JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 3865-3874, 2006. First published March 1, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01196.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3865    most recent
01196.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sceniak, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by MacIver, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sceniak, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by MacIver, M. B.

Cellular Actions of Urethane on Rat Visual Cortical Neurons In Vitro

Michael P. Sceniak and M. Bruce MacIver

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

Submitted 10 November 2005; accepted in final form 23 February 2006


 ABSTRACT
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Urethane is widely used in neurophysiological experiments to anesthetize animals, yet little is known about its actions at the cellular and synaptic levels. This limits our ability to model systems-level cortical function using results from urethane-anesthetized preparations. The present study found that action potential discharge of cortical neurons in vitro, in response to depolarizing current, was strongly depressed by urethane and this was accompanied by a significant decrease in membrane resistance. Voltage-clamp experiments suggest that the mechanism of this depression involves selective activation of a Ba2+-sensitive K+ leak conductance. Urethane did not alter excitatory glutamate-mediated or inhibitory (GABAA- or GABAB-mediated) synaptic transmission. Neither the amplitude nor decay time constant of GABAA- or GABAB-mediated monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were altered by urethane, nor was the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs. These results are consistent with observations seen in vivo during urethane anesthesia where urethane produced minimal disruption of signal transmission in the neocortex.


 INTRODUCTION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study we used an in vitro brain slice preparation to study urethane [ethyl carbamate (NH2COOCH2CH3)] effects on synaptic responses and neuronal excitability. Much is known about the electrophysiological properties of neurons in the neocortex, both in urethane-anesthetized preparations as well as in brain slices, particularly for layer 4 excitatory pyramidal neurons. These neurons are considered the dominant information-processing stream of the neocortex. There is a need to understand the impact of urethane on neocortical pyramidal neurons under urethane anesthesia to help interpret results from electrophysiological recordings and imaging studies of visual system function (Coffey et al. 2002Go; Heynen et al. 2003Go; Ohki et al. 2005Go; Petersen et al. 2003Go).

Urethane has been reported to produce minimal disruption of physiologically relevant measures including reflex responses (Albrecht and Davidowa 1989Go; Dringenberg and Vanderwolf 1995Go; Maggi and Meli 1986Go). Unlike other general anesthetics that depress neuronal responses primarily through synaptic mechanisms (Franks and Lieb 1994Go; Nicoll et al. 1975Go; Nishikawa and MacIver 2000Go; Pittson et al. 2004Go), urethane produced little effect on the time course or amplitude of synaptically evoked inhibitory responses in olfactory cortex (Scholfield 1980Go)—in the only previous study to address urethane effects on synaptic transmission. Basic cellular properties such as resting membrane potential, action potential amplitude, and membrane capacitance also did not vary significantly between measures in vitro and those made in vivo from urethane-anesthetized rats (Bindman et al. 1988Go).

Although urethane appears to preserve synaptic signal transmission, it has also been reported to produce depressive effects on neuronal excitability (Albrecht and Davidowa 1989Go; Dyer and Rigdon 1987Go; Girman et al. 1999Go; Ikeda and Wright 1974Go; Mercer Jr et al. 1978Go). In a recent study, using frog oocytes transfected with several recombinant neurotransmistter receptors, it was also shown that urethane nonselectively affected excitatory and inhibitory currents (Hara and Harris 2002Go; Koblin 2002Go), and thus actions on synaptic transmission would seem likely. The present study investigated the cellular and synaptic mechanism(s) of urethane's action on neocortical pyramidal cells.


 METHODS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Brain slice preparation

All procedures and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee at Stanford University and adhered to published guidelines of the National Institutes of Health. All experiments were performed on rat brain slices dissected from the visual cortex of young [postnatal days 21 to 28 (P21–P28)] male Long–Evans rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). Rats were initially anesthetized with diethyl ether. The entire brain was removed and briefly (<20 s) placed in ice-cold (1–4°C) oxygenated (95% O2-5% CO2) artificial cerebral spinal fluid [ACSF containing the following (in mM): 124, NaCl; 2, KCl; 1.5, MgSO4; 1.25, NaH2PO4; 26, NaCHO3; 10, dextrose; and 2.5, CaCl2]. Brain slices were cut in oxygenated ice-cold ACSF into 350-µm-thick sections.

Electrophysiology

Brain slices were transferred from the holding chamber to a submersion-recording chamber (Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT). Slices were perfused with oxygenated room-temperature (22–24°C) gravity-fed ACSF (2–4 ml/min). Slices were visualized with a Zeiss Axioskop upright microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany), using a water immersion objective (40x) with near-infrared illumination and a CCD camera (COHU, San Diego, CA) with contrast enhancement.

Membrane potentials and currents were monitored with a Multiclamp 700A patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and digitized with a Digidata 1322A analog to digital converter (Axon Instruments). Current and voltage signals were generated digitally in pCLAMP 9.0. Voltage and current traces were sampled at 10 kHz. Data acquisition was controlled using the pCLAMP 9.0 software package (Axon Instruments).

Recording electrodes were filled with either KCl-based or K-gluconate–based internal solutions. K-gluconate–based solution contained K-gluconate, EGTA, HEPES, MgCl2, ATP, and GTP in the following mM concentrations: 100, 10, 40, 5, 2, and 0.3 (pH 7.3 and osmolarity 290–295 mOsm). KCl-based internal solution contained KCl, EGTA, HEPES, MgCl2, ATP, and GTP in the following mM concentrations: 100, 10, 40, 5, 2, and 1.5 (pH 7.3 and osmolarity 290–295 mOsm).

Synaptically evoked responses were elicited using a bipolar stimulating electrode fabricated with theta glass pipettes (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). Stimulating electrodes (10- to 30-µm tip) were positioned near the dendritic field of targeted pyramidal cells in layer 4. Stimulus amplitude was optimized for each cell to produce monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs). Paired-pulse stimulation current pulses were separated by 150 ms with cells at resting membrane potential.

To test intrinsic excitability, each cell was tested for its spiking response to an injected current step input. The appropriate current amplitude for each cell was determined manually by adjusting the input current and monitoring the spiking response. Input current amplitudes were chosen to give rates within the linear range (typically eight to 15 spikes). The rates were coarsely optimized for each cell to reduce variability and prevent spike-rate saturation. Rates <5 s/s tended to produce greater variability and rates >15 s/s tended to be near saturation. However, there was cell-to-cell variability for these parameters. To account for this variability in absolute spike rates across cells, analysis was performed normalized to the control condition's rate on a cell-by-cell basis.

Synaptic {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA)–receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were isolated by bath application of (±)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (APV, 100 µM) and 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX, 17.2 µM) to block N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)–and {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepriopionic acid (AMPA)–receptor-mediated synaptic currents. During voltage-clamp experiments, action potentials were blocked by adding N-(2,6-dimethylphenylcarbamoylmethyl)-triethylammonium bromide (QX-314, 1 mM) to the internal pipette solution. Synaptically evoked IPSC responses were elicited through extracellular current pulses to the dendritic zone of recorded neurons with the membrane potential clamped at its resting membrane potential. IPSCs were completely blocked by additional bath application of picrotoxin (100–200 µM). Spontaneous miniature IPSCs were recorded with each cell voltage clamped at its resting membrane potential using KCl-based internal solution.

GABAB-mediated IPSPs were measured in the presence of CNQX and APV. Combined GABAA and GABAB IPSPs were elicited with a train of extracellular current pulses injected into the input fibers of the dendritic layers (layer 1–2 border) of neurons in layer 4. Pulse trains consisted of nine 2-ms-duration pulses separated by 50 ms (Johannes et al. 1995Go). GABAB IPSPs were blocked with CGP-35348 (100 µM) and the remaining GABAA responses were blocked with picrotoxin (100 µM).

It has been shown that acid-sensitive two-pore K+ channels (TASK or K2P3.1) are blocked with acidic pH (7.0–6.0) (Gutman et al. 2003Go; Talley et al. 2003Go). We used a HEPES-based ACSF solution containing NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, HEPES, glucose, and CaCl2 in the following mM concentrations: 130, 3, 2, 10, 10, and 2 (300 ± 5 mOsm) to easily modify our ACSF. Normal HEPES-based ACSF was replaced with acidic (pH 6.0–6.5) HEPES-based ASCF to block TASK channels (K2P3.1).

Histology

To perform histological reconstructions the internal solution contained 0.5 to 1% neurobiotin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Slices were processed with the Elite VectaStain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) according to the protocol described by Hamam and Kennedy (2003)Go. Stained slices were mounted wet with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Digital images were reconstructed using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA) to determine cell morphology and the presence of dendritic spines.

Data collection and analysis

Average electrode series resistance ranged from 10 to 30 M{Omega} after break in. The seal impedance of whole cell recordings ranged from 1 to 3 G{Omega}. Resting membrane potentials ranged from –55 to –75 mV. Recordings with seals <1 G{Omega} or resting membrane potentials greater than –55 mV were not included in the analysis. In voltage-clamp experiments, access resistance was monitored using a 20-ms voltage-step deviation from the holding potential and repeated throughout the duration of the recording.

All data analysis was performed using custom-written functions in Matlab Release 12 (The MathWorks, Natick, MA). All statistics are expressed as the mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance of data from control and urethane groups was determined using the Student's t-test. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences from three or more groups. Time-locked current and voltage traces were averaged in Matlab to produce mean evoked IPSCs and EPSPs. Spontaneous IPSCs were fitted with an exponential equation to determine the decay time constant estimated from the time of the IPSC peak.

Animals/chemicals

All rats were obtained from Charles Rivers Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Chemicals for the ACSF were reagent grade or better and obtained from J. T. Baker (Philadelphia, PA) or Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).


 RESULTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The effects of urethane were investigated on neurons in input layer 4 of rat visual cortex. Each neuron was initially characterized according to its spiking response (Connors and Gutnick 1990Go; Connors et al. 1982Go; Kawaguchi 1995Go; McCormick et al. 1985Go). Those cells that were determined to be regular-spiking (RS) excitatory cells were characterized for intrinsic cellular excitability and synaptic transmission. Many neurons were filled with neurobiotin and histologically processed to identify them anatomically as pyramidal neurons (see Fig. 11A).


Figure 11
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11. Effects of urethane on physiologically and anatomically identified excitatory pyramidal neurons. A: camera lucida reconstructions of neurobiotin-filled example neurons from a sample of 30 reconstructed neurons in the study. Representative examples of excitatory pyramidal neurons and interneurons recorded. Pyramidal neurons were easily identifiable and homogeneous compared with the interneuron population. B: population summary of pharmacological reversal effects on urethane-induced spike-rate depression. Reversal of urethane-dependent spike-rate depression is shown here as the percentage recovery of firing rate from urethane-depressed levels. Vertical error bars represent SE (n = 5). Asterisks indicate those conditions (Ba2+ and TEA) where channel blockers significantly reversed the spike-rate depression induced by urethane (P < 0.01, ANOVA).

 
Urethane depressed neuron excitability

Initial observations revealed a consistent depressive effect of urethane on spike responses but not on synaptic responses of pyramidal neurons in the rat neocortex. Spike rates were reduced when urethane (10 mM) was bath applied to whole cell patch-clamped neurons recorded in current-clamp mode (Fig. 1A). Spike-rate depression was reversible after a 30-min wash (Fig. 1A). We tested intrinsic excitability by applying constant-amplitude 1-s current steps with amplitudes optimized to produce moderate spike rates (7–12 spikes) and repeated 35 times. Blank periods with a minimum duration of 15 s were interdigitated between current steps.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effects of urethane on intrinsic membrane excitability and synaptic responses. A: representative membrane potential recording of an excitatory pyramidal neuron in layer 4 of rat visual cortex. Resting membrane potentials are indicated by values to the left of each group of voltage traces. In the presence of urethane (10 mM), the action potential discharge rates were depressed. Spike-rate depression was reversible after 30 min of wash. B: current–response function is shown for control conditions and in the presence of urethane for an additional representative neuron (open circles and filled circles, respectively). Dashed and solid lines represent a least-squares fit to the data for control and urethane conditions, respectively. In the presence of urethane there was a decrease in the magnitude of the response and the response gain (slope of the current–response function). C: concentration–effect relationship for urethane effects on spike rate. Horizontal dashed line indicates the control spike rate. Dotted line represents a Hill equation fitted to the data. D: current (Istep)–voltage (Vm) relationship for a representative neuron (control, urethane, and wash conditions shown as closed circles, open circles, and open squares, respectively). Urethane reversibly decreased the input resistance (dVm/dIstep) of the cell relative to control. E: action potentials were not appreciably affected by urethane. Representative action potentials shown averaged over all action potentials elicited by a 1-s depolarizing current step (n = 35) for control and urethane conditions (solid and dashed lines, respectively). F: urethane did not alter monosynaptically evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) shown averaged over 5 repeats. G: synaptically evoked paired-pulse stimulation showed no difference in the presence of urethane compared with control (n = 35 repeats).

 
An increased shunting conductance turned on by urethane was evident in the current–response functions (Fig. 1B). The absolute response was depressed in the presence of urethane and the response gain or slope of the fI curve was reduced. Urethane decreased membrane-induced resistance, observed by measuring the slope of the voltage–current relationships (Fig. 1D). Effects on input resistance were reversible after washout.

The dose–response curve for spike-rate depression showed that urethane acts in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1C, n = 25) with an IC50 for spike depression of 2–4 mM. Although this IC50 is on the low end of concentrations used in vivo to produce surgical anesthesia (0.26–1.3 g/kg corresponding to 3–15 mM; Coffey et al. 2002Go; Heynen et al. 2003Go; Ohki et al. 2005Go; Petersen et al. 2003Go), maximum effects on spike-rate depression required concentrations in excess of 8 mM. Each cell was exposed to increasing concentrations of urethane ≤15 mM.

The amplitudes or half-widths of individual action potentials were not appreciably altered in the presence of urethane (Fig. 1E). Initial observations also indicated that monosynaptic EPSPs were not affected by application of urethane as revealed by evoked EPSP slope in response to minimal stimulation (Fig. 1F). Responses after paired-pulse stimulation showed no change in synaptic depression or facilitation (Fig. 1G).

Across the population of cells studied (n = 77), 43 of the cells (56%) showed a ≥20% decrease in the action potential firing rate in the presence of urethane (3–10 mM; Fig. 2A). The remaining population of cells (n = 34) showed no change in firing rate in the presence of urethane [mean % difference (control – treated) = 4 ± 26%]. For those cells with a ≥20% spike-rate depression in the presence of urethane (3–10 mM), there was a 74 ± 20% significant decrease in the mean firing rate (Fig. 2B; P < 0.01, t-test). There was also a significant change in the firing rate across the entire population [n = 77; mean % difference (control – treated) = 43 ± 38%; P < 0.01, t-test].


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Population analysis of urethane effects on membrane and synaptic neuronal response properties. A: action potential firing rates are shown in the presence of urethane vs. the control condition. Closed circles represent those cells with a ≥20% decrease in the firing rate (n = 43) and open circles represent those cells with a decrease of <20% in the firing rate (n = 34). Solid and dashed lines represent the unity ratio line and ±20% of unity, respectively. B: for those cells with a decrease in firing rate ({Delta}Rate >20%) in the presence of urethane, there was an average decrease of 74 ± 20% (P < 0.01, t-test). C: percentage change in input slope resistance ({Delta}Rin, control – urethane) is shown for the same sample of cells shown in B. In the presence of urethane there was a significant (P < 0.01, t-test) decrease in input resistance (18 ± 14%). D: population summary of the percentage change in chord resistance [(control – urethane) x 100] measured near spike threshold (n = 37). There was a significant (P < 0.01, t-test) and pronounced percentage decrease in input chord resistance of 29 ± 20%. E: there was no change in mean resting membrane potential (Vm) (mean = –2%; t-test, P > 0.05) in the presence of urethane compared with control for the cells in B. F: percentage change in the paired-pulse stimulation responses ({Delta}PP) are shown as the %EPSP slope ratio [(pulse 2/pulse 1) x 100]. On average (mean = –5 ± 23%), there was no difference across the entire population of cells tested (n = 67). G: percentage change in slope for synaptically evoked EPSPs is shown (control – urethane). On average (–6 ± 40%), there was little difference in EPSP slope (n = 67). H: summary of the results in BG with means and SDs shown as percentage of control condition (measures that are significantly different from control: **P < 0.01, t-test).

 
Effects on membrane electrical properties

Intrinsic membrane properties were analyzed for those cells that showed a ≥20% spike depression in the presence of urethane (n = 43, Fig. 2, CE). Slope resistance for each cell was determined from steady-state current–voltage responses (500–900 ms after the onset of the 1-s-long current step, 0–20 mV hyperpolarized from resting membrane potential). Slope resistance was significantly decreased in the presence of urethane [mean % difference (control – treated) = 18 ± 14%;P < 0.01, t-test; Fig. 2C]. When the entire population of cells (n = 77) was considered there was no change in the mean slope resistance [mean % difference (control – treated) = 9 ± 18%]. Cells that showed <20% spike-rate depression (n = 34) also showed no change in slope resistance [mean % difference (control – treated) = –3 ± 16%]. There was a significant decrease in slope resistance only for cells that exhibited a decrease in firing rate in the presence of urethane. We also found no consistent effect of urethane on initial sag currents (data not shown).

There was even greater decrease in input resistance in the presence of urethane when estimated from chord resistance measures for responses near spiking threshold (Fig. 2D). Steady-state responses were measured 500–900 ms after onset of the 1-s-long current step. Chord resistance was significantly decreased (29 ± 20%; P < 0.01, t-test) in the presence of urethane. When the entire population was considered (n = 56), there was no significant change in the chord resistance under urethane [mean % difference (control – treated) = 11 ± 30%; P > 0.05, t-test]. For cells that showed <20% spike-rate depression (n = 19) there was also no significant change in chord resistance [mean % difference (control – treated) = –16 ± 20%; P > 0.05, Wilcox ranked-sum test].

Decreased input resistance in the presence of urethane suggests that urethane increased membrane conductance by opening ion channels. The effects of urethane on resting membrane potential were considered (35 repeats, averaged over 500 ms). Urethane appeared to have no significant effect on resting membrane potential [% difference (control – treated) = –2 ± 5%; P > 0.05, Wilcox ranked-sum test; Fig. 2E] for cells that showed ≥20% spike-rate depression (n = 43) or for the entire population [mean % difference (control – treated) = –0.4 ± 5%; P > 0.05, t-test, n = 77].

Effects on excitatory synapses

To determine the effects of urethane on excitatory synaptic transmission, we evoked monosynaptic EPSPs through extracellular current pulse stimulation of input fibers near the dendrites of pyramidal cells in layers 1/2. Monosynaptic responses were estimated as the initial EPSP slope fitted for responses from baseline to 80% of peak response (Fig. 1F). There was no significant change in EPSP slope in the presence of urethane [n = 67; mean % difference (control – treated) = –6 ± 40%; P > 0.05, t-test; Fig. 2, G and H]. The EPSP slope ratio (pulse 2/pulse 1) from paired-pulse stimulation was also unaffected in the presence of urethane [mean % difference (control – treated) = –5 ± 23%; Fig. 2, F and H].

Voltage-clamp analysis

Current responses were measured in the presence of urethane (10 mM) for a subpopulation of the neurons that showed spike-rate depression (Fig. 3). Membrane potentials were voltage clamped at resting level and current responses were collected in response to 2-s-long voltage steps (Fig. 3A). Resulting currents (urethane – control; 1 to 1.5 s after the beginning of the test step; Fig. 3A) were tonic and positive, indicating that urethane produced a steady-state conductance increase. The current–voltage relationship indicated that urethane increased the input conductance in a linear fashion (Fig. 3, B and C).


Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Urethane produced a tonic conductance increase in voltage-clamp recordings. A: underlying currents resulting from application of urethane for a representative cell that exhibited reduction in spike rate in the presence of urethane. Each current trace shown was averaged from 10 repeats of voltage steps either above or below resting membrane potential. Currents resulting from 2-s-long voltage steps from resting potential are shown for control and urethane conditions. Bottom: currents produced by urethane are shown with control currents subtracted. B: current–voltage (IV) relationships are shown for urethane and control conditions (open and closed circles, respectively). C: IV relationship for currents produced by urethane with control currents subtracted (gray circles).

 
GABA receptor

Urethane produced a spike-rate depression in pyramidal neurons through a tonic leak conductance increase, or shunting inhibition, with no effect on properties of individual action potentials. To determine the mechanism of shunting inhibition, we attempted to reverse the spike-rate depression by bath-applying a GABAA receptor antagonist or Cl channel blocker in the presence of urethane (Bieda and MacIver 2004Go). Adding the GABAA-specific antagonist gabazine (20 µm) to urethane-depressed neurons (n = 6) did not reverse the spike-rate depression (Figs. 4A and 8B). Gabazine's blocking effect on tonic GABAA currents could be seen as an increase in the cell's input resistance (n = 5, Figs. 4A and 8B). However, there was no significant reversal of urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (mean % recovery = –6 ± 3%). The Cl channel blocker picrotoxin (100 µm) also did not reverse the spike-rate depression produced in the presence of urethane (mean % recovery = –5 ± 8%; n = 5; Figs. 4B and 8B).


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Role of enhanced {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–mediated synaptic inhibition in urethane-induced neuronal spike-rate depression was studied using a specific GABA type A (GABAA) receptor antagonist as well as a Cl channel blocker. A: membrane potential recordings of a representative neuron that displayed spike-rate depression in the presence of urethane (membrane potentials are indicated by the values to the left of each group of voltage traces). Voltage traces are also shown in the presence of urethane and the GABAA-receptor antagonist gabazine. Gabazine decreased the conductance of the cell, but did not reverse the effects of urethane. B: urethane application produced a marked reduction in spike rate that was not reversed by application of the Cl channel blocker picrotoxin.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Specificity of Ba2+ in blocking urethane-induced spike-rate depression. Effects of urethane were blocked by adding Ba2+ before combining with urethane. A: representative example neuron that showed a block of the urethane induced spike-rate depression by preapplication with Ba2+. Urethane alone (10 mM) produced spike-rate depression. B: population summary (n = 8) of the effects of preapplication with Ba2+ in preventing urethane-induced spike-rate depression and recovery of the effect with urethane alone (10 mM).

 
GABA synapses

Urethane's action on synaptic inhibition was investigated for electrically evoked IPSCs as well as spontaneous IPSCs (Figs. 5 and 6). IPSCs were isolated using a KCl-based internal solution containing QX-314 and by including APV and CNQX in bath ACSF (see METHODS). Averaged IPSC responses (n = 10) showed no difference in shape or amplitude in the presence of urethane (6–10 mM urethane, Fig. 5A). Picrotoxin (200 µM) added to the bath completely eliminated IPSCs, verifying that responses were Cl-dependent IPSCs (Fig. 5A).


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Urethane did not appear to alter GABA-mediated evoked synaptic inhibition. A: there did not appear to be any difference in shape or amplitude of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) in the presence of urethane. Representative averaged (n = 10) IPSC responses are shown in the presence of urethane (gray line) and in the control condition (bottom black line). IPSCs were completely eliminated by the application of picrotoxin (top black line). B: urethane did not appear to alter GABAB-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs). IPSPs are shown for control and urethane-treated conditions (dashed line and thick gray line, respectively). GABAB-mediated IPSPs were blocked with CGP (100 µM, thin gray line). Remaining GABAA-mediated IPSPs were blocked by picrotoxin (150 µM, thin black line).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effects of urethane on spontaneous IPSCs. A: representative current recordings showing IPSCs in control and urethane-exposed conditions. Urethane failed to alter the amplitude or time course of individual spontaneous ISPCs. B: population average of spontaneous IPSCs recorded within 30 s for a representative neuron in control and urethane-exposed conditions (solid and dashed lines, respectively). Averages were time aligned to the peak of the IPSCs. Dotted lines indicate current (mean ± SD). C: population averages (n = 12 cells) for sample recordings (30 s) are shown for spontaneous IPSC rate (control = 6.0 ± 3.3 Hz, urethane = 5.9 ± 2.9 Hz), amplitude (control = 34 ± 28 pA, urethane = 36 ± 25 pA), and decay time constant {tau} (control = 10.0 ± 3.5 ms, urethane = 11.0 ± 3.9 ms). Decay time constants were estimated from exponential fits of the IPSC decay from peak response.

 
GABAB-mediated IPSPs were not appreciably affected by the presence of urethane (10 mM) in amplitude or decay time constant (Fig. 5B). GABAB-mediated IPSPs (n = 6) were collected in response to a train of extracellular current pulses delivered to input fibers of the distal dendritic region (border of layers 1/2) of neurons in layer 4, to selectively activate GABAB synapses (Johannes et al. 1995Go) (see METHODS). GABAB-mediated IPSPs were blocked with CGP (100 µM) and the remaining GABAA responses were blocked with picrotoxin (150 µM).

Effects of urethane on spontaneous IPSCs were measured in a subpopulation of cells (n = 12, Fig. 6A). Spontaneous events recorded in control (n = 165 events) and urethane-exposed conditions (n = 172 events) (10 mM) were averaged over 30 s of recording (Fig. 6B). The average IPSCs were indistinguishable between the control and urethane conditions and well within the response variability (Fig. 6B, dotted lines represent ± SD). Estimates from population averages indicated that there were no significant differences between control and urethane-exposed IPSCs as quantified by mean rate (control = 6.0 ± 3.3 Hz, urethane = 5.9 ± 2.9 Hz, P > 0.05, t-test), mean amplitude (control = 34 ± 28 pA, urethane = 36 ± 25 pA, P > 0.05, t-test), and decay time constant {tau} (control = 10.0 ± 3.5 ms, urethane = 11.0 ± 3.9 ms, P > 0.05, t-test; Fig. 6C).

K+ channels

We studied K+ channels as possible mechanisms for action potential depression and tonic background conductance increases produced by urethane. The broad-spectrum K+ channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA) was used to test for K+ channel involvement in spike-rate depression elicited by urethane (n = 12). Relatively high concentrations (>20 mM) of TEA were successful at reversing spike-rate depression (Fig. 7A). TEA significantly (P < 0.01, t-test) reversed spike-rate depression in 11 of 12 cells by 35 ± 10% (see also Fig. 11B). Individual action potential half-widths were increased in the presence of TEA, consistent with a block of delayed rectifying K+ currents, among others.


Figure 7
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Increased K+ conductance appears to account for urethane-dependent spike-rate depression. Membrane potential response of a representative neuron to a fixed-amplitude 1-s current injection. Resting membrane potentials are indicated by the values to the left of each voltage trace. Spike raster plots are shown below each membrane potential recording for 35 repeats. A: adding the broad-spectrum K+ blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA, 20 mM) reversed urethane-dependent spike-rate depression. B: spike-rate depression was reversed when Ba2+ (100 µM) was added to the perfusion in the presence of urethane.

 
To more specifically identify the mechanism of urethane's spike-rate adaptation, we tested increasingly selective K+ channel blockers (Gutman et al. 2003Go). Ba2+ at low concentrations (<2 mM) is known to selectively block K+ channels that contribute to the resting membrane potential such as the inward rectifier family and the two-pore family (K2P) (Goldstein et al. 2001Go; Gutman et al. 2003Go; Patel and Honore 2001Go). When low concentrations of Ba2+ (50–150 µM) were added to the perfusate of neurons that demonstrated urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (>20%), there was a significant reversal of the spike-rate depression (81 ± 7%; P < 0.01, t-test; Figs. 7B, 8, and 11B). Individual action potentials were not affected in shape or amplitude, indicating that urethane-induced depression does not involve effects on delayed rectifier K+ currents (Fig. 7B).

To test for the specificity of Ba2+ reversal of spike-rate depression, Ba2+ was added before urethane (Fig. 8A). Adding Ba2+ at low concentrations (150 µM) did not significantly increase the firing rate within our sample of cortical pyramidal neurons (n = 8, P > 0.05, t-test; Fig. 8, B and C). When urethane was added to the perfusate in the presence of Ba2+, there was no significant difference in the firing rate compared with control (P > 0.05, t-test; Fig. 8, B and C). However, after switching to urethane without Ba2+ there was a significant spike-rate depression (>50% of control, P < 0.01, t-test) in five of eight cells (Fig. 8, B and C).

We examined underlying current responses for cells that exhibited urethane induced spike-rate depression. For cells that showed spike-rate depression in the presence of urethane (10 mM), there was a significant increase in the slope conductance (150 ± 25%; P < 0.01, t-test, see Fig. 9, inset indicated by **). Ba2+ (150 µM) reversed the urethane-induced conductance increase and the resulting slope was not different from control slope (88 ± 14%; Fig. 9, inset).


Figure 9
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Ba2+ blocked the increased leak conductance produced by urethane. IV relationships are shown for a representative neuron in control and urethane-exposed conditions (open circles and gray circles, respectively). Urethane (10 mM) produced a linear conductance increase. Ba2+ (150 µM) reversed the conductance increase induced by urethane (black squares with dotted line). Inset: population averages (n = 6) of input slope resistance (Rin slope) relative to control for urethane-exposed conditions (149 ± 24%, P < 0.01, t-test) and reversal by Ba2+.

 
Several other K+ channel blockers failed to reverse urethane-induced spike-rate depression. The broad-spectrum K+ channel blocker 4-AP (1 mM) did not reverse firing-rate depression (n = 5, Fig. 10A). The reduction in firing rate after adding 4-AP in Fig. 10A likely resulted from continued increase in urethane's action over time.


Figure 10
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. Representative examples of K+ channel blockers that were ineffective at reversing urethane-induced spike-rate depression. A: broad-spectrum K+ channel blocker 4-AP (1 mM) did not reverse the effects of urethane on intrinsic spike rate. B: low concentrations of Cs+ (100–200 µM) were also not successful at reversing urethane-induced spike-rate depression.

 
Cs+ has been shown to block inward-rectifier K+ channels with low concentrations (100 µM) (Gutman et al. 2003Go; Soh and Park 2001Go). However, Cs+ (100 µM) was also ineffective at reversing urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (n = 5, Fig. 10B). When Cs+ was added to neurons as a control, it caused a significant increase in firing rate (15 ± 9%, P < 0.01, t-test) in the absence of urethane despite not reversing urethane-induced spike-rate depression.

Spike frequency adaptation–related K+ currents (IM) did not appear to contribute to urethane-dependent spike-rate depression. In a subpopulation of the sampled cells (n = 5), we tested reversibility of urethane-dependent spike-rate depression with the IM channel blockers XE991 and linopirdine (Aiken et al. 1995Go; Schnee and Brown 1998Go; Wang et al. 1998Go) (15 and 20 µM, respectively; Fig. 11B). Neither reversed urethane-dependent spike-rate depression when added to the perfusate.

The role of acid-sensitive two-pore K+ channels (TASK or K2P3.1) in urethane-induced spike-rate depression was tested by decreasing the ACSF pH (pH 6.0–6.5; see METHODS) (Talley et al. 2003Go). Acidic ACSF did not reverse urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (n = 4, Fig. 11B). An additional test of TASK (K2P3.1) channel involvement in urethane's actions was made by determining the reversibility produced by low concentrations of bupivacaine (20 µM, Fig. 11B) (Meuthw et al. 2003Go). Bupivacaine did not reverse the urethane-dependent spike-rate depression.

Pyramidal neurons of rat visual cortex provided a homogeneous and relevant population of neurons for studying the effects of urethane. Cell type was verified both physiologically and anatomically in a subset of neurons (n = 30) through neurobiotin loading and histological reconstruction (Fig. 11A). There was agreement between physiological (Connors and Gutnick 1990Go; Connors et al. 1982Go; Kawaguchi 1995Go; McCormick et al. 1985Go) (based on spike responses) and anatomical classification of these cells (Azouz et al. 1997Go; Nowak et al. 2003Go). For a small sample of inhibitory cells recorded (n = 10), none showed significant urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (mean % depression = 3 ± 12%, n = 10, P > 0.05, t-test). However, with the diversity of inhibitory cell types and the small sample of inhibitory cells tested, future experiments will be required to conclude that inhibitory cells are urethane insensitive.


 DISCUSSION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study found that urethane depressed the intrinsic excitability of layer 4 cortical neurons and increased input conductance. Neurons showed a consistent decrease in their action potential firing rate in the presence of urethane combined with an increase in tonic background conductance. Action potential amplitudes, half-widths, or afterhyperpolarization characteristics were not affected. Urethane (3–15 mM) produced spike-rate depression of ≥20% of control rate in over 50% of the cells studied (n = 77) with surgically relevant concentrations (Coffey et al. 2002Go; Hara and Harris 2002Go; Heynen et al. 2003Go; Koblin 2002Go; Ohki et al. 2005Go; Petersen et al. 2003Go) (0.26 and 1.5 g/kg ip corresponding to 3–15 mM, respectively).

Urethane did not appear to have an influence on excitatory or inhibitory synaptic transmission at physiologically relevant concentrations (<15 mM). EPSPs and IPSCs showed no difference in amplitude or decay time course in the presence of urethane. There was also no observable difference in the frequency, amplitude, or time course of spontaneous GABAA IPSCs or GABAB-mediated IPSPs. Unlike the effects observed for recombinant neurotransmistter receptors in frog oocytes (Hara and Harris 2002Go; Koblin 2002Go), neocortical pyramidal cell synaptic responses were not altered by urethane. This discrepancy most likely results from differences in the density and distribution of ion channels between transfected cells and pyramidal neurons.

Spike-rate depression observed in the presence of urethane appeared to be mediated by a background K+ leak conductance. In the presence of urethane, pyramidal neurons that showed spike-rate depression also showed significant decreases in their input resistance. Overall, urethane produced a change in the slope of the fI curve as well as a rightward shift (Fig. 1B). The opening of background leak ion channels changed the input resistance and caused a divisive change in firing rate that suppressed the maximum firing rate. There was not a consistent hyperpolarization of the resting membrane potential nor a pure rightward shift in the fI curve as would result from a hyperpolarization without a change in the input resistance. This could have resulted from the opening of nonselective K+ channels or from multiple types of K+ channels.

Changes in input resistance were not strongly correlated with changes in spiking when compared directly (r2 = 0.42). This is not surprising given the nonlinear relationship between membrane conductance change and spike encoding. For example, if the channels contributing to the effect were located at the axon hillock they could have a much greater effect on spiking than if they were located on the distal dendrites.

In voltage-clamp recordings this conductance increase was tonic and linear over the voltage range tested. Blocking neither GABAA-mediated currents nor Cl channels reversed the effects of this urethane-induced leak conductance (Figs. 4 and 11B). However, K+ channel blockers TEA (>20 mM) and Ba2+ (50–150 µM) reversed urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (Figs. 7A and 11B).

Through the use of pharmacological blockers, urethane effects on several K+ channel families could be ruled out. Voltage-gated K+ channels showed no obvious involvement in the actions of urethane because the effects were insensitive to 4-AP and relatively insensitive to TEA (effects observed only at concentrations >20 mM). Urethane-induced currents showed no obvious inward rectification (Fig. 3) and were not blocked by Cs+ (Figs. 10 and 11B). Therefore inward rectifier K+ channels (Kir) could be ruled out. Urethane-dependent spike depression was also independent of delayed rectifier K+ channels (KCNQ/M) because neither XE991 nor linopirdine (Aiken et al. 1995Go; Schnee and Brown 1998Go; Wang et al. 1998Go) reversed the urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (Fig. 11B).

Neither acidic ACSF (pH 6.0–6.5) nor low concentrations of bupivacaine (Meuthw et al. 2003Go) (20 µM) reversed the urethane-dependent spike-rate depression (Fig. 11B). Therefore the two-pore acid-sensitive K+ channels (TASK or K2P3.1) did not appear to be the dominant mechanism of urethane-induced spike-rate depression.

Calcium-activated K+ channels (KCa) were also ruled out as the mechanism of urethane action because these currents show inward rectified current–voltage responses (Kohler et al. 1996Go; Lancaster et al. 1991Go; Soh and Park 2001Go ; Vogalis et al. 2003Go; Xia et al. 1998Go). Also unlike the classical anesthesia-related K+ current, IKAn (Franks and Honore 2004Go; Patel and Honore 2003Go; Patel et al. 1999Go), the urethane-induced K+ leak conductance did not show typical outward rectification; instead it had a linear current–voltage relationship.

K+ leak conductances have been attributed to three possible K+ channel families including: inward rectifier, delayed rectifier, and two-pore K+ channels (Franks and Lieb 1999Go; Goldstein et al. 2001Go; Gutman et al. 2003Go; Lesage 2003Go; Yost 1999Go, 2000Go, 2003Go). Of the three possible K+ channel families associated with K+ leak currents found in the neocortex, we have ruled out inward rectifiers (Kir) and delayed rectifiers (KCNQ/M). The remaining possibility is the K+ leak currents associated with the two-pore family. Within the two-pore family of channels, we have also ruled out acid-sensitive channels (TASK) because neither acidic ACSF nor bupivacaine reversed urethane-dependent spike-rate depression. The Ba2+ sensitivity (reversal at 50–150 µM) and linear current–voltage relationship of the urethane current is consistent with other two-pore K+ channels such as TWIK (Goldstein et al. 2001Go; Gutman et al. 2003Go; Patel and Honore 2001Go) (K2P1.1); however, more specific pharmacological blockers of these channels are needed to definitively determine whether one or more two-pore K+ channels are activated by urethane.

The action of urethane on excitatory neocortical pyramidal neurons appears to be specifically through the opening of Ba2+-sensitive K+ leak currents. Urethane's action was independent of Cl channels with no effect on excitatory or inhibitory synaptic transmission. Although volatile general anesthetics have been shown to activate background two-pore K+ channels, TREK-1 (K2P2.1) and TASK (Patel et al. 1999Go) (K2P3.1), these classical IKAn currents do not appear to contribute to urethane's action. Urethane-induced spike-rate depression was not reversed by blocking TASK channels and the Ba2+ sensitivity of the urethane current is inconsistent with that of TREK-1 channels (Patel and Honore 2001Go). However, the urethane-activated current is similar to a K+ leak conductance induced by isoflurane in thalamocortical neurons (Ries and Puil 1999Go).

The effectiveness of urethane as an anesthetic for in vivo electrophysiological recordings comes from the observation that it produces minimal depression of sensory evoked responses or signal transmission in EEG recordings while maintaining a surgical level of anesthesia (Albrecht and Davidowa 1989Go; Dringenberg and Vanderwolf 1995Go; Maggi and Meli 1986Go; Moore and Appenteng 1990Go). It has also been reported that urethane depresses cortical single-cell responsiveness (Girman et al. 1999Go). The actions of urethane to increase a shunting K+ background leak conductance combined with the lack of effect on either excitatory or inhibitory synaptic transmission are consistent with both observations.

Therefore unlike other anesthetics like isoflurane and barbiturates, which alter the time course of synaptic transmission and functional visual receptive field properties (Ries and Puil 1999Go; Villeneuve and Casanova 2003Go), urethane's action on neocortical pyramidal cells can be thought of as a tonic reduction of intrinsic excitability through a specific K+ background leak conductance. Because urethane does not affect synaptic responses, the K+ channel action can be thought of as a scaling of the unaffected inputs. However, it is not a simple linear scaling because urethane does not just hyperpolarize the cell—it causes a gain change in the fI curve (see Fig. 1). Therefore urethane produces a nonlinear divisive scaling of synaptic inputs.

It is known that background synaptic activity and voltage-gated channels may contribute to firing rate input/output response characteristics (Chance et al. 2002Go; Mitchell and Silver 2003Go). Dynamic-clamp techniques that inject conductance rather than current and allow for simulated in vivo–like background activity could be used to address these issues. Additional experiments are also needed to address urethane's action at subcortical levels and on inhibitory cell subtypes within the cortex to understand urethanes's effects on early visual processing. However, the findings presented here—that urethane's action is specifically on intrinsic membrane properties rather than synaptic responses—is a significant advance toward a more complete understanding of in vivo recordings made in urethane-anesthetized preparations. Our results provide a starting point to model the influence of urethane on systems level processing.


 FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. P. Sceniak, Dept. of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Room S288, Stanford, CA 94305-5117 (E-mail: sceniak{at}stanford.edu)


 REFERENCES
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Aiken SP, Lampe BJ, Murphy PA, and Brown BS. Reduction of spike frequency adaptation and blockade of M-current in rat CA1 pyramidal neurones by linopirdine (DuP 996), a neurotransmitter release enhancer. Br J Pharmacol 115: 1163–1168, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]

Albrecht D and Davidowa H. Action of urethane on dorsal lateral geniculate neurons. Brain Res Bull 22: 923–927, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Azouz R, Gray CM, Nowak LG, and McCormick DA. Physiological properties of inhibitory interneurons in cat striate cortex. Cereb Cortex 7: 534–545, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bieda MC and MacIver MB. Major role for tonic GABAA conductances in anesthetic suppression of intrinsic neuronal excitability. J Neurophysiol 92: 1658–1667, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bindman LJ, Meyer T, and Prince CA. Comparison of the electrical properties of neocortical neurones in slices in vitro and in the anaesthetized rat. Exp Brain Res 69: 489–496, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chance FS, Abbott LF, and Reyes AD. Gain modulation from background synaptic input. Neuron 35: 773–782, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Coffey PJ, Girman S, Wang SM, Hetherington L, Keegan DJ, Adamson P, Greenwood J, and Lund RD. Long-term preservation of cortically dependent visual function in RCS rats by transplantation. Nat Neurosci 5: 53–56, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Connors BW and Gutnick MJ. Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons. Trends Neurosci 13: 99–104, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Connors BW, Gutnick MJ, and Prince DA. Electrophysiological properties of neocortical neurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 48: 1302–1320, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dringenberg HC and Vanderwolf CH. Some general anesthetics reduce serotonergic neocortical activation and enhance the action of serotonergic antagonists. Brain Res Bull 36: 285–292, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Dyer RS and Rigdon GC. Urethane affects the rat visual system at subanesthetic doses. Physiol Behav 41: 327–330, 1987.[CrossRef][Medline]

Franks NP and Honore E. The TREK K2P channels and their role in general anaesthesia and neuroprotection. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25: 601–608, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]

Franks NP and Lieb WR. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of general anaesthesia. Nature 367: 607–614, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]

Franks NP and Lieb WR. Background K+ channels: an important target for volatile anesthetics? Nat Neurosci 2: 395–396, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Girman SV, Sauve Y, and Lund RD. Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 82: 301–311, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goldstein SA, Bockenhauer D, O'Kelly I, and Zilberberg N. Potassium leak channels and the KCNK family of two-P-domain subunits. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 175–184, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gutman GA, Chandy KG, Adelman JP, Aiyar J, Bayliss DA, Clapham DE, Covarriubias M, Desir GV, Furuichi K, Ganetzky B, Garcia ML, Grissmer S, Jan LY, Karschin A, Kim D, Kuperschmidt S, Kurachi Y, Lazdunski M, Lesage F, Lester HA, McKinnon D, Nichols CG, O’Kelly I, Robbins J, Robertson GA, Rudy B, Sanguinetti M, Seino S, Stuehmer W, Tamkun MM, Vandenberg CA, Wei A, Wulff H, Wymore RS; International Union of Pharmacology. International Union of Pharmacology. XLI. Compendium of voltage-gated ion channels: potassium channels. Pharmacol Rev 55: 583–586, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamam BN and Kennedy TE. Visualization of the dendritic arbor of neurons in intact 500 micron thick brain slices. J Neurosci Methods 123: 61–67, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hara K and Harris RA. The anesthetic mechanism of urethane: the effects on neurotransmitter-gated ion channels. Anesth Analg 94: 313–318, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heynen AJ, Yoon BJ, Liu CH, Chung HJ, Huganir RL, and Bear MF. Molecular mechanism for loss of visual cortical responsiveness following brief monocular deprivation. Nat Neurosci 6: 854–862, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ikeda H and Wright MJ. Sensitivity of neurones in visual cortex (area 17) under different levels of anaesthesia. Exp Brain Res 20: 471–484, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]

Johannes FM, vanBrederode JF, and Spain WJ. Differences in inhibitory synaptic input between layer II–III and layer V neurons of the cat neocortex. J Neurophysiol 74: 1149–1166, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kawaguchi Y. Physiological subgroups of nonpyramidal cells with specific morphological characteristics in layer II/III of rat frontal cortex. Neuroscience 15: 2638–2655, 1995.[Medline]

Koblin DD. Urethane: help or hindrance? Anesth Analg 94: 241–242, 2002.[Free Full Text]

Kohler M, Hirschberg B, Bond CT, Kinzie JM, Marrion NV, Maylie J, and Adelman JP. Small-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels from mammalian brain. Science 273: 1709–1714, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lancaster B, Nicoll RA, and Perkel DJ. Calcium activates two types of potassium channels in rat hippocampal neurons in culture. Neuroscience 11: 23–30, 1991.[Medline]

Lesage F. Pharmacology of neuronal background potassium channels. Neuropharmacology 44: 1–7, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maggi CA and Meli A. Suitability of urethane anesthesia for physiopharmacological investigations in various systems. Part 1: General considerations. Experientia 42: 109–114, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

McCormick DA, Connors BW, Lighthall JW, and Prince DA. Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. J Neurophysiol 54: 782–806, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mercer LF Jr, Remley NR, and Gilman DP. Effects of urethane on hippocampal unit activity in the rat. Brain Res Bull 3: 567–570, 1978.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Meuthw SG, Budde T, Kanyshkova T, Broicher T, Munsch T, and Pape HC. Contribution of TWIK-related acid-sensitive K+ channel 1 (TASK1) and TASK3 channels to the control of activity modes in thalamocortical neurons. Neuroscience 23: 6460–6469, 2003.[Medline]

Mitchell SJ and Silver RA. Shunting inhibition modulates neuronal gain during synaptic excitation. Neuron 38: 433–445, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Moore JA and Appenteng K. Contrasting effects of urethane and pentobarbitone anaesthesia on the electrical properties of rat jaw-elevator motoneurones. Brain Res 523: 139–142, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nicoll RA, Eccles JC, Oshima T, and Rubia F. Prolongation of hippocampal inhibitory postsynaptic potentials by barbiturates. Nature 258: 625–627, 1975.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nishikawa K and MacIver MB. Membrane and synaptic actions of halothane on rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons. Neuroscience 20: 5915–5923, 2000.[Medline]

Nowak LG, Azouz R, Sanchez-Vives MV, Gray CM, and McCormick DA. Electrophysiological classes of cat primary visual cortical neurons in vivo as revealed by quantitative analyses. J Neurophysiol 89: 1541–1566, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ohki K, Chung S, Ch'ng YH, Kara P, and Reid RC. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 433: 597–603, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]

Patel AJ and Honore E. Properties and modulation of mammalian 2P domain K+ channels. Trends Neurosci 24: 339–346, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Patel AJ and Honore E. 2P domain K+ channels: novel pharmacological targets for volatile general anesthetics. Adv Exp Med Biol 536: 9–23, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]

Patel AJ, Honore E, Lesage F, Fink M, Romey G, and Lazdunski M. Inhalational anesthetics activate two-pore-domain background K+ channels. Nat Neurosci 2: 422–426, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Petersen CC, Grinvald A, and Sakmann B. Spatiotemporal dynamics of sensory responses in layer 2/3 of rat barrel cortex measured in vivo by voltage-sensitive dye imaging combined with whole-cell voltage recordings and neuron reconstructions. Neuroscience 23: 1298–1309, 2003.[Medline]

Pittson S, Himmel AM, and MacIver MB. Multiple synaptic and membrane sites of anesthetic action in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. BMC Neurosci 5: 52, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ries CR and Puil E. Ionic mechanism of isoflurane's actions on thalamocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 81: 1802–1809, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schnee ME and Brown BS. Selectivity of linopirdine (DuP 996), a neurotransmitter release enhancer, in blocking voltage-dependent and calcium-activated potassium currents in hippocampal neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 286: 709–717, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Scholfield CN. Potentiation of inhibition by general anaesthetics in neurones of the olfactory cortex in vitro. Pfluegers Arch 383: 249–255, 1980.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Soh H and Park CS. Inwardly rectifying current–voltage relationship of small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels rendered by intracellular divalent cation blockade. Biophys J 80: 2207–2215, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]

Talley EM, Sirois JE, Lei Q, and Bayliss DA. Two-pore-domain (KCNK) potassium channels: dynamic roles in neuronal function. Neuroscientist 9: 46–56, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Villeneuve MY and Casanova C. On the use of isoflurane versus halothane in the study of visual response properties of single cells in the primary visual cortex. J Neurosci Methods 129: 19–31, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Vogalis F, Storm JF, and Lancaster B. SK channels and the varieties of slow after-hyperpolarizations in neurons. Eur J Neurosci 18: 3155–3166, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wang HS, Pan Z, Shi W, Brown BS, Wymore RS, Cohen IS, Dixon JE, and McKinnon D. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: molecular correlates of the M-channel. Science 282: 1890–1893, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xia XM, Fakler B, Rivard A, Wayman G, Johnson-Pais T, Keen JE, Ishii T, Hirschberg B, Bond CT, Lutsenko S, Maylie J, and Adelman JP. Mechanism of calcium gating in small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels. Nature 395: 503–507, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yost CS. Potassium channels: basic aspects, functional roles, and medical significance. Anesthesiology 90: 1186–1203, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yost CS. Tandem pore domain K channels: an important site of volatile anesthetic action? Curr Drug Targets 1: 207–217, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yost CS. Update on tandem pore (2P) domain K+ channels. Curr Drug Targets 4: 347–351, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. David-Jurgens and H. R. Dinse
Effects of Aging on Paired-Pulse Behavior of Rat Somatosensory Cortical Neurons
Cereb Cortex, September 10, 2009; (2009) bhp185v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Masri, R. L. Quiton, J. M. Lucas, P. D. Murray, S. M. Thompson, and A. Keller
Zona Incerta: A Role in Central Pain
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 181 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Ghoshal, P. Pouget, M. Popescu, and F. Ebner
Early Bilateral Sensory Deprivation Blocks the Development of Coincident Discharge in Rat Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2384 - 2392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. Brazhnik, F. Shah, and J. M. Tepper
GABAergic Afferents Activate Both GABAA and GABAB Receptors in Mouse Substantia Nigra Dopaminergic Neurons In Vivo
J. Neurosci., October 8, 2008; 28(41): 10386 - 10398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. A. S. Ewert, C. Vahle-Hinz, and A. K. Engel
High-Frequency Whisker Vibration Is Encoded by Phase-Locked Responses of Neurons in the Rat's Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci., May 14, 2008; 28(20): 5359 - 5368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. A. Graham, A. M. Brichta, and R. J. Callister
Recording Temperature Affects the Excitability of Mouse Superficial Dorsal Horn Neurons, In Vitro
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2048 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Cotillon-Williams, C. Huetz, E. Hennevin, and J.-M. Edeline
Tonotopic Control of Auditory Thalamus Frequency Tuning by Reticular Thalamic Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1137 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Potez and M. E. Larkum
Effect of Common Anesthetics on Dendritic Properties in Layer 5 Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1394 - 1407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. A. Razak and S. L. Pallas
Inhibitory Plasticity Facilitates Recovery of Stimulus Velocity Tuning in the Superior Colliculus after Chronic NMDA Receptor Blockade
J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7275 - 7283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Tu, S. Kroener, K. Abernathy, C. Lapish, J. Seamans, L. J. Chandler, and J. J. Woodward
Ethanol Inhibits Persistent Activity in Prefrontal Cortical Neurons
J. Neurosci., April 25, 2007; 27(17): 4765 - 4775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3865    most recent
01196.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sceniak, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by MacIver, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sceniak, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by MacIver, M. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.