| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Submitted 30 November 2005; accepted in final form 30 October 2005
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
45% of the neurons tested, DA (5–50 x 10–5 M) reduced the amplitude of outward currents in the cells. In addition to a slowly activating, sustained outward current, DA reduced the amplitude of a rapidly activating, transient outward conductance in some cells. Both of the currents modulated by DA could be abolished by the removal of Ca2+ from the external medium or by treatment of cells with charybdotoxin (2 x 10–8 M), a blocker of Ca2+-dependent K+ currents in the cells. Ca2+ currents were not affected by DA, nor were A-type K+ currents (IA). Results suggest that the delayed rectifier-like current (IKV) also remains intact in the presence of DA. Taken together, our data indicate that Ca2+-dependent K+ currents are targets of DA modulation in honey bee AL neurons. This study lends support to the hypothesis that DA plays a role in the developing brain of the bee. |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
). Their arrival triggers the formation of prominent subunits of synaptic neuropil called glomeruli (Mobbs 1982; Pareto 1972; Suzuki 1975; see also, Boeckh and Tolbert 1993; Hansson and Anton 2000; Oland and Tolbert 1987, 1996; Rospars 1988; Salecker and Boeckh 1996), which are the functional subunits of the AL neuropil (Joerges et al. 1997; Sachse et al. 1999; Stopfer et al. 1997; see also Christensen and Hildebrand 1987; Hansson and Anton 2000). Each glomerulus contains the terminal arbors of antennal sensory afferent neurons, processes of local interneurons, dendrites of projection (output) neurons, and ramifications of centrifugal neurons that project to the ALs from other sites in the brain (Abel et al. 2001; Flanagan and Mercer 1989; Fonta et al.1993; Homberg 1984; Müller et al. 2002; Sun et al. 1993).
Immediately before glomerulus formation (pupal stage 3), developing ALs are invaded by dopamine (DA)-immunoreactive processes that ramify extensively in the central neuropil of the lobes (Kirchhof et al. 1999). These processes originate from cell bodies located in the lateral deutocerebral soma rind, posterior to each AL (Kirchhof et al. 1999; Schäfer and Rehder 1989). The same cells extend processes into the dorsal lobe of the deutocerebrum, as well as to the protocerebrum and suboesphageal ganglion (Schäfer and Rehder 1989). Around pupal stage 4, there is a surge in DA levels in the ALs, and rapid neurite outgrowth apparent in stage 5 AL neurons in vitro is enhanced by exposure to DA (Kirchhof et al. 1999). While the identity of the receptors that mediate the effects of DA has yet to be determined, mRNA for three DA receptor genes, Amdop1 (Blenau et al. 1998), Amdop2 (Humphries et al. 2003), and Amdop3 (Beggs et al. 2005), has been detected in cells that surround the developing AL neuropil of the bee (Beggs et al. 2005; Kurshan et al. 2003). The expression of these genes, in particular Amdop2, is strongly developmentally regulated (Kurshan et al. 2003), suggesting that DA plays a central role in the developing brain of the bee (Kirchhof and Mercer 1997; Kirchhof et al. 1999; Kokay et al. 1999; Kurshan et al. 2003).
In adult worker bees, DA levels in the brain (Kokay and Mercer 1997; Schulz and Robinson 1999; Taylor et al. 1992), and levels of dopamine receptor gene expression (Humphries et al. 2003; Kokay and Mercer 1997) change markedly during the lifetime of the bee. Intriguingly, regardless of age, DA levels in the ALs of foragers are higher than in the ALs of bees performing nursing duties, suggesting that DA in ALs is linked to behavioral state (Schulz and Robinson 1999). While it has been suggested that biogenic amines such as DA might influence response thresholds for task-related stimuli (Bicker and Menzel 1989; Hammer 1993; Macmillan and Mercer 1987; Mercer and Menzel 1982; Scheiner et al. 2002; Schulz and Robinson 1999), relatively little is known about the mechanisms through which this amine operates in the brain of the bee.
In this study, whole cell voltage-clamp recordings were used to examine the modulatory actions of DA on ionic currents expressed by honey bee AL neurons in vitro. Our results reveal that Ca2+-activated K+ currents are targets of DA modulation in these cells.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Frames of honey bee brood collected from hives at the Department of Zoology, University of Otago, were kept for periods of 
1 wk in a humidified incubator at 35°C. Metamorphic adult development in the honey bee occurs over an 8- to 9-day period. Pupal honey bees at stages 4–6 (P4–P6) of the nine stages of metamorphic adult development were collected from the brood frames. The stage of development was ascertained by using a method similar to that described by Jay (1962) based on external cues, such as eye color and head pigmentation. The experiments described in this work comply with the laws of New Zealand regulating scientific research.
Cell cultures
Primary cell cultures were prepared from the ALs of pupal bees as described elsewhere (Kirchhof and Mercer 1997; Kreissl and Bicker 1992). The heads of 8–10 pupal bees were removed from their bodies, placed in a dish lined with sylgard (Dow Corning, Midland, MI), and secured with insect mounting pins. The front of the head capsule and glandular tissue surrounding the brain were removed. The exposed brain was rinsed with modified Leibovitz L-15 culture medium (BL15, pH 7.2, 500 mOsm) supplemented with 4.0 g glucose, 2.5 g fructose, 24.0 g sucrose, and 3.3 g proline per liter (all purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO). ALs were removed with fine forceps and placed in fresh BL-15 medium. The remaining steps took place under sterile conditions. To aid dissociation of the tissue, ALs were exposed to a hyperosmotic culture medium (BL-15 supplemented with an additional 20.0 g/l sucrose, 580 mOsm) for 10 min and transferred into a Ca2+- and Mg2+-free honey bee Ringer (in mM: 135 NaCl, 5 KCl, and 114.5 Tris-HCl; pH 7.2, 460 mOsm) for the same period. The tissue was rinsed briefly in culture medium (BL-15), excess fluid was removed, and the ALs (6/250 µl) were dissociated by trituration. The dissociated cells were transferred in 100-µl aliquots to the center of an uncoated plastic culture dish (Falcon, 3001) and allowed to adhere to the substrate for 3–5 min. The dishes were filled with 2 ml of culture medium (BL15) and placed in a humidified incubator at 28°C. Cells were maintained in culture for 4–5 days before use.
Whole cell recording
Patch-clamp recordings in whole cell configuration (Hamill et al. 1981) were used to examine DA modulation of ionic currents in honey bee AL neurons in vitro. The voltage-gated and Ca2+-dependent currents examined in this study have been described in detail elsewhere (for descriptions in Apis mellifera see Grünewald 2003; Kloppenburg et al. 1999b; Pelz et al. 1999; Schäfer et al. 1994; for review, see Wicher et al. 2001). These currents include a transient A-type K+ current (IA), a sustained, delayed rectifier-like current (IKV), Ca2+-activated K+ currents (IKCa), a Ca2+ current (ICa), and a rapidly activating transient TTX-sensitive current carried by Na+ (INa). Cells were viewed under an IMT-2 microscope (Olympus) using phase-contrast optics. All experiments were conducted at room temperature. Recording electrodes (2–3 M
) were prepared from borosilicate glass (100-µl micropipettes, 1.71 mm OD, 1.32 mm ID; VWR Scientific, West Chester, CA) using a Flaming-Brown micropipette puller (P-87, Sutter Instruments) and backfilled with a solution containing (in mM) 100 K-aspartate, 40 KF, 20 KCl, 2.5 MgCl2, 1 EGTA, 160 sucrose, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.2). Throughout the recording period, cells were continuously superfused with artificial insect saline (AIS) containing (in mM) 130 NaCl, 6 KCl, 4 MgCl2, 5 CaCl2, 160 sucrose, 25 glucose, and 10 HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.2, 500 mOsm). Junction potentials were nullified before seal formation. Recordings were made using an Axopatch 1D amplifier in conjunction with a CV4 1/100 headstage and Digidata 1200 interface (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Data were acquired using pClamp6 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) run on a 486 PC computer. Cells were clamped at a holding potential of –70 mV, and depolarizing voltage steps were used to activate voltage-gated channels in the cells. Membrane currents were filtered at 2 kHz using a low-pass four-pole Bessel filter and sampled at intervals of 100 µs. In most recordings, a P/4 protocol (see Armstrong and Bezanilla 1974) was used for digital subtraction of linear leak currents and capacitance artifacts. No compensation was made for series resistance, and therefore voltage errors may be present where currents measured were large. However, series resistance errors should not affect the central conclusions of this study.
Isolation of currents
Whole cell current profiles were examined initially in the absence of any blocking agents. Components of the whole cell current profile were isolated using routine pharmacological techniques described elsewhere (for Apis neurons, see Grünewald 2003; Kloppenburg et al. 1999b; Pelz et al. 1999; Schäfer et al. 1994; Wüstenberg et al. 2004). Na+ currents were blocked with TTX (10–7 M), whereas Ca2+ currents (and Ca2+-activated K+ currents) were blocked with 5 x 10–5 M CdCl2. Rapidly activating, transient (A-type) current (IA) was blocked with 4-aminopyridine (4-AP; 5 x 10–3 M), quinidine (5 x 10–5 M) was used to block the delayed-rectifier-like current, IKV, and K+ currents collectively were blocked by substituting K+ in the electrode solution with Cs+. To reveal the contribution that Ca2+-dependent K+ currents (IKCa) make to outward current profiles in Apis AL neurons, cells were exposed to Ca2+-free saline in which CaCl2 had been replaced with MgCl2. Effects of the IKCa blocker charybdotoxin (CTX; 2 x 10–8 M; reviewed by Garcia et al. 1995) were also tested in the cells. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma with the exception of TTX and CTX, both of which were purchased from Alomone Laboratories.
DA application
DA (dopamine hydrochloride, Sigma) was prepared in AIS immediately before use and pressure-ejected across the cell soma using a Picospritzer II (General Valve, Fairfield, NJ). DA was used at concentrations of between 5 and 50 x 10–5 M (pipette concentration). At these concentrations, effects of DA on DA-sensitive cells were immediately obvious, and the chances of observing at least some recovery during DA washout were maximized. DA was applied in 20-ms pulses delivered immediately before each depolarizing voltage step. Continuous superfusion of the recording chamber with fresh AIS prevented the localized accumulation of DA around cells between individual voltage steps. The delivery pipette was removed from the recording chamber, and the cells were superfused with DA-free AIS to facilitate recovery from any DA effect. As a result of Ca2+ current rundown in the cells, total outward current amplitudes decreased progressively over time. For this reason, effects of DA were examined over a 10-min recording period and compared with time-dependent changes in current amplitudes occurring in control (untreated) cells.
Statistical analysis
Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to determine the overall effect of DA application. This accounted for any serial correlation between data recorded from the same cell over time. In groups of cells recorded in the absence of blockers, and in cell groups recorded in the presence of TTX and 4-AP, small numbers of missing values at the +8-min time-point were estimated using multiple regression techniques, where the values of control or DA-treated groups recorded over the initial 6-min recording period were used to predict missing 8-min data points. Where significant overall, or group, effects were detected by ANOVA, Student's t-test for independent samples were performed post hoc to determine at which specific time-points the current amplitudes of DA-treated and untreated cell groups were significantly different. Student's t-test were also used to assess statistical differences in time-to-peak data. Significance was accepted at P = 0.05 except when multiple comparisons were made, where the level of significance was reduced according to Bonferroni's correction. Mean values are expressed as mean ± SE. All analyses were performed using SPSS 11.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Based on the composition of outward currents, AL neurons examined in this study (n = 51) could be grouped into two main categories (Fig. 1). In 71% of cells (n = 36), the outward current profile exhibited a rapidly activating transient component followed by a sustained component that showed little or no inactivation during the voltage step (Fig. 1Ai). With voltage steps above approximately –30 mV, the amplitude of the sustained outward currents in these cells increased linearly with each voltage step (Fig. 1Aii). Cells exhibiting this form of current profile are referred to here as type 1 cells. The remaining 29% of cells (type 2 cells, n = 15) exhibited outward currents in which the rapidly activating transient current seen in type 1 cells appeared to be absent, and the sustained component showed significant inactivation during the voltage step (Fig. 1Bi). In contrast to the outward current recorded in type 1 cells, the I/V curve for outward current in type 2 cells had a nonlinear relationship at potentials above +40 mV (Fig. 1Bii). The current profiles in type 2 cells are similar to those reported for AL projection (output) neurons (Grünewald 2003). We assume therefore that type 1 current profiles originate from cells belonging to the second major category of AL neurons, namely local AL interneurons, but this has yet to be confirmed. Here, attention is focused predominantly on cells exhibiting type 1 current profiles, although small numbers of type 2 cells were found to be responsive to DA (see following section).
|
Effects of DA on ionic currents were examined initially in the absence of any channel blockers. Changes in the amplitude of outward currents in cells exposed to DA (DA-treated; n = 13) were compared with those observed in cells receiving no DA treatment (untreated, n = 18). In the majority of DA-treated cells (54%), DA had no effect on the amplitude of currents contributing to the whole cell current profile. In 46% of the DA-treated cells, however, exposure to DA caused a pronounced reduction in the amplitude of outward currents in the cells (Fig. 2, Ai–Aiii). Among the DA-sensitive cells, there were four type 1 cells and two type 2 cells. Washing in DA-free saline partially reversed the effects of DA (see Fig. 2, A–C), but current rundown over time generally worked against the recovery of current amplitudes to levels recorded before DA application. Comparing the current profiles of control (untreated) cells and cells treated with DA revealed significant treatment-related differences between these two groups (Fig. 2D; ANOVA, F = 5.38, P = 0.028). Immediately after DA treatment, the mean amplitude of outward currents in DA-treated cells (measured 105 ms after the onset of a voltage step from –70 to +50 mV) was significantly lower than in untreated cells (Student's t-test, t = 3.07, P = 0.009, significance at P < 0.013 after Bonferroni's correction for 4 pairwise comparisons). After 2- to 6-min washing in DA-free saline, however, differences between the two groups of cells were no longer statistically significant.
|
A-type K+ currents (IA). Outward currents modulated by DA were examined more closely in type 1 cells. Type 1 cells express a prominent, rapidly activating, transient A-type current, IA (Fig. 3A). To assess the effects of DA on the amplitude of this current, IA was isolated and identified in 11 type 1 cells. A series of 10-mV voltage steps from –100 to +90 mV were used to compare peak IA recorded before DA application with peak current amplitudes recorded in the presence of DA [5 x 10–5 (n = 3) or 5 x 10–4 M (n = 8), data pooled for analysis; Fig. 3, B and C]. IA amplitude remained stable over time and was not affected by treatment with DA (Fig. 3C; ANOVA, F = 0.82, P = 0.451).
|
|
|
Ca2+-dependent currents in type 1 neurons were identified using Ca2+-free saline (Fig. 5). The amplitude of outward currents in the cells was dramatically reduced under these conditions (Fig. 5, Ai and Aii). Subtracting currents recorded in Ca2+-free saline (Fig. 5Aii) from those recorded in the same cells under normal AIS (Fig. 5Ai) revealed that exposure to Ca2+-free saline abolished a rapidly activating transient component as well as a sustained outward current in type 1 cells (Fig. 5Aiii). Analysis of the Ca2+-sensitive currents (Fig. 5Aiii) suggested that the two components share a similar activation threshold (around –20 mV; Fig. 5C). To explore the possibility that these Ca2+-dependent K+ currents may be targets of DA modulation, we compared the modulatory actions of DA (5 x 10–5 M) with those of CTX (2 x 10–8 M; Fig. 6), a potent IKCa channel blocker (Garcia et al. 1995). When bath-applied for 2–4 min immediately after a baseline recording, the effects of CTX (Fig. 6, Ai and Aii) were strikingly similar to the effects of DA (Fig. 6, Bi and Bii). Like DA (Fig. 6Biii), CTX blocked a rapidly activating transient outward current in type 1 AL neurons (IKCa transient) with a time to peak current (using a depolarizing voltage step from –70 to +20 mV) of 2.76 ± 0.16 ms (n = 14), as well as a slowly activating, sustained current (IKCa sustained) that increased in amplitude throughout the 120-ms voltage step (Fig. 6Aiii). Exposing cells to CTX at a concentration of 2 x 10–8 M had a greater impact on the amplitude of these currents than 5 x 10–5 M DA, suggesting that CTX is a more potent inhibitor of calcium-dependent K+ channels in these cells than DA. Nonetheless, the kinetics of the currents blocked by CTX closely resembled those of the DA-sensitive currents described above. I/V curves generated from the CTX- and DA-sensitive currents (Fig. 6, Aiii and Biii, respectively) show that CTX-sensitive currents, like those modulated by DA, exhibit an activation threshold around –20 mV (Fig. 6, Aiv and Biv, respectively). The I/V curves reveal also that transient currents blocked by DA and CTX exhibit a more strongly nonlinear I/V relationship than sustained currents (Fig. 6, Aiv and Biv), suggesting that IKCa transient and IKCa sustained differ in their relative Ca2+ and voltage sensitivities.
|
10 min in total) produced effects on outward current amplitude similar to those of Ca2+-free saline (cf. Figs. 5Aii and 6Ci). Brief pulses of DA applied to CTX-treated cells had no effect on the amplitude of outward currents in the cells (Fig. 6Cii). Measurements of current amplitude taken 105 ms after the onset of a voltage step from –70 to +50 mV (Fig. 6Ciii) showed very little run-down in current amplitude over time in CTX-treated cells and no significant difference between control cells treated with CTX alone and cells treated with CTX plus DA (ANOVA, F = 0.19, P = 0.668). Taken together, these results suggest that Ca2+-dependent K+ currents in type 1 AL neurons are the targets of DA modulation. One alternative possibility, however, is that these currents may be blocked indirectly through DA modulation of Ca2+ currents in the cells. DA MODULATION OF ICA. To explore the possibility that DA affects Ca2+-dependent K+ currents indirectly through modulation of ICa, we examined the effects of DA on isolated Ca2+ currents in type 1 cells (Fig. 7). Eight cells were exposed to DA (5–15 x 10–5 M, pooled for statistical analysis) and 10 (untreated) cells served as controls. The Ca2+ currents in these cells reached maximum amplitude within 30 ms of the onset of a depolarizing voltage step and declined over the remainder of the voltage pulse (Fig. 7A). Whether or not cells were exposed to DA, ICa activated between –50 and –40 mV, peaked around –10 mV, and reversed at approximately +45 mV (Fig. 7B). In all cells, there was a decrease in ICa amplitude over time (Fig. 7C). However, there was no significant difference in normalized ICa amplitudes between DA-treated cells and controls (ANOVA, F = 0.68, P = 0.797).
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
While the identity of cells responsive to DA has yet to be clearly established, our results suggest that type 1 cells are likely to represent a subpopulation of local AL interneurons (LNs). In the ALs of the bee, there are significantly more LNs than projection (output) neurons (PNs). Estimates of 4,000 LNs per lobe (Witthöft 1967) and 800 PNs (Bicker et al. 1993) have been reported. That a majority of the cells in vitro exhibited type 1 current profiles suggests therefore that type 1 cells are more likely to be LNs than PNs. Examination of the electrophysiological properties of the cells supports this view. Outward current profiles exhibited by type 1 cells are markedly different from those reported for PNs (Grünewald 2003), which instead resemble current profiles observed in this study in cells of type 2.
Type 1 AL neurons, in contrast to type 2 cells (and PNs, Grünewald 2003), express a prominent A-type current. Our results show clearly that IA remains intact in the presence of DA, and the kinetics of the DA-sensitive currents identified in type 1 cells suggest indirectly that the delayed rectifier-like current, IKV, is also unaffected by the presence of this amine. In contrast, IKCa transient and IKCa sustained both seem to be direct targets of DA modulation. The kinetic properties of the two DA-sensitive currents closely resemble those of IKCa transient and IKCa sustained, and effects of DA on type 1 cells are mimicked by the IKCa blocker, CTX. That no detectable DA modulation was observed in cells in which IKCa had been blocked with CTX before DA application provides strong support for the conclusion that DA modulates Ca2+-dependent K+ currents in these neurons.
Ca2+-dependent K+ currents have been described in many insect species (Grolleau and Lapied 1995; Mercer and Hildebrand 2002b; Schäfer et al. 1994; Thomas 1984; Torkkeli and French 1995; Wegener et al. 1992; Zufall et al. 1991). Transient and sustained components of IKCa have been reported, for example, in cockroach dorsal unpaired median neurons and, as in type 1 cells, both currents are blocked by CTX (Grolleau and Lapied 1995). The gene encoding the sustained IKCa channel in cockroach neurons has been identified (Derst et al. 2003) and in cells heterologously expressing this channel, sustained IKCa has an activation rate similar to that of the DA-sensitive sustained current observed in honey bee AL neurons.
Reports describing the outcome of IKCa modulation in other invertebrate systems provide clues as to likely effects of DA modulation of Ca2+-activated K+ currents on the excitability of Apis AL neurons. In molluscan central pattern generator neurons, serotonin-induced attenuation of spike afterhyperpolarization, attributed to a reduction in IKCa amplitude, promotes repetitive spiking in these neurons (Katz and Frost 1997). Applying DA to isolated pyloric dilator neurons in the lobster stomatogastric ganglion, on the other hand, increases the amplitude of total IKCa contributing to an increase in interspike interval and a reduction in action potential frequency in these neurons (Kloppenburg et al. 1999c). These results, together with reports in other systems (e.g., Baxter and Byrne 1989; Baxter et al. 1999; Buchholtz et al. 1992), suggest that DA-induced attenuation of IKCa will increase the excitability of honey bee AL neurons.
In developing nervous systems, levels of electrical activity have a significant impact on neuronal growth and differentiation (e.g., Baines et al. 2001; Duch and Levine 2000, 2002; Gu and Spitzer 1980; Kater and Mills 1991; Kater et al. 1988; Schilling et al. 1991; Spitzer et al. 1995, 2002) and on activity-dependent tuning of neuronal connections (e.g., Katz and Shatz 1996; Ruthazer and Stryker 1996; Shatz 1994; Sherrard and Bower 1998). DA-induced changes in cell excitability therefore could have developmental relevance in ALs of the bee. The early appearance of DA-immunoreactive processes in honey bee ALs (Kirchhof et al. 1999), evidence that DA-receptor genes in the bee brain are strongly developmentally regulated (Kurshan et al. 2003), and the identification in this study of DA-sensitive currents in developing AL neurons all suggest a developmental role for DA, in addition to its functions in the adult brain. In ALs of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta, modulatory actions of serotonin on developing AL neurons (Mercer and Hildebrand 2002a; Mercer et al. 1995, 1996a,b; Oland et al. 1995) strongly foreshadow the actions of this amine in the brain of the adult moth (Kloppenburg and Heinbockel 2000; Kloppenburg and Hildebrand 1995; Kloppenburg et al. 1999a).
In adult honey bees, olfactory information is encoded by spiking patterns in AL projection neurons (Abel et al. 2001; Müller et al. 2002; Stopfer et al. 1997) and patterns of activity across the glomerular array (Galizia et al. 1999; Sachse et al. 1999). Both are likely to be affected by DA-induced changes in the activity of local AL interneurons and/or projection neurons. DA has the potential therefore to influence the detection and discrimination of odors and perhaps also olfactory learning and the formation of odotopic memories. An early investigation of DA function in honey bee ALs showed that DA applied to the lobes reduces the percentage of animals that respond to a conditioned olfactory stimulus (Macmillan and Mercer 1987). One possible target of DA modulation is the subpopulation of LNs that contain the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. Approximately 750 of the 4,000 LNs in the honey bee ALs are GABA immunoreactive (Schäfer and Bicker 1986; Witthöft 1967), and there is compelling evidence that these neurons play a role in AL functions such as odor discrimination (Sachse and Galizia 2002; Stopfer et al. 1997). However, DA may not target GABAergic pathways alone. In the vertebrate olfactory bulb, for example, DA not only regulates GABAergic inhibitory processing (Brünig et al. 1999; Davison et al. 2004; Duchamp-Viret et al. 1997), but also controls sensory input to the olfactory bulb through a presynaptic action on olfactory nerve terminals (Berkowicz and Trombly 2000; Ennis et al. 2001; Hsia et al. 1999; see also Duchamp-Viret et al. 1997). DA is likely to act at multiple sites also in primary olfactory centers of the honey bee brain. At least two DA receptor genes are expressed by deutocerebral neurons that surround the ALs (Kurshan et al. 2003; see also Kokay et al. 1998), and in this study, not only type 1 cells, but also a small number of type 2 AL neurons, responded to this amine.
While the mechanisms through which DA operates in the ALs have yet to be fully resolved, the results of this study provide an important step toward this goal. The aim of future studies will be to determine the functional consequences of DA modulation of Ca2+-activated K+ currents, both in the developing ALs and in AL neurons of the adult worker bee.
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. R. Mercer, Dept. of Zoology, 340 Great King St., Dunedin, New Zealand (E-mail: alison.mercer{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz)
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Armstrong CM and Bezanilla F. Charge movement associated with the opening and closing of the activation gates of the Na channels. J Gen Physiol 63: 533–552, 1974.
Baines RA, Uhler JP, Thompson A, Sweeney ST, and Bate M. Altered electrical properties in Drosophila neurons developing without synaptic transmission. J Neurosci 21: 1523–1531, 2001.
Baxter DA and Byrne JH. Serotonergic modulation of two potassium currents in the pleural sensory neurons of Aplysia. J Neurophysiol 62: 665–679, 1989.
Baxter DA, Canavier CC, Clark JW, and Byrne JH. Computational model of the serotonergic modulation of sensory neurons in Aplysia. J Neurophysiol 82: 2914–2935, 1999.
Beggs KT, Hamilton IS, Kurshan PT, Mustard JA, and Mercer AR. Characterization of a D2-like dopamine receptor (AmDOP3) in honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 35: 873–882, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Berkowicz DA and Trombly PQ. Dopaminergic modulation at the olfactory nerve synapse. Brain Res 855: 90–99, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bicker G, Kreissl S, and Hofbauer A. Monoclonal antibody labels olfactory and visual pathways in Drosophila and Apis brains. J Comp Neurol 335: 413–424, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bicker G and Menzel R. Chemical codes for the control of behaviour in arthropods. Nature 337: 33–39, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
Blenau W, Erber J, and Baumann A. Characterization of a dopamine D1 receptor from Apis mellifera: cloning, functional expression, pharmacology, and mRNA localization in the brain. J Neurochem 70: 15–23, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
Boeckh J and Tolbert LP. Synaptic organisation and development of the antennal lobe in insects. Microsc Res Tech 24: 260–280, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Brünig I, Sommer M, Hatt H, and Bormann J. Dopamine receptor subtypes modulate olfactory bulb 
-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 2456–2460, 1999.
Buchholtz F, Golowasch J, Epstein IR, and Marder E. Mathematical model of an identified stomatogastric ganglion neuron. J Neurophysiol 67: 332–340, 1992.
Christensen TC and Hildebrand JG. Functions, organization and physiology of the olfactory pathways in the lepidopteran brain. In: Arthropod Brain: Its Evolution, Development, Structure and Functions, edited by Gupta AP. New York: Wiley, 1987, p. 457–484.
Davison IG, Boyd JD, and Delaney KR. Dopamine inhibits mitral/tufted –granule cell synapses in the frog olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 24: 8057–8067, 2004.
Derst C, Messutat S, Walther C, Eckert M, Heinemann SH, and Wicher D. The large conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channel (pSlo) of the cockroach Periplaneta americana: structure, localization in neurons and electrophysiology. Eur J Neurosci 17: 1197–1212, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Duch C and Levine RB. Remodeling of membrane properties and dendritic architecture accompanies the postembryonic conversion of a slow into a fast motoneuron. J Neurosci 20: 6950–6961, 2000.
Duch C and Levine RB. Changes in calcium signaling during postembryonic dendritic growth in Manduca sexta. J Neurophysiol 87: 1415–1425, 2002.
Duchamp-Viret P, Coronas V, Delaleu J-C, Moyse E, and Duchamp A. Dopaminergic modulation of mitral cell activity in the frog olfactory bulb: a combined radioligand binding-electrophysiological study. Neuroscience 79: 203–216, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ennis M, Zhou F-M, Ciombor KJ, Aroniadou-Anderjaska V, Hayar A, Borrelli E, Zimmer LA, Margolis F, and Shipley MT. Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition of olfactory nerve terminals. J Neurophysiol 86: 2986–2997, 2001.
Flanagan D and Mercer AR. Morphology and response characteristics of neurones in the deutocerebrum of the brain of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol 164: 483–494, 1989.[CrossRef]
Fonta C, Sun XJ, and Masson C. Morphology and response characteristics of neurons in the deutocerebrum of the brain in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Chem Senses 18: 101–119, 1993.
Galizia CG, Sachse S, Rappert A, and Menzel R. The glomerular code for odor representation is species specific in the honey bee Apis mellifera. Nat Neurosci 2: 473–478, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Garcia ML, Knaus HG, Munujos P, Slaughter RS, and Kaczorowski GJ. Charybdotoxin and its effects on potassium channels. Am J Physiol 269: C1–C10, 1995.
Grolleau F and Lapied B. Separation and identification of multiple potassium currents regulating the pacemaker activity of insect neurosecretory cells (DUM neurons). J Neurophysiol 73: 160–171, 1995.
Grünewald B. Differential expression of voltage-sensitive K+ and Ca2+ currents in neurons of the honey bee olfactory pathway. J Exp Biol 206: 117–129, 2003.
Gu X and Spitzer NC. Distinct aspects of neuronal differentiation encoded by frequency of spontaneous calcium transients. Nature 375: 784–787, 1980.
Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, and Sigworth RF. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cell-free membrane patches. Pfluegers 391: 85–100, 1981.
Hammer M. An identified neuron mediates the unconditioned stimulus in associative learning in honey bees. Nature 366: 59–63, 1993.[CrossRef]
Hansson BS and Anton S. Function and morphology of the antennal lobe: new developments. Annu Rev Entomol 45: 203–231, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Homberg U. Processing of antennal information in extrinsic mushroom body neurons of the bee brain. J Comp Physiol [A] 54: 825–836, 1984.[CrossRef]
Hsia AY, Vincent J-D, and Lledo P-M. Dopamine depresses synaptic inputs into the olfactory bulb. J Neurophysiol 82: 1082–1085, 1999.
Humphries MA, Mustard JA, Hunter SJ, Mercer AR, Ward V, and Ebert PR. Invertebrate D2 type dopamine receptor exhibits age-based plasticity of expression in mushroom bodies of the honey bee brain. J Neurobiol 55: 315–330, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jay SC. Colour changes in honey bee pupae. Bee World 43: 119–122, 1962.
Joerges J, Küttner A, Galizia CG, and Menzel R. Representations of odours and odour mixtures visualized in the honey bee brain. Nature 387: 285–288, 1997.
Kater SB, Mattson MP, Cohan C, and Connor J. Calcium regulation of neuronal growth cones. Trends Neurosci 11: 315–321, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kater SB and Mills LR. Regulation of growth cone behavior by calcium. J Neurosci 11: 891–899, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
Katz LC and Shatz CJ. Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274: 1133–1138, 1996.
Katz PS and Frost WN. Removal of spike frequency adaptation via neuromodulation intrinsic to the Tritonia escape swim central pattern generator. J Neurosci 17: 7703–7713, 1997.
Kirchhof BS, Homberg U, and Mercer AR. Development of dopamine-immunoreactive neurons associated with the antennal lobes of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol 411: 643–653, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kirchhof BS and Mercer AR. Antennal-lobe neurons of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, express a D2-like dopamine receptor in vitro. J Comp Neurol 383: 189–198, 1997.
Kloppenburg P, Ferns D, and Mercer AR. Serotonin enhances central olfactory neuron responses to female sex pheromone in the male sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J Neurosci 19: 8172–8181, 1999a.
Kloppenburg P and Heinbockel T. 5-Hydroxytryptamine modulates pheromone-evoked local field potentials in the macroglomerular complex of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 203: 1701–1709, 2000.[Abstract]
Kloppenburg P and Hildebrand JG. Neuromodulation by 5-hydroxytryptamine in the antennal lobe of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 198: 603–611, 1995.
Kloppenburg P, Kirchhof BS, and Mercer AR. Voltage-activated currents from adult honey bee (Apis mellifera) antennal motoneurons recorded in vitro and in situ. J Neurophysiol 81: 39–48, 1999b.
Kloppenburg P, Levini RM, and Harris-Warrick RM. Dopamine modulates two potassium currents and inhibits the intrinsic firing properties of an identified motor neuron in a central pattern generator network. J Neurophysiol 81: 29–38, 1999c.
Kokay IC, Ebert PR, Kirchhof BS, and Mercer AR. Distribution of dopamine receptors and dopamine receptor homologues in the brain of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Microsc Res Tech 44: 179–189, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kokay IC, McEwan J, and Mercer AR. Autoradiographic localisation of [3H]-SCH23390 and [3H]-spiperone binding sites in honey bee brain. J Comp Neurol 394: 29–37, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kokay IC and Mercer AR. Age-related changes in dopamine receptor densities in the brain of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol [A] 181: 415–423, 1997.
Kreissl S and Bicker G. Dissociated neurons of the pupal honey bee brain in cell culture. J Neurocytol 21: 545–556, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kurshan PT, Hamilton IS, Mustard JA, and Mercer AR. Developmental changes in expression patterns of two dopamine receptor genes in mushroom bodies of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol 466: 91–103, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Macmillan CS and Mercer AR. An investigation of the role of dopamine in the antennal lobes of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol [A] 160: 359–366, 1987.
Masson C and Arnold G. Ontogeny, maturation and plasticity of the olfactory system in the worker bee. J Insect Physiol 30: 7–14, 1984.[CrossRef]
Mercer AR, Hayashi JH, and Hildebrand JG. Modulatory effects of serotonin on voltage-activated currents in cultured antennal lobe neurons of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 198: 613–627, 1995.
Mercer AR and Hildebrand JG. Developmental changes in the electrophysiological properties and response characteristics of antennal-lobe neurons in the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. J Neurophysiol 87: 2650–2663, 2002a.
Mercer AR and Hildebrand JG. Developmental changes in the density of voltage-gated and calcium-dependent ionic currents in antennal-lobe neurons of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. J Neurophysiol 87: 2664–2675, 2002b.
Mercer AR, Kirchhof BS, and Hildebrand JG. Enhancement by serotonin of the growth in vitro of antennal lobe neurons of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. J Neurobiol 29: 49–64, 1996a.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mercer AR, Kloppenburg P, and Hildebrand JG. Serotonin-induced changes in the excitability of cultured antennal-lobe neurons of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. J Comp Physiol [A] 178: 21–31, 1996b.
Mercer AR and Menzel R. The effects of biogenic amines on conditioned and unconditioned responses to olfactory stimuli in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol 145: 363–368, 1982.[CrossRef]
Mercer AR, Mobbs PG, Davenport AP, and Evans PD. Biogenic amines in the brain of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Cell Tissue Res 234: 655–677, 1983.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mobbs PG. The brain of the honey bee Apis mellifera. I. The connections and spatial organization of the mushroom bodies. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 298: 309–354, 1982.[CrossRef]
Müller D, Abel R, Brandt R, Zockler M, and Menzel R. Differential parallel processing of olfactory information in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. J Comp Physiol [A] 188: 359–370, 2002.[CrossRef]
Oland LA, Kirschenbaum SR, Pott WM, Mercer AR, and Tolbert LP. Development of an identified serotonergic neuron in the antennal lobe of the moth and effects of reduction in serotonin during construction of olfactory glomeruli. J Neurobiol 28: 248–267, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oland LA and Tolbert LP. Glial patterns during early development of antennal lobes of Manduca sexta: a comparison between normal lobes and lobes deprived of antennal axons. J Comp Neurol 255: 196–207, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Oland LA and Tolbert LP. Multiple factors shape development of olfactory glomeruli: insights from an insect model system. J Neurobiol 30: 92–109, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pareto A. Die zentrale verteilung der fühlerafferenz bei arbeiterinnen der honigbiene, Apis mellifera L. Zeit Zellforsch 131: 109–140, 1972.
Pelz C, Jander J, Rosenboom H, Hammer M, and Menzel R. IA in Kenyon cells of the mushroom body of honey bees resembles shaker currents: kinetics, modulation by K+, and simulation. J Neurophysiol 81: 1749–1759, 1999.
Rospars JP. Structure and development of the insect antennodeutocerebral system. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 17: 243–294, 1988.[CrossRef]
Ruthazer ES and Stryker MP. The role of activity in the development of long-range horizontal connections in area 17 of the ferret. J Neurosci 16: 7253–7269, 1996.
Sachse S and Galizia CG. Role of inhibition for temporal and spatial odor representation in olfactory output neurons: a calcium imaging study. J Neurophysiol 87: 1106–1117, 2002.
Sachse S, Rappert A, and Galizia CG. The spatial representation of chemical structures in the antennal lobe of honey bees: steps towards the olfactory code. Eur J Neurosci 11: 3970–3982, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Salecker I and Boeckh J. Influence of receptor axons on the formation of olfactory glomeruli in a hemimetabolous insect, the cockroach Periplaneta americana. J Comp Neurol 370: 262–279, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schäfer S and Bicker G. Distribution of GABA-like immunoreactivity in the brain of the honey bee. J Comp Neurol 246: 287–300, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schäfer S, and Rehder V. Dopamine-like immunoreactivity in the brain and suboesophageal ganglion of the honey bee. J Comp Neurol 280: 43–58, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schäfer S, Rosenboom H, and Menzel R. Ionic currents of Kenyon cells from the mushroom body of the honey bee. J Neurosci 14: 4600–4612, 1994.[Abstract]
Scheiner R, Plückhahn S, Öney B, Blenau W, and Erber J. Behavioural pharmacology of octopamine, tyramine and dopamine in honey bees. Brain Behav Res 136: 545–553, 2002.
Schilling K, Dickinson MH, Connor JA, and Morgan JI. Electrical activity in cerebellar cultures determines Purkinje cell dendritic growth patterns. Neuron 7: 891–902, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schulz DJ and Robinson GE. Biogenic amines and division of labor in honey bee colonies: behaviorally related changes in the antennal lobes and age-related changes in the mushroom bodies. J Comp Physiol [A] 184: 481–488, 1999.
Shatz CJ. Role for spontaneous activity in the patterning of connections between retina and LGN during visual system development. Int J Dev Neurosci 12: 531–546, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sherrard RM and Bower AJ. Role of afferents in the development and cell survival of the vertebrate nervous system. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 25: 487–495, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
Spitzer NC, Kingston PA, Manning TJ, and Conklin MW. Outside and in: development of neuronal excitability. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12: 315–323, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Spitzer NC, Olson E, and Gu X. Spontaneous calcium transients regulate neuronal plasticity in developing neurons. J Neurobiol 26: 316–324, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Stopfer M, Bhagavan S, Smith BH, and Laurent G. Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390: 70–74, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun XJ, Fonta C, and Masson C. Odour quality processing by bee antennal lobe interneurones. Chem Senses 18: 355–377, 1993.
Suzuki H. Convergence of olfactory inputs from both antennae in the brain of the honey bee. J Exp Biol 62: 11–26, 1975.
Taylor DJ, Robinson GE, Logan BJ, Laverty R, and Mercer AR. Changes in brain amine levels associated with the morphological and behavioural development of the worker honey bee. J Comp Physiol [A] 170: 715–721, 1992.
Thomas MV. Voltage-clamp analysis of a calcium-mediated potassium conductance in cockroach (Periplaneta americana) central neurones. J Physiol 350: 159–178, 1984.
Torkkeli PH and French AS. Slowly inactivating outward currents in a cuticular mechanoreceptor neuron of the cockroach (Periplaneta americana). J Neurophysiol 74: 1200–1211, 1995.
Wegener JW, Tarelius E, and Breer H. Characterization of calcium-dependent potassium channels in antennal receptor neurones of Locusta migratoria. J Insect Physiol 38: 237–248, 1992.[CrossRef]
Wicher D, Walther C, and Wicher C. Non-synaptic ion channels in insects-basic properties of currents and their modulation in neurons and skeletal muscles. Prog Neurobiol 64: 431–525, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Witthöft W. Absolute anzahl und verteilung der zellen im hirn der honigbiene. Z Morph Tiere 61: 160–184, 1967.[CrossRef]
Wüstenberg DG, Boytcheva M, Grünewald B, Byrne JH, and Menzel R. Current- and voltage-clamp recordings and computer simulations of Kenyon cells in the honey bee. J Neurophysiol 92: 2589–2603, 2004.
Zufall F, Stengl M, Franke M, Hildebrand JG, and Hatt H. Ionic currents of cultured olfactory receptor neurons from antennae of male Manduca sexta. J Neurosci 11: 956–965, 1991.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. D. Burrell and K. M. Crisp Serotonergic Modulation of Afterhyperpolarization in a Neuron That Contributes to Learning in the Leech J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 605 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. T. Beggs, K. A. Glendining, N. M. Marechal, V. Vergoz, I. Nakamura, K. N. Slessor, and A. R. Mercer Queen pheromone modulates brain dopamine function in worker honey bees PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2460 - 2464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
in Ai, * in Aii, and 
in Aiii, 10 ms after the onset of each depolarizing voltage pulse. C: I/V relationship of profiles at 
in Ai, 
in Aii, and 
in Aiii, measured 105 ms after the onset of each depolarizing voltage pulse. Effects of DA were partially but not fully reversible. D: effects of DA on mean outward current amplitudes. Voltage steps from a holding potential of –70 to +50 mV were used to compare the mean amplitude (±SE) of outward currents recorded in control (untreated) cells (n = 18) and in cells exposed to 5 x 10–5 M DA (DA-treated, n = 13) over time. Measurements were taken 105 ms after onset of each depolarizing voltage pulse. Current amplitudes for each cell were normalized to the initial value recorded at time 0 (0 min) and expressed as a fraction of that value. In cells receiving DA treatment, DA was applied 2 min after the 1st reading (arrow). Immediately after DA treatment, cells were washed in DA-free saline. Current amplitudes in DA-treated cells are compared with those recorded in control (untreated) cells. Significance of changes in current amplitude within each group was tested using repeated-measures ANOVA. Differences between groups at equivalent time-points were tested post hoc using independent samples Student's t-test. Bonferroni's correction was made for multiple t-tests (n = 4) and significance was accepted at P = 0.013. NS, not significant.
in Aiii).
in Aiii. Sustained component was measured 105 ms after onset of voltage step (