JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 979-993, 2007. First published December 6, 2006; doi:10.1152/jn.00767.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/2/979    most recent
00767.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lomber, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sprague, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lomber, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sprague, J. M.

Restoration of Acoustic Orienting Into a Cortically Deaf Hemifield by Reversible Deactivation of the Contralesional Superior Colliculus: The Acoustic "Sprague Effect"

Stephen G. Lomber1, Shveta Malhotra1 and James M. Sprague2,*

1Centre for Brain and Mind, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; and 2Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 25 July 2006; accepted in final form 22 November 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Removal of all contiguous visual cortical areas of one hemisphere results in a contralateral hemianopia. Subsequent deactivation of the contralesional superior colliculus (SC) nullifies the effects of the visual cortex ablation and restores visual orienting responses into the cortically blind hemifield. This deficit nullification has become known as the "Sprague Effect." Similarly, in the auditory system, unilateral ablation of auditory cortex results in severe sound localization deficits, as assessed by acoustic orienting, to stimuli in the contralateral hemifield. The purpose of this study was to examine whether auditory orienting responses can be restored into the impaired hemifield during deactivation of the contralesional SC. Three mature cats were trained to orient toward and approach an acoustic stimulus (broadband, white noise burst) that was presented centrally, or at one of 12 peripheral loci, spaced at 15° intervals. After training, a cryoloop was chronically implanted over the dorsal surface of the right SC. During cooling of the cooling loop to temperatures sufficient to deactivate the superficial and intermediate layers (SZ, SGS, SO, SGI), auditory orienting responses were eliminated into the left (contracooled) hemifield while leaving acoustic orienting into the right (ipsicooled) hemifield unimpaired. This deficit was temperature-dependently graded from periphery to center. After the effectiveness of the SC cooling loop was verified, auditory cortex of the middle and posterior ectosylvian and anterior and posterior sylvian gyri was removed from the left hemisphere. As expected, the auditory cortex ablation resulted in a profound deficit in orienting to acoustic stimuli presented at any position in the right (contralesional) hemifield, while leaving acoustic orienting into the left (ipsilesional) hemifield unimpaired. The ablations of auditory cortex did not have any impact on a visual detection and orienting task. The additional deactivation of the contralesional SC to temperatures sufficient to cool the superficial and intermediate layers nullified the deficit caused by the auditory cortex ablation and acoustic orienting responses were restored into the right hemifield. This restoration was temperature-dependently graded from center to periphery. The deactivations were localized and confirmed with reduced uptake of radiolabeled 2-deoxyglucose. Therefore deactivation of the right superior colliculus after the ablation of the left auditory cortex yields a fundamentally different result from that identified during deactivation of the right superior colliculus before the removal of left auditory cortex in the same animal. Thus the "Sprague Effect" is not unique to a particular sensory system and deactivation of the contralesional SC can restore either visual or acoustic orienting responses into an impaired hemifield after cortical damage.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In 1965 Sprague and Meikle described a series of studies that demonstrated that ablations of what was then considered visually responsive cortex in the cat induced a dense blindness in the contralateral visual field, which they assayed with a visual orienting task. In a subsequent study, Sprague (1966)Go showed that removal of a minimum of the superficial and intermediate layers of the contralesional superior colliculus could reverse the impact of the visual cortex ablation on visual orienting and went one step further, to show that it was not necessary to ablate the contralesional superior colliculus, but merely sever the intertectal commissure (Sprague 1966Go). The restoration of visual orienting after large visual cortical ablations is a phenomenon that has become known as the "Sprague Effect." This restoration was repeatedly demonstrated in numerous studies of the cat (Ciaramitaro et al. 1997Go; Lomber et al. 2002Go; Rosenquist et al. 1996Go; Sherman 1977Go; Wallace et al. 1989Go, 1990Go) and a recent human case also suggests that the effect can be identified in human subjects (Weddell 2004Go).

In the auditory system, although large unilateral lesions involving primary auditory and much of the remaining acoustically responsive cortex (Fig. 1) do not result in deafness in the contralesional hemifield, because each hemisphere receives input from both ears, they do result in profound sound localization deficits confined to the contralesional hemifield (Casseday and Diamond 1977Go; Cranford et al. 1971Go; Neff 1968Go; Neff et al. 1956Go; Jenkins and Masterton 1982Go; Strominger 1969Go; Thompson and Welker 1963Go; Whitfield et al. 1972Go). Although large ablations of acoustically responsive cortex produce a deficit in the contralesional hemifield, much smaller deactivations in auditory cortex also produce contralateral impairments. Specific removal or deactivation of primary auditory cortex (AI), the posterior auditory field (PAF), or the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) produces sound localization deficits in the contralateral hemifield (Casseday and Diamond 1977Go; Jenkins and Masterton 1982Go; Jenkins and Merzenich 1984Go; Malhotra et al. 2004Go; Malhotra and Lomber 2006Go; Strominger 1969Go; Whitfield et al. 1972Go). However, the effects of the large lesions appear to be more profound than the smaller individual deactivations.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Lateral view of the left hemisphere of the cat cerebrum showing the generally recognized auditory areas. Sulci are indicated in italics (aes, anterior ectosylvian sulcus; pes, posterior ectosylvian sulcus; ss, suprasylvian sulcus). Auditory cortical areas: AI, primary auditory cortex; AII, second auditory cortex; AAF, anterior auditory field; AES, auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus; dPE, dorsal posterior ectosylvian gyrus; DZ, dorsal zone of auditory cortex; IN, insular region; iPE, intermediate posterior ectosylvian gyrus; PAF, posterior auditory field; T, temporal region; VAF, ventral auditory field; VPAF, ventral posterior auditory field; and vPE, ventral posterior ectosylvian gyrus. A, anterior; D, dorsal; P, posterior; and V, ventral. Compiled from Reale and Imig (1980)Go, Ribaupierre (1997)Go, and Tian and Rauschecker (1998)Go. Gray region shows the intended ablation of the contiguous auditory areas.

 
In the midbrain, the superior colliculus (SC) plays a key role in the accurate spatial targeting of the head and eyes to both visual and acoustic stimuli (Apter 1946Go; Hess et al. 1946Go; Lomber et al. 2001Go; Sprague and Meikle 1965Go; Tunkl 1980Go). The SC is a laminated structure and can be divided into superficial and deeper layers (Kanaseki and Sprague 1974Go), with the superficial layers receiving input almost exclusively from visual structures (Graybiel 1975Go; Harting and Guillery 1976Go; Harting et al. 1992Go), whereas deeper layers receive afferents from visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices (Clemo and Stein 1984Go; Harting et al. 1992Go; Meredith and Clemo 1989Go; Tortelly et al. 1980Go). Accordingly, superficial layer neurons are exclusively visual, whereas deeper neurons respond to visual, acoustic, and somatosensory stimuli and many respond to more than one modality (Meredith and Stein 1986Go; Peck 1990Go; Stein et al. 1976Go; Wallace et al. 1993Go). Visual and auditory space and the body surface are mapped across the populations of neurons and the maps are in register across modalities and layers (reviewed by Stein 1984Go). Visual space can be mapped in both the superficial (Feldon et al. 1970Go) and deep (Meredith and Stein 1990Go) layers of the SC, whereas auditory space is mapped only in the deeper layers (Middlebrooks and Knudsen 1984Go; Palmer and King 1982Go). Therefore it was not surprising that deactivation of the SC must include both the superficial and deeper layers (SGI) to produce a deficit in accurate orienting to targets presented in the contralateral field (Lomber et al. 2001Go). In contrast, deactivation of only the superficial layers (SGS) is required to produce a deficit in orienting to visual targets presented in the contracooled field (Lomber et al. 2001Go). This view for a bipartite separation of function among the superficial and deep collicular layers has been bolstered by numerous anatomical, physiological, and behavioral studies (e.g., Casagrande and Diamond 1974Go; Casagrande et al. 1972Go; Edwards 1980Go; Harting et al. 1992Go; Stein and Meredith 1991Go, 1993Go).

Overall, because ablation of all visually or acoustically responsive cortex results in modality-specific deficits in the contralesional hemifield and deactivation of the contralesional SC can reverse the visual impairment, we asked the question: Is the restoration of orienting responses into an impaired hemifield after deactivation of the superior colliculus unique to the visual system? We hypothesized that deactivation of the superior colliculus contralesional to a large ablation of auditory cortex would restore acoustic orienting responses into the impaired hemifield. To test this hypothesis we trained cats to orient to an acoustic stimulus and examined their behavior during both individual and simultaneous deactivation of: 1) acoustically responsive cortex in one hemisphere and 2) the contralesional superior colliculus. The auditory cortex ablations resulted in profound deficits in orienting to acoustic stimuli presented at any position in the contralesional hemifield. The additional deactivation of the superficial and intermediate layers of the contralesional SC restored acoustic orienting responses into the right hemifield. These results confirmed our hypothesis that the "Sprague Effect" is not unique to the visual system and deactivation of the contralesional SC can restore either visual or acoustic orienting responses into an impaired hemifield after cortical damage.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Overview

Three mature (>6 mo old) domestic cats were obtained from a commercial laboratory animal breeding facility (Liberty Labs, Waverly, NY) and housed as a colony with unlimited access to water. Food intake was controlled and limited to the behavioral training/testing sessions and to 1 h at the conclusion of each day, when the animals had unlimited access to dry cat food. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (1993) and National Research Council's Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research (2003) and with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Western Ontario.

The three cats were trained on two detection and orienting tasks, one that used an acoustic stimulus and one that used a visual stimulus. After training, each cat had a single cooling loop chronically implanted over the dorsal surface of the right SC. The animals were then tested to confirm the effectiveness of the SC loop. Then, auditory cortex of the middle and posterior ectosylvian and anterior and posterior sylvian gyri was removed from the left hemisphere (Fig. 1). Finally, performance on the acoustic localization task was then tested with or without the collicular cryoloop being operational.

Apparatus

Training was conducted in an orienting arena that allowed for the presentation of either acoustic or visual stimuli. The apparatus (Fig. 2) was a semicircular arena (diameter 90 cm) that consisted of 13 pairs of miniature speakers and red, 2-V (DC) light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The speakers (part 25RF006, Mouser Electronics, Mansfield, TX) were 2.5 cm in diameter with a frequency response of 800 Hz to 5 kHz. The speaker/LED combinations were placed 15° apart along 180° of the azimuthal plane. The pairs were located 45 cm from the animal's start position and positioned at the cat's eye level. A food reward tray was located beneath each speaker/LED pair. The speakers emitted broadband noise bursts (100 ms in duration) and were calibrated at 78 dB SPL. Stimuli were generated using a Tucker-Davis Technologies (Alachua, FL) stimulus presentation workstation and SigGenRP stimulus design software. The calibration was conducted with a Larson Davis (Pleasant Grove, UT) model 800B sound level meter (SLM) with a 0.5-in. microphone placed equidistant between the L90 and R90 speakers. An A-weighting was used to determine the background noise level. For the experimental stimulus, we used broadband, white noise bursts rather than pure tones because orienting responses to short broadband noise bursts were previously identified to be much more accurate than responses to tones (Populin and Yin 1998Go). Testing was conducted in a sound-attenuated room lined with Sonex foam (Illbruck, Minneapolis, MN). Therefore the normal background noise of room ventilation was present, 58 dB(A), and the broadband, white noise burst stimulus was presented 20 dB above background (78 dB). Training was conducted in a dimly lit room and ambient light levels (23 cd/m2) were monitored using an Extech (Tampa, FL) data-logging light meter (model #401036).


Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Acoustic and visual orienting arena. A loudspeaker (top circle) and a light-emitting diode (LED, black dot) were located above a food reward locus (bottom circle) at each of 13 regularly spaced (15°) intervals (for sake of clarity, only 30° intervals are labeled). A: animal was first required to fixate on the central (0°) LED. B: it then had to orient to, and approach, an acoustic (100-ms broadband noise) or visual (100-ms LED flash) target to receive a food reward.

 
Two individuals conducted the experiments: an experimenter and the animal handler. The experimenter controlled the stimulus presentation, recorded the behavioral responses, and viewed a video monitor that displayed images from a video camera that looked down on the apparatus and was used to determine the accuracy of the orienting response. The orienting response on each trial was determined by the experimenter's inspection of the trial on the video monitor. Cooling deactivation sessions were videotaped. The videotaped responses were reviewed when the experimenter was unable to accurately determine the orienting response during testing. The animal handler was responsible for monitoring the animal and positioning it in the center of the apparatus and was blind to the stimulus presentation sequence. In the early stages of behavioral training is was necessary for the animal handler to securely hold the cat in position in the center of the apparatus. By the conclusion of training, the cats were merely positioned in the center of the apparatus and awaited the presentation of the stimulus. Therefore the animal handler could not inadvertently provide cues to the cat by contact.

Tasks and training

Each cat was pretrained to stand in the center of the arena and approach the illumination of the red LED at the 0° position. A piece of low-incentive, dry cat chow was then presented from the reward tray below the stimulus. During training, the animal's attention was first attracted to the central LED. Then, the LED was extinguished and the sound was presented at one of the 12 peripheral speakers or the central speaker. After the animal approached the stimulus it received the moist food reward from the food tray below the speakers. Any response other than a prompt direct approach to the appropriate stimulus was scored as incorrect. The cat was conditioned to approach the 0° position when an acoustic stimulus could not be localized and receive the low-incentive food. Premature responses were not scored and went unrewarded. Twenty-eight trials formed a block, with each of the 12 peripheral positions tested twice and the central position tested four times. Ten blocks of trials were collected in each session for a total of 280 trials. Catch trials, where no target stimulus was presented, were randomly conducted. As a control, the animals were also trained to orient to a visual stimulus. For the visual task, testing procedures were identical with the only difference being that the target stimulus consisted of a flashed (100-ms) red 2-V (DC) LED. During the final stages of training and during testing, behavioral procedures remained the same, although the cats wore a loose-fitting harness and a lightweight tether that supported the cooling tubes and microthermocouple wires. The tether, tubes, and wires were connected to a loop directly above the animal. Training was complete when a criterion performance level of 80% correct across the entire field was reached on two consecutive days.

Cryoloop implantation

On the day of surgery, all animals received an antiinflammatory medication [dexamethasone, 1.0 mg/kg, administered intramuscularly (im)] and atropine [0.03 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously (sc)] to reduce respiratory and alimentary secretions. The cannulated cephalic vein permitted administration of anesthetic and the infusion of fluids (2.5% dextrose and 1/2 strength lactated Ringer solution). Sodium pentobarbital (about 25 mg/kg to effect) was infused [intravenously (iv)] to induce general anesthesia. The cat was then installed in a stereotaxic apparatus and prepared for surgery using procedures described elsewhere (Lomber et al. 1999Go).

Cooling loops fashioned from 23-gauge stainless steel hypodermic tubing (Lomber et al. 1999Go) were shaped to conform to the dorsal surface of the superior colliculus. The collicular cryoloops were circular with an inside loop diameter of 2.5 mm. Attached to the union of each loop was a microthermocouple. Collicular cryoloops were implanted using standard procedures (Keating and Gooley 1988Go; Lomber and Payne 1996Go; Lomber et al. 1999Go, 2001Go). During the implantation it was necessary to sever the splenium of the corpus callosum to permit retraction of the cerebral hemispheres and visualization of the collicular surface lying anterior to the tentorium. This procedure disrupted transmission of some acoustic or visual transcallosal fibers (Lomber et al. 1994Go). Intracranially, the insulated shafts of the cryoloops were in contact with the bony tentorium and exited the cranial vault posteriorly. The cryoloops were fixed to the skull with bone screws and dental acrylic.

After cryoloop implantation, the dura mater was replaced and bone defects around the implanted cooling loops were repaired with bone and Gelfoam. Dermal incisions were repaired with silk sutures that were removed about 10 days later. During the initial period after awaking, the cats were also given buprenorphine analgesic (0.01 mg/kg, sc). Ambi-pen (G.C. Hanford Manufacturing, Syracuse, NY) systemic antibiotic (300,000 units, im) was administered every 2 or 3 days for 1 wk to guard against possible infection. In all cases, postsurgical recovery was uneventful.

Behavioral testing of the effects of SC deactivation

Baseline performance levels were reestablished after cooling loop implantation and before any deactivations, to verify that neither the surgical procedures nor the presence of the cryoloops interfered with performance and to ensure stationarity of motivational and performance states. During testing, the cats wore a harness and a tether that supported the cooling tubes and thermocouple wire. The cat enjoyed full freedom of movement in the arena. Cooling deactivation of the superior colliculus was effected by pumping cold methanol through the lumen of the cryoloop tubing. Cryoloop temperature was monitored continuously by a microthermocouple attached to the union of the loop. Cooling of collicular cryoloops to 2°C was sufficient to deactivate the superficial and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (Lomber et al. 2001Go). Orienting data were also collected at higher cryoloop temperatures to assess the effects of partial SC deactivation.

Testing sessions were typically carried out once a day with 10 testing blocks collected in each session. Performance was tested in the presence and absence of cooling the superior colliculus cryoloop and a three-step testing paradigm was used. 1) Baseline data were collected before any cooling. 2) Testing began with cooling deactivation of the collicular cryoloop. 3) Baseline levels were reestablished after cessation of cooling and reactivation of the superior colliculus. Each of the testing steps consisted of at least two blocks of trials. Performance on blocks of trials, or groups of blocks, was compared both within and between testing sessions.

Auditory cortex ablation

Three months after implantation of the SC cooling loops and subsequent testing, auditory cortex of the left hemisphere was ablated. Each cat was prepared for surgery as described for the SC cryoloop implants. A midline incision was made in the scalp and the left temporalis muscle was detached and reflected laterally. A craniotomy was made over auditory cortex and the bone piece was stored in sterile saline. The dura mater was then incised and reflected to expose the cerebrum. The ablations of auditory cortex were made by subpial aspiration and encompassed all of the contiguous regions of acoustically responsive cortex with the intention to remove the anterior ectosylvian gyrus, the middle ectosylvian gyrus, the anterior half of the posterior ectosylvian gyrus, and the dorsal halves of the anterior and posterior sylvian gyri (Fig. 1). The following landmarks were used as borders for the ablations: the middle suprasylvian sulcus, the crown of the posterior ectosylvian gyrus, the middle of the ectosylvian sulcus, and the ventral end of the posterior ectosylvian sulcus (Fig. 1). Saline-soaked sterile gelatin sponges were placed in the cortical defect and, when hemostasis was achieved, the dura and stored bone piece were restored to their normal position. The temporalis muscles were sutured together and the skin incision was repaired. The cats were then recovered using procedures described for the SC cryoloop implantations.

Behavioral testing of the effects of auditory cortex ablation and in combination with SC deactivation

After the ablation of auditory cortex in the left hemisphere, the cats were tested daily for 3 mo. After 3 mo of postablation testing, daily cooling deactivation of the right SC resumed. Cooling deactivation of the right SC was conducted using the three-step testing paradigm described earlier. Most orienting data were collected during cooling of the SC cryoloops to 2°C (to deactivate the superficial and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus; Lomber et al. 2001Go), although orienting data were also collected at higher cryoloop temperatures to assess the effects of partial SC deactivation.

Terminal procedures

At completion of testing, two cats (SEA1 and SEA2) were anesthetized (sodium pentobarbital, 25–30 mg/kg, iv) and temperatures in the superior colliculus were measured with microthermocouples during cooling of the cryoloops to 10 and 2°C. From these measurements it was possible to map the depth from the collicular surface that contained deactivated neurons. The purpose was to identify the position of the 20°C thermocline [20°C is the critical temperature below which synaptic activity is silenced (Bénita and Condé 1972Go; Jasper et al. 1970Go; Lomber et al. 1999Go)]. Positions between the 20°C thermocline and the cooling loop were at temperatures <20°C and were silenced, whereas positions distal to the 20°C thermocline, relative to the cooling loop, were warmer than 20°C and partially or fully active.

Collicular temperatures during cooling were measured using microthermocouples (150 microns in diameter) manufactured for us by Omega Engineering (Stamford, CT). The microthermocouples were first positioned and then the loop was cooled to several temperatures. This procedure ensured that temperature measurements for a given cryoloop temperature setting were taken at exactly the same sites in the colliculus. For each measurement, the SC was cooled for about 5 min before a recording was made, as occurred in the behavioral component of the study. This protocol was then repeated at multiple, sequentially sampled sets of sites.

After completion of both mappings, the cats were then anesthetized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg, iv) and perfused with fixatives in accordance with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association Panel on Euthanasia (Beaver et al. 2001Go). The brains were fixed with 10% formalin, blocked, removed from the cranium, and cryoprotected with 30% sucrose, after which 50-æm-thick coronal sections were cut and stained for Nissl substance, myelin, and cytochrome oxidase.

The third cat (SEA3) received a systemic injection of 14C-2 deoxyglucose (2DG; 100 µCi/kg, iv), as described previously (Payne and Lomber 1999Go). One day before 2DG administration a venous catheter was inserted into a cephalic vein. During 2DG administration, the cat was fully conscious to maximize uptake. The cat was comfortably restrained in a veterinary cat sack and the inlet and outlet tubes of the SC cryoloop were connected to the cooling circuit. After temperature stabilization at 2°C (about 5 min), the first of four boluses of 25 µCi kg–1 of 2-deoxy-D-[U-14C] glucose was administered. The remaining boluses were injected at 5-min intervals. Ten minutes after the final injection, heparin (2,000 units/kg, iv) and sodium nitrite (1 ml of 0.1% solution, iv) were administered and the cat was deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (45 mg/kg, iv) and perfused with fixatives in accordance with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association Panel on Euthanasia (Beaver et al. 2001Go). The brain was quickly exposed (about 4 min), removed from the skull, blocked, and photographed. The brain was coated with egg albumin and placed in methylbutane (–35°C). After 30 min, the brain was transferred to a –80°C freezer for subsequent tissue processing.

The brain was sectioned in the coronal plane on a cryostat (–20°C) at 35 µm and every fifth section was collected on coverslips. Dried sections were applied to X-ray film and processed using routine procedures (Payne and Lomber 1999Go). The extent of the deactivated area was then determined by delineating the region of decreased 2DG uptake. Cooling-induced decreases in 2DG uptake are obvious (Payne and Lomber 1999Go) and require only imaging equipment to assay the gradients on the fringes of the deactivation. For these purposes we used an MCID Elite imaging analysis system (Imaging Research, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada). The borders of the region of decreased 2DG uptake (>25% reduction) were determined by standardizing the brains with 14C standards (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and calibration curves (Gonzalez-Lima 1992Go) and by comparing the region with the similar site from a population of normal, nondeactivated brains that were not part of this study. Every fifth section was processed histochemically for the presence of cytochrome as we have done in the past (Payne and Lomber 1996Go) and adjacent sections were stained using conventional methods for the presence of Nissl bodies or myelin.

Lesion assessment

The location and size of the auditory cortex ablations were assessed directly by examining the defect in the gross brain both immediately after the perfusion and in photographs. In addition, microscopic assessments were made after histological processing and staining for Nissl substance or cytochrome oxidase. The auditory cortex was examined and the remaining regions of cortex were identified using architectonic criteria (Clascá et al. 1997Go; Kelly and Wong 1981Go; Rose 1949Go; Sanides and Hoffman 1969Go; Sousa-Pinto 1973Go; Winer 1992Go) and plotted onto standardized sections illustrated by Reinoso-Suárez (1961)Go. Examples of the cortical lesions reconstructions for the three cats examined in this study are given in Fig. 3. Retrograde degeneration in the thalamus was assessed microscopically and mapped using the designations of Jasper and Ajmone-Marsan (1954)Go and Berman and Jones (1982)Go.


Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Outline drawings to show the position and extent of the auditory cortex ablations in the left hemisphere (gray region) in each cat (A, Cat SEA1; B, Cat SEA2; C, Cat SEA3). Each part (A, B, and C) shows a lateral view of the cat cerebrum with 3 coronal sections (i–iii) for each of the 3 cats. Outlines adapted from the drawings of Reinoso-Suárez (1961)Go. Although the extent of the ablation varied for each cat, with A being the largest ablation and C being the smallest, the recognized auditory areas (Fig. 1) were removed in each subject.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In the first part we describe the auditory cortex ablations and extent of the cooling deactivations. In the second part we describe the behavioral consequences of SC cooling deactivation and combined SC deactivation with ablations of auditory cortex in the opposite hemisphere.

Ablation reconstruction

In all three cats, the auditory cortex ablations (Fig. 3) removed virtually all the cortex that is generally recognized to be acoustically responsive (Fig. 1). Reconstructions of the auditory cortex ablation show that the cortical tissue removed included all of the anterior ectosylvian gyrus as far rostral as the coronal level A15–16, the full extent of the middle ectosylvian gyrus, the anterior half of the posterior ectosylvian gyrus, and the dorsal halves of the anterior and posterior sylvian gyri (Fig. 3, AC, gray). The dorsal margin of the ablation was the middle suprasylvian sulcus, the posterior border was the crown of the posterior ectosylvian gyrus, the anterior end of the ablation was anterior to the posterior half of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus, and the ventral border of the ablation tended to be the ventral end of the posterior ectosylvian sulcus. Therefore the ablated region included the classically defined area AI (Reale and Imig 1980Go), the dorsal zone (Middlebrooks and Zook 1983Go), the region previously described as the suprasylvian fringe (Beneyto et al. 1998Go; Niimi and Matsuoka 1979Go; Paula-Barbosa et al. 1975Go; Woolsey 1960Go), the posterior auditory field or area P (Imig et al. 1982Go; Phillips and Orman 1984Go), the anterior auditory field or area A (Knight 1977Go; Reale and Imig 1980Go), the ventral posterior auditory field or area VP (Imig et al. 1982Go), the acoustically responsive field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (Clarey and Irvine 1986Go; Meredith and Clemo 1989Go; Mucke et al. 1982Go), area AII (Woolsey 1960Go), the insular area, the majority of the anterior sylvian area as defined by Clascá et al. (1997Go, 2000Go), the temporal area (area Te of Clascá et al. 2000Go), the ventral auditory field (VAF or V; Reale and Imig 1980Go), the dorsal (dPE), intermediate (iPE), and ventral (vPE) divisions of the posterior ectosylvian gyrus (EPD, EPI, and EPV of Winer 1992Go), and portions of area PS of Updyke (1986)Go. With the exception of the visual field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AEV), there was little or no involvement of visual or sensorimotor cortices. However, the involvement of this field in the lesion was unlikely to have any bearing on this study because deactivation of AEV does not interfere with orienting to either visual or acoustic targets (Lomber and Payne 2004Go).

In the thalamus, the ablations resulted in extensive degeneration in both the ventral and dorsal divisions of the medial geniculate nucleus ipsilateral to the cortical ablation. Some degeneration was also evident in all subdivisions of the lateral posterior–pulvinar (LP-Pul) complex as defined by Raczkowski and Rosenquist (1983)Go. These observations are consistent with similar qualitative observations made in earlier studies that performed equivalent ablations of auditory cortex (Casseday and Diamond 1977Go; Strominger 1969Go; Whitfield et al. 1972Go). There was little evidence of any degeneration in the A-laminae, C-complex, medial interlaminar nucleus (MIN), or geniculate wing divisions of the dLGN. Therefore there appeared to be little or no undercutting of visual fibers passing from the dLGN to visual cortex beneath auditory cortex. This observation was behaviorally confirmed by the lack of any deficits in visual orienting behavior after the auditory cortex ablations.

Cortical structure beneath the cooling loops

Dissection and exposure of the brain revealed that the cryoloops were in contact with the dorsal surface of the right superior colliculus. We verified that neither the surgical procedures nor the presence and repeated cooling of the cryoloops disturbed the superior colliculus. In all instances, cytoarchitecture appeared normal (Kanaseki and Sprague 1974Go) with no signs of damage, necrosis, or gliosis. The only evidence of the presence of cooling loops was small cryoloop contact impressions on the collicular surfaces.

Locus and extent of cooling deactivation

Thermal readings taken from two cats (SEA1 and SEA2) revealed that cooling of the superior colliculus cryoloops to 10°C created a 20°C thermocline at a depth of about 1.2 mm (Fig. 4A), which marks the boundary between the fully inactive and active zones (Lomber et al. 1999Go). Both the stratum griseum superficiale (SGS) and a major portion of the stratum opticum (SO) are contained between this boundary and the surface and we infer that neurons in this region were deactivated (gray region in Fig. 4A). This inference was substantiated in the third cat (SEA3) because cooling of the SC cryoloop to 10°C reduced 2DG uptake throughout SGS with little impact on SGI (compare Fig. 5A to Fig. 5B). Reduction of the cryoloop temperature to 2°C "pushed" the 20°C thermocline to a depth of 2.2 mm and toward the lower border of stratum griseum intermediale (SGI; Fig. 4B). Accordingly, we infer that most of the neurons in SGS, SO, and SGI were silenced when the loop temperature was reduced to 2°C (gray region in Fig. 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Temperature measurements recorded from identical sites in the superior colliculus (SC, using the nomenclature of Kanaseki and Sprague 1974Go) while the cooling loop (circles) was cooled to 10° (A) and 2°C (B). (i) Dashed line indicates the position of the 20°C thermocline estimated from these measurements. (ii) Gray region demarcates region of the SC with temperatures <20°C during cooling of the loop to 10° (A) and 2°C (B). With cooling to 10°C, the 20°C thermocline lay at the base of SGS, whereas cooling to 2°C pushed the position of the 20°C to the base of SGI. Left is medial and scale bar = 1 mm. CA, cerebral aqueduct; PAG, periaqueductal gray; SAI, stratum album intermediale; SAP, stratum album profundum; SGI, stratum griseum intermediale; SGP, stratum griseum profundum; SGS, stratum griseum superficiale; SO, stratum opticum; and SZ, stratum zonale.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Coronal 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) autoradiograms of the midbrain to show diminished 2DG uptake in the superficial layers of the SC during cooling of a cryoloop to 10°C (B). A: 2DG uptake in the SC when the cooling loop was not operational. Compare high levels of 2DG uptake (dark) in the superficial layers of the SC (A) to low uptake levels in the cooled SC (B). Circles indicate position of the cryoloop over the dorsal surface of the SC. Left is medial. Scale bar = 1 mm. PAG, periaqueductal gray; SGI, stratum griseum intermediale; and SGS, stratum griseum superficiale.

 
Thermal and 2DG measures show that the functional impact of the cooling was confined to the superior colliculus. There was no evidence that deactivating temperatures spread to the inferior colliculus or its brachium.

Acoustic orienting behavior

SUPERIOR COLLICULUS COOLING DEACTIVATION. Both before (Fig. 6A) and after (Fig. 6B) implantation of the superior colliculus cryoloop over the dorsal surface of the right SC, all three cats (Fig. 6, i–iii) were highly proficient at detecting and orienting toward the broadband, white noise burst emitted from any of the 13 speakers positioned throughout the 180° field. The only positions showing any weakness in orienting were the left and right 90° stimulus locations, where performance was slightly imperfect (Fig. 6, A and B). The similarities between the pre- and postimplant performance indicate that neither the surgical implantation of the cooling loops nor the continual presence of the loops interfered with accurate sound localization.


Figure 6
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Orienting responses to an acoustic stimulus from each of the 3 cats (i–iii). A: control data collected before cryoloop implantation (Pre-Implant) and auditory cortex ablation (Pre-Lesion). B: data collected before auditory cortex ablation (Pre-Lesion), but after implantation of the SC cryoloop (Post-Implant). Note that the presence of the collicular cryoloop did not alter performance. C: data collected during cooling of the collicular cryoloop to 2°C. Note that deactivation of the right superior colliculus resulted in the complete neglect of acoustic stimuli in the left (contracooled) hemifield. Dorsal view icons of the cat brain indicate the presence or absence of an auditory cortex ablation, cryoloop implantation (stippled oval), and cryoloop operational status (black = operational). In this and subsequent data graphs, the 2 concentric semicircles represent 50 and 100% response levels and the length of each bold line corresponds to the percentage of responses at each location tested. For each experimental condition (A–C) and each locus tested, data from ≥100 stimulus presentations are shown.

 
Unilateral cooling of the right superior collicular loop to 2 ± 1°C virtually eliminated acoustic orienting responses into the left (contracooled) hemifield (Fig. 6C). The animals approached the default (0°) position when the stimulus was presented in the impaired field. This reduction in correct orienting responses was from 99% (before cooling; Fig. 6B) to <1% (after cooling; Fig. 6C). In contrast, acoustic orienting responses into the right (ipsicooled) hemifield were prompt and strong, indistinguishable from normal (Fig. 6C). The boundary between the impaired and unimpaired hemifields was centered on the midline and was extremely sharp. Moreover, performance during the cooled phases of a testing session was the same several months after cryoloop implantation as it was after implantation. Therefore there was no evidence for deficit attenuation over time and that any dural growth around the cooling loops was negligible. Furthermore, accurate orienting performance to every position examined returned to normal levels after the daily termination of cooling. The similarities between the warm and rewarm performance indicate that the repeated daily cooling of the cryoloops did not impair sound localization accuracy after rewarming of the cortex. These results were consistent with SC deactivation results described in earlier studies (Lomber et al. 2001Go, 2002Go) and confirmed the effectiveness of the SC cryoloop in each cat.

We cooled the right SC to 2 ± 1°C because earlier studies had determined that cooling an SC loop to 2 ± 1°C would fully deactivate both the superficial and intermediate layers of the SC (Lomber et al. 2001Go). In the present study, we sought to determine the minimum level of cooling necessary to cause a complete impairment of acoustic orienting into the contralateral hemifield. In each animal, we systematically decreased the temperature of the SC cryoloop in 3°C increments. Figure 7 shows the results from this experiment. At SC cryoloop temperatures ≥11°C, there was no decrease in accurate acoustic orienting responses to any positions in the contralateral hemifield (Fig. 7, A and B). However, at temperatures <11°C, the size of the acoustic orienting deficit in the contralateral field increased as the temperature of the SC cryoloop decreased (Fig. 7). This contralateral (left) hemifield deficit was temperature-dependently graded from periphery to center (Fig. 7, C and D). Decreasing loop temperatures never affected accurate acoustic orienting into the ipsilateral (right) hemifield (Fig. 7). The deficit was complete when the loop temperature reached 2°C (Fig. 7E). This result was consistent for all three cats.


Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. Acoustic orienting responses during cooling of the right SC cryoloop to decreasing temperatures. Right cryoloop at 38°C (A), 11°C (B), 8°C (C), 5°C (D), and 2°C (E). For conventions, see Fig. 6. Note progressive reduction of auditory responses as cryoloop temperature was lowered, until orienting to the acoustic stimuli presented in the left (contracooled) hemifield was abolished. Data from Cat SEA 2. For each experimental condition (A–E) and each locus tested, data from ≥24 stimulus presentations are shown.

 
SUPERIOR COLLICULUS COOLING DEACTIVATION AFTER AUDITORY CORTEX ABLATION. Both before (Fig. 6A) and after (Fig. 6B) the right SC loop implantation, all three cats (Fig. 6, i–iii) were highly proficient at the acoustic orienting task. However, after the removal of auditory cortex of the left hemisphere all three cats (Fig. 8, i–iii) failed to orient to any positions in the contralesional (right) hemifield (Fig. 8B). These large ablations of auditory cortex were without impact on the ipsilesional (left) hemifield (Fig. 8B). The cats were tested daily for 3 mo after the auditory cortex ablation. The deficit was stable and there was no evidence of deficit attenuation.


Figure 8
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 8. Orienting responses to an acoustic stimulus from each of the 3 cats (i–iii). A: data collected before auditory cortex ablation (Pre-Lesion), but after implantation of the SC cryoloop (Post-Implant). B: data collected after the auditory cortex ablation (Post-Lesion) in the left hemisphere and after implantation of the SC cryoloop (Warm). Note that the left auditory cortex ablation eliminated acoustic orienting responses in the right hemifield. C: data collected after the auditory cortex ablation (Post-Lesion) and during cooling deactivation of the right collicular cryoloop to 2°C (Cool). Note that deactivation of the right SC resulted in a restoration of auditory orienting responses into the right hemifield. For conventions, see Fig. 6. i–iii: data collected from each of the 3 cats. For each experimental condition (A–C) and each locus tested, data from ≥100 stimulus presentations are shown.

 
Three months after the ablation, daily cooling deactivation of the right SC resumed. Deactivation of the right SC cryoloop to 2 ± 1°C restored acoustic orienting responses throughout all but the peripheral-most (75 and 90°) positions in the right hemifield, contralateral to the auditory cortex ablation (Fig. 8C). Minor deficits in orienting to the most peripheral positions (75 and 90°) in the left hemifield, ipsilateral to the ablation, also appeared during cooling of the right SC (Fig. 8C). The quality of the orienting responses into the restored hemifield were rapid and direct and appeared to be indistinguishable from orienting responses evoked during control conditions. Cessation of right SC deactivation resulted in the loss of the restored responses into the right hemifield and the three animals returned to orienting to acoustic targets presented only in the left hemifield (Fig. 8B). Therefore the restored responses were completely reversible.

Deactivation of the right superior colliculus after the ablation of the left auditory cortex (Fig. 8C) yielded a fundamentally different result from that identified during deactivation of the right SC before the removal of left auditory cortex (Fig. 6C) in the same animal. Before removal of the auditory cortex, deactivation of the right SC resulted in a profound orienting deficit specific to the contralateral (left) field (Fig. 6C). After the removal of left auditory cortex, deactivation of the right SC did not cause an orienting deficit in the contralateral field (Fig. 8C). Instead, this deactivation nullified the deficit caused by the left auditory cortex ablation and acoustic orienting responses were restored into the right hemifield. These findings are similar to the original results described by Sprague (1966)Go in the visual system where it was described how deactivation of the contralesional SC nullifies the effects of the visual cortex ablation and restores visual orienting responses into the cortically blind hemifield. Possible mechanisms mediating this acoustical version of the "Sprague Effect" are considered in the DISCUSSION.

Restoration of the acoustic orienting responses during cooling of the SC was temperature-dependently graded from center to periphery (Fig. 9). At higher cryoloop temperatures the restoration in orienting was only partial (Fig. 9, C–E). At the lowest temperatures, when restoration was complete, a minor deficit in the far periphery of the left hemifield could be identified (Fig. 9F). Figure 10 graphically shows the gradual restitution of acoustic orienting over a 12°C range of increased cooling deactivation of the superior colliculus. Therefore because an SC cryoloop temperature of 2°C is required for a complete restoration of acoustic orienting responses (Fig. 9), and cooling an SC cryoloop deactivates SGS, SO, and SGI, we can now deduce that restoration of acoustic orienting responses requires the deactivation of SGS, SO, and SGI. Merely cooling an SC loop to 10°C, which deactivates only SGS and SO, is not sufficient to fully restore acoustic orienting responses.


Figure 9
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 9. Acoustic orienting responses during cooling of the right SC cryoloop to different temperatures in a cat with an ablation of auditory cortex in the left hemisphere. SC cryoloop at 38°C (A), 14°C (B), 11°C (C), 8°C (D), 5°C (E), and 2°C (F). Data from Cat SEA2. For conventions, see Fig. 6. Note progressive restoration of auditory orienting responses as cryoloop temperature was lowered below 14°C. Restoration progressed from the midline into the periphery as cryoloop temperature decreased to 2°C. For each experimental condition (A–F) and each locus tested, data from ≥24 stimulus presentations are shown.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 10. Graph illustrating the mean percentage correct responses into either the right (filled symbols and solid line) or left (open symbols and dashed line) hemifield during progressive cooling of the cryoloop in contact with the right SC (circle). Note that responses into the right hemifield begin at zero as a consequence of the auditory cortex ablation in the left hemisphere. Each symbol represents data from 10 or more testing blocks. Circles, squares, and triangles represent data from Cats SEA1, SEA2, and SEA3, respectively. Results were very similar for all 3 animals.

 
Visual orienting behavior

Although the ablations of auditory cortex had a profound effect on acoustic orienting into the contralateral hemifield (Fig. 6B), the ablation did not have any impact on visual orienting into the same hemifield (Fig. 11) and all responses were robust. These results confirm the specificity of the ablation on acoustic processing. These results also confirm that the motor reporting system was operational after the ablation of auditory cortical areas.


Figure 11
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 11. Visual orienting data collected from each cat after the removal of auditory cortex in the left hemisphere. Note that for each cat (i–iii), the left auditory cortex ablation eliminated acoustic orienting responses into the right hemifield (Fig. 8B) while not changing visual orienting responses into the same hemifield. For conventions, see Fig. 6.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Behavioral summary

We obtained four major results from our examination of acoustic and visual orienting responses after removal of auditory cortex during cooling deactivation of the contralesional superior colliculus.

  1. )Unilateral cooling deactivation of the superficial and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SZ, SGS, SO, and SGI) results in a profound deficit in orienting to acoustic stimuli presented at any position in the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, hemifield.
  2. )Ablation of auditory cortex results in a profound deficit in orienting to acoustic, but not visual, stimuli presented at any position in the contralateral hemifield.
  3. )After the unilateral ablation of auditory cortex, the additional deactivation of the superficial and intermediate layers of the contralesional superior colliculus nullifies the consequences of the auditory cortex lesion and restores auditory orienting responses into the previously impaired hemifield to nearly normal, both qualitative and quantitative, performance levels.
  4. )A graded restoration was apparent during decreased cooling of the superficial and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus and was complete when the intermediate layers were fully deactivated.

In conclusion, similar to the visual system, after auditory cortex ablation, deactivation of the contralesional superior colliculus results in a restoration of acoustic orienting responses. Therefore the "Sprague Effect" can be identified in both visual and acoustic modalities.

Experimental considerations

In this study we positioned the SC cooling loops and tested their function before performing the ablations of auditory cortex. This procedural order consideration was critical for an accurate interpretation of the results. Although we hypothesized that deactivation of the contralesional superior colliculus would reverse the orienting deficits caused by unilateral destruction of auditory cortex, we expected that three results were possible: 1) that we would confirm the hypothesis; 2) that cooling of the SC would have no impact on behavior after the auditory cortex lesions (the "null" hypothesis); or 3) that cooling the SC would have an additive effect and there would be an orienting deficit in both hemifields. Regardless of the procedural order, in both the first and third possibilities, we would know that the SC cooling loops were functioning because a discernable change in behavior would be observed. For the first possibility, the deficit would be reversed and for the third possibility the deficit would become greater, including both hemifields. However, if the auditory cortex had been ablated before the SC loop implantation and if the second possible result (the "null" hypothesis) was identified, it would be impossible to determine whether the result was legitimate or whether the cooling loop was not adequately deactivating the SC. Therefore in this experiment it was critical for the SC loop to be implanted first and tested to verify that it was fully functional, before the ablation of auditory cortex.

Contributions of the superior colliculus to orienting behaviors

The superior colliculus (SC) plays an important role in orienting of the head and eyes to visual or acoustic stimuli (Apter 1946Go; Hess et al. 1946Go; Lomber et al. 2001Go; Sprague and Meikle 1965Go). Internally, the SC can be divided into superficial, intermediate, and deeper layers (Kanaseki and Sprague 1974Go), with the superficial layers connected almost exclusively to visual structures (Graybiel 1975Go; Harting and Guillery 1976Go; Harting et al. 1992Go), whereas intermediate and deeper layers receive afferents from multiple sensory cortices (visual, auditory, and somatosensory; Clemo and Stein 1984Go; Harting et al. 1992Go; Meredith and Clemo 1989Go; Tortelly et al. 1980Go) as well as brain stem sources (King et al. 1998Go). Accordingly, superficial layer neurons are exclusively visual, whereas intermediate and deep neurons respond to visual, acoustic, and somatosensory stimuli and many respond to more than one modality (Meredith and Stein 1986Go; Peck 1990Go; Stein et al. 1976Go; Wallace et al. 1993Go). Furthermore, visual space was previously identified to be mapped in both the superficial (Feldon et al. 1970Go) and intermediate and deep (Meredith and Stein 1990Go) layers of the SC, whereas auditory space is mapped in only the intermediate and deep layers (Middlebrooks and Knudsen 1984Go; Palmer and King 1982Go). Therefore it was not surprising when we identified that cooling deactivation of the SC had to extend into the intermediate layers (SGI; Fig. 4B) to produce a deficit in orienting to targets presented in the contracooled field. In contrast, earlier studies reported that deactivation of only the superficial layers (SGS) is required to produce a deficit in orienting to visual targets presented in the contracooled field (Lomber et al. 2001Go). Therefore results of the present behavioral study agree with the earlier behavioral and electrophysiological reports that showed that normal functioning of the superficial layers (SGS and SO) is necessary for proficient visual orienting and that normal functioning in the intermediate and deep layers (SGI) is necessary for accurate acoustic orienting.

Previous studies using physical ablations of the superior colliculus described ipsiversive turning of the cats after unilateral lesions (Sprague and Meikle 1965Go). However, this condition was generally reported to be short-lived. The animals quickly recover from the surgery and the ipsiversive turning is greatly reduced after 1 wk postop and generally absent after 1 mo (Sprague 1996Go; Sprague and Meikle 1965Go). Using unilateral reversible deactivation of the superior colliculus we did not observe any profound ipsiversive turning of the animals during repeated daily cooling deactivation (Lomber et al. 2001Go; present study). In agreement with these earlier studies (Sprague 1996Go; Sprague and Meikle 1965Go) we qualitatively observed shorter orienting latencies to the ipsicooled side and an absence of orienting contralaterally.

Although the consequences of unilateral SC ablations on acoustic orienting have been well documented, only two studies examined the consequences of bilateral SC deactivations on acoustic localization (Lomber et al. 2001Go; Tunkl 1980Go). In agreement with the present investigation, both of these studies show that unilateral collicular deactivations result in acoustic orienting deficits confined to the contralesional field (Lomber et al. 2001Go; Tunkl 1980Go). However, a bilateral ablation (Tunkl 1980Go) or cooling (Lomber et al. 2001Go) of the SC both show that these deactivations do not result in bilateral deficits. In fact, after deactivation of one SC, the additional deactivation of the contralateral SC restores acoustic orienting to the previously impaired hemifield. Overall, the only impairments are in the peripheral-most positions (left and right fields beyond 60°; Lomber et al. 2001Go). This restoration occurs only when both the superficial and intermediate layers of the SC are deactivated on both sides (Lomber et al. 2001Go). Therefore deactivation of the contralateral superior colliculus not only can restore acoustic orienting after a cortical ablation, but it can also restore acoustic orienting after an SC deactivation. This restoration does not occur at the cortical level because large bilateral lesions of all acoustically responsive cortices produce bilateral deficits in carnivores and primates (Girden 1939Go; Heffner 1978Go, 1997Go; Heffner and Heffner 1990Go; Kavanagh and Kelly 1987Go; Neff 1968Go; Neff et al. 1956Go; Ravizza and Diamond 1974Go; Strominger 1969Go; Thompson and Welker 1963Go).

Contributions of auditory cortex to acoustic orienting

For behavioral tasks involving sound localization and accurate orienting to an acoustic stimulus, the effects of cortical lesions are fairly well documented. Large unilateral lesions involving primary auditory and much of the remaining acoustically responsive cortex result in sound localization deficits confined to the contralateral hemifield. This result was previously documented in cats (Casseday and Diamond 1977Go; Cranford et al. 1971Go; Jenkins and Masterton 1982Go; Neff 1968Go; Neff et al. 1956Go; Strominger 1969Go; Thompson and Welker 1963Go; Whitfield et al. 1972Go; present study), ferrets (Kavanagh and Kelly 1987Go), dogs (Girden 1939Go), and old-world monkeys (Heffner 1997Go). These ablations result in a large area of acoustical space in which the subject is unable to localize sounds (Jenkins and Masterton 1982Go), encompassing nearly all the contralateral hemifield. From our observations, it appears that the border between the impaired and unimpaired hemifields is relatively sharp. Heffner (1997)Go suggested that a small region, not exceeding 18°, along the medial aspect of the impaired hemifield was a region of reduced localization ability that was not impaired to the same degree as the more lateral aspects of the impaired hemifield. If this "transitional" region between the unimpaired and impaired hemifields exists, then, as a result of the resolution of our testing paradigm, we suggest that it must be <15°.

Although the forebrain plays a significant role in orienting to an acoustic stimulus in primates and carnivores, the forebrain does not seem to play such a significant role in lower species such as rats or barn owls, two species in which sound localization has been extensively studied. Bilateral destruction of primary auditory cortex in the rat does not result in orienting errors to acoustic stimuli (Kelly 1980Go; Kelly and Glazier 1978Go; Kelly and Kavanagh 1986Go). Furthermore, when these ablations are expanded to include all regions of acoustically responsive cortex, no significant sound localization deficits can be identified (Kelly 1980Go; Kelly and Glazier 1978Go; Kelly and Kavanagh 1986Go). In the barn owl, lesions of the forebrain do not significantly impair accurate orienting and approach to an acoustic stimulus as long as the midbrain (optic tectum) is intact (Knudsen et al. 1993Go). Subsequent studies identified that the forebrain of the barn owl is critical for accurate orienting to the remembered location of a sound source (Knudsen and Knudsen 1996Go), whereas the optic tectum appears to be critical for stimulus-guided responses to a sound source (Knudsen and Knudsen 1996Go).

In the cat, whereas large ablations of acoustically responsive cortex produce a deficit in the contralesional hemifield, much smaller deactivations also produce contralateral impairments. Removal or deactivation of primary auditory cortex (AI), the posterior auditory field (PAF), or the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) produces sound localization deficits in the contralateral hemifield (Casseday and Diamond 1977Go; Jenkins and Masterton 1982Go; Jenkins and Merzenich 1984Go; Malhotra et al. 2004Go; Strominger 1969Go; Whitfield et al. 1972Go). However, the effects of the large lesions appear to be more profound than the smaller individual deactivations. For example, as noted in Malhotra et al. (2004)Go, during unilateral deactivation of AI, PAF, or AES, the animals would continue to orient into the impaired hemifield and make an incorrect choice. This contrasts with the results of the present study in which the cats failed to orient into the impaired hemifield. The animals would choose the default (0°) position when the stimulus was presented in the impaired field. The larger lesions seemed to produce a form of acoustic neglect (Clarke and Thiran 2004Go). Therefore reversal of the acoustic orienting deficits by deactivating the contralesional superior colliculus is even more striking.

Task-specific deficits

SUPERIOR COLLICULUS. In the present study we examined the conditioned ability of cats to orient and approach an acoustic target. However, it is also possible to study unconditioned responses to a sound source because cats will reflexively orient their heads to a white-noise sound burst. Unfortunately, we were unable to identify any studies that directly compared sound localization using head orienting versus whole body orienting during deactivations of the superior colliculus. The only information available on reflexive head orienting was from the study of Thompson and Masterton (1978)Go that examined unconditioned reflexive head orienting to a white-noise burst, in one cat, after unilateral damage of the superior colliculus. Thompson and Masterton (1978)Go reported that a unilateral lesion of the SC did effect head orienting to visual stimuli, but did not effect head orientation to sound, except for lengthening the latency of the response to the contralesional side. The results from this study are difficult to interpret because the lesion of the SC was not complete. We previously described that deactivation of only the superficial layers of the SC will impair orienting to visual stimuli, whereas deactivation of the entire SC, including the intermediate and deeper layers, is required to impair orienting to acoustic targets (Lomber et al. 2001Go). Thompson and Masterton (1978)Go reported that "a lesion of the superior colliculus that results in all the signs of dysfunction for visual orientation need not interfere with the essential elements of head orientation to sound." Although the results of Lomber et al. (2001)Go agree with this statement, it also establishes the likelihood that although the SC lesions of Thompson and Masterton (1978)Go were sufficient to reveal visual deficits, they were likely incomplete and may have been insufficient to produce acoustic deficits.

AUDITORY CORTEX. In sound localization tasks, the most common reporting mechanism has been to use orienting of the head or whole body toward the stimulus, which is often accompanied with an approach to the sound source. Consistent in these studies are the findings that unilateral deactivations of all acoustically responsive cortex impair sound localization within the hemifield contralateral to the deactivated cortex and that bilateral ablation of auditory cortex impairs sound localization throughout the ent