|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REPORT
Department of Neuroscience, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
Submitted 20 January 2006; accepted in final form 6 July 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Committee of Ethics on Animal Experiments of Yamaguchi University School of Medicine and carried out according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health publication 8023) revised 1996. Surgical procedures were performed as previously described (Ishikawa and Nakamura 2003
). In brief, male rats (n = 5, 290315 g) were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone (50 mg/kg, ip). The head was fixed horizontally in a stereotaxic instrument (Narishige) and the body temperature maintained at 3637°C. Small holes were made in the skull to enable vertical insertions of electrodes. Bipolar stimulating electrodes, which were also used to record field potentials in the mPFC, were positioned in the mPFC [anterior (A) to the bregma, 3.03.2 mm; lateral (L) to the midline, 0.75 mm; ventral (V) to the brain surface, 3.5 mm] and in the basolateral nucleus of amygdala (BLA) [posterior (P), 3.0 mm; L, 5.0 mm]. The depths of the electrodes (V, 7.38.0 mm) for BLA stimulation were adjusted to maximize the amplitude of the BLA-evoked field potential in the mPFC (Fig. 1). This procedure aided the placement of stimulating electrodes in the BLA, because there are dense reciprocal connections between the mPFC and BLA (McDonald 1987
; Sesack at al. 1989
).
|
Single unit activity in the VH (P, 6.5 mm; L, 5.4 mm; V, 3.06.0 mm) was recorded using a glass micropipette (510 M
). Electrical stimuli were delivered as a single pulse of 0.1 ms at 0.5 Hz (intensity, 0.15.0 mA). The following criteria were used to discriminate spikes antidromically driven by mPFC or BLA stimulation: a fixed latency at the threshold for activation; the ability to follow twin pulse stimulation at intervals shorter than 3 ms; and collision with spontaneous spikes for spontaneously active cells. In VH neurons projecting to both the mPFC and BLA, we calculated the conduction time (x) from the soma to the branch point using the following equation: x = [(tmPFC + tBLA) (tcolli tref)]/2, where tmPFC and tBLA are the antidromic latencies to mPFC and BLA stimulation, and tref and tcolli indicate the refractory time and the time for collision, respectively (Shirokawa and Nakamura 1987
).
Verification of recording and stimulating sites
Recording and stimulating sites were marked by applications of pontamine sky blue (10 µA for 5 min) and a DC of 30 µA for 1 min through each electrode. At the end of each experiment animals were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution, and the brains were removed. Frozen coronal sections of 50 µm, including the mPFC, VH, or BLA, were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Recording and stimulating sites were reconstructed according to the rat brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1998)
.
Injection of retrograde fluorescent dyes
True Blue (TB) and Diamidino Yellow (DY) (Sigma, St Louis, MO) were dissolved in distilled water at 2.5 and 2% concentrations, respectively. Three rats were injected with TB and DY using 1-µl Hamilton syringes with 25-gauge needles. After the described surgical operation, TB and DY were injected into the mPFC and BLA, respectively, with a volume of 0.16 µl over a period of 5 min. The stereotaxic coordinates of the mPFC and BLA were determined in the same way as used in the electrophysiological experiments. The inserted needle was withdrawn 1015 min after injection.
Histological preparation and microscopic examination
After 7 days, the rats were deeply anesthetized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbitone and perfused with 4% PFA solution, and the brains were removed. After postfixation and dehydration with 4% PFA solution containing 1030% sucrose, the brains were coronally sectioned at 40 µm. The sections including the mPFC, amygdala and VH were mounted onto a gelatin-coated slide glass and examined using a fluorescent microscope (BX-FLA, Olympus) with a UV filter inducing excitation light of
360-nm wavelength. Labeling with TB and DY was seen as blue fluorescence in the perikarya and yellow fluorescence in the nuclei, respectively.
Data analysis
All data are expressed as means ± SE. We used paired Student's t-test to compare two sets of data. Differences are considered significant at P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The tips of stimulating electrodes and centers of injection sites were located in the ventral portion of the prelimbic cortex (v-PrL) and in the BLA, although the diffusion areas of DY and TB included parts of basomedial and lateral nucleus of amygdala and the infralimbic cortex (Fig. 1). In the circuit from the BLA to the PrL, characteristic negative-going field potentials were recorded with a peak latency of
20 ms (Fig. 1).
Antidromic responses of VH neurons to mPFC and amygdala stimulations
A total of 25 VH (8 CA1 and 17 subicular) neurons were antidromically activated by mPFC and/or BLA stimulation (Fig. 2). Of these 25 VH neurons, 13 (52%) had antidromical responses to both mPFC and BLA stimulation, in contrast the remaining 12 neurons were antidromically activated by either mPFC (n = 6) or BLA (n = 6) stimulation. Of the 13 neurons projecting to both the mPFC and amygdala, 8 were located in the subiculum and 5 in the CA1 region. The eight subicular neurons had shorter antidromic latencies to BLA stimulation (9.1 ± 0.7 ms) compared with mPFC stimulation (13.1 ± 1.8 ms; t = 2.61, df = 7, P < 0.05). There was no difference in antidromic latencies of the five CA1 neurons to the mPFC stimulation (12.2 ± 1.7 ms) and BLA stimulation (11.9 ± 2.0 ms). A typical example of a VH neuron showing antidromic responses from both the mPFC and the BLA is shown in Fig. 2, AC. The mean conduction time from the soma to the branch point, which was calculated using the equation described in METHODS, ranged from 0 to 1 ms (mean, 0.3 ± 0.1 ms, n = 8). This shows that the axons of VH neurons projecting to both the mPFC and BLA bifurcated near or at the soma.
|
The VH neurons having blue fluorescence in their perikarya or yellow fluorescence in their nuclei were broadly distributed in the CA1 and subicular regions. A larger number of VH neurons double labeled with both TB and DY were seen mainly in the subiculum and the CA1 (Fig. 3).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was found that VH neurons projecting to both the mPFC and amygdala were predominantly located in the subiculum and CA1. This is consistent with previous reports that the CA1 and subicular neurons in the VH project mainly to the mPFC (Jay and Witter 1991
), and the amygdala receives major afferents from the subiculum and the CA1 region (Canteras and Swanson 1992
; Pitkanen et al. 2000
). Furthermore, these VH neurons are likely to innervate BLA neurons projecting to the v-PrL, which also receives direct inputs from the same VH neurons. This indicates that there are direct and indirect circuits from the same VH neurons to the v-PrL. In view of the modulatory effects of emotional states on the memory formation, it is possible that the indirect pathways through the BLA provide emotional information in the direct signal processing from the VH to the v-PrL, which plays crucial roles in short-term and working memory (Floresco et al. 1997
; Seamans et al. 1998
).
Because CA1 neurons projecting to both the mPFC and amygdala had approximately the same antidromic latencies to mPFC and amygdala stimulation, it is suggested that activation of those CA1 neurons causes simultaneous activation of both the mPFC and the amygdala. This seems to be in accordance with the hypothesis that synchronized firings of neurons in different brain regions are crucial for integration of multimodal information in cognitive brain mechanisms (Engel et al. 1999
; Singer 1999
). In contrast subicular neurons, which had shorter antidromic latencies to amygdala stimulation than to mPFC stimulation, may be involved differently in the functions related to the mPFC and amygdala. Both mPFC and amygdalar neurons show firing activity entrained to hippocampal theta rhythm, which is involved in memory formation or emotional regulation (Jensen 2005
; McNaughton and Gray 2000
; Pape et al. 1998
; Seidenbecher et al. 2003
). Therefore our findings suggest that simultaneous inputs from the same VH neurons may induce synchronized theta activity in the mPFC and amygdala. Because theta rhythm in the mPFC and amygdala have been reported to have a role in memory and emotion processes, respectively (Jensen 2005
; Seidenbecher et al. 2003
), theta rhythm synchronization of mPFC and amygdalar neurons may be important for the association of memory and emotion.
Because the VH plays crucial roles in both working memory and emotional behaviors (Hobin et al. 2006
; Seamans et al. 1998
; Trivedi and Coover 2004
), our study suggests that the same VH neurons may be activated during both of these processes. A recent study has reported that the microinjection of muscimol into the VH induced impairment of fear memory retrieval after extinction (Hobin et al. 2006
). Considering that the amygdala and mPFC are implicated in fear memory extinction (Akirav et al. 2006
; Milad and Quirk 2002
; Morgan et al. 1993
; Sotres-Bayon et al. 2006
), VH neurons projecting to both the amygdala and mPFC may play a crucial role in fear memory retrieval after extinction. Further experiments are needed to elucidate the functional roles of VH neurons in memory and emotion in relation to the mPFC and amygdala.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Ishikawa, Dept. of Neuroscience, Yamaguchi Univ. School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minamikogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan (E-mail: akinori{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp)
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bannerman DM, Rawlins JNP, McHugh SB, Deacon RMJ, Yee BK, Bast T, Zhang W-N, Pothuizen HJ, and Feldon J. Regional dissociations within the hippocampal-memory and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28: 273283, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Canteras NS and Swanson LW. Projections of ventral subiculum to the amygdala, septum and hypothalamus: a PHAL anterograde tract-tracing study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 324: 180194, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Engel AK, Fries P, Konig P, Brecht M, and Singer W. Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Conscious Cogn 8: 128151, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Floresco SB, Seamans JK, and Phillips AG. Selective roles for hippocampal, prefrontal cortical, and ventral striatal circuits in radial-arm maze tasks with or without a delay. J Neurosci 17: 18801890, 1997.
Hobin JA, Ji J, and Maren S. Ventral hippocampal muscimol disrupts context-specific fear memory retrieval after extinction in rats. Hippocampus 16: 174182, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ishikawa A and Nakamura S. Convergence and interaction of hippocampal and amygdalar inputs to the medial prefrontal cortex in rats. J Neurosci 23: 99879995, 2003.
Ishikawa A and Nakamura S. Antidromic activation of rat ventral hippocampal neurons from prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Neurosci Res Suppl 50: S195, 2004.
Jarrard LE. On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behav Neural Biol 60: 926, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jay TM and Witter MP. Distribution of hippocampal CA1 and subicular efferents in the prefrontal cortex of the rat studied by means of anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin. J Comp Neurol 313: 574586, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jensen O. Reading the hippocampal code by theta phase-locking. Trends Cogn Sci 9: 551553, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
McDonald AJ. Organization of amygdaloid projections to the mediodorsal thalamus and prefrontal cortex: a fluorescence retrograde transport study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 262: 4658, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
McNaughton N and Gray JA. Anxiolytic action on the behavioural inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety. J Affect Disord 61: 161176, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Milad MR and Quirk GJ. Neurons in medial prefrontal cortex signal memory for fear extinction. Nature 420: 7074, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morgan MA, Romanski LM, and LeDoux JE. Extinction of emotional learning: contribution of medial prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Lett 163: 109113, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Pape HC, Pare D, and Driesang RB. Two types of intrinsic oscillations in neurons of the lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala. J Neurophysiol 79: 205216, 1998.
Paxinos G and Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1998.
Pitkanen A, Pikkarainen M, Nurminen N, and Ylinen A. Reciprocal connections between the amygdala and the hippocampal formation, perirhinal cortex, and postrhinal cortex in rat. A review. Ann NY Acad Sci 911: 369391, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
Seamans JK, Floresco SB, and Phillips AG. D1 receptor modulation of hippocampal-prefrontal cortical circuits integrating spatial memory with execute functions in the rat. J Neurosci 18: 16131621, 1998.
Seidenbecher T, Laxmi TR, Stork O, and Pape H-C. Amygdalar and hippocampal theta rhythm synchronization during fear memory retrieval. Science 301: 846850, 2003.
Sesack SR, Deutch AY, Roth RH, and Bunney BS. Topographical organization of the efferent projections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: an anterograde tract-tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. J Comp Neurol 290: 213242, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Shirokawa T and Nakamura S. Antidromic activation of rat dorsomedial hypothalamic neurons from locus coeruleus and median eminence. Brain Res Bull 18: 291295, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relation? Neuron 24: 111125, 1999.
Sotres-Bayon F, Bush DEA, and LeDoux JE. Emotional perseveration: an update on prefrontal-amygdala interactions in fear extinction. Learn Mem 11: 525535, 2006.
Squire LR. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychol Rev 99: 195231, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Trivedi MA and Coover GD. Lesions of the ventral hippocampus but not the dorsal hippocampus impair conditioned fear expression and inhibitory avoidance on the elevated T-maze. Neurobiol Learn Mem 81: 172184, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Schon, Y. T. Quiroz, M. E. Hasselmo, and C. E. Stern Greater Working Memory Load Results in Greater Medial Temporal Activity at Retrieval Cereb Cortex, February 18, 2009; (2009) bhp006v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. LoPresti, K. Schon, M. D. Tricarico, J. D. Swisher, K. A. Celone, and C. E. Stern Working Memory for Social Cues Recruits Orbitofrontal Cortex and Amygdala: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Delayed Matching to Sample for Emotional Expressions J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3718 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |