JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 2878-2888, 2006. First published January 25, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01352.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/2878    most recent
01352.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCobb, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCobb, D. P.

beta2 and beta4 Subunits of BK Channels Confer Differential Sensitivity to Acute Modulation by Steroid Hormones

J. T. King1, P. V. Lovell1, M. Rishniw2, M. I. Kotlikoff2, M. L. Zeeman3 and D. P. McCobb1

1Department of Neurobiology and Behavior and 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York: and 3Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas

Submitted 22 December 2005; accepted in final form 24 January 2006


 ABSTRACT
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Membrane-associated receptors for rapid, steroidal neuromodulation remain elusive. Estradiol has been reported to facilitate activation of voltage- and Ca2+-dependent BK potassium channels encoded by Slo, if associated with beta1 subunits. We show here that 1) multiple members of the beta family confer sensitivity to multiple steroids on BK channels, 2) that beta subunits differentiate between steroids, and 3) that different betas have distinct relative preferences for particular steroids. Expressed in HEK 293 cells, inside-out patches with channels composed of Slo-{alpha} alone showed no steroid sensitivity. Cells expressing {alpha}beta4 exhibited potent, rapid, reversible, and dose-dependent potentiation by corticosterone (CORT; a glucocorticoid), and were potentiated to a lesser degree by other sex and stress steroids. In contrast, {alpha}beta2 channels were potentiated more strongly by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA; an enigmatic, stress-related adrenal androgen), and to a lesser extent by CORT, estradiol, testosterone, and DHEA-S. Cholesterol had no effect on any BK channel compositions tested. Conductance–voltage plots of channels composed of {alpha} plus beta2 or beta4 subunits were shifted in the negative direction by steroids, indicating greater activation at negative voltages. Thus our results argue that the variety of Slo-beta subunit coexpression patterns occurring in vivo expands the repertoire of Slo channel gating in yet another dimension not fully appreciated, rendering BK gating responsive to dynamic fluctuations in a multiple of steroid hormones.


 INTRODUCTION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
While some immediate, nongenomic effects of steroids on electrophysiological function have been known for 50 years, many rapid effects are still being discovered as potential players are identified and characterized (Falkenstein et al. 2000Go; Makara and Haller 2001Go; Wehling 1997Go). Ion channels, G protein–coupled receptors, phospholipases, and protein kinases are modulated acutely, but primary receptors and transducing intermediates are mostly unknown.

Big-conductance calcium- and voltage-activated potassium (BK) channels are prominent in nerve, muscle, endocrine, and exocrine cells. Their functions vary widely with context. In smooth muscle they counteract depolarization and contraction. In presynaptic nerve terminals, they can limit secretion by speeding rapid repolarization. Rapid repolarization and brief afterhyperpolarization mediated by BK current can increase or decrease neuronal repetitive firing rates. These channels can also make interesting and sometimes paradoxical contributions to firing patterns, affecting threshold, spike frequency adaptation, and burst firing patterns (Brayden and Nelson 1992Go; Fettiplace and Fuchs 1999Go; Jin et al. 2000Go; Lingle et al. 1996Go; McCobb 2004Go; Van Goor et al. 2001Go; Vergara et al. 1998Go). BK channels have a pore formed from a tetramer of {alpha}-subunits encoded by the Slo gene. beta subunits encoded by at least four related genes differentially co-occur with Slo and have distinctive and sometimes dramatic effects on channel gating (Orio et al. 2002Go). beta1, prominent in smooth muscle, shifts BK activation to more negative voltages for a given Ca2+ concentration, while slowing activation (Dworetzky et al. 1996Go; McManus et al. 1995Go). beta2 negatively shifts activation, but also confers rapid inactivation through a "ball-and-chain" mechanism (Uebele et al. 2000Go; Wallner et al. 1999Go; Xia et al. 1999Go). One splice variant of beta3 confers extremely rapid but incomplete inactivation (Xia et al. 2000Go). beta4, prevalent in brain, increases the steepness of Ca2+ sensitivity and dramatically slows activation and deactivation kinetics (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Brenner et al. 2000Go). Temporal lobe seizures reported in beta4 knockout mice show that beta4's effects are critical for damping excessive firing frequencies in granule cells of the dentate gyrus (Brenner et al. 2005Go).

Several steroids modulate BK channels. Estradiol, testosterone, and bile salts, (steroidal anions) can relax smooth muscle by potentiating BK channels (Deenadayalu et al. 2001Go; Dopico et al. 2002Go; Rosenfeld et al. 2001Go; Salom et al. 2002Go). We have recently shown that adrenal glucocorticoids cortisol and corticosterone (together abbreviated CORT), and their synthetic analog dexamethasone, facilitate BK activation in adrenal chromaffin cells, promoting rapid action potential repolarization, repetitive firing, and presumably augmenting catecholamine secretion under stress (Lovell et al. 2004Go). Similar effects of CORT on pituitary corticotrope- and somatotrope-like cell lines have also been reported (Huang et al. 2005Go). Whether CORT modulates BK channels in hippocampus, pituitary, or other native tissues controlling stress responses is not yet known.

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is another steroid that has been proposed to regulate BK channels in vivo. DHEA, with its sulfated form DHEA-S, is the most abundant, but perhaps least understood, steroid hormone. Produced in the adrenal cortex and elsewhere, including the brain, serum DHEA levels are increased by stress in humans (Kroboth et al. 1999Go; Oberbeck et al. 1998Go; Zinder and Dar 1999Go). An age-related decline inserum levels has prompted widespread therapeutic use, despite very limited understanding of its natural role(s) or mechanisms of action (Allolio and Arlt 2002Go; Vermeulen 1995Go; Wolkowitz et al. 1997Go). There is evidence for neuroprotective effects of DHEA in hippocampus (Bastianetto et al. 1999Go; Kimonides et al. 1998Go). DHEA or DHEA-S modulates CNS GABAA receptors and calcium channels (Ffrench-Mullen and Spence 1991Go; Majewska et al. 1990Go). Importantly, BK channel activation in pulmonary vascular smooth muscle is acutely potentiated by DHEA, reducing vasoconstriction under hypoxia (Farrukh et al. 1998Go; Peng et al. 1999Go).

Coexpression of beta1 and Slo in Xenopus oocytes or HEK-293 cells confers both estradiol binding and channel facilitation (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Valverde et al. 1999Go). The response mimics that of BK channels in vascular smooth muscle cells. Here we test the possibility that other related beta subunits mediate modulation of BK channels by other steroids. We report that beta4, prominent in hippocampus and other brain regions (Brenner et al. 2000Go), confers particular sensitivity to CORT. On the other hand, inactivation-conferring beta2, expressed in lung, adrenal medulla, and brain, confers preferential sensitivity to DHEA. We submit that distinct, multisteroidal interaction profiles add another nuance to beta subunit-related diversification of BK channel function in vivo.


 METHODS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Plasmid constructs and expression

A human BK channel {alpha}-subunit cDNA (hSlo; accession no. U13913) was excised as a HindIII-SalI fragment and cloned into the expression vector pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen) under the control of a cytomegalovirus promoter. The human BK channel beta1 subunit cDNA (accession no. NM004137) was excised with BamHI, and NotI and subcloned into pcDNA3.1. The human beta2 subunit cDNA (American Type Culture Collection; accession no. AF099137) was excised with HindIII and XhoI and subcloned into pcDNA3.1. beta2NI, a noninactivating beta2 mutant lacking the inactivation-conferring amino terminal residues FIW in positions 2–4 (Xia et al. 2003Go), was created by incorporating a HindIII site followed by an intial methionine and residues 5–9 into the forward primer, and XhoI in the reverse primer, and amplifying from the full length cDNA using a proof-reading polymerase (Pfu). The amplicon was digested with HindIII and XhoI, gel purified, and cloned into the corresponding sites in pcDNA3.1(+). Rat beta4 subunit was amplified by RT-PCR from rat adrenal RNA, and was TA cloned into pCR2.1, excised with HindIII and XhoI, and subcloned into pcDNA3.1. Directional orientation and sequence of the inserts was determined by DNA sequencing at the BioResource Center (Cornell University).

HEK-293 cells (American Type Culture Collection: CRL-1573) were transiently transfected using lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco) following the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, HEK cells were grown to 70–80% confluency in DMEM +2 mM glutamine supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. After DNA-lipid complexes were allowed to form; cells were transfected with either cDNAs encoding Slo-{alpha} alone (1 µg DNA) or cotransfected with cDNAs for Slo-{alpha} and Slo-beta subunits in a 1:1 ratio. An additional plasmid containing a modified green fluorescent protein (GFP; pBFP-N1; Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) was also cotransfected into the cells for identification. Cells were plated on 35-mm culture dishes (Falcon) coated with collagen (0.53 mg/ml; Vitrogen, Palo Alto, CA) and lifted with a solution containing (in mM) 0.5 EDTA, 38 sucrose, 34 D-glucose, 156 NaCl, 5 KCl, 4 NaHCO3, and 9 HEPES, pH 7.2. Transfected cells were patched between 2 and 5 days after replating.

Chromaffin cell isolation and culture

Rat chromaffin cells were isolated and cultured as described previously (Lovell et al. 2000Go). Briefly, Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were anesthetized with CO2 and killed by cervical spinal dislocation. Adrenomedullary tissue was dissected from surrounding cortical tissue, minced, washed in sterile saline, and incubated for 60 min in collagenase B (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN; 1.5 mg/ml; pH 7.0), at 37°C. Tissue was washed in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free saline, and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in trypsin (Gibco; 0.125% in Hank's Ca2+- and Mg2+-free saline). Chromaffin cells were triturated through fire-polished pipettes and plated in sterile culture medium (Gibco; RPMI 1640 with 10% horse serum, 5% fetal calf serum, 2 U/ml penicillin-G, 2 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 100 U/ml nystatin) in glass-bottom dishes coated with poly-D-lysine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 0.01% in ddH2O). Cell cultures were maintained in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C for 1–4 days.

Electrophysiological methods

Single channel and macroscopic currents were recorded in the inside-out configuration. Patch electrodes (3–5 M{Omega}) were pulled from borosilicate glass and coated with silicone elastomer (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, OH). Data were collected using a List EPC-9 patch clamp amplifier (Heka Electronik, Lambrecht, Germany), Bessel filtered at 10 kHz, and stored on a Power Macintosh G3 using Pulse 8.5 software (Heka Electronik, Lambrecht, Germany). Off-line analysis was done with custom software written for Igor Pro (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR).

Experiments were conducted at 20–22°C. After attaining gigaohm seals, calcium-free saline was perfused on the cell and inside-out patches were pulled. Exchange of solutions was accomplished with eight computer-controlled, gravity-fed lines converging near the tip of a large perfusion pipette.

For inside-out patches, standard patch-clamp recording techniques were used. HEK cells were typically held at –80 mV and stepped to +80 mV for 450 ms after a prepulse to –140 mV for 450 ms, with a 2-s interval between sweeps. For the determination of the voltage dependence of BK channels, a series of increasing voltage steps was applied in 20-mV increments from –140 to +140 mV for 350 ms. For the voltage dependence of inactivation, the steady-state current after activation was measured by a second voltage step to +80 mV for 350 ms.

Solutions

To eliminate a potassium driving force and allow DC offset to be cancelled at 0 mV, symmetrical K+ solutions were used. The pipette saline and perfusion solutions were comprised of (in mM) 160 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1 HEDTA, and 0.0375 CaOH; pH was adjusted with KOH to 7.2 to make ~500 nM to 1 µM free [Ca2+]. Calculations of free [Ca2+] were made through MaxChelator software (WebMaxC v2.10). Zero-Ca2+ solution contained 5 mM EGTA (Sigma). Rodent Ringer contained (in mM) 145 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.2. The osmolarity of all solutions before the addition of steroids was measured by dew point osmometry and adjusted to 300 ± 10 mosM with ddH20 or NaCl. Steroids were dissolved in 100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), stored in small aliquots, and added fresh to recording salines. DMSO vehicle in the control saline (0.1%, same concentration as steroid solution) did not alter BK channel activity.

Data and statistical analysis

Single and multichannel currents were linear leak subtracted and ensemble currents fit using a Levenberg-Marquardt search algorithm to estimate kinetic parameters. Percent changes in steroids were measured by comparing the maximum peak amplitudes of the current traces before and after treatment with steroid. Ensemble currents were usually averages of 15–30 individual current traces taken 30–60 s after switching perfusion lines to allow patches to stabilize. Patches where BK current was not stable after 3 min were excluded from analysis. Patches used in analysis showed stable BK currents throughout the experiment (Figs. 2B and 4B). Dose–response curves were generated with mostly patches exposed to only one concentration of steroid. In a few cases, patches were included where complete washout was observed after the previous application of a lower concentration of steroid.


Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Rapid modulation of {alpha}beta4 channels by corticosterone. A: in an inside-out patch, containing ≥6 channels, BK currents were activated by a test pulse to +80 mV from a holding potential of –80 mV. Application of 1 µM corticosterone (CORT) to the patch rapidly increased the number of BK channels open during successive sweeps. Ensemble averages of 30 such sweeps are shown below. B: time scale plot from an inside-out patch showing acute potentiation of BK current (within 30 s) at 10 nM CORT, reproducibility, and reversibility of steroid effect. Each point on the time scale represents a running average of 5 trace samples. C: dose-dependent increases are evident in different concentrations of CORT covering 6 orders of magnitude (means ± SE). Current amplitudes were measured from tails at –80 after a test potential of +80 mV. A significant increase compared with perfusion of control saline (*P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test) was seen at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM CORT. Effects at 1, 10, and 100 µM were significantly greater than at 0.001 and 0.01 µM CORT; 10 µM CORT had a significantly greater effect on {alpha}beta4 channels than 10 µM cholesterol, a steroid precursor (#P < 0.05, Student's t-test). The dose–response curve was fit by a Hill equation with a Hill coefficient of 1.4 and a half-maximal point of 0.182 µM. D: time scale plot from whole cell patch configuration showing the acute potentiation of BK current at 1 µM CORT (left). BK current elicited in whole cell mode by a test potential to +80 mV is potentiated after application of 1 µM CORT (right).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Rapid modulation of {alpha}beta2 channels by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). A: in an inside-out patch containing ≥14 channels, steps to +80 mV from a prepulse potential of –140 mV activates rapidly and completely inactivating BK channels. Treatment of the patch with 10 µM DHEA increased the average number of channels open during successive sweeps. Ensemble averages of 25 such sweeps are shown below. B: time scale plot shows that 10 µM DHEA rapidly potentiates BK channel opening within 10 s of application. Each point on the time scale represents a running average of 3 points. C: exposure of BK channels to DHEA resulted in dose-dependent increases in mean current amplitude (±SE), expressed as a percentage of pretreatment amplitude for respective patches. *Significant difference from vehicle perfusion experiments; #significant difference from 1 µM result shown (n = 7, 17, 18, and 11 for 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM DHEA, respectively, P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). The curve has a Hill coefficient of ~1.0 and a half-maximal dose at ~2 µM. D: representative traces from 1 patch with steps to +40 or +80 mV after a 200-ms prepulse to –140 mV in the presence of 10 µM DHEA (top). DHEA shifts the voltage dependence of BK channel activation and inactivation to more negative voltages (bottom). Conductance–voltage (G-V) plots were generated from traces as in top panel. Steady-state inactivation (H/HMax) plots were generated from steps to +80 mV from varying inactivating-prepulse voltages of 350-ms duration. E: at lower test potentials, inactivation time constants ({tau}i) obtained with single exponential fits were smaller in DHEA than control saline. F: mean time constant of inactivation at +40 mV was significantly decreased by 10 µM DHEA (n = 6; P = 0.01). G: traces from a single patch expressing the noninactivating mutant form of beta2, showing dose-dependent increases in current in response to 1, 10, and 100 µM DHEA (left). Currents produced by {alpha}beta2NI channels were potentiated to the same extent by 1, 10, and 100 µM DHEA as {alpha}beta2 channels (no significant difference, right).

 
The voltage dependence of activation (G-V) was determined by measuring either peak current activation, or peak amplitudes of tail currents, and dividing by the respective driving force. Plotted values of conductance (G) as a function of test potential (Vm) were fit to a single term Boltzmann function of the form G = Gmax/{1 + exp[(VmV0.5)/s]} with parameters for maximum conductance (Gmax), voltage of half-activation (V1/2), and slope (s; the steepness of the voltage dependence of activation, in mV/e-fold change in voltage). Median peak current amplitudes were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. ANOVA was conducted on rank transformed data. Tukey's conservative pairwise comparisons, with a family error rate (combined P value) of 0.05, were made to determine which categories differed. Inactivation and deactivation time constants, V1/2 measurements, and rat chromaffin cell peak current amplitudes were compared using a Student's t-test (P < 0.05).

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was harvested from quick-frozen tissues using the Qiagen RNeasy kit. Two micrograms of RNA was added to each standard 20-µl reverse transcription reaction (Allolio and Arlt 2002Go) with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (GibcoBRL) and 10 µM oligo-(dT). RT product (1.5 µl) was transferred to each 30-µl PCR reaction with Taq DNA polymerase. Primers for rat beta2 (rbeta2s: 5'-AATCACACTGCTGCGCTCATACAT-3'; rbeta2as: 5'-TTCTGTGTGGTAGAGGAGGAGC-3') gave a predicted product of 319 bp (accession no. AF209747). Primers for beta4 (rbeta41s: 5'-CGGCTCGGCTTGTTCCTCA-3'; rbeta42as: 5'-GCTGGTGCTGGTCGCTGT-3') gave a predicted product of 265 bp (accession no. AF207992). After 3 min at 95°C, 30 cycles were run with 30 s at 95 and 55°C and 45 s at 72°C. Six microliters of PCR product was run on a 2% agarose gel. Ethidium bromide stained gels were UV transilluminated and images captured with a Cohu camera and an LG-3 digitizer, controlled using modified National Institutes of Health image software (Scion, Frederick, MD).


 RESULTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
HEK-293 cells were transiently transfected with cDNA plasmids encoding hSlo-{alpha} alone or in combination with beta1, beta2, or beta4 cDNA, in addition to GFP. Inside-out patches were pulled from green-fluorescing cells after 48–72 h (Fig. 1). Representative ensemble-averaged current traces obtained in the presence of 500 nM [Ca2+]i show fast activating and deactivating BK current from cells expressing the {alpha} Slo subunit alone. Ca2+ and voltage-sensitivity and kinetics were altered by coexpression with beta subunits. Thus beta1 and beta4 slow the activation and the deactivation kinetics of the channel, and rapid inactivation is conferred by coexpression with beta2.


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Heterologous expression of Slo-{alpha} and beta subunits in HEK-293 cells. A: HEK cells transfected with {alpha} and beta2 subunits and a modified green fluorescent protein (GFP), viewed under bright-field (top; scale bar = 50 µm) and fluorescence (bottom). B: schematic representation of the membrane topology of the Slo-{alpha} and beta subunits. C: representative current traces from patches containing BK channels with and without beta subunits. Currents were elicited by stepping the membrane voltage to +80 mV from a prepulse potential of –140 mV in the presence of 500 nM [Ca2+]i. Slo-{alpha} subunits alone produced fast activating and deactivating outward currents that showed no apparent inactivation during the 450-ms voltage-step (top trace). The beta1 subunit ({alpha}beta1) slowed both activation and deactivation kinetics (2nd trace). Cells expressing {alpha}beta2 subunits conferred rapid and complete inactivation on BK channels (3rd trace). Currents elicited from {alpha}beta4 subunits characteristically activated and deactivated more slowly than Slo-{alpha} alone (bottom trace).

 
beta4 confers sensitivity to corticosterone on Slo channels

Inside-out patches with varying numbers of BK channels were pulled from HEK 293 cells expressing Slo-{alpha} and beta4 subunits. In control saline (500 nM [Ca2+]i), large-conductance (~300 pS) openings were often discernible in individual sweeps at +80 mV (450-ms duration; Fig. 2A). BK currents were allowed to stabilize for 3–5 min before application of steroid. Ensemble traces best show the average relative increase in current amplitude produced by the steroid. Channel opening events increased in number within tens of seconds after the application of steroid with concentrations as little as 10 nM CORT (Fig. 2B). Although responses at 10 nM were not observed for every patch, washoff and repeat application in specific cases provided compelling proof of the effect at this low dose. Effects at 100 nM, while still variable, were statistically significant on average, as described below. The potentiation did not diminish appreciably with time over 30 min or more of continuous exposure, and could be at least partially reversed by washout, typically fully at lower concentrations. CORT (1 µM) had minimal effect on {alpha} alone.

CORT effects could not be explained by a change in single channel conductance. Single channel current amplitude at +80 mV in control saline and 1 µM CORT averaged 25.2 ± 0.5 and 24.4 ± 0.7 pA, respectively (n = 9 each; P = 0.4, Student's t-test). Reversibility was observed to be more complete at lower concentrations of CORT: at 0.01, 0.1, and 1 µM, cases of complete washout of steroid effect (100%) were observed with an average washout of 81.8 ± 8.0 (n = 13), 81.6 ± 24.9 (n = 7), and 63.7 ± 10.6% (n = 7), respectively. At concentrations of 10 and 100 µM CORT, an average washout of 53.1 ± 8.6 (n = 12) and 63.0 ± 6.8% (n = 15) was observed, respectively. To rule out effects of switching between perfusion lines, switches between two lines with control saline were performed. This had no significant effect on peak current amplitudes (mean change = 1.7 ± 1.2%, n = 16, data not shown).

CORT was found to increase BK current measured at test potentials of +80 mV in a roughly dose-dependent manner in inside-out patches expressing {alpha}beta4 channels (Fig. 2C). Mean increases in current elicited with steps to +80 mV were measured for CORT concentrations covering six orders of magnitude. Increases were 10.2 ± 5.5 (±SE; n = 10), 20.2 ± 4.3 (n = 21), 38.4 ± 4.9 (n = 15), 88.2 ± 28.2 (n = 18), 101.9 ± 38.4 (n = 23), and 88.4 ± 20.0% (n = 21) for 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM CORT, respectively. Responses to 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM CORT were significantly different from switching between control solutions. Additionally, 1, 10, and 100 µM were significantly different from 0.001 and 0.01 µM CORT (1-way ANOVA, F statistic with 6 and 122 degrees of freedom for between treatment and within treatment variation, F6,122 = 20.13; P < 0.001, means compared with Tukey's pairwise post hoc comparisons, family error rate of 0.05). Cholesterol (10 µM), a steroid precursor, had a significantly smaller effect on {alpha}beta4 channels than 10 µM CORT (2.0 ± 9.3%, n = 5, P < 0.05, Student's t-test). The dose–response curve was fit by a Hill equation with a Hill coefficient of 1.4 and a half-maximal effect at 182 nM. Under the whole cell recording configuration, 1 µM CORT also potentiated {alpha}beta4 BK channels within seconds of application (Fig. 2D, left). In the example shown (Fig. 2D, right), 1 µM CORT potentiated BK current by 57.3%. In whole cell mode, the average potentiation by 1 µM CORT was 52.3 ± 5.1% (n = 2).

For a subset of patches, the effects of steroids were tested with a full series of test potentials (Fig. 3A), revealing that steroids produce a simple parallel shift of the G-V curve in the negative direction. In the example shown in Fig. 3A, 1 µM CORT shifted V1/2 by –10.0 mV. On average, V1/2 was shifted by –13.0 ± 2.8 mV by 1 µM CORT (Fig. 3B, n = 4; note [Ca2+]i = 1 µM in these experiments). The average V1/2 was significantly different in control conditions than in 1 µM CORT (V1/2 = 83.4 ± 7.3 and 70.4 ± 5.5 mV in control and in 1 µM CORT, n = 4 and 4, respectively, P = 0.019, Student's t-test). At other concentrations, V1/2 was also shifted to more negative potentials. At 10 and 100 µM CORT (with [Ca2+]i = 500 nM), V1/2 was shifted on average by –10.8 ± 0.8 and –17.4 ± 4.1 mV, n = 5 and 4, respectively).


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. CORT shifts voltage dependence of activation and slows deactivation. A: for patches containing {alpha}beta4 channels, test potentials were stepped in 10 mV increments in control saline and in the presence of 1 µM CORT. Conductance–voltage (G-V) plots were generated from tail currents and fit with a Boltzman function. In 1 µM CORT, a shift of –10 mV was seen for the half activation voltage (V1/2) in one particular patch. B: on average, 1 µM CORT produced a –13.0 mV shift in V1/2. Under control conditions, V1/2 (83.4 ± 7.3 mV, n = 4) was significantly different from V1/2 in 1 µM CORT (70.4 ± 5.5 mV, n = 4, *P < 0.05, Student's t-test). C: For a subset of patches, dose–response curves showed higher percent increases at lower test potentials (+40 and +60 mV). When each dose–response curve was fit with a Hill function (top left), Hill coefficients were ~1.0, and half-maximal response values ranged from 183 to 367 nM. D: higher concentrations of CORT also slowed the deactivation kinetics of {alpha}beta4 channels. At a concentration of 1 µM CORT, average time constant of deactivation at a test potential of +80 mV was increased significantly (P < 0.01, Student's t-test).

 
For one set of patches, the effects of CORT were measured at +40, 60, and 80 mV and mean percentage increases computed over the six orders of concentrations (Fig. 3C). Despite wide variation related to the aforementioned complications, mean dose responses at +40, 60, and 80 mV were each fit well by a Hill equation, yielding three curves with strikingly similar Hill coefficients of ~1.0 and half-maximal response values of 183, 278, and 360 nM, respectively.

CORT also reduced the rate of current deactivation ({tau}deact estimated by a single exponential fit to the tail current). On average, the time constant of deactivation at a test potential of +80 mV was increased significantly from 3.3 ± 0.3 ms in control saline to 10.6 ± 2 ms in 1 µM CORT (n = 15 and 8, respectively, P = 0.008; Fig. 3D). This effect was observed at several CORT concentrations and several test potentials. The dose response of this effect could also be well approximated by a Hill function with a coefficient of 1.0 and a half-maximal point <500 nM.

beta2 confers sensitivity to DHEA on Slo channels

Inside-out patches with varying numbers of channels were pulled from cells expressing Slo {alpha} plus beta2 subunits. In control saline (500 nM [Ca2+]i), large-conductance (~260 pS) openings were often discernible in individual sweeps at +80 mV (450-ms duration) after a brief prepulse to –140 mV to relieve all inactivation (Fig. 4A). Ensemble averages of 25 traces show the average relative increase in current amplitude produced by the steroid. As with CORT on beta4 channels, channel openings increased in number within tens of seconds after application of 10 µM DHEA (Fig. 4B). Mean responses were measured at concentrations covering four orders of magnitude (Fig. 4C). The average increase at 100 nM DHEA was not significant (7.9 ± 3.6%; n = 7). However, 1 µM DHEA significantly increased current compared with control saline by an average of 17.9 ± 4.5% (n = 17); 10 and 100 µM DHEA increased current by 36.9 ± 6.8 and 42.5 ± 12.2%, respectively (n = 18 and 11; F4,64 = 19.18; P < 0.001). Responses at 10 and 100 µM were significantly greater than at 1 µM but not significantly different from each other. The dose–response curve was fit with a Hill equation having a coefficient of 1.03 and a half-maximal concentration at 2.2 µM. Responses at all concentrations were quite variable in size among patches. However, in individual patches, higher concentrations typically produced bigger responses (Fig. 4G).

Conductance–voltage (G-V) plots were constructed from peak amplitudes of currents elicited by an incremental series of depolarizing steps before and after application of one or more concentrations of DHEA (Fig. 4D, bottom). In the example in Fig. 4D, 10 µM DHEA shifted V1/2 by –15.1 mV. Similar shifts were seen in an additional five cases, with an average V1/2 shift of –14.3 ± 3.5 mV. DHEA (10 µM) also produced a negative shift in the voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation (Vinact; Fig. 4D, bottom). In this example, Vinact was shifted –13.9 mV. The average shift was –10.5 ± 1.9 mV (n = 3). In all patches, DHEA increased the rate of inactivation at relatively negative voltages. The rate was sharply voltage-dependent, particularly at potentials in the range of +20 to +60 mV (Fig. 4E; {tau} estimated from a single-exponential fit to the current decay during steps from the –140 mV prepulse). At +40 mV, control traces had an average {tau} of 72.9 ± 3.8 mV, whereas in 10 µM DHEA, the average was 58.3 ± 1.9 ms (n = 6 patches; P = 0.01, Student's t-test; Fig. 4F).

To rule out any possible confounding effects of inactivation on apparent steroid sensitivity, we removed the inactivation domain. Deletion of the amino terminal residues FIW in positions 2–4 from the beta2 construct (Xia et al. 2003Go) completely eliminated functional inactivation. The effects of DHEA on noninactivating {alpha}beta2NI BK current were very similar to those seen with the fully intact beta2 construct (Fig. 4G). From inside-out patches, at 1 µM DHEA, peak current at +80 mV was increased by 17.9 ± 4.5% (n = 17) for {alpha}beta2 channels and 21.9 ± 6.3% (n = 12) for {alpha}beta2NI channels (P = 0.60, Student's t-test). At 10 µM DHEA, peak current was increased by 37.0 ± 6.8% (n = 13) for {alpha}beta2 channels and 29.8 ± 14.2% (n = 7) for {alpha}beta2NI channels (P = 0.61, Student's t-test). At 100 µM DHEA, peak current was increased by 42.5 ± 12.2% (n = 8) for {alpha}beta2 channels and 45.7 ± 27.1% (n = 7) for {alpha}beta2NI channels (P = 0.91, Student's t-test).

beta subunits confer distinct steroid sensitivities

Steroid responses were different for different channel subunit compositions. With a test potential of +80 mV, the application of 1 or 10 µM CORT on HEK cells expressing only the Slo-{alpha} subunit had little effect on BK currents. On average, 1 or 10 µM CORT altered current amplitude in {alpha} channels by 14.3 ± 3.2 and 12.4 ± 9.8% and (n = 3 and 7, respectively). {alpha}beta2 channels (both the full construct and noninactivating construct) were typically potentiated by 1 and 10 µM CORT (0.2 ± 5.5%, n = 5 and 17.6 ± 4.8%, n = 16, respectively), but to a lesser extent than {alpha}beta4 channels (88.2 ± 28.2%, n = 18 for 1 µM CORT and 101.9 ± 38.4%, n = 23 for 10 µM CORT; Fig. 5A). Cells expressing {alpha}beta4 channels were significantly more responsive to 1 µM CORT than {alpha}-only or {alpha}beta2 channels (F2,23 = 16.46, P < 0.01). At 10 µM CORT, {alpha}beta4 channels responded significantly more than {alpha}beta2 or {alpha}-only channels (F2,43 = 8.21, P < 0.01; Fig. 5A). The application of 1 or 10 µM DHEA also had little effect on {alpha} channels, current was altered by 4.6 ± 6.2% (n = 5) for 1 µM DHEA and –2.1 ± 8.8% (n = 12) for 10 µM DHEA (Fig. 5B). Patches expressing {alpha}beta2 channels were potentiated to a greater extent by 1 or 10 µM DHEA (22.2 ± 6.2%, n = 12, and 36.3 ± 6.5%, n = 19, respectively) than patches expressing {alpha}beta4 channels (–6.5 ± 16.5%, n = 6 for 1 µM DHEA and 9.6 ± 10.4%, n = 15 for 10 µM DHEA; Fig. 5B). At 1 µM DHEA, {alpha}beta2 channels were significantly more sensitive to DHEA than {alpha}beta4 channels (F2,20 = 4.82, P < 0.05). At 10 µM DHEA, {alpha}beta2 channels responded significantly more than {alpha}beta4 or {alpha}-only channels (F2,43 = 12.71, P < 0.01; Fig. 5B).


Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Different beta subunits show different sensitivities to steroids. A: at 1 µM CORT, BK currents elicited at +80 mV from {alpha}beta4 channels (n = 18) showed significantly greater potentiation than currents from {alpha}beta2 channels (n = 5) or {alpha} channels (n = 3). Potentiation of BK current at 10 µM CORT was also significantly greater for {alpha}beta4 channels (n = 23) than {alpha}beta2 (n = 16) and {alpha}-only (n = 7, *P < 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). B: for 1 µM DHEA, {alpha}beta2 channels (n = 12) were more responsive than {alpha}-only (n = 5) or {alpha}beta4 channels (n = 6, {alpha}beta2 and {alpha}beta4 differed significantly, *P < 0.05). {alpha}beta2 channels (n = 19) were significantly more sensitive to 10 µM DHEA than {alpha}-only (n = 12) and {alpha}beta4 (n = 15, *P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test).

 
beta2 and beta4 confer sensitivity to multiple steroids

We examined the possibility that several other related steroids might also modulate BK channels (Fig. 6A). For {alpha}beta2 channels, mean percentage increases in peak current amplitude at 10 µM were 5.3 ± 2.5% for cholesterol, 36.3 ± 6.5% for DHEA, 18.2 ± 4.9% for DHEA-S, 17.6 ± 4.8% for corticosterone, 5.6 ± 8.9% for androstenedione, 19.9 ± 9.5% for testosterone, and 29.6 ± 5.1% for 17beta-estradiol (Fig. 6B, top; n = 5, 19, 14, 16, 3, 6, and 6 patches, respectively). Effects of DHEA, CORT, and estradiol were significantly different from control saline. In addition, the effects of DHEA and estradiol were significantly different from cholesterol (F7,73 = 6.42; P < 0.001). For {alpha}beta4 channels, mean percentage increases in 10 µM steroid were 2.0 ± 9.3% for cholesterol, 9.6 ± 10.4% for DHEA, 17.7 ± 4.9% for DHEA-S, 101.9 ± 38.4% for corticosterone, 18.1 ± 4.3% for progesterone, 30.9 ± 8.3% for testosterone, and 40.6 ± 3.2% for 17beta-estradiol (Fig. 6B, bottom; n = 5, 15, 9, 23, 11, 8, and 7 patches, respectively). Effects of CORT, testosterone, and estradiol were significantly different from control saline, effects of DHEA and CORT were significantly different from each other, and effects of estradiol and CORT were significantly different from 10 µM cholesterol (F7,82 = 7.89; P < 0.001).


Figure 6
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Multiple steroids modulate Slo {alpha}beta2 and {alpha}beta4 channels. A: flow chart showing synthesis relationships between steroids used in this study. B: bar graphs of cells expressing {alpha}beta2 or {alpha}beta4 channels, showing mean (±SE) peak current amplitudes expressed as a percentage of pretreatment amplitudes, after exposure to 10 µM steroid. (n shown in parentheses, *significant difference from responses to control saline, #significant difference from cholesterol, **significant difference from cholesterol and DHEA, P < 0.001, Kruskal Wallis test).

 
CORT and DHEA affect chromaffin cell BK channels

We recently showed that glucocorticoids modulate BK gating and chromaffin cell excitability in rat and bovine chromaffin cells (Lovell et al. 2004Go). The gating effects of CORT and DHEA on heterologously expressed channels described above are very similar. Inside-out patches were pulled from bovine chromaffin cells and stepped from –80 to +80 mV. BK currents were recorded before and after application of 10 µM CORT (Fig. 7A). CORT (10 µM) caused a rapid increase in BK current (in the trace shown, a 103.2% increase). An average increase of 48.5 ± 10.8% was observed in five additional patches. While full characterization of net effects of DHEA on native channel gating and its consequences remain to be investigated, we have made an initial test to determine whether DHEA has any effect on rat chromaffin BK channels. In this study, complications from inactivation were minimized by stepping for 450 ms to –140 mV before the test step to +80 mV, as was done with HEK-293 patches. The magnitude of ensemble current from inside-out patches from dissociated cells was robustly increased by DHEA. Peak current in this case (Fig. 7A, bottom) was increased by 40.2%. Current was increased similarly in six of six patches (mean increase of 42.5 ± 13.2%). Both inactivating and sustained components of the current were increased similarly, compared with control experiments where patches were reperfused with control saline (P < 0.05, Student's t-test).


Figure 7
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Voltage-dependent activation of native BK channels in chromaffin cells is potentiated by 10 µM CORT and 10 µM DHEA. BK currents were elicited by voltage steps to +80 mV in the presence of 500 nM [Ca2+]i. A: current from a bovine chromaffin cell was increased by 103.2% by 10 µM CORT in the example shown and by an average of 48.5 ± 10.8% (n = 6; top); 10 µM DHEA potentiated BK current from rat chromaffin cells by 40.2% in the example shown and by an average of 42.5 ± 13.2% (n = 6, bottom). B: RT-PCR analysis reveals robust expression of beta2 and beta4 subunit mRNA in rat adrenal medulla. beta2 and beta4 were both expressed in hippocampus. beta2 was expressed primarily in the posterior pituitary; weak expression in anterior pituitary may reflect imperfect separation from posterior pituitary; however, the assay is not quantitatively accurate. beta4 expressed strongly in anterior pituitary. Results are representative of tissue samples from ≥4 rats.

 
RT-PCR primers were used to test for expression of Slo beta2 and beta4 mRNA in adrenal medulla and a small sample of other tissues. Both were robustly represented in RNA acutely extracted from medullary tissue (Fig. 7B). Both were expressed in hippocampus and both anterior and posterior pituitary, although beta2 signal was weak in anterior pituitary, possibly reflecting contamination from posterior tissue. The results were consistent with the hypothesis that these beta subunits participate in transducing DHEA responses of native chromaffin BK channels.


 DISCUSSION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Our findings, taken with the observations that estradiol interacts with beta1 and beta4 subunits to potentiate BK channel gating (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Dick and Sanders 2001Go; Valverde et al. 1999Go), suggest that all products of the family of mammalian Slo-beta subunit genes should be considered candidate receptors for rapid BK modulation by multiple steroids. We show that physiologically relevant concentrations of corticosterone facilitate gating of BK channels in HEK-293 cells comprised of {alpha} plus beta4 subunits, acting within tens of seconds of application to cell-free inside-out patches and under whole cell conditions. CORT acts in a rapid and reversible manner, ruling out transcriptional mechanisms. Its effects were dose-dependent and consistent with a Hill coefficient of ~1.0 (no co-operativity between effector sites) and a half-maximal dose <400 nM. Percentage increases in current amplitude depend on test potential, reflecting the fact that CORT acts primarily by shifting the voltage dependence of gating in the negative direction, under conditions of constant [Ca2+]i. CORT's effects on {alpha}beta4 channels were significantly different from on BK channels with {alpha}beta2-encoded subunits, showing that beta subunits differentiate between steroids. The difference was not an artifact of {alpha}beta2 channel inactivation; a noninactivating mutant beta2 also conferred only weak sensitivity to CORT. While {alpha}beta2 channels did not respond as strongly to any of the steroids yet tested, robust, rapid, and dose-dependent potentiation was elicited by exposure to DHEA, an androgen-related steroid produced in large quantities by the adrenal cortex. The DHEA sensitivity conferred by {alpha}beta2 was significantly greater than that conferred by {alpha}beta4. Both channel types showed modest potentiation by several other steroids, as tested with test potentials of +80 mV, but no response to the common precursor steroid cholesterol. BK channels comprised of only {alpha} subunits were completely insensitive to any steroids at all levels tested.

The results indicate that the previously known modifying effects of the various beta subunits on BK gating seen in the absence of steroids must represent only part of their biological significance; the shared ability of beta subunits to confer sensitivity to changes in steroid concentrations broadens their potential relevance to cellular excitability in many contexts. Moreover, while beta subunits tend to react to more than one steroid, they clearly discriminate between steroids; different members of the family confer distinct profiles of relative affinity for specific steroids. This heterogeneity implies a greater dynamic repertoire of BK functional nuances than previously postulated, warranting further study in vivo.

Increasing concentrations of CORT (from 10–9 to 10–4 M) and DHEA (from 10–7 to 10–4 M) had progressively stronger effects, suggesting a wide dynamic range of steroid modulation, encompassing physiologically relevant concentrations. Nevertheless, variability in the percentage increase in current was substantial at all concentrations. Some of this can be attributed to the stochastic nature of BK channel activity, given their relatively small number in patches and large unit conductance, and the irregular bursting and mode-shifting behaviors for which BK channels are known. Variation in steroid sensitivity per se also probably arises from variation in the number of beta subunits associated with each Slo-{alpha} tetramer (1–4); variation in this stoichiometry is suggested by variation in the kinetics of inactivation, a property also conferred by beta2 (Wang et al. 2002Go). We observed a modest positive correlation between the DHEA effect and the rate of inactivation (reciprocal of the inactivation time constant). Additional heterogeneity almost certainly derives from unknowns in both {alpha} and beta functional status, including phosphorylation, glycosylation, redox state, and accessory protein associations (Gong et al. 2000Go; Jin et al. 2002aGo,bGo; McCobb 2004Go; Tang et al. 2001Go).

Previous research has shown that BK channel activation by DHEA or estrogens was not mediated by the production of cAMP and cGMP or by the activation of cyclic nucleotide–dependent protein kinases (Dick and Sanders 2001Go; Farrukh et al. 1998Go; Peng et al. 1999Go). The demonstration that expression of beta1 by itself confers estradiol binding on either oocytes or HEK-293 cells argued that estradiol-binding capacity is inherent in the beta structure (Valverde et al. 1999Go). Most of our experiments were conducted on inside-out patches (to control [Ca2+]i); steroids are highly lipophilic and can easily pass through the membrane. However, application of CORT to the outside of the cell in whole cell experiments also resulted in rapid potentiation of {alpha}beta4 BK channels. Thus our results are not inconsistent with action at binding sites in extracellular domains of the beta subunits, as has been suggested for estradiol, xenoestrogens, and fatty acids (Clarke et al. 2002Go; Dick et al. 2001Go; Valverde et al. 1999Go). However, the steroids could also act at a site that depends on the presence of both {alpha} and beta (Korovkina et al. 2004Go) or to an intermediate membrane protein that interacts with the beta subunit to confer a conformational change in the channel (Dick and Sanders 2001Go). To formally eliminate the possibility that the subunit induces a steroid-binding capacity that is extrinsic to the subunit itself, direct binding of steroids to purified beta subunits must be shown. The observation that similar but distinct binding specificities to multiple steroids are conferred by different betas, which have 21–43% amino acid identity (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Brenner et al. 2000Go; Uebele et al. 2000Go; Wallner et al. 1999Go; Xia et al. 1999Go), further supports the idea that binding per se is inherent in the subunits. Several segments of conserved residues interspersed with numerous nonconserved regions in the extracellular domains of the beta2 and beta4 subunits could be responsible for overlapping but distinct steroid sensitivities. Cross-comparisons and targeted mutagenesis experiments with these gene products should elucidate relationships between steroid and protein structural and functional interactions.

The proximity of chromaffin cells to the source of adrenal steroid synthesis exposes them to at least episodic pulses of steroids at much higher concentrations than in systemic blood. Systemic CORT levels may not greatly exceed 1 µM, but adrenal blood concentrations may reach concentrations as high as 100 µM (Betito et al. 1992Go, 1994Go). Androgen levels in adrenal blood are not known, but systemic DHEA and DHEA-S levels are on the order of 10 nM and 10 µM, respectively (Baulieu 1996Go). BK channels shape the intrinsic excitability of chromaffin cells, particularly repetitive firing properties, and thus shape catecholamine secretory responses to input (Lingle 1996; Lovell and McCobb 2001Go; Lovell et al. 2004Go). In addition to data presented here, molecular and functional expression studies suggest that beta2 (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Ding and Lingle 2002Go; Solaro and Lingle 1992Go; Xia et al. 1999Go) and beta4 (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Brenner et al. 2000Go) are expressed in chromaffin cells. Channel inactivation very similar to that conferred by beta2 is seen in both rat and bovine cells, although viewed across the respective chromaffin populations, there are striking species differences (Lovell et al. 2000Go). Thus inactivation is more common and tends to be faster and more complete in rat than bovine cells. We hypothesize that beta2 and beta4 subunits constitute at least part of the mechanism for both DHEA and corticosterone effects on chromaffin BK channels (Lovell et al. 2004Go). It seems probable that differential expression within one gland, between individuals, and between species, also confers differential stress-related tuning on cell excitability.

DHEA (50 µM) acutely facilitates BK channel activation in patches from ferret pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cells by shifting the voltage dependence of activation 20–25 mV in the negative direction (Farrukh et al. 1998Go; Peng et al. 1999Go). In addition to beta1, beta2 is strongly expressed in rat lung, if perhaps less strongly in human (Behrens et al. 2000Go; Wallner et al. 1999Go; Xia et al. 1999Go). beta4 is apparently expressed in human lung as well (Behrens et al. 2000Go). Given the similarities between the ferret lung and our patch-clamp results, we postulate that beta2 and/or beta4 are involved and speculate that stress-evoked rises in DHEA promote vasodilation to facilitate oxygen uptake.

Roles played by glucocorticoids in stress responses have been studied in some detail. The ability of CORT to both reduce neuronal firing rate in celiac ganglion cells and enhance firing rate in cardiovascular neurons located in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (Hua and Chen 1989Go; Rong et al. 1999Go) shows the importance of rapid steroid modulation in neuronal excitability. Most recently, the acute application of dexamethasone has been shown to increase BK channel activity in pituitary GH3 and AtT-20 cells and reduce the firing of action potentials in GH3 cells (Huang et al. 2005Go). However, rapid modulation of BK channels and repetitive firing properties of adrenomedullary chromaffin cell by steroids synthesized in the adrenal cortex had not been considered until recently (Lovell et al. 2004Go). The "strategic" significance of DHEA and adrenal androgens in relation to stress responses or other aspects of physiology remains enigmatic. Chronic effects of DHEA on alternative splicing of the Slo-{alpha} subunit at the STREX site in chromaffin cells were recently reported to be directly opposite those of glucocorticoids (Lai and McCobb 2002Go). In contrast, acute effects of the two classes of steroids on BK gating seem to run in parallel (Lovell et al. 2004Go). This sort of multidimensional complexity of steroid functionality (elegantly reviewed by Sapolsky et al. 2000Go) ultimately bears on the complexities of organismal survival. Differential expression of Slo-beta subunits has already been suggested to spawn species differences in nuanced BK gating and cell excitability (Lovell et al. 2000Go; Solaro et al. 1995Go; Wang et al. 2002Go). We suggest that differences in the multisteroidal sensitivity conferred by the beta variants allow for the fine tuning of BK dynamics by different steroids, and provide yet another level of flexibility to the coupling between excitatory input to the adrenal medulla and catecholamine output.


 GRANTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 NS-40790 to D. P. McCobb, GM-07469 to J. T. King, and MH-15793 to P. V. Lovell and National Science Foundation Grant 0308956 to M. L. Zeeman.


 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank O. Chatterjee, G.-J. Lai, R. Harris-Warrick, A. Bass, and Y. Yu for advice and assistance.


 FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. P. McCobb, Dept. of Neurobiology and Behavior, W153 Mudd Hall, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853 (E-mail: dpm9{at}cornell.edu)


 REFERENCES
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Allolio B and Arlt W. DHEA treatment: myth or reality? Trends Endocrinol Metab 13: 288, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bastianetto S, Ramassamy C, Poirier J, and Quirion R. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) protects hippocampal cells from oxidative stress-induced damage. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 66: 35–41, 1999.[Medline]

Baulieu EE. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): a fountain of youth? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 3147–3151, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Behrens R, Nolting A, Reimann F, Schwarz M, Waldschutz R, and Pongs O. hKCNMB3 and hKCNMB4, cloning and characterization of two members of the large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel beta subunit family. FEBS Lett 474: 99–106, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Betito K, Diorio J, Meaney MJ, and Boksa P. Adrenal phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase induction in relation to glucocorticoid receptor dynamics: evidence that acute exposure to high cortisol levels is sufficient to induce the enzyme. J Neurochem 58: 1853–1862, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]

Betito K, Mitchell JB, Bhatnagar S, Boksa P, and Meaney MJ. Regulation of the adrenomedullary catecholaminergic system after mild, acute stress. Am J Physiol 267: R212–R220, 1994.

Brayden JE and Nelson MT. Regulation of arterial tone by activation of calcium-dependent potassium channels. Science 256: 532–535, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brenner R, Chen QH, Vilaythong A, Toney GM, Noebels JL, and Aldrich RW. BK channel beta4 subunit reduces dentate gyrus excitability and protects against temporal lobe seizures. Nat Neurosci 8: 1752–1759, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brenner R, Jegla TJ, Wickenden A, Liu Y, and Aldrich RW. Cloning and functional characterization of novel large conductance calcium-activated potassium channel beta subunits, hKCNMB3 and hKCNMB4. J Biol Chem 275: 6453–6461, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clarke AL, Petrou S, Walsh JV Jr, and Singer JJ. Modulation of BK(Ca) channel activity by fatty acids: structural requirements and mechanism of action. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283: C1441–C1453, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Deenadayalu VP, White RE, Stallone JN, Gao X, and Garcia AJ. Testosterone relaxes coronary arteries by opening the large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channel. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H1720–H1727, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dick GM, Rossow CF, Smirnov S, Horowitz B, and Sanders KM. Tamoxifen activates smooth muscle BK channels through the regulatory beta 1 subunit. J Biol Chem 276: 34594–34599, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dick GM and Sanders KM. (Xeno)estrogen sensitivity of smooth muscle BK channels conferred by the regulatory beta1 subunit: a study of beta1 knockout mice. J Biol Chem 276: 44835–44840, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ding JP and Lingle CJ. Steady-state and closed-state inactivation properties of inactivating BK channels. Biophys J 82: 2448–2465, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dopico AM, Walsh JV Jr, and Singer JJ. Natural bile acids and synthetic analogues modulate large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) channel activity in smooth muscle cells. J Gen Physiol 119: 251–273, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dworetzky SI, Boissard CG, Lum-Ragan JT, McKay MC, Post-Munson DJ, Trojnacki JT, Chang CP, and Gribkoff VK. Phenotypic alteration of a human BK (hSlo) channel by hSlobeta subunit coexpression: changes in blocker sensitivity, activation/relaxation and inactivation kinetics, and protein kinase A modulation. J Neurosci 16: 4543–4550, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Falkenstein E, Tillmann HC, Christ M, Feuring M, and Wehling M. Multiple actions of steroid hormones–a focus on rapid, nongenomic effects. Pharmacol Rev 52: 513–556, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Farrukh IS, Peng W, Orlinska U, and Hoidal JR. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: a Ca(2+)-activated K(+)-channel opener. Am J Physiol 274: L186–L195, 1998.

Fettiplace R and Fuchs PA. Mechanisms of hair cell tuning. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 809–834, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ffrench-Mullen JM and Spence KT. Neurosteroids block Ca2+ channel current in freshly isolated hippocampal CA1 neurons. Eur J Pharmacol 202: 269–272, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Gong L, Gao TM, Huang H, and Tong Z. Redox modulation of large conductance calcium-activated potassium channels in CA1 pyramidal neurons from adult rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett 286: 191–194, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hua SY and Chen YZ. Membrane receptor-mediated electrophysiological effects of glucocorticoid on mammalian neurons. Endocrinology 124: 687–691, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang MH, So EC, Liu YC, and Wu SN. Glucocorticoids stimulate the activity of large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels in pituitary GH(3) and AtT-20 cells via a non-genomic mechanism. Steroids 71: 129–140, 2005.

Jin P, Weiger TM, and Levitan IB. Reciprocal modulation between the alpha and beta 4 subunits of hSlo calcium-dependent potassium channels. J Biol Chem 277: 43724–43729, 2002a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jin P, Weiger TM, Wu Y, and Levitan IB. Phosphorylation-dependent functional coupling of hSlo calcium-dependent potassium channel and its hbeta 4 subunit. J Biol Chem 277: 10014–10020, 2002b.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jin W, Sugaya A, Tsuda T, Ohguchi H, and Sugaya E. Relationship between large conductance calcium-activated potassium channel and bursting activity. Brain Res 860: 21–28, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kimonides VG, Khatibi NH, Svendsen CN, Sofroniew MV, and Herbert J. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA-sulfate (DHEAS) protect hippocampal neurons against excitatory amino acid-induced neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 1852–1857, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Korovkina VP, Brainard AM, Ismail P, Schmidt TJ, and England SK. Estradiol binding to Maxi-K channels induces their down-regulation via proteasomal degradation. J Biol Chem 279: 1217–1223, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kroboth PD, Salek FS, Pittenger AL, Fabian TJ, and Frye RF. DHEA and DHEA-S: a review. J Clin Pharmacol 39: 327–348, 1999.[Abstract]

Lai GJ and McCobb DP. Opposing actions of adrenal androgens and glucocorticoids on alternative splicing of Slo potassium channels in bovine chromaffin cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 7722–7727, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lingle CJ, Solaro CR, Prakriya M, and Ding JP. Calcium-activated potassium channels in adrenal chromaffin cells. In: Ion Channels, edited by Narahashi T. New York: Plenum, 1996, p. 261–301.

Lovell PV, James DG, and McCobb DP. Bovine versus rat adrenal chromaffin cells: big differences in BK potassium channel properties. J Neurophysiol 83: 3277–3286, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lovell PV, King JT, and McCobb DP. Acute modulation of adrenal chromaffin cell BK channel gating and cell excitability by glucocorticoids. J Neurophysiol 91: 561–570, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lovell PV and McCobb DP. Pituitary control of BK potassium channel function and intrinsic firing properties of adrenal chromaffin cells. J Neurosci 21: 3429–3442, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Majewska MD, Demirgoren S, Spivak CE, and London ED. The neurosteroid dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is an allosteric antagonist of the GABAA receptor. Brain Res 526: 143–146, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Makara GB and Haller J. Non-genomic effects of glucocorticoids in the neural system. Evidence, mechanisms and implications. Prog Neurobiol 65: 367–390, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

McCobb D. Towards a natural history of calcium-activated potassium channels. In: Advances in Molecular and Cell Biololgy: Molecular and Cellular Insights to Ion Channel Biology, edited by Maue RA. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2004, p. 51–73.

McManus OB, Helms LM, Pallanck L, Ganetzky B, Swanson R, and Leonard RJ. Functional role of the beta subunit of high conductance calcium-activated potassium channels. Neuron 14: 645–650, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Oberbeck R, Benschop RJ, Jacobs R, Hosch W, Jetschmann JU, Schurmeyer TH, Schmidt RE, and Schedlowski M. Endocrine mechanisms of stress-induced DHEA-secretion. J Endocrinol Invest 21: 148–153, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]

Orio P, Rojas P, Ferreira G, and Latorre R. New disguises for an old channel: MaxiK channel beta-subunits. News Physiol Sci 17: 156–161, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peng W, Hoidal JR, and Farrukh IS. Role of a novel KCa opener in regulating K+ channels of hypoxic human pulmonary vascular cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 20: 737–745, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rong W, Wang W, Yuan W, and Chen Y. Rapid effects of corticosterone on cardiovascular neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of rats. Brain Res 815: 51–59, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rosenfeld CR, Cornfield DN, and Roy T. Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels modulate basal and E(2)beta-induced rises in uterine blood flow in ovine pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H422–H431, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salom JB, Burguete MC, Perez-Asensio FJ, Centeno JM, Torregrosa G, and Alborch E. Acute relaxant effects of 17-beta-estradiol through non-genomic mechanisms in rabbit carotid artery. Steroids 67: 339–346, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, and Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21: 55–89, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Solaro CR and Lingle CJ. Trypsin-sensitive rapid inactivation of a calcium-activated potassium channel. Science 257: 1694–1698, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Solaro CR, Prakriya M, Ding JP, and Lingle CJ. Inactivating and noninactivating Ca(2+)- and voltage-dependent K+ current in rat adrenal chromaffin cells. J Neurosci 15: 6110–6123, 1995.[Abstract]

Tang XD, Daggett H, Hanner M, Garcia ML, McManus OB, Brot N, Weissbach H, Heinemann SH, and Hoshi T. Oxidative regulation of large conductance calcium-activated potassium channels. J Gen Physiol 117: 253–274, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Uebele VN, Lagrutta A, Wade T, Figueroa DJ, Liu Y, McKenna E, Austin CP, Bennett PB, and Swanson R. Cloning and functional expression of two families of beta-subunits of the large conductance calcium-activated K+ channel. J Biol Chem 275: 23211–23218, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Valverde MA, Rojas P, Amigo J, Cosmelli D, Orio P, Bahamonde MI, Mann GE, Vergara C, and Latorre R. Acute activation of Maxi-K channels (hSlo) by estradiol binding to the beta subunit. Science 285: 1929–1931, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Goor F, Li YX, and Stojilkovic SS. Paradoxical role of large-conductance calcium-activated K+ (BK) channels in controlling action potential-driven Ca2+ entry in anterior pituitary cells. J Neurosci 21: 5902–5915, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vergara C, Latorre R, Marrion NV, and Adelman JP. Calcium-activated potassium channels. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8: 321–329, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Vermeulen A. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and aging. Ann NY Acad Sci 774: 121–127, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]

Wallner M, Meera P, and Toro L. Molecular basis of fast inactivation in voltage and Ca2+-activated K+ channels: a transmembrane beta-subunit homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 4137–4142, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang YW, Ding JP, Xia XM, and Lingle CJ. Consequences of the stoichiometry of Slo1 alpha and auxiliary beta subunits on functional properties of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels. J Neurosci 22: 1550–1561, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wehling M. Specific, nongenomic actions of steroid hormones. Annu Rev Physiol 59: 365–393, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wolkowitz OM, Reus VI, Roberts E, Manfredi F, Chan T, Raum WJ, Ormiston S, Johnson R, Canick J, Brizendine L, and Weingartner H. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) treatment of depression. Biol Psychiatry 41: 311–318, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Xia XM, Ding JP, and Lingle CJ. Molecular basis for the inactivation of Ca2+- and voltage-dependent BK channels in adrenal chromaffin cells and rat insulinoma tumor cells. J Neurosci 19: 5255–5264, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xia XM, Ding JP, and Lingle CJ. Inactivation of BK channels by the NH2 terminus of the beta2 auxiliary subunit: an essential role of a terminal peptide segment of three hydrophobic residues. J Gen Physiol 121: 125–148, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xia XM, Ding JP, Zeng XH, Duan KL, and Lingle CJ. Rectification and rapid activation at low Ca2+ of Ca2+-activated, voltage-dependent BK currents: consequences of rapid inactivation by a novel beta subunit. J Neurosci 20: 4890–4903, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zinder O and Dar DE. Neuroactive steroids: their mechanism of action and their function in the stress response. Acta Physiol Scand 167: 181–188, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. Tong and R. K. Duncan
Tamoxifen inhibits BK channels in chick cochlea without alterations in voltage-dependent activation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): C75 - C85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
V. G. Romanenko, K. S. Roser, J. E. Melvin, and T. Begenisich
The role of cell cholesterol and the cytoskeleton in the interaction between IK1 and maxi-K channels
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): C878 - C888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
S. Hou, S. H. Heinemann, and T. Hoshi
Modulation of BKCa Channel Gating by Endogenous Signaling Molecules
Physiology, February 1, 2009; 24(1): 26 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. N. Bukiya, J. McMillan, A. L. Parrill, and A. M. Dopico
Structural determinants of monohydroxylated bile acids to activate {beta}1 subunit-containing BK channels
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 2441 - 2451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. J. Brunton, M. Sausbier, G. Wietzorrek, U. Sausbier, H.-G. Knaus, J. A. Russell, P. Ruth, and M. J. Shipston
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Hyporesponsiveness to Restraint Stress in Mice Deficient for Large-Conductance Calcium- and Voltage-Activated Potassium (BK) Channels
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5496 - 5506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. P. Torres, F. J. Morera, I. Carvacho, and R. Latorre
A Marriage of Convenience: beta-Subunits and Voltage-dependent K+ Channels
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 24485 - 24489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. N. Bukiya, J. Liu, L. Toro, and A. M. Dopico
beta1 (KCNMB1) Subunits Mediate Lithocholate Activation of Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels and Dilation in Small, Resistance-Size Arteries
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 359 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
G. Coiret, A.-S. Borowiec, P. Mariot, H. Ouadid-Ahidouch, and F. Matifat
The Antiestrogen Tamoxifen Activates BK Channels and Stimulates Proliferation of MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 843 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Chameau, Y. Qin, S. Spijker, G. Smit, and M. Joels
Glucocorticoids Specifically Enhance L-Type Calcium Current Amplitude and Affect Calcium Channel Subunit Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 5 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/2878    most recent
01352.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCobb, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McCobb, D. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.