|
|
||||||||
REPORT
1Center for Neural Dynamics, Krasnow Institute, 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, 3Program in Neuroscience, and 4Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Submitted 28 December 2005; accepted in final form 10 March 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous in vitro studies of intracellular excitatoryinhibitory (EI) interplay focused primarily on stimulation-induced epileptiform activity (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004
, 2005
; Perez-Velazquez 2003
; Perez-Velazquez and Carlen 1999
). In these paradigms, tetanic stimulation replaced preictal and ictal onset dynamics and the resulting afterdischarges demonstrated synchronous activation of inhibitory and excitatory cells (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004
). However, we know little about EI interactions and synchrony during spontaneous preictal, ictal, and postictal events.
To investigate EI, excitatoryexcitatory (EE), and inhibitoryinhibitory (II) interactions in robust seizure-like events (SLEs), we used a 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and decreased magnesium seizure model. Simultaneous dual and triple whole cell recordings of inhibitory oriens interneurons and excitatory pyramidal cells, along with extracellular potential measurements, were performed in the CA1 of rat hippocampal slices. We report a novel pattern of EI activity interplay during these spontaneous SLEs.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments were performed on SpragueDawley rats (P18P35) with a George Mason University approved protocol.
Electrophysiology
Animals were anesthetized with diethyl-ether and decapitated, brains were removed, hippocampi isolated, and transverse 350 µm sections cut in cold dissection buffer (in mM: 2.6 KCl, 1.23 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 0.1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 205 sucrose, 20 glucose) using a vibratome.
Slices were incubated for 1 h in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF; pH 7.3, 30°C, in mM: 130 NaCl, 0.6 MgSO4, 3.5 KCl, 1.2 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 2.5 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3) aerated with 95% O2-5% CO2, transferred to a submersion recording chamber (Warner Instruments), and perfused (1 ml/min, 34°C). Borosilicate glass micropipettes (47 M
) for current-clamp recordings contained (in mM): 116 K gluconate, 6 KCl, 0.5 EGTA, 20 HEPES, 10 phosphocreatine, 0.3 NaGTP, 2 NaCl, 4 MgATP, and 0.3% Neurobiotin (pH 7.25, 295 mOsm). Extracellular recordings were performed with micropipettes (13 M
, 0.9% NaCl).
Alignment of the seizure start times was based on an identifiable feature of the extracellular recordingthe fast positive extracellular shift (FPES, 15 mV, Fig. 1D). Oriens interneurons (see Supplementary Materials)1 were targeted because of their importance and vulnerability in epilepsy (Oliva et al. 2002
; Sanon et al. 2005
; Santhakumar and Soltesz 2004
) and their role in network synchronization (Gillies et al. 2002
; Pike et al. 2000
). Seven of 12 interneurons that underwent depolarization block (DB) displayed oriens-lacunosum moleculare (O-LM) interneuron membrane characteristics and bipolar horizontal dendritic morphology (Maccaferri and Lacaille 2003
; Maccaferri and McBain 1996
; see Supplementary materials). Cells selected for patching were 30200 µm apart (average 122 µm). An extracellular electrode was placed in the pyramidale near the patched cells. A subset of experiments was performed after isolating CA1 (n = 13) by making cuts from alveus to moleculare lacunosum on each side of CA1. Recordings were performed using Axoclamp 2B and 2A, MCC 700 (Molecular Devices), and Grass P16 amplifiers, filtered (5 kHz whole cell, 1 kHz extracellular) and digitized at 10 kHz (Digidata and Pclamp7, Molecular Devices).
|
200 µM) if SLE formation was not observed within 20 min. We fortuitously discovered that decreasing the Mg concentration to 0.6 mM, although insufficient by itself to promote SLEs, had a profound affect on prolonging 4-APinduced SLEs. 4-AP increases inhibitory and excitatory signaling (Avoli et al. 1988Histochemistry
Neurobiotin-filled cells were reconstructed with camera lucida (Fig. 2A and Supplementary material). For the cells that exhibited DB, outlines of the slices and stratum pyramidale were drawn using camera lucida and overlaid (to the best fit) in Adobe Photoshop (Fig. 2E).
|
To track the temporal evolution of EE and EI synchrony, two unbiased crosscorrelations were calculated using subthreshold membrane potentials and spike times of pairs of neurons over discrete time windows. We use crosscorrelation to infer the presence of synchronization (Netoff and Schiff 2002
). Dual-correlation analyses allowed us to compare synchrony in subthreshold inputs and suprathreshold neuronal outputs. Alternate methods to achieve a similar analysis used median filters to remove spikes (Buonomano 2003
; Mooney et al. 2001
), which alter the spectra and are less suitable for correlation measures.
For spike correlation, a simple threshold was used to identify discrete spike times. To measure subthreshold correlations, data between spike initiation and termination were discarded and correlations were performed using interspike data (Fig. 1, A and B). The spike data gaps were retained, leaving the time relationships among the residual subthreshold voltages unchanged. This subthreshold activity reflects not only synaptic network inputs to the cells but also intrinsic voltage-gated subthreshold responses. In contrast, spike crosscorrelation reflects neuronal output (see Supplementary material). We applied an estimate of the expected crosscorrelation variance given each time series' autocorrelation and time length. Only statistically significant correlations, greater than 2 SDs of the expected value, were included in the analysis (full details in Supplementary materials).
Statistical analysis
Averaged data representing spiking rates and crosscorrelation values are reported as mean ± SD. ANOVA was used to determine whether the means of correlation measures from distinct SLE epochs were significantly different. Post hoc Tukey multiple-comparison tests (confidence limit P < 0.001) were performed after ANOVA. Because the number of SLEs measured per cell pair was variable (518), we also recalculated averages by randomly resampling to equalize the number of SLEs compared from each pair. Both pooled and resampled averages are reported.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pyramidal cells (n = 35) fired at lower rates than interneurons before SLEs. Consistent early features of SLEs were a burst of pyramidal cell spikes (about 13 s), coinciding with the FPES in the extracellular and intracellular potentials followed by a sustained negative extracellular shift (15 mV, Fig. 1D). When multiple FPESs were seen, the final one just before the slow negative extracellular potential shift was selected as the temporal anchor point for subsequent analysis.
Sub- and suprathreshold crosscorrelation analyses of excitatory cell pairs (n = 15) revealed qualitatively different results (Fig. 1, E and F). Pyramidal cell spike output increased considerably during the SLEs (n = 15 pairs, 148 SLEs) and showed a substantial increase in spike crosscorrelation (Fig. 1E). In contrast, averaged subthreshold EE correlations (n = 15 pairs; 148 SLEs) showed significantly decreased correlations at the start of the ictal-like event (Fig. 1F). This finding is consistent with previous results in which voltage-activated conductances during similar recordings were blocked (Netoff and Schiff 2002
).
In the presence of 4-AP, oriens interneurons were more active and fired at higher frequencies than concurrently recorded pyramidal cells (Figs. 2 and 3). During SLEs, the interneurons and pyramidal cells exhibited a robust spiking interplay (Fig. 2), which took place over substantially longer timescales compared with the interplay seen in interictal bursts (see Supplementary Fig. 1).
|
Figure 3 shows an example of simultaneous EE and EI interactions during a triple whole cell and extracellular recording of a spontaneous SLE and the respective average (n = 8 SLEs) firing rates. This example illustrates that the firing rates of the two recorded pyramidal cells changed together, with peak firing rates at the onset and sustained high firing rates during the interneuron DB.
Analysis of 102 SLEs from EI pairs is shown in Fig. 3, CE (n = 12 pairs). There was an increase in EI subthreshold correlations at the beginning and toward the end of the interneuron DB. With resampling, the increase in subthreshold correlations toward the end of the SLEs was the most robust feature (Fig. 3C).
A significant increase in EI spike correlations was observed at the beginning (unweighted) and toward the end of the SLEs (weighted averages; about 45 s, Fig. 3D). These EI subthreshold and spike findings are consistent with the fact that pyramidal cells and interneurons were active together at the onset and offset of the depolarization block.
The spike rate averages (n = 12 pairs, 102 SLEs) in Fig. 3E show a consistent robust sequence, starting with intense interneuron firing, followed by a peak in pyramidal cell firing during interneuron DB, and concluding with the return of intense inhibitory firing as pyramidal activity decays. The terminal decay in pyramidal cell firing frequency is associated with the second peak and sustained firing in interneurons recovering from the block (about 35 s, Fig. 3E and inset).
Figure 4 shows an example of two interneurons participating in a SLE. Although spiking activity ceased as both interneurons entered DB, subthreshold correlation values nevertheless increased (n = 13 SLEs, three pairs). The finding that pyramidal cell spike correlations are increased during interneuron DB (Fig. 3C) is consistent with synchronous excitation contributing to the subthreshold II correlations during their DB. In contrast, the loss of inhibitory spike outputs is consistent with the decrease in EE subthreshold correlations during DB (Fig. 1F).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuronal interplay and depolarization block may have been first observed in pioneering in vivo studies of single intracellular neocortical and hippocampal seizure recordings from untyped cells (Kandel and Spencer 1961
; Matsumoto and Marsan 1964). More recently, a strong inhibitory component of seizures with increased inhibitory spiking before and after paroxysmal discharges was observed in single intracellular in vivo recordings from fast-spiking putative interneurons (Timofeev et al. 2002
). Additional recent in vivo observations have clearly shown that precisely interleaved activity of subpopulations of inhibitory cells coordinate normal hippocampal theta rhythms and sharp waves (Klausberger et al. 2003
).
Examples of in vitro EI interplay have been observed in spontaneous bursts with elevated K+ (Aradi and Maccaferri 2004
). We have also observed similar activity in our preparation (see Supplementary Fig. 1) and have observed that the spontaneous SLEs in our solution retained features of the burst EI interplay, but at the much longer timescale of seizures. This is in contrast to tetanically stimulated seizure-like afterdischarges that show an apparent EI synchronization (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004
; Perez-Velazquez and Carlen 1999
). We are aware of no other observations of such EI interactions during spontaneous SLEs.
In our work we explicitly calculated the correlation between distinct neuronal subtypes. We found that correlations during SLEs depended qualitatively on whether subthreshold or spike information was considered. During the SLE onset, we observed a decrease in the subthreshold input correlation among EE pairs. This finding is consistent with our previous work in which we pharmacologically suppressed active conductances (Netoff et al. 2002
). EE spike output correlation, on the other hand, increased during SLEs. Similar increases in spike correlation were observed in vivo between nearby putative neocortical pyramidal cells (Timofeev et al. 2004
).
It remains to be explained how hippocampal pyramidal cells, with sparse associational connections, exhibit prominent spike synchronization in the setting of decreased subthreshold correlations. It is possible that such spikes synchronize through their ephaptic electric fields (Traub 1985a
,b
) or through gap junction connectivity between the axons of pyramidal cells (Draguhn et al. 1998
). These effects are likely to be more effective when interneurons coordinate their DB activity by their own gap junctions (Zhang et al. 2004
), thus concurrently releasing the pyramidal cells from inhibition. Indeed, our preliminary evidence suggests that the gap junction blocker carbenoxolone in our preparation blocks SLEs and, at low concentrations, shortens DB in interneurons (see Supplementary Fig. 2).
In contrast to EE, EI correlation was elevated at the beginning and end of SLEs. These findings are consistent with the fact that EI spike synchrony can occur only when both populations of cells are firingat the beginning and toward the end of inhibitory DB. The loss of inhibitory spikes during DB is coincident with the simultaneous decrease in pyramidal cell subthreshold EE synchronization. Finally, subthreshold II correlation increased while the interneurons in DB stopped firing and pyramidal cell spike correlation increased. We suggest that correlated EE spiking during interneuron DB delivers synchronous synaptic currents to interneurons at a time during which they are unable to respond by spiking.
Nonetheless, we are cautious in evaluating data after spike extraction. The residual subthreshold time series likely undersampled synaptic currents that are coincident with spike generation, potentially leading to a spurious decrease in subthreshold EE correlation. However, our results are consistent with earlier findings during active conductance blockade (Netoff et al. 2002
). It may be possible that overestimation of correlation resulting from the presence of active membrane conductances and underestimation through time series undersampling after spike extraction may have partially offset each other.
Although synchrony has often been implicated in seizure generation (Westbrook 1991
), we are cautious in our interpretation of the observed correlation patterns in our experiments. Despite consistent patterns of correlation changes in the SLEs, we cannot infer a causal role for synchrony in orchestrating the neuronal interplay observed. Furthermore, it remains unknown what synchronization and neuronal interplay patterns will be observed in other in vitro and endogenous in vivo seizures when similarly examined.
Previous work has shown that after stimulation, chloride loading inside pyramidal cells causes inhibition to become excitatory (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004
, 2005
). It is possible that excessive inhibitory activity at the start of our SLEs became excitatory in its effects on pyramidal cells. Preliminary voltage-clamp observations (Ziburkus et al. 2005
) suggest that not only pyramidal cells but interneurons as well may have elevated intracellular chloride in this model.
Most of our recorded interneurons resembled O-LM cells in their membrane properties (Fig. 2A) and horizontally oriented dendritic projections (Fig. 2B). O-LM cells also constitute the overwhelming majority of the oriens interneurons (Freund and Buzsáki 1996
; Somogyi and Klausberger 2005
). Nevertheless, we recognize that we likely included interneurons other than O-LM cells in our sampling.
Although seizures have traditionally been treated as monolithic entitiesictal versus nonictalthere is little to support this notion. Our findings suggest that the interplay of cellular activity supports a natural partitioning of these in vitro SLEs into stages. The motif of excessive inhibition, subsequent inhibitory breakdown through DB, and the concurrent increase in excitatory output could underlie some of the structured patterns seen in EEGs during seizures. In recent work, discrimination of human scalp and intracranially recorded seizures into at least three dynamical stages was shown (Schiff et al. 2005
). The experimental findings in this present report illustrate a set of cellular interactions that underlie the evolution of stages in these in vitro SLEs. It will remain a challenge to identify the relevant cellular mechanisms that underlie the evolution of endogenous seizure stages in vivo. Finally, if inhibitory and excitatory cell types fire at different times during seizures, then our findings suggest several novel therapeutic targets for seizure control, including blocking excessive inhibitory network activity and preventing depolarization block.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 The Supplementary Material for this article (2 figures and additional text) is available online at http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/01378.2005/DC1. ![]()
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. J. Schiff, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State Univeristy, 212 Earth-Engineering Sciences Bldg., University Park, PA 16802 (E-mail: sschiff{at}psu.edu)
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Avoli M, Barbarosie M, Lucke A, Nagao T, Lopantsev V, and Kohling R. Synchronous GABA-mediated potentials and epileptiform discharges in the rat limbic system. Neuroscience 16: 39123924, 1996a.
Avoli M, Louvel J, Kurcewicz I, Pumain R, and Barbarosie M. Extracellular free potassium and calcium during synchronous activity induced by 4-aminopyridine in the juvenile rat hippocampus. J Physiol 493: 707717, 1996b.[ISI]
Avoli M, Perreault P, Olivier A, and Villemure JG. 4-Aminopyridine induces a long-lasting depolarizing GABA-ergic potential in human neocortical and hippocampal neurons maintained. Neurosci Lett 94: 327332, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Babb TL, Pretorius JK, Kupfer WR, and Crandall PH. Glutamate decarboxylase immunoreactive neurons are preserved in human epileptic hippocampus. Neuroscience 7: 25622574, 1989.
Barbarosie M and Avoli M. CA3-driven hippocampal-entorhinal loop controls rather than sustains limbic seizures. Neuroscience 17: 93089314, 1997.
Bikson M, Hahn PJ, Fox JE, and Jefferys JG. Depolarization block of neurons during maintenance of electrographic seizures. J Neurophysiol 90: 24022408, 2003.
Bragin A, Penttonen M, and Buzsáki G. Termination of epileptic afterdischarge in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 17: 25672579, 1997.
Buonomano DV. Timing of neural responses in cortical organotypic slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 48974902, 2003.
Cohen I, Navarro V, Clemenceau S, Baulac M, and Miles R. On the origin of interictal activity in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Science 298: 14181421, 2002.
Draguhn A, Traub RD, Schmitz D, and Jefferys JGR. Electrical coupling underlies high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Nature 394: 189192, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
During M and Spencer DD. Extracellular hippocampal glutamate and spontaneous seizure in the conscious human brain. Lancet 341: 16071610, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Freund TF and Buzsáki G. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 6: 347470, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Fujiwara-Tsukamoto Y, Isomura Y, Kaneda K, and Takada M. Synaptic interactions between pyramidal cells and interneurone subtypes during seizure-like activity in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 557: 961979, 2004.
Fujiwara-Tsukamoto Y, Isomura Y, and Takada M. Comparable GABAergic mechanisms of hippocampal seizure-like activity in post-tetanic and low-Mg2+ conditions. J Neurophysiol 2005 Dec 7; [Epub ahead of print].
Gillies MJ, Traub RD, LeBeau FE, Davies CH, Gloveli T, Buhl EH, and Whittington MA. A model of atropine-resistant theta oscillations in rat hippocampal area CA1. J Physiol 543: 779793, 2002.
Higashima M, Kinoshita H, Yamaguchi N, and Koshino Y. Activation of GABAergic function necessary for afterdischarge generation in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett 207: 101104, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Isaev D, Isaeva E, Khazipov R, and Holmes GL. Anticonvulsant action of GABA in the high potassium-low magnesium model of ictogenesis in the neonatal rat hippocampus in vivo and in vitro. J Neurophysiol 94: 29872992, 2005.
Kandel ER and Spencer WA. Excitation and inhibition of single pyramidal cells during hippocampal seizure. Exp Neurol 4: 162179, 1961.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Khosravani H, Carlen PL, and Perez Velazquez JL. The control of seizure-like activity in the rat hippocampal slice. Biophys J 84: 687695, 2003.
Khosravani H, Pinnegar CR, Mitchell JR, Bardakjian BL, Federico P, and Carlen PL. Increased high-frequency oscillations precede in vitro low-Mg seizures. Epilepsia 46: 11881197, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Klausberger T, Magill PJ, Marton LF, Roberts JDB, Cobden PM, Buzsáki G, and Somogyi P. Brain-state- and cell-type-specific firing of hippocampal interneurons in vivo. Nature 421: 844848, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lopantsev V and Avoli M. Participation of GABAa-mediated inhibition in ictal-like discharges in the rat entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol 79: 352360, 1998.
Maccaferri G and Lacaille JC. Interneuron diversity series: hippocampal interneuron classificationsmaking things as simple as possible, not simpler. Trends Neurosci 26: 564571, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Maccaferri G and McBain CJ. The hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) and its contribution to pacemaker activity in rat CA1 hippocampal stratum oriens-alveus interneurones. J Physiol 497: 119130, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
Matsumoto H and Marsan CA. Cortical cellular phenomena in experimental epilepsy: ictal manifestation. Exp Neurol 25: 305326, 1964.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Menendez de la Prida L, Benavides-Piccione R, Sola R, and Pozo MA. Electrophysiological properties of interneurons from intraoperative spiking areas of epileptic human temporal neocortex. Neuroreport 13: 14211425, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Mooney R, Hoese W, and Nowicki S. Auditory representation of the vocal repertoire in a songbird with multiple song types. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1277812783, 2001.
Netoff TI and Schiff SJ. Decreased neuronal synchronization during experimental seizures. Neuroscience 22: 72977307, 2002.
Oliva AA Jr, Lam TT, and Swann JW. Distally directed dendrotoxicity induced by kainic acid in hippocampal interneurons of green fluorescent protein-expressing transgenic mice. Neuroscience 22: 80528062, 2002.
Penfield W and Jasper H. Epilepsy and the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1954.
Perez-Velazquez JL. Bicarbonate-dependent depolarizing potentials in pyramidal cells and interneurons during epileptiform activity. Eur J Neurosci 18: 13371342, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Perez-Velazquez JL and Carlen PL. Synchronization of GABAergic interneuronal networks during seizure-like activity in the rat horizontal hippocampal slice. Eur J Neurosci 11: 41104118, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Pike FG, Goddard RS, Suckling JM, Ganter P, Kasthuri N, and Paulsen O. Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurones in response to oscillatory input currents. J Physiol 529: 205213, 2000.
Sanon N, Carmant L, Emond M, Congar P, and Lacaille JC. Short-term effects of kainic acid on CA1 hippocampal interneurons differentially vulnerable to excitotoxicity. Epilepsia 46: 837848, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Santhakumar V and Soltesz I. Plasticity of interneuronal species diversity and parameter variance in neurological diseases. Trends Neurosci 27: 504510, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Schiff SJ, Sauer T, Kumar R, and Weinstein SL. Neuronal spatiotemporal pattern discrimination: the dynamical evolution of seizures. Neuroimage 28: 10431055, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Somjen GG. Ions in the Brain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.
Somogyi P and Klausberger T. Defined types of cortical interneurone structure, space and spike timing in the hippocampus. J Physiol 562: 926, 2005.
Timofeev I, Grenier F, and Steriade M. The role of chloride-dependent inhibition and the activity of fast-spiking neurons during cortical spike-wave electrographic seizures. J Neurosci Methods 114: 11151132, 2002.
Timofeev I, Grenier F, and Steriade M. Contribution of intrinsic neuronal factors in the generation of cortically driven electrographic seizures. J Neurophysiol 92: 11331143, 2004.
Traub RD, Dudek FE, Snow RW, and Knowles WD. Computer simulations indicate that electrical field effects contribute to the shape of the epileptiform field potential. Neuroscience 15: 947958, 1985b.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Traub RD, Dudek FE, Taylor CP, and Knowles WD. Simulation of hippocampal afterdischarges synchronized by electrical interactions. Neuroscience 14: 10331038, 1985a.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Westbrook GL. Seizures and epilepsy. In: Principles of Neural Science, edited by Kandel ER, Jessell TM, and Schwartz JH. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
Wyler AR, Ojemann GA, and Ward AA. Neurons in human epileptic cortex: correlation between unit and EEG activity. Ann Neurol 11: 301308, 1982.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Zhang X-L, Zhang L, and Carlen PL. Electrotonic coupling between stratum oriens interneurones in the intact mouse juvenile hippocampus. J Physiol 558: 825839, 2004.
Ziburkus J, Cressman JR, Johnson KE, and Schiff SJ. Inhibitory and excitatory interplay: neuronal conductance measures during in vitro seizures. Epilepsia 46, Suppl. 8: 271272, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. J. Voss, J. W. Sleigh, J. P. M. Barnard, and H. E. Kirsch The Howling Cortex: Seizures and General Anesthetic Drugs Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1689 - 1703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Derchansky, S. S. Jahromi, M. Mamani, D. S. Shin, A. Sik, and P. L. Carlen Transition to seizures in the isolated immature mouse hippocampus: a switch from dominant phasic inhibition to dominant phasic excitation J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 477 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Spampanato and I. Mody Spike Timing of Lacunosom-Moleculare Targeting Interneurons and CA3 Pyramidal Cells During High-Frequency Network Oscillations In Vitro J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 96 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Trevelyan, D. Sussillo, B. O. Watson, and R. Yuste Modular Propagation of Epileptiform Activity: Evidence for an Inhibitory Veto in Neocortex J. Neurosci., November 29, 2006; 26(48): 12447 - 12455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |