JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 95: 3948-3954, 2006. First published March 22, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.01378.2005
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3948    most recent
01378.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziburkus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziburkus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. J.

REPORT

Interneuron and Pyramidal Cell Interplay During In Vitro Seizure-Like Events

Jokubas Ziburkus1, John R. Cressman1, Ernest Barreto1,2,3 and Steven J. Schiff1,3,4

1Center for Neural Dynamics, Krasnow Institute, 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, 3Program in Neuroscience, and 4Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Submitted 28 December 2005; accepted in final form 10 March 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Excitatory and inhibitory (EI) interactions shape network activity. However, little is known about the EI interactions in pathological conditions such as epilepsy. To investigate EI interactions during seizure-like events (SLEs), we performed simultaneous dual and triple whole cell and extracellular recordings in pyramidal cells and oriens interneurons in rat hippocampal CA1. We describe a novel pattern of interleaving EI activity during spontaneous in vitro SLEs generated by the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine in the presence of decreased magnesium. Interneuron activity was increased during interictal periods. During ictal discharges interneurons entered into long-lasting depolarization block (DB) with suppression of spike generation; simultaneously, pyramidal cells produced spike trains with increased frequency (6–14 Hz) and correlation. After this period of runaway excitation, interneuron postictal spiking resumed and pyramidal cells became progressively quiescent. We performed correlation measures of cell-pair interactions using either the spikes alone or the subthreshold postsynaptic interspike signals. EE spike correlation was notably increased during interneuron DB, whereas subthreshold EE correlation decreased. EI spike correlations increased at the end of SLEs, whereas II subthreshold correlations increased during DB. Our findings underscore the importance of complex cell-type–specific neuronal interactions in the formation of seizure patterns.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Epileptic seizures are often described as "hypersynchronous" events arising from decreased inhibition with excessive excitation (Penfield and Jasper 1954Go; Westbrook 1991Go; Wyler and Ojemann 1982Go). However, inhibition is retained in samples from human epileptics (Babb et al. 1989Go; During and Spencer 1993Go; Menendez de la Prida et al. 2002Go) and interneuron activity is essential for the generation of in vitro epileptiform activity in human (Cohen et al. 2002Go) and animal (Avoli et al. 1996aGo; Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004Go; Higashima et al. 1996Go; Lopantsev and Avoli 1998Go; Perez-Velazquez and Carlen 1999) tissue. Additionally, EEG (Schiff et al. 2005Go) and in vitro synaptic currents (Netoff and Schiff 2002Go) suggest that seizures may not be characterized by a straightforward synchrony increase.

Previous in vitro studies of intracellular excitatory–inhibitory (EI) interplay focused primarily on stimulation-induced epileptiform activity (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004Go, 2005Go; Perez-Velazquez 2003Go; Perez-Velazquez and Carlen 1999Go). In these paradigms, tetanic stimulation replaced preictal and ictal onset dynamics and the resulting afterdischarges demonstrated synchronous activation of inhibitory and excitatory cells (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004Go). However, we know little about EI interactions and synchrony during spontaneous preictal, ictal, and postictal events.

To investigate EI, excitatory–excitatory (EE), and inhibitory–inhibitory (II) interactions in robust seizure-like events (SLEs), we used a 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and decreased magnesium seizure model. Simultaneous dual and triple whole cell recordings of inhibitory oriens interneurons and excitatory pyramidal cells, along with extracellular potential measurements, were performed in the CA1 of rat hippocampal slices. We report a novel pattern of EI activity interplay during these spontaneous SLEs.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Experiments were performed on Sprague–Dawley rats (P18–P35) with a George Mason University approved protocol.

Electrophysiology

Animals were anesthetized with diethyl-ether and decapitated, brains were removed, hippocampi isolated, and transverse 350 µm sections cut in cold dissection buffer (in mM: 2.6 KCl, 1.23 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 0.1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 205 sucrose, 20 glucose) using a vibratome.

Slices were incubated for 1 h in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF; pH 7.3, 30°C, in mM: 130 NaCl, 0.6 MgSO4, 3.5 KCl, 1.2 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 2.5 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3) aerated with 95% O2-5% CO2, transferred to a submersion recording chamber (Warner Instruments), and perfused (1 ml/min, 34°C). Borosilicate glass micropipettes (4–7 M{Omega}) for current-clamp recordings contained (in mM): 116 K gluconate, 6 KCl, 0.5 EGTA, 20 HEPES, 10 phosphocreatine, 0.3 NaGTP, 2 NaCl, 4 MgATP, and 0.3% Neurobiotin (pH 7.25, 295 mOsm). Extracellular recordings were performed with micropipettes (1–3 M{Omega}, 0.9% NaCl).

Alignment of the seizure start times was based on an identifiable feature of the extracellular recording—the fast positive extracellular shift (FPES, 1–5 mV, Fig. 1D). Oriens interneurons (see Supplementary Materials)1 were targeted because of their importance and vulnerability in epilepsy (Oliva et al. 2002Go; Sanon et al. 2005Go; Santhakumar and Soltesz 2004Go) and their role in network synchronization (Gillies et al. 2002Go; Pike et al. 2000Go). Seven of 12 interneurons that underwent depolarization block (DB) displayed oriens-lacunosum moleculare (O-LM) interneuron membrane characteristics and bipolar horizontal dendritic morphology (Maccaferri and Lacaille 2003Go; Maccaferri and McBain 1996Go; see Supplementary materials). Cells selected for patching were 30–200 µm apart (average 122 µm). An extracellular electrode was placed in the pyramidale near the patched cells. A subset of experiments was performed after isolating CA1 (n = 13) by making cuts from alveus to moleculare lacunosum on each side of CA1. Recordings were performed using Axoclamp 2B and 2A, MCC 700 (Molecular Devices), and Grass P16 amplifiers, filtered (5 kHz whole cell, 1 kHz extracellular) and digitized at 10 kHz (Digidata and Pclamp7, Molecular Devices).


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Analysis of the seizure-like events (SLEs) in pyramidal cell pairs. A, left trace: complete voltage signal recorded from a pyramidal cell during SLE. Right trace: expanded excerpt from the left. B: examples of the same signal as in A with the spikes removed (regions in gray boxes). Residual interspike voltage signal was used for subthreshold correlation analysis. C: photomicrograph of 2 neurobiotin-filled pyramidal cells in the CA1. s., stratum; l.m., lacunosum moleculare; r., radiatum; p., pyramidale; o., oriens. D: whole cell recordings from 2 pyramidal cells (triangles) and an extracellular electrode (EC). After some preictal spikes, pyramidal cells fire a prolonged burst of spikes riding on a wave of intracellular depolarization (ictal event), followed by postictal spikes of decaying frequency. Inverted triangle (30 s, D and E) is aligned with the fast positive extracellular shifts (FPESs) used to denote the start of the ictal events. E and F: crosscorrelation between each pair was measured within 1-s nonoverlapping windows beginning 30 s before until 70 s after the FPES. Graphs of crosscorrelation values for spikes (E) and subthreshold voltages (F). Black diamonds represent unweighted pooled and gray squares weighted resampled averages. ANOVA results for 1-s windows showed that crosscorrelation values for subthreshold voltages (df = 7,199, F = 1.38, P = 0.0083 for unweighted) and for the spikes (df = 7,199, F = 14.72, P < 0.0001) significantly changed across the evolution of SLEs. Tukey multiple-comparison tests (P < 0.001 for unweighted and P < 0.05 for weighted averages) confirmed that correlation values at the start of the ictal event ({blacktriangledown}) significantly decreased for the subthreshold voltages and increased for the spikes.

 
SLEs appeared after 100 µM bath application of 4-AP (Sigma) and raising the temperature to 36°C. Increasing concentrations of 4-AP were used (≤200 µM) if SLE formation was not observed within 20 min. We fortuitously discovered that decreasing the Mg concentration to 0.6 mM, although insufficient by itself to promote SLEs, had a profound affect on prolonging 4-AP–induced SLEs. 4-AP increases inhibitory and excitatory signaling (Avoli et al. 1988Go, 1996bGo; Somjen 2004Go), whereas decreased Mg partially removes N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade and divalent charge screening. A similar strategy uses elevated potassium with decreased magnesium (Isaev et al. 2005Go; Khosravani et al. 2003Go, 2005Go).

Histochemistry

Neurobiotin-filled cells were reconstructed with camera lucida (Fig. 2A and Supplementary material). For the cells that exhibited DB, outlines of the slices and stratum pyramidale were drawn using camera lucida and overlaid (to the best fit) in Adobe Photoshop (Fig. 2E).


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Excitatory–inhibitory (EI) interplay during SLEs. A: examples of pyramidal (triangle) and oriens interneuron (ellipse) membrane properties after 500 ms (scale bar) negative and positive current injections. B: camera lucida microscope drawings of the dendrites of the cells in A. s., stratum; o., oriens; p., pyramidale; r., radiatum. Scale bar: 50 µm. C: repetitive SLEs and EI interplay. Interneuron (ellipse) is more active in 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) than the pyramidal (triangle) cell. EC denotes a fortuitous extracellular single unit recording of action potentials from the axon of this interneuron. EC electrode was placed in oriens, about 75 µm from the interneuron soma. D: expanded time base illustrating robust EI interplay during the SLEs. Note the cessation of axonal spikes in EC during interneuron depolarization block (DB). E: locations of interneurons exhibiting DB. Horizontal and rounded interneuron somata were mapped following neurobiotin histochemistry. Gray stars indicate interneurons that underwent DB in isolated CA1.

 
Correlation analysis

To track the temporal evolution of EE and EI synchrony, two unbiased crosscorrelations were calculated using subthreshold membrane potentials and spike times of pairs of neurons over discrete time windows. We use crosscorrelation to infer the presence of synchronization (Netoff and Schiff 2002Go). Dual-correlation analyses allowed us to compare synchrony in subthreshold inputs and suprathreshold neuronal outputs. Alternate methods to achieve a similar analysis used median filters to remove spikes (Buonomano 2003Go; Mooney et al. 2001Go), which alter the spectra and are less suitable for correlation measures.

For spike correlation, a simple threshold was used to identify discrete spike times. To measure subthreshold correlations, data between spike initiation and termination were discarded and correlations were performed using interspike data (Fig. 1, A and B). The spike data gaps were retained, leaving the time relationships among the residual subthreshold voltages unchanged. This subthreshold activity reflects not only synaptic network inputs to the cells but also intrinsic voltage-gated subthreshold responses. In contrast, spike crosscorrelation reflects neuronal output (see Supplementary material). We applied an estimate of the expected crosscorrelation variance given each time series' autocorrelation and time length. Only statistically significant correlations, greater than 2 SDs of the expected value, were included in the analysis (full details in Supplementary materials).

Statistical analysis

Averaged data representing spiking rates and crosscorrelation values are reported as mean ± SD. ANOVA was used to determine whether the means of correlation measures from distinct SLE epochs were significantly different. Post hoc Tukey multiple-comparison tests (confidence limit P < 0.001) were performed after ANOVA. Because the number of SLEs measured per cell pair was variable (5–18), we also recalculated averages by randomly resampling to equalize the number of SLEs compared from each pair. Both pooled and resampled averages are reported.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Recurrent SLEs (>15 s ictal-like network events with extracellular potential shifts; Fig. 1, A and D) were recorded in 30 neuronal pairs (18 dual and four triple) located in strata oriens and pyramidale, yielding over 250 SLEs for analysis. Qualitatively analogous SLEs were observed in experiments in which the CA1 region was surgically isolated (n = 13 cells), suggesting that the excitatory Schaeffer collateral pathway is not necessary for local network SLE generation in the CA1 (Barbarosie and Avoli 1997Go; Netoff and Schiff 2002Go).

Pyramidal cells (n = 35) fired at lower rates than interneurons before SLEs. Consistent early features of SLEs were a burst of pyramidal cell spikes (about 1–3 s), coinciding with the FPES in the extracellular and intracellular potentials followed by a sustained negative extracellular shift (1–5 mV, Fig. 1D). When multiple FPESs were seen, the final one just before the slow negative extracellular potential shift was selected as the temporal anchor point for subsequent analysis.

Sub- and suprathreshold crosscorrelation analyses of excitatory cell pairs (n = 15) revealed qualitatively different results (Fig. 1, E and F). Pyramidal cell spike output increased considerably during the SLEs (n = 15 pairs, 148 SLEs) and showed a substantial increase in spike crosscorrelation (Fig. 1E). In contrast, averaged subthreshold EE correlations (n = 15 pairs; 148 SLEs) showed significantly decreased correlations at the start of the ictal-like event (Fig. 1F). This finding is consistent with previous results in which voltage-activated conductances during similar recordings were blocked (Netoff and Schiff 2002Go).

In the presence of 4-AP, oriens interneurons were more active and fired at higher frequencies than concurrently recorded pyramidal cells (Figs. 2 and 3). During SLEs, the interneurons and pyramidal cells exhibited a robust spiking interplay (Fig. 2), which took place over substantially longer timescales compared with the interplay seen in interictal bursts (see Supplementary Fig. 1).


Figure 3
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. EI interplay during SLEs. A: traces from simultaneous whole cell measurements from one interneuron (blue, ellipse) and 2 pyramidal cells (red, triangles), and an extracellular DC mode recording (EC). Inverted black triangles denote the FPESs. B: average spike rates of the 3 cells (interneuron: blue circles; pyramidal 1: red diamonds; pyramidal 2: red triangles). Note that the plot in B is an average (n = 8 SLEs in the experiment), and thus is not precisely time locked to the single SLE example shown in A. C: EI cross-correlation averages. Means of EI subthreshold crosscorrelation values were significantly different (ANOVA: df = 10199, F = 4.27, P < 0.0001) at distinct SLE stages (Tukey multicomparison, green asterisks). Unweighted pooled subthreshold EI crosscorrelation values (represented as black diamonds) peaked at the onset of SLEs, followed by a decrease, and then a gradual increase toward the end of the SLEs (Tukey multiple-comparison test, P < 0.001). With weighted resampled averages (gray squares) the peak at the onset of SLEs was less prominent, but the significance of the increase in subthreshold EI correlations was retained (P < 0.05). Inverted black triangles denote the FPESs in C, D, and inset in E. D: a significant increase in EI spike correlations was observed at the beginning (unweighted, blue asterisk) and after the DB in interneurons (weighted averages, green asterisk). [ANOVA, df = 10199, F = 3.27, P < 0.0001; Tukey multiple-comparison test, P < 0.001 for unweighted (black diamonds) and P < 0.005 for weighted resampled (gray squares) averages.] E: cumulative average spike rates (n = 15 oriens interneurons and n = 40 pyramidal cells from pairs and single whole cell recordings). Note the peak of inhibitory spiking preceding the FPES (dark blue: I, unweighted pooled; light blue: I, weighted resampled). Excitatory firing rates increase as interneurons enter into the DB and decreased as interneurons exit the DB (red: E unweighted pooled; orange: unweighted pooled). Inset: average spike rates at expanded timescale.

 
Interneuron firing rates peaked at 62 Hz just before entering into the long-lasting (5–40 s) DB within the ictal discharge. DB was characterized by transmembrane potential depolarization (to –40 to –10 mV) and the inactivation of action potential–generating mechanisms (Bikson et al. 2003Go; Bragin et al. 1997Go; Somjen 2004Go). DB was observed in 12 horizontal interneurons located in stratum oriens and the pyramidale–oriens layer border (Fig. 2E). Depolarization block was rarely pronounced in pyramidal cells and, when observed, was significantly shorter (<2 s) than in interneurons (Fig. 2D). As seen in Figs. 2 and 3, pyramidal cells produced sustained barages of spikes during interneuron DB, typically firing 6–15 spikes/s (average 8.28 spikes for the first 5 s of the ictal event). Note the fortuitous extracellular single-unit recording from the axon of the interneuron in Fig. 2, C and D, confirming cessation of inhibitory spiking during DB. SLE termination was accompanied by the return of interneuron activity as pyramidal cells became progressively quiescent.

Figure 3 shows an example of simultaneous EE and EI interactions during a triple whole cell and extracellular recording of a spontaneous SLE and the respective average (n = 8 SLEs) firing rates. This example illustrates that the firing rates of the two recorded pyramidal cells changed together, with peak firing rates at the onset and sustained high firing rates during the interneuron DB.

Analysis of 102 SLEs from EI pairs is shown in Fig. 3, CE (n = 12 pairs). There was an increase in EI subthreshold correlations at the beginning and toward the end of the interneuron DB. With resampling, the increase in subthreshold correlations toward the end of the SLEs was the most robust feature (Fig. 3C).

A significant increase in EI spike correlations was observed at the beginning (unweighted) and toward the end of the SLEs (weighted averages; about 45 s, Fig. 3D). These EI subthreshold and spike findings are consistent with the fact that pyramidal cells and interneurons were active together at the onset and offset of the depolarization block.

The spike rate averages (n = 12 pairs, 102 SLEs) in Fig. 3E show a consistent robust sequence, starting with intense interneuron firing, followed by a peak in pyramidal cell firing during interneuron DB, and concluding with the return of intense inhibitory firing as pyramidal activity decays. The terminal decay in pyramidal cell firing frequency is associated with the second peak and sustained firing in interneurons recovering from the block (about 35 s, Fig. 3E and inset).

Figure 4 shows an example of two interneurons participating in a SLE. Although spiking activity ceased as both interneurons entered DB, subthreshold correlation values nevertheless increased (n = 13 SLEs, three pairs). The finding that pyramidal cell spike correlations are increased during interneuron DB (Fig. 3C) is consistent with synchronous excitation contributing to the subthreshold II correlations during their DB. In contrast, the loss of inhibitory spike outputs is consistent with the decrease in EE subthreshold correlations during DB (Fig. 1F).


Figure 4
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Inhibitory–inhibitory (II) activity during SLEs. A: whole cell measurements from 2 oriens interneurons accompanied by the average cross-correlation (CC) measures of suprathreshold (B) and subthreshold (C) signals (n = 13 SLEs, 3 pairs). Inverted triangle indicates the FPES. Note the clear loss of spiking and increase in subthreshold correlations during DB in II pairs (unweighted averages).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Our fundamental finding is the novel interleaved spiking pattern between pyramidal cells and interneurons during spontaneous in vitro hippocampal seizure-like events. Our analysis of spike output between EI pairs revealed that pyramidal cells and interneurons became activated at different times during SLEs. Oriens interneurons were more active at SLE onset, followed by a period of DB during which pyramidal cells exhibited runaway excitation. SLE termination was characterized by the oriens interneurons emerging from DB into progressively more active spiking and the simultaneous gradual reduction of pyramidal cell spiking.

Neuronal interplay and depolarization block may have been first observed in pioneering in vivo studies of single intracellular neocortical and hippocampal seizure recordings from untyped cells (Kandel and Spencer 1961Go; Matsumoto and Marsan 1964). More recently, a strong inhibitory component of seizures with increased inhibitory spiking before and after paroxysmal discharges was observed in single intracellular in vivo recordings from fast-spiking putative interneurons (Timofeev et al. 2002Go). Additional recent in vivo observations have clearly shown that precisely interleaved activity of subpopulations of inhibitory cells coordinate normal hippocampal theta rhythms and sharp waves (Klausberger et al. 2003Go).

Examples of in vitro EI interplay have been observed in spontaneous bursts with elevated K+ (Aradi and Maccaferri 2004Go). We have also observed similar activity in our preparation (see Supplementary Fig. 1) and have observed that the spontaneous SLEs in our solution retained features of the burst EI interplay, but at the much longer timescale of seizures. This is in contrast to tetanically stimulated seizure-like afterdischarges that show an apparent EI synchronization (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004Go; Perez-Velazquez and Carlen 1999Go). We are aware of no other observations of such EI interactions during spontaneous SLEs.

In our work we explicitly calculated the correlation between distinct neuronal subtypes. We found that correlations during SLEs depended qualitatively on whether subthreshold or spike information was considered. During the SLE onset, we observed a decrease in the subthreshold input correlation among EE pairs. This finding is consistent with our previous work in which we pharmacologically suppressed active conductances (Netoff et al. 2002Go). EE spike output correlation, on the other hand, increased during SLEs. Similar increases in spike correlation were observed in vivo between nearby putative neocortical pyramidal cells (Timofeev et al. 2004Go).

It remains to be explained how hippocampal pyramidal cells, with sparse associational connections, exhibit prominent spike synchronization in the setting of decreased subthreshold correlations. It is possible that such spikes synchronize through their ephaptic electric fields (Traub 1985aGo,bGo) or through gap junction connectivity between the axons of pyramidal cells (Draguhn et al. 1998Go). These effects are likely to be more effective when interneurons coordinate their DB activity by their own gap junctions (Zhang et al. 2004Go), thus concurrently releasing the pyramidal cells from inhibition. Indeed, our preliminary evidence suggests that the gap junction blocker carbenoxolone in our preparation blocks SLEs and, at low concentrations, shortens DB in interneurons (see Supplementary Fig. 2).

In contrast to EE, EI correlation was elevated at the beginning and end of SLEs. These findings are consistent with the fact that EI spike synchrony can occur only when both populations of cells are firing—at the beginning and toward the end of inhibitory DB. The loss of inhibitory spikes during DB is coincident with the simultaneous decrease in pyramidal cell subthreshold EE synchronization. Finally, subthreshold II correlation increased while the interneurons in DB stopped firing and pyramidal cell spike correlation increased. We suggest that correlated EE spiking during interneuron DB delivers synchronous synaptic currents to interneurons at a time during which they are unable to respond by spiking.

Nonetheless, we are cautious in evaluating data after spike extraction. The residual subthreshold time series likely undersampled synaptic currents that are coincident with spike generation, potentially leading to a spurious decrease in subthreshold EE correlation. However, our results are consistent with earlier findings during active conductance blockade (Netoff et al. 2002Go). It may be possible that overestimation of correlation resulting from the presence of active membrane conductances and underestimation through time series undersampling after spike extraction may have partially offset each other.

Although synchrony has often been implicated in seizure generation (Westbrook 1991Go), we are cautious in our interpretation of the observed correlation patterns in our experiments. Despite consistent patterns of correlation changes in the SLEs, we cannot infer a causal role for synchrony in orchestrating the neuronal interplay observed. Furthermore, it remains unknown what synchronization and neuronal interplay patterns will be observed in other in vitro and endogenous in vivo seizures when similarly examined.

Previous work has shown that after stimulation, chloride loading inside pyramidal cells causes inhibition to become excitatory (Fujiwara-Tsukamoto et al. 2004Go, 2005Go). It is possible that excessive inhibitory activity at the start of our SLEs became excitatory in its effects on pyramidal cells. Preliminary voltage-clamp observations (Ziburkus et al. 2005Go) suggest that not only pyramidal cells but interneurons as well may have elevated intracellular chloride in this model.

Most of our recorded interneurons resembled O-LM cells in their membrane properties (Fig. 2A) and horizontally oriented dendritic projections (Fig. 2B). O-LM cells also constitute the overwhelming majority of the oriens interneurons (Freund and Buzsáki 1996Go; Somogyi and Klausberger 2005Go). Nevertheless, we recognize that we likely included interneurons other than O-LM cells in our sampling.

Although seizures have traditionally been treated as monolithic entities—ictal versus nonictal—there is little to support this notion. Our findings suggest that the interplay of cellular activity supports a natural partitioning of these in vitro SLEs into stages. The motif of excessive inhibition, subsequent inhibitory breakdown through DB, and the concurrent increase in excitatory output could underlie some of the structured patterns seen in EEGs during seizures. In recent work, discrimination of human scalp and intracranially recorded seizures into at least three dynamical stages was shown (Schiff et al. 2005Go). The experimental findings in this present report illustrate a set of cellular interactions that underlie the evolution of stages in these in vitro SLEs. It will remain a challenge to identify the relevant cellular mechanisms that underlie the evolution of endogenous seizure stages in vivo. Finally, if inhibitory and excitatory cell types fire at different times during seizures, then our findings suggest several novel therapeutic targets for seizure control, including blocking excessive inhibitory network activity and preventing depolarization block.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01-MH-50006 and K02-MH-01493 to S. J. Schiff and K25-MH-01963 to E. Barreto, and a grant from the Epilepsy Foundation to J. Ziburkus.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We are grateful to G. Buzsáki, R. Traub, T. Netoff, and S. L. Weinstein for helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 The Supplementary Material for this article (2 figures and additional text) is available online at http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/01378.2005/DC1. Back

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. J. Schiff, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State Univeristy, 212 Earth-Engineering Sciences Bldg., University Park, PA 16802 (E-mail: sschiff{at}psu.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Aradi I and Maccaferri G. Cell type-specific synaptic dynamics of synchronized bursting in the juvenile CA3 rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 24: 9681–9692, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Avoli M, Barbarosie M, Lucke A, Nagao T, Lopantsev V, and Kohling R. Synchronous GABA-mediated potentials and epileptiform discharges in the rat limbic system. Neuroscience 16: 3912–3924, 1996a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Avoli M, Louvel J, Kurcewicz I, Pumain R, and Barbarosie M. Extracellular free potassium and calcium during synchronous activity induced by 4-aminopyridine in the juvenile rat hippocampus. J Physiol 493: 707–717, 1996b.[ISI]

Avoli M, Perreault P, Olivier A, and Villemure JG. 4-Aminopyridine induces a long-lasting depolarizing GABA-ergic potential in human neocortical and hippocampal neurons maintained. Neurosci Lett 94: 327–332, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Babb TL, Pretorius JK, Kupfer WR, and Crandall PH. Glutamate decarboxylase immunoreactive neurons are preserved in human epileptic hippocampus. Neuroscience 7: 2562–2574, 1989.

Barbarosie M and Avoli M. CA3-driven hippocampal-entorhinal loop controls rather than sustains limbic seizures. Neuroscience 17: 9308–9314, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bikson M, Hahn PJ, Fox JE, and Jefferys JG. Depolarization block of neurons during maintenance of electrographic seizures. J Neurophysiol 90: 2402–2408, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bragin A, Penttonen M, and Buzsáki G. Termination of epileptic afterdischarge in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 17: 2567–2579, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Buonomano DV. Timing of neural responses in cortical organotypic slices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 4897–4902, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cohen I, Navarro V, Clemenceau S, Baulac M, and Miles R. On the origin of interictal activity in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Science 298: 1418–1421, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Draguhn A, Traub RD, Schmitz D, and Jefferys JGR. Electrical coupling underlies high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Nature 394: 189–192, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]

During M and Spencer DD. Extracellular hippocampal glutamate and spontaneous seizure in the conscious human brain. Lancet 341: 1607–1610, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Freund TF and Buzsáki G. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 6: 347–470, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fujiwara-Tsukamoto Y, Isomura Y, Kaneda K, and Takada M. Synaptic interactions between pyramidal cells and interneurone subtypes during seizure-like activity in the rat hippocampus. J Physiol 557: 961–979, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fujiwara-Tsukamoto Y, Isomura Y, and Takada M. Comparable GABAergic mechanisms of hippocampal seizure-like activity in post-tetanic and low-Mg2+ conditions. J Neurophysiol 2005 Dec 7; [Epub ahead of print].

Gillies MJ, Traub RD, LeBeau FE, Davies CH, Gloveli T, Buhl EH, and Whittington MA. A model of atropine-resistant theta oscillations in rat hippocampal area CA1. J Physiol 543: 779–793, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Higashima M, Kinoshita H, Yamaguchi N, and Koshino Y. Activation of GABAergic function necessary for afterdischarge generation in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett 207: 101–104, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Isaev D, Isaeva E, Khazipov R, and Holmes GL. Anticonvulsant action of GABA in the high potassium-low magnesium model of ictogenesis in the neonatal rat hippocampus in vivo and in vitro. J Neurophysiol 94: 2987–2992, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kandel ER and Spencer WA. Excitation and inhibition of single pyramidal cells during hippocampal seizure. Exp Neurol 4: 162–179, 1961.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Khosravani H, Carlen PL, and Perez Velazquez JL. The control of seizure-like activity in the rat hippocampal slice. Biophys J 84: 687–695, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Khosravani H, Pinnegar CR, Mitchell JR, Bardakjian BL, Federico P, and Carlen PL. Increased high-frequency oscillations precede in vitro low-Mg seizures. Epilepsia 46: 1188–1197, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Klausberger T, Magill PJ, Marton LF, Roberts JDB, Cobden PM, Buzsáki G, and Somogyi P. Brain-state- and cell-type-specific firing of hippocampal interneurons in vivo. Nature 421: 844–848, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lopantsev V and Avoli M. Participation of GABAa-mediated inhibition in ictal-like discharges in the rat entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol 79: 352–360, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maccaferri G and Lacaille JC. Interneuron diversity series: hippocampal interneuron classifications—making things as simple as possible, not simpler. Trends Neurosci 26: 564–571, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Maccaferri G and McBain CJ. The hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) and its contribution to pacemaker activity in rat CA1 hippocampal stratum oriens-alveus interneurones. J Physiol 497: 119–130, 1996.[ISI][Medline]

Matsumoto H and Marsan CA. Cortical cellular phenomena in experimental epilepsy: ictal manifestation. Exp Neurol 25: 305–326, 1964.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Menendez de la Prida L, Benavides-Piccione R, Sola R, and Pozo MA. Electrophysiological properties of interneurons from intraoperative spiking areas of epileptic human temporal neocortex. Neuroreport 13: 1421–1425, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mooney R, Hoese W, and Nowicki S. Auditory representation of the vocal repertoire in a songbird with multiple song types. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 12778–12783, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Netoff TI and Schiff SJ. Decreased neuronal synchronization during experimental seizures. Neuroscience 22: 7297–7307, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oliva AA Jr, Lam TT, and Swann JW. Distally directed dendrotoxicity induced by kainic acid in hippocampal interneurons of green fluorescent protein-expressing transgenic mice. Neuroscience 22: 8052–8062, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Penfield W and Jasper H. Epilepsy and the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1954.

Perez-Velazquez JL. Bicarbonate-dependent depolarizing potentials in pyramidal cells and interneurons during epileptiform activity. Eur J Neurosci 18: 1337–1342, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Perez-Velazquez JL and Carlen PL. Synchronization of GABAergic interneuronal networks during seizure-like activity in the rat horizontal hippocampal slice. Eur J Neurosci 11: 4110–4118, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Pike FG, Goddard RS, Suckling JM, Ganter P, Kasthuri N, and Paulsen O. Distinct frequency preferences of different types of rat hippocampal neurones in response to oscillatory input currents. J Physiol 529: 205–213, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sanon N, Carmant L, Emond M, Congar P, and Lacaille JC. Short-term effects of kainic acid on CA1 hippocampal interneurons differentially vulnerable to excitotoxicity. Epilepsia 46: 837–848, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Santhakumar V and Soltesz I. Plasticity of interneuronal species diversity and parameter variance in neurological diseases. Trends Neurosci 27: 504–510, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Schiff SJ, Sauer T, Kumar R, and Weinstein SL. Neuronal spatiotemporal pattern discrimination: the dynamical evolution of seizures. Neuroimage 28: 1043–1055, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Somjen GG. Ions in the Brain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.

Somogyi P and Klausberger T. Defined types of cortical interneurone structure, space and spike timing in the hippocampus. J Physiol 562: 9–26, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Timofeev I, Grenier F, and Steriade M. The role of chloride-dependent inhibition and the activity of fast-spiking neurons during cortical spike-wave electrographic seizures. J Neurosci Methods 114: 1115–1132, 2002.

Timofeev I, Grenier F, and Steriade M. Contribution of intrinsic neuronal factors in the generation of cortically driven electrographic seizures. J Neurophysiol 92: 1133–1143, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Traub RD, Dudek FE, Snow RW, and Knowles WD. Computer simulations indicate that electrical field effects contribute to the shape of the epileptiform field potential. Neuroscience 15: 947–958, 1985b.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Traub RD, Dudek FE, Taylor CP, and Knowles WD. Simulation of hippocampal afterdischarges synchronized by electrical interactions. Neuroscience 14: 1033–1038, 1985a.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Westbrook GL. Seizures and epilepsy. In: Principles of Neural Science, edited by Kandel ER, Jessell TM, and Schwartz JH. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

Wyler AR, Ojemann GA, and Ward AA. Neurons in human epileptic cortex: correlation between unit and EEG activity. Ann Neurol 11: 301–308, 1982.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Zhang X-L, Zhang L, and Carlen PL. Electrotonic coupling between stratum oriens interneurones in the intact mouse juvenile hippocampus. J Physiol 558: 825–839, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ziburkus J, Cressman JR, Johnson KE, and Schiff SJ. Inhibitory and excitatory interplay: neuronal conductance measures during in vitro seizures. Epilepsia 46, Suppl. 8: 271–272, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. J. Voss, J. W. Sleigh, J. P. M. Barnard, and H. E. Kirsch
The Howling Cortex: Seizures and General Anesthetic Drugs
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1689 - 1703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Derchansky, S. S. Jahromi, M. Mamani, D. S. Shin, A. Sik, and P. L. Carlen
Transition to seizures in the isolated immature mouse hippocampus: a switch from dominant phasic inhibition to dominant phasic excitation
J. Physiol., January 15, 2008; 586(2): 477 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Spampanato and I. Mody
Spike Timing of Lacunosom-Moleculare Targeting Interneurons and CA3 Pyramidal Cells During High-Frequency Network Oscillations In Vitro
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 96 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. J. Trevelyan, D. Sussillo, B. O. Watson, and R. Yuste
Modular Propagation of Epileptiform Activity: Evidence for an Inhibitory Veto in Neocortex
J. Neurosci., November 29, 2006; 26(48): 12447 - 12455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/6/3948    most recent
01378.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziburkus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziburkus, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.