JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 96: 2963-2971, 2006. First published September 6, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00716.2006
0022-3077/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/2963    most recent
00716.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grafe, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lang, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grafe, P.

Activity-Dependent Modulation of Axonal Excitability in Unmyelinated Peripheral Rat Nerve Fibers by the 5-HT(3) Serotonin Receptor

Philip M. Lang2,*, Gila Moalem-Taylor3,*, David J. Tracey3, Hugh Bostock4 and Peter Grafe1

1Departments of Physiology and 2Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany; 3School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and 4Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College, London, United Kingdom

Submitted 13 July 2006; accepted in final form 1 September 2006


 ABSTRACT
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Activity-dependent fluctuations in axonal excitability and changes in interspike intervals modify the conduction of trains of action potentials in unmyelinated peripheral nerve fibers. During inflammation of a nerve trunk, long stretches of axons are exposed to inflammatory mediators such as 5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]. In the present study, we have tested the effects of m-chlorophenylbiguanide (mCPBG), an agonist at the 5-HT(3) serotonin receptor, on activity- and potential-dependent variations in membrane threshold and conduction velocity of unmyelinated C-fiber axons of isolated rat sural nerve segments. The increase in axonal excitability during application of mCPBG was much stronger at higher frequencies of action potentials and/or during axonal membrane hyperpolarization. The effects on the postspike recovery cycle also depended on the rate of stimulation. At an action potential frequency of 1 Hz or in hyperpolarized axons, mCPBG produced a loss of superexcitability. In contrast, at 0.33 Hz, a small increase in the postspike subexcitability was observed. Similar effects on excitability changes were found when latency instead of threshold was recorded, but only at higher action potential frequencies: at 1.8 Hz, mCPBG increased conduction velocity and reduced postspike supernormality. The latter effect would increase the interspike interval if pairs of action potentials were conducted along several cm in an inflamed nerve trunk. These data indicate that activation of axonal 5-HT(3) receptors not only enhances membrane excitability but also modulates action potential trains in unmyelinated, including nociceptive, nerve fibers at high impulse rates.


 INTRODUCTION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Action potentials in human nociceptive nerve fibers have been studied in detail by microneurography (Handwerker 1996Go). One key conclusion made by using this technique is that the conscious sensation of pain arises as the result of a series rather than of a single nerve action potential. For example, CO2 laser stimuli were perceived as painful only when the spike trains in nociceptive units lasted for >60 ms (Bromm et al. 1984Go). In this study of Bromm and colleagues, interspike intervals in the trains of impulses had a minimum at ~25 ms, corresponding to a maximum instantaneous frequency of 40 Hz. In another publication (Olausson 1998aGo), interburst spike frequencies of ≤50 Hz were found. An interesting question is whether the characteristics of interspike intervals in nociceptive afferent nerve fibers are altered by inflammatory mediators. There are very few observations regarding this issue. For example, hyperalgesia to heat in inflamed human skin was accompanied by a significant prolongation of interspike intervals in unmyelinated (C-fiber) afferents (Olausson 1998bGo).

In recent studies, the sequence of changes of axonal excitability after an action potential (i.e., the recovery cycle) have been analyzed in much detail (Bostock et al. 2003Go; Gee et al. 1996Go; Shin and Raymond 1991Go; Weidner et al. 2000Go, 2002Go). The recovery cycle can last for several hundred milliseconds and consists of periods with enhanced and reduced axonal excitability. It has been found that this postspike excitability cycle varies with the frequency of stimulation and may result in temporal dispersion or narrowing of trains of impulses (Bostock et al. 2003Go; Weidner et al. 2002Go). For example, pairs of action potentials produced by electrical stimulation at the foot with a repetition rate of 1 Hz show a reduction of the interspike interval from 50 to ~11 ms when they reach the peroneal nerve dorsolateral to the fibular head (Weidner et al. 2002Go).

Vasculitis, herpes zoster infection, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy are examples for human neuropathies accompanied by intense inflammation along long segments of the affected nerve (Sommer 2001Go). Also, long stretches of unmyelinated axons are exposed to chemical mediators in the neighborhood of injured, degenerating nerve fibers and in ischemic limbs. It is well documented that inflammatory mediators enhance the excitability of unmyelinated axons in isolated segments of rat and human sural nerves (Irnich et al. 2002Go; Lang et al. 2002Go; Moalem et al. 2005Go). However, it is also possible that these compounds may alter the interspike interval in trains of action potentials. This effect may produce functionally important modifications of the stimulus characteristics during action potential propagation, which may modify the perception of pain. In the present study, we have tested whether the recovery cycle in C-fibers is modulated by the subtype 3 of the 5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT(3)] serotonin receptor. 5-HT(3) is an important component in the group of inflammatory mediators (Dray 1995Go; Moalem and Tracey 2006Go) and contributes to peripheral sensitization and hyperalgesia in inflammation and nerve injury (Michaelis et al. 1998Go; Sommer 2004Go). After genetic or pharmacological disruption of the 5-HT(3) receptor, persistent, but not acute nociception induced by tissue injury, is significantly reduced (Zeitz et al. 2002Go). Furthermore, mice deficient for the serotonin transporter did not develop thermal hyperalgesia after chronic constrictive sciatic nerve injury (Vogel et al. 2003Go).

The excitability of unmyelinated axons in isolated short segments of peripheral mammalian nerve can be measured with high sensitivity by means of a computer-controlled threshold tracking method originally written for studies of human nerves in vivo (Bostock et al. 1998Go; Burke et al. 2001Go). Previously, this method was used to follow changes in membrane excitability during application of a variety of neuroligands including mediators involved in inflammatory and neuropathic pain (Irnich et al. 2002Go; Lang et al. 2003Go; Moalem et al. 2005Go). In the present study, we have applied the threshold tracking method to study the changes in excitability that occur in the recovery period after single action potentials in peripheral C-fibers. These recordings of the postspike excitability cycle are supplemented by measurements of latency shifts in the recovery period. We demonstrate that activation of the ionotropic 5-HT(3) receptor by m-chlorophenylbiguanide (mCPBG) alters the postspike recovery cycle and causes activity- and potential-dependent neuromodulation of axonal excitability. We also describe that mCPBG has frequency-dependent effects on changes in C-fiber conduction velocity. One of the consequences of these alterations is that interspike intervals will be prolonged when pairs of action potentials are conducted along several cm of unmyelinated axons in a nerve trunk with raised extracellular concentration of serotonin. This might be functionally significant in neuropathies or nerve injuries accompanied by inflammation along the nerve trunk.


 METHODS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and preparation

Adult Wistar rats, weighing 250–350 g (University of Munich or Biological Resources Center, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia), were used in the experiments. All procedures were approved by federal law (Germany) or by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the University of New South Wales. Sural nerves were removed from Wistar rats that were either deeply anesthetized and subsequently killed with an overdose of sodium pentobarbitone (120 mg/kg ip; Sydney) or from rats after death due to asphyxiation in a chamber filled with carbon dioxide gas (Munich). The isolated nerves were immediately put into fresh artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) solution containing (in mM) 117 NaCl, 3.6 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 11 D-glucose; pH 7.4 (bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2). The nerves were desheathed under a microscope and then held at each end by suction electrodes in an organ bath. One suction electrode was used to elicit action potentials, while the other was used as a recording electrode. The distance between stimulating and recording electrodes was ~3.7 mm. The organ bath (volume: about 1 ml) was continuously perfused with ACSF solution at a flow rate of 8 ml/min and a temperature of 30°C. All chemicals, including mCPBG, were purchased from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany).

Electrophysiological recordings

Axonal excitability parameters and latency recordings were performed using the QTRAC program (Institute of Neurology, London, UK). QTRAC is a flexible, stimulus-response data-acquisition program, originally written for studies of human nerves in vivo (Bostock et al. 1998Go) but also suitable for electrophysiological recordings from isolated peripheral nerves. In the present study, QTRAC was used to record compound action potentials (CAPs) from peripheral C-fibers, to generate stimuli, and to display the results. The isolated segments of sural nerves were stimulated with a linear stimulus isolator (A395, WPI, Sarasota, FL) with a maximal output of 1 mA. The stimulator was controlled by a computer via a data-acquisition board. Nerve excitability and latency were tested with 1-ms current pulses at different frequencies. For threshold tracking experiments, the stimulus strength was automatically adjusted to maintain the C-fiber CAP at a constant amplitude (40% of the maximum, defined as "threshold"). In latency recordings, CAPs of maximal amplitude were used. Because axons being tracked at threshold are excited on average by 50% of the test stimuli, the effective stimulation rate for threshold-tracking experiments was calculated as the number of supramaximal stimuli plus half the number of test stimuli per repeat stimulation sequence, divided by the length of the sequence in seconds. In a typical stimulation sequence, successive sweeps delivered every 1 or 3 s contained: a supramaximal stimulus (to monitor peak response amplitude), a test stimulus alone, and a supramaximal conditioning stimulus + test stimulus. This sequence resulted in a mean stimulation rate for axons at threshold of 1 + 1/2 +11/2 stimuli every 3 or 9 s (1 or 0.33 Hz). In the case of a five-channel protocol (see GoGoFig. 3), 1 + 1/2 +1 1/2 + 1/2 +1 1/2 stimuli were given every 5 or 15 s (1 or 0.33 Hz).


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Threshold changes in the postspike recovery period depend on stimulus rate. A: representative response waveforms for the 3 stimulus conditions (channels of the QTRAC program) used. Channel 1 determined the response to a supramaximal stimulus, channel 2 tracked the "threshold" current required to evoke a response 40% of maximal, while channel 3 determined the effect of a supramaximal conditioning stimulus on this threshold current. B: increase in the stimulation frequency from 0.33 to 1 Hz results in an increase of the threshold current for the test response. The modification of threshold produced by the conditioning action potential at an interval of 25 ms changes from subexcitability to superexcitability during the period of higher action potential frequency. C: recovery cycle of excitability depends on stimulation frequency. Changes in threshold produced by a conditioning stimulus at several interspike intervals are plotted for the low (0.33 Hz) and the high (1 Hz) stimulus rate (mean ± SD).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT(3)] receptors on unmyelinated axons in isolated rat sural nerve segments enhances membrane excitability. A: 3 stimulus channels were used to track threshold without (channel 2) and with (channel 3) a conditioning impulse, as in Fig. 1. Top right: representative example of the compound action potentials. B: continuous recording of threshold current (channel 2) and threshold current 30 ms after an action potential (channel 3) during application of mCPBG (3 µM) to the bathing solution. Note the decrease in threshold produced by mCPBG at a stimulation rate of 1 Hz is accompanied by a complete loss of superexcitability. In contrast, only a small reduction of threshold current and a slight increase in subexcitability was seen when mCPBG was tested at 0.33 Hz. The time points indicated by * indicate threshold tracking periods without a conditioning stimulus (currents in channels 2 and 3 are identical).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. A 5-channel threshold tracking protocol reveals differences in the effect of mCPBG at the "resting" and a hyperpolarized membrane potential. A: examples of C-fiber compound action potentials recorded with 5 different channels of the QTRAC program. Channels 1–3 were used for determination of the threshold current and the postspike excitability at the resting membrane potential (stimulation frequency: 0.33 Hz; see also Fig. 2). In addition, in channels 4 and 5, a prepulse (start 50 ms before the test action potential) was used to test membrane excitability and postspike changes in threshold at a hyperpolarized membrane potential. B: continuous registration of threshold current, peak height, and latency of the test action potential obtained by the different stimulus conditions. Note the reduction of threshold current and postspike superexcitability when the effect of mCPBG was studied using hyperpolarizing prepulses (channels 4 and 5). In contrast, only a very small effect of m-chlorophenylbiguanide (mCPBG) on excitability parameters was seen at the resting membrane potential of the C-fibers at the stimulation rate of 0.33 Hz (channels 2 and 3).

 
Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using paired or unpaired Student's t-test as appropriate. The levels of significance are given by: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.


 RESULTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Postspike excitability of C-fibers depends on stimulation rate

In initial experiments, the importance of the stimulation rate for changes in axonal excitability following a conditioning action potential, i.e., the recovery cycle of excitability in unmyelinated axons, was tested. Isolated segments of rat sural nerves were tested using three stimulus conditions (channels) of the program QTRAC: (channel 1) a constant supramaximal stimulus evoked the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude of the C fiber component of the CAP; (channel 2) a target response was set at 40% of the maximum response on channel 1, and the test stimulus current ("threshold current") was adjusted by computer to maintain the response close to the target; (channel 3) same protocol as for channel 2, but a conditioning supramaximal stimulus preceded the test stimulus (Fig. 1A). These three stimulus conditions were repeated continuously with either an interval of 3 or 1 s between the successive stimulation sweeps (effective stimulation frequency: 0.33 or 1 Hz; see METHODS). Changes in axonal excitability following a C-fiber CAP of maximal amplitude (i.e., the recovery cycle of excitability) were determined by comparison of the current necessary for a CAP with 40% of the maximum amplitude without (test stimulus only, channel 2) and with a conditioning stimulus of maximal amplitude (conditioning plus test stimulus, channel 3). The difference in these currents were determined for interspike intervals between the conditioning and the test stimulus of 10–100 ms.

A representative example of this type of experiment and the statistical analysis is illustrated in Fig. 1. At a stimulation frequency of 0.33 Hz, a long-lasting period of subexcitability was measured in the postspike recovery period. In contrast, axonal superexcitability was observed when the sural nerve preparations were stimulated with a stimulation frequency of 1 Hz. Changes of excitability in the postspike period were determined at the two stimulation frequencies in five different sural nerve preparations. Differences between 0.33 and 1 Hz are statistically significant for all tested intervals (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 at 10-ms intervals; Fig. 1C).

The importance of stimulation rate for changes in excitability during the postspike period was also tested by continuous threshold tracking at a fixed interval of 25 ms between the conditioning and the test CAP. A representative example for such an experiment is illustrated in Fig. 1B. In this recording, the baseline stimulation frequency of 0.33 Hz was increased to 1 Hz for 3 min. The increase in membrane threshold observed during the period of higher action potential activity was accompanied by a reversal from axonal sub- to superexcitability in the postspike period. Quantitatively, an inversion of membrane subexcitability from 14.4 ± 2.3% (n = 5; mean ± SD) at 0.33 Hz to super-excitability of –12.4 ± 4.0% (n = 5) at 1 Hz was observed.

Action potential frequency alters the effects of mCPBG

The effects of mCPBG, an agonist at axonal 5-HT(3) receptors, on axonal excitability and the postspike recovery period were tested at two different stimulation rates on C-fibers in rat sural nerve segments. A representative example for these experiments is illustrated in Fig. 2. The recording was started with a stimulation frequency of 1 Hz. At this stimulation rate, axonal superexcitability of ~10% was measured 30 ms after the conditioning compound C-fiber action potential. Addition of mCPBG into the bathing solution reduced membrane threshold by ~16% (reduction in threshold current from 385 to 325 µA) and produced a loss of postspike superexcitability. Afterward, the stimulation frequency was reduced to 0.33 Hz. This resulted in a reduction of membrane threshold and the development of postspike subexcitability (see also Fig. 1). Application of mCPBG during this condition resulted in an increase in excitability of only 5% (reduction in threshold current from 315 to 300 µA). In addition, the postspike subexcitability was slightly enhanced. This type of experiment was performed on several sural nerve fascicles (also with the opposite order of stimulation frequencies). The statistical analysis is illustrated in Fig. 4. The data reveal significant differences in the effects of mCBPG at low compared with high stimulation rates. In axons with high action potential frequency, mCPBG produced a large increase in axonal excitability accompanied by a reduction or loss of postspike superexcitability. In contrast, only a small reduction of threshold and an increase of the subexcitability in the recovery period was observed when the effects of mCPBG were tested at the low stimulation rate.


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Overview of activity- and potential-dependent effects of mCPBG such as illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. A: changes in membrane threshold observed during application of mCPBG (3 µM) at low (0.33 Hz) and high (1 Hz) stimulation rate and during a combination of low stimulation rate and a hyperpolarizing prepulse are summarized (means ± SD). Note that the strongest reduction in threshold (increase in excitability) was seen when mCPBG was added during the high stimulus rate. Membrane hyperpolarization, too, enhances the effect of mCPBG. B: summary of postspike excitability (interspike interval: 30 ms) measured before and during application of mCPBG (3 µM) in the 3 experimental conditions (means ± SD). Note that mCPBG reduces postspike superexcitability seen at the higher action potential frequency. However, the subexcitability at the lower stimulus rate is slightly increased. Membrane hyperpolarisation during stimulation with 0.33 Hz produces effects of mCPBG similar to a stimulus rate of 1 Hz. (number of experiments are given in each column; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

 
Importance of membrane potential.

The importance of action potential frequency on the postspike recovery period and on the increase in axonal excitability produced by mCPBG may be either due to the number of action potentials or due to activity-dependent changes in membrane potential. Therefore we recorded the postspike excitability during a constant stimulation frequency but at two different axonal membrane potentials. For this type of experiment, the threshold tracking protocol was extended by two additional channels. A typical observation made by using this five-channel threshold tracking protocol on an isolated rat sural nerve segment is illustrated in Fig. 3. Postspike excitability at the "resting" membrane potential was determined using channel 2 (current necessary for a target response set at 40% of the maximum peak amplitude of the CAP) and channel 3 (same parameter 30 ms after a conditioning maximal CAP). In addition, in channels 4 and 5, postspike excitability was determined during membrane hyperpolarization induced by application of current pulses with an onset 50 ms before the test pulse (amplitude: –10% of current used in channel 1; duration: 100 ms).

By using this threshold tracking protocol, it is revealed that postspike excitability depends on membrane potential and not on stimulation frequency. The example in Fig. 3 illustrates that the rat C-fiber axons stimulated at a frequency of 0.33 Hz are subexcitable at a stimulus interval of 30 ms (see threshold tracking channels 2 and 3). However, postspike superexcitability was observed during application of hyperpolarizing prepulses (see threshold tracking channels 4 and 5). Quantitatively, postspike excitability at the "resting" potential and during membrane hyperpolarization were determined in four rat sural nerve segments at a stimulation frequency of 0.33 Hz (interspike interval: 30 ms). Postspike subexcitability of 10.8 ± 3.1% (n = 4) was found at the resting potential. In contrast, membrane hyperpolarization produced axonal postspike superexcitability of –8.3 ± 2.5% (n = 4).

The five-channel threshold tracking protocol was also used during bath application of mCPBG (Fig. 3). We observed that membrane hyperpolarization, similar to the situation of a high action potential frequency, enhanced the mCPBG-induced increase in axonal excitability. Also, there was a strong reduction of postspike superexcitability when mCPBG was applied at a low stimulation rate but during a hyperpolarizing prepulse. A summary of these observations and the statistical analysis is illustrated in Fig. 4.

Effects of mCPBG on the postspike latency recovery period

Changes in latency during the postspike recovery period were determined using CAPs of maximal amplitude. A representative example for such experiments is illustrated in Fig. 5. The shape of the CAP differed strongly at the various stimulation rates. A rather uniform configuration was observed at 0.6 Hz. However, a segregation in an early and a late component was produced by an increase in the action potential frequency from 0.6 to 1.8 Hz (Fig. 5A). Addition of conditioning action potentials revealed frequency-dependent shifts in latency (Fig. 5B). Axonal conduction velocity was reduced (subnormal) 40 ms after a prepulse during a mean stimulation rate of 0.6 Hz. In contrast, a shorter latency (supernormality) to the late component in the CAP was found when the conditioning action potential was tested at 1.8 Hz.


Figure 5
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Activity-dependent changes in the shape of the compound C-fiber action potential. A: repetitive stimulation of a sural nerve branch with 0.6 or 1.8 Hz. The higher stimulation rate produces a segregation of the compound action potential into 2 discrete (early and late) components. B: effects of a conditioning prepulse on latency. A compound C-fiber action potential of supramaximal amplitude was elicited 40 ms before the test pulse (see inset for the stimulus protocol). The unconditioned and the conditioned test pulse during stimulation with 0.6 or 1.8 Hz are superimposed. Note the increase in latency (subnormality) in the postspike recovery period at 0.6 Hz. In contrast, a clear reduction in latency (supernormality) of the late component is produced by the conditioning prepulse at 1.8 Hz.

 
The effects of mCPBG on the postspike latency recovery period were tested using a five-channel stimulus protocol. In all five channels of this protocol, a test stimulus with a compound C-fiber action potential of maximal peak height was generated. In four of the stimulus channels, a single conditioning action potential of maximal amplitude was added with interspike intervals of 100, 40, 20, and 12 ms between the conditioning and the test stimulus. The effects of mCPBG (3 µM) were studied at different stimulation frequencies by using the latency to 50% of the test CAP peak amplitude as the recording parameter. A representative example for an observation made using a stimulus rate of 1.8 Hz and an interspike interval of 40 ms is illustrated in Fig. 6. A clear reduction in latency is revealed by superposition of the unconditioned and the conditioned test action potential (Fig. 6Aa). This difference in latency was strongly reduced in the presence of mCPBG (Fig. 6Ab). Details and the time course of this effect were observed by continuous recording of latencies as shown in Fig. 6B (from a different nerve preparation). The recording illustrates that the mCPBG-induced reduction in supernormality is mainly due to an increase in conduction velocity of the unconditioned action potential; the latency to the conditioned response remained rather constant. The effect had a rapid onset and persisted for several minutes after the end of the drug application. A summary of observations made by testing mCPBG on latency shifts in the postspike recovery period and the statistical analysis of these effects are illustrated in Fig. 7A. Also included in this graph are the data obtained when the effects of mCPBG on latency were tested at a stimulation frequency of 0.6 Hz. No statistically significant effect of mCPBG was observed under this experimental condition.


Figure 6
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. C fiber supernormality in rat sural nerve is reduced by activation of 5-HT(3) receptors. Aa: latency to a compound C fiber action potential of maximal amplitude (test in channel 1) and to a test response 40 ms after a conditioning maximal C fiber action potential (test in channel 2) are compared. Superposition of both responses (bottom) reveals reduction of latency (supernormality) induced by the conditioning action potential. Ab: addition of mCPBG (3 µM) to the bathing solution reduces postspike supernormality. B: continuous recording of latencies to an unconditioned (channel 1) and to a conditioned (channel 2) compound C-fiber action potential in a different preparation (action potential frequency 1.5 Hz). Bottom: percentage difference of latency. Note the reduction of supernormality in the presence of mCPBG.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Overview of activity-dependent effects of mCPBG on changes in latency seen in the recovery period. A: mean values (±SD) of changes in latency at different interspike intervals during the postspike recovery period. Note the reduction of supernormality (stimulus rate: 1.8 Hz) in the presence of mCPBG (3 µM). In contrast, mCPBG did not significantly change the postspike subnormality when tested at an action potential frequency of 0.6 Hz. B: calculation of changes in the interspike interval for a pair of action potentials (from data shown in A; see text). Postspike supernormality at an action potential frequency of 1.8 Hz reduces the interspike interval from 50 to ~20 ms after a conduction distance of 20 cm. Activation of 5-HT(3) receptors by mCPBG results in less change in interspike interval (reduction from 50 to 40 ms over a conduction distance of 20 cm). For comparison, data from single human mechano-insensitive C-fibers (CMI; Bostock et al. 2003Go) are also plotted. (** P < 0.01).

 
The changes in the postspike latency recovery period produced by mCPBG during a stimulation frequency of 1.8 Hz (see Fig. 7A) were used to calculate the consequences of this effect for the interspike interval in a pair of action potentials with an interspike interval of 50 ms (Fig. 7B). The calculation is based on one of the observations summarized in Fig. 7A. The conduction velocity of the CAP was ~0.7 m/s before and 0.8 m/s during application of mCPBG, and the changes in the interspike interval were calculated for segments of 5 cm for the situation that the pair of action potentials is conducted along a nerve segment of ≤40 cm. Data from a human mechano-insensitive C-fiber axon (CMI) at a stimulation rate of 2 Hz (Bostock et al. 2003Go) were used for comparison. It should be mentioned that this calculation is only a rough estimate due to reasons discussed later. The calculated data plotted in Fig. 7B indicate that the supernormality in the recovery period would produce a reduction of the interspike interval from 50 to ~20 ms after the conduction distance of 20 cm. However, in the presence of mCPBG, the interspike interval would be still 40 ms as compared with only 20 ms seen in the control condition.


 DISCUSSION
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Activity-dependent changes in latency, threshold, and postspike recovery cycle are well documented for rat (Gee et al. 1996Go; Shin and Raymond 1991Go; Thalhammer et al. 1994Go) and human (Bostock et al. 2003Go; Serra et al. 1999Go; Weidner et al. 2002Go) C-fiber axons. In most of these studies, single-fiber recordings in situ provided a method for correlation of electrophysiological parameters with the function of the C-fiber. Our experimental observations are based on recordings of CAPs from isolated short rat sural nerve segments in an organ bath. This type of recording allows stable electrophysiological recordings (for up to several hours) and application of inflammatory mediators to several millimeters of desheathed nerve segments. We confirm several observations previously made with single-fiber recordings in peripheral rat nerves such as changes of both threshold and conduction velocity following impulse activity (Shin and Raymond 1991Go) and differences in activity-dependent slowing of different classes of C-fibers (Gee et al. 1996Go; Thalhammer et al. 1994Go). The new finding is that an agonist at the 5-HT(3) receptor changes these activity-dependent electrophysiological parameters (including the superexcitability and supernormality in the postspike recovery period) of C-fiber axons.

Several previous studies revealed that trains of action potentials in axons are modified by voltage-dependent ion channels, changes in intra- or extracellular ion concentrations, and variations in structural parameters such as the axonal diameter (Debanne 2004Go). However, there is much less literature about the importance of axonal chemosensitivity for the conduction of bursts of action potentials and the functional consequences of this type of neuromodulation. Axonal information processing has been found in studies using recordings from crustacean axons. For example, focal application of dopamine to motor axons evokes additional action potentials in intervals of spike bursts generated in the soma of the motor neuron. Thus the peripheral axon can shape the output signaling to the muscles (Bucher et al. 2003Go). Also axons of neurons in command and integrating centers of the crustacean nervous system are activated by neuroligands such as octopamine (Goaillard et al. 2004Go). This effect can modulate the central pattern generating network of the pyloric rhythm. An example for axonal information processing in mammalian sensory axons has been found along central axons of trigeminal muscle spindle afferents involved in jaw movements (Verdier et al. 2003Go). Propagation of antidromic spikes in these sensory neurons is controlled by GABAA receptors located on the caudal axon. Data in the present study demonstrate that modulation of axonal excitability by serotonin can prolong the interspike interval in unmyelinated axons of a mammalian peripheral nerve trunk. This effect might alter the perception of a stimulus applied to the peripheral terminal of a nociceptive neuron.

Possible function of fibers with effects of mCPBG

Different classes of C-fibers contribute to the shape of the CAPs recorded in the present study. The function of the fibers affected by mCPBG are not clearly revealed under these circumstances. However, a segregation of the compound potential into two components was observed at higher action potential frequencies (see Fig. 5). In single-fiber recordings described by other authors, differences in activity-dependent slowing of the various functional classes of C-fibers in peripheral rat and human nerve have been observed. According to these data, there is more activity-dependent reduction of conduction velocity in unmyelinated nociceptive as compared with nonnociceptive (e.g., cold) fibers (Gee et al. 1996Go; Serra et al. 1999Go; Thalhammer et al. 1994Go). In human skin nerve, single sympathetic C-fiber efferents have also been studied. These fibers, too, showed much less activity-dependent slowing as compared with nociceptive axons (Campero et al. 2004Go). Previously, we demonstrated that sympathectomy does not influence the effect of mCPBG on axonal excitability in sural nerve of the rat, indicating an effect on sensory C-fiber afferents rather than postganglionic sympathetic efferents (Moalem et al. 2005Go). In the present study, mCPBG produced a reduction in latency (increase in conduction velocity) of the late component in the CAP recorded at high stimulation rates (see Fig. 5). This indicates that mCPBG modulates the excitability of nociceptive C-fiber axons.

The use of CAPs in threshold tracking experiments has the disadvantage that changes in peak height may occur due to alterations in the conduction velocities of the constituent nerve fibers. For this reason, the maximal response of the compound potential was measured before each test stimulus. This procedure ensures that the determination of the threshold current is based on a signal with 40% of the actual maximal amplitude and not of a fixed value set at the beginning of the recording period. Any changes in peak height due to alterations in conduction velocity are thereby compensated appropriately, provided conduction slowing is similar for the fibers contributing to the maximal peak and those contributing to the 40% level.

Modulation of superexcitability and supernormality

Both the reductions in threshold (superexcitability) and in latency (supernormality) observed in the postspike recovery period at action potential frequencies ≥1 Hz are consequences of a long-lasting depolarizing afterpotential. At present, based on detailed microneurographic studies of single human axons, the depolarizing afterpotential of C-fibers is explained as a passive electrical phenomenon (Bostock et al. 2003Go; Weidner et al. 2002Go). Previously, this hypothesis has been used to model the depolarizing afterpotential in amphibian A-fibers (Barrett and Barrett 1982Go). According to this model, an action potential produces a long-lasting passive depolarizing afterpotential if the axonal membrane has a long membrane time constant. In fact, Bostock and colleagues (2003)Go determined a mean value of 110 ms for the membrane time constant of human C-fiber axons. The postspike afterpotential is given roughly by (QNaQK)/C, which decays with a time constant given by membrane resistance and membrane capacitance. QNa and QK describe the number of Na+ and K+ ions that pass through voltage-dependent sodium and potassium channels during the action potential; C is the membrane capacitance. Whether the afterpotential is de- or hyperpolarizing is determined by the voltage dependence of QNa and QK, rather than by the membrane resistance, which in human C-nociceptors is fairly constant at stimulation frequencies of ≥0.25 Hz (Bostock et al. 2003Go). This model can explain why an increase in the stimulation rate produces a change from postspike sub- to superexcitability (see Fig. 1) and from postspike sub- to supernormality (see Fig. 7), respectively. The most likely reason is that hyperpolarization due to electrogenic sodium pumping enhances the inward sodium current (i.e., more QNa) and reduces the outward potassium current (less QK) during an action potential. The stimulation frequency itself, on the other hand, does not seem to cause this phenomenon. Our observations made by using a five-channel threshold tracking protocol (Fig. 3) support this view. Both, sub- and superexcitability can be recorded at stimulation frequencies <1 Hz when the recovery period is tested at the "resting" and a hyperpolarized membrane potential.

Application of mCPBG [agonist at 5-HT(3) receptors] strongly reduced postspike superexcitability and supernormality. The presence of 5-HT(3) receptors on peripheral nociceptive nerve fibers is well documented (Beck and Handwerker 1974Go; Zeitz et al. 2002Go). In particular, the depolarizing effect of 5-hydroxytryptamine and mCPBG on unmyelinated axons in vagus nerve preparations has been studied in much detail (Elliott and Wallis 1990Go; Kilpatrick et al. 1990Go). A cationic inward current through the ionotropic 5-HT(3) subtype of serotonin receptor (Hoyer et al. 2002Go) produces this effect. Membrane depolarization seems to be also the main mechanism underlying the mCPBG-induced increase in axonal excitability of unmyelinated nerve fibers in rat sural nerve (see Fig. 2). An example of a functional consequence is the finding that serotonin sensitizes acutely axotomized nerve fibers to mechanical stimuli (Michaelis et al. 1998Go). Effects of serotonin have been also observed on motor axons. In this case, modulation of crustacean motor axons by serotonin is likely to influence the strength and duration of muscle contraction (Meyrand et al. 1992Go). A further aspect in the modulation of axonal function by serotonin described in the present study is the reduction of superexcitability and supernormality in the recovery period. These effects can be explained by the model described in the preceding text. Membrane depolarization produces a voltage-dependent decrease in the inward sodium current (less QNa) and an increase in outward potassium current (more QK) during the action potential. As a consequence, the depolarizing afterpotential, and the postspike superexcitability and supernormality are reduced.

Effects of mCPBG on C-fiber axons at low action potential frequency

During a stimulation rate of <1 Hz, mCPBG only induced a small increase of axonal excitability (see Fig. 4). This difference to the effect observed at higher action potential frequencies (≥1 Hz) can be explained by the relationship between membrane potential and threshold current of peripheral axons (e.g., Fig. 11 in Bostock and Grafe 1985Go). This U-shaped relationship is based on the voltage dependency of ion channels that contribute to the threshold of the axonal membrane. As a consequence, membrane depolarization has less effect on threshold at a relatively low as compared with a high "resting" potential. We also observed that mCPBG slightly enhanced the subexcitability observed during the recovery period at low action potential frequencies (<1 Hz). According to the model described in the preceding paragraph, postspike subexcitability is generated by a long-lasting hyperpolarizing afterpotential due to a capacitative net outward current produced when QK exceeds QNa during the action potential at a low membrane potential. In the presence of mCPBG, membrane depolarization results in a reduction of QNa due to voltage-dependent inactivation of Na+ channels. In addition, a voltage-dependent increase in outward potassium current (more QK) is produced. The consequence of these effects is an increase in postspike subexcitability.

Relevance of findings for pathophysiology of nerve trunk inflammation

We observed that activation of 5-HT(3) receptors alters axonal excitability and conduction velocity in the postspike recovery period of unmyelinated axons in a peripheral rat nerve. This effect is more marked in active axons, i.e., at action potential frequencies >1 Hz. It is likely that such changes in electrophysiological parameters have consequences for the axonal function in a condition such as nerve trunk inflammation. The fact that mCPBG is less effective at the axonal "resting" potential (low rate of action potentials) indicates that the activation of 5-HT(3) receptors results in modulation of action potential series rather than in recruitment of resting fibers. The overall effect of the various changes in excitability is an increase in threshold current necessary for initiation of a second action potential. In latency recordings, this effect produces a clear increase in the interspike interval if pairs of action potentials are conducted along long nerve segments (see Fig. 7). Interestingly, this phenomenon has been seen in human C-fibers after skin inflammation (Olausson 1998bGo).

The consequences of postspike supernormality for the conduction of impulse series have been documented using single fiber recordings from peripheral human C-fibers. In a study by Weidner and colleagues (2002)Go, the output frequency (interspike interval) recorded at knee level was compared with the input frequency (interstimulus intervals of 20 or 50 ms) applied to the receptive field at the foot. At higher action potential frequencies, interspike intervals decreased because of the supernormal period to a minimum of ~11 ms. Our data indicate that inflammatory mediators released during nerve trunk inflammation may alter this activity-dependent modulation of action potential series. The calculation plotted in Fig. 7B results in the conclusion that activation of the 5-HT(3) receptor by mCPBG produces much less activity-dependent reduction of the interspike interval. However, we would like to emphasize that the accuracy of this calculation is limited due to the use of isolated short nerve segments. First, it is difficult to measure a conduction velocity because the exact site of action potential generation in the tip of the suction electrode is unknown. Second, we have used a bath temperature of ~30°, which is below the in vivo condition. Nevertheless, the data indicate clear changes in the interspike interval when trains of impulses are conducted at high action potential frequencies along a long stretch of a depolarized C-fiber axon. We demonstrate that this effect may be produced by serotonin on axons with pronounced activity-dependent slowing, i.e., nociceptive nerve fibers.

Changes in interspike intervals and/or the duration of a train of action potentials may modify temporal summation and/or long-term potentiation at the synaptic contacts of nociceptive fibers in the dorsal spinal horn (Sandkuhler and Liu 1998Go). This effect might modify the perception of a stimulus applied to the peripheral terminals of a primary afferent nociceptive neuron. Also it has been suggested that the activity-dependent reversal from sub- to superexcitability in the recovery period may enhance the contrast between nociceptive stimuli of low and high intensity (Weidner et al. 2002Go). According to this view, the loss of superexcitability and supernormality produced by activation of the 5-HT(3) receptor may lead to a decrease in the ability to discriminate different stimulus strengths.

In summary, our data indicate the possibility that mediators in the inflammatory milieu such as 5-HT(3) contribute to symptoms in nerve trunk inflammation, not only by lowering the threshold for spike initiation but also by altering the interspike intervals in trains of action potentials.


 GRANTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 391/TP A1 to P. Grafe and by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia to D. J. Tracey and G. Moalem-Taylor.


 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank C. Müller for valuable technical assistance.


 FOOTNOTES
 
* P. M. Lang and G. Moalem-Taylor contributed equally to this work. Back

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Grafe, Dept. of Physiology, University of Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 12, D-80336 Munich, Germany (E-mail: P.Grafe{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de)


 REFERENCES
 
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Barrett EF and Barrett JN. Intracellular recording from vertebrate myelinated axons: mechanism of the depolarizing afterpotential. J Physiol 323: 117–144, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beck PW and Handwerker HO. Bradykinin and serotonin effects on various types of cutaneous nerve fibers. Eur J Physiol Pfluegers 347: 209–222, 1974.

Bostock H, Campero M, Serra J, and Ochoa J. Velocity recovery cycles of C fibers innervating human skin. J Physiol 553: 649–663, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bostock H, Cikurel K, and Burke D. Threshold tracking techniques in the study of human peripheral nerve. Muscle and Nerve 21: 137–158, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bostock H and Grafe P. Activity-dependent excitability changes in normal and demyelinated rat spinal root axons. J Physiol 365: 239–257, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bromm B, Jahnke MT, and Treede RD. Responses of human cutaneous afferents to CO2 laser stimuli causing pain. Exp Brain Res 55: 158–166, 1984.[Web of Science][Medline]

Bucher D, Thirumalai V, and Marder E. Axonal dopamine receptors activate peripheral spike initiation in a stomatogastric motor neuron. J Neurosci 23: 6866–6875, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burke D, Kiernan MC, and Bostock H. Excitability of human axons. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1575–1585, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Campero M, Serra J, Bostock H, and Ochoa JL. Partial reversal of conduction slowing during repetitive stimulation of single sympathetic efferents in human skin. Acta Physiol Scand 182: 305–311, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Debanne D. Information processing in the axon. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 304–316, 2004.

Dray A. Inflammatory mediators of pain. Br J Anaesthesiol 75: 125–131, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Elliott P and Wallis DI. Analysis of the actions of 5-hydroxytryptamine on the rabbit isolated vagus nerve. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 341: 494–502, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gee MD, Lynn B, and Cotsell B. Activity-dependent slowing of conduction velocity provides a method for identifying different functional classes of C-fiber in the rat saphenous nerve. Neuroscience 73: 667–675, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Goaillard JM, Schulz DJ, Kilman VL, and Marder E. Octopamine modulates the axons of modulatory projection neurons. J Neurosci 24: 7063–7073, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Handwerker HO. Sixty years of C-fiber recordings from animal and human skin nerves: historical notes. Prog Brain Res 113: 39–51, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]

Hoyer D, Hannon JP, and Martin GR. Molecular, pharmacological and functional diversity of 5-HT receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71: 533–554, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Irnich D, Tracey DJ, Polten J, Burgstahler R, and Grafe P. ATP stimulates peripheral axons in human, rat and mouse—differential involvement of A2B adenosine and P2X purinergic receptors. Neuroscience 110: 123–129, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kilpatrick GJ, Butler A, Burridge J, and Oxford AW. 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide, a potent high affinity 5-HT3 receptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 182: 193–197, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lang PM, Burgstahler R, Sippel W, Irnich D, Schlotter-Weigel B, and Grafe P. Characterization of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the membrane of unmyelinated human C-fiber axons by in vitro studies. J Neurophysiol 90: 3295–3303, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lang PM, Tracey DJ, Irnich D, Sippel W, and Grafe P. Activation of adenosine and P2Y receptors by ATP in human peripheral nerve. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 366: 449–457, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Meyrand P, Weimann JM, and Marder E. Multiple axonal spike initiation zones in a motor neuron: serotonin activation. J Neurosci 12: 2803–2812, 1992.[Abstract]

Michaelis M, Vogel C, Blenk KH, Amarson A, and Jänig W. Inflammatory mediators sensitize acutely axotomized nerve fibers to mechanical stimulation in the rat. J Neurosci 18: 7581–7587, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moalem G, Grafe P, and Tracey DJ. Chemical mediators enhance the excitability of unmyelinated sensory axons in normal and injured peripheral nerve of the rat. Neuroscience 134: 1399–1411, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Moalem G and Tracey D. Immune and inflammatory mechanisms in neuropathic pain. Brain Res Rev 51: 240–264, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]

Olausson B. Recordings of polymodal single C-fiber nociceptive afferents following mechanical and argon-laser heat stimulation of human skin. Exp Brain Res 122: 44–54, 1998a.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Olausson B. Recordings of human polymodal single C-fiber afferents following mechanical and argon-laser heat stimulation of inflamed skin. Exp Brain Res 122: 55–61, 1998b.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sandkühler J and Liu X. Induction of long-term potentiation at spinal synapses by noxious stimulation or nerve injury. Eur J Neurosci 10: 2476–2480, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Serra J, Campero M, Ochoa J, and Bostock H. Activity-dependent slowing of conduction differentiates functional subtypes of C fibres innervating human skin. J Physiol 515: 799–811, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shin HC and Raymond SA. Excitability changes in C fibers of rat sciatic nerve following impulse activity. Neurosci Lett 129: 242–246, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Sommer C. Pain in Peripheral Nerve Diseases. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 2001.

Sommer C. Serotonin in pain and analgesia: actions in the periphery. Mol Neurobiol 30: 117–125, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Thalhammer JG, Raymond SA, Popitz-Bergez FA, and Strichartz GR. Modality-dependent modulation of conduction by impulse activity in functionally characterized single cutaneous afferents in the rat. Somatosens Mot Res 11: 243–257, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]

Verdier D, Lund JP, and Kolta A. GABAergic control of action potential propagation along axonal branches of mammalian sensory neurons. J Neurosci 23: 2002–2007, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vogel C, Mossner R, Gerlach M, Heinemann T, Murphy DL, Riederer P, Lesch KP, and Sommer C. Absence of thermal hyperalgesia in serotonin transporter-deficient mice. J Neurosci 23: 708–715, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weidner C, Schmelz M, Schmidt R, Hammarberg B, Orstavik K, Hilliges M, Torebjork HE, and Handwerker HO. Neural signal processing: the underestimated contribution of peripheral human C-fibers. J Neurosci 22: 6704–6712, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weidner C, Schmidt R, Schmelz M, Hilliges M, Handwerker HO, and Torebjork HE. Time course of post-excitatory effects separates afferent human C fiber classes. J Physiol 527: 185–191, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zeitz KP, Guy N, Malmberg AB, Dirajlal S, Martin WJ, Sun L, Bonhaus DW, Stucky CL, Julius D, and Basbaum AI. The 5-HT3 subtype of serotonin receptor contributes to nociceptive processing via a novel subset of myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptors. J Neurosci 22: 1010–1019, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. W. Ballo and D. Bucher
Complex Intrinsic Membrane Properties and Dopamine Shape Spiking Activity in a Motor Axon
J. Neurosci., April 22, 2009; 29(16): 5062 - 5074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/6/2963    most recent
00716.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grafe, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lang, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grafe, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the The American Physiological Society.