| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1Department of Physiology, University of Montreal; and 2Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Submitted 2 February 2006; accepted in final form 11 September 2006
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
; Waters and Smith 2000). Activation of PKC increases both the size and the rate at which the readily releasable pool (RRP) refills in cultured hippocampal autapses (Stevens and Sullivan 1998) and in chromaffin cells (Smith et al. 1998). In chromaffin cells, PKC enhances exocytosis both by increasing the RRP and by shifting vesicles to a highly Ca2+ sensitive state, enabling exocytosis at sites relatively distant from Ca2+ channels (Yang et al. 2002).
Aplysia sensory-to-motor neuron synapses show a marked depression at low frequencies that contributes to behavioral habituation (Byrne et al. 1978). Homosynaptic depression is reversed by the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) through activation of a Ca2+-independent form of PKC, PKC Apl II (Ghirardi et al. 1992; Manseau et al. 2001). Whereas activation of PKC by 5-HT increases transmitter release only at depressed synapses, activation of PKC by phorbol esters increases transmitter release at both naïve and depressed synapses (Braha et al. 1990; Ghirardi et al. 1992; Nakhost et al. 2003). However, the molecular targets of PKC at either depressed or naïve synapses have not been identified. We previously examined the role of the potential target synaptotagmin I (Syt I) in synaptic modulation of the sensory–motor synapse (Nakhost et al. 2003). However, although PKC phosphorylates Syt I in Aplysia and splicing of Syt I regulates transmitter release, synaptotagmin was not the phosphorylation target for PKC (Nakhost et al. 2003). Here, we focus on another possible substrate, synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25).
SNAP-25 is essential for evoked synaptic transmission. In SNAP-25–deficient mice, spontaneous release persists, whereas evoked release is abolished (Sørensen et al. 2003; Washbourne et al. 2002). SNAP-25 is involved in the molecular regulation of neurotransmitter release through its association with vehicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP, synaptobrevin) and syntaxin (Südhof 1995). Together these three factors form a stable SNARE complex of proteins (Fernàndez-Chacon and Südhof 1999), which is essential for evoked neurotransmitter release. In vitro evidence indicates that the SNARE complex can promote fusion between lipid vesicles (Schuette et al. 2004; Weber et al. 1998). Moreover, this complex is likely to provide a framework for a variety of protein interactions involved in assembly and recycling of synaptic vesicles (Brunger 2000).
Although the role of the SNARE complex in synaptic vesicle release is clear, there is less evidence that the physiological modulation of transmitter release arises from posttranslational modification of SNARE proteins. Perhaps the best evidence for this phenomenon is the phosphorylation of SNAP-25 at Ser187 by PKC (Genoud et al. 1999; Shimazaki et al. 1996). The amount of SNAP-25 associated with syntaxin decreases after PKC-induced phoshorylation of SNAP-25 in PC12 cells (Shimazaki et al. 1996) and phosphorylation at this site increases recruitment of dense-core vesicles in chromaffin cells (Nagy et al. 2002). However, SNAP-25 phosphorylation was not important for phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu)–mediated increase in transmitter release in CA1 neurons (Finley et al. 2003), calling into question whether SNAP-25 phosphorylation is also important in regulating release of synaptic vesicles.
In the present paper, we used the plastic synapses between mechanoreceptor sensory neurons and siphon motor neurons of Aplysia as a model to investigate whether PKC phosphorylation of SNAP-25 plays a modulatory role in evoked release of synaptic vesicles. Our results suggest an important role for SNAP-25 and phosphorylation of SNAP-25 in multiple aspects of the regulation of synaptic vesicle release at sensory–motor neuron synapses.
|
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
3 days before experimentation. Dissection and isolation of tissues and cultured neurons were as previously described (Manseau et al. 2001). Cloning of SNAP-25
Aplysia nervous system cDNA was generated using pleural, pedal, and abdominal ganglia from the animal. These ganglia were dissected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then processed using the Qiagen RNEasy Minikit (Qiagen, Santa Clara, CA) to obtain total RNA. cDNA template was made using Superscript II RT (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The cDNA product was subsequently used as a template in PCR to amplify fragments of SNAP-25 using degenerate primers. The following primers were used: SNAP-25 degenerate 5' primers: F1 [GA(T/C)GAN CA(A/G)GG NGA(A/G)CA], F2 [GA(T/C) ATGA(A/G) GA(A/G)GC NGA], degenerate 3' primers R1 [CAT(A/G)TC NA(T/A/G)NGC CAT(A/G)T], and R2 [TCN TCC AT(T/C)TC(G/A) T(T/C) TC(G/A) T(T/C)(T/C)TC].
The nested degenerate PCR provided a fragment of SNAP-25 that was then extended using rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) to generate the full-length sequence. GST–SNAP-25 was then generated using RT-PCR from total nervous system RNA to insert the full length Aplysia SNAP-25 into pGEX-5X-1. This plasmid was then cut with Bam HI and Kpn I to insert into the plasmid pNEX-3 for expression in Aplysia neurons and pGEX5.2 for generation of a GST–SNAP 25 fusion protein. To confirm that this isoform of SNAP-25 was expressed in sensory neurons we recloned SNAP-25 using RT-PCR from total sensory neuron RNA and examined three independent PCR products. All PCR products were identical to the previously isolated Aplysia SNAP-25. EGFP fusion proteins were generated by amplifying SNAP-25 with PCR and inserting into the Kpn site of pNEX3–EGFP. The lack of introduced errors was again confirmed with sequencing. Finally, mutations were made with overlap PCR and confirmed by sequencing. All sequencing was done on both strands using the services of Bio S&T (Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Aplysia SNAP-25 GenBank Accession Number: DQ382281.
Expression in SF9 cells
The pNEX-3 plasmids were expressed in SF9 cells by transfection with lipofectamine. By 48 h after transfection cells were harvested in sample buffer and separated on SDS–PAGE gels, transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with an antibody to GFP.
Generation of an antibody to SNAP-25
The GST–SNAP 25 fusion protein was used as an immunogen for injection into rabbits. The resultant serum was used without purification.
Fluorescence microscopy
Injected sensory neurons were visualized at x4 with a Nikon fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse E600). The success rate of expression ranged from 50 to 90%. Expression was stable 24 h after injection and the cells remained fluorescent for about 1 wk.
Cell culture preparation
Injections of plasmid DNA and physiological paradigms were as previously described (Manseau et al. 2001). Briefly, 4 days after injection of the EGFP-tagged construct into the sensory neuron (SN) and 2 days after pairing with a motor neuron (MN), excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were evoked every 20 s in the motor neuron that was kept at –50 mV. After 40 evoked EPSPs, 5-HT (10 µM final concentration) was added to the bath and 10 additional EPSPs were sampled. In another set of experiments, the phorbol ester phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu, 100 nM final concentration) was added after the first EPSP, a second EPSP was evoked 10 min later, followed by 38 evoked EPSPs to observe the rate of depression afterward. In some of the PDBu experiments a PKC inhibitor, bisinoolylmaleimide I (Bis) (10 µm final concentration), was added to the bath 10 min before the start of an experiment and remained in the bath throughout. All experiments were performed at room temperature and the initial EPSP amplitude had to be 2 mV for an experiment to progress. In a couple of experiments the MN spiked in the first EPSP or after the addition of PDBu. In this case we measured the EPSP at the shoulder of the spike.
Data acquisition and analysis
Data were acquired and analyzed digitally using CLAMPEX 9 and a modified version of pCLAMP (Axon Instruments) (Manseau et al. 2001). The effects of the various constructs were always tested in parallel. EPSPs were always normalized to the size of the initial EPSP.
Changes in synaptic transmission
The difference in homosynaptic depression was quantified using a nonparametric bootstrap test procedure with 10,000 repetitions and a criterion of P < 0.05 (Efron and Tibshirani 1986). The amount of facilitation was calculated as the difference between EPSPs after treatment (averages of EPSPs 41–43) and EPSPs before treatment (averages of EPSPs 38–40), or in the case of PDBu, the difference between EPSP 1 and EPSP 2 measured after PDBu. Significance was calculated by Student's t-test.
Immunofluorescence
To identify the localization of SNAP-25 wild-type and SNAP-25 mutants at Aplysia sensory–motor synapses, dissociated Aplysia SNs were plated on Matek (Ashland, MA) polylysine-coated glass-bottom culture dishes and coinjected with EGFP–SNAP-25 and DsRed–VAMP (as an indicator for synapse localization) or DsRed–VAMP alone. The cultures were subsequently labeled with an Aplysia-specific SNAP-25 antibody (Anti SNAP-25). Four days after injection of the EGFP-tagged construct into the SN and 2 days after pairing with an MN, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in a 30% sucrose-buffered PBS solution for 60 min. The cells were then solubilized and permeabilized in a 30% sucrose-buffered PBS containing 0.1% Triton for 10 min. The cultures were rinsed in PBS and free aldehydes were quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl for 30 min, then incubated in 10% normal goat serum containing 0.5% Triton in PBS for 30 min to block nonspecific binding. After 1-h incubation with primary antibodies (Anti SNAP-25) diluted (1:50) in blocking buffer, cultures were rinsed in PBS and incubated for 1 h in Alexa Fluor 644–conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:200) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted in blocking buffer. Cultures were rinsed in PBS and then mounted with Shandon Immu-Mount (Thermo, Pittsburg, PA) mounting media. All steps were performed at room temperature.
Confocal microscopy
The triple-labeled sections were visualized simultaneously with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), equipped with one argon (488 nm) and two He/Ne lasers of 543 and 633 nm.
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
Aplysia SNAP-25 was cloned using degenerate PCR and RACE and confirmed by sequencing three clones isolated using RT-PCR from sensory neurons. We found that the PKC phosphorylation site Ser198 in Aplysia (the equivalent of mammalian Ser187) is conserved over evolution. Figure 1A shows the amino acid alignment with other published SNAP-25 sequences. To study the effect of the phosphorylation of Ser198 in SNAP-25, various plasmid constructs encoding EGFP or EGFP-tagged SNAP-25 constructs were generated. We replaced Aplysia Ser198 with the negatively charged glutamate (S198E) or aspartate (S198D), both of which mimic the effect of PKC phosphorylation by introducing a negative charge, but may differ in their orientation based on possible rotamer possibilities, and thus may impose spatial constraints on the three-dimensional structure of SNAP-25. Conversely, we substituted serine with the nonpolar alanine (S198A) or cysteine (S198C), both of which cannot be phosphorylated. Cysteine is suggested to be a better substitute for the nonphosphorylated state because of its longer side chain, but there is a danger of forming inappropriate disulfide bonds. EGFP was coupled to the N-terminus of SNAP-25 as an indicator of expression. N-terminal–coupled EGFP–SNAP-25 was used in a number of functional studies in other systems and is reported to fully functionally replace SNAP-25 (Finley et al. 2002, 2003; Nagy et al. 2002, 2004; Sørensen et al. 2002). All EGFP–SNAP-25 constructs expressed well in SF9 cells and we did not observe any cleavage between the EGFP and SNAP-25 (Fig. 1B).
|
We further examined the subcellular distribution of EGFP–SNAP-25 and EGFP–SNAP-25 mutants and tested whether these constructs localized at synaptic sites. Both wild-type and mutant EGFP–SNAP 25 co-localized with DsRed-tagged Aplysia VAMP at concentrations of VAMP likely to mark pools of synaptic vesicles (Fig. 2A). FP-tagged VAMP was previously used to mark synaptic vesicle pools in many systems (Ahmari et al. 2000; Nonet 1999) and in Aplysia sensory neurons, tagged VAMP co-localizes with antibodies to clustered glutamate at sensory-to-motor neuron synapses (data not shown). However, some of the puncta of tagged VAMP (see wt SNAP-25 in Fig. 2A) do not co-localize. These are most probably small clusters of synaptic vesicles traveling down the neurites (Ahmari et al. 2000). Using an antibody raised to endogenous SNAP-25 (Fig. 2B), we also show that, as expected, endogenous SNAP-25 also localizes to sites where VAMP is concentrated (Fig. 2C, asterisk), although this is less obvious because SNAP-25 immunoreactivity is also present in the motor neuron and the immunolocalization of endogenous protein has more background staining than the fluorescent proteins. These experiments also demonstrate that the levels of overexpressed EGFP–SNAP-25 are much greater than those of the endogenous protein, as when sensory neurons are expressing EGFP–SNAP-25 (or the mutants; data not shown), at laser levels five times lower than in Fig. 2C and more than sufficient to detect the expressed protein, no staining is seen in the motor neuron (Fig. 2D).
|
Sensory neurons injected with various plasmids were paired with motor neurons to obtain functional synapses in isolated cell cultures (see Manseau et al. 2001). Synaptic depression was produced by 40 repeated intracellular stimulations of the sensory cell with an interstimulus interval of 20 s. Mutants mimicking the phosphorylated state (S-E, S-D) slowed down the rates of depression (Fig. 3A). Homosynaptic depression (HSD) in Aplysia is characterized by an initial rapid phase and a subsequent slow phase, during which the response remains fairly stationary, after the major part of HSD has already taken place (Armitage and Siegelbaum 1998; Royer et al. 2000). After seven to ten stimuli, the EPSP amplitude of the control EGFP–SNAP-25 was rapidly reduced to 27% of the initial EPSP amplitude and slowly decreased to 12% at the end of the stimulation period (EPSPs 38–40), whereas when sensory cells expressed the phosphomimetic mutant S-E or S-D, the plateau started at 48 and 40% of the initial EPSP, respectively, and decreased to about 22 and 18% after 40 stimuli. We observed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) for S-E throughout the stimulation period. For S-D we observed a statistical difference (P < 0.05) only through parts of the stimulation period (EPSPs 4–5, 7–8, 20–25, 28–31, and 36–37). In contrast, there was no significant difference on the rate of depression between mutants mimicking the nonphoshorylated state of SNAP-25 (S-A or S-C) and the control (Fig. 3B).
|
), we first confirmed that in Aplysia neurons the effects of PDBu on synaptic strength are mediated by PKC using a specific PKC inhibitor, Bisindoleamide I (Bis). Bis completely blocked the ability of PDBu to increase transmitter release at naïve synapses, confirming earlier results (Braha et al. 1990) that this effect is mediated by PKC (Fig. 4, A and B). Strikingly, the increase in synaptic strength seen after PDBu treatment was also significantly blocked in sensory neurons expressing the nonphosphorylated state mutant of SNAP-25 (P < 0.01), but not when wild-type EGFP–SNAP-25 was expressed (Fig. 4, A and B). The effect of expressing the nonphosphorylated state mutant of SNAP-25 was similar to that of Bis.
|
Overexpression of SNAP-25 or phosphomutants does not affect initial synaptic strength
If phosphorylation of SNAP-25 was sufficient to increase synaptic strength, one might expect that neurons expressing phosphomimetics of SNAP-25 would have higher initial synaptic strength and the nonphosphorylated-state SNAP-25 would have lower initial synaptic strength. Although, similar to other studies (Nakhost et al. 2003), we observed large variabilities in initial synaptic strength, there was certainly not a trend for any of the phosphomimetic constructs to increase synaptic strength (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5). One hypothesis proposed by Waters and Smith (2002) argues that the proportion of recycling vesicles in the readily releasable pool differs from synapse to synapse (Waters and Smith 2002; Zhao and Klein 2003) and this may account for the heterogeneity of our data.
|
We next examined the ability of 5-HT to reverse synaptic depression in paired neurons where the sensory cells were preinjected with various constructs. 5-HT (10 µM, final concentration) was added to induce PKC-dependent facilitation (Ghirardi et al. 1992). Our electrophysiological results show that the reversal of depression was reduced by overexpression of EGFP–SNAP-25 (Fig. 6A). This was a surprising result; EGFP–SNAP-25 was previously reported to functionally replace SNAP-25 in a number of systems, yet here it appeared to act as a dominant negative construct. To determine whether the EGFP attachment at the N-terminal end was responsible for this effect, we separately injected EGFP and SNAP-25 (SNAP-25 + EGFP in Fig. 6). This did not interfere with the reversal of depression, suggesting that the addition of EGFP to the N-terminal converted SNAP-25 to a dominant negative construct. This effect is specific for the reversal of depression because EGFP–SNAP 25 did not affect initial synaptic strength (Fig. 5), PDBu-mediated increases in synaptic strength (Fig. 4A), or the normal rate of synaptic depression (Fig. 3). Interestingly, overexpression of EGFP–SNAP-25 with mutations at the PKC phosphorylation site, with the exception of the Ser-Asp (S198D) mutation, did not interfere with facilitation, suggesting that this amino acid was important for the ability of SNAP-25 to act as a dominant negative (Fig. 6B).
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
Although the data corroborate that phosphorylation of Ser187 in dense-core vesicle release in chromaffin cells is strong, no previous evidence indicates that this site is important for release of synaptic vesicles. Synaptic vesicles like dense-core vesicles exhibit multiple kinetic components of release, but the rates are about tenfold faster for synaptic vesicles (Mennerick and Matthews 1996; Sakaba and Neher 2001).
Phosphomimetics of Aplysia SNAP-25 decreased the rate of depression (Fig. 3). Unlike in chromaffin cells where exocytosis can be measured directly using capacitance and amperometry measurement, we can measure exocytosis only indirectly using the EPSP in the motor cells. Nevertheless, this result is similar to a study in adrenal chromaffin cells where overexpression of phosphomimetic mutants at SNAP-25 Ser187 resulted in enhanced vesicle recruitment (Nagy et al. 2002). In contrast to our results, this study demonstrated that overexpression of nonphosphorylated-state mutants at SNAP-25 Ser187 resulted in inhibition of vesicle pool refilling (Nagy et al. 2002). However, in this study the stimulus used for release led to enhanced phosphorylation of SNAP-25. Because PKC is not activated during 0.05-Hz stimulation and there was no effect of the nonphosphorylated-state EGFP–SNAP-25 on depression, it is unlikely that PKC phosphorylation of SNAP 25 plays a role in depression in Aplysia sensory–motor neuron synapses.
Synaptic depression in Aplysia appears to consist of two separate mechanisms. Klein and colleagues compared the effect of depression on the readily releasable pool (as measured by transmitter released by sucrose) and the effect on overall release. They found that only a fraction of the decrease in synaptic transmission during depression was the result of a decrease in the readily releasable pool (RRP) and the remainder was the result of a decrease in calcium-secretion coupling (Fig. 6; Zhao and Klein 2002). The percentage of depression attributed to the decrease in the RRP is approximately the same as the amount of depression recovered by expressing the phosphomimetic mutants, suggesting that these mutants act by blocking this decrease in the RRP seen with stimulation.
Phorbol esters increase transmission at naïve synapses through phosphorylation of SNAP-25
A striking result from this study is that the increase in transmitter release seen after PDBu treatment is almost completely blocked by expression of the SNAP-25 S-A mutant. This suggests that PDBu increases synaptic strength mainly through PKC phosphorylation of SNAP-25. Finley et al. (2003) examined the effect of replacement of SNAP-25 with phosphomimetic mutants in hippocampal neurons, but saw no effect of S187A mutants on PDBu increases in transmitter release and actually saw an increase in synaptic failures with an S187E mutation. The lack of effect in this case may be explained by the fact that the majority of phorbol-ester–mediated enhancement of transmitter release in CA1 neurons is mediated through Munc13 and not PKC (Rhee et al. 2002). It should be noted that PDBu-mediated increases in transmitter release in CA1 neurons are rather modest, for example, compared with effects at other hippocampal synapses (Hussain and Carpenter 2003).
In Aplysia sensory–motor synapses, PDBu mediates increases in transmitter release through PKC because PKC inhibitors block the effect of PDBu on transmitter release at naïve and depressed synapses (Braha et al. 1990; Fig. 4). These inhibitors target the ATP-binding site of PKC and thus do not affect nonkinase diacylglycerol–binding proteins such as Munc13 (Morgan et al. 2005). However, if phosphorylation of SNAP-25 was sufficient to increase transmitter release, one would have expected the phosphomimetics to significantly increase initial synaptic strength, although there was no trend to suggest this effect. One possibility is that the phosphomimetic SNAP-25s do not effectively mimic phosphorylated SNAP-25 for this physiological effect. Another possibility is that prolonged expression of the phosphomimetic SNAP-25s causes homeostatic changes in transmitter release that mask changes that may be seen after acute changes in phosphorylation. Alternatively, it may be that phosphorylation of SNAP-25 is necessary, but not sufficient, for the phorbol-ester–mediated increases in synaptic strength. Thus additional substrates of PKC, or activation of other phorbol-ester targets such as Munc-13 or ras guanine exchange factors (Dyer et al. 2003) may also be required in addition to SNAP-25 phosphorylation for the increase in transmitter release. Because 5-HT increases synaptic strength at depressed synapses through PKC (Ghirardi et al. 1992; Manseau et al. 2001), why does 5-HT not increase the synaptic strength of naïve synapses through PKC activation, especially because phorbol esters can? Many explanations have been proposed for this conundrum. One possibility is that the isoforms of PKC activated by phorbol esters and 5-HT may be distinct (Zhao et al. 2006) and phosphorylation of SNAP-25 may be isoform specific. Another possibility is that the initial increase in synaptic strength caused by activation of PKA may make irrelevant the modifications induced by 5-HT. Indeed, some data suggest that prolonged applications of 5-HT do result in PKC-mediated increases in synaptic strength at naïve synapses (Jin et al. 2005). PKA-mediated phosphorylation of SNAP-25 at a separate site may also increase synaptic strength (Hepp et al. 2002; Nagy et al. 2004).
Does SNAP-25 modulation of calcium dynamics play a role in depression?
During HSD the depression of transmitter release occurs downstream of calcium influx (Armitage and Siegelbaum 1998) and probably affects calcium-secretion coupling. A recent study in hippocampal GABAergic synapses shows that SNAP-25 negatively regulates neuronal calcium responsiveness to depolarization (Verderio et al. 2004). These neurons naturally lack SNAP-25, but contain the related SNAP-23. Exogenously expressing SNAP-25 into GABAergic neurons was sufficient to decrease the sensitivity of release to depolarization. Most of the above effect was localized to the 180–197 residues in the C-terminal portion of SNAP-25 containing the PKC phosphorylation site. In chromaffin cells the role of PKC is to increase the proportion of vesicles that are highly sensitive to calcium (Yang et al. 2002). These results together suggest a model where SNAP-25 naturally inhibits a step in calcium secretion coupling and that PKC activation can reverse this step.
In our experiments, overexpression of EGFP-coupled SNAP-25 acted as a dominant negative for the 5-HT–mediated reversal of depression, but not for initial synaptic strength or PDBu-mediated increases in synaptic strength. The specificity of the dominant negative effect suggests a distinct role of SNAP-25 in regulating depression independent of its role in transmitter release and vesicle availability. Thus although somewhat speculative, one model that is consistent with our data posits that during depression SNAP-25 acts to inhibit release at a postpriming step and thus blocking calcium-secretion coupling. This inhibition by SNAP-25 is sensitive to the amino acid at the phosphorylation site and thus many of the mutants do not compete with endogenous SNAP-25 for this interaction. The fact that the EGFP–SNAP-25 S-D mutant can still act as a dominant negative does not address whether PKC phosphorylation of SNAP-25 plays a direct role because the wild-type protein acts as a dominant negative as well, despite the likelihood that it is still phosphorylated after serotonin addition. Indeed, in chromaffin cells both S187A and S187D mutants had decreases in the fast burst of release, presumably resulting from sensitivity for some SNAP-25 interaction dependent on the exact conformation of the amino acid at this position (Nagy et al. 2002). Presumably, because of some steric restraint from the EGFP-tag, inhibition mediated by SNAP-25 cannot be released through PKC phosphorylation. This may be attributable either to phosphorylation of SNAP-25 by PKC or to PKC phosphorylation of an interacting partner.
How could SNAP-25 mediate this inhibition? The carboxy-terminal region is also required for Ca2+-dependent interaction of the calcium sensor Syt I and SNAP-25 during Ca2+-triggered exocytosis (Gerona et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2002). The interaction of Syt I with the SNARE complex is a leading candidate for the calcium-sensitive step regulating exocytosis (Bai et al. 2004; Tucker et al. 2004) and thus regulation of this interaction by phosphorylation could regulate calcium-secretion coupling. In previous work we showed that Syt I binding to SNAP-25 increases about two- to fourfold in the presence of calcium (Nakhost et al. 2004). However, we did not observe any differences in Syt I–SNAP-25 interactions with any of the mutations in the phosphorylation site (data not shown; see Nakhost et al. 2004). It should be noted though that these experiments investigated only the low-affinity interaction of Syt I with SNAP-25 compared with the high-affinity interaction of Syt I with the entire SNARE complex because SNAP-25 is largely unstructured as a monomer but acquires 
-helicity in binary and ternary SNARE complexes (Fasshauer et al. 1997). The G-protein 
inhibits exocytosis downstream of priming through binding to the C- terminus of SNAP-25 (Gerachshenko et al. 2005), perhaps interfering with the Ca2+-dependent binding to Syt I (Blackmer et al. 2005). Removal of this inhibition by 5-HT could be blocked by the EGFP–SNAP-25 dominant negative construct.
In conclusion, our data support that PKC phosphorylation of SNAP-25 is necessary, but probably not sufficient, for PDBu-mediated increases in transmitter release. Moreover, we provide suggestive evidence that SNAP-25 may play an important role in the block of calcium-secretion coupling that is important for HSD.
|
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. F. Castellucci, Pavillon Paul-G. Desmarais, 2960, Chemin de la tour, CP 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7 (E-mail: vincent.castellucci{at}umontreal.ca)
|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Armitage BA, Siegelbaum SA. Presynaptic induction and expression of homosynaptic depression at Aplysia sensorimotor neuron synapses. J Neurosci 18: 8770–8779, 1998.
Bai J, Wang CT, Richards DA, Jackson MB, Chapman ER. Fusion pore dynamics are regulated by synaptotagmin t-SNARE interactions. Neuron 5: 929–942, 2004.
Blackmer T, Larsen EC, Bartleson C, Kowalchyk JA, Yoon E-J, Preininger AM, Alford S, Hamm HE, Martin TFJ. G protein directly regulates SNARE protein fusion machinery for secretory granule exocytosis. Nat Neurosci 8: 421–425, 2005.[Web of Science][Medline]
Braha O, Dale N, Hochner B, Klein M, Abrams TW, Kandel ER. Second messengers involved in the two processes of presynaptic facilitation that contribute to sensitization and dishabituation in Aplysia sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 2040–2044, 1990.
Brunger AT. Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 3: 293–302, 2000.
Byrne JH, Castellucci VF, Kandel ER. Contribution of individual mechanoreceptor sensory neurons to defensive gill-withdrawal reflex in Aplysia. J Neurophysiol 41: 418–431, 1978.
Dyer JR, Manseau F, Castellucci VF, Sossin WS. Serotonin persistently activates the extracellular signal-related kinase in sensory neurons of Aplysia independently of cAMP or protein kinase C. Neuroscience 116: 13–17, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1: 54–77, 1986.
Fasshauer D, Bruns D, Shen B, Jahn R, Brunger AT. A structural change occurs upon binding of syntaxin to SNAP-25. J Biol Chem 272: 4582–4590, 1997.
Fernandez-Chacon R, Südhof TC. Genetics of synaptic vesicle function: toward the complete functional anatomy of an organelle. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 753–776, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Finley MF, Patel SM, Madison DV, Scheller RH. The core membrane fusion complex governs the probability of synaptic vesicle fusion but not transmitter release kinetics. J Neurosci 22: 1266–1272, 2002.
Finley MF, Scheller RH, Madison DV. SNAP-25 Ser187 does not mediate phorbol ester enhancement of hippocampal synaptic transmission. Neuropharmacology 45: 857–862, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Genoud S, Pralong W, Riederer BM, Eder L, Catsicas S, Muller D. Activity-dependent phosphorylation of SNAP-25 in hippocampal organotypic cultures. J Neurochem 72: 1699–1706, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Georgopoulos AP, Kettner RE, Schwartz AB. Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of arm movement by a neural population. J Neurosci 8: 2928–2937, 1988.[Abstract]
Gerachshenko T, Blackmer T, Yoon E-J, Bartleson C, Hamm H, Alford S. G acts at the C-terminus of SNAP-25 to mediate presynaptic inhibition. Nat Neurosci 8: 597–605, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Gerona RRL, Larsen EC, Kowalchyk JA, Martin TFJ. The C terminus of SNAP-25 is essential for Ca2+-dependent binding of synaptotagmin to SNARE complexes. J Biol Chem 275: 6328–6336, 2000.
Ghirardi M, Braha O, Hochner B, Montarolo PG, Kandel ER, Dale N. Roles of PKA and PKC in facilitation of evoked and spontaneous transmitter release at depressed and nondepressed synapses in Aplysia sensory neurons. Neuron 9: 479–489, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hepp R, Cabaniols J-P, Roche PA. Differential phosphorylation of SNAP-25 in vivo by protein kinase C and protein kinase A. FEBS Lett 532: 52–56, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hilfiker S, Augustine GJ. Regulation of synaptic vesicle fusion by protein kinase C. J Physiol 515: 169–180, 1999.
Hussain RJ, Carpenter DO. The effects of protein kinase C activity on synaptic transmission in two areas of rat hippocampus. Brain Res 990: 28–37, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Jin I, Kandel ER, Hawkins RD. The roles of PKA, PKC and CAMKII in facilitation at the Aplysia sensory motor neuron synapses depend on the duration of the exposure of 5-HT. Soc Neurosci Abstr 540.5, 2005.
Manseau F, Fan X, Hueftlein T, Sossin WS, Castellucci VF. Ca2+-independent PKC Apl II mediates the serotonin induced facilitation at depressed synapses in Aplysia. J Neurosci 21: 1247–1256, 2001.
Mennerick S, Matthews G. Ultrafast exocytosis elicited by calcium current in synaptic terminals of retinal bipolar neurons. Neuron 17: 1241–1249, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Morgan A, Burgoyne RD, Barclay JW, Craig TJ, Prescott GR, Ciufo LF, Evans GJ, Graham ME. Regulation of exocytosis by protein kinase C. Biochem Soc Trans 33: 1341–1344, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nagy G, Matti U, Nehring RB, Binz T, Retting J, Neher E, Sørensen JB. Protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation of synaptosome associated protein of 25 kDa at Ser 187 potentiates vesicle recruitment. J Neurosci 22: 9278–9286, 2002.
Nagy G, Reim K, Matti U, Brose N, Binz T, Rettig J, Neher E, Sorensen JB. Regulation of releasable vesicle pool sizes by protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of SNAP-25. Neuron 5: 417–429, 2004.
Nakhost A, Houeland G, Blandford VE Castellucci VF, Sossin WS. Identification and characterization of a novel splice variant of synaptotagmin I. J Neurochem 89: 354–363, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Nakhost A, Houeland G, Castellucci VF, Sossin WS. Differential regulation of transmitter release by alternatively spliced forms of synaptotagmin I. J Neurosci 23: 6238–6244, 2003.
Nonet ML. Visualization of synaptic specializations in live C. elegans with synaptic vesicle protein-GFP fusions. J Neurosci Methods 89: 33–40, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Rhee J-S, Betz A, Pyott S, Reim K, Varoqueaux F, Augustin I, Hesse D, Südhof TC, Takahashi M, Rosenmund R, Brose N. Phorbol ester- and diacylglycerol-induced augmentation of transmitter release is mediated by Munc13s and not by PKC. Cell 108: 121–133, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Royer S, Coulson RL, Klein M. Switching off and on of synaptic sites at Aplysia sensorimotor synapses. J Neurosci 20: 626–638, 2000.
Sakaba T, Neher E. Calmodulin mediates rapid recruitment of fast-releasing synaptic vesicles at a calyx-type synapse. Neuron 32: 1119–1131, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schuette CG, Hatsuzawa K, Margittai M, Stein A, Riedel D, Kuster P, Konig M, Seidel C, Jahn R. Determinants of liposome fusion mediated by synaptic SNARE proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 2858–2863, 2004.
Shimazaki Y, Nishiki T, Omori A, Sekiguchi M, Kamata Y, Kozaki S, Takahashi M. Phosphorylation of 25-kDa synaptosome-associated protein. Possible involvement in protein kinase C-mediated regulation of neurotransmitter release. J Biol Chem 271: 14548–14553, 1996.
Smith C, Moser T, Xu T, Neher E. Cytosolic Ca2+ acts by two separate pathways to modulate the supply of release-competent vesicles in chromaffin cells. Neuron 20: 1243–1253, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sørensen JB, Matti U, Wei S, Nehring RB, Voets T, Ashery U, Binz T, Neher E, Rettig J. The SNARE protein SNAP-25 is linked to fast calcium triggering of exocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1627–1632, 2002.
Sørensen JB, Nagy G, Varoqueaux F, Nehring RB, Brose N, Wilson MC, Neher E. Differential control of the releasable vesicle pools by SNAP-25 splice variants and SNAP-23. Cell 114: 75–86, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Stevens CF, Sullivan JM. Regulation of the readily releasable vesicle pool by protein kinase C. Neuron 21: 885–893, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Südhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle: a cascade of protein–protein interactions. Nature 375: 645–653, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tucker WC, Edwardson JM, Bai J, Kim HJ, Martin TF, Chapman ER. Identification of synaptotagmin effectors via acute inhibition of secretion from cracked PC12 cells. J Cell Biol 162: 199–209, 2003.
Verderio C, Pozzi D, Pravettoni E, Inverardi F, Schenk U, Coco S, Proux-Gillardeaux V, Galli T, Rossetto O, Frassoni C, Matteoli M. SNAP-25 modulation of calcium dynamics underlies differences in GABAergic and glutamatergic responsiveness to depolarization. Neuron 41: 599–610, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Washbourne P, Thompson PM, Carta M, Costa ET, Mathews JR, Lopez-Bendito G, Molnar Z, Becher MW, Valenzuela CF, Partridge LD, Wilson MC. Genetic ablation of the t-SNARE SNAP-25 distinguishes mechanisms of neuroexocytosis. Nat Neurosci 5: 19–26, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
Waters J, Smith SJ. Phorbol esters potentiate evoked and spontaneous release by different presynaptic mechanisms. J Neurosci 20: 7863–7870, 2000.
Waters J, Smith SJ. Vesicle pool partitioning influences presynaptic diversity and weighing in rat hippocampal synapses. J Physiol 541: 811–823, 2002.
Weber T, Zemelman BV, McNew JA, Westermann B, Gmachl M, Parlati F, Sollner TH, Rothman JE. SNAREpins: minimal machinery for membrane fusion. Cell 20: 759–772, 1998.
Yang Y, Udayasankar S, Dunning J, Chen P, Gillis KD. A highly Ca2+-sensitive pool of vesicles is regulated by protein kinase C in adrenal chromaffin cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 17060–17065, 2002.
Zhang X, Kim-Miller MJ, Fukuda M, Kowalchyk JA, Martin TFJ. Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin binding to SNAP-25 is essential for Ca2+-triggered exocytosis. Neuron 34: 599–611, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Zhao Y, Klein M. Modulation of the readily releasable pool of transmitter and of excitation-secretion coupling by activity and by serotonin at Aplysia sensorimotor synapses in culture. J Neurosci 22: 10671–10679, 2002.
Zhao Y, Leal K, Abi-Farah C, Sossin WS, Martin KC, Klein M. Isoform specificity of PKC translocation in living Aplysia sensory neurons and a role for Ca2+-dependent PKC APL I in the induction of intermediate-term facilitation. J Neurosci 26: 8847–8856, 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Fehrenbach, E. Lessmann, C. N. Zorn, M. Kuhny, G. Grochowy, G. Krystal, M. Leitges, and M. Huber Steel Factor Enhances Supraoptimal Antigen-Induced IL-6 Production from Mast Cells via Activation of Protein Kinase C-{beta} J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 7897 - 7905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Villareal, Q. Li, D. Cai, A. E. Fink, T. Lim, J. K. Bougie, W. S. Sossin, and D. L. Glanzman Role of Protein Kinase C in the Induction and Maintenance of Serotonin-Dependent Enhancement of the Glutamate Response in Isolated Siphon Motor Neurons of Aplysia californica J. Neurosci., April 22, 2009; 29(16): 5100 - 5107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Pozzi, S. Condliffe, Y. Bozzi, M. Chikhladze, C. Grumelli, V. Proux-Gillardeaux, M. Takahashi, S. Franceschetti, C. Verderio, and M. Matteoli Activity-dependent phosphorylation of Ser187 is required for SNAP-25-negative modulation of neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 323 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Shu, X. Liu, Y. Yang, M. Takahashi, and K. D. Gillis Phosphorylation of SNAP-25 at Ser187 Mediates Enhancement of Exocytosis by a Phorbol Ester in INS-1 Cells J. Neurosci., January 2, 2008; 28(1): 21 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Fioravante, R.-Y. Liu, A. K. Netek, L. J. Cleary, and J. H. Byrne Synapsin Regulates Basal Synaptic Strength, Synaptic Depression, and Serotonin-Induced Facilitation of Sensorimotor Synapses in Aplysia J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3568 - 3580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.-Y. Hu, Y. Chen, and S. Schacher Protein Kinase C Regulates Local Synthesis and Secretion of a Neuropeptide Required for Activity-Dependent Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8927 - 8939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. S. Sossin Isoform specificity of protein kinase Cs in synaptic plasticity Learn. Mem., April 2, 2007; 14(4): 236 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
