JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 97: 2204-2214, 2007. First published January 17, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.01244.2006
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/2204    most recent
01244.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, P. S.

Role of Membrane Potential in Calcium Signaling During Rhythmic Bursting in Tritonia Swim Interneurons

Evan S. Hill1 and Paul S. Katz1

1Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia

Submitted 28 November 2006; accepted in final form 12 January 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Rhythmic bursting in neurons is accompanied by dynamic changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration. These Ca2+ signals may be caused by membrane potential changes during bursting and/or by synaptic inputs. We determined that membrane potential is responsible for most, if not all, of the cytoplasmic Ca2+ signal recorded during rhythmic bursting in two neurons of the escape swim central pattern generator (CPG) of the mollusk, Tritonia diomedea: ventral swim interneuron B (VSI) and cerebral neuron 2 (C2). Ca2+ signals were imaged with a confocal laser scanning microscope while the membrane potential was recorded at the soma. During the swim motor pattern (SMP), Ca2+ signals in both neurons transiently increased during each burst of action potentials with a more rapid decay in secondary than in primary neurites. VSI and C2 were then voltage-clamped at the soma, and each neuron's own membrane potential waveform recorded during the SMP was played back as the voltage command. In all regions of VSI, this completely reproduced the amplitude and time course of Ca2+ signals observed during the SMP, but in C2, the amplitude was lower in the playback experiments than during the SMP, possibly due to space clamp problems. Therefore in VSI, the cytoplasmic Ca2+ signal during the SMP can be accounted for by its membrane potential excursions, whereas in C2 the membrane potential excursions can account for most of the SMP Ca2+ signal.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
During the production of rhythmic motor patterns by central pattern generators (CPGs), intracellular Ca2+ concentration in CPG neurons can play a role in the generation of bursting (Falcke 2000; Roussel et al. 2006Go) and in homeostatic regulation of cellular properties that allow bursting to occur (Marder and Goaillard 2006Go). The level of intracellular Ca2+ can be affected by the opening of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and by synaptically driven inputs that lead to increases in intracellular Ca2+. Synaptically driven inputs (including neuromodulatory inputs) can cause a direct influx of Ca2+ through ligand-gated channels (Fucile 2004Go; Nayak et al. 1999Go), alter Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated channels (Kloppenburg et al. 2000Go; Ladewig et al. 2004Go; Oikawa et al. 2005Go) or alter the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (Berridge 1998Go). Determining the contributions of these mechanisms to Ca2+ signaling in CPG neurons during bursting is a first step toward understanding the control of Ca2+ dynamics during motor pattern generation.

The CPG underlying the escape swimming behavior of the opisthobranch mollusk Tritonia diomedea provides an opportunity to study Ca2+ signaling in a well-defined neuronal network. The CPG circuit contains three types of interneurons: the serotonergic dorsal swim interneurons (DSIs), cerebral interneuron 2 (C2), and ventral swim interneuron B (VSI) (Fig. 1). The swim is an episodic behavior; the neurons do not produce the rhythmic swim motor pattern (SMP) until it is triggered by sensory input. During the SMP, the CPG neurons fire three to eight rhythmic bursts of action potentials with a period of ~7 s. The Tritonia swim CPG has been described as a network oscillator; none of the neurons can generate rhythmic membrane potential oscillations in isolation, rather rhythmic activity arises through network interactions (Getting 1989Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. The Tritonia swim network and morphology of ventral swim interneuron B (VSI) and cerebral neuron 2 (C2). A: diagram of the Tritonia swim network: all neurons have a contralateral homologue that is not represented here. {blacktriangleup}, excitatory synapses; bullet, inhibitory synapses. {blacktriangleup} and bullet, multi-component synapse. ---, polysynaptic pathways. The swim central pattern generator (CPG) is shown in the shaded region and comprises the interneurons DSI, C2, and VSI. B: Oregon Green fill of VSI in an unfixed, living preparation. Secondary neurites can be seen in the ipsilateral pleural and pedal ganglia. Unlabeled ->, axon of VSI in pedal nerve 6. C: Oregon Green fill of C2 in an unfixed, living preparation. No secondary neurites can be seen in the cerebral ganglia, but secondary neurites are visible in the contralateral pedal ganglion. Unlabeled ->, axon of C2 in pedal nerve 6. Ce, cerebral ganglion; Pd, pedal ganglion; Pl, pleural ganglion.

 
The swim CPG contains intrinsic neuromodulation: serotonin, released from the DSIs, modulates the synaptic output strength of both C2 and VSI (Katz and Frost 1995aGo,bGo; Katz et al. 1994Go; Sakurai and Katz 2003Go). In fact, serotonin is necessary and sufficient for initiation of the SMP: application of a serotonin receptor antagonist prevents the SMP from occurring, whereas intracellular stimulation of individual DSIs or bath application of serotonin can initiate an SMP (Fickbohm and Katz 2000Go; McClellan et al. 1994Go). It is possible that the release of serotonin from the DSIs or the release of other unidentified neuromodulators could allow the SMP to occur by contributing to Ca2+ signaling in VSI and C2.

In this study, we first observed the Ca2+ signals in VSI and C2 during the SMP. Then, to determine the proportion of those Ca2+ signals that could be accounted for by membrane potential excursions during the SMP, we voltage-clamped VSI and C2 in turn and measured the Ca2+ signals produced by playing back the voltage recordings of these neurons during the SMP as the voltage command. Thus VSI and C2 reproduced the same membrane potential excursions, but did not receive the same synaptic and neuromodulatory inputs as during the SMP. Our data show that SMP membrane potential excursions can completely account for the SMP Ca2+ signals in VSI but not in C2.

Portions of this work have been published previously in abstract form (Hill and Katz 2005Go).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Experiments were performed on Tritonia diomedea obtained from Living Elements (Delta, British Columbia, Canada). Animals were maintained in artificial recirculating, chilled (10°C) seawater prior to experiments. Dissection protocols were as described earlier (Getting et al. 1980Go; Katz and Frost 1995aGo). The isolated brain, consisting of the fused cerebropleural ganglion and the pedal ganglia, was pinned to a silicone elastomer (Sylgard)-coated 35-mm petri dish, desheathed, and superfused with chilled (10°C) normal saline, containing (in mM) 420 NaCl, 10 KCl, 10 CaCl2, 50 MgCl2, 10 D-glucose, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4.

Neurons were impaled with glass microelectrodes filled with 3 M KCl (8–12 M{Omega}). VSI was identified on the basis of the following characteristics: soma location (1 cell layer below the surface of the ventral side of the pleural ganglion), activity during the SMP, intrinsic properties such as the presence of A-current (Getting 1983Go), and the presence of its action potential in the pedal-pedal connective (PdN 6). C2 was identified on the basis of its soma location, appearance, and activity during an SMP (Getting 1983Go; Getting et al. 1980Go; Taghert and Willows 1978Go). The SMP was evoked by electrical stimulation of a body wall nerve, pedal nerve 3 (7–10 V, 2-ms pulses, 10 Hz for 1–1.5 s).

After identification, either VSI or C2 was re-impaled with a microelectrode containing 2.5 mM Ca2+ green 1 (CG-1) or 2.5 mM Oregon Green bis-(o-aminophenoxy)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) 1 (OGB-1) dissolved in dH2O (both from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The calcium indicator was iontophoresed using –1.0 to –7.0 nA, 500-ms pulses at 1 Hz for 10–40 min. After a successful injection, the soma always appeared pink to magenta in color. To allow for complete diffusion of the dye into distal regions of the neuron, the brain was then left for a few hours to overnight, constantly superfused with normal saline at 8–9°C. To image the neurites in the pedal ganglion, neuronal somata on the ventral surface of the pedal ganglion were removed with fine forceps. This allowed for visualization of the neurites of VSI or C2 in the neuropil and did not impair the SMP activity.

For Ca2+ imaging, the petri dish was transferred to a fixed stage Zeiss Axioskop 2 microscope outfitted with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal laser scanning system (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The filled VSI or C2 was impaled again with a fine tipped electrode filled with 3 M KCl. For Ca2+ imaging, an Argon laser (488 nM) was used to excite CG-1 or OGB-1, and a band-pass emission filter (500 to 550 nm) was used. Either a x5 air objective (0.25 N.A.) or a x20 water-immersion objective (0.7 N.A.) was used for imaging. After selecting a frame of interest, a time series of that frame was acquired (2–4 Hz, 2.5 µs pixel dwell time, 512 x 512 pixels/frame). A delay of 50–100 ms between frames was introduced to reduce photo-damage and phototoxicity.

To measure changes in Ca2+, regions of interest (ROIs) were selected, and the raw fluorescence data were saved as a text file. Correction for background fluorescence was made by averaging the values in two or more regions not stained by the Ca2+ indicator and subtracting those values from the ROIs of indicator stained regions. The change in fluorescence ({Delta}F/Fo) was calculated with respect to the average baseline fluorescence (Fo; measured for 10 s) in each ROI prior to nerve stimulation. The time constant of decay ({tau}) of the calcium signal was measured from the peak of the final burst in the SMP.

For electrophysiological recordings, we used an AxoClamp 2B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA), connected by a 1401micro AD converter [Cambridge Electronic Design (CED), Cambridge, UK] to a PC running Spike2 software (CED) for collection and analysis of data. An output pulse from the LSM was used to trigger a stimulator (A-M Systems, Carlsborg, WA), synchronizing the acquisition of imaging and electrophysiology data. In each preparation several SMPs were elicited by stimulation of pedal nerve 3 (7–10 V, 2-ms pulses, 10 Hz for 1–1.5 s). Each stimulus resulted in a slightly different SMP in terms of spike frequency and number of swim cycles. We usually selected the SMP with the most swim cycles for replaying in voltage clamp. For voltage-clamp recordings of VSI or C2, we used discontinuous single-electrode voltage clamp (dSEVC). The sampling rate was usually set at 0.7 kHz, and the gain was set at 0.7 nA/mV. We continuously monitored the quality of the clamp on an oscilloscope with a fast sweep speed. For playing back the swim voltage waveform, we modified the baseline of the voltage recording to be 0 mV. The membrane potential of the neuron was held at its natural resting potential, and the modified swim episode was used as the voltage command. We usually replayed the SMP two to three times with each resulting in virtually identical Ca2+ signals.

For measurement of the time constant of decay ({tau}), curves were fit to single exponentials using SigmaPlot (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA). Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat (Jandel Scientific), and a P value of <0.05 was considered a significant difference. Error bars represent SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Rhythmic Ca2+ signals during the SMP showed spatial heterogeneity in VSI

The VSI soma is located in the pleural ganglion, and it has an extended geometry with at least two distinct arborizations (Fig. 1B). A primary neurite extends anteriorly and projects laterally to the ipsilateral pedal ganglion. VSI has secondary neurites proximal to the soma in the pleural ganglion and secondary neurites in the pedal ganglion. It is not known whether VSI receives inputs in both regions and it is not known where VSI synapses with its postsynaptic follower neurons.

During the SMP, VSI and the other swim CPG neurons fire bursts of action potentials riding on underlying membrane potential oscillations (Fig. 2, bottom). Ca2+ signals imaged during the SMP showed rhythmic oscillations that corresponded to the action potential bursts recorded at the soma of VSI (Fig. 2). Rhythmic Ca2+ signals were recorded in both proximal (pleural ganglion; Fig. 2A) and distal (pedal ganglion) regions (Fig. 2B) of VSI.


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. VSI Ca2+ signals in proximal (A) and distal (B) regions during a swim motor pattern (SMP). A and B: SMP was elicited by a nerve shock ({uparrow}). Differences in temporal dynamics of Ca2+ signals in primary vs. secondary neurites were observed in both proximal (A) and distal (B) regions of VSI. In the primary neurite, the Ca2+ signals summated and stayed above the basal level long after the nerve shock. In the secondary neurites, the Ca2+ signals did not summate and returned back to basal levels faster than in the primary neurite.

 
There were consistent differences between the Ca2+ signals imaged in primary and secondary neurites in both the proximal and distal regions of VSI. The Ca2+ signals in primary neurites decayed more slowly than those of secondary neurites in both proximal and distal regions of VSI, and the Ca2+ signals in distal neurites decayed more rapidly than in the corresponding proximal neurites [i.e., distal primary neurites vs. proximal primary neurites, and distal secondary neurites vs. proximal secondary neurites; Table 1, P < 0.05 for all the preceding pair-wise comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA on ranks with Student-Newman-Keuls multiple pair-wise comparisons)]. The peak amplitude of the Ca2+ signal was greater in VSI secondary neurites than in primary neurites in the proximal region. Furthermore, the Ca2+ signal in primary neurites was significantly greater in distal than in proximal regions [Table 1, P < 0.05 for both pair-wise comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA on ranks with Student-Newman-Keuls multiple pair-wise comparisons)].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Decay time constant and peak amplitude of Ca2+ signals in VSI and C2

 
Membrane potential during the SMP entirely accounted for the Ca2+ signals in VSI

To determine the extent to which the Ca2+ signal in VSI was caused by the membrane potential excursions during the SMP, VSI was voltage-clamped (dSEVC) and its own membrane potential recorded during the SMP was played back as the voltage command. In this way, the VSI membrane potential reproduced the same pattern that it exhibited during the SMP without the influence of synaptic and neuromodulatory inputs. This protocol effectively reactivated VSI without activating the rest of the network to produce the SMP (Fig. 3). In this example, two rhythmically active pedal ganglion neurons were recorded during the SMP: a ventral flexion neuron (VFN) and a dorsal flexion neuron A (DFN-A) (Hume et al. 1982Go). When the VSI swim membrane potential excursions were recreated via voltage-clamp (Fig. 3), the DFN-A no longer displayed rhythmic activity. The VFN was directly driven by VSI but showed greatly reduced activity compared with its activity during the SMP. Extracellularly recorded rhythmic activity was also greatly curtailed, leaving only the VSI action potentials in pedal nerve 6. Similar results were observed in three preparations. These results suggest that replaying the swim motor pattern in VSI did not activate the CPG.


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Replaying the VSI SMP voltage waveform under voltage clamp (VC) did not elicit an SMP. A: during the SMP, VSI, and 2 pedal ganglion neurons (a VFN and a DFN-A) are rhythmically active. Rhythmic activity was also observed in pedal nerve 6. B: voltage clamping VSI and using its own SMP waveform as the voltage command caused VSI to exhibit voltage signals identical to those during the SMP; however, the DFN-A was not rhythmically active, and the VFN (directly driven by VSI) showed greatly reduced activity compared with its activity during the SMP, and no rhythmic activity was observed in pedal nerve 6 (VSI's spikes can be observed in pedal nerve 6). Thus replaying VSI's SMP voltage waveform in VC did not elicit an SMP.

 
Replaying the VSI membrane potential excursions from the SMP fully reproduced the Ca2+ signals recorded during the SMP in both the proximal (Fig. 4A) and distal regions of VSI (Fig. 4B). Even the difference in the time course of the Ca2+ signals in primary and secondary neurites was reproduced by the voltage playback. To quantify the signal, the area under the {Delta}F/Fo curve was integrated from the time of the stimulus to 60 s after the end of the SMP. There were no significant differences between the Ca2+ signals produced by playback of the membrane potential and those imaged during the SMP [Fig. 4, A and B; P > 0.05 in all cases (paired t-test)].


Figure 4
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Using the SMP voltage signal as the voltage command fully reproduced the SMP Ca2+ signals in primary and secondary neurites in the proximal (A) and distal (B) regions of VSI. Ai: SMP (black traces) and VC (blue traces) Ca2+ signals from proximal regions superimposed. Aii: there was no significant difference in the integral [({Delta}F/F)*s] (s = seconds) values between the SMP and VC Ca2+ signals in both the primary and secondary neurites in the proximal regions of VSI [P > 0.05 for both (paired t-test)]. Bi: SMP (black traces) and VC (blue traces) Ca2+ signals in distal regions superimposed. Bii: there was no significant difference in the integral [({Delta}F/F)*s] values between the SMP and VC Ca2+ signals in both the primary and secondary neurites in the distal regions of VSI [P > 0.05 for both (paired t-test)].

 
Contribution of spikes and underlying membrane potential oscillations to the Ca2+ signals in VSI

To determine the relative contribution to the Ca2+ signal of the action potentials and the underlying membrane potential depolarization during the SMP, we used each separately as the voltage command and measured the respective Ca2+ signals (Fig. 5). In the different regions of VSI, there were differences in the extent to which the spikes alone contributed to the Ca2+ signals. In proximal primary neurites, the action potential waveforms alone reproduced 75.5% of the integrated amplitude of Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform (n = 2), whereas in the proximal secondary neurites, spikes alone accounted for 60.1% of the signal (n = 2; Fig. 5A, i, green traces, and ii). In proximal regions of VSI, the underlying SMP membrane potential oscillations, produced Ca2+ signals that were 35.0 and 31.7% of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; both n = 3; Fig. 5A, i, magenta traces, and ii). Thus most of the Ca2+ signal during the SMP in the proximal regions of VSI was spike-mediated, but the subthreshold membrane potential oscillations contributed substantially.


Figure 5
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. The SMP action potentials or the underlying potential as the voltage command produced differential Ca2+ signals in proximal (A) vs. distal (B) regions of VSI. Ai: in proximal regions of VSI, the SMP action potentials (green traces) produced larger Ca2+ signals than did the underlying potential (magenta traces). Aii: in proximal regions of VSI, the action potentials alone as the voltage command produced Ca2+ signals that were 75.5 and 60.1% (primary and secondary neurites, respectively, both n = 2) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform. The underlying waveform alone as the voltage command produced Ca2+ signals that were 35.0 and 31.7% (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; both n = 3) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform. Bi: in distal regions of VSI, using the SMP action potentials (green traces) as the voltage command produced Ca2+ signals that were similar in amplitude to those produced by the full SMP waveform. Using the underlying potential (magenta traces) as the voltage command produced extremely small Ca2+ signals. Bii: in distal regions of VSI the action potentials alone as the voltage command produced Ca2+ signals that were 74.1 and 95.5% (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; n = 3 and n = 4, respectively) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform. The underlying waveform alone as the voltage command produced Ca2+ signals that were 11.6 and 5.3% (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; n = 3 and n = 4, respectively) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform.

 
In distal regions, the spikes alone accounted for an even greater percentage of the Ca2+ signal, whereas the subthreshold membrane potential oscillations played almost no role. When just the action potential waveforms were played back as the voltage command, 74.1% of the signal produced by the full SMP waveform was observed in the primary neurites (n = 3) and 95.5% in the secondary neurites (n = 4; Fig. 5B, i, green traces, and ii). Replaying the underlying SMP membrane potential signal produced just 11.6 and 5.3% of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; n = 3 and n = 4, respectively; Fig. 5B, i, magenta traces, and ii). Thus the Ca2+ signal in the distal regions of VSI appears to be primarily spike-mediated.

Rhythmic Ca2+ signals showed spatial heterogeneity in C2 during the SMP

Unlike VSI, C2 has its soma in the cerebral ganglion and projects contralaterally to the pedal ganglion. It has almost no arborizations in the cerebral ganglion but has extensive arborizations in the contralateral pedal ganglion. As with VSI, it is unknown where C2 receives synaptic inputs or contacts it postsynaptic followers.

Rhythmic Ca2+ signals were observed in all areas of C2 during the SMP (Fig. 6). In distal (pedal ganglion) regions of C2, the Ca2+ signals decayed more rapidly in the secondary neurites than in the primary neurites [Table 1, P < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA on ranks with Dunns multiple pairwise comparisons)]. Although the time constant of decay of the signals in the proximal (cerebral ganglion) primary neurite was about twice that of the distal primary neurite, the difference did not show statistical significance [Table 1, P > 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA on ranks with Dunns multiple pairwise comparisons)]. Furthermore, although there was a trend for the peak amplitude to be largest in the distal secondary neurite and smallest in the proximal primary neurite, there were no significant differences between the peak Ca2+ signals in any of regions of C2 [Table 1, P = 0.109 (1-way ANOVA)].


Figure 6
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Ca2+ signals in proximal (A) and distal (B) regions of C2 during an SMP. A and B: SMP was elicited by a nerve shock ({uparrow}). A: in proximal regions of C2, the Ca2+ signals summated during the course of the SMP. B: in distal regions of C2, Ca2+ signals in the primary neurite summated during the course of the SMP, whereas Ca2+ signals in the secondary neurite did not.

 
Voltage-clamp at the soma could not completely account for SMP Ca2+ signals in C2

To test whether the Ca2+ signals imaged in C2 during the SMP could be accounted for by membrane potential excursions, we performed the same procedure as previously described for VSI of voltage-clamping (dSEVC) C2 at the soma and replaying the membrane potential of the neuron recorded during the SMP. As with VSI, this did not cause the network to generate the SMP (Fig. 7). A DSI and a pedal ganglion neuron that burst as a DFN-A (Hume et al. 1982Go) that had been rhythmically active during the SMP were only minimally affected during the replay of the SMP membrane potential excursions in C2 (Fig. 7; similar results were observed in 3 preparations). Also during the SMP, large rhythmic units were observed in pedal nerve 6 that were absent during the SMP replay in C2. However, C2 propagating action potentials generated by the replay were observed in the recording of pedal nerve 6 (Fig. 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. Replaying C2's SMP voltage waveform in VC does not elicit an SMP. A: during the SMP C2, a DSI and a pedal ganglion neuron (a DFN-A) were rhythmically active and rhythmic activity was also observed in pedal nerve 6. B: voltage clamping C2 and using its own SMP waveform as the voltage command caused C2 to exhibit voltage signals identical to those during the SMP; however, the DSI and the DFN-A were not rhythmically active. Further, no rhythmic activity was observed in pedal nerve 6 (C2's spikes can be observed in pedal nerve 6). Thus replaying the C2 SMP voltage waveform in VC did not elicit an SMP.

 
Again, as with VSI, the replayed membrane potential reproduced the different time courses of Ca2+ signals observed during the SMP in the different regions of C2 (Fig. 8, A and B). However, unlike VSI, the amplitudes of the integrated Ca2+ signals were significantly smaller in the voltage-clamp replay than the original SMP. This was true for Ca2+ signals in the proximal primary neurite (both ipsi- and contralateral) of C2 [P < 0.05 for both (paired t-test); Fig. 8A] and in the distal primary and secondary neurites [P < 0.05 for both (paired t-test); Fig. 8B].


Figure 8
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 8. In proximal (A) and distal (B) regions of C2, the VC Ca2+ signals were smaller than the SMP Ca2+ signals. Ai: proximal C2 SMP (black traces) and VC (blue traces) Ca2+ signals were superimposed, and the difference between the 2 waveforms is shown in red. Aii: integral [({Delta}F/F)*s] values for the VC Ca2+ signals were significantly smaller than the SMP Ca2+ signals in both the ipsi- and contralateral primary neurites in the proximal region of C2 [P < 0.05 for both (paired t-test)]. Bi: VC Ca2+ signals in distal regions of C2 were smaller than the SMP Ca2+ signals. SMP (black traces) and VC (blue traces) Ca2+ signals were superimposed, and the difference between the 2 waveforms is shown in red. Bii: integral [({Delta}F/F)*s] values for the VC induced Ca2+ signals were significantly smaller than the SMP Ca2+ signals in distal primary and secondary neurites of C2 [P < 0.05 for both (paired t-test)].

 
Voltage clamping the distal neurite in C2 recreated the SMP Ca2+ signals

To test whether the differences between the SMP Ca2+ signals and the voltage-clamp-induced Ca2+ signals in all regions of C2 could be caused by space-clamp problems, we sought to voltage clamp the distal primary neurite of C2. In numerous attempts, we managed to impale the distal neurite of C2 only three times, and of those, only once could we maintain the recording long enough to voltage clamp the distal neurite. We first recorded the SMP voltage and Ca2+ signals in the distal neurites of C2, and then voltage-clamped the distal primary neurite and recreated the SMP voltage excursions. We found that this completely recreated the SMP Ca2+ signals (Fig. 9), something that we never observed while voltage clamping at the soma of C2. Although we were able to perform this technically difficult experiment only once, this result was clear and suggests that space-clamp issues rather than synaptic inputs could be the cause of the discrepancies between the SMP and voltage-clamp Ca2+ signals observed while clamping C2 at the soma.


Figure 9
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 9. When the distal primary neurite of C2 was impaled, the SMP Ca2+ signals were fully recreated by replaying the SMP membrane potential excursions under voltage clamp. In both the distal primary and secondary neurites of C2, the VC Ca2+ signals (blue traces) were virtually identical to the SMP Ca2+ signals (black traces).

 
Contribution of spikes and underlying membrane potential oscillations to the Ca2+ signals in C2

The proportion of the Ca2+ signal that can be accounted for by the action potentials in C2 was less than in VSI. In proximal regions of C2, the spikes alone produced only 12.6 and 17.9% (ipsi- and contralateral, respectively, both n = 5) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform (Fig. 10A,i green traces, ii). The subthreshold membrane potential oscillations accounted for a greater proportion of the Ca2+ signal: 42.1 and 36.8% (ipsi- and contralateral, respectively, both n = 5) in the proximal regions of C2 (Fig. 10A, i, magenta traces, and ii).


Figure 10
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 10. Using the SMP action potentials or the underlying potential produced differential Ca2+ signals in proximal (A) vs. distal (B) regions of C2. Ai: using the underlying potential (magenta traces) as the voltage command produced Ca2+ signals in the proximal regions of C2 that were stronger than those produced by using the action potentials (green traces) as the voltage command. Aii: in proximal regions of C2, the action potentials alone produced Ca2+ signals that were 12.6 and 17.9% (ipsi- and contralateral regions, respectively; both n = 5) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform. In the proximal regions of C2, the underlying potential alone produced Ca2+ signals that were 42.1 and 36.8% (ipsi- and contralateral regions, respectively; both n = 5) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform. Bi: in distal regions of C2, using either the action potentials (green traces) or the underlying potential (magenta traces) as the voltage command produced small Ca2+ signals. Bii: in the distal regions of C2, the action potentials alone produced Ca2+ signals that were 22.3 and 37.1% (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; n = 4 and n = 6, respectively) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform. In the distal regions of C2, the underlying potential alone produced Ca2+ signals that were 2.4 and 17.7% (primary and secondary neurites, respectively; n = 4 and n = 7, respectively) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform.

 
In distal regions of C2, the action potentials produced Ca2+ signals that were 22.3% (n = 4) and 37.1% (n = 6; primary and secondary neurites, respectively) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform (Fig. 10B, i, green traces, and ii). In distal regions of C2, the subthreshold membrane potential oscillations produced Ca2+ signals that were 2.4% (n = 4) and 17.7% (n = 7; primary and secondary neurites, respectively) of the Ca2+ signals produced by the full SMP waveform (Fig. 10B, i, magenta traces, and ii).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Ca2+ signals rhythmically oscillate during the SMP in both VSI and C2

We recorded rhythmic Ca2+ signals in all regions of two Tritonia CPG neurons (VSI and C2) during the SMP. The Ca2+ signals oscillated in time with the membrane potential signals recorded during the SMP. Similar time-locking of Ca2+ signals to membrane potential signals has been reported in other rhythmically active systems (Backsai et al. 1995; Ladewig and Keller 2000Go; Ross and Graubard 1989Go; Viana Di Prisco and Alford 2004Go). In both VSI and C2, Ca2+ signals during the SMP exhibited more rapid dynamics in secondary neurites compared with primary neurites. These differences may reflect differences in Ca2+ buffering and/or extrusion or could indicate that Ca2+ signals are mainly generated in the secondary neurites.

Membrane potential excursions can fully account for the SMP Ca2+ signal in VSI but not C2

We found that the SMP Ca2+ signals in all regions of VSI could be completely reproduced by recreating the SMP voltage signal via voltage clamp at the soma. In contrast, voltage clamp at the soma of C2 could not completely reproduce the amplitude of the SMP Ca2+ signals in all regions of C2. Space-clamp issues or synaptic inputs to C2 during the SMP could account for the discrepancy between the SMP Ca2+ signals and the Ca2+ signals produced by voltage clamp at the soma of C2. At any rate, in both neurons recreating the SMP voltage signals faithfully reproduced the differences in Ca2+ dynamics (i.e., primary vs. secondary neurite) observed in during the SMP even when the voltage signals were generated in the somata instead of in the neuropil.

The VSI result was somewhat unexpected; we hypothesized that neuromodulatory or synaptically driven Ca2+ signals would contribute to the Ca2+ signal recorded during the SMP. Dynamic biochemical signaling has been speculated to play a potentially integral role in the generation of the Tritonia SMP (Clemens and Katz 2003Go). Therefore we expected that VSI would receive at least some synaptic inputs during an SMP that would have produced some of the SMP Ca2+ signal. However, our data show that rather than Ca2+ driving the voltage oscillations, the voltage oscillations drive the entire Ca2+ signal recorded in VSI during rhythmic bursting. Thus in VSI, Ca2+ entry via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels appears to be responsible for the entire Ca2+ signal during rhythmic bursting. It remains unknown whether Ca2+ entry via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels leads to Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores. Finally, it is possible that synaptic and/or neuromodulatory inputs during the SMP could contribute to Ca2+ signaling in highly restricted microdomains near synaptic terminals.

Synaptic inputs to C2 during the SMP or space-clamp issues may underlie the discrepancy between the SMP Ca2+ signals and those produced by the SMP replay

In one experiment, we were successful at holding the recording long enough to voltage clamp the distal neurite of C2 and replay the SMP voltage signal. This did recreate the SMP Ca2+ signals in both the primary and secondary neurites of C2, something we never observed with voltage clamp at the soma. This result suggests that space-clamp issues could be the cause of the discrepancy between the SMP Ca2+ signals and those produced by replaying the SMP voltage signal at the soma of C2. However, because we were not able to voltage clamp the distal neurite of C2 more than once, these results must be interpreted with caution.

It remains a possibility that synaptic inputs to C2 during the SMP could contribute to Ca2+ signaling. First of all, a neurotransmitter/modulator (such as serotonin) could activate metabotropic receptors, leading to second-messenger cascades that result in localized Ca2+ signals (i.e., release of Ca2+ from internal stores or Ca2+ influx) without causing any voltage signals. In the leech Retzius neuron, activation of metabotropic serotonin receptors induces an influx of Ca2+ through Ca2+ channels located mainly in the dendrites (Beck et al. 2002Go). Further, activation of metabotropic receptors can lead to an augmentation of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from internal stores. In lamprey reticulospinal axons, activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors leads to a rapid release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores in a Ca2+-dependent manner (Cochilla and Alford 1998Go). These Ca2+ signals would not be reproduced by the voltage signal alone in the absence of the synaptic inputs that triggered the second-messenger cascade that produced or augmented the Ca2+ signals. Second, synaptic inputs during the SMP could enhance Ca2+ entry into C2 through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Biogenic amines have been shown to both increase and decrease Ca2+ entry through voltage-gated channels. In mouse hypoglossal neurons, serotonin decreases Ca2+ influx through voltage-activated Ca2+ channels (Ladewig et al. 2004Go), and in the lobster STG (stomatogastric ganglion), dopamine increases voltage-activated Ca2+ currents in some CPG neurons and decreases it in others (Johnson et al. 2003Go). Imaging experiments showed that in one lobster STG neuron dopamine decreases voltage-activated Ca2+ entry in presynaptic terminals (Kloppenburg et al. 2000Go). Nicotine can also increase Ca2+ entry through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (Oikawa et al. 2005Go). Thus during an SMP, synaptic inputs to C2 could potentially enhance Ca2+ entry through voltage-activated Ca2+ channels. In fact, recent experiments have shown that stimulation of one DSI (causing synaptic release of serotonin) enhances spike-mediated Ca2+ signaling in distal regions of C2 (Hill and Katz 2006Go). Finally, receptors, such as nicotinic ACh, NMDA, and 5-HT3 receptors, themselves have been shown to be permeable to Ca2+ (Cochilla and Alford 1999Go; Fucile 2004Go; Nayak et al. 1999Go; Single and Borst 2001Go). Synaptic inputs to C2 during an SMP could thus directly lead to Ca2+ influx into C2 via Ca2+-permeable receptors.

Spikes versus underlying waveform—contribution to the full Ca2+ signals in VSI and C2

VSI and C2 differed in the contribution of action potentials to the Ca2+ signals. In the distal regions of VSI, the action potentials alone accounted for ~75–95% of the Ca2+ signal, whereas the underlying potential had almost no effect. In proximal regions of VSI, the underlying potential contributed more to the Ca2+ signal, but still less than the contribution of the action potentials. These differences could reflect regional differences in the distribution of Ca2+ channels: for example, in distal regions there could be a greater density of high-threshold Ca2+ channels, whereas in proximal regions of VSI, the relative density of low-threshold Ca2+ channels could be higher.

In proximal regions of C2, the situation was reversed—the underlying potential contributed more to the Ca2+ signal than did the action potentials. These data indicate that in proximal regions of C2 there may be a greater density of low-threshold Ca2+ channels than high-threshold Ca2+ channels. Furthermore, the action potentials recorded in the soma of C2 tended to be smaller then those recorded in the soma of VSI, suggesting that the action potentials may be generated farther away from the soma in C2 than in VSI. In the distal regions of C2, the action potentials contributed more to the Ca2+ signal than did the underlying potential, suggesting that in distal regions of C2 there could be a greater relative density of high-threshold Ca2+ channels than low-threshold Ca2+ channels. In all regions of C2, the action potentials or the underlying waveform when used separately as the voltage command resulted in Ca2+ signals that, when added together, were much smaller than the Ca2+ signal that resulted from using the full SMP waveform as the voltage command. Thus in C2, there seems to be a supra-linear summation of Ca2+ signals from these two sources when they are presented together. Possibly, the high-threshold Ca2+ channels in C2 need to be, in essence, "primed" by the sub-threshold potential to permit a large volume of Ca2+ entry.

Differences in Ca2+ dynamics in primary versus secondary neurites in both VSI and C2

We observed differences in the temporal dynamics of Ca2+ signals in primary versus secondary neurites in VSI and C2 with the secondary neurites of both neurons exhibiting faster Ca2+ dynamics than the primary neurite. These differences in the decay rate of the Ca2+ signals could be, in part, due to differences in the morphology of the secondary neurites compared with the primary neurites. The secondary neurites have a much larger surface area to volume ratio than do the primary neurites. This could lead to more rapid extrusion of Ca2+ in the secondary neurites than in the primary neurites. Similar differences in temporal dynamics of Ca2+ signaling have been reported in other systems. In crab STG neurons, Ca2+ signals in fine branches exhibit differential temporal dynamics, but no Ca2+ signals were observed in the axon or soma, presumably due to a lack of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in those regions (Ross and Graubard 1989Go). Lobster STG neuronal somata show slower Ca2+ dynamics than do fine branches (Levi et al. 2003Go). Also, mouse hypoglossal neuron dendritic Ca2+ signals have faster recovery kinetics than somatic Ca2+ signals (Ladewig and Keller 2000Go).

The differences in the temporal nature of the Ca2+ signals that we observed in VSI and C2 primary and secondary neurites could have functional significance. For instance, presumptive synaptic regions of VSI and C2 (secondary neurites) could have more extensive Ca2+ buffering or extrusion than the axon (primary neurite). Because Ca2+ is known to play an intimate role in neurotransmitter release, intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis may be essential in synaptic regions of VSI and C2. Furthermore, intracellular Ca2+ is known to activate Ca2+-activated K+ channels, leading to decreased excitability (El Manira and Wallen 2000Go; Ladewig and Keller 2000Go). In synaptic regions, it may be important for such a decrease in excitability to end before the next burst of excitatory synaptic inputs arrives. Thus, in terms of recovery kinetics, the secondary neurites of VSI and C2 may represent separate Ca2+ compartments from the primary neurite.

Area-specific differences in the amplitude of Ca2+ signals in VSI

In VSI, Ca2+ signals were larger in the secondary neurites than in the primary neurites in the proximal regions of the neuron, and Ca2+ signals were also larger in the distal primary neurite than in the proximal primary neurite. Two studies in other systems, using ratiometric calcium indicators found similar amplitude differences. In lamprey spinal cord neurons, Ca2+ signals were found to be larger in distal than proximal dendrites (Viana Di Prisco and Alford 2004Go), and dendritic Ca2+ signals were larger than somatic Ca2+ signals in mouse hypoglossal neurons (Ladewig and Keller 2000Go). In VSI, the amplitude differences could reflect differences in the density of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Thus, the same voltage signal would elicit a larger Ca2+ signal in the areas containing a higher density of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels than in areas with a low density of such channels. In C2, there were no significant differences in the amplitude of Ca2+ signals in any region of the neuron, possibly indicating a homogeneous distribution of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels.

Ca2+ signaling in VSI and C2 during the SMP

In conclusion, we have shown that Ca2+ signals in two Tritonia CPG neurons during rhythmic bursting are similar in terms of Ca2+ dynamics and but may differ in the source of the Ca2+ signals. In VSI, the SMP Ca2+ signals appear to be purely a result of membrane potential excursions leading to Ca2+ influx via voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. In contrast, synaptic inputs may significantly contribute to Ca2+ signaling in C2 during the SMP.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-35371 to P. S. Katz.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank B. Neuhaus for technical assistance with the confocal microscope and A. Sakurai, J. Lillvis, and R. Calin-Jageman for important comments on this manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Katz, Dept. of Biology, Georgia State University, PO Box 4010, Atlanta, GA 30302-4010 (E-mail: pkatz{at}gsu.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bacskai BJ, Wallen P, Lev-Ram V, Grillner S, Tsien RY. Activity-related calcium dynamics in lamprey motoneurons as revealed by video-rate confocal microscopy. Neuron 14: 19–28, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Beck A, Lohr C, Berthold H, Deitmer JW. Calcium influx into dendrites of the leech Retzius neuron evoked by 5-hydroxytryptamine. Cell Calcium 31: 137–149, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Berridge MJ. Neuronal calcium signaling. Neuron 21: 13–26, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Clemens S, Katz PS. G protein signaling in a neuronal network is necessary for rhythmic motor pattern production. J Neurophysiol 89: 762–772, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cochilla AJ, Alford S. Metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated control of neurotransmitter release. Neuron 20: 1007–1016, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cochilla AJ, Alford S. NMDA receptor-mediated control of presynaptic calcium and neurotransmitter release. J Neurosci 19: 193–205, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

El Manira A, Wallen P. Mechanisms of modulation of a neural network. NIPS 15: 186–191, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Falcke M, Huerta R, Rabinovich MI, Abarbanel HD, Elson RC, Selverston AI. Modeling observed chaotic oscillations in bursting neurons: the role of calcium dynamics and IP3. Biol Cybern 82: 517–527, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Fickbohm DJ, Katz PS. Paradoxical actions of the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan on the activity of identified serotonergic neurons in a simple motor circuit. J Neurosci 20: 1622–1634, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fucile S. Ca2+ permeability of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Cell Calcium 35: 1–8, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Getting PA. Mechanisms of pattern generation underlying swimming in Tritonia. III. Intrinsic and synaptic mechanisms for delayed excitation. J Neurophysiol 49: 1036–1050, 1983.[Free Full Text]

Getting PA. A network oscillator underlying swimming in Tritonia. In: Neuronal and Cellular Oscillators, edited by Jacklet JW. New York: Dekker, 1989, p. 215–236.

Getting PA, Lennard PR, Hume RI. Central pattern generator mediating swimming in Tritonia. I. Identification and synaptic interactions. J Neurophysiol 44: 151–164, 1980.[Free Full Text]

Hill ES, Katz PS. Membrane potential accounts for the Ca2+ signal during rhythmic bursting in a swim CPG neuron in the mollusk Tritonia diomedea. Soc Neurosci Abstr 31: 54.3, 2005.

Hill ES, Katz PS. Heterosynaptic enhancement of spike-evoked Ca2+ signals by a serotonergic interneuron. Soc Neurosci Abstr 32: 350.3, 2006.

Hume RI, Getting PA, Del Beccaro MA. Motor organization of Tritonia swimming. I. Quantitative analysis of swim behavior and flexion neuron firing patterns. J Neurophysiol 47: 60–74, 1982.[Free Full Text]

Johnson BR, Kloppenburg P, Harris-Warrick RM. Dopamine modulation of calcium currents in pyloric neurons of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion. J Neurophysiol 90: 631–643, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katz PS, Clemens S. Biochemical networks in nervous systems: expanding neuronal information capacity beyond voltage signals. Trends Neurosci 24: 18–25, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Katz PS, Frost WN. Intrinsic neuromodulation in the Tritonia swim CPG: serotonin mediates both neuromodulation and neurotransmission by the dorsal swim interneurons. J Neurophysiol 74: 2281–2294, 1995a.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katz PS, Frost WN. Intrinsic neuromodulation in the Tritonia swim CPG: the serotonergic dorsal swim interneurons act presynaptically to enhance transmitter release from interneuron C2. J Neurosci 15: 6035–6045, 1995b.[Abstract]

Katz PS, Getting PA, Frost WN. Dynamic neuromodulation of synaptic strength intrinsic to a central pattern generator circuit. Nature 367: 729–731, 1994.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kloppenburg P, Zipfel WR, Webb WW, Harris-Warrick RM. Highly localized Ca2+ accumulation in an identified motoneuron and its modulation by dopamine. J Neurosci 20: 2523–2533, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ladewig T, Keller BU. Simultaneous patch-clamp recording and calcium imaging in a rhythmically active neuronal network in the brain stem slice preparation from mouse. Pfluegers 440: 322–332, 2000.

Ladewig T, Lalley PM, Keller BU. Serotonergic modulation of intracellular calcium dynamics in neonatal hypoglossal motoneurons from mouse. Brain Res 1001: 1–12, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Levi R, Samoilova M, Selverston AI. Calcium signaling components of oscillating invertebrate neurons in vitro. Neuroscience 118: 283–296, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Marder E, Goaillard JM. Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 563–574, 2006.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

McClellan AD, Brown GD, Getting PA. Modulation of swimming in Tritonia: excitatory and inhibitory effects of serotonin. J Comp Physiol [A] 174: 257–266, 1994.[Medline]

Nayak SV, Ronde P, Spier AD, Lummis SCR, Nichols RA. Calcium changes induced by presynaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 serotonin receptors on isolated terminals from various regions of the rat brain. Neuroscience 91: 107–117, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Oikawa H, Nakamichi N, Kambe Y, Ogura M, Yoneda Y. An increase in intracellular free calcium ions by nicotonic acetylcholine receptors in a single cultured rat cortical astroctye. J Neurosci Res 79: 535–544, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Roussel C, Erneux T, Schiffmann SN, Gall D. Modulation of neuronal excitability by intracellular calcium buffering: from spiking to bursting. Cell Calcium 39: 455–466, 2006.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Ross WN, Graubard K. Spatially and temporally resolved calcium concentration changes in oscillating neurons of crab stomatogastric ganglion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 1679–1683, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sakurai A, Katz PS. Spike timing-dependent serotonergic neuromodulation of synaptic strength intrinsic to a central pattern generator circuit. J Neurosci 23: 10745–10755, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Single S, Borst A. Different mechanisms of calcium entry within different dendritic compartments. J Neurophysiol 87: 1616–1624, 2001.[ISI]

Taghert PH, Willows AOD. Control of a fixed action pattern by single, central neurons in the marine mollusk, Tritonia diomedea. J Comp Physiol 123: 253–259, 1978.[CrossRef]

Viana Di Prisco G, Alford S. Quantitative investigation of calcium signals for locomotor pattern generation in the lamprey spinal cord. J Neurophysiol 92: 1796–1806, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/2204    most recent
01244.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, P. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.