and 10 HEPES. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with Tris-base, and the osmolarity was adjusted to 300~310 mOsm. The pipette solution contained (in mM) 100 choline Cl, 40 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, and 10 HEPES. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with Tris-base, and osmolarity to 290~300 mOsm.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using pClampfit 8.1 (Axon Instruments) and SigmaPlot 8.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Data are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical differences between CCD and control neurons were analyzed by Student's t-test and {chi}2 tests. In the case of multiple comparisons, for instance, over a voltage range, data were initially analyzed using an ANOVA with repeated measures. If this revealed a significant difference, Student's t-tests were applied for post hoc testing with a Bonferroni correction applied to the probability criterion for significance that was initially set at P < 0.05.

For the analysis of steady-state activation, the peak sodium conductance (gNa) at different potentials was calculated, as a chord conductance, from the corresponding peak current, INa

Formula
where VNa is the reversal potential for sodium current. The conductance values were fitted to a Boltzman function using a least-squares fit to characterize the activation characteristics g/gmax = 1/{1 + exp[(Vg V)/kg]}

where Vg is the voltage for half-maximum activation and kg is the slope factor.

The steady-state inactivation parameter (h{infty}) was calculated at each prepulse potential by dividing the current evoked after a given prepulse potential by the current evoked after the maximal hyperpolarization potential. The inactivation parameter was fitted to a Boltzman function for determination of the half inactivation potential, Vh, and the slope factor

Formula

For the analysis of kinetics, the time constants for activation ({tau}m) and inactivation ({tau}h) for TTX-S and TTX-R sodium currents were measured at each potential over the voltage range of –40 to 10 mV.

A two-term exponential function was used to fit the falling phase of 4-AP–sensitive Ka currents. The current amplitude (Ifast and Islow) and time constant ({tau}fast and {tau}slow) for each cell were determined.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Passive membrane properties and AP characteristics

Fifty-five cutaneous DRG neurons of medium size were recorded by whole cell patch clamp. Thirty-one were from control rats and 24 from CCD. In addition, 26 control and 23 CCD cells were used to compare the capability of repetitive firing induced by the injection of current at 2.5 times rheobase.

The mean rheobase current was significantly smaller for CCD than for control neurons (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 7.9 ± 1.4 pA/pF; P < 0.05, Student's t-test). In addition, the voltage threshold was significantly more negative for CCD than for control neurons (–33.8 ± 1.9 vs. –26.0 ± 1.9 mV; P < 0.01, Student's t-test; Fig. 1). No significant difference was found between control and CCD group in cell capacitance, resting membrane potential, input resistance, AP amplitude, AP duration, AHP amplitude, or AHP duration (Table 1; Student's t-test). The percentage of cells discharging multiple (>2) APs was significantly higher in CCD than in control neurons (13/23 vs. 5/26; P < 0.01, {chi}2 test; Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Action potential (AP) properties under current-clamp recording. A: series of current steps, each 2-ms duration, were injected in increments of 100 pA to a control (left) and a chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion (CCD; right) neuron. Current threshold (rheobase) was the minimal amplitude of current that elicited an AP. Voltage threshold was taken as the 1st point on the upstroke of an AP where the rising rate exceeded 50 mV/ms (arrows). Both current and voltage thresholds were lower for the CCD than for the control neuron. B: accommodation in response to an injected current of 2.5 times rheobase and 1-s duration. Control neuron discharged 1 AP, whereas the CCD neuron discharged 9 APs.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Membrane properties of control and CCD neurons

 
Voltage-gated Na+ currents

Voltage-gated Na+ current was measured (Fig. 2) first in the absence of TTX to obtain the total Na+ current and then in the presence of TTX to obtain the TTX-resistant (TTX-R) current. By subtracting the latter from the former, the TTX-sensitive (TTX-S) current was obtained. The activating and inactivating kinetics were faster for TTX-S currents than for TTX-R currents (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Representative families of voltage-gated sodium currents. Currents are shown for a control neuron (A, C, and E) and a CCD neuron (B, D, and F). For each neuron, membrane potential was held at –70 mV. Whole cell sodium currents were elicited by a series of 50-ms test pulses ranging from –70 to +50 mV in 10-mV steps. A and B: total sodium currents. C and D: TTX-resistant (TTX-R) currents obtained during application of 300 nM TTX. E and F: TTX-sensitive (TTX-S) currents obtained by subtracting TTX-R currents from total.

 
TTX-S currents

TTX-S currents were activated at approximately –50 mV for CCD and control neurons and reached peak current values near –20 mV (Fig. 3A). Student's t-tests were used to test for differences in current between CCD and control groups. Peak current values were not significantly different between control and CCD neurons (CCD: –136.4 ± 27.1 pA/pF; n = 16; control: –143.3 ± 18.0 pA/pF; n = 18). However, at –40 mV the mean current amplitude was significantly higher for the CCD group (-111.8 ± 24.4 pA/pF) than for the control group (–44.6 ± 15.0 pA/pF). No significant difference in current amplitude was found between CCD and control groups at higher activation voltages.


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Comparison of mean voltage-current relationships for voltage-gated sodium currents in control and CCD neurons. Mean peak TTX-S current (A) and TTX-R Na+ current (B) evoked by each voltage was obtained, as shown in Fig. 2, from control and CCD neurons (bullet and {circ}, respectively). *P < 0.05 (Student's t-test, CCD vs. control).

 
The TTX-S current for each neuron was converted to a conductance and fitted to a Boltzman function (Fig. 4A). The mid-point of activation was significantly more negative in CCD than in control neurons (–40.9 ± 2.2 mV, n = 16 vs. –32.9 ± 1.4 mV, n = 18, respectively; Student's t-test). However, the slope factor was not significantly different between CCD and control neurons (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 4.0 ± 0.6 mV, respectively). The steady-state inactivation parameter, h, was also fitted to a Boltzman function for each neuron. Unlike the activation function, the two groups did not differ in their steady-state inactivation characteristics. The half-inactivation potentials were –59.7 ± 3.4 mV (n = 14) for CCD and –57.4 ± 1.8 mV (n = 16) for control neurons. Slope values were 4.0 ± 0.6 mV for the CCD group (n = 14) and 5.1 ± 0.4 mV for control cells (n = 16).


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Activation and steady-state inactivation characteristics of sodium currents in control and CCD neurons. Mean relative peak conductance of TTX-S and TTX-R Na+ current normalized to the maximal conductance (G/Gmax) is plotted against voltage. A: steady-state activation and inactivation characteristics of TTX-S currents. Activation was measured by applying a series of depolarizing voltage pulses between –70 and 0 mV from a holding potential of –70 mV. CCD neurons ({circ}) had significantly higher levels of activation at –40 and –50 mV compared with control neurons (bullet; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Student's t-test). Steady-state inactivation was determined by using 500-ms conditioning pulses to voltages between –130 and –20 mV and a 20-ms test pulse to –20 mV. No significant differences in levels of inactivation were observed between the 2 groups (Student's t-test). B: steady-state activation and inactivation characteristics of TTX-R currents. No significant differences were observed between groups in the voltage-dependence of activation or inactivation for TTX-R currents (Student's t-test).

 
The time constants of activation and inactivation of the Na current were measured at voltages within the range of –40 to 10 mV for CCD (n = 12) and control (n = 17) neurons (Fig. 5). Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to compare time constants for control and CCD neurons across the entire range of voltages (without post hoc analyses). The mean inactivation time constant was significantly lower in the CCD group than that in control group (df = 1,27; F = 11.153; P < 0.01; Fig. 5A). However, there was no significant difference in the mean activation time constant between CCD (n = 12) and control (n = 17) neurons (df = 1,27; F = 0.791).


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Comparison of the kinetics of voltage-gated sodium currents in control and CCD neurons. Time constants of activation and inactivation were measured from the sodium current waveform at each potential over the range of –40 to +10 mV. A: activation ({tau}m) and inactivation ({tau}h) time constants for the TTX-S current. Note that CCD significantly reduced the inactivation time constant (repeated-measures ANOVA; no post hoc tests performed). B: activation and inactivation time constants for the TTX-R currents. CCD induced no significant change in the kinetics of TTX-R (repeated-measures ANOVA).

 
TTX-R currents

Because some neurons expressed little or no TTX-R current, analyses of TTX-R current magnitude/kinetics were only undertaken on cells whose ratio of peak TTX-R to TTX-S currents was >10% at –20 mV. This criterion reduced the population to nine cells from the control group and nine cells from the CCD group. The relative proportion of cells that met the above criteria was not different between control (39.1%) and CCD (42.9%; P > 0.05, {chi}2 test). The mean diameters of these cells were 39.7 ± 1.2 µm for control and 40.4 ± 1.0 µm for the CCD group.

TTX-R currents activated at around –40 mV for both CCD and control groups (Fig. 3B) and reached maximal levels at –20 mV (Fig. 3B). The current amplitudes at –30 and –20 mV were significantly higher for the CCD group (–89.1 ± 23.1 and –109.7 ± 17.5 pA/pF, n = 9) than for the control group (–37.5 ± 12.8 and –61.9 ± 16.0 pA/pF, n = 9, Student's t-test), respectively.

There was no significant difference between CCD and control groups in activation and steady-state inactivation (Fig. 4B, Student's t-test). The mean mid-points and mean slope factors of activation curves were –25.9 ± 2.9 and 7.5 ± 1.8 mV for CCD (n = 9) and –28.6 ± 2.1 and 5.8 ± 1.1 mV for control (n = 9). The mid-points and slope factors of inactivation curves were –42.0 ± 3.3 and 2.5 ± 0.5 mV for CCD (n = 7) and –43.2 ± 4.0 and 4.5 ± 1.2 mV for control (n = 9).

The time constants of activation and inactivation were measured for voltages within the range of –40 to 10 mV (Fig. 5B). There were no significant differences in the mean activation or mean inactivation time constants between CCD (n = 9) and control (n = 9) (repeated-measures ANOVA).

Voltage-gated K+ currents

Voltage-gated K+ currents were recorded as shown in Fig. 6. The command potential protocol was initially undertaken from a holding potential of –100 mV and repeated from a holding potential of –30 mV. Because the inactivating components inactivated at –30 mV and the sustained current, Kdr, was evoked from –30 mV, a subtraction of the current waveforms elicited at the two holding potentials yielded the inactivating current, Ka (Fig. 6).


Figure 6
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Representative families of voltage-gated potassium currents. Currents are shown for a control neuron (A, C, and E) and a CCD neuron (B, D, and F). Whole cell potassium currents were elicited by a series of 400-ms test pulses ranging from –60 to +50 mV in 10-mV steps. A and B: neuron was held at –100 mV before each pulse. C and D: neuron was held at –30 mV before each pulse. E and F: Ka currents were obtained by subtracting currents in C and D from those in A and B, respectively.

 
The amplitudes of Ka currents for CCD neurons (n = 15) were significantly lower than those of controls (n = 16; df = 1,29; F = 13.89; P < 0.001, repeated-measures ANOVA; Fig. 7A). For example, at +20 mV, the mean Ka currents were 34.0 ± 5.1 pA/pF for CCD neurons and 60.9 ± 7.5 pA/pF for controls. Post hoc comparisons of differences between individual means were performed using a sequence of Student's t-test starting at test pulses of –40 mV until significant differences were obtained for –30 and –20 V (P < 0.01, using Bonferroni corrections). The differences between individual means for all voltages positive to –20 mV were clearly significant as these were even greater than those tested. In contrast, there was no significant difference between CCD and control neurons in the amplitudes of Kdr currents from –60 to +50 mV (repeated-measures ANOVA; df = 1,29; F = 0.13; P = 0.73; Fig. 7B).


Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Comparison of mean current-voltage relationships for voltage-gated potassium currents in control and CCD neurons. A: mean current-voltage relationships for fast inactivating voltage-gated potassium current (Ka) in control and CCD neurons (bullet and {circ}, respectively). Peak currents (as shown in Fig. 5, E and F) are plotted as a function of voltage. Ka was significantly higher for CCD than control neurons for voltages of –30 to 50 mV (repeated-measures ANOVA and Student's t-test). B: mean current-voltage relationships for sustained voltage-gated potassium current (Kdr) for control and CCD neurons. Currents were obtained at the end of a 400-ms pulse depolarized from a holding potential of –30 mV as shown in Fig. 5, C and D. Kdr did not differ significantly for CCD and control neurons (repeated-measures ANOVA).

 
In other experiments, Ka was separated from Kdr using the channel blocker 4-AP (6 mM) to preferentially block the Ka current (Fig. 8, A and B). The current evoked in the presence of 4-AP was subtracted from the total current (without 4-AP) to obtain the 4-AP–sensitive current. The mean amplitude of the 4-AP–sensitive current for CCD neurons (43.3 ± 6.1 pA/pF, n = 17) was significantly lower than that of controls (85.2 ± 9.9 pA/pF, n = 18) at a test pulse depolarized from –100 to +50 mV (P < 0.01, Student's t-test; Fig. 8C). At the same test pulse, no significant difference was found in the amplitude of the 4-AP–insensitive currents between CCD (116.4 ± 10.2 pA/pF, n = 17) and control neurons (138.8 ± 11.2 pA/pF, n = 18, Student's t-test; Fig. 8C).


Figure 8
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Comparisons of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP)-sensitive and -insensitive components of voltage-gated potassium currents in control and CCD rats. Potassium currents elicited from a depolarization from –100 to +50 mV were recorded in the absence and presence of 6 mM 4-AP. 4-AP–sensitive components were obtained by subtracting currents in the presence of 4-AP from those without 4-AP. Currents are shown from for a control (A) and a CCD (B) neuron. C: mean peak 4-AP–sensitive current (4-AP-S), and 4-AP–insensitive current (4-AP-I) for control and CCD neurons (filled and open bars, respectively. Error bars are SE. *P < 0.01 (Student's t-test, CCD vs. control).

 
The fast and slow inactivating components of the 4-AP–sensitive Ka currents were compared after fitting the inactivating phase to a two-term exponential function (Table 2). The fast inactivating component of Ka currents was significantly smaller for CCD than that for control neurons (Student's t-test; Table 2). However, there was no significant difference in the slower inactivating component between CCD and control neurons. There was also no significant difference in the fast and slow time constants between CCD and control cells (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Fast and slow inactivating components of 4-AP–sensitive Ka currents in control and CCD neurons

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Previous studies showed that CCD causes an increase in the excitability of DRG somata recorded in the intact ganglion (Zhang et al. 1999Go) and in ganglion neurons after dissociation (Ma and LaMotte 2005Go). Both of these studies used sharp electrode recording and did not label neurons from their peripheral receptive fields. In this study, we confirmed the enhanced excitability produced by CCD using whole cell patch-clamp recordings and focused on one particular neuronal population—cutaneous neurons of medium size that are labeled after Flurogold injection to the hindpaw.

Intact neurons with medium-sized cell bodies and myelinated axons include those that have peripheral nociceptors and others that have low-threshold mechanoreceptors (e.g., Fang et al. 2005Go; Ma et al. 2003Go). Nonnociceptive neurons with myelinated axons are thought to contribute to pain or altered pain states after peripheral inflammation or nerve injury by contributing, for example, to the production or maintenance of central sensitization or to the allodynia believed to be caused by the sensitization (Ma and Woolf 1996Go; Neumann et al. 1996Go; Noguchi et al. 1995Go). After CCD, medium-sized neurons can develop abnormal spontaneous activity and/or exhibit AP activity in response to inflammatory mediators (as can subpopulations of neurons with small and large sized cell bodies) (Ma and LaMotte 2005Go) and an increased density of hyperpolarization-activated cation current (IH) that may contribute to increased repetitive firing (Yao et al. 2003Go). The hyperexcitability of medium-sized neurons may therefore contribute to the cutaneous hyperalgesia that develops ipsilateral to a CCD injury (Song et al. 1999Go; Zhang et al. 1999Go).

The main signs of hyperexcitability in cutaneous, medium-sized neurons were a decrease in the threshold current/voltage required to generate an AP and an increased capability to repetitively fire. Several factors may contribute to the enhanced excitability observed in CCD neurons—a hyperpolarizing shift in the TTX-S activation curve, an enhanced magnitude of TTX-R current, and a reduction in Ka current in CCD compared with control neurons. The shift in TTX-S activation would cause a net increase in inward current at a more hyperpolarized potential and lead to a more negative voltage threshold for a regenerative depolarization to occur. An increase in TTX-R current would also support a more negative threshold voltage, because the threshold for a regenerative depolarization (Table 1) is above the threshold for TTX-R activation (Fig. 3). A decrease in Ka currents could also lead to a decrease in the accommodative properties of neurons after CCD, thereby increasing their capacities to fire repetitively (Yoshimura and de Groat 1999Go).

A decrease in Ka and an increase in TTX-R current would be expected to prolong the AP duration by reducing the repolarization current and enhancing the duration of Na influx. However, AP duration was not significantly altered in CCD. This was likely caused by the enhanced speed of inactivation of TTX-S current observed after CCD, which may have balanced the prolonging actions of TTX-R and Ka on AP duration.

Changes in Na channel expression or activity have been observed in other models of neuropathic pain, but the direction of change has been variable. A partial or total transection of the sciatic nerve caused an up-regulation of Nav 1.3, a TTX-S isoform that is usually expressed only in the neonatal period (Black et al. 1999Go; Dib-Hajj et al. 1999Go; Waxman et al. 1994Go). Nav1.3 is similarly up-regulated after carrageenan inflammation of the ipsilateral paw (Black et al. 2004Go; Tanaka et al. 1998Go). Although we did not identify changes in specific isoforms after CCD, we observed no change in the magnitude or steady-state properties associated with the inactivation of TTX-S current in our neurons. This suggests that there was no major change in TTX-S isoforms expressed in our cells. However, there was a leftward shift in the voltage of activation for the TTX-S current by 8 mV. Although the reason for this shift is not identified, a similar shift in activation is observed in hippocampal cells during exposure to pertussis toxin, suggesting that activation of a G protein–coupled pathway may occur with CCD (Ma et al. 1994Go). Results on TTX-R currents have been variable. We observed an up-regulation of TTX-R current after CCD—a result also observed in small neurons after carrageenan inflammation (Black et al. 2004Go; Tanaka et al. 1998Go). In contrast, the message for TTX-R current isoforms decreased after sciatic nerve transection, but it is unclear whether the membrane current was similarly decreased (Black et al. 1999Go; Dib-Hajj et al. 1999Go; Waxman et al. 1994Go). The variability of expression changes in different models of neuropathic pain suggest that multiple mechanisms may give rise to enhanced excitability of DRG neurons, resulting in a similar behavioral outcome.

Unlike changes in Na channel expression, changes in K+ current have been relatively consistent among models of neuropathic pain. After transection of the sciatic nerve, K+ currents (Ka, Kdr, and calcium-activated K+ currents) decreased in DRG neurons (Abdulla and Smith 2001bGo; Everill and Kocsis 1999Go). Ka was decreased in DRG neurons innervating an inflamed stomach wall (Dang et al. 2004Go) and an inflamed bladder (Yoshimura and de Groat 1999Go), and both Ka and sustained K+ currents were reduced in DRG neurons supplying an inflamed portion of the ileum (Stewart et al. 2003Go). In this study, the CCD-induced decrease in Ka currents was not accompanied by a change in sustained K+ currents. A selective down-regulation of Ka currents, which could contribute to AP threshold and repetitive firing of DRG neuron, may increase the response to a nociceptive stimulus and contribute to cutaneous hyperalgesia—i.e., the enhanced withdrawal to noxious stimuli that occurs after CCD (Song et al. 1999Go).

Different isoforms of voltage-gated K+ currents are expressed in DRG neurons, and several may change after injury. For instance, the mRNAs of Kv1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 (Ka), kv2.2, and kv4.2 (Ka), 4.3 (Ka) are expressed in DRG neurons and were reduced after sciatic nerve injury (Ishikawa et al. 1999Go; Yang et al. 2004Go). Although we have not identified a specific isoform changed in CCD, a likely candidate is one contributing to a fast inactivating current, such as would be expected from Kv1.4 and Kv4.2. Currently, experiments are underway in our laboratory to provide a better molecular identification.

The increased expression of TTX-R and reduced expression of Ka may both contribute to the tendency of CCD neurons to generate multiple APs during a sustained depolarization. TTX-R currents in DRG (primarily Nav.1.8) inactivate at more depolarized potentials than TTX-S currents and thus would be available to mediate a regenerative depolarization during a prolonged stimulus. Previous work from our laboratory also showed an increased expression of hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) current in CCD neurons. This current is activated during the AHP that follows an AP and leads to a sustained depolarizing current, resulting in repetitive firing (Yao et al. 2003Go). Thus multiple changes in Na channel expression, Ka channels, and Ih currents may contribute to repetitive AP generation in CCD neurons.

In summary, this study identified several changes in Na+ and K+ current characteristics that may explain the enhanced excitability of DRG neurons after CCD. These are 1) a negative shift in the voltage of activation of TTX-S currents but no change in overall level of expression, 2) an increase in TTX-R current expression, and 3) a decreased expression of a fast inactivating K+ current.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-14624.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank P. Zhang and Z. Xue for technical assistance.

Present address of Z.-Y. Tan: 602 MRC, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. H. LaMotte, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Yale Univ. School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 (E-mail: robert.lamotte{at}yale.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Abdulla FA and Smith PA. Axotomy- and autotomy-induced changes in the excitability of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol 85: 630–643, 2001a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abdulla FA and Smith PA. Axotomy- and autotomy-induced changes in Ca2+ and K+ channel currents of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol 85: 644–658, 2001b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abdulla FA and Smith PA. Changes in Na+ channel currents of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons following axotomy and axotomy-induced autotomy. J Neurophysiol 88: 2518–2529, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Anderson P, Storm J, and Wheal HV. Thresholds of action potentials evoked by synapses on the dendrites of pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol 383: 509–526, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Black JA, Cummins TR, Plumpton C, Chen YH, Hormuzdiar W, Clare JJ, and Waxman SG. Upregulation of a silent sodium channel after peripheral, but not central, nerve injury in DRG neurons. J Neurophysiol 82: 2776–2785, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Black JA, Liu S, Tanaka M, Cummins TR, and Waxman SG. Changes in the expression of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium channels within dorsal root ganglia neurons in inflammatory pain. Pain 108: 237–247, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dang K, Bielefeldt K, and Gebhart GF. Gastric ulcers reduce A-type potassium currents in rat gastric sensory ganglion neurons. Am J Physiol 286: G573–G579, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Dib-Hajj SD, Fjell J, Cummins TR, Zheng Z, Fried K, LaMotte R, Black JA, and Waxman SG. Plasticity of sodium channel expression in DRG neurons in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. Pain 83: 591–600, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Everill B and Kocsis JD. Reduction in potassium currents in identified cutaneous afferent dorsal root ganglion neurons after axotomy. J Neurophysiol 82: 700–708, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fang X, McMullan S, Lawson SN, and Djouhri LJ. Electrophysiological differences between nociceptive and non-nociceptive dorsal root ganglion neurones in the rat in vivo. Physiologist 565: 927–943, 2005.

Hu SJ and Xing JL. An experimental model for chronic compression of dorsal root ganglion produced by intervertebral foramen stenosis in the rat. Pain 77: 15–23, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ishikawa K, Tanaka M, Black JA, and Waxman SG. Changes in expression of voltage-gated potassium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons following axotomy. Muscle Nerve 22: 502–507, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kim YI, Na HS, Kim SH, Han HC, Yoon YW, Sung B, Nam HJ, Shin SL, and Hong SK. Cell type-specific changes of the membrane properties of peripherally-axotomized dorsal root ganglion neurons in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 86: 301–309, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ma C and LaMotte RH. Enhanced excitability of dissociated primary sensory neurons after chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion in the rat. Pain 113: 106–112, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ma C, Shu Y, Zheng Z, Chen Y, Yao H, Greenquist KW, White FW, and LaMotte RH. Similar electrophysiological changes in axotomized and neighboring intact dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol 89: 1588–1602, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ma JY, Li M, Catterall WA, and Scheuer T. Modulation of brain Na+ channels by a G-protein-coupled pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 12351–12355, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ma QP and Woolf CJ. Progressive tactile hypersensitivity: an inflammation-induced incremental increase in the excitability of the spinal cord. Pain 67: 97–106, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Moore BA, Stewart TM, Hill C, and Vanner SJ. TNBS ileitis evokes hyperexcitability and changes in ionic membrane properties of nociceptive DRG neurons. Am J Physiol 282: G1045–G1051, 2002.[Web of Science]

Neumann S, Doubell TP, Leslie T, and Woolf CJ. Inflammatory pain hypersensitivity mediated by phenotypic switch in myelinated primary sensory neurons. Nature 384: 360–364, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]

Noguchi K, Kawai Y, Fukuoka T, Senba E, and Miki K. Substance P induced by peripheral nerve injury in primary afferent sensory neurons and its effect on dorsal column nucleus neurons. J Neurosci 15: 7633–7643, 1995.[Abstract]

Oyelese AA and Kocsis JD. GABAA-receptor-mediated conductance and action potential waveform in cutaneous and muscle afferent neurons of the adult rat: differential expression and response to nerve injury. J Neurophysiol 76: 2383–2392, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rizzo MA, Kocsis JD, and Waxman SG. Selective loss of slow and enhancement of fast Na+ currents in cutaneous afferent dorsal root ganglion neurones following axotomy. Neurobiol Dis 2: 87–96, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rush AM, Brau ME, Elliott AA, and Elliott JR. Electrophysiological properties of sodium current subtypes in small cells from adult rat dorsal root ganglia. J Physiol 511: 771–789, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sleeper AA, Cummins TR, Dib-Hajj SD, Hormuzdiar W, Tyrrell L, Waxman SG, and Black JA. Changes in expression of two tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels and their currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons after sciatic nerve injury but not rhizotomy. J Neurosci 20: 7279–7289, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song XJ, Hu SJ, Greenquist KW, Zhang JM, and LaMotte RH. Mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia and ectopic neuronal discharge after chronic compression of dorsal root ganglia. J Neurophysiol 82: 3347–3358, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song XJ, Vizcarra C, Xu DS, Rupert RL, and Wong ZN. Hyperalgesia and neural excitability following injuries to central and peripheral branches of axons and somata of dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol 89: 2185–2193, 2003a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Song XJ, Xu DS, Vizcarra C, and Rupert RL. Onset and recovery of hyperalgesia and hyperexcitability of sensory neurons following intervertebral foramen volume reduction and restoration. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26: 426–436, 2003b.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Stewart T, Beyak MJ, and Vanner S. Ileitis modulates potassium and sodium currents in guinea pig dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons. J Physiol 552: 797–807, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanaka M, Cummins TR, Ishikawa K, Dib-Hajj SD, Black JA, and Waxman SG. SNS Na+ channel expression increases in dorsal root ganglion neurons in the carrageenan inflammatory pain model. Neuroreport 9: 967–972, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]

Waxman SG, Kocsis JD, and Black JA. Type III sodium channel mRNA is expressed in embryonic but not adult spinal sensory neurons, and is reexpressed following axotomy. J Neurophysiol 72: 466–470, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang EK, Takimoto K, Hayashi Y, de Groat WC, and Yoshimura N. Altered expression of potassium channel subunit mRNA and alpha-dendrotoxin sensitivity of potassium currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons after axotomy. Neuroscience 123: 867–874, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yao H, Donnelly DF, Ma C, and LaMotte RH. Upregulation of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current after chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion. J Neurosci 23: 2069–2074, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshimura N and de Groat WC. Increased excitability of afferent neurons innervating rat urinary bladder after chronic bladder inflammation. J Neurosci 19: 4644–4653, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang JM, Song XJ, and LaMotte RH. Enhanced excitability of sensory neurons in rats with cutaneous hyperalgesia produced by chronic compression of the dorsal root ganglion. J Neurophysiol 82: 3359–3366, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
Q. Gu, M. E. Lim, G. J. Gleich, and L.-Y. Lee
Mechanisms of eosinophil major basic protein-induced hyperexcitability of vagal pulmonary chemosensitive neurons
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): L453 - L461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Ma and R. H. LaMotte
Multiple Sites for Generation of Ectopic Spontaneous Activity in Neurons of the Chronically Compressed Dorsal Root Ganglion
J. Neurosci., December 19, 2007; 27(51): 14059 - 14068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-H. Zheng, E. T. Walters, and X.-J. Song
Dissociation of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Induces Hyperexcitability That Is Maintained by Increased Responsiveness to cAMP and cGMP
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. H. Sun, B. Yang, D. F. Donnelly, C. Ma, and R. H. LaMotte
MCP-1 Enhances Excitability of Nociceptive Neurons in Chronically Compressed Dorsal Root Ganglia
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2189 - 2199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. M. Hingtgen
A New "Kine" of Pain: MCP-1 and Sensory Neuron Excitability. Focus on "MCP-1 Enhances Excitability of Nociceptive Neurons in Chronically Compressed Dorsal Root Ganglia"
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2171 - 2172.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z. Y.
Right arrow Articles by LaMotte, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, Z. Y.
Right arrow Articles by LaMotte, R. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.