|
|
||||||||
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
1) Sangrey and colleagues interpret the experimental results of Fernandez et al. (1982)
as evidence that for the squid giant axon the maximum change of the voltage-dependent part of the capacitance occurs at the resting potential. Actually it is not possible to draw such a conclusion from these experiments. The measurements by Fernandez et al. were done at varying holding potentials in the frequency domain. Previous work by Bezanilla et al. (1982)
measured Qg versus Vm curves, which exhibit a rather unexpected behavior. The curves shift depending on the holding potential at which the measurements are done. For this reason the frequency domain measurements at different holding potentials do not translate in any transparent way into a voltage dependency of the gating capacitance during the propagated action potential. A more relevant description of the gating capacitance during the propagation was published by Armstrong and Bezanilla (1975)
. They measured the differential capacitance of an axon at 10-mV pulse intervals starting from a holding potential of 70 mV. This time course is more like the time course of an action potential than the measurements done at different holding potentials. Figure 9 of their work shows that the gating capacitance increases from 70 mV, reaches a maximum of 0.35 µF/cm2 at 10 mV, and then decreases. The assumption that the gating capacitance starts at a maximum at the resting potential and then decreases as m(t)the fraction of gating particles traversing the membraneincreases is incorrect.
2) Equation 3a of Sangrey et al. (2004)
![]() | (1) |
![]() |
The correct, model-independent expression for the gating current Ig(t) during propagation is
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() |
REFERENCES
Adrian RH. Conduction velocity and gating current in the squid giant axon. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 189: 8186, 1975.[Medline]
Armstrong CM and Bezanilla F. Currents associated with the ionic gating structures in nerve membrane. Ann NY Acad Sci 264: 265277, 1975.[ISI][Medline]
Bezanilla F, Taylor RE, and Fernandez JM. Distribution and kinetics of membrane dielectric polarization. I. Long-term activation of gating currents. J Gen Physiol 79: 2140, 1982.
Fernandez JM, Bezanilla F, and Taylor RE. Distribution and kinetics of membrane dielectric polarization. II. Frequency domain studies of gating currents. J Gen Physiol 79: 4167, 1982.
Hodgkin AH. The optimum density of sodium channels in an unmyelinated nerve. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270: 297300, 1975.[ISI][Medline]
Hunter PJ, McNaughton PA, and Noble D. Analytical models of propagation in excitable cells. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 30: 99144, 1975.[Medline]
Sangrey TD, Friesen WO, and Levy WB. Analysis of the optimal channel density of the squid giant axon using a reparameterized HodgkinHuxley model. J Neurophysiol 91: 25412550, 2004.
Nikola Jurisic
Jules Stein Eye Institute
Geffen School of Medicine
University of California
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Francisco Bezanilla
Institute for Molecular Pediatric Sciences
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. B. Levy, P. Crotty, T. Sangrey, and O. Friesen Reply J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 960 - 960. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |