| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; and 2Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Moscow, Russia
Submitted 7 November 2005; accepted in final form 2 January 2006
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; Blitz et al. 1999; Dickinson et al. 1990; Harris-Warrick et al. 1992; Marder and Calabrese 1996; Weimann et al. 1991; Wood et al. 2000). It also includes buccal neural network of gastropod mollusks (Jing and Weiss 2001, 2002; Kupfermann and Weiss 2001; Morton and Chiel 1993). We report here another example of a neural network with two distinct patterns of activity found in the pteropod mollusk Clione limacina. This network demonstrates a radical transformation of activity from the coordinated inhibition between functionally antagonistic motoneurons to their rhythmic co-activation, which presumably occurs during specific "extraction" period of the feeding behavior.
Clione is a highly specialized carnivore, which feeds only on the shelled pteropod mollusks of the genus Limacina and has adapted feeding structures for their capture and extraction (Lalli 1970; Lalli and Gilmer 1989; Wagner 1885). To capture the prey, Clione uses tentacle-like oral appendages, called buccal cones, which surround the Limacina shell and hold it during the subsequent stages of feeding. Protraction and elongation of the buccal cones is a hydraulic phenomenon and is accomplished by squeezing the hemocoelic fluid from the head hemocoel into the central cavities of the cones (Hermans and Satterlie 1992; Lalli and Gilmer 1989). After the prey capture, the buccal cones manipulate the Limacina shell so that its aperture is pressed against the mouth of Clione. Then two other feeding structures, chitinous hooks and the radula, are used to extract the soft body of Limacina from its shell to be swallowed whole ("extraction" period). Rhythmic protraction-retraction movements of the chitinous hooks and the radula are highly coordinated in a constant phase relation (Malyshev and Norekian 2002). This phase-dependent coordination is observed on the behavioral level and recorded on the motoneuronal level with hook protractor neurons always active in the same phase with radula retractor neurons and hook retractor neurons bursting in phase with the radula protractor neurons (Malyshev and Norekian 2002). A large group of electrically coupled cerebral A (Cr-A) motoneurons controls opening of the skin folds and protraction of the buccal cones (Norekian and Satterlie 1993a); "tentacle motoneurons" according to Arshavsky et al. (1993). Another group of motoneurons, cerebral B (Cr-B) cells, controls buccal cone retraction (Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). Because Cr-A and Cr-B neurons control functionally antagonistic movements of the buccal cones, it is not surprising that activation of the Cr-A neurons is usually accompanied by inhibition of the Cr-B neurons (Norekian 1995; Norekian and Satterlie 1993a).
We describe in this study that inhibitory inputs to the Cr-B neurons sometimes disappear, and both Cr-A and Cr-B neurons begin to burst at the same time. These periods of co-activation are frequently grouped into episodes of rhythmic activity that are linked in a constant phase relation to the rhythmic activity of the hooks and the radula. This transition from the usualinhibitory pattern to co-activation is apparently controlled by the activity of two GABAergic Cr-Aint interneurons that are electrically coupled to the Cr-A neurons and represent the source of inhibitory inputs to the Cr-B neurons (Norekian 1999). Normally, these interneurons are active along with the Cr-A neurons and inhibit Cr-B neurons. However, during co-activation Cr-Aint interneurons do not produce spikes, thus allowing Cr-A neuron activation without inhibition of the Cr-B neurons. This transformation of the neural network activity from inhibitory interactions to co-activation presumably occurs during the late "extraction" period of the feeding behavior.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
) filled with 3 M potassium acetate. Electrophysiological signals were amplified, displayed, and recorded using conventional electrophysiological techniques (A-M Systems, intracellular amplifiers; Astro-Med and Gould, physiological recorders). Intracellular stimulation was achieved via an amplifier bridge circuit. Neurons were identified based on their position, activity patterns, interactions with other neurons, and behavioral responses of the head during their stimulation. To test for monosynaptic connections, a high-divalent solution was used (110 mM MgCl2 and 25 mM CaCl2, pH = 7.4; prepared on filtered seawater). In the behavioral experiments, animals were carefully pinned down to a Sylgard-coated petri dish. A Sony video camera was mounted on a dissecting microscope and used for recording feeding movements. Video records from a standard video tape recorder were digitized on the computer using a frame grabber from VideoVision and a Personal AVI Editor program (FlickerFree Multimedia Products). Digitized images were analyzed using video analysis software PhysVis. The anterior tips of hooks or skin folds were monitored, and their movements were plotted as a function of time.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Our investigation in intact animals revealed some new details about the operation of feeding structures during different stages of the Clione feeding behavior. Opening of the skin folds and a complete protraction of the buccal cones was always observed during the initial periods of the feeding behavior—prey capture and subsequent manipulation of the Limacina shell to position the shell aperture against the mouth of Clione (Fig. 1, A and B). The primary role for the fully protracted buccal cones was to seize the actively swimming prey and hold it in a proper position. Then toothed radula and chitinous hooks became actively involved in the extraction of the Limacina body from its shell and were primarily responsible for holding the prey. During this extraction stage, buccal cones appeared to be not so crucial for holding the prey and became partially retracted, while skin folds were still widely open in all observed animals (n = 19 animals; Fig. 1C).
|
). Thus all three major feeding structures demonstrated rhythmic movements during the extraction period of the feeding behavior, which were highly coordinated in a constant phase relation.
|
Two patterns of neural activity
We have previously described that spike activity in the normally silent Cr-A motoneurons, which control opening of the skin folds and protraction of the buccal cones, corresponded with the inhibition of the functionally antagonistic Cr-B motoneurons, which control buccal cone retraction (Fig. 3A) (Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). This correlation between the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons was observed during their spontaneous activity or during intracellular stimulation of the Cr-A motoneurons, which induced polysynaptic inhibitory inputs to the Cr-B neurons (Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). In this study, we have found that inhibitory inputs to the Cr-B neurons sometimes disappear, leading to the completely different pattern of activity that consists of the lasting periods of co-activation of the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons. Such periods of co-activation were sometimes observed during spontaneous activity of the Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons when synchronous excitatory inputs from unidentified source appeared in both types of neurons (n = 12 preparations; Fig. 3B). However, spontaneous spike activity in the normally silent and high-threshold Cr-A neurons was a rare and unpredictable event. More reliably, spike activity in the Cr-A neurons was always triggered by direct stimulation of identified excitatory interneurons. We have found in this study that intracellular stimulation of the Cr-BM interneurons (cerebral neurons triggering Buccal Mass rhythm) induced both patterns of the Cr-A and Cr-B neuron activity. The GABAergic Cr-BM interneurons have been previously shown to produce strong excitatory inputs to the radula and hook controlling neural network and to the Cr-A neurons (Norekian and Malyshev 2005). Our investigation demonstrated that the Cr-BM interneurons activated not only Cr-A neurons but also produced excitatory inputs to the Cr-B neurons (n = 25 preparations; Fig. 4, A and B). In most preparations, stimulation of the Cr-BM interneuron induced a prominent activation of the Cr-A neurons as well as initial activation of the Cr-B neurons that was quickly overrun by inhibitory inputs (n = 16 preparations; Fig. 4A). However, in some preparations we also observed lasting periods of co-activation without any trace of inhibitory inputs in the Cr-B neurons (n = 9 preparations; Fig. 4B). The transition from inhibitory pattern to co-activation and then from co-activation again to the inhibitory interaction was observed several times during the same experiment in some of these preparations (n = 6 preparations; Fig. 4C). This dramatic change from the inhibitory pattern of activity to the co-activation of functionally antagonistic motoneurons was somewhat surprising and triggered our further investigation of its possible role in the feeding behavior and mechanisms of the network reconfiguration, which allowed such a transformation. But first we wanted to know more details about the synaptic inputs to the Cr-B motoneurons produced by the Cr-BM interneurons.
|
|
The excitatory inputs from the Cr-BM interneurons to the Cr-B motoneurons were highly efficient. Nevertheless, they were apparently not monosynaptic—some of the induced Cr-BM neuron spikes failed in high-divalent solution to produce excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in these cells (n = 14 in 7 preparations). The Cr-BM interneurons as well as Cr-B neurons are located in the cerebral ganglia in a close proximity to each other (Norekian 1995; Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). However, in the reduced preparations, which had the buccal ganglia missing, the Cr-BM interneurons did not have any effect on the Cr-B neurons, suggesting that a polysynaptic connection between the Cr-BM interneurons and the Cr-B motoneurons occurred via the buccal ganglia (n = 5 preparations). To confirm this suggestion, we performed the following experiments. In the semi-intact preparations, we recorded several prominent excitatory inputs in the Cr-B neurons triggered by induced bursts of spikes in the Cr-BM interneuron and then cut the ipsilateral cerebro-buccal connective with fine scissors. After the cut, all Cr-BM neuron-induced responses in the Cr-B motoneurons completely disappeared confirming the "buccal ganglia" pathway (n = 5 preparations; Fig. 5 A). We have previously demonstrated that the Cr-BM interneurons activate Cr-A neurons via the Bc-PIN interneuron (Norekian and Malyshev 2005). The Bc-PIN (buccal Protractor Interneuron) is active during radula protraction phase as a part of the radula rhythm generator and sends an axon to the cerebral ganglia producing activation of the Cr-A neurons (Arshavsky et al. 1993). We have shown that the Cr-BM interneurons monosynaptically activate Bc-PIN interneurons, which in turn monosynaptically activate Cr-A neurons (Norekian and Malyshev 2005). It was logical to suggest that the transition of the excitatory inputs from the Cr-BM interneuron to the Cr-B neurons also occurred via the Bc-PIN interneurons. Simultaneous recordings from the Cr-BM neuron, Bc-PIN neuron and Cr-B neurons revealed that the Bc-PIN neuron was always spiking when the Cr-BM interneuron activated Cr-B neurons (n = 12 in 4 preparations). When the Bc-PIN interneurons were hyperpolarized and thus functionally removed from the network functioning, the Cr-B neuron response to the stimulation of the Cr-BM interneurons completely disappeared (n = 5 in 3 preparations; Fig. 5B). Moreover in all our experiments, the Cr-BM neuron-induced EPSPs in the Cr-B neurons appeared only when corresponding spikes were observed in the Bc-PIN interneurons (n = 8 presentations in 4 preparations; Fig. 5C). This provided strong evidence that Bc-PIN interneuron is indeed the element of the neural network that relays the excitatory inputs from the Cr-BM interneuron to the Cr-B neurons. The excitatory inputs from the Bc-PIN interneuron to the Cr-B neurons were apparently monosynaptic. Each induced Bc-PIN neuron spike produced an individual EPSP in the Cr-B neurons, which persisted without failure in high divalent solution (several presentations in each of the n = 6 preparations; Fig. 6A). The response in the Cr-B motoneurons was biphasic and consisted of the fast EPSPs and slow depolarizing potentials (n = 12 preparations; Fig. 6B). The time to peak for the fast EPSPs was 19.9 ± 1.1 ms (n = 11 from 3 preparations), whereas the time to peak for the slow depolarizing potentials was 1.38 ± 0.09 s (n = 7 from 3 preparations). The summation of slow potentials usually resulted in the lasting depolarization wave.
|
|
Based on the results of our investigation, the following synaptic connections have been established in the Clione feeding neural network that controls buccal cone movements (Fig. 7). The Cr-BM interneurons, which are located in the cerebral ganglia, produce monosynaptic excitatory inputs to the Bc-PIN interneurons located in the buccal ganglia. The Bc-PIN interneurons in turn monosynaptically activate both the Cr-A motoneurons, which control opening of the skin folds and protraction of the buccal cones, and the Cr-B motoneurons, which control buccal cone retraction. There is one additional important element in the network—a bilaterally symmetrical cerebral Cr-Aint interneuron, which is electrically coupled to the Cr-A motoneurons and coordinates activity of the contralateral Cr-A motoneurons (Arshavsky et al. 1993; Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). We have previously shown that these GABAergic Cr-Aint interneurons monosynaptically inhibit the Cr-B motoneurons, thus being responsible for the inhibitory influence from the Cr-A motoneurons to the Cr-B motoneurons (Norekian 1999). Induced burst of spikes in the Cr-Aint interneuron always produced a prominent inhibition of the Cr-B motoneurons as well as activation of the Cr-A motoneurons (n = 32 preparations; Fig. 8A). The Cr-Aint interneurons also received monosynaptic excitatory inputs from the Bc-PIN interneurons (n = 9 preparations; Fig. 8B) (Norekian and Malyshev 2005). This position of the Cr-Aint interneurons in the network suggested that they could be the key elements in the network reconfiguration during its transition from the inhibitory pattern to the co-activation pattern. Normally, the Bc-PIN interneurons activated both the Cr-A motoneurons and the Cr-Aint interneurons (n = 34 in 12 preparations; Fig. 8C). The Cr-Aint interneuron activation in turn resulted in the inhibition of the Cr-B motoneurons. However, in the preparations with the stable co-activation pattern, we have found that although the Cr-Aint interneurons received excitatory inputs from the Bc-PIN interneurons, they did not generate action potentials, while Cr-A motoneurons were sufficiently activated (n = 22 in 9 preparations; Fig. 9A). Because there was no spike activity in the Cr-Aint interneurons, the Cr-B motoneurons received only excitatory inputs from the PIN interneurons and did not receive inhibitory inputs from the Cr-Aint interneurons, thus resulting in co-activation of the Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons. In a few preparations that showed a stable co-activation pattern and therefore no spike activity in the Cr-Aint interneurons after stimulation of the Bc-PIN interneurons, we depolarized Cr-Aint interneurons during PIN interneuron stimulation (n = 7 in 4 preparations). Such a depolarization allowed Bc-PIN neuron-induced EPSPs in the Cr-Aint interneurons to reach spike threshold and trigger a burst of action potentials (Fig. 9B). Although the Cr-B motoneurons received excitatory inputs from the Bc-PIN interneurons, their activation was terminated by much stronger inhibition from the Bc-PIN neuron-induced activity of the Cr-Aint interneurons (Fig. 9B). Thus the artificial increase in the excitability of the Cr-Aint interneurons resulted in the restoration of the inhibitory pattern of the Cr-A and Cr-B motoneuron activity.
|
|
|
Stimulation of the Cr-BM or Bc-PIN interneurons frequently induced not only the initial co-activation of the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons but also their lasting, in-phase rhythmic activity (n = 28 in 9 preparations; Fig. 10). This rhythmic activity of the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons lasted for several seconds and was strictly correlated with the rhythmic activity of two other feeding neural networks, which control movements of the hooks and the radula (n = 16 in 7 preparations). We have previously shown that rhythmic movements of the hooks and the radula are highly coordinated in a constant phase relation (Malyshev and Norekian 2002). Hook protraction always coincided with the radula retraction, whereas hook retraction coincided with the radula protraction. The Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons were active in the same phase with the radula protractor and hook retractor neurons and in the opposite phase with the radula retractor and hook protractor neurons (n = 16 preparations; Fig. 11). Whereas the Cr-A motoneurons control opening of the skin folds and protraction of the buccal cones, two buccal motoneurons previously identified as Bc-L neurons (buccal neurons controlling Lips) control closing of the skin folds over the mouth of Clione (Norekian and Malyshev 2005). The Bc-L neurons were found to be also rhythmically active with their rhythm locked in phase with all other rhythmic neural networks of the feeding system. For example, they were always active in the same phase with the radula retractor neurons and in the opposite phase with the radula protractor neurons, such as Bc-PIN interneuron (n = 6 preparations; Fig. 12A). A lasting stimulation of the Cr-BM or Bc-PIN interneurons, which was capable of driving the feeding rhythm in the CNS, induced rhythmic activity in the Bc-L neurons as well as in the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons (n = 6 preparations; Fig. 12B). The Bc-L motoneurons were always active in the opposite phase with the Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons.
|
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
The buccal cones become fully protracted during the initial prey capture stage of the feeding behavior, when they grab and hold the prey, and the following "manipulation" period, when they turn the shell of the prey to bring its aperture against the mouth of Clione (Lalli 1970; Lalli and Gilmer 1989). Then rhythmically active hooks and the radula begin the extraction of the prey from its shell. Clione does not bite small pieces from the prey during feeding but pulls the entire body of the prey from its shell (Lalli 1970; Lalli and Gilmer 1989; Wagner 1885). In a previous study, we described the phase-locked coordination between rhythmic activity of the radula and hooks, which take turns in pulling the prey out of the shell keeping a constant extracting pressure (Malyshev and Norekian 2002). When the radula retracts pulling the prey out of the shell, the hooks become protracted. Then the hooks retract pulling the prey out of the shell, while the radula protracts. We have found in our current investigation that during this extraction period of the feeding behavior, the buccal cones are not fully elongated but partially retracted. Moreover, the skin folds with partially retracted buccal cones become rhythmically active, and their rhythmic activity is locked in phase with the rhythmic movements of the radula and hooks. When the hooks grab the prey tissue and retract to pull it inside the buccal cavity, the skin folds are widely open. When the hooks release the prey and protract, the skin folds with the retracted buccal cones close around the Limacina shell to hold it in place. Thus all three feeding structures become rhythmically active in coordinated manner and participate in the extraction of the prey from its shell.
These behavioral observations demonstrated that there are two distinct patterns of the buccal cone activity during feeding behavior–fully elongated buccal cones during initial period of the feeding behavior and partially retracted rhythmically active buccal cones during the extraction period. On the neuronal level, we have found that the buccal cone controlling neural network is capable of producing two dramatically distinct patterns of activity: inhibitory pattern and co-activation pattern.
A coordinated inhibition of the neural centers underlying incompatible behavioral responses has been described in different animals (Beall et al. 1990; Kovac and Davis 1980; Krasne and Lee 1988; Norekian and Satterlie 1996). Such inhibitory pattern of activity between functionally antagonistic motoneurons was also observed in the Clione feeding neural network (Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). When the Cr-A motoneurons that control opening of the skin folds and buccal cone protraction are active, the Cr-B motoneurons that control buccal cone retraction usually receive strong inhibitory inputs terminating their firing. We have found in this study that inhibitory pattern of activity is not the only motor pattern produced by these functionally antagonistic Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons. The Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons also demonstrate episodes of co-activation without any traces of inhibition in the Cr-B neurons.
We believe that during the initial prey capture and manipulation period of the feeding behavior, the Cr-A and Cr-B neural network produces the inhibitory pattern of activity. This activity pattern corresponds with the opening of the skin folds and the full protraction and elongation of the buccal cones facilitated by the inhibition of all retraction responses. The co-activation pattern of the Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons and the behavioral activity it is expected to produce precisely correspond to the extraction period of the feeding behavior. The Cr-A neuron activation produces opening of the skin folds, while simultaneous activity of the Cr-B neurons would prevent the hydraulic protraction of the buccal cones and would keep them in the retracted position. The initial Cr-A and Cr-B neuron co-activation is frequently followed by their in-phase rhythmic activity. This rhythmic activity lasts for several seconds and is strictly correlated with the rhythmic activity of two other feeding neural networks controlling movements of the hooks and the radula. This is precisely what we observe in our behavioral studies during the extraction period of the feeding behavior—rhythmic activity in all three feeding structures in a strict phase-dependent relation.
The best way to confirm the behavioral role of a specific motor output is to record it in the semi-intact preparation during a particular behavior. The specific features of the Clione preparation currently prevent us from performing such an experiment. One of the main reasons is the fact that the buccal cone protraction, which is required for successful feeding behavior, is a hydraulic phenomenon (Hermans and Satterlie 1992; Lalli and Gilmer 1989). When we dissect the preparation to gain access to neurons for intracellular recording, we compromise the integrity of the central hemocoelic cavity, and the full protraction of the buccal cones becomes impossible along with the clear succession between feeding stages. However, we believe that the direct connection between the activity of individual motoneurons and the behavioral responses that they produce allow us to safely speculate about the possible behavioral role of different patterns of activity of the Cr-A and Cr-B neural network. In the future, we will investigate ways to induce clear and distinct feeding stages in semi-intact preparations designed for intracellular recording and to establish unequivocally the behavioral roles for different activity patterns in the feeding neural network.
Neural mechanisms
The fact that the same neural circuit is capable of generating multiple motor patterns has been documented in a few other systems. For example, the stomatogastric ganglion of decapod crustaceans produces two motor patterns, the gastric mill rhythm and the pyloric rhythm, which can be separately elicited by different modulatory neurons (Blitz and Nusbaum 1997; Blitz et al. 1999; Dickinson et al. 1990; Harris-Warrick et al. 1992; Marder and Calabrese 1996; Meyrand et al. 1994; Tazaki and Tazaki 2000; Weimann et al. 1991; Wood et al. 2000). The buccal feeding neural network of the gastropod mollusks produces distinct ingestion and rejection motor patterns (Jing and Weiss 2001, 2002; Kupfermann and Weiss 2001; Morton and Chiel 1993). The respiratory neural networks in both mice and locust generate multiple breathing patterns (Lieske et al. 2000; Ramirez 1998). The basic mechanism of the transition between different activity patterns in the neural systems described above is a specific reconfiguration of a neural network due to the changes in the properties of individual neurons and synaptic connections between them.
According to our investigation, transition from the inhibitory pattern to co-activation pattern of activity of the functionally antagonistic Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons in Clione was controlled by the activity of a single pair of the Cr-Aint interneurons. The Cr-Aint interneurons were instrumental in conveying inhibitory influence from the Cr-A motoneurons to the Cr-B motoneurons. They were electrically coupled to the Cr-A motoneurons and produced monosynaptic inhibitory inputs to the Cr-B motoneurons, thus inhibiting the Cr-B neuron spontaneous spike activity when the Cr-A neurons were active (Norekian 1999). However, the efficacy of electrical coupling between the Cr-A motoneurons and Cr-Aint interneurons was not so high as to produce strong spike synchrony in these neurons. In addition, the Cr-A and the Cr-B motoneurons did not have direct synaptic connections between them (Norekian and Satterlie 1993a). The indirect nature of the inhibition between the Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons allowed for sufficient flexibility in the network. For example, we have previously described a brief period of activation of both Cr-A and Cr-B neurons followed by a prolonged inhibition of the Cr-B neurons, which was suggested as a mechanism for the high-speed hydraulic protraction of the buccal cones (Norekian and Satterlie 1993b).
Thus when synchronous excitatory inputs arrived to the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons, for example after stimulation of the Bc-PIN interneurons that produced monosynaptic EPSPs in both neuron types, the motor pattern of the network completely depended on the Cr-Aint interneuron activity. When the Cr-Aint interneurons responded with a burst of spikes, their strong inhibitory influence terminated any activity in the Cr-B motoneurons and therefore resulted in the inhibitory pattern of the Cr-A and Cr-B neuron activity. When excitatory inputs did not bring the Cr-Aint interneurons to their spike threshold but activated Cr-A motoneurons, inhibitory inputs from the Cr-Aint interneurons did not materialize resulting in co-activation of the functionally antagonistic Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons. A somewhat similar mechanism has been proposed for the swim pattern-generating neural network in the mollusk Tritonia (Getting and Dekin 1985). The dorsal swim interneurons demonstrated reciprocal inhibition in a quiescent preparation but were also known to have a reciprocal excitatory connection during swimming. The authors hypothesized that transition from inhibition to excitation occurred due to the inhibition of some unidentified inhibitory interneuron in the network.
The main goal for our future investigation will be to identify specific modulatory processes that regulate the Cr-Aint interneuron excitability and therefore the resulting motor pattern of the buccal cone controlling neural network. We also plan to investigate the specific sensory pathways to the buccal cone neural network. The synchronous excitatory inputs to the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons were required to produce co-activation pattern. Occasionally, we saw spontaneous excitatory inputs. However, the most reliable source of such inputs for our experimental manipulations was Bc-PIN interneuron. We believe that the Cr-BM and Bc-PIN interneurons provide one (but certainly not the only) pathway for such synchronous inputs during natural feeding behavior. We also suggest that interneuronal pathway for the sensory inputs from the prey could be different during different stages of feeding. For example, synchronous excitatory inputs to the Cr-A and Cr-B neurons occur only during the extraction stage of the feeding behavior when co-activation pattern is presumably required.
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. P. Norekian, Arizona State University, School of Life Sciences, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 (E-mail: Tigran.Norekian{at}asu.edu)
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Beall SP, Langley DJ, and Edwards DH. Inhibition of escape tailflip in crayfish during backward walking and the defense posture. J Exp Biol 152: 577–582, 1990.
Blitz DM, Christie AE, Coleman MJ, Norris BJ, Marder E, and Nusbaum MP. Different proctolin neurons elicit distinct motor patterns from a multifunctional neuronal network. J Neurosci 19: 5449–5463, 1999.
Blitz DM and Nusbaum MP. Motor pattern selection via inhibition of parallel pathways. J Neurosci 17: 4965–4975, 1997.
Dickinson PS, Mecsas C, and Marder E. Neuropeptide fusion of two motor pattern generator circuits. Nature 334: 155–158, 1990.
Getting PA and Dekin MS. Mechanisms of pattern generation underlying swimming in Tritonia. IV. Gating of central pattern generator. J Neurophysiol 53: 466–480, 1985.
Harris-Warrick RM, Marder E, Selverston A, and Moulins M. (Editors). Dynamic Biological Networks: The Stomatogastric Nervous System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
Hermans CO and Satterlie RA. Fast-strike feeding behavior in a pteropod mollusk, Clione limacina Phipps. Biol Bull 182: 1–7, 1992.[Abstract]
Jing J and Weiss KR. Neural mechanisms of motor program switching in Aplysia. J Neurosci 21: 7349–7362, 2001.
Jing J and Weiss KR. Interneuronal basis of the generation of related but distinct motor programs in Aplysia: implications for current neuronal models of vertebrate intralimb coordination. J Neurosci 22: 6228–6238, 2002.
Kovac MP and Davis WJ. Neural mechanism underlying behavioral choice in Pleurobranchaea. J Neurophysiol 43: 469–487, 1980.
Krasne FB and Lee SC. Response-dedicated trigger neurons as control points for behavioral actions: selective inhibition of lateral giant command neurons during feeding in crayfish. J Neurosci 8: 3703–3712, 1988.[Abstract]
Kupfermann I and Weiss KR. Motor program selection in simple model systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 673–677, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lalli CM. Structure and function of the buccal apparatus of Clione limacina (Phipps) with a review of feeding in Gymnosomatous pteropods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 4: 101–118, 1970.
Lalli CM and Gilmer RW. Pelagic Snails: The Biology of Holoplanktonic Gastropod Mollusks. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1989.
Lieske SP, Thoby-Brisson M, Telgkamp P, and Ramirez JM. Reconfiguration of the neural network controlling multiple breathing patterns: eupnea, sighs and gasps. Nat Neurosci 3: 600–607, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Malyshev AY and Norekian TP. Phase-Locked coordination between two rhythmically active feeding structures in the carnivorous mollusk Clione limacina. I. Motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 87: 2996–3005, 2002.
Marder E and Calabrese RL. Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation. Physiol Rev 76: 687–717, 1996.
Meyrand P, Simmers J, and Moulins M. Dynamic construction of a neural network from multiple pattern generators in the lobster stomatogastric nervous system. J Neurosci 14: 630–644, 1994.[Abstract]
Morton DW and Chiel HJ. The timing of activity in motor neurons that produce radula movements distinguishes ingestion from rejection in Aplysia. J Comp Physiol 173: 519–536, 1993.
Norekian TP. Prey capture phase of feeding behavior in the pteropod mollusk, Clione limacina: neuronal mechanisms. J Comp Physiol 177: 41–53, 1995.
Norekian TP. GABAergic excitatory synapses and electrical coupling sustain prolonged discharges in a prey capture neural network of Clione limacina. J Neurosci 19: 1863–1875, 1999.
Norekian TP and Malyshev AY. Coordinated excitatory effect of GABAergic interneurons on three feeding motor programs in the mollusk Clione limacina. J Neurophysiol 93: 305–315, 2005.
Norekian TP and Satterlie RA. Cerebral neurons underlying prey capture movements in the pteropod mollusc, Clione limacina. I.Physiology, morphology. J Comp Physiol 172: 153–169, 1993a.
Norekian TP and Satterlie RA. Co-activation of antagonistic motoneurons as a mechanism of high-speed hydraulic inflation of prey capture appendages in the pteropod mollusk, Clione limacina. Biol Bull 185: 240–247, 1993b.[Abstract]
Norekian TP and Satterlie RA. Whole body withdrawal circuit and its involvement in the behavioral hierarchy of the mollusk Clione limacina. J Neurophysiol 75: 529–537, 1996.
Ramirez JM. Reconfiguration of the respiratory network at the onset of locust flight. J Neurophysiol 80: 3137–3147, 1998.
Tazaki K and Tazaki Y. Multiple motor patterns in the stomatogastric ganglion of the shrimp Penaeus japonicus. J Comp Physiol [A] 186: 105–118, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wagner N. Die Wirbellosen des Weissen Meeres: Zoologische Forschungen an der Kuste des Solowetzkischen Meerbusens in den Sommermonaten der Jahre. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag Von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1885.
Weimann JM, Meyrand P, and Marder E. Neurons that form multiple pattern generators: identification and multiple activity patterns of gastric/pyloric neurons in the crab stomatogastric system. J Neurophysiol 65: 111–122, 1991.
Wood DE, Stein W, and Nusbaum MP. Projection neurons with shared cotransmitters elicit different motor patterns from the same neural circuit. J Neurosci 20: 8943–8953, 2000.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
). B: induced burst of spikes in the Cr-BM interneuron triggered strong excitatory response both in the Bc-PIN interneuron and Cr-B1 motoneuron. Hyperpolarization of the Bc-PIN neuron eliminated any response in the Cr-B1 neuron to the similar induced burst of spikes in the Cr-BM interneuron. Note that there was no change in the Cr-B neuron membrane potential during the Bc-PIN neuron hyperpolarization. C: induced burst of spikes in the Cr-BM interneuron produced polysynaptic EPSPs; (*) in the Cr-B1 neuron. These EPSPs in the Cr-B1 neuron appeared only when the Cr-BM neuron-induced monosynaptic EPSPs in the Bc-PIN interneuron reached spike threshold and generated action potentials.
12 bilaterally symmetrical cells. All Cr-A motoneurons and Cr-Aint interneurons are electrically coupled. The Bc-PIN interneurons also produce monosynaptic excitatory inputs to the Cr-B motoneurons, which control buccal cone retraction. There are 2 pairs of the Cr-B motoneurons. The Cr-Aint interneurons monosynaptically inhibit the Cr-B motoneurons. Note that Cr-A and Cr-B motoneurons do not have direct connections. 
, synaptic excitatory connections; 
, inhibitory connections.
