| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Unité de Physiologie et Biomécanique de la Locomotion, Département D'Éducation Physique et de Réadaptation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; and 2Department of Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Submitted 31 March 2006; accepted in final form 8 July 2006
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
) and some neurons have axons that cross the midline at the cervical or lumbar levels and innervate the gray matter of both sides (Matsuyama et al. 1988, 1997, 1999). In addition, reticulospinal axons also terminate on commissural interneurons so that an action on contralateral activity may also be mediated by this pathway (Jankowska et al. 2003; Matsuyama et al. 2004). As such, there is a firm anatomical substrate demonstrating that reticulospinal neurons can produce widespread effects throughout the neuraxis, including both ipsi- and contralateral to the cell body.
Functional studies provide evidence that this anatomical substrate is used to facilitate the coordination of interlimb activity and to produce the complex patterns of muscular activity that are used to provide postural support in response to voluntary movements or unpredictable perturbations. In some of the earliest studies of the PMRF, Sprague and Chambers (1954) expanded on Magoun's original thesis of a structure producing global excitation or inhibition (Magoun 1944; Magoun and Rhines 1946) to demonstrate that lower-intensity stimulation of the PMRF in the decerebrate cat produced coordinated patterns of flexion and extension in the four limbs with flexion predominating in ipsilateral limbs and extension in contralateral limbs. More recent studies in awake animals have further amplified our understanding of the complex nature of the reticulospinal pathways. Microstimulation studies in awake cats (Drew and Rossignol 1990a) confirmed Sprague and Chamber's (1954) original findings of a predominant ipsilateral flexion and contralateral extension bias (together with ipsilateral head turning), although recordings of electromyographic (EMG) activity also showed that the stimulation was equally effective in activating ipsilateral extensors and contralateral flexors (Drew and Rossignol 1990b). Moreover, a recent study has shown strong bilateral projections to shoulder muscles in the primate (Davidson and Buford 2004). Together, these studies confirm that the PMRF is capable of influencing muscle activity at all levels of the neuraxis, both ipsi- and contralateral to the stimulation site.
Although stimulation to the PMRF produced a single characteristic pattern of activity when the cat was at rest, stimulation during walking transformed this pattern of activity into a more functional one that produced appropriate phase-dependent activation of muscles (Drew 1991; Drew and Rossignol 1984; Orlovsky 1972; Perreault et al. 1994). In the intact cat (Drew 1991), stimulation during the swing phase of the ipsilateral forelimb increased responses in ipsilateral flexors and, simultaneously, in contralateral extensors. Stimulation during contralateral swing facilitated activity in the contralateral flexors and produced facilitation or suppression of ipsilateral extensors. Responses were also observed in hindlimb flexor and extensor muscles and were, likewise, phase dependent. We have argued that this pattern of activity provides a flexible substrate that would appropriately facilitate the integration of postural responses into the locomotor pattern.
In support of this proposition, recent studies (Drew et al. 2004; Prentice and Drew 2001) showed that a large proportion of cells, including identified reticulospinal neurons (RSNs), exhibited multiple increases in activity as each limb in turn stepped over the obstacle. We suggested that the discharge activity of these cells provided information concerning the time and magnitude of the postural activity that occurred in the supporting limbs as any one limb stepped over the obstacle. However, we suggested that they could not specify the details of the postural pattern which would depend on the excitability of the spinal circuits and would be contingent on activity in other descending pathways. In this hypothesis, a substantial aspect of the final determination of the postural pattern is thus dependent on the rhythmical changes in the excitability of the spinal interneurons onto which these fibers impinge. Discharge activity occurring during ipsilateral swing would facilitate ipsilateral flexor muscles and contralateral extensor muscles, whereas activity occurring during ipsilateral stance would facilitate ipsilateral extensors and contralateral flexors (see Fig. 3 in Drew et al. 2004 and Fig. 16 in this manuscript).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
). The question we now address is how the discharge activity of these cells is modified when the cat makes a reach with the right limb, contralateral to the recording site. In this situation, in which there is no base rhythmical activity in the spinal networks (as during locomotion), does the reticulospinal system continue to produce a similar pattern of activity during reaches of both the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs, or does it, instead, produce a pattern of activity specific to the requirements of each reach? For example, reaches of the left limb require increased activity in the extensors of the right forelimb and the left hindlimb while movements of the right limb require increased extensor activity in the left forelimb and the right hindlimb, i.e., reciprocal patterns of activity (see Figs. 2 and 3). The results favor a contribution to postural control similar to that observed during locomotion.
Preliminary results from these experiments have been published in abstract form (Schepens and Drew 2000, 2001, 2003b)
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
These experiments were performed on the same two cats (RS22 and RS23) used in our previous publications (Schepens and Drew 2003a, 2004). All surgical and experimental procedures are described in detail in those two papers.
In brief, cats were trained to stand quietly on four force platforms and to reach to a tube to obtain a food reward (Fig. 1). A shutter over the end of the tube, and controlled by computer, denied access outside the confines of the task. Cats were trained to reach with both the left and right forelimbs. After training, the cats were prepared for surgery under general anesthesia (2–3% isoflurane with oxygen) and in sterile conditions. A rectangular base-plate (internal measurements: 10 * 8 mm) was implanted over the left cerebellum to provide access to the brain stem reticular formation, and pairs of Teflon-insulated, stainless-steel wires were sewn, bilaterally, into the muscle bellies of selected fore- and hindlimb muscles as well as some axial muscles. The muscles used in these studies and details of their activation patterns can be found in Schepens and Drew (2004). Three microwires (50 µm diam) were inserted into the spinal cord at L2 to provide a means of antidromically identifying reticulospinal cells projecting to the ipsilateral, lumbar spinal cord. After surgery the cats were administered analgesics during a period of 48 h (buprenorphrine 5 µg/kg) and antibiotics during a period of 
10 days (penicillin G 40,000 IU). All surgical procedures were approved by the institutional ethics committee and followed National guidelines.
After recovery from the surgery, an electrode was introduced into the PMRF and the discharge activity of single neurons was recorded. All isolated single neurons were recorded, regardless of whether they could be antidromically identified from the microwire electrodes inserted at L2 (RSNs) or not (unidentified neurons). After isolation of a single neuron, cell discharge activity was recorded during a period of treadmill locomotion, and the cat was then transferred to the reaching apparatus. All isolated cells were recorded during both tasks, when possible, regardless of the pattern of discharge activity on the treadmill. Discharge activity was recorded during a minimum of five reaches from each forelimb (generally, 5 reaches with the left forelimb, 10 reaches with the right forelimb, and then 5 more with the left forelimb). Supplementary reaches, if present, were made in blocks of five with each limb. The cat was then transferred back to the treadmill and another cell isolated.
Data analysis
All data were recorded on-line. Forces exerted against the platforms (vertical, V; mediolateral, ML; and anteroposterior, AP) and EMG data were recorded at 1 kHz while the untreated unit trace was digitized at 100 kHz for off-line discrimination using custom routines.
Analysis routines were identical to those used in a previous publication (Schepens and Drew 2004). In brief, cells were classified as showing significant increases or decreases in discharge if they exceeded ±2 SDs of the average control activity, calculated from a 500-ms period preceding the onset of the cue signal (Fig. 1). Cells showing increased activity were further classified as phasic, phasic/tonic, or tonic based on a comparison of the discharge activity in the control period, during the dynamic part of the reach [from the onset of cleidobrachialis (ClB) activity to entry of the paw in the tube], and during the static period (between 1,000 and 1,500 ms after ClB onset). Phasic cells were defined as those cells showing a significant increase during the dynamic period but in which discharge activity during the subsequent static period was <150% of that during the control period. Cells with a tonic component had a discharge rate during the static period that was >150% of the control period. Cells with a phasic/tonic discharge additionally had a discharge during the dynamic period that was >125% of that during the static period (see Schepens and Drew 2004). When classifying cell activity during the period before the onset of the GO signal (the pretrigger period), cell discharge was likewise considered to be significantly modified if it exceeded ±2 SD of the control activity.
The onset of activity in the cell discharge and in selected muscles and force traces was measured from the computer traces during individual trials and was used to determine the temporal relationships of cell activity to different behavioral events. Linear regressions between either the latency of the onset of cell discharge or the lead time (latency of ClB onset - latency of cell onset) as a function of the time of onset of the ClB were used to determine if cell discharge was better related to movement onset or to the GO signal. Cells better related to the movement show a slope of 1.0 when cell discharge is plotted as a function of ClB onset; cells better related to the GO signal show a slope of 1.0 when the lead time is plotted against the ClB onset (Chapman et al. 1986; Schepens and Drew 2003a, 2004; Vicario et al. 1983). Linear regressions were also calculated between different epochs of the cell discharge and the onset and offset of activity in different muscles and force traces.
Quantitative analysis of the relationship between cell discharge activity and the magnitude of the EMG or force activity was calculated from temporal slices. For each individual trial, both the instantaneous frequency of the cell activity and the amplitude of the EMG and force traces were integrated over consecutive 50-ms bins. A trial of 8 s duration would, therefore, yield 160 values for the cell discharge and for each of the 64 traces of analog activity. These temporal slices were repeated for each trial included in the analysis, and the linear regression analysis was performed between the cell trace and each of the analog channels. Linear regression analysis was also performed using only the changes in cell and analog activity during the period from the GO signal until the time that the paw entered the tube. As this period includes both the initial, preparatory, anticipatory postural adjustments (pAPA) and the dynamic period from the onset of the ClB until the time that the paw enters the tube, we refer to this as the pAPA + dynamic period. In this case temporal slices of 20 ms were used. Multiple regressions were compiled from the same data using the manual stepwise function in Systat (v9.0). In this case, traces were added one at a time in an order specified by the user (see RESULTS).
For all of the recorded cells, we performed spike triggered averaging (STA) (Fetz and Cheney 1979, 1980) using the computer-rectified traces from all recorded EMGs. Averages were computed using all action potentials in the entire trial (whole trial), action potentials occurring from the period after the GO signal until the end of the trial (posttrigger), and those occurring in the period prior to the GO signal (control). Averages were only retained if >1,000 action potentials were available for any one period. Responses were considered to be significant if they exceeded ±2 SD of the control activity (50 ms before the trigger action potential) for a minimum of 3 ms. The latency of the responses was determined at the point where the averaged trace crossed the 2 SD line used to determine significance.
To avoid confusion, we always refer to muscles in RESULTS with respect to the side of the body on which they were recorded, either left or right. In the DISCUSSION, we use ipsilateral with respect to the site of the recording site, in the left PMRF and not with respect to the limb performing the reaching task.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSACKNOWLEDGMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Cells (127, including 56 RSNs) were recorded during a minimum of five reaches with both the left (ipsilateral to the recording site) and the right limb. These cells form a subset of the dataset (142 cells) used in a previous publication (Schepens and Drew 2004). The location of this subset (primarily within the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis) (see Fig. 3, Schepens and Drew 2004) and the conduction velocity of the axons of these cells [97.7 ± 17.0 (SD) m.s–1, n = 54 (the latency of 2 neurons was not measured)] was almost identical to that of the full dataset (98.1 ± 16.7 m.s-1). Because our previous analysis (Schepens and Drew 2004) showed no major differences in the discharge characteristics of the RSNs and the unidentified cells, they are treated together in this manuscript. Sixty seven (67/127) neurons (including 36 RSNs) showed increased activity prior to the onset of the ipsilateral ClB (iClB) muscle during the left reach; these cells discharging in advance of the prime flexor muscles responsible for the reach will form the major focus of this manuscript.
General task characteristics
Reaching movements of the forelimb are characterized by stereotypical changes in ground reaction forces (GRFs) and EMG activity in all four limbs (Schepens and Drew 2003a). Figure 2 illustrates some of the more prominent and pertinent changes. The initial changes during reach of the left forelimb (ipsilateral to the recording site), are observed as an increase in activity in the left lateral head of triceps (lTriL) and in FV under the left limb (lFLV) together with a decrease in activity in the right TriL and in FV under the right limb (Fig. 2, left; see also Fig. 3). These anticipatory postural adjustments preceding the movement itself are thought to serve to displace the center of mass into the triangle created by the three supporting limbs (Ioffé et al. 1982; Schepens and Drew 2003a). These pAPAs are followed by a large increase in the level of activity of shoulder protractors (e.g., ClB) and elbow flexor muscles that begin shortly before the limb is lifted from the ground and continue throughout the reach, together with a large increase in FV under the right supporting forelimb and a decrease in FV in the reaching limb. There is also increased activity in the left vastus lateralis (VL) and in FV under the left hindlimb and decreases in activity in the right VL and in FV under the right hindlimb. These postural adjustments accompanying the movement (aAPAs) are also anticipatory in nature in that the latency of activation is coincident with the onset of the activity in the prime movers, such as the ClB (Alstermark and Wessberg 1985; Schepens and Drew 2003a). During movements of the right forelimb, the changes in GRF are the exact reciprocal of those observed during movement of the left limb (Fig. 2, right).
The activity patterns in the major extensor muscles of the forelimbs were also reciprocal during left and right reaches. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 but is clearer in Fig. 3A. During left reach (thicker line) the lTriL showed an initial, phasic, increase in activity that occurred just prior to the pAPA and that was time locked to the GO signal and a second, brief, burst of activity that was time locked to the onset of movement (see Schepens and Drew 2003a for a detailed examination of the temporal relationships of different muscles to the major events occurring during the reach). This second period of activity terminated at approximately the time that the limb reached the target and the paw was inserted into the tube. In contrast, during a right reach (thinner lines), this muscle showed an initial decrease in activity followed by a sustained increase as the weight of the animal was transferred to the left side. This pattern of activity was observed in the other extensors of the forelimbs that we recorded, namely the palmaris longus (PaL) and the supraspinatus (SSp) (not illustrated). The forelimb flexor muscles became strongly active subsequent to the pAPA and just before the limb was lifted from the platform. In the brachialis (Br) muscle, which is a pure flexor of the elbow, there was a sharp peak of activity that was followed by a lower level of sustained activity throughout the reach (Fig. 3B). During movements of the right limb, there was a very low level of activity that was sustained throughout the movement. A similar pattern of activity was observed in the shoulder retractor, the teres major (TrM) as well as in the wrist dorsiflexor, the extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The shoulder protractors, the ClB and the cleidotrapezius (ClT), also exhibited a similar pattern of activity with the exception that in these muscles there was one large burst that was maintained throughout the movement (see e.g., Fig. 2). The onset of activity in all of these flexor muscles was tightly linked to the onset of the movement (Schepens and Drew 2003a). The activity patterns in the shoulder muscles were more heterogeneous, but all of them showed reciprocal changes in activity during the pAPA. As for the triceps muscle, the acromiotrapezius (AcT; Fig. 3C) and the spinodeltoideus (SpD; Fig. 3D) muscles showed an increase in activity during the pAPA during the left reach and a reciprocal decrease in activity during the right reach. During the reaching movement, the AcT also showed a similar pattern to the TriL although the level of activity during the left reach was maintained at a relatively higher level. This was even more the case in the SpD in which there was as high, or higher, a level of activity during the right reach as during the left reach. In other words, while this muscle showed a reciprocal pattern of activity during the pAPA, it showed a similar pattern during the latter part of the reach. A similar pattern of activity was also seen in the acromiodeltoideus.
As for the forelimb extensor muscles, the major hindlimb extensor muscles, such as the gastrocnemius (GL; Fig. 3E), also showed clear reciprocal patterns of activity. During the left reach, the level of EMG activity increased and during the right reach it decreased. A similar pattern was seen in the VL (see Fig. 2) and in the gluteus medius (GlM). This pattern of activity reflects the diagonal pattern of support that is observed as the weight of the cat is transferred onto the contralateral forelimb and the hindlimb diagonal to the supporting forelimb. Activity patterns in the hindlimb flexor muscles were more variable although they were generally reciprocal to the activity patterns observed in the hindlimb extensors. As illustrated in Fig. 3F, the semitendinosus (St) on the left side was generally inactive during the left reach but increased during a right reach when the left hindlimb was unloaded. The sartorius (Srt) showed a similar pattern of activity, although during the left reach, the tonic activity present in this muscle during standing was frequently inhibited.
Last, in the axial muscles, the averaged pattern of activity was frequently similar throughout the reach for both left and right reaches. In the biventer cervicus (BvC), there was an initial short-latency decrease in activity and then a prolonged increase in activity. Both of these periods of activity were temporally related to the GO signal. Similar patterns of activity were observed in the splenius (Spl) and the complexus (Com). The longissimus dorsi (LoD) muscle generally showed greater activity during the right, contralateral, reach. It was also quite noticeable that the activity patterns of these axial muscles were very variable on a trial-by-trial basis (and even from one average to another) and in many trials lacked any evidence of phasic activity at all. Such was not the case for the limb and shoulder muscles which showed a much more consistent pattern of activity.
General cell characteristics
Despite the clear reciprocal nature of the vertical forces and the EMG activity of many of the major extensor and flexor muscles, most of the reticular neurons that we recorded showed broadly similar patterns of activity during reaches of both the left (ipsilateral to the recording site) and the right (contralateral) forelimb. Indeed, all except 4/67 neurons showed increases in activity during both the left and right reaches. Figure 2 shows one example of a tonically discharging neuron and Fig. 4 shows four other examples, one of which discharged in a tonic pattern (R22T32A), one in a phasic/tonic pattern (R22T30C) and two phasically. In each of these examples, the cells discharged with the same pattern of activity during the right reach and either with similar or elevated discharge frequencies.
Of the 20 cells that discharged phasically (see METHODS) (see also Schepens and Drew 2004) during the reach of the left, ipsilateral, forelimb, 15/20 also discharged phasically during the reach of the right, contralateral forelimb (see examples in Fig. 4), 3 further cells showed slightly elevated increases of activity in the static phase of the movement causing their classification to change to phasic/tonic and only 2 cells showed a reciprocal decrease during the contralateral forelimb reach (Table 1). Among those cells classified as discharging in a phasic/tonic manner during the left reach there was slightly more change. Eighteen (18/37) discharged in a similar manner during the left and right reach, whereas a further 10 showed a reduction in the ratio between the phasic and tonic components that resulted in a reclassification as tonic cells. Five other cells showed a reduction in the tonic component so that they were now classified as discharging in a purely phasic manner during the right reach. Among the cells classified as discharging in a tonic manner during the left reach, 4/10 showed an identical pattern of discharge during the right reach and 6/10 were reclassified as discharging in a phasic/tonic manner. Despite these changes, it should be emphasized that, overall, 38/47 (81%) of those cells discharging with a tonic component (phasic/tonic and tonic cells) during the left reach continued to discharge with a tonic component during the right reach. The changes in classification during the left and right reach support our previous statement (Schepens and Drew 2004) that the cell discharge patterns form a continuum, from those cells discharging in a purely phasic fashion to those discharging in a purely tonic pattern, but with the majority of cells showing both a phasic and a tonic component.
|
Temporal relationships of discharge activity during reach
As we previously emphasized (Schepens and Drew 2004), during a reach with the left limb, the onset of the discharge activity of neurons in the PMRF may be time locked either to the GO signal or to the onset of the prime flexor muscles, the Br and the ClB. We have proposed that cells the discharge of which is time locked to the GO signal contribute to the initiation of the pAPA. Cells with a discharge activity that is time -locked to the onset of the flexor muscles are suggested to contribute to the initiation of the movement and the accompanying postural adjustments (aAPAs). In many cells, we saw evidence of both relationships, and most cells also continued to discharge throughout the dynamic phase of the movement with many continuing to discharge throughout the entire movement, until the reaching limb was replaced on the support surface.
Some of these characteristics changed during reaching with the right (contralateral) limb, whereas others remained the same. In the following sections we therefore address separately the temporal relationships of the different features of the cell discharge, both to the onset of the movement, as well as to later aspects, such as the termination of the dynamic phase of the reach. Moreover, because our initial analyses showed that most of the important features of the discharge activity during right as compared with left reaches were observed in cells of all three types, phasic, phasic/tonic, and tonic, we will present results from these cells together, emphasizing differences where apparent.
Discharge activity related to the GO signal
Initial changes in discharge activity that were time locked to the GO signal could occur as either a decrease in activity (observed only in cells with a tonic discharge prior to the GO signal) or as an increase in activity. Eleven neurons exhibited a decrease in activity during the left reach that was time-locked to THE go signal. During the right reach, all 11 of these cells showed a reciprocal pattern of activity, in this initial period of activity, in that they now exhibited an increased period of activity, equally time locked to the GO signal.
An example of one such cell is illustrated in Fig. 6A. During the left reach, the neuron showed a clear decrease in the level of activity that occurred at a fixed time after the GO signal. This decrease in activity was clearly time locked to the GO signal as illustrated by the graph of Fig. 6B (left), which illustrates the linear relationship between lead time and the onset of activity in the lClB (
). During the reach of the right limb, contralateral to the recording site, the initial change in the discharge of the cell was a short-latency increase in the activity (Fig. 6A, right). As illustrated in the graph of Fig. 6B (right), there was a significant, linear relationship between the lead time of the cell discharge and the onset of activity in the rClB. Two other examples of neurons showing similar reciprocal changes in the early period of the discharge activity are illustrated in Fig. 6C.
The relationship between lead time and the onset of activity in the ClB for all trials from the nine cells in which the early discharge could be accurately measured during both left and right reaches is plotted in Fig. 6D. As for the example of Fig. 6, A and B, the population data show a clear relationship to the GO signal for both the left and right reach. The value of the intercepts for the population data were 57 ms for the left limb and 50 ms for the right limb.
During left reaches, we previously reported (Schepens and Drew 2004) that, after the initial decrease in activity, some of these cells (8/11) showed subsequent increases in activity that were also time locked to the GO signal. Such is the case, for example, for the increase in activity following the initial decrease in activity during the left reach for the cell illustrated in Fig. 6A. We referred to these as secondary increases. This distinction is not pertinent during the reach with the right limb because the initial change was a short-latency increase in activity. Any secondary increase, if present, is, therefore not easily detectable in the individual trials. This is the case for the cell in Fig. 6A, although the averaged activity in the PEH suggests that such a secondary increase might occur.
In contrast to the cell illustrated in Fig. 6, the example neuron illustrated in Fig. 7 showed a nonreciprocal pattern of activation during the earliest part of the discharge. During the left reach, Fig. 7, A and B, left, there was a short-latency increase in cell discharge activity that was time locked to the GO signal. During reaches made with the right, contralateral, limb, this cell discharged in an identical manner (Fig. 7, A and B, right). This relationship was similar in all 10 cells for which latencies could be measured during both left and right reaches (Fig. 7, C and D).
A similar pattern of nonreciprocal activity was also observed in many of the neurons discharging phasically. Figure 8, A and B, illustrates one example in which the discharge was time locked to the GO signal during the left and right reach in the same manner as for the more tonically discharging cells illustrated in Fig. 7. In the illustrated example, as in many of the other phasically discharging cells, the neuron showed a short-latency increase in discharge that preceded, and that was maximal during, the pAPA (gray bar). Increases in activity that were significantly related to the GO signal during both left and right reach could be measured in four other cells (see e.g., Fig. 8C), and the relationship of this small population to the GO signal was homogenous (Fig. 8D) and similar to that observed for the single cell illustrated in Fig. 8B.
Discharge activity related to the movement onset
During the left reach, the initial increase in activity in 16 neurons with a phasic/tonic or tonic discharge, and in 3 neurons with a phasic discharge, was significantly related to the onset of the lClB onset, and therefore the movement (Schepens and Drew 2003a). During the right reach, only 1/19 of these cells showed a similar, significant, relationship between the initial increase in activity and lClB. Indeed, in 11/19 cells, the initial increase in activity during the right reach was significantly related to the GO signal. Although this change in temporal linkage might suggest a change in function, it should be emphasized that the comparison is complicated by the reciprocal nature of the initial change in cell discharge of the type illustrated in Fig. 6. Although a movement-related increase can be readily determined in a cell that shows an initial decrease in cell activity (the situation during the left reach), it can only with great difficulty be detected after an initial GO-related increase (the situation during the right reach). In other words, the time of onset of the movement-related activity during the right reach could be masked by the preceding GO-related activity.
Discharge activity related to other events during the movement
Many of the phasic/tonic cells showed a pronounced phasic phase of activity during the right reach that, as illustrated in Fig. 9B, was frequently followed by a clear depression of the discharge. This decrease in the discharge was clearly better related to the movement as it was only evident when the cell discharge was synchronized to the onset of the rClB (compare Figs. 6A, right, with 9B). Synchronizing the discharge on the lClB also revealed a similar but smaller depression during the reach made with the left limb (Fig. 9A). Linear regression analysis confirmed the relationship between the end of the period of cell discharge and several different movement-related events. For example, during both the left (Fig. 9C) and right (D) reach, the end of the phasic period of activity was significantly related to the end of the period of activity in the major muscles active during the reach, e.g., the Br (not illustrated) and the TrM. This decrease in activity also correlated with the transient decrease in force seen in the supporting limb (FV unloading) at this same time. In addition, there was also a significant relationship with the second period of phasic activity in the AcT, the end of the phasic period of activity in the back muscle, LoD, as well as with the period of activity of several other muscles (not illustrated). This underlines the close relationship in the postural changes in different groups of muscles with quite different anatomical functions.
Similar relationships between the end of the period of phasic cell discharge and the termination of the phasic period of activity in different muscle groups were found in many cells. These relationships are shown in Fig. 9, E and F, for all of those cells with a tonic component (solid lines) in which the relationship between the end of the phasic discharge and the end of the period of activity in the Br (or the TrM; see legend) was significant (P < 0.05). The slope of most of these regressions approached 1.0 and most had an intercept that was close to 0; this was more evident for the relationships during right reach than during the left reach. Similar relationships were found for 5/6 of the cells discharging with a phasic pattern of activity during the left and right reach and for which the offset of cell discharge could be measured in individual trials (dotted lines). The homogeneity of these responses is illustrated by the scatterplots in Fig. 9, E and F, which show the data from individual trials in 23 cells.
Pretrigger activity
Cell discharge frequency in some cells increased prior to the onset of the GO signal (Schepens and Drew 2004). This pretrigger activity was related to the changes in the level of the EMG activity that occurred following the appearance of the cue. The traces of weight distribution during the reach show that, during both left and right reaches, there was a shift of the weight forward over the forelimbs (see Figs. 10, A and B) and that this shift in weight generally started following the cue tone (open circles) but prior to the GO signal. The mediolateral traces on the other hand showed a reciprocal change in activity with the weight being shifted over the right limbs during the left reach and over the left limb during the right reach. Again, there was sometimes a similar change in weight distribution after the cue onset in the pretrigger period as seen in Fig. 10, A and B.
In the example illustrated in Fig. 10, A and B, the cell showed a qualitatively similar and significant (see METHODS) increase in activity before the GO signal during both the left and right reach. Concomitantly, there was an increase in the activity of the lAcT during both reaches and a forward shift of the weight distribution in both cases. There was also symmetrical increases in activity in several other muscles, such as the rAcT, the lTrM and the rTrM (not illustrated). As indicated in the preceding paragraph, the changes in the mediolateral weight distribution were reciprocal. Linear regression analyses between cell activity and each of the 64 EMG and force traces that were measured showed the highest coefficient of determination for the lAcT muscle during both the left and right reaches (Fig. 10, C and D). These relationships were substantially higher than those made using the change in the AP weight distribution of the cat.
Altogether, 11/67 cells showed significant increases in activity prior to the GO signal during both the left and the right reaches. In 8/11 cells, the best correlations with the cell discharge frequency during the pretrigger period were found with one of the muscles acting around the shoulder, either the AcT or the TrM. In addition, there were also slightly less high correlations with the activity in the Srt in 5/11 cells. Those cells showing strong linear relationships were also those that showed the largest changes in activity during the pretrigger period as a percentage of the control activity. In some cases, increases in activity in the shoulder muscles in the pretrigger period were as clear as those illustrated in Fig. 10. In 9/11 of these cells, the initial change in discharge activity following the GO signal was a short-latency increase in discharge activity during both the left and right reach. As such most of these cells would be classified as discharging in a nonreciprocal fashion, similar to those in Fig. 7, although in only two of these cells was it possible to measure the latency of the cell discharge.
Another 10/67 cells showed increased activity in the pretrigger period during the left reach but no significant change during the right reach. In 6/10 of these cells, there was no indication of any change in the weight distribution in the AP direction during the right reach. As such, the lack of any change during the right reach may simply reflect the fact that the cat made adjustments to its posture in the pretrigger period only during the left reach. In the other 4/10 cells, there were clear changes in posture during the pretrigger period during the right reach. All four of these cells showed an initial reciprocal pattern of discharge activity after the GO signal, similar to the example in Fig. 6.
A further 4/67 cells showed decreased activity during the pretrigger period during both the left and right reach. No consistent relationships were observed between cells discharge activity and EMG or force activity in these cells, although there was a tendency for decreased muscle tone in the BvC during the pretrigger period.
Quantitative relationships
We determined detailed relationships between cell discharge frequency and the magnitude of the EMG activity for that subset of neurons with a tonic component for which we were able to measure temporal relationships (27/47) as well as for 12/15 neurons that discharged phasically during both the left and right reach.
Because of the close relationships between changes in activity in different muscles, high coefficients of determination (R2) were found for multiple muscles during the left reach, although the correlation with the change in the rTriL was consistently high for muscles with a static component in their discharge (see Fig. 13 in Schepens and Drew 2004). During the right reach, this relationship was lost, and the correlations were much reduced. This is illustrated in Fig. 11A (2nd from left) by plotting R2 for the population of cells showing a tonic component during the left and right reach. All of the lines joining the coefficients of determination for the left and right reach are negative illustrating the greater, positive, relationship during the left reach. The opposite pattern was seen for the lTriL, i.e., correlations were negative during the left reach and positive during the right reach (Fig. 11A, left). Similar relationships during left and right reach were observed for the AcT and the SSp (not illustrated), and a reciprocal relationship was observed in the VL (i.e., positive responses in the lVL during left reach and in the rVL during the right reach, not illustrated). Relationships in the forelimb and hindlimb flexors as well as in axial muscles were weaker and more variable. From the point of view of the change on overall body posture, there was a positive relationship between cell discharge and the shift of the weight to one or the other side during the left and right reaches, respectively; in contrast, there was only a weak relationship to the forward shift of the body during the reach (Fig. 11A).
Figure 11B that these relationships were maintained when considering only the level of activity during the time from the GO signal until the time that the paw entered the tube (pAPA + dynamic), although the relationships were frequently weaker. In addition, the nonreciprocal cells (blue lines) showed a poor relationship with the rTriL during the left reach. This is primarily explained by the fact that the rTril shows an initial decrease in activity, followed by an increase, whereas the cell shows only an increase (Fig. 7). The population of cells with a purely phasic pattern of discharge during the left and right movements (Fig. 11C) showed some major differences in comparison with the population with a tonic component. In particular, the relationship between cell discharge frequency and the level of activity in the rTriL, and that with the lateral shift in body weight, was the reverse of that observed in the phasic/tonic and tonic cells.
Not only did cells show high correlation coefficients with multiple muscles, but there was a relationship between the strength of the relationship with different muscles. This is illustrated in Fig. 11D for three pairs of muscles as well as for the measures of the center of vertical pressure. When a cell showed a strong positive relationship with the rTriL, it normally showed a strong negative relationship with the lTriL (Fig. 11D, left). Similarly a strong positive relationship with the rTriL was associated with a strong positive relationship in the diagonally located lVL, and there was also a positive relationship between the left and right ClB. There was no relationship between the strength of the correlation with the forward and lateral shift of weight, suggesting independent control of these two behavioral events. Good relationships were also observed between lBvC and rBvC but not between the lBvC and the rTriL (not illustrated).
Because of the widespread anatomical branching of many reticulospinal axons (see Introduction), we considered the possibility that better relationships between cell discharge and EMG activity might be obtained by examining multiple muscles. To test this, we performed a multiple regression in which we added muscles in a stepwise fashion based on the results from the linear regression analyses and on considerations of the goal of the behavior. During the left reach, the rTriL was the first muscle entered as it was most frequently among the muscles showing the best relationship to cell activity in the linear regression analysis (Fig. 11A). The lClB in the left limb (the one performing the reach) was added subsequently, followed by the rAcT because it was active during both the dynamic and static phases and also produced high correlation coefficients in the linear regression analysis for many cells (not illustrated). Subsequently, we added the complementary muscles in the left forelimb, the Srt and the VL, as representative muscles for the hindlimbs, and finally we added representative axial muscles. For the right reach, the muscles were added in the reverse order.
Figure 12A shows the results of this analysis for all of those cells showing a reciprocal pattern of activity (red lines) in the period immediately after the GO signal (see e.g., Fig. 6) as well as for those showing a nonreciprocal pattern of activity (blue lines) similar to that illustrated in Fig. 7. In general, during the left reach, the reciprocal cells showed an increase in the value of R2 when the lClB and the rAcT were added to the regression. Subsequently, however, the addition of further muscles produced very little further change in the value of R2. During the right reach (Fig. 12D), two differences were observed. First, the overall value of the regression was lower during the reach of the contralateral limb than during the left reach, that is, the regression explained less of the variance in this condition. Second, although there was an increase in the value of R2 as the other forelimb muscles were added, as for the left reach, there was an additional increase in several cells as the left (contralateral) Srt was added to the equation.
The overall change in the value of R2 is summarized for the reciprocal cells in the population averages of Fig. 12B. The black triangles indicate the cumulative value of R2 as each muscle in turn was added to the equation showing that, on average, 
60% of the variance in the behavior during the left reach could be explained by combining the activity in the first 4 muscles. During the right reach, the same population of cells explained <40% of the variance for the equivalent four muscles and only attained 40% after adding representative muscles from all four limbs as well as axial muscles. The gray circles in the plots of Fig. 12B indicate the correlations obtained when using only the data from the dynamic period of the reach, whereas the green squares indicate the correlations obtained during the static period of the reach. These data show that the cells with a reciprocal pattern of activity are much better correlated during the dynamic part of the reach than during the static portion when activity in the muscles is primarily confined to the extensors of the supporting limbs.
The pattern of correlations obtained from the nonreciprocal cells (blue lines) was somewhat different from that observed in the neurons showing a reciprocal pattern of activity. In particular, these cells showed a much more variable pattern of correlation than did the reciprocal neurons for both the left and right reaches, suggesting that they form a less homogenous population. As a result, the cumulative values of R2 observed in the population average of the activity during the left reach (Fig. 12C) are substantially lower from those observed for the reciprocal population. Moreover, Fig. 12, A and C, shows that the strength of the correlations is relatively similar for both the left and the right reaches. Interestingly, for the left reach, the strength of the correlations during the static period of the behavior is almost equal to that observed during the dynamic period and the overall behavior. This is in part because of an increased strength of correlation during the static period and in part to a decreased correlation during the dynamic period.
Other cells with a tonic discharge showed results similar to those for the reciprocal group with higher values of R2 for left reaches than for right reaches (not illustrated).
Causal relationships
Spike-triggered averaging (STA) was used to examine causality in all 67 cells forming the major database. For this analysis, we used all action potential from all trials from the whole trial. Only cells for which we recorded >1,000 spikes were included in the final analysis. Overall, this yielded results for a total of 50 cells during the left, ipsilateral, reach and for 49 cells during the right, contralateral, reach. In both cats, EMG electrodes were implanted into 24 muscles, although some electrodes were lost over time.
Postspike facilitation (PSF) or depression (PSD) was observed in a total of 16 muscles from 21/50 cells during the left reach and in 44 muscles from 17/49 cells during the right reach. In most muscles, 49/60 (82%), PSD was observed. An example of the most typical responses that were observed is illustrated in Fig. 13 for the cell illustrated in Figs. 6A and 9. In this cell, STA using a total of 11,537 action potentials recorded during the left reach showed no signs of PSF or PSD in any of the 24 muscles recorded during this experiment. In contrast, STA during the right reach, using 8,924 action potentials showed significant PSD in four proximal muscles, the lAcT, lSSp, lTrM, and the lTriL (Fig. 13B); there was additionally PSD in the lPaL (not illustrated). In other words, these responses were observed in the extensors of the supporting limb, ipsilateral to the recording site but contralateral to the reaching limb. These responses were equally seen from averages made using action potentials only occurring prior to the onset of the GO signal (control, Fig. 13C) and from those occurring only after the GO signal (Fig. 13D). Similar responses were, of course, observed in the control period preceding the movements of the left limb. The validity of the responses is shown by Fig. 13E, which shows the similarity in the PSDs obtained from compiling STAs from successive groups of eight trials during the right, contralateral, reach. The fact that STA was observed in the control period, prior to the GO signal, but was observed only during movements with the right, contralateral, limb suggests that there must be some modulation, or gating, of the synaptic efficacy during the left reach.
Almost identical responses were obtained from seven other cells; two examples are shown in Fig. 14A. In both of these cells, STA using action potentials from the complete trial showed a clear postspike depression of activity in the lAcT and the lSSp during the right reach but no significant effects during the left reach. There was also depression of the activity in the lTrM, lTriL, lPaL, and lGlM in the cell illustrated in Fig. 14A and of the lTrM of the cell illustrated in Fig. 14B (not illustrated). As for the cell illustrated in Fig. 13, there was clear evidence of postspike depression in the control period, before the GO signal, for both the left and the right reach despite the small number of action potentials available to construct the average. Similar modulation of the responses were seen in the other 5/7 cells showing this pattern of response. All of the cells displaying strong PSD in the left forelimb muscles during the right reach showed a phasic/tonic discharge during both the left and the right reach. Moreover 6/8 were also identified antidromically from the electrodes in the lumbar spinal cord showing that these were neurons capable of influencing both the fore- and hindlimbs.
The other common pattern of responses, observed in six cells (including 5 identified as RSNS by the electrodes in the lumbar spinal cord) during left reach, was a clear depression of activity in the hindlimb extensors (GL, VL, GlM) of the left limb and a small, but significant, facilitation of the activity in the lSrt. In 3/6 cells (all identified by stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord), there was facilitation of the lSrt and depression of the lGL and lGlM during both the left and right reach. One such example is illustrated in Fig. 14C. Note that the PSD in the lGlM is also visible in the control condition, at least for those trials in which the cat is instructed to make a right reach. In four cells, there was a depression of activity in the lTriL during left reach and in three cells, a facilitation of the activity in the rTriL during the right reach. Changes in activity in the BvC were seen in three cells and changes in LoD were seen in 3 different cells.
For the forelimb muscles, the average latency was 8.8 ± 2.4 ms (n = 43), and for the hindlimb muscles, it was 10.7 ± 3.2 ms (n = 17). We saw no evidence that cells producing postspike responses were preferentially localized in any one region of the PMRF.
Other cell types
In addition to those 67 cells that increased their discharge activity prior to the onset of the iClB activity, we also recorded 60 other reticular neurons during both the left and right reach. During the left reach, 14 cells showed decreased activity after the GO signal, 13 cells an increase in activity subsequent to the onset of the iClB, and 10 showed a mix of these two characteristics; a further 11 neurons showed no significant change in activity or were silent (Schepens and Drew 2004). During the right reach, 38/48 (79%) showed very similar patterns of activity to those observed during the left reach. For another 8/10 neurons, the major difference was the appearance of a significant increase in discharge after the GO signal (Fig. 15), similar to that illustrated in Fig. 6.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTION |
|---|
), tonic cells; (
), phasic/tonic cells. Cells illustrated in 
