| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REPORT
Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Submitted 19 December 2005; accepted in final form 7 June 2006
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; Cobb et al. 1995; Fisahn et al. 2004; Klausberger et al. 2003; Traub et al. 2004; Westbrook and Lothman 1983; Whittington and Traub 2003). This effect has been tied to the ability of kainate to modulate excitability and regulate interneuron firing rates (Cossart et al. 1998; Frerking et al. 1998). The slow decay kinetics of KAR currents make them particularly effective because of a long time window over which synaptic integration could occur (Castillo et al. 1997; Cossart et al. 2002).
Distinct morphological classes of interneurons differentially affect rhythmic network activity (Buzsaki and Draguhn 2004; Whittington and Traub 2003). For example, hippocampal stratum oriens lacunosum-moleculare (O-LM) and bistratified interneurons synapse on CA1 pyramidal dendrites within lacunosum moleculare and stratum radiatum where they modulate excitatory inputs and promote rhythmic theta waves (Halasy et al. 1996; Klausberger et al. 2004). However, stratum oriens (SO) trilaminar cells (Sik et al. 1995) synapse in the somatic and perisomatic region, where they contribute to the generation of gamma rhythms (Traub et al. 2004). Therefore determining cell-specific KAR distributions may provide important clues about KAR-mediated effects on cell excitability. The targeting of KARs to key positions along the dendrite could allow for focused, process-specific tuning of excitability. For example, activation of perisomatic or branchpoint receptors would allow for maximal impact on the filtering and integration of synaptic inputs and action potential propagation (Larkum et al. 2001; Sandler and Ross 1999; Tsubokawa and Ross 1997; Vetter et al. 2001).
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Standard techniques were used to prepare 300-µm-thick slices from the hippocampus of 2- to 3-wk-old rats. Whole cell voltage-clamp recordings (–70 mV) were made from CA1 SO interneurons. The patch pipette was filled with a cesium gluconate solution containing (in mM) 100 gluconic acid, 5 EGTA, 5 MgCl2, 2 ATP, 0.3 GTP, and 40 HEPES; pH to 7.2 with CsOH. Slices were superfused at room temperature with oxygenated physiological saline (in mM: 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.5 CaCl2, 1 NaH2PO4, 26.2 NaHCO3, and 11 glucose). Recordings were accepted only if the holding current was <100 pA. Data were collected and analyzed with Igor Pro (Wavemetrics, Lake Oswego, OR).
Photolysis experiments
The multiline UV output of a continuous emission 5-W krypton ion laser (Coherent, Innova 302) was delivered, by optical fiber, through an Olympus x 40 water-immersion objective to form a 5.7-µm uncaging spot. (Pettit et al. 1997; Wang and Augustine 1995). Each uncaging location was sampled three times before moving to a new location.
Density measurements
Surface area (A = 2
rh) was calculated by assuming the dendrite was a cylinder with length equal to the size of the uncaging spot (5.7 µm) and a diameter measured as the profile of fluorescence intensity across the width of the process (Pettit and Augustine 2000). Cells with dendrites that did not produce a clear intensity profile were not analyzed. The somal uncaging area was calculated using previously measured beam characteristics (Wang and Augustine 1995) to estimate the upper and lower surface area of the soma exposed to photolysis (498 µm2).
Histology
Cells were filled for 1 h with neurobiotin (1%) after completion of a mapping experiment. Slices were postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, stained for neurobiotin with avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), developed with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, and sectioned on the cryostat (100 µm). A x 25 oil-immersion lens was used for camera lucida drawings. Of the 61 interneurons mapped, 43 cells had neurobiotin fills sufficient to allow identification of the axon terminations. Three types of interneurons were found: O-LM (n = 17), trilaminar (n = 17), and bistratified (n = 9).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Regional variations in dendritic KAR current density were functionally mapped using local photolysis of bath applied 4-methoxy-7-nitroindolinyl (MNI)-caged L-glutamate (200 µM; Tocris, Ellisville, MO). Whole cell recordings were obtained from SO interneurons in the presence of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channel blockers (TTX, 1 µM; cadmium, 50 µM). Cesium was included in the pipette solution to improve voltage clamp by blocking potassium channels. Dendrites were visualized by including Oregon-green BAPTA (200 µM) in the recording pipettes, and maps were created by sequentially positioning the UV light spot (
6 µm) at nonoverlapping locations (>12 µm apart).
Photolysis (1–2 ms; 5–10 mW) evoked inward synaptic and extrasynaptic receptor currents in the presence of selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA; D-APV, 50 µM) and GABA (picrotoxin, 50 µM) receptor blockers. Uncaging locations were identified on the live image by measuring their distance along the dendrite and natural anatomical landmarks. This approach produced reliable current responses at each location (Fig. 1A). After creating a mixed AMPA/KAR map, KARs were isolated by bath application of the AMPA receptor antagonist GYKI 53655 (GYKI, 50 µM), and KAR maps were produced by revisiting each location. Subsequent bath application of the nonselective AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist NBQX (5 µM) blocked all photolytic current, confirming that the currents were caused by KAR activation (n = 7). Live images of the cell were acquired with a confocal microscope (Olympus Fluoview 300). We examined three different SO interneuron subtypes: O-LM, trilaminar, and bistratified. Comparison of multiple dendritic maps revealed three distinctive KAR distributions.
|
These interneurons are characterized by KAR-mediated responses at all locations on the dendrites and cell body, with horizontal multi- or bipolar dendrites confined to the SO (Fig. 1B; n = 28). Application of GYKI reduced mixed AMPA/KAR current amplitude [143 ± 8 (SE) pA; n = 147 spots] at an individual location by 75.4 ± 3.8% (n = 10 cells) leaving small amplitude KAR currents (35 ± 5 pA; n = 147 spots). Current density was calculated by dividing current amplitude by the surface area at each location (Fig. 1C). To allow comparisons between cells and for variance in glutamate concentration caused by differences in uncaging time or laser power, values were normalized to the dendritic density in the most proximal bin (<50 µm; Fig. 1D; n = 23). Figure 1, C and D, shows that KAR current density increased with distance along the dendrite, doubling in density at the most distal locations. This increase in density was mirrored by the KA/AMPAR ratio, which also increased with distance along the dendrite (Fig. 1E). Both O-LM (n = 12) and trilaminar (n = 11) interneurons expressed this diffuse distribution of KAR current density (Fig. 1F; Table 1).
|
Another group of interneurons are characterized by robust AMPAR-mediated currents and little or no response to caged agonist following GYKI application (50 µM). These cells also have horizontal multipolar dendrites in the SO. This group contains two types of cells. One type has AMPA currents and no KAR currents (Fig. 2A; n = 7), whereas the other group is characterized by small KAR currents restricted to "hot spots" at discrete locations such as the soma and branch points (Fig. 2, B and C; n = 13). Application of NBQX (5 µM) blocked the remaining KAR-mediated current (Fig. 2B). Average KAR current densities and KA/AMPAR ratios at "hot spots" were similar to that seen on the diffuse distribution interneurons (Fig. 2D; n = 13). Morphological analysis showed that nonresponders and focal responders were either O-LM (n = 5) or trilaminar cells (n = 6; Fig. 2D; Table 1) (McBain et al. 1994; Sik et al. 1995).
|
These cells have vertical multipolar dendrites extending into SO and s. radiatum. They exhibit KAR currents on all dendrites located within SO, but the dendrites extending into s. radiatum do not have photolytically elicited KAR currents (Fig. 3, A–D; n = 13). S. radiatum dendrites did respond to glutamate because they expressed AMPA currents. Increasing laser power over these dendrites also failed to yield currents (Fig. 3C; n = 4). Similar attempts to increase the sensitivity of our assay such as increasing uncaging time or caged glutamate concentration (600 µM) also failed to elicit KAR currents. Density plots and KAR/AMPA current ratios along the length of all active dendrites look similar to the uniform density plots. KAR densities and ratios increased with distance along the dendrite (Fig. 3, D and E; n = 9). As with uniform density neurons, GYKI application reduced peak current amplitude 78 ± 2.3% (n = 9). Of the three cells examined, only bistratified interneurons (Sik et al. 1995), which synapse in the s. radiatum (Halasy et al. 1996), showed this distribution (Fig. 3F; n = 9).
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
We have previously shown that synaptic and extrasynaptic AMPA/KARs on CA1 interneurons exhibit current densities that increase with distance from the cell body, despite synaptic innervation densities that seem homogenous (Pettit and Augustine 2000). This gradient may act to amplifying distal synaptic signals, compensating for distance-dependent signal attenuation (Eder et al. 2003; Magee and Cook 2000; Pettit and Augustine 2000). Although the increase was modest, we found a similar gradient of KAR current density in SO interneurons. Given that we measured currents at the soma, it is possible that dendritic currents generated at distal dendritic sites were attenuated, causing us to underestimate KAR current density. However, the sizable length constant (1.1) of these cells (Lacaille and Williams 1990), and the fact that our measurements were made from dendritic regions within 300 µm of the soma, suggest that distance-dependent attenuation of current amplitude should not exceed 25%.
Focal density interneurons were characterized by an absence of KAR-mediated currents over much of the dendritic tree. Although we see some cells that have no KAR currents, we cannot definitively state they are different from the focal response cells, because it is not possible to sample every region of dendrite on a single cell. As a result, we placed both response profiles in the same group. The lack of KAR currents is surprising because we have seen currents on all other cell types tested including CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cell dendrites where density should be low because they do not have synaptic KARs (Castillo et al. 1997; Cossart et al. 2002; Lerma et al. 1997). We were initially concerned that our technique was not sensitive enough to detect KARs at low densities. As a result, we tried tripling laser power, uncaging time, or glutamate concentration. These manipulations failed to elicit KAR currents. While focal density cells may represent a separate population of O-LM and trilaminar neurons, there were no anatomical differences between these cells and diffuse distribution cells. Selective positioning of KARs at "hot spots" such as branch points may be a way to achieve maximal impact for a small number of receptors. Branch points are locations where backpropagating action potentials fail and subthreshold currents may be attenuated (Larkum et al. 2001; Vetter et al. 2001). Therefore depolarizing KARs at this location could act to boost signals (Sandler and Ross 1999).
Bistratified interneurons (Freund and Buzsaki 1996) have uniform current densities on all dendrites except those descending into s. radiatum. This lack of current in the s. radiatum cannot be caused by signal attenuation because these cells are characterized by failure of KAR current within 20 µm of the soma. Conversely, uniform distribution dendrites produce substantial currents at distances >275 µm (Figs. 2 and 3). Given that dendrites enter the s. radiatum over shorter distances than 275 µm, this cannot explain the lack of currents on radiatum dendrites. While it is not clear why the KAR density is so low on s. radiatum dendrites, these cells may provide a unique opportunity for studying receptor targeting mechanisms. One consequence of excluding KARs from the s. radiatum is a potential reduction of synaptic strength. Because these currents have a slower decay (
KAR = 52.8 ± 3.9 ms; AMPAR = 15.9 ± 1.1 ms; n = 20), inclusion of KARs in the synapse should substantially increase charge transfer and synaptic efficacy. As a result, excitatory inputs to s. radiatum dendrites may be less heavily weighted than inputs to SO dendrites. Interestingly, s. radiatum dendrites are the only SO cell dendrites likely to receive input from CA3 (Buhl et al. 1996), and exclusion of KARs may limit the impact of CA3/Schaffer collateral synapses.
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. L. Pettit, Dept. of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., K426, Bronx, NY 10461. (E-mail: dpettit{at}aecom.yu.edu)
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Buhl EH, Szilagyi T, Halasy K, and Somogyi P. Physiological properties of anatomically identified basket and bistratified cells in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus in vitro. Hippocampus 6: 294–305, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Buzsaki G and Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304: 1926–1929, 2004.
Castillo PE, Malenka RC, and Nicoll RA. Kainate receptors mediate a slow postsynaptic current in hippocampal CA3 neurons. Nature 388: 182–186, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cobb SR, Buhl EH, Halasy K, Paulsen O, and Somogyi P. Synchronization of neuronal activity in hippocampus by individual GABAergic interneurons. Nature 378: 75–78, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cossart R, Epsztein J, Tyzio R, Becq H, Hirsch J, Ben-Ari Y, and Crepel V. Quantal release of glutamate generates pure kainate and mixed AMPA/kainate EPSCs in hippocampal neurons. Neuron 35: 147–159, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cossart R, Esclapez M, Hirsch JC, Bernard C, and Ben-Ari Y. GluR5 kainate receptor activation in interneurons increases tonic inhibition of pyramidal cells. Nat Neurosci 1: 470–478, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Eder M, Becker K, Rammes G, Schierloh A, Azad SC, Zieglgansberger W, and Dodt HU. Distribution and properties of functional postsynaptic kainate receptors on neocortical layer V pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 23: 6660–6670, 2003.
Fisahn A, Contractor A, Traub RD, Buhl EH, Heinemann SF, and McBain CJ. Distinct roles for the kainate receptor subunits GluR5 and GluR6 in kainate-induced hippocampal gamma oscillations. J Neurosci 24: 9658–9668, 2004.
Frerking M, Malenka RC, and Nicoll RA. Synaptic activation of kainate receptors on hippocampal interneurons. Nat Neurosci 1: 479–486, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Freund TF and Buzsaki G. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 6: 347–470, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Halasy K, Buhl EH, Lorinczi Z, Tamas G, and Somogyi P. Synaptic target selectivity and input of GABAergic basket and bistratified interneurons in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus. Hippocampus 6: 306–329, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Klausberger T, Magill PJ, Marton LF, Roberts JD, Cobden PM, Buzsaki G, and Somogyi P. Brain-state- and cell-type-specific firing of hippocampal interneurons in vivo. Nature 421: 844–848, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klausberger T, Marton LF, Baude A, Roberts JD, Magill PJ, and Somogyi P. Spike timing of dendrite-targeting bistratified cells during hippocampal network oscillations in vivo. Nat Neurosci 7: 41–47, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Lacaille JC and Williams S. Membrane properties of interneurons in stratum oriens-alveus of the CA1 region of rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuroscience 36: 349–359, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Larkum ME, Zhu JJ, and Sakmann B. Dendritic mechanisms underlying the coupling of the dendritic with the axonal action potential initiation zone of adult rat layer 5 pyramidal neurons. J Physiol 533: 447–466, 2001.
Lerma J, Morales M, Vicente MA, and Herreras O. Glutamate receptors of the kainate type and synaptic transmission. Trends Neurosci 20: 9–12, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Magee JC and Cook EP. Somatic EPSP amplitude is independent of synapse location in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci 3: 895–903, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
McBain CJ, DiChiara TJ, and Kauer JA. Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors differentially affects two classes of hippocampal interneurons and potentiates excitatory synaptic transmission. J Neurosci 14: 4433–4445, 1994.[Abstract]
Pettit DL and Augustine GJ. Distribution of functional glutamate and GABA receptors on hippocampal pyramidal cells and interneurons. J Neurophysiol 84: 28–38, 2000.
Pettit DL, Wang SS, Gee KR, and Augustine GJ. Chemical two-photon uncaging: a novel approach to mapping glutamate receptors. Neuron 19: 465–471, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sandler VM and Ross WN. Serotonin modulates spike backpropagation and associated [Ca2+]i changes in the apical dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol 81: 216–224, 1999.
Sik A, Penttonen M, Ylinen A, and Buzsaki G. Hippocampal CA1 interneurons: an in vivo intracellular labeling study. J Neurosci 15: 6651–6665, 1995.
Traub RD, Bibbig A, LeBeau FE, Buhl EH, and Whittington MA. Cellular mechanisms of neuronal population oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 247–278, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Tsubokawa H and Ross WN. Muscarinic modulation of spike backpropagation in the apical dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 17: 5782–5791, 1997.
Vetter P, Roth A, and Hausser M. Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. J Neurophysiol 85: 926–937, 2001.
Wang SS and Augustine GJ. Confocal imaging and local photolysis of caged compounds: dual probes of synaptic function. Neuron 15: 755–760, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Westbrook GL and Lothman EW. Cellular and synaptic basis of kainic acid-induced hippocampal epileptiform activity. Brain Res 273: 97–109, 1983.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Whittington MA and Traub RD. Interneuron diversity series: inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations in vitro. Trends Neurosci 26: 676–682, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Z. Harris and D. L. Pettit Recruiting Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptors Augments Synaptic Signaling J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 524 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Z. Harris and D. L. Pettit Extrasynaptic and synaptic NMDA receptors form stable and uniform pools in rat hippocampal slices J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 509 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Goldin, J. Epsztein, I. Jorquera, A. Represa, Y. Ben-Ari, V. Crepel, and R. Cossart Synaptic Kainate Receptors Tune Oriens-Lacunosum Moleculare Interneurons to Operate at Theta Frequency J. Neurosci., September 5, 2007; 27(36): 9560 - 9572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Yang, A. Z. Harris, and D. L. Pettit Synaptic kainate currents reset interneuron firing phase J. Physiol., January 1, 2007; 578(1): 259 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
